The IRA's War on London

London England Friday April 10, 1992 9:25 p.m. A white Ford Transit van sits idle in the heart of the City of London's financial district, parked directly in front of Britain's main shipping institution, the Baltic Exchange. There is an eerie silence somewhere in a dirty office at London's Waterl station. A phone rings holding the receiver. An operator answers the call a man at the other end mutters a warning 20 minutes the van in front of the stock exchange followed by a series of keywords 2.2 km northeast at 125 Old Broad Street the Stock Exchange Tower appears on a road and its parking spaces all of which are empty, the warning had identified the wrong building, suddenly, just down the street at the Baltic Exchange, a white van explodes in a violent explosion forming an arc at night.

The sky is filled with surrounding skyscrapers, smoke and flames leaping across glass and marble with nowhere to go. but up in a matter of seconds, the entire area is completely unrecognizable. The explosion leveled the facades of most of the surrounding buildings and destroyed every glass pane in the vicinity. People who were unlucky enough to be nearby didn't do much better either. A one-year-old girl sitting in her father's car a short distance from the van was killed instantly and her 8-year-old sister was left with hundreds of lacerations from a flurry of glass shards. Another victim, Tom Casey, 49 years old.

He was posted as a doorman at the Baltic Stock Exchange, replacing a colleague, while the latest victim, a 29-year-old stockbroker named Paul Butt, was passing by the building when the bomb exploded as the dust settled three people died 91 people were injured and around 350 million in damage to surrounding buildings it was a devastating attack according to temporary reports it was the most powerful bomb detonated in London since the Second World War but who were the culprits a few months ago Before the bombing in a shed in the county In South Armar in Northern Ireland, a group of men mix sugar with ammonium nitrate fertilizer, their work illuminated by a flickering fluorescent light that flickers almost impatiently.

These are members of the provisional Irish Republican Army or the p and they are building a bomb by crushing the mixture, it eventually turns into a fine highly explosive powder which they dry and transfer to plastic bags once finished, they throw their product onto a trailer which is quickly towed away by an accomplice tractor during the following days. Days, these bags are taken to the outskirts of London, where another group of P members wait to help them fulfill their purpose. They pack the ammonium and sugar bags together and bind the raw mixture with a CeX detonation cord connected to an American-made IO detonator.

The entire package weighs approximately 45 kg. Finally, a cash room changes hands. A van is purchased and a driver sets a course for central London to carry out the largest bombing raid on mainland Britain since the Blitz. This attack, although one of the most devastating, was only one of hundreds. that the IRA and its offshoot groups carried out in London between 1973 and 2001, but why did these attacks occur and what socio-political impact did they have on Britain? To find out, we must look at Northern Ireland and how you came to exist. You could imagine that integrating a sponsorship into a video about the IRA is difficult.

I can't exactly say that maybe if the IRA had used Surf Shark VPN, the sponsor of today's video, they might have been harder to track, but anyway, if you're someone who likes them. to keep your personal data secure. Cers Shark is the app for you. I have used several VPNs in the past and found Sur Shar to be one of the most intuitive, best designed, and perfect for protecting your personal data while browsing Surf Shark. keeps you safe when you're connected to public Wi-Fi, which is usually a gold mine for hackers. I also tend to find that it works better when trying to access content from other countries through Netflix and Amazon Prime video because they have become quite good at detecting when you are trying to access their sites through a VPN, but Surf Sharkk is still quite good.

Reliable in that regard and, more importantly, it is also very affordable. You have 30 days to try it with a money-back guarantee and you also get an extra three months free. When you use my Imperial code, you can scan this QR code here to redeem it or you can click my link in the description below to protect your privacy with Sur Shark VPN and support my channel in the process. Back to video for the uninitiated the North Island is not part of the island, it is currently part of the United Kingdom. Its existence is the main cause of the antagonism between the PIRA, who were militant Irish republicans seeking a united island, and Britain, which sought to maintain the island. status quo and maintaining Northern Ireland as one of the four nations of the United Kingdom after a bloody war of independence between 199 and 1921.

Northern Iran decided, unlike the rest of the island, not to seek independence from the United Kingdom and, instead, stay within it. an ethnic, political and economic crosscurrent that would form the backdrop to a decades-long campaign of terrorism that would ultimately aim to liberate Northern Ireland from what they considered an illegal British occupation. However, the roots of this conflict run deep and stretch back many hundreds of years into the past. By the mid-16th century, the kingdom of England had established a colony on the eastern coast of Iran in an area known as the Pale, however its control over the rest of the island had been largely conquered by its Anglo ancestors. -Normans.

Since then it had declined drastically to reestablish its authority, the English monarchy decided to create the so-called plantations throughout Ireland, the largest of which were monsters in the south and smell in the north. These plantations, which were basically fortified municipalities, were established in 1585 and 16609, respectively. established on land confiscated from rebellious Irish lords would attract English and Scottish Protestant settlers loyal to Britain (as the proponents of the plan admitted, they were explicitly colonial apparatuses that were intended to civilize the local Catholic population and convert them to Protestantism in the hope of that they did it). If they became more accommodating to British rule, the monstrous plantation would fail primarily because the Protestant settlers in the region were isolated and outnumbered by the predominantly Catholic native Irish population; instead, the olster plantation in the north would prosper, benefiting from the total confiscation of six counties from the local authorities.

The Irish Lords, after a failed rebellion and the resulting demographic collapse and relocation of the local Irish population in the following centuries, Northern Iran would become the center of Protestantism in Ireland and efforts to plant Protestant settlers elsewhere would yield limited results that many of you will probably be able to achieve. See the demographic divide foreshadowed here when overlaid with a modern map of violence you will see that the Protestant areas are the ones that decided to remain within the United Kingdom in the modern period. This unionist streak stems from the historical conditions surrounding Protestants in When they arrived in Ireland, the crown granted them considerable privileges and, in an attempt to create a powerful and loyal population willing to propagate their authority, artificially constructed a landed gentry that They associated their prosperity with links with Great Britain and they could sit in Parliament itself.

Catholic lands were confiscated and Catholics were denied the ability to generate generational wealth, and they were prevented from participating in the governing process until well into the 1790s, the majority of the island's inhabitants were Irish Catholics, but at By the 18th century, only 14% of available farmland was under their ownership, creating an elite Protestant class that ruled with great authority in favor of their socio-political and economic interests, while remaining completely divorced from much of the population. Irish Catholic population, this authority and its capacity. Shaping the political landscape in their favor depended primarily on Britain's ability to remain the dominant force on the island, so a symbiotic relationship emerged in which Britain would ensure a Protestant economic and political ascendancy and Protestants would act as agents. of control during the 19th century.

The North Island economy had become industrialized and was strongly intertwined with mainland Britain, which produced linen ships and specialized in engineering. It is not surprising then that the North Island, the nexus of Protestantism on the island, chose to remain in union with Great Britain, a scenario in which Ireland was to become a united independent state and Protestants became a minority population in the country would see its sociopolitical and economic positions threatened, as they would become potential targets of discrimination as Catholics have been for centuries. This is why Protestants campaigned for a United Kingdom of Great Britain. and Ireland, which would eventually form in 1801, a united political bloc allowed them to secure a majority against the Catholics in Ireland by uniting with the mainly Protestant population in Britain, so that is the historical basis for the competing national aspirations that we see. today a deep-rooted Protestant minority with historical connections to Britain who had put down roots in Northern Ireland and wished to remain in a union unionists versus a Catholic majority who sought a sovereign democratic state of their own republicans and nationalists this would lead to a division of society Based on religious and political reasons that led to the formation of Northern Ireland as a separate state in 1921, the only place in Ireland where Protestants had a majority in the decades after 1921, the Catholic minority felt increasingly squeezed and mistreated by the Protestant ruling class that in an attempt to ensure its permanent political supremacy Jerry Mander the new State of Northern Ireland this and the resulting inequalities caused thousands of Catholics to emigrate from the country, which ended in a strange demographic balance.

Catholics had many more children than Protestants, but the Exodus meant that demographic balance was maintained. In 1960, tensions and grievances between Catholics and Protestants were largely played out in the Civic Arena through political action groups and civil rights protests. Terrorism as a way to bring about political change was no longer fashionable and the IRA that would bomb London decades later was no longer fashionable. It already existed with the organization focusing on political rather than militant action in 1969, however the landscape had changed. Northern Ireland's royal olster police, staffed mostly by Protestants, have a habit of harshly attacking Catholic protesters, causing intense resentment.

Protestant paramilitaries such as the Olster Volunteer Force. He also stoked further tensions by intimidating and killing Catholics and destroying their businesses. What began as a movement for political and economic improvements with anti-establishment overtones evolved into one completely distrustful of the State and concerned about its increasing violence. It did not help that the British Army Calls to put down said violence was at times particularly brutal to suppress the anti-state ascendancy in the north of Ireland, as evidenced by the quote from Bloody Sunday of 197 2 in which 13 unarmed civilians were killed by British soldiers. The British authorities ended up trying to downplay the massacre and claimed without evidence that the murdered individuals were armed members of the IRA.

These and other events only served to exacerbate Britain's inimical image and enhanced perceptions of a state complicit in Irish repression. In this environment, latent Irish nationalism found oxygen and new fuel creating a springboard for a period of sectarian violence that would be called the Troubles, it is here that the Provisional IRA was born, separated from the official IRA, more politically oriented, and resumed the conflict over Northern Ireland. While the majority of the Troubles and associated violence would unfold in Northern Ireland, the conflict would spread to Britain and specifically London during the course of the Troubles, the IRA and its spin-off groups such as The Provisional IRA would carry out more than 500 separate attacks in England, most of them aimed at London.

These attacks would range from letter bombs to truck bomb attacks, but why did the PIRA find it politically expedient to attack London if their efforts in Ireland were not sufficient? On their own territory, they targeted unitsBritish military, members of the aristocracy and influential political figures, as well as attempting to inflict serious economic damage on the government of Northern Ireland. through bombings, most infamously a series of car bombings concentrated in 1972, the intent of these attacks was sometimes murky, although one pyrrha volunteer was quoted as saying: maybe you can't bomb a million of Protestants on a united island, but you could have fun trying which implies that, although the objective of the car bombs was ostensibly to inflict economic damage, the death of Protestants was an adjacent objective; whatever the objective, these acts of terror were devastating, they put many civilians in the line of destruction, the disorderly nature of the carbs and how often they caused large numbers of civilian casualties that sometimes came back to bite the p On July 21, 1972 22 separate car bombs were detonated in the city of Belfast by the Provisional IRA despite warnings sent by the perpetrators the scale of the attack meant that the authorities were unable to properly differentiate between Hox SCS and the real ones and generally tried too hard, as a result 11 people died and 130 were injured.

It was a public relations disaster for the nationalist movement and served to increase the resolve of the British and Northern Irish. authorities also caused disillusionment among other nationalists and a division within the P (which is crucial for the PIRA). These attacks were not worth it either. The weight of the media tension they generated in Britain, even the murder of British soldiers seemed to barely register on Richa's political scale, as one journalist put it, average Britain showed a surprising degree of apathy towards the conflict in Northern Ireland and ultimately the electorate that had to be influenced to trigger any political change let alone a complete withdrawal from Ireland, consequently to force the hand of the UK government, the PIRA would have to attack the heart, not its peripheries.

By doing so, they hope to instill fear and trapid in the country's electoral base and make them question whether the British presence in Northern Ireland was really worth the cost from 1973. 4 years after the troubles began, the PIRA would place to the British capital under sporadic siege, attacking department stores, government buildings and railway infrastructure. 10 Downing Street, the British equivalent of the White House and the world's fourth busiest airport, Heathrow, in the mortar attacks of 1991 and 1993 respectively, in the Downing Street assault P officers had parked a van a short distance away from the government headquarters and fired three mortar shells.

Through holes drilled in the top of the vehicle, these projectiles narrowly missed their target, wounding only four people, according to an official anti-terrorist quote. If the van had not been five degrees or more off its line, the three mortars would have hit 10 Downing Street; if the projectiles had been more accurate, there would have been a distinct possibility that a large British government contingent would have been killed, perhaps Once even the sitting Prime Minister, John Major, in the Heathrow episode, the mortar shells fired at the airport were fake. However, they were intended to communicate to the United Kingdom that if there was any slowdown in engagement with the PIRA, they would be able to hit prestigious targets on its territory, as well as bring the conflict and its terror closer to home, the London attacks were specifically intended to increase the literal cost of staying in Northern Ireland, the 1992 bombing of the Baltic Stock Exchange, for example, was carried out because the UK economy was going through a crisis and the insurance sector had been particularly affected. affected later, the owners of the affected buildings rushed to get their insurance. payments so they could rebuild claiming around £350 million in damages.

By comparison, the total monetary costs in Northern Ireland between 1969 and 1992 had been around £615 million. An attack in London had almost surpassed what the PR had achieved for 23 years. In Ireland itself, even more devastatingly, the British insurance sector assessed that it could no longer offer terrorism cover in light of its cost, leaving the responsibility of insuring businesses against terrorism to the government and its coffers. Insurance premiums. Rose and the government realized that their budget would not cover future losses in the event of another attack if insurers decided to ask the government for help, as a result the cost would be passed on to the taxpayer, a highly unpopular scenario that the p was prepared to According to the American historian John Boer Bell, the destruction in the heart of the city indicated more than the stopping of trains or even the explosions in Downing Street: it indicated that the problems could come at a cost that would not be easily paid. .

The explosion put the entire financial system at risk, including the The costs inflicted on the United Kingdom by the IRA's interim bombing campaign in London were between 1992 and 1996: three bombings, one outside the Baltic Stock Exchange, one at Bishop's Gate and another at the docks, amounted to almost $1.2 billion in damages. The effectiveness of these attacks in inducing the UK government to some kind of compromise is not something that is easy to determine, a kind of political poker face was often employed in negotiations of this type so as not to show possible cracks in one's proverbial armor. , however, 8 months after the Bishopsgate pyre attack.

In 1993, costing the insurance industry approximately 650 million, the UK government introduced a legally binding declaration that would allow the unification of Ireland by political means in exchange for an end to violence, provided that the majority of citizens of Ireland the North Island were in favor of unification. The relative speed with which Downing Street resorted to excessive peace actions indicates that these campaigns were becoming much more than a nuisance to the state and that prolonged conflict was unacceptable, especially for an economically conservative government in power. 100 people and the injuries of more than 2,000 over the course of 25 years. Some might find this number of victims insignificant when considering the concentrated and comparatively more fatal violence of modern terrorism, but this campaign still had victims, people whose lives were irreparably changed and their experiences cannot be reduced to a simple cold calculation.

P in London also caused its fair share of social consequences, first and foremost in the literal center of the attacks, the City of London became a heavily policed ​​Metropole as a result of pressure from the business community in 1993, they installed vehicle checkpoints, CCTV cameras were installed and random checks were instituted to create a screen against terrorism. The plan was informally dubbed The Ring of Steel, a security cordon that enveloped much of the financial sector. In total in 1996. The 2.9 square kilometer site that is the City of London hosted more than a thousand security cameras to follow the increase in mass surveillance in the rest of London.

The persistent threat of a PIR attack in London also led to a general state of fear. is summarized in this 1973 interview on the subject of letter bombs, are you concerned about the possibility of letter bombs? Well, yes, very, very anxious. Yeah, I was thinking as I was walking up the stairs that I have letters to open and I'd like to leave it to someone else because I'm really nervous about it, well, I'm just not going to take any chances if there's some package that you vaguely know about Sid about. has been warned and will not touch them in the future.

P's attacks negatively affected the expatriate Irish population in London 2, who quickly became targets of abuse. Latent prejudices about Irish backwardness, common in Britain, raised their heads with colorful epithets and, in some cases, physical abuse. Irish and even Northern Irish tenants in London were singled out. with possibility of citing Ira scum and Ira queer and in this case the tenant was forced to move out as a result of harassment, general attitudes towards the Irish in Britain during the Troubles were extremely poor to the point that British legislation ended by pointing out The Irish as potential threats to public order, the Prevention of Terrorism Act of 1974 gave incredible power to police institutions and the executive branch to detain and deport people on suspicion of terrorism or subversion, except in the case that had been born in or resided in Great Britain.

There, for at least 20 years, this effectively undermined proceedings against Irish expatriates and British citizens of Northern Ireland. The law was also problematic in that it allowed police offices to arrest and question people simply on suspicion of support for the IRA, sometimes without a warrant if someone professed support for a United Island, which may have been enough to suspect their affiliation was often left to the discretion of individual officers who may have had their own personal biases and convictions about what constituted suspicious activity in the words of political historian Paddy Hilard the. The Irish in England became a suspect community suffering under an air of hostility and discrimination due to their perceived propensity for violence and terrorism.

This video aimed to explain the issues from a new perspective using the IRA attacks in London as a lens through which to understand them. I also wanted to address a part of the history of the conflict that is not usually discussed. I didn't really want it to have an explicit argument because with a topic like this it's very easy to be forced to vilify one side over the other. The issues are an incredibly difficult topic to cover because the scars are still so fresh, as an official ceasefire between the PIRA and the UK only emerged in 1998 under the Good Friday agreement and never really resolved the Irish question or the destination of Northern Ireland. and as such, any coverage will always be accompanied by controversy.

While researching this topic I came across an article by someone called Annie Bowman, the daughter of a British soldier who died in Northern Ireland while spreading an IRA bomb. I think his perspective is perhaps the most helpful in how we should approach sectarian and nationalist issues and conflicts in general, despite his loss and the associated trauma, he was able to empathize with people on both sides of the conflict and see them as individuals who pursue their versions of justice. He saw how Ira militants may have been radicalized by the UK government's failure to take seriously their plea and the conditions Irish Catholics were expected to endure.

She understood that both sides had dehumanized each other and failed to understand the roots of the animosities and grievances of the racists shouting insults. The Irish in London were not inherently evil, but their minds were plagued by fear and ignorance and the IRA members who bombed the city did terrible things, but in their minds they were only doing what they thought was necessary to get to the top. Justice and prevent such vital violence. It is essential that these communities have outlets to engage in dialogue with each other and it is equally important that these communities feel that these dialogues are viable, who knows if Protestants and Catholics had not lived in fear of each other in 1969, perhaps it could have been reached. a conclusion. at the ballot box instead of at the point of a bayonet