Galaxy S20 vs iPhone 11 Pro! Camera Test Comparison

This is my

camera

comparison

test

of the new Samsung Galaxy S20 with the iPhone 11 Pro. I'm Ben from Authentech, let's get into it now. I bought both phones with my own money, without sponsorship, in today's video, starting with a front view. in the 4k 30 video now, I deliberately didn't buy that S20 Ultra for some reasons: it's too expensive and bulky for my pockets, also, that's what all the other youtubers have already reviewed, but I think it's the s20 where you get the Bigger benefit. your bang for your buck, especially for the average consumer right off the bat, both selfie

camera

s shoot nice, sharp 4K video, which I like to see, the iPhone has a wider field of view on this lens, although I prefer the skin tones of the iPhone are a bit unstable.

Since this is a common thing on iPhones, my skin in real life is not as red or as smooth, while the s20 looks a little more precise and flat. As for dynamic range, the iPhone in the past has always been the clear winner, but it finally looks like the s20 has really upped its game and is also doing a fantastic job of maintaining some colors and clarity and the super contrast that you've seen with those bright sunlight and areas of dark shadows and blacks on my jacket. Now I'm going to do a quick running stabilization

test

. the s20 seems to be the winner here, while it's still moving back and forth we can see a lot more wobbles and shakes than the iPhone has, so I like to keep an eye on objects in the background and on the horizon to see which is more stable and which one. you guys like it better this is an audio test on the

galaxy

s 20 and this is audio on the 11pro now we have some waterfalls behind me we have the train running in the background how does the audio sound and does it compare between the two tests audio one two three four left live an authentic audio test one two three four let's live off that technology.

I would say that the s20 is doing a slightly better job at reducing wind and ambient noise, however, it is a little too loud for my taste and is making my voice sound a little tinny and flat, the iPhone is giving us voices a lot. louder and more natural-sounding, however, it is at the cost of stronger wind and background noise. We jump into a photo

comparison

, starting with some selfies, now certainly both cameras. They've been some of my favorites I've had in years and I don't think you can go wrong with either one in these shots.

Notice that there is a little more natural background blur on the s20, which I like when I switch to portrait. mode on each I think they both look pretty good with pretty nice edge detection and again the iPhone is making my skin a little reddish while the s20 has that more natural and real look now switch to the settings With rear-facing triple cameras, these are really fun to compare side by side and I've always been a big fan of the ultra-wide-angle lens that creates that cool, immersive perspective. The main lens of each is 26 millimeters, both with 12 megapixels F 1.8.

They both look great and sharp with beautiful colors good dynamic range white balance and clarity fantastic looking it's honestly crazy for a smartphone camera and as for the telephoto lens this is where it gets a little tricky the s20 is what Samsung calls it a three times hybrid optical zoom and basically What I don't think many people realize, including here, is where the 64 megapixel camera is and as for the lens, well, it's just a little bit more field of view narrower than the main lens, so all that extra zoom range is now mostly digital zoom. This isn't necessarily a bad thing because with the same 64 megapixels this s20 can also shoot K video, which I had no idea 8k was only on the s20 ultra, but it's also here in all of these shots as I keep zooming in on the zoom.

You'll see that the iPhone maxes out at 10x the zoom, the s20 can go up to 30x and while it still gets quite pixelated and somewhat unusable at that extent, we can clearly see how much sharper it looks like 20 on the iPhone, It's like the difference between day and night and again, just because the camera allows us to zoom up to 30x doesn't mean we have to, but going third or half produces great shots for my eyes if I stay with the 10x zoom. The maximum is an incredible range and 0.5 to 10 times the images and even the video as you'll see in a minute look really good and look at this as I zoom in on the center map it's really fun and impressive to see how much further.

The clarity we have on this 20 with all those extra megapixels will work for us. I've heard rumors that the upcoming iPhone 12 pro could have a 64-megapixel sensor. It would be cool to see it when we zoom out on the ultra wide and primary. lens I think they both looked pretty amazing. This was another fun example of switching lenses and sensors from ultra-wide to ultra-zoom on that rocket. It's a big difference in resolution. Now talking about those 64 megapixels, this was another great feature. I hadn't heard anyone really talk about it and on the s20 we can take full resolution photos at 64 megapixels, so with the 4 by 3 ratio this is a resolution of 92 48 by 69 36.

At first I thought it was a bit cheesy and maybe a party trick but I was wrong as soon as I took some side by side photos compared to the 12 megapixel iPhone and then started zooming in there is again a big difference in terms of sharpness, clarity and resolution at the end of the day, although there are only megapixels. Go that far and there are many other important features I like to focus on, like the dynamic range in this flower photo. It's a good example, we can see these little white specks on the flower which I think are pollen dots, which is surprising for the s20, however the exposure is reduced on some of those key details.

Here are some low light shots first on the ultra wide lens and the dumb iPhone can't do night shots with the ultra wide lens while the s20 s looks really good. The competition is evened out a bit. on the main lens, but the iPhone still leans too much towards white bounce, while the s 20 hits it more accurately with clean white LED light, plus it's sharp and attractive, and the telephoto lens will be another win for the s 20 in my opinion and although the iPhone shot doesn't look terrible, I feel like the S 20 looks a little sharper.

This is a rear facing 4k 30 video test that has to look at and compare with ultra wide angle honestly, as you will see in the video. The images from both phones produce really beautiful shots whose sharpness and clarity look good in both ultra smart mode and even the colors and dynamic range are nice too, although I noticed that in just a few specific examples here, the iPhone's video wins by better HDR, just look. in crazy bright sunlight for example, and the magnified circle is smaller on the iPhone, however, a big caveat whenever there's motion involved, like moving the camera around the iPhone, HDR causes some pretty gnarly HDR flickering which I've mentioned before and which can It looks pretty bad, sometimes it's a lot harder to notice on the s20 while I'm out here running.

I would vote that ultra-wide iPhones produce slightly smoother stabilization. It's funny that it's Samsung that has promoted that super stable mode and I'll complain. about this again, it's only for 1080p video, even on this model 20 it doesn't work in 4k which is a big bummer. Now I don't understand why we can't have super stable 4k on that 64 megapixel sensor that can record up to 8k. video, there's plenty of canvas resolution for EIS, well if 1080p doesn't bother you then the super stable s20 produces some pretty interesting, smooth, almost gimbal-like shots, which is fun to use and keep going while zooming in documents.

I would say that the iPhone's 2x telephoto lens still looks very good and the s20 has greater reach and zoom, which may be a good option to switch to the main lens. Both again look great, the HDR and colors look good and when running I would say the s20 has too many flaws in its stabilization, while the iPhone looks a bit softer, it still has that bad HDR flickering effect. I'd really like to see improved optical image stabilization on both phones at this point, let me pause quickly. and I'll show you the comparison between the lights and the falloff between the reflection of my shiny skin and the sunlight and I would personally vote that the iPhone looks a little better.

The s20 is blowing too much off my skin. Here's another shot that starts ultra wide in the middle. lens and then the telephoto lens and although the s20 has that wider zoom range it just looks good sometimes it's not an optical zoom whereas an iPhone has that twox telephoto lens so it can still produce good clarity in that 2x range, it's funny because 99% of the time, when these photos or videos will be shared on smartphones and social networks, no one will notice the difference in my patent-pending autofocus test, the results are so similar that I have to slow down the footage and frame it per frame I could notice that the s20 responded faster to start searching for focus, but interestingly it was the iPhone that most often snapped and locked onto the precise focus plane for just a few frames faster than the s20, but sometimes at ISO there you have it.

As for slow motion, both cameras can record up to 240 FPS at 1080p and I think I like the quality of the s20 a little more, but for bonus points, the 20 can also record up to 960 fps, that's almost a thousand frames per second. I can literally count and see the individual water specks which is pretty impressive now that the resolution is only 720p but I'll still take it and we can't forget a little low light video starting with the ultra wide and they both look very dark and Grainy, however the iPhone makes a lot of noise if you can see it, also the white balance is disabled again on the main lens.

I would vote for the s20 as the winner as it looks a little more realistic and strikes a solid balance between color sharpness and noise reduction jumping to the telephoto lens the results are simply magnified while neither looked great on this super dark room I'd say 1920's clarity wins by just a hair final results who do you think is the winner? It's pretty close. I think I would say four photos. I would probably go with the s20, now they were all shot on Auto and between the different lenses, the full 64 megapixel resolution and I couldn't even show you the full manual controls that we have on the s20. app which I think is much better than the iPhone and when it comes to video it's almost a toss up, 8k videos locked at 24 FPS on the s20 and the autofocus and jello effects are pretty bad so it's not so usable unless locked. -no tripod but the 4k 30 looks really great in every HDR and the saturation is beautiful, the autofocus is very close, the s20 has manual video exposure controls which is really amazing.

Personally, I'll be sticking with the s20 for at least a few more weeks for my in-depth review, be sure to keep an eye on that as I've been using the iPhone for the last six or nine months so it would be really interesting to see all the pros and cons, plus stay tuned for my other s20 Versa note 10 plus and google pixel camera comparisons until I see them next time, let's live authentic