What You Should Absolutely Never Order At Burger King

Planning a visit to your local Burger King? Do yourself a favor and don't

order

these menu items. From unappetizing calorie bombs to fish sandwiches that may not be as fresh, here are some fast food meals you

should

never

order

at Burger King. Burger King's Single Stacker King is a quarter pounder topped with bacon, cheese, and

what

the fast food chain calls a "special Stacker sauce." Calorie-wise, it's nothing too crazy, containing 700 digestible calories. Well, his big brother is that

burger

on steroids. "What else do you want?" "You got the single, you got the double, you got the triple." "Hey King, I think I may have dripped on you." The Triple Stacker King is huge, disgusting, and has more calories than any other item on Burger King's menu.

This monster

burger

includes three patties, several slices of cheese, and more bacon than anyone

should

consume in one sitting. In short, it's a beastly burger that's best avoided. Before we get into The Triple Stacker King's calorie count, remember when critics criticized Burger King for its Smoked Bacon and Cheddar Double Angus Burger in 2012? The burger had 966 calories... a fact that worried Tam Fry, spokesperson for the National Obesity Forum. Fry commented: "This burger is the height of irresponsibility and, if left unchecked, the food industry will do nothing to help stop the current obesity epidemic." Good. With its whopping 1,370 calories, The Triple Stacker King basically laughs at those critics.

And considering how many calories this burger has, you'd expect every bite to be a taste of meaty heaven. Well, Brand Eating didn't exactly give it a winning endorsement. The reviewer thought the burger was good if you wanted a lot of meat and cheese, but concluded, "This was too much for me." Considering it's stuffed with six slices of bacon, it's safe to say that Burger King's Triple Stacker King is "a little much" for everyone. The Big Fish is essentially Burger King's answer to McDonald's Filet-O-Fish... only much more disappointing. "It's fishing season at Burger King." The good news is that you get lettuce, pickles, and tartar sauce to help you drown it all out.

Meanwhile, breaded Alaska pollock fillet is reportedly left on a warming tray for too long. An alleged former Burger King employee wrote on Reddit that: "sometimes I would have the same 2 or 3 fish fillets in the warmer for days on end." We sincerely hope that's an exaggeration... but other employees have made similar claims about the sandwich, telling, presumably horrified, Reddit readers that: "They also save some leftover so they don't have to make it new every time someone orders it, so you can We'll be getting older. Let's say you order the Big Fish because of its relatively low 510 calories.

Can you at least expect it to taste good? According to Business Insider, the answer is a resounding no. The website reviewed seven fast-food fish sandwiches and the Big Fish came in fifth. The reviewer wrote, "This fish is gray and sad, like the last lone tuna in the fish market." In other words? This is a fish you'll want to throw away. The Bacon King consists of two beef patties, a few slices of American cheese and six strips of bacon practically covered in ketchup and mayonnaise. "Okay, we'll take you to ours. First floor, muffin. Second floor, two burgers, third floor, attic, six strips of bacon, sesame seed roof." "Mm-mmm." As Paste pointed out, the burger is also an exact replica of Wendy's popular Baconator.

Doesn't it exist anymore? honor among fast food chains? Beyond that, it seems that the only thing that differentiates the Bacon King from the Double Stacker King is that they left out the "Stacker special sauce" and opted for ketchup and mayonnaise. After all , the

king

of bacon reigns supreme when it comes to calories, saturated fat, and sodium. In other words, you'll have to pedal for several hours to burn off the 1,040 calories and 26 grams of saturated fat. We hope you have an especially cheerful spinning instructor Fast food is usually relatively inexpensive... but sometimes you have to wonder if the deal is too good to be true.

Case in point: Burger King's chicken nuggets. In 2018, the company launched this promotion: " Has the

king

gone crazy? It offers ten juicy, crispy white meat chicken nuggets for just one dollar." Wendy's and McDonald's certainly don't offer that kind of deal on chicken nuggets. While 10 nuggets for one dollar is a good deal, it begs the question: why are they so cheap? It might be a classic case of "you get

what

you pay for." To that end, one Chowhound user bluntly stated, "BK's chicken nuggets officially suck!... They were flat (think at half the thickness of a McD's nugget), flavorless and the 'meat' was unidentifiable." And Business Insider isn't a big fan of the nuggets either, writing that "firm, but not crunchy compared to other options. "These nuggets have a spongy texture that feels questionable." Thanks but no thanks, Burger King.

We'll get our chicken nugget fix elsewhere. Clearly, Burger King isn't winning any points when it comes to the creativity of the nuggets. burgers...and Rodeo King is another big disappointment. "Answers the question: did you order the Rodeo burger?" The burger is really just the Bacon King, only they added some onion rings and swapped the ketchup for barbecue sauce. That's all friends, there's nothing else to see here. Burger King somehow managed to increase the calorie count of the burger, and at 1,480 calories, it has even more calories than the damn Triple Stacker King. Oh, and we hope you enjoy a good morning walk... "Burger King for breakfast?

Yes, there is such a thing!" Because you're going to walk for hours and hours and hours to get rid of the calories in this burger. Doesn't that seem like a lot of work for a few extra onion rings and some barbecue sauce? You might think we're being unfairly harsh on the Rodeo King. Maybe it's packed with juicy flavor to offset these high-calorie crimes? If only that were the case. The GrubGrade reviewer said he wished the burger had more bun to compensate for the overwhelming saltiness. And an alleged Burger King employee wrote on Reddit that the burger is basically a stomach ache waiting to happen.

One thing we know for sure: this burger is definitely not the queen of the rodeo. Sometimes, it's the seemingly inconspicuous menu items you have to worry about. Let's say you walk into your local Burger King because you want to see if you still love a Whopper like you did when you were a teenager. You might think ordering the Whopper Jr. is the smart choice. After all, it's only 310 calories compared to The Whopper's 660 calories. But not so fast. Whatever you do, don't order that Whopper Jr. because you might end up regretting it, and not just because it's one of Burger King's most intimidated burgers. "Did you harass this burger?" "Okay, yes." "This is a helpless Whopper Jr.

He can't defend himself." "We don't mean anything by this." "It's just for laughs." "It's just for laughs!" Here's the truth about this seemingly innocent junior burger. It seems that the Whopper Jr. is a very unpopular burger. If Burger King's menu were high school, the Whopper Jr. would earn the superlative of "most forgettable" in the yearbook. And since it's an unpopular choice, the burgers are said to be not that fresh, if an alleged Burger King employee is to be believed. Writing on Reddit, the alleged Burger King employee said: "Never, ever, ever buy the junior whopper, not enough people buy them so they just sit and go bad." This firebrand Redditor goes on to say that the burgers simply "take too long to be fresh." And apparently, managers tell employees to "use the super old ones" that have been unused for a while.

Oh. Of course, eating at Burger King isn't doing your health any favors. So if you really want a Whopper, go ahead and order the real thing. That way, you'll apparently have a much better chance of getting a freshly made burger. If you want chicken, don't go to Burger King. It's not their specialty and you're likely to get something that leaves you totally disappointed. "When it comes to grilling, the King always trumps the Colonel." But? Because in a fast food grilled chicken sandwich showdown, Eat This, Not That! Burger King's grilled chicken sandwich took last place. The reviewer even said that the chicken tastes "dry" and "artificial" and has, quote, "a discordant floral undertone." Burger King has since switched from mayonnaise to honey mustard, but it doesn't seem to have helped much.

One YouTube reviewer said the sandwich just doesn't have much flavor and people on social media are equally disappointed. Another dissatisfied customer wrote on Twitter: "Just tried the new grilled 'chicken' sandwich. I took a bite and almost threw up, for $5 you should be ashamed of yourself." Meanwhile, another customer wrote: "Tell me how you pay almost $6 for a grilled chicken sandwich, not for the food, just for the sandwich...and there's more bread and lettuce than chicken?" According to an alleged Burger King employee on Reddit, it's not the best idea to order the sandwich if you're in a hurry: The chicken is usually grilled only after someone places an order, and that can take quite a while.

One warning: you're at Burger King... so order a burger. Considering the plant-based Impossible Whopper isn't available at every Burger King, it may seem a little premature to add the item to this list... but we have our reasons. First of all, it's probably not a bad idea to double check your burger when you order an Impossible Whopper. "It's made of beef right here, see? It's beef." "We swear, it's not beef." Don't be so sure about that. A Burger King in Brooklyn, New York, was reportedly caught tricking customers into thinking they were buying a vegan Impossible Whopper... but they were actually served regular Whoppers with meat.

Then there's the matter of the sandwich itself. You might think that the Impossible Whopper is a healthier alternative to the meat Whopper, but that's not necessarily the case. Sharon Zarabi RD, director of the Bariatric Program at Lenox Hill Hospital, told Healthline: "Health-wise, I don't think it makes a huge difference. I wouldn't define it as healthier, I would define it more as ethical." lower cholesterol level, the Impossible Whopper has much more sodium than the traditional Whopper, a whopping 1,080 milligrams, compared to 980 milligrams in a meat Whopper. Social media seems divided over the taste of the Impossible Whopper. One dissatisfied customer wrote on Twitter: "Impossible Whopper tasted like a dry, bland burger, while the Whopper tasted like beef.

I wasn't impressed." Meanwhile, other customers seem to like it, with one fan inelegantly tweeting: "I tried the Impossible Whopper and I'm a happy camper! I'm glad more and more fast food places have vegetarian options that don't taste like ass." Absolute!!!" Meanwhile, this lady was really into it: "You have to take a bite. It's delicious. It's really good." Of course, everyone has their own reasons for wanting to try the Impossible Whopper... but if you buy it because you think it's the healthier option, you might want to think again. Burger King has relied on its signature Croissan'wich to attract early-rising customers since the early '80s. "Sizzling bacon.

Tender ham. Or sausage." While there is a wide variety of Croissan'wiches to choose from, we're most concerned with the sausage-on-sausage variety. The double sausage version has a gasp-worthy 710 calories. Burger King's signature Whopper has fewer calories than that, coming in at 660 calories. And here's more bad news for you: many people on Reddit seem to think that the quality of the Croissan'wich has gone down a lot in recent years, with one customer writing: "I had the Croissan'wich a few weeks ago and it was very disappointing." Another disgruntled camper wrote: "I tried to order one several times last year and

never

finished them.

And for some reason I can't stand their eggs anymore." Maybe your local Burger King has a delicious Croissan'wich that's just right. And if not, you have to admit it: a breakfast that contains 710 calories and tastes like hot garbage is a terrible way to start the day. We recommend moving forward... until you find a healthier breakfast option. Check out one of our newest videos right here! Plus, more Mashed videos about your favorite things will be coming soon. Subscribe to our YouTube channel and press the bell so you don't miss a single one.