Is Joe Rogan Confirming Terrence Howard's Theories? "He Is A Legitimate Genius"

Have you seen the guy in the speech-type interview from Empire? Yeah, yeah, so it almost seems like he's not pretending if he's pretending that he's doing a better job acting than Joakin Phoenix, well, Terence Howard, uh, the guy who interviewed me for Rolling Stone, he told me. He told me that Terence Howard is like a legit

genius

, like he talked to the guy, the guy is absolutely brilliant, maybe he realized it wasn't meaningless talk, right, he was like, oh, this is surprisingly coherent. to be something ridiculous. Let's say our DNA is made up of five elements, hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and oxygen, you know how they are organized, phosphorus is right here in the middle and you have four oxygen atoms surrounding it, then there is another phosphorus, two atoms more oxygen. now these are the legs of that double helix these are the legs now the boy steps on them they become adamine the guanine walks it and the tuina the atcgs turns out hydrogen they used to think that the energy the body transferred or understood the energetic information through the electricity, they are finding out it's through frequency, well guess what hydrogen sounds like, it's a key of E and it's yellow, that's what proper physics takes you to oxygen, it's a chartreuse and it's the key of f over F sharp, now they I used to like.

I said that information used to be considered just transmitted electrical information, but I have a question for you. Have you ever been at a party with some of your friends that you haven't seen in 10 years, but you were like 14? We hung out and there was a song you liked and everyone got up and they were live at that time now, let's say 10 years later, you have a friend with you, he's a good guy, but he wasn't there when my kids and I formed this. so when that song plays, our DNA squeezes Titans Titans, there's a particular song, a scale in the genomes for each and every one of us now, when that song plays, when your particular Prime resonance frequency plays, guess what?

What happens, your DNA celebrates and tightens everything. otherwise the harmonic wave is ejected which resequences the carbon is also the key of E and the yellow the nitrogen is G and all of these play a song so let's say the F over the F The treble of oxygen the green alone hits on an F why because there is another frequency coming from a generator over there that is changing and causing it to change, the F hits the carbon, so instead of hitting like a fshp, it hits like an F, so when It hits the carbon in an e, it doesn't hit it at all.

Okay, so the domino doesn't file, so the next domino hits wrong and now we have a Bad formation within our DNA because the frequencies are being shifted, but when we hear our tone, we tense up again, so yeah, I in the process. to build the harmonic wave sequencer with another doctor who has been able to successfully cure AIDS and cancer and is underway, but I wanted you to understand how it works, it is so simple that you don't need to destroy the human body when you can. What we do is use the frequency to return it to its normal space throughout history.

Numerous individuals who have ventured beyond the conventional paradigms of Science and Society have often found their

theories

marginalized and their voices silenced. This pattern raises crucial questions about the nature of progress and the suppression of innovative ideas. Take, for example, Nicola Tesla, whose profound

genius

revolutionized the world of physics and engineering after his death. It has been widely reported that many of his articles and research notes were confiscated by government agencies. The full extent of Tesla's work remained shrouded in mystery that fueled speculation that some of his revolutionary ideas were too transformative or too threatening to be similarly revealed to the public.

The curious case of Royal Raymond R, who claimed that his rif machine could cure cancer with frequency therapy, was met with considerable skepticism and legal challenges that led to the eventual downfall of his Critics of the research argue that his science was flawed , while supporters suggest that his work was undermined by a medical industry that felt threatened by the transfer of his claims to the realm of entertainment and social influence. Actor Terrence Howard presents a contemporary example known from his acting career. Howard's recent foray into the world of cinema. The realm of alternative physics has been greeted with both intrigue and disdain.

Whether his

theories

about the structure of DNA and its relationship to frequencies are valid is subject to scientific scrutiny, but his abrupt descent from Hollywood is surprising, suggesting a pattern in which celebrities diverging from their expected roles and championing radical ideas quickly. They find themselves ostracized. I want you to know about a 6,000-year-old secret. For 6,000 years humanity has been trying to figure out this little thing called The Flower of Life, have you ever seen this before? You know, this is one of the oldest symbols in human history. This symbol was found in the temple of Osiris in Egypt and had been molecularly burned into the wall and is 6,000 years old.

The same symbol has been found in El Prohibido. temples in China sitting under the Fufu dogs and standing on it, the Flower of Life, saying that whoever controlled that flower of life controlled the universe, there were secrets in that flower of life that D Vinci spent his entire life trying to discover, there were secrets in that flower of life that Newton spent his entire life secretly trying to discover the same secrets that Pythagoras was desperately trying to discover, but the problem was that they kept seeing this in a two-dimensional space and they couldn't get it out of this two-dimensional space. dimensional framework and as a result they were trapped in this plane, a plane.

Now, what D Vinci and all of them wanted to do, they were trying to find a way to bring this flower to life because what's inside it, apparently there was. The secrets inside it shape the mcba and all those other things outside of it. him, but they were fooled by something I think is called a straight line. You believe in straight lines. They believe that there are straight lines in the universe. Well, let me tell you. something all the energy in the universe is expressed in what is in motion if something is still there is no kinetic energy true all motion is expressed in what you look at galaxies are expressed in straight lines they are expressed in vortices all vortices are expressed in what waves all waves are curves show me a straight line in nature show me where the plutonic solids come from where they have their base in our universe are there straight lines if you look at something there are no straight lines that has been the mistake we have made?

Looking at these straight lines, this British way of thinking and overlooking the curvature of nature, so here we are back with the curvature of Nature and you have all these little pieces. This has always been an information system, so compare some of these points. Point here and say well, what is the space between all these things? Now they have said that all the spaces in between if this is the Earth and this is the Moon right here, all this space in between is filled with what emptiness, there is nothing. in the vacuum I discovered that there is something in the vacuum the fundamental elementary particles that they have been looking for in the CERN collider the hedron collider and CERN I discovered that their energy signatures matched perfectly with some of the pieces that I could To get out of here while delving into the secret of the 6,000-year-old flower of life, we discover a journey that intertwines the searches of great minds like Vinci Newton and Pythagoras with the modern rethinking of Geometry The Flower of Life, an intricate The symbol composed of multiple evenly spaced overlapping circles is more than just a fascinating design: it's a portal to ancient understanding of the universe.

Its presence in the temple of Osiris in Egypt and in temples hidden under the watchful eye of food dogs in China signals a universality. This symbol believed to represent the fundamental forms of space and time is a visual expression of the connections that life weaves through all sentient beings, hinting at the underlying Oneness of the cosmos. Terrence Howard's admiration for the symbol is not an isolated phenomenon as history tells us of great minds who also reflected on its meaning Leonardo da Vinci, a Renaissance-era scholar, is known for his extensive studies of the Flower of the Life.

Vinci's sketches reveal his fascination with their geometric perfection and his potential to unlock the secrets of the universe in a similar way to Sir Isaac Newton. In his quest to understand the gravitational force in the mechanics of the cosmos he delved into ancient knowledge and symbols, including the flower of life, he suggested that the famous discovery of gravity was part of a broader quest to decipher the cosmic puzzle embedded in the ancient symbols Pythagoras the Greek The mathematician also traveled through these mystical Realms using geometric principles to understand the harmonies of music and the structure of the universe, but what Howard brilliantly highlights is the limitation these great minds faced when confined within two-dimensional perspectives.

Despite their genius, they struggled with the depth of the symbols. unable to fully transcend its flatter representation, this is where Howard's critique of traditional British geometry opens a new avenue for understanding British geometry. The basis of much of our mathematical scientific understanding is centered on two-dimensional planes, however the universe, as Howard eloquently points out, is. Limited to the flat, it is a dance of curves, waves and multidimensional shapes, the Flower of Life thus becomes a gateway to understanding the curvature of nature. When we look at the spirals of galaxies or the intricate patterns of a nautilus shell, we don't see straight lines. but curves, this understanding has profound implications suggesting that the Universe operates not only in the Realms of the flat and linear but in Dimensions that our ancestors possibly attempted to communicate through symbols such as the flower of life.

Howard's speech resonates with modern scientific understanding of the universe. the curved space-time continuum, a fundamental concept in Einstein's theory of relativity. It echoes this ancient wisdom. The curvature of space and time around massive objects like stars and galaxies is not just theoretical, it is observable. The warping of light around massive objects, known as gravitational lensing, is observable. A testament to the curved nature of the universe, Howard's ideas find parallels in the realm of quantum physics. The elusive nature of elementary particles, their existence in probabilities rather than defined positions, aligns with the idea of ​​a universe beyond straight lines and predictable paths.

This is where Howard's theory comes in. about finding something in the void the void becomes particularly intriguing the void often thought of as empty space could be teeming with these fundamental particles, invisible threads that weave the fabric of the universe, the flower of life, therefore it is not not just an ancient symbol but a representation of the universe. Deeper Secrets The 6,000-year-old secret isn't just about a geometric pattern, it's about the very nature of reality itself. It is a symbol that has transcended millennia. Bridging the gap between ancient wisdom and modern scientific understanding. I've spent 45 years looking for these. things and trying to figure out how the universe really works and we come to discover that the Universe are abandoning the standard model the ideas of black holes and dark matter for an electrical model of the universe there are tons of paperwork Da Vinci works on the Flower of the Life and he tries to unravel it, but in every existence, in every example, you see him making straight lines and trying to make these straight lines bend inwards and therefore he was never able to open them because the whole universe is curved. all space is curved and as a result what I was doing in trying to find these straight lines I abandoned the idea of ​​the straight line, the shortest distance between two points is curved space because you can't force your way straight through the space, not even electricity while moving. from a southern plane to a northern plane it always goes northeast in its direction and magnetism as it expands goes southwest and that's the spin, that's how you always know if it's magnetism or electricity, It's the turn, is it northeast or southwest, but?

In trying to define the spaces, it allowed me to see that all of these in-between spaces that we've been dealing with are these pedals, all of humanity has dealt with these pedals, but it's these other forms that we've constantly ignored. Well, those other ways. They were the spaces in between, they were the things that filled the void of space and all these particles that I have, I think they are the complete proof of that and it is also the complete proof of the argument of thewave particle at the heart of this exploration. lies the fundamental principle that all energy in the universe is in perpetual motion, this motion manifesting itself in vortices, waves and spirals rather than straight lines.

Modern physics with its study of galaxies and celestial bodies supports this view. Galaxies are not arranged in straight paths but in eddies. Spirals and elliptical orbits, a pattern imitated in the structure of the DNA helix and the spiral arms of hurricanes. Howard's perspective resonates deeply with this view, which suggests a universal pattern of movement and energy that is curved and cyclical. Wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics. A concept that posits that particles are discrete entities and probabilistic waves further illustrates this deviation from straight-line thinking. This duality challenges our conventional understanding of motion and trajectory by proposing that at the fundamental level the universe is expressed in probabilities and patterns that define a direct categorization that moves from the macrocosmic to the microcosmic.

We delve into the curves of Nature searching for the essence. From the universe, this chapter explores how the natural world embodies the nonlinear curved geometry that Howard emphasizes from the majestic course of rivers to the delicate curl of a fern front. Nature abounds in curves and spirals. These patterns are not arbitrary but follow principles. Mathematics such as fractal geometry and the Fibonacci sequence fractal geometry with its self-repeating patterns offers a window into the infinite complexity of nature these fractals are evident in the branches of trees the structure of snowflakes and the steep contours of mountain ranges the Fibonacci sequence another mathematical pattern is manifested in the arrangement of the seeds of a sunflower, the spirals of the shell of a snail and the proportions of the human body, these patterns reveal a hidden order in nature, an order that transcends the straight lines of British geometry.

Howard's perspective on the absence of straight lines in nature aligns with these. Through observations by recognizing the curved and recursive patterns that govern the natural world, we gain insight into the essence of the universe. These patterns are not mere coincidences, but reflect deeper universal principles that govern the structure of growth and movement of everything in the cosmos as we go deeper. As we delve deeper into this exploration, we prepare to find a concept that further challenges the conventional understanding of mathematics and its application to the physical world. Terrence Howard in his insightful speech presents us with a fascinating aspect of this hidden order: the concept of mathematical loops, this intriguing idea exemplified by the circular behavior of the square root of two reveals an unexpected and apparently paradoxical nature of mathematical operations our planet is is moving away from our sun at 6 Ines per year you know that 15 cm a year our planet moves away from the Sun So, in less than half a billion years, our planet will be outside the Goldilocks Zone, it will be somewhere near where Mars is somewhere halfway between there, so life will no longer be able to sustain itself on this planet, so if we are going to be able to sustain ourselves as a species we have to become interstellar, not just interplanetary, you have to become interstellar but not with approximations. you can go interstellar you can't go interstellar with a point that will take you here with a straight line when the real event is taking place here when you go 600 quadrillion miles you can't make a mistake you need precision and that's what mathematics is about but all these conjugations of waves all these states of matter all these things there It's time for that to change, now we have changed all our buildings to be streamlined.

Our planes are no longer based on a two-dimensional British way of life, but our mathematics is still based on a two-dimensional way and I believe. In order for us to get to the future, we have to examine: Do you know about loops in mathematics? Do you believe in loops? Do you know the square root of two? Do you think it's a loop? Do you think the square of two? is the square root of two. I want everyone to take out their phone for a minute and then we'll do one thing: put it in the calculator and turn it to the side so you can get all the long numbers out.

Now I want you to put two and take the square root of two, take the square root and you will get 1.414 213- 562 37395 dot dot dot right now I want you to do the cube a favor for me, it will be seen there. x to 3 you see 2828 4271 2174 6190 now that makes sense I want you to do me a favor divide it by two I have that number cover it again divide it by two cover it again and I want you to do that until the end of your lives and that number will continue to come out with 2828 4271 2174 6190 any other number above two that you put and cubes and squares Cubes and squares and divided by two by six operation has moved to an exponential number that you can't even imagine any number less than two that you do the same with operation will go into an exponentially small issue and the number this is what we call a loop is illogical it doesn't make sense and doesn't make the math make sense so these are some things that I'm bringing to the four that I would like to question.

I would like to audit mathematics, the world of mathematics and I would like to audit how we view Platonic solids because I think the new wave conjugations will tell a better story of how our world works and I think it's time to start from the beginning and walk through this, so the question for the Church of Truth, Love and Consciousness and all who listen. Does a dollar multiplied by a dollar equal $1 or does a dollar multiplied by a dollar equal $2? I have never seen anywhere in the universe where an action multiplied by an action does not have a reaction, so that is why we must discuss this and examine it. and how did they come up with this weird number, which is illogical because an area a lint multiplied by a lint has to have an area, so you can't have one equal to one because now what happened to length multiplied by the length? is the area that no longer exists Taran begins by posing an intriguing question: money cannot be multiplied or if a penny multiplied by a penny equals what, since the penny is no longer based on the hard asset of gold and is now based on an imaginary value that is equal to a virtual value of the integers or numbers then follows one cent * 1 cent equal to 1 cent according to the rules of current mathematics and multiplication 1 cent * 1 cent equal to two cents according to the laws from universal mathematics 1 Penny * 1 Penny is equal to 0.01 according to a calculator one cent times one cent 0.01 * 0.01 = 0.1 makes one cent * one cent equals 1 cent according to the multiplication rules or makes one cent times one cent equal to 0.00001 according to our current decimal system a value so small that there is not even a coin circulated for that amount by the US Department of the Treasury.

All of the calculations shown here are reasonable forms of multiplication, but which one is still consistent with the universal phenomena observed. How would you like his money to be calculated in five cents? a nickel is equal to what a nickel is equal to 5 cents so a nickel a nickel should also be equal to a quarter of a nickel a nickel according to the calculator is 05 * 05 = .25 again a value so small that there is no currency in circulation to represent it, how would you like your money to be calculated? a dime once a dime is equal to what a dime is equal to 10 cents a dime once a dime should be equal to 10 cents once 10 cents 10 cents * 10 cents equals 100 cents which is equal to a dollar but a dime a dime equals a cent according to a calculator 0.10 * 0.10 equals 0.01 how would you like your money to be calculated?

What is a quarter * a quarter? A quarter is equal to 25 cents, therefore A4 * A4 = 25 cents. * 25 cents, which is equal to 625 cents, which is $6.25 but a quarter * a quarter according to the calculator is 0625 .25 * .25 = 0625 How would you like to calculate your money? Let me clarify if 4 over 2 is the inverse operation of 2. * 2 equals 4, then it would naturally follow that 2 id 1 or 2 over one is the inverse operation of 1 * 1 equals two, so let's talk about this What does your common sense tell you about these two scenarios? What do they have in common? what are their differences division the number four is divided by two twice and the truth is that the number two is divided by one twice the proof of that if you had two dollars and you divided them between two people you would have to give each person $1 in order to be even add two + 2 = 4 and 1 + 1 = 2 subtract 4 - 2 = 2 and 2 - 1 = 1 multiplication 2 * 2 = 4 and 1 * 1 equals 1 does that make sense to anyone? which seems to be following a similar line of congruence, I mean can you see where the error occurred?

Both scenarios are identical in every way, the only difference exists only in the dimension, if they add, subtract and divide according to the same proportion, then they must also multiply according to the same proportion simply and plainly, if 2 over 1 is inconsistent with 1*1 equals 1, although 4 over 2 is consistent with 2*2 equals 4, then it should follow that 2^2 = 4, which it does and 1 sared equals 2, however, the community Mathematics and science tells us that common sense and logic are wrong in this case due to a product of an arbitrary convention called the identity property, let's analyze yes.