Noah's Ark: The Story That Disproves the Entire Bible

They suggest that on board the ark, without modern technology and equipment, it would have been possible to survive how Mr. and Mrs. Turtle made it out of the ark alive, only God knows, but they did so five months after beginning their journey. Noah's ark finally stopped at the top of the mountain. Ararat in Turkey from the starting point to the ending point traveling in a straight line there is a distance of around 450 miles considering that it was a global flood this does not seem like a huge distance why did the ark not rest on the top of the mountain Aconcagua in Argentina or Mount Mckinley in Alaska, Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania or Mount Everest in Nepal.

You would have thought that all those mountains, along with hundreds of others that rise higher than Mount Ararat, would provide more likely destinations for the end point of Noah's Ark, but what we need. The thing to keep in mind is that the writers of this

story

had no idea any of these mountains existed. They had no idea that many of these continents existed. Their

entire

world was not our

entire

world. Could there be a more rational explanation as to why? Noah's ark ended up on top of Mount Ararat, apart from any other mountain. Well, although we said before how varied and how unrelated many of these ancient flood legends are, there is a small group of flood legends that bear a strong resemblance to each other and these all derive from ancient Mesopotamia, what is today the Iraqi floodplain in Sumeria.

Noah was known as Ziasudra in Akkad, he was known as Atrahasis in the Babylonian epic, he was known as Utnapishtim in this region when the Tigris and Euphrates rivers overflowed in the surrounding area. The land could be filled like a huge bathtub. Both geologists and archaeologists have found convincing evidence that a flood up to 22 feet high occurred here around 2900 BC. centered on the city of Shurrupak. Needless to say, many humans could have died, many animals. might have died if not for royalty or those in high places who have access to a boat, they along with their own personal collection of animals could have now survived safely above the flood waters, where was the only place relatively close to them where I have visited in person or heard about Mount Ararat, which would not be affected in any way by these flood waters.

A biblical literalist will be told not to talk that nonsense if this book says it was a global flood, it was a global flood if this book says the ark ended its journey on Mount Ararat in Turkey, then that's what happened in this book. doesn't lie, well fortunately we live in a time where we don't have to trust any person's word that the

story

is true, no. We don't even have to take the Bible at face value because there is a foolproof method to determine if the story is historically sound. What we can do is analyze the geographical dispersion of animal species throughout the planet, in theory, the closer we get to it.

Mount Ararat and Turkey and its surrounding countries, the more numerous and varied the life forms will be, the further you move from that focal point, the less numerous and less varied the animal life will be, according to IUCN mammal statistics in 2016. This is a list of the 23 countries in the world that host the most mammal species based on their geographical distance from Mount Ararat and the possibility of mammal species migrating to these places if we expect these countries to be where they are on the list. If Noah's Ark is a true story, in any case, this list reveals almost exactly the opposite of what we would expect from Turkey, Syria, Iran and Iraq, well, they are nowhere to be seen, the more questions you ask about the historicity of this story, the more you will receive the forceful answer.

Not true, organizations like the Jehovah's Witnesses are fully aware of this fact, they know how minimal and hopeless any evidence is to support this story being possible much less true, they know that if one of their members attempts to isolate and examine the historicity of this story. It could lead to their entire tower of faith collapsing and them leaving the organization, so what are they doing right? They have one last trick up their sleeve just for this occasion. Jesus Paul and Peter accepted the flood as historical and used it. As a warning, Jesus Christ clearly stated that Noah entered the ark and the flood came.

This is the best possible evidence. Jesus was in heaven before coming to earth. He watched the construction of the ark. He saw the flood. When you consider from that point of view the evidence for The Existence of Noah's Ark is already overwhelming or as my dad said, are you calling Jesus Christ a liar to an indoctrinated mind? This method of distraction works to absolute perfection, like a magician diverting the audience's attention from what is really happening. They try to divert attention. away from Noah's Ark and proving whether or not it is true Jesus Christ, a being who renounced his exalted position in heaven and suffered a truly agonizing death in order to receive eternal life, remind you that if you question the story of the flood, you are Questioning without wanting Jesus Christ himself, how dare you!?

Unfortunately for the organization, this line of reasoning produced exactly the opposite reaction within me. I had spent 25 years of my life going door to door preaching and teaching that this book is not only the inspired word of God but the inerrant word of God. when it comes to science or history, it is always 100% accurate, and yet, as one of the fundamental pieces of this book, there is a rather fallacious story, an obvious mythological adaptation, the fact that the rest of the Bible apparently includes the words of Jesus Christ himself. Referring to this story as true simply refutes my claim that it is inspired and inerrant;

In other words, my entire tower of faith did this since I left the organization. I have come to know from two people who spoke to my father on different occasions about this. story I repeatedly asked my father to examine the evidence for this story with an open mind, after my dissociation another family member took over and highlighted this story as one of the reasons they had had doubts and why who had abandoned the religion despite being hit over the head from all angles by this obviously false and plagiarized story, my father still refuses to evaluate the evidence with an open mind like him, masses of people around the world decide to remain in ignorance of science in history, preferring instead to swallow a holy book like it was Kool-Aid, other people like me were indoctrinated to be that way, but whatever the case, we no longer need to be Dark questions about whether this story is true, however, we must develop the critical thinking skills to realize that it is not.