YTread Logo
YTread Logo

Every Pixar Theory EVER Made and How They ALL CONNECT! [COMPILED THEORY]

Jun 03, 2021
Hello, this video is

made

up of

ever

y part of the extremely long and confusing Pixar multiverse

theory

that I have been creating for the last three years. This compilation video organizes them, puts them all in the correct order and makes it easier to watch and enjoy. Pixar tends to do. their films with four demographic groups in mind: children who will enjoy the film for what it is, adults who will approve of the underlying message, critics who will criticize the impeccable animation and technical aspects and, finally, a demographic that most filmmakers do not They choose the observant people to observe the secrets of the little universe

they

have created, I mean just look at John Negroni and his Pixar

theory

, it's pretty cool and shows that, well, Pixar has these people in mind, luckily I'm one of them. the people who strive to unearth tradition. and so, after scanning the film from the inside out very carefully, I found secrets that line up with things that many other people have been saying and I think I'm close to finally piecing together some of Pixar's biggest mysteries.
every pixar theory ever made and how they all connect compiled theory
Hi, I'm the ER theorist. and I hope you like my new introduction. I n

ever

got a chance to talk about it in my last video, but I've been stuck on this theory long enough. Let's get into it as we scan from the inside out for clues and hints. I found something. which as far as I know no one has noticed yet, Ellie above is framed in Riley's childhood home and to be more precise, the exact same picture that Carl and Ellie had in their house at this time, we know that Pixar It is far from doing something random.
every pixar theory ever made and how they all connect compiled theory

More Interesting Facts About,

every pixar theory ever made and how they all connect compiled theory...

We have to take a moment to consider what this really means when a framed image is seen recurrently, it usually means that a family has continued the tradition of sharing that same image. Yes, as crazy as it may seem, I believe that the Anderson family is related to the Fredrickson family and this is just a theory of course, not a fact, so not

every

thing will line up perfectly. You see, Ellie's family is like a hub for Pixar secrets. There have been many theorists on the subject, mainly the super Carlin brothers. YouTube channel, but I guess I'll get into this long, long story too Emma Jean Emma Jean is the name of a woman found to be the sender of a postcard sent to Carl and Ellie Frederickson.
every pixar theory ever made and how they all connect compiled theory
This card, interestingly enough, can be found on Andy. Davis's bedroom and even stranger on its walls in John Carlin's interview with Up director Pete Doctor revealed that Emma Jean was a previous love interest of Carl Fredricksen. He said that before Ellie he had Emma and that after marrying Ellie everyone was still good. friends and what still perplexes everyone to this day is that in Toy Story 3 you see that letter addressed by her on Andy's wall why is it so out of place and completely random, nothing is random with Pixar a time Pete revealed who she was.
every pixar theory ever made and how they all connect compiled theory
I stopped trying to figure things out even though it was only half resolved and today I am going to finish this long awaited answer How are these families related? I'm so excited because it's time to make my favorite thing, a fun family tree. In fact, I used ancestry.com to trace my family back several generations and managed to include 3,500 people. Oh, and for those Once Upon a Time fans, don't worry when season six ends. I'll be back in that tree. That thing is a mess okay I'm digressing let's start with the basics Carl and Ellie Fredrickson are married Carl had a previous love interest with Emogene Andy Davis is the son of a man and Jennifer Davis yes that's her official name from Pixar and yes, I realized there was a very popular theory that she is Emily, the girl from Jessi's past, but it's also just a theory and her official name goes against that theory anyway, the other girl , Molly Davis, Riley Anderson is the daughter of Jill and Bill Anderson on the inside.
Our essential guide reveals this. The only strange things I noticed while scanning the film is that Jill's credit card says kay and Anderson, but I may mention that another day also on the wall is a certificate from a man named William Anderson. short for William, ergo their names are officially Jill and Bill Anderson, so we have our three separate trees and now we must find a way to

connect

Imogene to the Davises and the elite to the Andersons, which is no easy task not at all, as I said above. The pictures are ones usually given to extended family members, so we know that in the inside out moment, Ellie is old, just like Riley is young, great, what are the possible combinations here?
Well, Ellie can't exactly have kids, so that's out of the question. The question is, but she can adopt and we see how important children are to her and Carl, but we never see or notice any children in the entire movie and we just need more to prove it, so let's quickly try the other trees . It's Jen Davis. the daughter of Emma Jean and Carl Fredricksen well, that was a bomb. I just launched Shirley. Many have considered this, although we can finally try it and in fact, we can also place Jill here because she is not fully visible. like she's going to be adopted, okay, if you're a little lost, okay, I'll explain this part right now, we're trying to prove that Jill and Jennifer are Coral and Emma's daughters number one, it should be assumed that Emma Jean and Carl Fredricksen actually had a son.
The timing for this is appropriate, but not appropriate, like the size of your clothes, more like the fit of a pair of skinny jeans, it works, but it feels a little uncomfortable unless you're this guy who looks like too much. comfortable, but the only jeans we will deal with today are the Emma type. You see, Karl was born in 1931 and he and Ellie married when he was in his 20s or 30s. There's certainly still time to be with Emma Jean and definitely. have children, but it feels a little strange if these women are 40 years old, it actually works like a charm, and do you know what

they

seem to be so timely, although doubtful it still checks number deux au genetics, I can't forget them and so on?
I'll be frank with you all, oops, sorry, I said pointedly again, the genetics here match up, but you guys hate when I deal with genes, so the only jeans we'll be dealing with today are Emma's. kind regardless of my repeating deoxyribonucleic puns Carl's eye color is identical to Miss Davis's eye color and is blue a rare trait his hair color is also the same when not old Carl had brown hair roots of Miss Davis are brown she just changes her style a lot so Emma and Carl's children would certainly match the genes we see and the timing of them also fits and that always helps but the real question is why does Andy Davis have a postcard from his grandmother and her new husband to his grandfather and his new wife on his wall why it is so important to him and yet where does the framed photo of Elly in Jill's house fit into all this and the question in everyone's mind who is Andy's father and as you will see, we solved a couple of questions? but now we have three more, this is going to get very complicated very quickly, we know that Emma's jeans card implies that she is away and that she is with someone else.
Andy has pegged her like she's actually worth something, why is there who Emma is with now? great for questions now, but if I must, here's a quick summary of what we've covered or tried to cover so far after Jennifer and Jill Emma and Karl broke up, Karl then married his childhood best friend, Emma moved on, but like Pete said in John's interview. They remained good friends and Emma got married, we don't know, but what I find most important here is that the time they got married and divorced and all that was in the '50s according to Pete and what do we know happened?
In the 50's, Woody and his gang were created. This all goes back to his father, as it is very likely that Andy gave Woody his missing father. This is too complicated, but I refuse to back down from this like I have others. I'm so into this topic right now that it's driving me crazy. Pixar has broken me and this couldn't be more perfect and just to clarify, we know that the Andersons are related through Jill and are not billed since they would have the last name Frederickson. if it were Bill Jennifer Davis and Jill Anderson maiden names Fredrickson are Emma and Carl Fredrickson's two children Emma's maiden name is Jean divorces his wife due to unspecified complications Carl later marries Ellie, everyone is still friends, however, now we have not necessarily the correct answer but the one that best fits the setup of these three families and yes, without going into it too much, this entire family follows the rare trait and most of them have blue eyes like the Grandpa Carl.
Some people - yes, this includes the Carlin brothers - have wondered why Riley looks so. drastically different from his parents, well genes can skip generations, this is also seen in Molly Davis who has similar genes, you know, the blonde and the blue eyes, but her mother has none of that and Carl meets the requirements with his blue eyes as unique. The questions we have now are who is Andy's father, who is Emma Jeans' partner, and why does Andy have a letter from his grandmother and her new husband to his grandfather and his new wife? Those are the hardest ones to understand and I have no answer, but I can think at the moment losing his father due to a clearly recent breakup is something that would take its toll on Andy, naturally, that's how it is with any divorce, especially an obviously nasty one like um, no sign of a father at all, it's almost like Jennifer erased it. the house of everything that was his and her, making it almost impossible to decide who the father is.
Sorry Maury, this is even beyond your capabilities. However, you'll see I said it's almost impossible since Andy has been in such a dark and random relationship. postcard in his room. I have reason to believe that she is somehow related to his father and Emma creates a new love interest. This is just an idea to quickly think about. Andy's grandparents gave him their postcard to give him hope of seeing his father again and to show him that it was possible for the separated parents to stay happy with each other, that a recovery is a possibility, that's all. that a child would need in such a situation.
Yeah that's what I'm going with and who Mr. Davis is, we all know he would keep the Davis last name with him so all we have to do now is scan all the Pixar movies looking for someone or something with the Last name Davis, well, naturally, I found absolutely nothing, maybe find out who Andy is. Dad just isn't something I'm meant to be, but I'm not going to give up that easily. What I want you, the viewers, to do is scan the films if you can and be sure to comment on who you think he is. looking for someone preferably with blue eyes and brown hair who lives in the tri county area, if you can't find a real character do some analysis and look for anything in the movies that davis says, we can figure this out, it needs to be answered or in the least resolved for this theory, it is possible that it could be Bill Anderson, but the timing is not evidence of his convenience and that would be good, just plotting and deviating from it, hanging would probably kill Bill and now who is he referring to Emogene when he says we who?
Is she there now? This is as difficult to solve as The Strange Case of Mr. Davis, but who should we be before this moment? Well we have to look for an old man with an old woman in a Pixar movie, that's literally it, if you can find that in any of these movies we can use other chains of evidence to possibly

connect

everything again now go out and find mr. Davis and Imaging and her partner Last, but certainly not least, since it was the basis of this entire video, why does Emma's daughter have her stepmother framed in her house?
Because she's her stepmother, a major impact on her life, a mother figure who probably lives closer to her than Emma based on the Pixar tree and that line about wishing you were here I finally checked out the wedding scene and for me surprise, I certainly found something Emma Jean, maybe if she really is friends with these people, she is more likely to be. at her wedding and with a new man there in the front row is completely possible and what is this, a daughter maybe who knows. I'll come back to this when I have enough information to successfully conclude some theories, so after the many videos from youtubers like John. and videos by Ben Carlin Seamus Gorman and Watsa a few months ago I decided to build my own theory around the concept of Pixar's Emogene mystery.
I found a framed picture of Ellie from Riley's house inside out. Watch that video first by clicking on the small white rectangular box that now appears in the upper right corner of the screen, but to largely summarize, Pixar's mystery woman was someone I linked to as part of a large family that unitedToy Story from top to bottom and although the concepts of that videos are a little unlikely, that doesn't mean it's not fun to come back to because if you haven't noticed yet with my channel, what I do is not exactly theorizing, it's more well a story that I create and then apply. with evidence, I think that's what viewers enjoy the most, so since this video received a lot of requests to do the follow up I promised, I feel obligated to do so, so let's start with one of the most important questions I asked at the end from my video, who is Andy's father?
Well, I got some interesting answers. Andy's dad is a peanut. The father is Woody. That's why Andy is so attached. Let's say Jennifer had fun. Baby. Andy's mother is his father. What happened is that his father went crazy and killed his son. Mom, now he's doing his skinned and decaying face gimmick, this is so ridiculous and he's dead, he's like Marlin from Nemo, but there were some such strange answers that really

made

me think, so indulge me for a moment while I explain a ton. of incredibly interconnected but somewhat improbable and bizarre theories from commenters, some of which got a lot of likes, now surprisingly the concept of Al from Al's Toy Barn being the father is intriguing, dozens of people suggested this on the comments section and I realized.
In making the video, Al seems to have direct ties to Woody in the same way that I deduced that Andy's father would have the genetics mostly tied together, but common sense people like the chicken man and possibly the homicidal black widow, They are not vapid misanthropes. The foolishness of the toy boy is still rampant throughout these comments, but the idea is still quite interesting now, there is a new theme, something I hadn't thought about when I wrote the script, but apparently dozens of viewers pointed out that an old man that we see recurring in Pixar films, also known as Gary.
Gary Garrett guray, yes, Jerry from Gary's game Gary Jerry, the same man who fixes Woody in Toy Story 2 is an older guy who apparently fits the bill for Emma Jeans' second love interest, however, like some people Smarter people pointed out, Emma Jeans' letter doesn't actually imply a love interest just that maybe she could be with someone, so who could be okay? Hopefully this video will narrow things down for you guys to find out in the comments section. I guess this video is more just to narrow things down. more than a full part, more of a... a 1.5, just kind of a middle of the road type theory, but you see, dear viewers, this is an interesting comment right here, this person suggested that it's good that maybe the Andy's father left Jennifer because she cheated on him. him to have Molly, this is the worst possible way for a breakup to happen, fooling all the signs where something of Andy's father is missing from the walls and these obsessives tying up his toys and finally Molly's abnormal traits, that light blonde hair.
She doesn't look anything like the rest of her family, but a father who might have blonde hair would produce a daughter with different genes, and if we assume the breakup was that nasty, do you know what that means? It means that Jennifer is very likely to change both of them. from her children's last name to hers, which means that I have been doing all this wrong and that we should not be looking for a man with the last name Davis, but something completely different, maybe there were two fathers in this family, all of that reinforces my Black Widow Statement from earlier, so who is the father or, more accurately, who are the parents?
Bill Anderson, it's getting creepier and creepier now, this comment here is a mouthful. Could Emma Jean be Ellie's sister? Well, we're never given her maiden name. and the woman in the audience at her wedding who could possibly be Emma clearly shares genetic similarities with Ellie, so I don't know if it's likely, but it kind of twists things for poor Cara Lynn, the girl who passes this person off which states that on the Andis shelf. There were signs of some kind of Boy Scouts, so we'll never know if he might have ties to Russell, but maybe Russell's father will never be around because he lives an alternate life with the Davis family or maybe the Anderson family.
I mean, the genes match, but they don't. No, I would never base a theory around all of this, but the concepts are there and my intention is to spread ideas for commenters who can contribute to the solution and there are many other comments here that I will post. screen right now, but basically this video was made as a direct continuation of the previous one to spread more and more ideas because we are so close to finding out how all these Easter eggs are connected. What intrigues me most is who. Russell's parents really are, but I'll do that for another day.
I promise to warn you before you watch this video to know that it is very different from my usual videos. It's mostly a psychological analysis of a real-life statement from a Pixar writer and isn't that much like what I normally do, but I'm sure you've seen Pixar movies before. Hopefully, if you click on this, you've already seen my Pixar Family Tree video, and if you haven't, you should watch it too. You can watch part two for more information, but basically we're still figuring out this family tree. I made it that ties Inside Out and Toy Story together and uses darkly mind-blowing threads of evidence drawn from all three films.
He left some questions unanswered. However, and the other video I made shared some of his ideas, but the big question about who Andy's father is was apparently answered by a man interviewed by the Carlin super brothers, watched his video, it's a stellar surprise, but something It happened later, so today I am. I'm going to psychologically break things down to their almost atomic level trying to figure out what's going on with all of this. Hello, I am the theory sir, and after the Super Carlin brothers live video, it went semi viral and they also told it to the man they interviewed. all the underlying information about Andy's father provided by his friend during a lunch chat.
I think his friend was one of the guys that worked on Toy Story as one of the main guys that worked on it. This mind-blowing video quickly caught the attention of Andrew Stanton, one of the other writers and creators you see, the Pixar friend who relayed the information to Mike Mozart, Carling's super consultant, was actually Joe Ramped, a Pixar writer. who passed away some time ago. Andrew Stanton then posted a tweet that he attempted to refute. This hugely surprising version of the story and it was kind of like this complete and utter fake news, everyone go home, there's nothing to see here folks, hashtag I was there, but if he debunked it on his Twitter, then what? why the man in the Super Carlin brothers video talks about it and discusses this.
Is he lying? No, there is no way, so how do we explain this? We can analyze this tweet in three different possible ways and yes, I'm going to do just that, or he's saying it. the truth and is a little upset with the viral nature of fake news or his statements sheer brevity and bluntness could indicate his annoyance at the revelation of something that was supposed to be kept secret until Toy Story 4 or maybe he was simply ahead of the joe raft canon or a discarded idea and would be retconned in Toy Story 4. The third possibility is that he is lying and trying to use reverse psychology to make a joking statement judging by the word choice because he knew that readers of the tweet would enter a spiral of analysis as if they were the same readers. of your tweet are the ones who would do this type of analysis in the first place, but if you were incredibly smart, it could have been double reverse psychology and your knowledge of how people would analyze your statement was a precious intention in your final decision to Write it the way in that he did it based on his intelligence.
I don't think he has any reason to go any deeper than that based purely on the context of his reasons why he's one of the guys who makes those crazy Easter eggs fill his stories at Pixar and from that I can say I wouldn't go any further. of this, so to solve my theory we need to know what it is: the cold hard truth, a cold hard lie, reverse psychology or double reverse psychology, which is Well, first we have to look more analytically at his choice of words. He agreed? He wrote so fast. Did you write this slowly?
Where did he write this meticulously? By specifically choosing words using a tool known as eka fun, we can see where he is. The tweet was sent based on their analysis of the source code, this tweet was sent at 2:38 p.m. on June 24, 2017 from his iPhone, so this narrows things down a bit since we know he was on the go and was probably spammed with the Super Carlin brothers fan video, but the article he linked in his tweet, however, was from io9, who posted. his article two hours before Andrew Stanton tweeted Now two things could be happening here: he saw the article from something as big as io9 as the straw that broke the camel's back after spam or he just found out about his article after seeing it on io9.
The problem is that he would have spammed the video, so it's much more likely that he took this as the last straw. However, that's still two days after receiving messages, emails and tweets directed at him. If he responded today, the super Carlin brothers posted it. On June 22 he would have indicated that he was obsessively after squashing the idea, probably because it was true, except he didn't, so it is more likely that he was informed from the 23rd, a day later, this is the day when if he had responded, I would have considered it normal, but his tweet would have been worded differently, in a more calm and mature way, so it was incorrect news, but the fact that it was published two days after The fact that io9 published it also indicates this.
To me his sarcasm is a very carefully chosen composition, even if this makes little sense to some of you, the mere fact that he tweeted a couple of hours after io9's post is quite interesting or maybe this is just psychoanalysis since his sarcasm was carefully chosen. However, sarcasm is most likely the case and he was on the move due to the fact that his iPhone was the posting platform, which tells us that yes, it most likely wasn't a cold truth or lie. and hard, but a cold and hard half-truth. he knew Joe refuted and the team had this as a possible backstory for Andy's father, so we already removed the first two, but replaced them with a new one.
The semi-truth, but let's now look at the reverse psychology if he intended to use. Reverse psychology in casual viewers or double reverse psychology in analytical theorists is a question of how far you are willing to go. Remember that there is about a 60% chance that you have had more than enough time to plan this and a 70% chance that you have had more than enough time to plan this. At least some time to plan this and there is still more than a 20% chance that he was using manipulation tactics. His tweet may have been outwardly annoying, but from the beginning I can safely say that he did not intend to spread this message to the minority. the minority are theorists, if I were trying to use manipulation I would be doing it to the majority, the majority are casual movie viewers who may have been convinced by Mike Mozart's solid statements as this is 95% of the case with Regarding the first one that I can safely. eliminate the double reverse psychology of the options, so here we are left with the reverse psychology or the semi lie.
So did he intend to make readers guess his tweet? This is where the only thing we can do is check his wording to see if he is serious or not, if his choice of words is intended seriously in this way, then it is the semi-lie if it is more abrupt in jest than the reverse psychology of him. The first sentence is complete and absolute. Fake news. A rather abrupt wait begins. I'll tag this semi live for now, but. maybe it comes back after the rest of the word and now the next sentence is a little more sarcastic and joking, using a common statement to apply to something where people never left their homes.
This is just a common and overused joke statement, so it's marked with reverse psychology. There's nothing to see here folks, which when combined with the last two statements neutralizes everything, it's a mix of both, which is unfortunate for all of this so far, it just keeps things in the middle, but it's the last thing that hashtag was added. I was there that really ends up pushing things in one direction or another, it's like a final touch of coldness, a very forceful statement that unfortunately does two different things, the fact that you feel the need to change thestatement with this little extra hashtag is indicative of sarcasm, but what it actually reads is indicative of the cold hard semi-lie, so Trump is the other one.
We also have to realize that on both days he was the only one on the team to respond to this, which further demonstrates what it could have been like. a little more coordinated to solve something, I mean, the other Creators didn't just drop four bottles at random times, it was just him and since it was something a little more organized than blunt anger, now we know that there is more than one There is 90% of Chances are all of this points to the semi-lie, so that was it when creating Toy Story. Andrew Stanton and his co-creators probably exchanged ideas about Andy's family and some backstories, but none of them came to fruition or made it into the Pixar canon at Joe's Lunch.
Ranft told Mike Mozart one of the ideas that was accepted as his main Canon and passed it on to the Karlin Bros in the form of a viral video so that no one lies here as some assume that Mike Mozart is not and has absolutely no no reason to lie, but this whole story about Andy's father is pretty clear based on Stanton's statement, something that is not true, at least not on the tin, because it is a half-truth, it was an idea and, finally, the point of all this psychoanalysis or whatever you're doing here is that. counts towards the canonicity of Toy Story and the answer is no, although it is in fact partially correct, it does not apply to the film because despite the avalanche of evidence it was never blatantly explained and in fact was subtly refuted by a cryptic Stanton on Twitter , so My point is here, let's stop with the question of Andis's father because it was clearly never intended to be a part of the story, but we should certainly continue to focus on those other two important questions that remain in the first part, who is he with?
Emma Jean now and why. Does Andy have a postcard from his grandparents taped to his wall? These are things that writer and director Pete Docter publicly stated were important, so let's lean into these and I've already started on this. I said in that first video that the couple in the front row at Carl and Ellie's wedding is probably Emma Jean and her new love interest, so look for an elderly couple in any Pixar movie or short with these shared genetic traits, especially those eye colors, and think of that card on your ratatouille wall. It's one of those Pixar movies that really radiates untold intensity.
Backstories Why does Alfredo Linguine have an American accent in France and Anton ego has a British accent Who is the woman at the beginning of the film How does Remi Linguini control? I had a lot of fun with these questions and, in my opinion, made one of my best videos, but unfortunately it had a robot voice speaking over it, it had certain parts that didn't make sense, and certain parts that were debunked. Oh my goodness, who can't have that! So today I bring you a revised theory in which I take a previous theory. video of mine and improve it hello, I'm the theorist and this is my most exciting movie to cover.
I love it, let's do this right now. I will go over all the evidence that I concluded in the original video and discuss my theory in a better way, but before I start, a couple of months ago, the Carlin super brothers made a video quite similar to mine, but I won't deviate from their conclusion. I will stay within my original limits. Anton ego is a food critic who has a very tragic story. but without touching on the backstory, this is the main point I made in my original video, but after what I found today, I'm retracting that statement to make a new one.
Anton's ego has an extremely tragic past, more so than he previously believed and this new one is more tragic. The solution fits with nothing I can see to discredit it. Anton's ego mother in his flashback scene is the exact same woman from the beginning of the movie boom. Why let me explain in great detail why I have come to the conclusion that this is the case? an umbrella leaning against a wall a reference to which Mabel mistakes for a shotgun by the way, this old woman confirmed that the name is Mabel. Both houses have a chair with absolutely identical patterns, exactly the same frames and very similar styles, but these pieces of evidence are just skimming the surface, the cabinet they both have has doors with identical designs and the frame is completely identical, just look at them, You can see very, very similar stoves, the structure of the chimneys in both houses is exactly the same, it goes up through the curves and up through the bar. along the top bar vertically inwards they are exactly the same which really confirms the chimneys, although they are the curtains that cross the top are the same in both places this is not the type of thing that is a coincidence I want more proof The silhouette Anton's ego is right there on his wall with its pointed head, prominent nose and tiny glasses.
The floor of his house is identical with red and brown hexagonal patterns. The same goes for carpet colors and patterns, wall colors, and door styles. Colors: If you received a million dollars for every time you said identical, you would be a millionaire. Well, I guess it's a stupid comparison, but they're still identical and you could argue that Pixar is simply reusing similar models to save time animating them, but one. We're dealing with Pixar and there are too many similarities for it all to be a coincidence. Also on the wall next to Anton's silhouette is a framed picture of a young Mable and a husband.
Young Mable looks identical to the lady. . ego they live on a farm in rural France with a rock wall along the inner courtyard just like in Mabel's courtyard also outside they have identically placed and colored oak trees that by the way grow in rural France the vines that grow around the entrance are the same in the old lady's house, the warning path outside her front door is the same. The only noticeable difference is that the house seems to be completely reflected in the flashback. What is the symbolism behind it that I didn't know before? my last video, but I'm doing it now and I'll get into that in a minute.
The genetics comparing Mabel to ego are correct. Eye colors. Hair colors. The earlobes. Laterality and everything else is similar. Mabel also has the same genes as Anton's mother. ears eyes hair color and dexterity this makes it more likely that they are the same person the time coincides F also the ego is 50 years old this woman is 80 years old this ego is about ten years old in person back this mother is 10 years old 30 like mother by her generalized characteristics, the perfect time for her to be a mother to him, as if it couldn't be more perfect, so I can conclusively say that Mable is Anton ego's legitimate mother, but how does this surprising revelation change everything the flow?
Well, there's a lot more to the story to cover, including that terribly sad part. I promise. Mabel is obsessed with taste. The books of her. Her kitchen. Everything she has. Mabel's wedding photo portrays her groom as a large man with facial features to match. You guessed it. Taste is also Mabel's husband and this is where things get extremely unbelievable, but unfortunately this was the only part of my theory that was debunked because Linguini's mother is called Renata, not Mabel, and you know Cousteau is his father, so it wouldn't really work there. Renata died unlike Mabel who is alive and functioning so the only solution is that they are not the same person so how does it all work in my original theory?
I made the main claim that they were the same person but they are different. The names go against this and I strongly thought it was so close, so close, but still too far away, fortunately things fell into place when I started writing this script. Here is my conclusion. Gusto and Mabel had a son. Anton, genetics match up perfectly when it comes. The taste and the ego at some point pass and the taste leaves Mabel for Renata, with whom he becomes her boyfriend, but Mabel also loved him. An obsessive point and she continued to obsess over her shows and cookbooks.
She is old and crazy. Accidentally Renata and Cousteau ate linguine, but Renata. I never told Gusto like they say in the movie and that's why the ego hates linguine as much as Gusto because Cousteau left his mother for a newer model but then Gusto created a replacement for what Anton was supposed to He was his father's successor. He feels like his perception of reality has just exploded into billions of subatomic pieces. Anton's hatred of his father makes his critical opinion very biased and he deducts a star from his restaurant. This depressing moment is when Cousteau can't take it anymore on his own. son has broken his heart and Cousteau dies there.
There is no way a chef would die from a bad review, but all this piled up and his son criticizes him badly, that is the cherry on top of a horrible situation. Cousteau dies at the end of ratatouille. The ego says that he finally realizes what he meant when he said taste. That anyone knows how to cook this means that he has known it for a long time. Renata probably didn't like ego for being the son of a previous woman and then she hated him for killing her boyfriend. She never revealed any of this in her letter to Skinner in her eyes. and possibly Mabel's ego was a shame to both women, who unwittingly killed her own father with little or no remorse and why didn't she reveal to Cousteau that she had linguine, that she already had a son?
It would have been too much to take in. we see that he dies easily we have to be careful with those shocking revelations the only one who knew anything about this was ego this is the reason why he despises taste and really hates linguine linguini without even knowing it made Anton jealous ego shows that his last name is he didn't like it because he left them and changed it as we have already established he wanted to be as far away from them as possible he changed his last name to remember his father Cousteau's uncontrollable ego darker and much less cheerful than he seems, but he remains in the business of the food being a highly respected critic, anyone can cook up a slogan intended for ego, but that's just a possibility and finally what I think is the key clue: ego's mother has exactly the same recipe that the restaurant has faretta to be exactly the same.
It's strange how specifically they called this movie ratatouille, why surely not just because they abandoned what they did, but because of the impact it has on this broken family. We're uniting the once-perfect little group, Anton Ego, a food critic driven by his father's betrayal. the madness of his mother the arrogance of his father's new girl and the jealousy of his half-brother a man who only wanted a family but everything fell apart when fame hit them like a freight train taste succumbed to another woman boom the little family falls apart This is literally the opposite of the conclusion of my last video.
Pixar builds a happily divorced family and then a perversely divorced family. It's really sad when you think about it and we know from all the deleted scenes that Gusto wasn't just depressed. In the review, he was a completely depressed and angry man, cheerful at times but unpredictable at others. He has no reason to act this way. He has a great life, or so we are led to believe. These scenes actually took me by surprise at first, but now. No, they support my theory and now we know why Gusto was a sad guy, not a bad guy, just a sad guy.
Finally, that point I made about his memory being reflected back to him, why is he flipped? Well, Anton has led a pessimistic life full of hate. I mean, it's not like you can really blame him, but he's still lived it, however, he's like anti-taste, extremely thin and dark, while Cousteau is extremely fat and gelatinous. Jack Skellington, Santa Claus, you may say, and yes, that's a nod to a Future Theory He may be doing his mirrored memory anyway. Mirrors symbolize countless things, but most notably, they symbolize self-evaluation and reflection when It's about the consequences of your actions.
The ego has a lot to reflect on the murder of his father. His pessimism amplified him. His entire life. Life is something to reflect on, for God's sake, his workplace is shaped like a coffin and looks like a stick figure. Too much guilt, just something to fuel the fire that's worth it. I'm starting to think that's the only non-sad thing that can come out of this. The backstory of the film is the fact that Colette and Linguini's new restaurant is now world famous, you can say it's the same as if Reilly's mother read about it now that we've covered everything there is to cover. , it's time for me to do the is the only timeline because if you're still worried about the timing of all this, don't worry, it looks perfectly Ratatouille is one of those Pixar movies that takes place right when it came out in 2007 This means that when we go all the way to the beginning of our timeline, Gusto and Mabel are born in the year 1927 or at some point around there they get married at an unspecified point.quite some time later, when they are around 20 years old, they have a son named Anton, he is born around the year 1952, all these dates are estimates calculated by the way Ranade is also born sometime between Gusto and Anton's births, after As Anton grows up a little, his father leaves Mabel for Ranade, who becomes his girlfriend, which causes Mable to become forever obsessed with her husband's loss of toll, and naturally, that infuriates Anton, but he What really angers him is when he finds out that his father's girlfriend has a son.
His father doesn't know that Linguini's birth around 1972 gives Anton a definitive reason to have a personal vendetta against that family. and at the restaurant, he mischecks his father's food and accidentally kills him. He always says that he thinks no one knows how to cook and that's just an exaggerated and understandably biased response. Gusteau's death occurs between zero and fifteen years after Linguini's birth, so Cousteau died at the age of 55 to 70 15 to 20 years after his death Renata also dies and Linguini begins working at the restaurant in 2007 everything fits together that's why I love ratatouille if you haven't seen my other ratatouille video yes I have another one In one I talked about how taste two could have been controlled by a rat and now I have this theory to feed that a Cousteau lived on a farm rural initially on the same farm where Remy's father lived.
Is it possible that Remy's father loved to hook up and that I still betrayed him after a tragic breakup, would that be why the father is so vengeful. Li was diagnosed with linguine with autonomic dysreflexia and it is hereditary and Skinner's lawyer said he found a chef's hat with rodent hair on it, so this may be for another day, so later. My last one we read a theory your people have some questions regarding my timeline and of course I made a promise to delve deeper into the mysteries of rats but maybe the rat concept is for another day because today I want to explain an alternative route to my Full Video Hi, I'm the theory expert and this is probably my favorite theory I've ever made, but there was something sketchy about it.
I want to clarify some things. This timeline I presented at the end was not accurate and was not. It wasn't meant to be, it was just to put everything into perspective, it could vary by about 20 years and still work in many ways, people were telling me how Cousteau died just a couple of years before the main movie and how that totally fractured my timeline . but it's not like that, like I said, it's extremely variable, but then I got feedback from some people and they mentioned something very interesting. I had reflected on this point when editing the video, but I didn't really take it anywhere like I already had.
I set the concept of father and son in stone, but when these people said they could be brothers, I felt like going back to the concept and since I'm now doing a part 2, I thought I'd get my thoughts on this back, so just. an ego may well be siblings, it fits into the fractured timeline even better than before, it makes even more sense when it comes to how the mother would favor one over the other and the fighting and competition between siblings is much more believable than the meal of a father and son. fighting to the death and literally every point I made in that original video can also be summed up in this.
Now we haven't seen evidence in the old woman's house to say that Gusto was another son, but we do see the person I mentioned. being Mabel's husband, who seems surprisingly at ease, but not exactly, so I think it's much more likely that it's ego and Gusteau's father, than it is just going deeper and deeper, this comment threat specifically points out that everyone Those who participated had excellent ideas. This person pointed out how Cousteau said the ratatouille recipe was a disaster and how it could have been because he was trying to replicate his mother's original recipe and that's why he was thrilled when Remi succeeded.
This person also identified how the motto anyone can cook could also apply to them as siblings, as the taste for balloons could have made fantastic chefs, but ego didn't fit into this. It also makes sense why. he may call himself ego because of how he viewed his family, it makes sense why he might have resentment and also why Mabel is constantly obsessed with her dead son, something much more likely than a heartbreaking husband, the fact that ego doesn't really knew who. Linguini being in the movie was the only real thing that debunked my old theory, but this here makes a lot of sense, as well as the fact that ego has a British accent, he left them and moved to England, maybe Linguini's American accent is due , of course, to the fact that his mother probably didn't raise him in France, I mean, French is clearly not his first language.
I was initially planning on linking Renata to Emma Jean from my inside out theory, since the wishing you were here statement could imply France, but that would make things too trippy and again there were a lot of you saying that the houses were coincident but not coincidences. Some of the reused models are okay, but the silhouette concept of the old lady watching the show and the literally identical ones. The house, from the vines around the door to the rock wall and everything proves that it's more likely than not, so yeah, sorry this is really short, but I really wanted to finally successfully close this theory as far as it goes. to the concept of rat.
That's for another day as there isn't much evidence to say many things, but I just wanted to share this alternative route to doing the Stowe theory as I think it's much more likely that they are brothers rather than father and son see you soon Lily get up Lily get down no no it's not going to be a big mistake oh my god my cat how stupid when people ask me what videos they should watch if they want to understand my channel I direct them to three separate trilogies of theories that I've made I direct them to my theories about The Incredibles Syndrome, I direct you to the even deeper trilogy of Monsters Inc theories and of course to my channels and bombs, the now ratatouille trilogy of theories, these theories are some of the funniest things I've ever seen.
I have had the great pleasure of creating analyzing writing discovering and deconstructing for those who have not seen it and do not know what I am talking about back on New Year's Day 2016 I published what at this time was considered my most detailed video to date However, in the flashback scene there were some holes, so I waited 11 months before revisiting the theory and coming to a slightly different conclusion that generated far fewer holes. Basically, I concluded that taste was actually the brother of ego. Then I took this theory and found even smaller holes, so I just made a very short sequel in early 2017 to fill them in, but the process of making it altered the entire flow of the entire theory without me even acknowledging that the timeline has completely changed over the decades, so in today's video I'll break it all down and summarize my thoughts. and present a final timeline of events to satisfy myself and those left hanging by a short, little-seen theoretical mini-excuse of a part two.
Hi, I'm the one theorized before the epic timeline. I'll just recap the central point of the second part. Basically, everything I said in the revised part still stands, except for the fact that Anton ego is not Gusteau's son but his brother. The second part was mostly just a review of comments from my viewers who mentioned things I'd already been thinking about for a while. While the timeline of part one was short and incorrect as was the Isle Straited family tree, but recently when I've been watching it all again, I recognize the striking visual similarities between taste and ego, they have a very close age and apart from the fat one that marks. and the skinny ones bullying each other look identical, their genetics, in fact, have completely identical hair colors and consistencies and if I had even a shred of proof of this, I would be asked to mark them as twins, the only difference is their last name. and the accents I confirmed were caused by ego resentment and probably moving to England for a while.
The man in the photo on Mabel's shelf also looks like a mix between them, so after seeing another photo confirming that she married him, I pegged him as her father. fat like taste, same elongated skull as ego, so today let's get to this, so the movie takes place in the year 2007 and if we go back with estimated dates, like the assumption that ego and taste would be around 60 years old, that puts his birth dates at nineteen. forty-seven and assuming that Mabel is around 80 years old, that would put her date of birth at nineteen twenty-seven, so beginning in the year 1927 or sometime in the 1920s, Mabel is born, as is her future husband. , they grow up and in the mid to late 1940s I have Anton ego and Augusto gusto now I'm not sure if it was ego or gusto who changed his name to make him more famous, I mean, both last names are quite outlandish, ego is a reference to one's own personal importance, as I said.
That's how Anton, his family, Andrew Stowe, is just a random anagram of Augusta, his name, regardless of whether this family has one of those two last names and I'm going to choose them as the family of taste for this timeline, simplicity like children, ego and Gusteau's mother, Mabel loves. cooking, she loves it and cooks for her children. She even could be a famous chef. her husband I'm not sure what happens, but considering we never see him in the movie, it's assumed that he dies at some point when ego and taste merge. children or young adults, this is detrimental to the family as a whole and might even be what prompted Eagle to leave home, but her mother feeds her children's ego and taste with delicious foods.
It includes a wonderful ratatouille and they loved it and it is a nostalgic feel-good dish. He displays an aptitude for the culinary arts similar to that of her mother and this causes her ego to feel quite distressed. The only thing she loves is oriental food and she is less talented in the preparation area. All he can do is criticize her, but well, her criticality grows. in a general animosity towards those he perceives as selfish and, as an adult, leaves out of spite to become a professional critic of the art form. I desperately want to succeed in replicating this because of the way the men sound like elaborate fan fiction, but it's not entirely my construction of the characters' psychologies, my logical reasoning, and the evidence we see scattered throughout the film. .
The ego leaves, we know because I remember him from childhood - he was French, but his accent sounds almost English, regardless of the fact that he left and dedicated himself to the art form of criticism. As Busto grew as a world famous chef, ego grew bigger and bigger, ranking him as one of the best critics in the world, many people probably had no idea that Eco was even Busto's brother, he even pitches and anyone can cooking a book that implies that anyone, even the ego can cook. but the ego perceives this as passive aggression and rejects it.
In the interview we see at the beginning of the film, it is only at the end of the film that he joyfully proclaims that he understood what taste meant. From that moment on his life changed, but at that moment he was already there. depressed as hell, in his 30s, Gusto meets a woman named Renata who he falls deeply in love with, but something happens that causes them to separate, most likely she needs to move somewhere for a certain reason and this is sad for Gusto based on Linguini. With a very American accent, we can safely deduce that they broke up because we are not.
I moved to America and ate linguine without Cousteau knowing, who had no idea she was even pregnant at the time, maybe she even left because she knew she was going to eat linguine and she didn't want anything to interfere with her work. she. Linguine ends up being born sometime around the early 1980s. Linguine grows up in America and they move back to France when we are not against the disease because he wants his child to live the life she deserves. with her father and she shapes her life around an ideal, from that moment on she gives him the letter and ends up dying in the stolen urns of her tragic death, probably through the newspaper and then, one fateful day, just a few years before the film takes place. returns from England and completely criticizes Gusteau's dish, leading the obese old taste to die of anguish in what I'm theorizing is more than one way: death by review doesn't really happen, especially not superficially as we're told. shows, but his brother. returning from England only to deeply destroy him and just after learning of the death of histrue love, it really kills him, who still thinks he has no one, doesn't even know linguine and dies.
Mable cuts all ties with her remaining son because of this. Igo's depression is just disgusting, then he becomes spiteful towards everyone who reviews things with hateful cutting words. A few years later, Linguini decides to follow through with her mother's thoughts for a career at her restaurant and we see the events of the movie happen, that's all. The family tree looks like this and yes, it was normal for people in the 1940s and before to have children immediately, as they married at age 20, just like Mabel did with her husband. The dates on these timelines are so incredibly accurate it's not even funny. the dates match within only a variability of about two or five years, which is a million times more accurate than the old timeline I made and it all makes brilliant sense, the movie goes by and Remy realizes that the food known as reddit OE has uniquely written ingredients. and instructions in the cookbook, he knows how to design it just right because he's lived in Mabel's attic for so long while they watched her cook, he knows how Eco would like it because Remi knows who he is and sees that the recipe is wrong .
Gusteau's book because you still haven't managed to replicate his mother's perfect dish, but Remy, if there is one, is a transcendent little rat, in fact, you could even say that he is the reincarnation of Augusta Cousteau and that he was reborn into this world only with The task of saving the family, coincidentally lived in the attic of Gusteau's unfinished business. Remy even sees Gusto as a ghost from his past, but I won't go much further with that Halloween, at least not now. His ego is shocked by the bright nostalgia he feels after eating. the ratatouille and the food forces him to remember the love and impact of his mother and brother and completely snaps him out of his cloudy depression at the end of the movie and I mean, seriously, why remember a meal he ate when hurt your need?
You change the philosophy of your life unless it has a deeper connection. I even thought it was implied that her mother had reached the point of dying, so maybe Mabel ended up dying after her house was destroyed, all those memories disappeared and we know she just died of heartbreak. So in my old video I say that everything was identical to Mabel's house, except the main room which is almost mirrored. I think that's not true. I think it was just the back door. We could see a flashback of egos, that's why the room was reflected. They barely show the rear door, but when they do it looks intensely similar, as you can see.
I love obsessing over things that don't have much impact, it's fun and Pixar puts things like a framed man on Mabel's shelf, there they animate but they have instructions to do it, so they build little stories like this into their movies, they have confirmed that they do this and I'm here to solve them, in fact, maybe I'll do Skinner's past next, this theory is done, it's perfect as it is. another Pixar theories trilogy complete now moving on to 2019 this year it's been a lot of fun making theories based on audience reception on my bottom theories here's a little timeline of my channels progress during the time I spent making the YouTube theories ago stats like this because I'm a nerd, but YouTube has been decreasing my usage channels and moving everything around that makes it harder to get said theories to the same subscribed people.
I confirmed this issue with them but there is nothing they are willing to do. what to do to fix it, so make sure you click the subscribe button below because it ensures that YouTube provides you with the video, although many times it is not enough, so they recommend that you also click on the little Bell icon and choose the All button below the notifications. pop-up this specific trilogy is over, but I hope to make more ratatouille soon because I love this movie, maybe more about Remy's link to taste because I just opened a can of worms to explain all the other cans of worms until then . m in the theorized emergency room, are you ready for the most elaborate and over-the-top analysis I've ever done?
I have a meme-worthy addiction to complexity. I've analyzed every little detail seen in this movie and its 2016 sequel just so I can extrapolate the animated plot holes into one giant horror story hidden between the lines. If you're new here, that's great, but you have to be open to this guy. of things because Finding Nemo basically tells the entire story of the Sherman family's life without the characters even saying a word. I have spent hours and hours triangulating the location of P Sherman's dentist's office from Sydney's view. window I have analyzed everything hidden in the calendars and posters in the corners of his office room and I have delved so deeply into my own theories on top of theories that the resolution becomes one of the most difficult things to explain I have ever built in my life. life, so without further ado here is Philip's story.
Sherman, his brother, and his incredibly crazy niece Darla, who is the crucial portal to the nether side of this movie. Hi, I'm the theorist and I'm aware that people have speculated about the origins of characters like Darla. I mean, people at Pixar are really asking. that's why when they go and put P Sherman's photograph of her in the Institute to Find Dory's Sea Life oh you didn't know that right, even if you did, that doesn't even scratch the surface of this colossal iceberg that I've broken away from . Seeing all the other theories about Darla other than the one the super Carlin brothers made a while ago, which by the way was incredibly deep speculation, but I'm addressing the entire Sherman family, every aspect of them, every available detail, every known source. the backstory of the man P Sherman, the story of his life, his brother, yes, and the inherited dentistry occupation, so let's look at every little detail that is seen in each office, be at peace, Sherman or the Institute, because We could begin to piece together just a fragment of this elusive story, so let's begin.
To get started, get a primer on P Sherman's small dentist rooms. From now on we will call him Philip because that is his name. You can tell by looking at the detailed certificates on the wall of his waiting room or by searching the Internet for a Portuguese. 144p video copy of the official Nemo Finding Guide from 2003. Hold on, I'll save that for later. His name is Philip Sherman. So Philadelphia has its own little aquarium. It has many children's drawings on its walls and many certificates. It has many marine diagrams. art and general marine paraphernalia, as well as some signs encouraging flossing and brushing your teeth when you actually take the time to zoom.
These posters appear to have been produced by an association made up of dentists and piano tuners, an interesting combination of dr. Sherman also has an important and incomprehensible appointment calendar on his wall, which is basically the metaphysical key to everything. He has some brochures from Maui and Emeryville, which is Pixar's headquarters, and finally he has some unintelligible notes posted all over the place, but right next to the fish. has three framed photos, one of his boat which is constantly referred to as the Australian Floss if you look closely, the other photos include the main one we see from Darla Sherman's birthday where she murdered the goldfish, and the other photo ending is of Philip receiving a grand golden prize. dental prize in his slightly younger years, so apart from the small x-rays, trash cans, toilets and other unimportant dentist objects, is there anything else?
Yes, he has a waiting room and these details are absolutely crucial. We'll get to the theory in just a second. his waiting room has his certificates Barbara his receptionist and he has a lot of Easter egg toys on the floor for the children to play like Buzz Lightyear he has many magazines and newspapers some with very important details like the one this child's mother reads which literally has Philips advertising at its beginning, largely from the Finding Dory sequel, we can also see many details and various offices within the Marine Life Institute. Now, Pixar's famous Ultimate Theory timeline is highly controversial.
I'm sure you've heard it. This even among Pixar's own staff is controversial, but no one would question if the first film takes place within the same universe as the second, as if it were a direct sequel, it obviously takes place in the same world, so I'll take evidence within. these two movies and cross them over, but not from any other outside sources, famous little inexplicable Easter eggs like Darla Sherman on the cover of Molly Davis' magazine in Toy Story three. That's, like I said, an Easter egg, the image itself, as you can see. is of Darla entering her uncle Philip Sherman's office where there was no camera available to take this photo, so it is not relevant here.
Darla is a different person in that universe or maybe she is completely irrelevant anyway by finding Dory we can see a lot. of interesting details everywhere, including a calendar that I'll get to in a moment, we see lots of notes, lots of details, and a surprising reveal that Darla knows the people who work here because in the quarantine office we see Darla, not just Give it, but to the same image. from Darla that dr. Schurman had the person who knows the Sherman family in his office, but we still don't have enough evidence for a closer connection.
The Super Carlin brothers at this point came to a very similar conclusion because of this oddly placed photograph, but I don't know. stopping quite a bit still, that's most of the details we see in the Institute, there isn't much of value as we don't actually see the Sherman family in this movie rather surprisingly, however, Philip was supposed to make a cameo in this movie, yeah, amazing, I know. Where the hell would they put it here? Well, that's just the question we need to answer. Unfortunately, his voice actor passed away so they couldn't include him in the film, which also means that Philip had a speaking role and importance, but again we'll connect the dots in a moment because there is one final detail that we can find in the short film released with the Incredibles that can possibly connect things even more now.
I know I said I wouldn't be between movies in the Easter egg, but this isn't really an Easter. egg at all because the short film physically takes place in this Finding Nemo universe, now it looks like Australia, but it's actually not. I think they say it's Western America. Normally I would analyze the plants and animals seen, but the ridiculously analytical depth you have. I'm about to see why I don't have time to analyze this short film anyway, it has been brought to my attention thanks to the short film's audio commentary that the character whose arm grabs the sheep to shear it is none other than dr.
Philip Sherman himself stop, stop, stop, what, oh yeah, and get this, his love of nature, Trump, his love of dentistry by a mile, the amount of evidence for this to find Nemo alone is baffling to The doctor. Sherman is a naturalist, his possible dream and favorite hobby is dealing with nature and the creatures within it. His calendar has the day of diving in the sun, which is the day he captured Nemo with his friend, who I'll get to in a moment. He loves diving and boating with his Australian flosser. His arm is the one used to shave sheep in the American West, which could possibly be more evidence of how he traveled to California, other than the fact that he was supposed to be looking for Dory, plus it's Bay.
Basically a mockery of Steve Irwin, with his Australian nature, his crikey catchphrase, his naturalism and his whole personality, he even goes so far as to order aquarium fish on eBay and mail order. He cares deeply about everyone, his posters and everything in his dentistry. There are rumors of a marine nature and one of them presumably features a koala. He gives her cute fish which she, oddly enough, is obsessed with and he catches fighting fish every time he goes diving, so all of this is incredibly important to what we're dealing with. to solve because in my recent obsession with delving into the mind of Philips I was led to a guide known as the second edition of the official Finding Nemo guide.
It contains tons of information about the movie, as well as two pages about the humans I was desperate to see. For the accuracy of this video, I didn't want to spend a few weeks for a dodgy Amazon order to arrive, but all the fake PDF files online were riddled with malware. I knew I needed a few key details before doing any kind of extravagant thing. Claim as Darla's origin or nationality. I surfed the Internet deeper than ever and found a Pixar fan website that took brief screenshots of each of the pages. I got half of thedetails of the pages I needed, but the other half was still hidden.
I got key details like Philip loved to go diving with his dentist friends and I got to see the certificate up close to him, but I needed more, so I looked up the guide to the depths on YouTube and found a Portuguese version. Turns out it was also the first edition. not the second one, but research tells me that these books have the same information just rearranged and with some extra stickers at the end, the video was low quality and the pages turned fast, but I managed to capture the moment of each page in full view and I took it I put it into Photoshop, where I digitally enhanced it.
I got half of the remaining information from Google Translate. Key details like Philip is a famous Australian dentist. This makes sense since he even knocked out one of the Prime Minister's teeth halfway through Finding Nemo. He also says that 42 Wallaby Way is a family business, implying that the dentist's office is in fact a location at that address and not his house, who knows, although maybe he lives nearby too, but always at nine o'clock , which is apparently late even though receptionist Barbara agrees. and she got excited knowing that he will arrive exactly at 9:00, but saying that he is late says more about him than anything else.
He also says that dentistry in this place dates back to his great-great-grandfather in 1895, well that's like From what I could understand, seriously, if any of you have this guide in English, tell me he says he uses dentistry as a door entry into his true passion for marine life and his office demonstrates it. I already realized this, but then the latest data. became so incredibly blurry that two very helpful Brazilian viewers helped me translate it on Twitter users at twelve jgy and Lucas MA eight three nine one two two five five helped me by seeing the words as a collective whole instead of individually as there was Google Translate.
There was only one paragraph left. I tried to work it more with Photoshop without success, they were able to make out something she said like Darla went to school when she was in second grade and waved fish bags with the fish she loves, reconstructing it. I made it. To realize that she is in second grade at a fictional Sydney school known as waltz matilda primary school, it took me twenty hours, but I managed to identify waltz matilda as a famous Australian song without any school called miss that I could find, so , because? This is all important because in my rush to agree with the Carlin super siblings theory that Darla is American and her parents work at the Marine Life Institute, I forgot to acknowledge that she does her thing through her braces to form Australian accent stuff like fish in my heya and Twinkle Twinkle Little Star I agree with the idea that she is directly linked to the Institute, but I think it's backwards and this is where the mental bloat descends on the brains in abundance.
At this point I have 17 pages of notes at the top, now you have to agree with me. but this is all that Pixar has clearly included in their movie and key details that they have intentionally included in their guide and no one has analyzed this in depth other than the Carlin Bros video which is also said in the book or somewhere another detailed location. that Philip gave her the t-shirt that says a rock and roll girl what's going on with this girl what leads me to say that she is not often with her uncle is that the last time he visited her was on her birthday I was here before when she murdered laughs the annual visits of the goldfish huh, sounds like a vacation.
I was even inclined to say that the second diver with Philip whose identity I was determined to discover was his father until this damn guide implies that he is a dentist friend, so you can ask if the book is canon, well, it has high resolution images of the certificates that you see on the Sherman wall and it is official, so yes, but my theory is only the beginning, it has only established the evidence, I mean all of it, but the evidence, anyway, it even mentions in the book how Darla gets a special discount on braces and in the movie Philip plays with them so he's clearly her main orthodontist, but she still has a bit of a separation from him and doesn't see him too often.
Well, I might delve into that information more over the next week so I have time to edit the video, but before this video gets too long to edit, I can say that I think there are some separation issues with his parents, clearly his last name . implies that it must be her father who is Philip Sherman's brother and while it is implied that he dives with dentist friends, the symmetry and intrigue of this second blue diver photographing Marlin as a tourist implies to me that Darla lives in Sydney with his mother. She has a divorced father who lives in California where he works at the Marine Life Institute and once a year Darla spends everything with that side of the family because Darla's dad did something: she values ​​fish like she rarely gets them from people. those he admires. to see what I mean, this common belief system is inverted when the guide gets involved, Carlin brothers theories, read it all, the implied divorce is inverted, the violent girl, the family living places, all inverted but maintained.
Darla's fascination with fish, including the intrigues of piranhas. me or how she just appeared before dr. Sherman's office without a father present as if they had just left. I don't know about you, but I'm starting to empathize with a serial fish killer. This might take a lot of theorizing and writing, but rest assured, I know what I am. Working on this pile of evidence I've gathered as soon as I can, I'll post the next video where I not only put together more and more pieces of the puzzle, but I also found a foolproof way to literally triangulate the exact pieces.
Location of the dentist's office and the Marine Life Institute on real maps. I found P Sherman 42 Wallaby Way Sydney and not jokingly or half-heartedly like those wrong addresses you see people visiting online.this is real this is a real but still fictional location based on the angle from which the window faces Sydney Harbor next Friday. I'll try as fast as I can, but I've never made such big videos with so much information before, I think. that the piano and dentist company that made those signs for Sherman's office could be part of this, the Carlin siblings all assumed that one of Darla's parents is a rock star based on the oversized shirt Sherman gave her. and I agree to the extent that her father could be a former pianist after the recent divorce opera house famous family business everything is proven the year the film takes place the family tree hidden within it the calendar errors seen in both movies and the internet's assumptions are half proven correct on one of the best things I've ever done sad, I know my life hello everyone, welcome back to the Sherman family analysis of Finding Nemo, this It's getting deeper and deeper last week we started this huge theory by exploring every possible particle of evidence seen in dr.
At Philip Sherman's dentist office and in the many offices of the Marine Life Institute since Finding Dory, we also connected some dots and began to speculate who Darla's parents might be. We analyzed both films in the essential Finding Nemo guide, effectively proving that Phil Sherman is a naturalist and that the Pixar short could take place in the universe of these films when we last left the suspense of how Darla's parents They could be divorced, their father lives in the United States and their mother lives in Sydney. Make sure you've seen it. I will do that. Now you will find it easier by placing a small white box in the upper right corner of the video.
If you click, it will take you to part 1 because things are getting more and more surgical than ever as I piece together Darla's tragic story. family and triangulate the geographic location of P Sherman's dentist office oh god what does my life become hello I'm the theorized ER and welcome if you're new but I'm also sorry for the depth I'm about to delve into this no Una A sensible person might willingly do this for fun, but fortunately this is my job, so before we meticulously string together our list of obscure details, we must first get to the most important but random detail: the physical location of Philips Sherman's dentist office. .
I think this is an abject impossibility, it's fictional, well fortunately for us, Sydney isn't and neither is the very intentional detail that Pixar claims to put into their films. These statements are completely true. His films are some of the most accurate works I have ever seen. Aside from a few little things that I'll mention in a minute, Pixar very accurately portrays the famous Sydney Harbour, they have the Sydney Tower, the Opera House and the huge bridge that the fairies saw entering the terminal so accurately that using The vertical angle from which the window overlooks these three main structures, we can point to the geographic coordinates in which Sherman practices dentistry.
You may have seen the viral images online of a Sydney dentist called P Sherman BuzzFeed, being the equally elaborate people they often are, they actually came out to look back. in 2015 and confirmed that this is a location you can't go to for a fake, presumably now here I was hoping to honestly identify the location through the reflection in the path of the door glass, but despite my clear madness, I'm not the type of person. to waste time, but what BuzzFeed did was they just went and found a random dentist in Sydney. They didn't even give the direct address, but after I pointed out the exact location, they took this photograph of the phone numbers on the window of the building, I realized they claimed this too fraudulently, as they often do, just turn around to the other side of the street will show that there is no water directly there, which was the essential crux of Gil's mission impossible plan to escape.
No, exact viewpoints are needed to find this place. We get to movie 1. I'm now physically lazier than the colossal BuzzFeed corporation, but I've never set foot in Sydney, so Aussies correct me if I'm wrong, but Google Maps is my friend today and thank goodness for their plan unnecessarily made for photography. Every street on the planet holds up. How can I, of all people, complain about something being unnecessarily elaborate? I guess anyway the first thing you'll notice is that the Opera Tower and the bridge form a pretty neat line pattern if you look at them. From very specific angles, this unique alignment and order of the infrastructure along with the ferry directions can only be seen from a general point where it turned out that there were a large number of peninsulas sticking out of the area, only one of them is in range. where it could be reached. any shot remotely like this one though, phillips sherman is on the second floor of a building that overlooks a street towards the ocean, these peninsulas have this feature, but a better one to summarize, sit here, Robertson's point, look at this view and thus we have the general image.
The planned location of the office is almost perfect. The only issue is some areas of the scale, but that's just one of those after the minor details mentioned. There are more and I will explain them after very quickly also identifying the location of the Marine Life Institute. from finding Dory, okay I'll go quick, we have to get into the main evidence, this one is a piece of cake, they just call it the jewel of Morro Bay, which is a real Californian location of Morro Bay, but when Dory hijacks the truck Cleveland transportation they drive. passing by several actual street signs indicating places like Gilman Street, this and several other streets mentioned here are actually places in Berkeley, California that connect.
I even saw a San Pablo avenue that I think I remember from The Incredibles. All of this proves that Pixar can be tricky with their details, they want you to figure things out, they've been open about it, but the problem with something like this is that people don't know what's analyzable or what's intended and what's not. These streets are Easter eggs. Morro Bay isn't in Berkeley, the whole California theme in this movie gives off the San Francisco feel, which makes me want to reconnect Toy Story inside out and up, but like I said, we'll stay here for now, It is easy to point out that it is more to obey.
But I'm detailing all of this because we're about to enter territory where these confusions become problematic. If you remember my videos on Megamind, I ended up opening plot holes until now that the logic became unrealistic. This is a problem for me. and I almost did with this next one because Pixar could be putting out the most elaborate story ever or they could be selectivelylazy because this crucial detail either proves the year Finding Nemo takes place or does something much worse, as you may remember from In the last video, I said that the only video I actually watched while doing my analysis was the Super Carlin Brothers from Theory Channel.
They noticed the calendar on the Philips wall using the fact that it says November and where the dates fall in the week it ends. Since Finding Nemo takes place in 2009 or 1998, there is no other comprehensible time available in this period, this is quite true and according to this extension, Finding Dory would take place between November 1999 and November 2010, although it seems summery in this movie a year later. can mean several things, I guess it's California, the problem is simply the fact that while many things are blurry on this calendar, some key things are visible like the day he went diving for Nemo or the day of the Darla's birthday, which is on a very hilariously creepy Friday the 13th, but this is where I start to wonder if this is intentional.
They were willing to label this calendar with things I can barely read and yet they seem to think November has 31 days and this is where things collapse into a pile of dust Pixar has intentionally put 31 days in November where they just decided label 31 days on a calendar that, for convenience, started in the first square which, of course, is Sunday. This problem occurs again with Sunday. A first time that happens when looking for Dory. I scanned this office room and bam, we don't know the month, but in 1999 Sunday was the first in August and in 2010 so did August in those months have 31 days a year later. summer, but here you see the problem: this clear intention to liven up November is a lie and November is not the month to find out what's going on when Phillip Sherman is terrible at making calendars because it seems like this calendar also doubles as a dry erase board. he can change what it shows now because we never see the month on the calendar and we find Dory and I just couldn't analyze it further by watching the movie, we don't know if it's accurate, but if this group of dentists and pianists from Sherman By making these calendars , as well as the posters, we could have a consistency of error that is intentional, no, in all honesty, the brand stars, errors like this are minor and could be explained by Phillip Sherman being too lazy to even erase the dry erase part of November that I had posted.
Well, the key here is that Finding Nemo began production around 1998, the main possible year for Sunday, November 1st. I mean, things like the clocks on the wall are even accurate to their times and appointment lengths, and things like that, basically as confusing as this is Pixar. is making mistakes or Phillip Sherman himself, but unfortunately for all this something else bombards our precious Tea Party of calendar dates Phillip Sherman's electronic aquarium filter Finding Nemo is a movie that was released in 2003 Aqua Scum 2003 seems almost like If it was intended to be called that to correspond with the planned release in 2003 and you could say that it's just a joke phrase like blab ematic 3000 or something like that or even that it's just an easter egg and not valid information, but then you'll notice that it literally says copyright 2003 inside the booklet of the flip book consciously and it's not like Phillip is going to have a new six year old technology if this movie takes place in 2009, then if it takes place in 2003 it would seem like it's so simple like this Phillips Sherman. is such a bustling dentist that he doesn't mind changing the month on his calendar, in which case 2003 had a Sunday in June, June 1, a summer month appropriate for this kind of weather, but again, it's Sydney in the middle of it all this, although we have one.
Only confirmed stable data point: Darla will turn eight during the film in Australia, as Australians will know that the school year ends around December and resumes at the end of January. If you remember, we have also translated that the guide said she was in second grade. perfect sense perfect sense If she were American, it would mean that we could determine the month range of her birthday, but this is just further confirmation that she is not American. The photo seen for most of the film was from a year ago, marking her seventh birthday. If you look at the background of the images, the photo was taken in the same dentist's office once again.
I will say that she makes this visit to Philip Sherman annually in one fell swoop. Philip Sherman approached a little patient boy and told him that little Davey Reynolds Davy Reynolds is a famous 33-year-old racing driver who would have been exactly this age in 1998, and he is also Australian, however, a screenwriter who worked on This movie is also called Davey Reynolds and Pixar has an obsession with naming streets and characters named after real things. Big problem for me and I hope you can see the impossibility of identifying this last key detail. The best I can figure out is that it takes place sometime between 1998 and 2003 during the film's production, but all of these huge, final details are leading up to an ending.
The purpose is for you to see these details, everything caught other things in my eyes when I saw them in the big picture. Sure, Darla's photo is seen at the Marine Life Institute, but we also get to see the two people who work in that office. I think the Sherman family studies the intelligence of fish. and I think the incredibly incredibly strange hyper meta character in the Sigourney Weaver universe, voiced by none other than the real Sigourney Weaver, is the key to all of this. I would say she is Darla's mother if she hadn't said since she is Australian, we see more. people in the Philips office and I'm going to genetically link them all and you can feel it but unfortunately you're right this will all have to be delayed next week or the week after obviously although for the last time literally theorizing about part three as I write this video and people on my Twitter knew this was going to happen, these three contestants were supposed to collectively last another hour at the end, let's see if I can compress it enough because it needs Sherman's receptionist, Barbara, is a key player in everything This is for humans to find Nemo, they have a massive conspiracy and I am going to solve it.
P Sherman is a play on Sherman's Australian Darla Philip Sherman is a naturalist in a family of dentists five generations of dental work 1895 sea life intelligent pianist parents spy toys Sigourney Weaver world's best dad triple timeline Dad Sherman matching genetics receptionist Barbara 9:00 a.m. m. P Sherman 42 Wallaby Way Sydney triangulation heritage blue divers The Prime Minister's Divorce Puranas this complexity this Porter line Conspiratorial level of animated detail. I wrapped it all up today as I laid out Darla Sherman's family tree on her family timeline. All the massive information hidden between the lines. Hello, I'm the theorized ER and I'm finally finishing up this amazing video series.
This is easily the best. Everything up to this point has been manipulated with little evidence. This is the theory. It's an amazing series of videos. There are only three videos. This is of course the third and final one, but of course if you haven't seen the. The first two thirds of this mega theory I will now link in the white box in the top right corner. I hope you're all ready for the awesomeness because here comes all the many details I've discussed so far can fit together perfectly. a way that I assume is best displayed in a timeline format.
I love some timelines, but before that I'll recap the main details of Darla Sherman and her parents. We know that Darla's uncle, Philip Sherman, must be related to her through a male bond. For the last name, this means that Philip Sherman has a brother who is Darla's father. Now Darla herself is confirmed to be Australian rather than speculatively American, as her recurring photograph of her being seen at the California Sea Life Institute to find Dory, she makes you think. that perhaps one of her parents lives in the United States and one of them, she does not, although although it is implied that she only sees her uncle for a time once a year, this is because her parents clearly They are no longer together, she is clear about it.
She has obsessions and fascinations with things that she associates with people, but this addiction to fish is not only due to Phil Sherman but also to her father, who lives in California and works at the Marine Life Institute. It makes sense that she spends most of her time with her mother, who also lives in Sydney. Darla's aggression is not something uncommon to see in divorced children and almost implies that something really terrible happened to her father and her mother. Darla's main orthodontist is Philip Sherman since she receives a discount on braces, but Phil's relationship with her father. she tires out her mother, her father probably visits her annually.
I wish she would happen with that whole side of the family. Philip has a deep passion for diving and, being a naturalist, even surpasses his love of dentistry in Finding Nemo, which takes place around 2003. long long story dr. Sherman Mann is his boat, the Australian flosser, to go out to find fish, he kidnaps Nemo thinking that she is saving him. There is an additional mystery man diving with him in identical but blue scuba gear in the now infamous essential guide who says that dr. Sherman loves diving with his dental school buddies, but given the moment with Darla and the way this man photographs the descent, I'm inclined to say he's possibly the father of his brother Darla with Dr.
Sherman looks for a fish to immortalize himself in Darla's memory once again, they tried it exactly a year before with laughter, the goldfish. Darla's father desperately wants to maintain ties with her and continually buys her fish as a symbol of her occupation and her passion, her pure excitement. Every time she gets a fish, he symbolizes the family member she is never around. She has found love for piranhas. All this focus on the fish. These two desperate men even go so far as to photograph her in her office with a dead goldfish. They just tried to get it. memory of her visit dr.
Sherman keeps the photo with Dad Sherman, who places it in his quarantine office. The jewel of Morro Bay Phillips. Sherman, mysteriously, is also a famous dentist who works on the teeth of celebrities and people like the Prime Minister of Australia, we literally see him in the movies. Now I'm inclined to agree with the Super Carlin-turns-hostess theory regarding how her shirt could implicate a famous member of a musician's family, but like everything in Finding Nemo, the guide inverts the truth and It's just this, the guide outright says that Philip Sherman gave this shirt to Darla, which makes sense given how big it is for her, he rarely sees it and barely knows her size, but I'm not calling her father a former guitarist or something like that, no, he was a pianist or at least that's the only thing I think.
I thought of linking the otherwise very random detail of the Sherman dental posters that say they were made by Sydney pianists and dentists. Naturalistic posters promoting dental hygiene with a random reference to the piano must mean something, even if it's just a meaningless Easter. An egg thrown in the face of logic, it all ties back to how Darla's mother is so estranged from her father, so what kind of betrayal could instill such feelings of clear hostility that would result in violent childhood adultery? Fame does things to people, but adultery is always a default cliché. in these cases there is minimal evidence that we see several people in Finding Nemo and Finding Dory who could be candidates for cheating, believe it or not in a second, although I'll get to that because it's something much more intense, something that apparently emerges from In Left Field the events of Finding Nemo happen that lead to Philip Sherman being no joke.
He moved to California. I know he possibly even moved in with his wife Barbara, but only if she is his wife. More on that later, he is there to study fish with his brother after learning that fish. in his dental office they were smart enough to attack him and escape holy, where did I get this? Let me explain why I think animals and finding Dory specifically are being studied by her intelligence. The very famous Pixar theory mega timeline goes into this a bit. There are sections dedicated to how AI humans and intelligent animals converge in the future, but make no mistake, this similar conclusion is something I came to for Finding Nemo based solely on the evidence from Finding Nemo because it's so true. and seriously there is nothing else. fresh mind explanation below about to deliver The animals in the Finding Nemo movies are particularly intelligent creatures that can communicate with more than just voices and assimilate far beyond mere instinct;
They are mutated and evolving. The Death of Darla studies the increasing intelligence of marine life. The example is Hank, theoctopus, which can literally camouflage itself, act strangely humanoid and, once again, like all fish, has high intelligence. He is known around the Institute for being smart and outwitting the staff. These animals are intelligent and this fish hospital takes advantage of disabled marine life to study. It's a good example of how strange this movie series really is: how fish talk to each other, not only can they do it underwater, where sound travels terribly, but they can also do it literally from bags away.
Nemo can hear his father's screams from Nigel's peak. as it is in a bag on the counter, it communicates with the tank gang through the same bag and only the tank gang members communicate with each other through the plastic bags after escaping, even Peached, the starfish is a bit intrigued when she talks while stuck to the side of the aquarium glass, should we say they can't hear her when she's stuck and then turns around and says we have a live one before, no joke, turns back to the glass and speak, now you can hear her well, yes, because I just approached her, she turned back the same way.
It is because their form of communication is more sophisticated than simple sound waves that travel through water and the Institute of Marine Life is aware that some animals are developing this, although they cannot assimilate others such as the monkfish at the bottom of the sea. or like brainless jellyfish or like Becky the mentally disabled bird, that's why the Marine Life Institute isn't so surprised when fish do crazy things, it's brilliant and the reason I know P Sherman moved to Morro Bay is because he was supposed to show up to find Dory. Now I'm not sure exactly where this information comes from given the fact that she is littered with multiple wikis and the fact that I remember the photos being confirmed.
P Sherman is the man shearing mountain sheep and it takes place in the western United States, even if it is only his model that remains unique enough to be mentioned and each piece of trivia proves the other, the trivia of her planned finding the voice role of Dory was probably due to an additional comment. Even without taking into account all this cyclical evidence, we know the obvious facts that Darla's photo is there and that there are many Californian brochures on the wall of P Sherman's office. P Sherman, who now lives in California. I'm not even sure, but I think I saw his Ossie Flosser boat.
Being dragged down a highway to find Dory He is a naturalist He works together with his family to demonstrate the intelligence of animals and it was a speaking role He was important enough to be here It was cut because the voice actor died in 2011 however it was Animals are intelligent, this should not surprise anyone, honestly, even fish that rarely see the outside world, like Marlin, know everything about the things that humans do. He knows what balloons are, but not dentists. It's interesting. It even prompts me to think that the person who touched Hank and traumatized him by supposedly ripping off one of his arms was a Sherman, which would be the kind of thing Pixar would do, but there's literally no evidence of that and Occam's Razor rips it apart.
Darla has to love a fish that she is obsessed with over trivialities. about piranhas and this is a lot of speculation, but everything is tied up well. My final speculation before including a family tree here is that Barbara Phillips' receptionist is his wife, knows Darla well, and calls Philip. I love it, she is the right one. age and there's nothing totally crucial here, but we can put her as his wife for now just to fill the gap in the family tree, so here's Darla, the daughter of an MLI occupational naturalist with a penchant for pianos and her mother is a Sydney resident. woman who had a very cruel breakup with her husband, maybe their estrangement was built over time since he lived in California or maybe he cheated on her, I don't know, but the aggression was so great that it caused Darla to become a murderer of animals dad Sherman has a father, grandfather, great-grandfather and great-great-grandfather, all of whom practiced dentistry at 42 Wallaby Way Sydney and his title passed to Philip Darla's uncle.
We can assume that Philip is the older brother for reasons such as the title being passed to him, among other small observational features, Philip as an occupational dentist with a penchant for naturalism who moves his practice to California after the events of finding Nemo. He might be married to a Sydney woman called Barbara Wham, that's the tree before the timeline, although there are three more. little things we need to establish the MLI seabed the owners of the quarantine office and genetics first the Marine Life Institute has some interesting things lurking beneath the surface of the surrounding waters there are a few easter eggs but the highlight is a couple of cars, what could this mean? what kind of person drives cars into the ocean next to an aquarium oh my god Dory's fish escape happened before the fish escaped from here more than once it's the only thing that makes sense that's why This hospital aquarium works as a study center.
They are used to this kind of madness, which is why, in the first place, they are aware of the intelligence of the fish. This is a great detail, but there's not much more I can say about it other than it supports my theory, which is another thing we can say. see at the bottom of the sea in some places it's the best dad ever mug, it could be nothing but in my opinion it's a reference to the idea of ​​a dad working here obviously the chances of that happening are very likely, but given our new knowledge that Pixar has hid this very specific story in their films could it be a fairly direct reference to Darla's father?
I'm not sure, but the seabed is clearly important. Second on the list is the quarantine office, which contains a photograph without stars, this is probably the most revealing. The really intriguing point of these three mini themes because, believe it or not, we see the people who put Dory in this office who captured her now, whether or not they own the office, I can't be sure, but they persist. this duo mails for quite a while while making a joke and then the woman scolds him in the background of this office we can also see an automotive coupe on a map of the oceans an image of a glacier and a similar looking tropical add to the dr .
Sherman had the couple who came into the office at the beginning. I thought she called him Phil, which would have put another quick spin on things, but not only did she not call him Phil, but the people who put Dori in this room are not the ones who heal. her, this is quarantine and a more technical type of chemist would be the one who would work in this place, as seen with the glasses. The woman here clarifies that the man is a scientist, but everyone who works here is technically a scientist, so we need someone with a similar build. for the doctor.
Sherman, who looks like the diver and who works in quarantine, when Hank sneaks around the corner, a man in another office picks up the phone and says hello, how are you, another mysterious person in the building, this is the office in the one we see that annoying. calendar that is engraved with permanent dates you know it's not like the one dr. Sherman could err on the side of dry erase, even though it has the same format. What's interesting, though, is that the month in which the search for Dory takes place can be identified a little better by looking at what part of the calendar is flipped over so far - it's not January, February or anything like that. time after June and it is a month that can have 31 days, so it is another Sunday, the first, this leaves March 2009, May 2005 and March 1998, what am I doing?
Sorry, that's what part 2 was for. Just, again, the dates are confusing. The most important thing here is. The man in the room doesn't look old enough to be Dr. Sherman's brother, he is much younger, is looking for Hank the octopus, like the rest of the MLI point, while he, the author's man or some other scientist, could be Darla's father, there is evidence everywhere That this father has a new partner, the woman in the duo, for example, we see the two men again loading the truck from Cleveland in quarantine. I don't know, but he is one of these workers in this building.
The image shows that it has an absolutely positive effect. You would think that he would have an Australian accent, but we don't hear that all people speak. Accents can be fickle anyway, so moving on to the final topic here, genetics. Darla has incredibly distinct green eyes and red hair. which are extremely recessive genes so it is very likely that one of his parents has these characteristics Philip Sherman does not seem to have these characteristics he has blue eyes and brown hair as seen in previous photos before he started graying we see a bald man in Shermans waiting room of the appropriate age with greenish eyes and because it could be either parent who has those recessive genes, this could in fact be her father who parked his car after quickly dropping off Darla.
Honestly, I don't know what the specific criteria are, but the list of candidates. It's huge and this video is scaring Lee Long so I'll wrap it up. If I were to flatten this entire series of events into a timeline, I would probably make it double-sided, one for the California events and one for The Sydney events begin with the creation of 42 Wallaby Way as a dentist's office in 1895 and Sherman, the first to possess it, passed it to Sherman, the second, then passed it to Sherman, the third, finally, passed it to Sherman. Fourth, it is a famous dentist business that is currently working with celebrities in the Prime Minister's ads all over the Sherman newspaper. the fourth is the father of the two brothers I have been calling Philip and with Darla's dad, Philips' duty is to maintain this tradition. and honestly, he doesn't mind doing dental work.
He goes to college and loves it. He gets a lot of certificates. He joins academies and even wins tons of awards in his youth. He has dedicated his life to dentistry, but his real hobby revolves around nature and everything. This doesn't leave him time to have children of his own, but he could be married to a woman named Barbara, his receptionist. It is very evident that he does not have children given his behavior towards Darla. He is between fifty and sixty years old given his appearance, while his dad's younger brother, Darla. doesn't inherit the dentistry business and pursues a similar passion as her brother, marine life and nature, her additional passion is music or at least when it comes to those little hints on Darla's t-shirt and the possible link to the piano on the poster, I could have had some music businesses based on these tracks and the t-shirt and poster Philip buys, but after a brutal breakup with his wife due to an alienation hoax or something else unpleasant that he leaves, he even had a daughter with this woman whom he was forced to leave.
He takes a toll on Darla's aggression and she develops an obsessive fascination with her father's hobby fish. Part of the guide that I couldn't translate mentions how Darla feels like he needs a fish and if he doesn't seem to like her, she will snap. that's all I could make out from the blurry image. However, her father has studied animals for some time and has learned if they are uniquely evolving properties. He moves to California so he can work at a fish study center. He supports his daughter. In her mind at all times he keeps a photo of her in her laboratory and visits her once a year.
Philip is still Darla's orthodontist, but other than that, dr. Sherman only spends much time with her when her father is around her. Her mother is quite vengeful. You see, on Darla's seventh birthday, she has given him a goldfish named Chuckles, whom he kills by shaking her bag. The Sherman brothers take a photo of her and keep it. Despite its objective, a macaw from nature, two specimens seen in two places such as dr. Sherman says exactly one year later, on his eighth birthday, Finding Nemo takes place with Darla's dad and Dr. Sherman goes out and finds him a fish.
He spends a week with her father before visiting her uncle. Madness ensues. She is traumatized by the events that occur during her visit to her uncle. After all this happens. Philip recognizes the brilliance of her animals. The rest of the time. the fish in his tank escaped through the window after breaking his 2003 device and he had to leave everything to be with his brother he becomes a naturalist fulfilling his lifelong passion we receive confirmation of the disagreement finding Dory zuv in pre-production and in the short film Tied in which he is shown taking care of terrestrial nature.
He does all this because the fish have been behaving badly, getting smarter, and escaping from places like the Institute. Sherman is intrigued and joins the studio a year after the events of Finding Nemo. Dory Happens Dory's kidnapping of the truck is the final straw for this fishing institute and, along with Hank, the octopus iselusive nature. Animal intelligence has leaked into the world, so what happens after finding Dory? Well, now I finally have to go into the territory that doesn't. I don't want to, but I honestly have no other option. Remember how I said Easter eggs don't count.
It's true. Those impossible to take a photo of Darla don't count, but those like you don't. Riley inside out visiting the jewel. from Morro Bay count because Finding Nemo is the fourth hidden series that takes place in Pixar's imaginary universe. For those who don't know, I've been building a major theory since 2016 that proves that not all Pixar movies are connected except Toy. The inside-out-and-up story movies surely owe themselves to a woman named Emma Jean. The very famous Pixar theory has to do with Easter eggs. These are facts that link the films in identical places confirmed by the directors and it is all due to this woman named Emma.
Jean and this Finding Nemo Theory trilogy that I have done is nothing more than a sequel to that video series. You should see them or rather just the first part, which I'll link in the white box above now because it all ties together, we see Riley. there at the Institute visiting I have even wandered through ratatouille fitting into this mini verse also thanks to Renata if you want to know what I mean consult my trilogy of theories about taste that I will not link because I am running out of space and time here The cameo of Darla in Toy Story is physically impossible, but they take place in the same universe.
Riley, who lives in the nearby city of San Francisco, confirms that Cisco absolutely knew that Sigourney Weaver also voices a Wall-e robot. almost like I'm an AI announcer and finding Dory - no, that's it - the definitive timeline for me, but when you do a deep dive like this into the actual evidence - surface level speculation, the famous Pixar theory, Believe it or not, it is invested like everything else and It's amazing, but I refuse to share it all. It would take too many videos, but I won't hide it for long. So many connections, even in this Finding Nemo duology, the diver and Sherman's tank could be spying on the fish's IQ or desires for images. the line you were here could be referencing Australia, all Pixar movies that take place between 1900 and the present; maybe the Incredibles can be united.
I'm not saying this is Pixar's theory which is very different. Renate from ratatouille and Darla's father are connected. orange hair like linguini oh my Emma Jean is Renata linguini and Darla's mother theoretical channels don't you dare steal my stream here I'm doing a ratatouille theory as we speak and until next time I'm the theorized one er subscribe immediately this is far from the top Never on I've been so excited to theorize here in my life, my upload program is completely full and you need to click the bell - to join this madness while it lasts because this just got amazing.
I'm here to look into it more deeply next time, but there's already a foundation that I just laid out ok, at the end of the time Wow, okay, I don't even know where to start with this video um, this is the video I've been building too since my channel started a theory, such complete speculation, such absurd ideas. Comprehensive If my recent theories about Pixar movies have been any example, you'll see that I'm right when I say that brainstorming generates truth, the only video you'd probably need to watch before this would be my first multiverse theory from Pixar, it's only 10 or 15 minutes long.
I'll link it in the box in the top right corner. Now I think I can summarize the rest for a few minutes here. So in 2015 I started speculating about how Remy from the movie ratatouille controls linguine with his hair. Very short and pathetic video, but it started to reach some conclusions. I started 2016 by building a massive timeline of hidden events by piecing together the lives of characters like Anton Ego and Chef Cousteau, uniting them deeply through the old woman at the beginning. of the film later that year I used the unifying factor of a mysterious woman known as Emma Jean to directly demonstrate how at least Toy Story and Inside Out all took place in the same universe and a fractured family tree split across those films.
I remade my reddit on a timeline here in 2017. I started brainstorming both theories and in 2018 I solved everything for reddit 2e and solved the mystery of Andy's father in Toy Story. As you can see, we've been developing this multiverse theory for quite some time and finally, earlier this year, I did my longest theory to date, dissecting Darla and P Sherman's family from Finding Nemo, reversing the famous Pixar theory and managing, in a surprising turn of events, to link it and ratatouille to the image. Theories Now I've made theories about many other Pixar films, but they're either not relevant here or have no proof of existence in this little Pixar universe, but these five, please, the speculative blow you're about to take.
Never in the three-and-a-half-plus years I've been theorizing have I felt so unequivocally excited, so absolutely enthused, and so hyperactively agitated to bring you what you're about to see. I myself didn't even know it was coming until my aha. moment when writing the Finding Nemo trilogy and if you're not open to this kind of brainstorming between the lines of Pixar movies, okay, you can say oh, they're just movies, but if you like this kind of stuff like Pixar The studios themselves hide Easter eggs in their movies and reveal them, so the gift you're about to receive is something I don't even know how to fully explain and now that we're all trapped, I'm so excited to finally be able to do it. this hello, I'm the theorized ER and that little monologue before the introduction was necessarily atrociously long, but I can't delay any longer.
This is what I discovered about these five films and they are directly pentagonal connections, so first of all I call it the Californian. quintet because Toy Story is supposed to take place in California within a place more specifically known as the tri-county area, Inside Out takes place primarily in San Francisco and Upstairs takes place wherever it does, but it's all directly related to these other two films. but by tying in Morro Bay and Renata's American backstory during the Finding Nemo theories from weeks ago, that also brings Finding Nemo and ratatouille into the mix here, making them at least 5 Pixar franchises that they take place in this mini universe within California movies like Wall-e. and The Incredibles have their own timeline, but I've noticed that the focus of this little timeline seems to be intelligent animals that think and talk as well as humans and who knows, maybe the Monsters Inc stores are breaching the space -time and not going back. time as the famous Pixar theory goes, but rather in a completely different branch of the Pixar multiverse, which of course makes sense given the appearance of the boo room and the Easter eggs found anyway.
Finding Nemo has astronomical amounts of evidence claiming that both Finding Dory and The Incredibles Down short film still take place in this mini-verse, but Ratatouille for now is based only on an assumption of the concepts of animal intelligence and Renata moves to the US, but that problem is what I'm solving here, I mean. I can't leave that mind-blowing ending to my Finding Nemo Theory trilogy sitting there forever, so let's get into it now as you see Riley Anderson at the Sea Life Institute finding Dory on a school field trip tomorrow in the Bay. coming from San Francisco.
His location in this universe is pretty clear, obvious, easy, but ratatouille, all we know thanks to my fervent theorizing is that Linguini's mother moved from Paris to the United States after getting pregnant, for the sake of it we came back and died there, but Renata Linguine is not the only mysterious redhead in this pentalogy. Of the films, there are two more that come awfully close to Renata's description for those who don't already know. Emma Jean is a mysterious woman who was Karl Frederickson's previous love interest in the film. This was openly confirmed by the directors now that she was never seen. in the film, but her name was seen as the sender of a letter to Karl and Elly that is on a wall of Andy Davis from Toy Story 3.
Emma was Carl's love interest at one point just before he married her best friend. childhood, Ellie, and although Emma Jean Carl divorced, they all remained very good friends again. This was literally revealed by director Pete Docter in an interview with the Carlin brothers. It's truly mind-blowing, but all of this basically leaves one big question: who is Emma Jean in the movies? anyone who really fits your criteria, I keep remembering Carl and Ellie's wedding because the couple in the front row seems to be the perfect age, the perfect level of emotion, everything perfect, but we need to test the genetics before it can really come to be something of mine. radar so let's finally dig deeper if Emma Jean is Carl and Ellie's best friend then she will surely be at their wedding there is no doubt based on what we know about their relationships what we need to do is eliminate the people who are come here Emma jeans The importance of being a red herring in Toy Story 3 is integral and means that, at the very least, she would be here at the wedding given her enormous friendship with the Fredricksons.
The likelihood of her being close to the front and with the people eccentricity is also high given her elusive but important character in everyone else, so with this knowledge intact we move on to the third and final mystery woman established a few weeks ago in my Finding Nemo theory trilogy, Darla. Darla's mother has red hair and we established that her mother/father was more likely to have red hair given Phillip Sherman's genetics, he and Darla's father show none of her Jeanne. If there is one key thing that stands out in all of this, it is that there is one important thing. consistency that can be seen miraculously Renata and mom Darla have red hair.
It is visually confirmed that Linguini's mother follows this trait given Linguini's surprisingly rare genetic makeup, which is nothing like Gusteau's. Darla is the same and Emma Jean might also have this trait judging by the average hair color of the people at the wedding, so are they all the same person? I jokingly exaggerated this at the end of the NEEMO theories, but while I don't think that's the case, I do think this consistency could mean something else. I think we can pinpoint the years in which all of these franchises take place using one key detail: the fact that the three women are the Linguini sisters' territory for speculation on evidentiary hypotheses, warning that if you are a hyper-realistic person seeking to debunk my theories , it will be seen.
Far away, this is the part where I brainstorm like crazy. Also, I'm saying it here so you don't need to comment that it's ridiculous as a clarification, but you will. I've said it before and I'll say it again with a brainstorm like this. has led to revelations like the entire Finding Nemo trilogy, so get ready for what's to come. This won't be a fact, but I'm about to say a lot of things I can work on, oh boy, because of all this summary and now finding any linking evidence I'm going to have to throw out all my ideas right now and sort them out. over the course of a week Pixar why are you doing this?
Emma remarried and she is a gene, this is the key, we don't really know her. surname wishing she were here in Australia like Darla's mother, whose appearance we only deduced based on what is implied to be Australian now, but it may not always be possible that she moved there after meeting Darla's father when he traveled to the United States to work at the Institute, assuming she did it for a premium time Oh, finally Renata linguine only the last name, but she is the second mystery mother confirmed to have orange hair, a rarity of Pixar films, the only one that exists with certainty is Ellie or at least as a girl without a diet. and surprisingly many have considered Ellie to be Emma Jean's sister before the revelations.
This has been discussed before, but never in the history of existence in this context, if she is related to Emma, ​​that gives evidence for the notion that Emma is too. is a redhead who confirms all this if we could establish a family relationship, but that last question that I posed two and a half years ago I must be answered first who is Emma Jean married to now in this video so far we have taken the much- I needed time to recap everything I had done and then we established the main theory that proves who the three sisters could be if they are sisters, but the proof is there or something related to the multiverse next time I will solve Emma's new love. interest among the rest I simply raised and created a final family tree.
This wasjust putting everything back in order in the loop, presenting all the evidence, all the speculation, all the brainstorming. I'll spend a whole week trying to figure this out, if it exists. Is there any possible way to make it all come back to this guy, Garry Gerry, every time his name is related to Emma Jean, who is related to Andy, who gave him the toy, who fixed the toy, but Emma's last name Now it's Jean, but how does the eye color change in Jerry's identity? How does Riley have a smartphone in the 2004 Nemo universe short film ratatouille?
Linguini's brother's chess piece star is just another old guy at Pixar in this timeline, coordinating too much as you can see. I need time to regroup and organize now that everything is over. on the table hello, I am the theorized ER, let's do this without delays, without confusion, pure organization, you will know everything if you just watch the first half of this analysis. I had to split the theory into two videos because it became too complex. to get it into one, so I'll link part 1 in the box in the top right corner of the screen. Now, get it, so this requires a lot of infographics and belen organization broadcasts.
We have Emma linguini Jean mrs. linguini Sherman and Renata linguini goose stove with a red-haired female linguine triplets spread all over the world map, reaching France, Australia and all over America, encompassing Finding Nemo ratatouille inside out and Toy Story, all contained in one universal tip of the Great Pixar multiverse in this universe. the animals are the focus, their intelligence and their interrelationships with humanity could be linked more, but later, because for now we have a small list of questions that we must solve, which allows us to obviously flatten the logic before making the tree first, We solve the most key of all. key questions via Jerry Jean Mary Emma linguini Gary or Jerry I have no idea how to pronounce it.
I'll just rotate back and forth throughout the video. He is a man from the Pixar short film. Jerry's game. The short film involves him as an old man playing chess. in a park he walks to the other side of the board and pretends to be a sarcastic opponent playing chess against his intelligently meek, bespectacled self, that's it, and he's one of the only major older characters in the Pixar universe, at first it seems Pretty obvious that he could be a potential candidate for any man Emma Jean has remarried, but don't let the short film convince you of the canonicity of anything.
Instead, look no further than Toy Story 2, where we see him once again, he is a toy repairman, a cleaner and a fixer. up woody for the collector behold, among his tools we see a chess piece that refers to the short film. They are exactly the same men, apart from a minor change in the glasses and, unfortunately, the large one that I color. I think Pixar has done this to mislead us. the scent even though everything else is identical including the chest piece, the hair is also slightly different but Pixar decided to change the eye color so what evidence is Trump is the other one?
A slight change in color or a full-fledged chess piece as mentioned, I don't know. maybe they're twins, maybe Gary's game is about him pretending to be his twin who died and he can't take it, okay wait, that's left field and crazy, no I think if anything, it's the cleaner of toys who is more involved in all this, so let's go. just call this guy Gary or Jerry or whatever the updated model is, this guy in Toy Story 2 who has more history, we know he cleans toys clearly plays chess, but he has very distinct genetically characteristic bright blue eyes, like many other characters in my tree, here is the primordial consistency it's almost like Pixar intentionally gave him blue eyes to fit him in here it's really peculiar it's like they were doing it to benefit this Lord, not to discredit him now that we have a basis for our tree of ideas Most of this is based solely on patterns like time locations, genetics, and surnames, and we have to confirm all of that as soon as possible.
First we will do the genetics. You can see first that Linguini has a huge nose like Gary's, but mainly Pixar tends to take hair color and eye color into account when they want to denote genetic consistency, as we have seen, so let's verify that we already know that The individual family trees of the Frederickson, Sherman, and Cousteau families are accurate, but here is the big family tree. I'm proposing since I've had a whole week to think about it. I've realized that the timing doesn't completely favor this idea of ​​linguini triplets, which means that Emogene is more likely to be from a higher generation like Gary Carl and Ellie.
The connection points we've added involve Mrs. Sherman's and Renata's linguini, which means that to prove much of anything, we need to link them to Jerry's final model form so we know that Darla has green eyes and linguini has eyes. brown, since Gusta has blue-green eyes, which means Renate must have brown eyes. Darla has blue-green eyes and her uncle and luckily her father have blue eyes, this means her mother must have a slightly more dominant trait like green or brown. None of this is consistent with Gary's new model having blue eyes, however, it is indicative of the Emma gene having dark eyes. eyes, which is interesting because if you remember the only genetic anomaly from the original family tree was that Jill Anderson has brown eyes, given Riley's blue eyes and blonde hair, we said it must be a fact that she had an earlier ancestor with eyes. blues.
Since her father is also dark-skinned, you could say that she looks more and more like the Emma gene, but the only way for Renata and the lady. Sherman possibly has the eyes she has if Emma has brown eyes and red hair, then if Jerry has blue eyes now and Emma must have dark eyes, then Riley's blue eyes almost certainly come from Carl Fredricksen. It's solved, so the three mystery women are all. They have red hair and brown or green eyes, they probably also have freckles, if Darla Sherman and Alfredo Linguine are any indication, the consistency of blue eyes on the coral side of Emma's family tree is restricted to them and the red hair skewed toward this side.
Emma gene this woman who has been a mystery for years is none other than the Pixar matriarch now genetically it makes sense but we need to overcome another obstacle gentlemen names Emma gene has four daughters in this theoretical model that I am thinking about right now and Since then, everyone They have taken the surnames of their husbands, all except Renata, who we know has the surname linguini. This is inconsistent with Emma, ​​whose last name is presumably Jean after marrying Gary, if Emma Jean's postcard was sent to Carl and Ellie before her remarriage, then her maiden name could be Jean and Jerry's last name. , linguini, finally settling once and for all where and Hanukkah her Granada surname is not commonly a French name, but it is quite European, so where on earth did the red girls grow up?
And we move on to locations in the tri-county area that currently contains the Davis branch? San Francisco contains the Anderson branch. Carl lives in the Zeppelin kidnapped from him. What's left of the taste branches in France and the Shermans stretch from Australia to California, just like Davis and Anderson's Emma and Jerry Wish You Were Here, which means they're presumably on vacation, but this was all during the years 2000 to 2015, their movements are dynamic as always initially, although these four central people probably originated in the middle of the United States, Carl and le stade. While Emma eventually spread her wings and sought out Gary, Carl's children grew up in the Midwest and, for reasons related to Andy's father, Jennifer moved to California.
Jillian and her family stayed in the Midwest, but eventually the guests also ended up in California, San Francisco, Emma and Jerry seemed to be quite spread out, quite spread out, in fact, their two daughters were probably born in America, but clearly they were all just they travel. Apparently there are a lot of adventures and Emma Jean seems to agree with Frederickson's sentiment that we constantly wish her extended family were there with her. his travels with Gary Linguini Granada travels all over the map and lands in France for a while, while the other focuses on Australia and marries into a family famous in many sectors, so yes, the locations are now sensible, we finally have to get involved. biggest blocking moment oh dear do I need to overlap all my timelines or should I just start over so the top tier here is early Silent Generation's Gary Linguini, Emma Jean Elizabeth and Carl Fredricksen among others of importance linked to Leslie, such as doctors Sherman, Mable? taste, etc.
The baby boomers and generation I mean, Emma could always be very old, but chances are she had Carl's kids first, the kids, on the other hand, are all Millennials and Gen Z linguine is pretty old, so we've done it , we have finally done it, we have resolved all the logical blockages. and even if this actually makes sense, all but one huge problem, we can't delve into further proof until we fix the glaring mistake that Riley has modern technology because Finding Nemo takes place between 1995 and 2003, as I've theorized. and teenage Riley is seen looking for Dory, so how the hell can Riley have such advanced computer technology and her dad has a modern cell phone?
The photo of older Ellie can be seen in Riley's house when she is a little girl, which means her ears still match, so what do we need? what you have to do is compare the years in which they took place and the ages of the children specific specifications a sample of each branch Andy was born in 1987 Riley was born in 2003 Darla was born in 1995 linguini was born around 1980 ish we see Riley at the Institute of marine life during Finding Dory, which takes place in 2004, Riley is not a year old, so clearly she was not born in 2003, this is not an inconsistency of me, this is a Pixar inconsistency, you know, unless this world has technology that moves faster than average. world, I mean, just look at BNL, AI's technologically advanced super corporation Pixar painted themselves into a corner with this, but explained it through advanced technology and left no real date in the movie.
Basically this all takes place in the 2000s, a time when laptops seem like this was still a common thing, it's more of a time range, but the BNL and laptop designs are consistent, the others three movies are also consistent, like how Jill reads about Caleta and the magazine after Queeny opened her new restaurant, but if that's the case then we're not chewy, it has to take place in the early 2000s too, but beyond that minor point of intrigue, things are sensible, but any further pattern proves it, let's look at the wedding. First of all, I don't think Gary would have been here even when he was young, but Emma Gist has so many options, she has red hair, but it could have been slightly dark like Elly's or, you know, as amazing and amazing as is the only real person who fits the description of emojis by personality by genetics perfect is Ellie the eye color the hair color especially because it gets darker and only the children of this tree have very orange hair the age similarities there are many candidates at the wedding, but Ellie of all people is the one I would accuse of looking and acting most similar to our tentative description of Emma Jean, which means Oh Oh Carl Carl Carl Carl met Emma through Ellie why could they be related?
Could they be sisters of the maiden? From now on Elizabeth's name is unknown, but Jean could work. Oh, let's go watch the wedding again. I'm pretty sure we see Ellie's parents in the front row at their wedding, but Carl's side is a little different. I'm not so sure his mother is. was alive at the time of their marriage, but few fit perfectly into Emma's family Ellie, although genetics would be on point, it would make sense that Emma was not a random mysterious matriarch, but a divorced sister, her marriage to Carl was pretty young, like 18 or 19 depending on the timeline, and they had Jen and Jill pretty young, which would explain why they just weren't ready to take it all on.
They were raised together with two other adults when they separated and remarried two old loves. When Carl is really ready, he remarries at 25 and they try four kids in their 30s, Emma, ​​on the other hand, shows updirectly like Renata and I guess we can call the other woman Missy, short for lady. Sherman, so Jen and Jill were born in the '50s and, given Andy's graduation, Toy Story 3 does not take place in 2010 during its release, but rather like the 2003 to 2005 surprise that also occurs in Finding Nemo, which which means Toy Story 3 finds Dory and inside out. they all take place within a time window that does not coincide with their release date.
Pixar seems to ignore the technological years in the case of Inside Out in Toy Story, only further supporting a technically superior universe because of BNL. Wow Ranade and Missy were born in the late 50's or early 60's and Renata ate linguine quite early by mistake, so all four girls could be seen at this wedding. Yes, Jill and Jen Fredrickson could easily be anywhere in this crowd. Lord knows there are plenty of kids who fit the genetic description of him, the perfectionist Lee, but it would seem like we're not done with Pixar yet and force me to make multiple video theories why there are so many.
These are not the type of questions any normal person would attempt to solve nor are they even remotely easy. I'm the god of navigating plot holes, holy cow, this is ridiculous, so in the first part we recapped and established everything I did before proposing the evidence and ideas necessary to theorize, in the second part we theorized , we've worked everything out like crazy, but other than the very clean tree, the timeline is disorganized, and there are three final questions, what better reason could Andy have kept this letter? What does it have to do with Jerry's connection to being a toy cleaner?, to his grandson having the Woody doll, and finally, what happens next?
Where are you now? Who is dead? What does this timeline look like? Please stay tuned. I had never delved so deeply into Italy before. Click the subscribe button below. Like and comment on your theories. It will motivate me to finish this faster. There are so many things I couldn't. I will do everything in a short period of time, but in a week I will finish everything once and for all. Final picture universe theory because for me no other Pixar movie belongs here in this universe, but we will finally be able to move on to the other universes and Pixar will finally answer once and for all the real question to the most credible solution to a connection between movies a multiverse theory a multiple timeline true Pixar theory designed to intertwine with any possible future Pixar movies perfectly logically optimal and incredibly difficult click the bell if I want to be notified when we finally conclude these 12 long theoretical escapades because until next week I'm the theorized er, so here we have the final theory joining from the inside out Finding Nemo Toy Story and ratatouille, this has been a long It's about time, but I assume you've seen the last two videos, yes not a link, the first and second third of this three-part mega-theory so you can see it now by simply clicking on the white rectangles in the top right corner.
It's supposed to be one big 50-minute theory, but I had to split it into three videos over a couple of weeks. They're not long, but it took me a long time to figure this out and this is the end of it, summarizing everything. answering three final questions and proposing a timeline with precise dates based on this family tree. Hello, I have achieved it. Oh, have I ever made it easy? No, not at all, fun, sure, logical analysis and theoretical deduction are like the icing on the cake. That's my channel, it's a five-dimensional timeline, a pentagonal star of connections, each franchise connecting to each other with little interlocking timelines and data points.
This video should be well organized, so first here are two short main questions that I think can discuss possible answers. Is there any significance to Grandpa Jerry being the toy cleaner he fixed for Woody and why Andy has his grandmother's postcard on his wall? Well, I guess Jerry being a toy cleaner isn't a mistake, especially since he was brought in specifically to clean the very rare ones. Woody doll, maybe the Woody doll means a lot to Andy because Gary was the one in the toy business and he already had previous connections with this very specific doll, perhaps helping with the TV show, he knew exactly how to clean it and it's a very professional. genetically specific character.
I think this is a reference and link to the notion that the grandparents' remarriages resulted in Andy receiving the doll as a gift of some kind, as for the secondary question, I tried to answer it in my first theory about Emma . in which I gather that Andy having the postcard represented how he loves all of his grandparents Emma Karl and the dairy alien steps he loves how they all interconnect and love each other how it could show a positive future for his supposedly divorced parents if divorced because in 2018 I made a video where I solved his dad more deeply if you remember youtubers the super brothers Carlin interviewed a friend of one of the creators of Toy Story who passed away and the friend claimed that the Creator had implemented an entire story about Andy's dad in framed photos. and dying and all that stuff that Andrew Stanton, another creator, later sarcastically dissed on Twitter.
I spent over 10 minutes analyzing his one tweet and came to the crazy conclusion that this whole story was simply a main cannon of the deceased writer and therefore his canonicity was too fickle to theorize about how to effectively void him from future theories yet. This in mind the postcard seen in some additional content I'm not even sure he ate Toy Story 3 is probably something personal for Andy, something along the lines of his entire life. It's based on one grandparent's toys, another's exploration, another's love, and a host of interconnections, so Andy is intrigued by the theories; he might finally make this timeline, but I warn you, the complexity is astonishing, it's horrible.
I'm literally merging my Finding Nemo timeline with my Ratatouille timeline and trying to deposit integral events in there to test everything as officially as possible along with the other three timelines I tried to create with Up Inside Out and Toy Story, so here it is, I have everything. the spaces between events right here from the second part and I know very well how long each space lasts are consistent are the dates, that's worm in the second part I only threw random numbers and revelations, but now I have had time to connect or perfectly previously I have only given ranges of years, but in the name of specificity I'm trying harder here.
The most painstakingly precise date you will remember is to find the time period of Nemo 2003 to connect these three timelines that we need to know how it fits. The rest of the top and inside out years are not supposed to be available unless they are super hidden or from an external source. The toy stories of the years are irrelevant here and Finding Nemo is our base, so I discovered that the damn thing you see from the inside out changes through this timeline and is classified. of drags ratatouille and Finding Nemo with him wherever he goes because BNL's technology makes their dates extremely fickle according to Aqua 2003 scum The date of Finding Nemo is 2000 or that is Riley, who is about a year older here in Morro Bay, proof that inside also takes place in 2003, in Riley's little boy flashback, the magazine is seen with Collett.
This flashback is estimated to take place in 1994, which means Riley was born in 1991. If this magazine is a year after Linguini and Colette set up their new restaurant, then Ratatouille is set in the early '90s, so I worked with this and again, technology is too fickle to use as evidence. Cell phones and computers are advanced in repairing our multiverse due to the company known as B and L, such as movies like The Incredibles. which takes place in the 50s or 60s, they have had incredibly advanced technology so that Pixar has gone into a hole of plot holes and created an artificial intelligence company to respond to futurism, but before doing a final summary of the enormous timeline, there is one irrefutable problem I had.
I just used Finding Nemo status to test all the movies. Years I flew under the assumption that Jen and Jill had their kids around the same time and therefore it turned out to be backwards in Toy Story. Years, all good. I spent hours on it, but then I clarified. Twitter with fans asking you to debunk this idea of ​​a ratatouille scenario from 1994. Adhara, Shalit told me to check the dates. Seamus Corman brought up the topic of technology and many others told me to scan film in general. I had planned to observe Renata's letter to Skinner. closer and finally I did it much to my regret because together with the letter in Bustos' will it confirmed my greatest fear.
I think the will says it was written in 2001, but it doesn't just confirm everything, all it means is that Colette is in This magazine isn't because she and Linguini opened a store, it's probably something else because she's a famous chef or a competition where the orcas were still related to things, but it just happened when she was much younger before the movie's release date in the mid-2000s. but then as I was writing this, I didn't have an ultimatum at one point like Remy from the movie. I was watching Remy read the letters and I saw that Gusteau's will offers his restaurant to any living relative within two years of his death, I mean if this says 2001, then Ratatouille also takes place in 2003, what the heck is Is this making this horribly strange?
Pixar now has three movies set in 2003, something of a mystery, how I stumbled upon what they're doing willingly pointing out 2003 in a non-complicated way, I'm not. Sure, but this long video needs to be compressed, so we change the timeline, back to business, baby, here we go, a final review of five movies, three color-coded intersecting timelines for my video series, I more logical, definitely, explainable in all directions, to discredit it. I'll just make nice bonus videos circumventing sin debunked. Come on, so it begins in the year 1895 with the establishment of a dental practice in Sydney, Australia, a man named Mr.
Sherman manages it and eventually passes it on to his son Sherman Jr. In the years following Sherman Jr. The business passes to his son Sherman, the third, meanwhile, four children are born in the United States, all in the central United States. we have the adventurous quartet of Carl Fredricksen Emma Jean Elizabeth Jean and Jerry Linguini. This raises the likelihood that Ellie and Emma could be sisters. With everything similar, including names, it is mentioned if Carl and Jerry are siblings, but no, eh, they were all born around 1930. They grow up seeking adventure and get to know each other over the years, while Carl and Ellie bond significantly. , they have best friends as all this happens. 1943 goes around and around France, we have a big, jolly man known as Mr.
Gusto who marries a woman called Mabel, they have two children together known as Anton Gusto and Augusta Gusto. Mabel loves to cook and her husband loves to eat in Australia, it is now 1947 and Sherman, the third son, is preparing to accept the business as his own, he and his wife now have two sons, Phillip and an unnamed man who has an interest in music as they age in Australia and the boys gladly age in France. Both groups of children are raised in extremely cultured homes, with the French studying the arts of criticism and culinary skills. and Australians who delight in nature and marine life, as well as music and their heritage of dentistry, educated brothers around the world grow older, while Carl Fredricksen begins to fall in love with one of his friends, but does not not with her best friend, but with her sister, they end up falling in love.
They married very young, they were 20 years old or younger, they have two daughters, Gillian and Jennifer, the year is 1950 and these young parents are not ready, they need instant help with these children, they do not receive even five years as quality. The parents first need to fix this system, so they consult Elisabeth Frederickson and Jerry Linguini who is best to raise these children and Carl and Emma's best friend, so this group of friends comes up with a plan in which Carl and Emma divorce but remarry to unite the entire group. legally so that the parents of these adventurers can maintain such a life.
Emma and Gerry quickly remarry and perhaps on their honeymoon or another day trip immediately after the wedding Emma still has a gene and sends them a postcard wishing Carl and Ellie could come but they can't, they have a wedding to prepare for people who are not prepared here. Karl's wedding side is quiet and depressed, he hints that hismother may have died recently. as Ellie's side claps and screams at the possibility of Emma and Jerry being there if they aren't on vacation yet this holiday, the couple instantly decide to have children and end up giving birth to two more daughters around 1955, when all this happens.
I was born with Ellie and Emma's signature red hair and green eyes. They call one Renata linguini and the other, well, we don't know linguini without a name. This is the most mysterious and distant part of the entire preme. I nicknamed her Missy short due to the fact that we know she is a future wife and it makes more sense than calling her by another name that she won't have until confusing adulthood, so it's still 1955, but Carl and Ellie can't conceive children, so they continue raising the four daughters they now have. his two best friends, while Emma and Jerry travel and explore as they please in France, the chef's two children have grown up in an extremely culinary environment and Augusta shows bright signs of becoming one of the best cooks in France.
Anton loves food like he loves fat. father, but if he doesn't like him, he won't swallow it, most likely he will be traumatized after his obese father dies suddenly around 1963, leaving the family instantly fractured and estranged. Anton delves fully into culinary criticism at which he is ruthlessly excellent and Augusta passionately takes charge of France's restaurant division as her mother had always wanted, this leaves Anton jealous of her lack of cooking skills and he adopts the Anton ego's stage name to represent the way he views everyone he has ever loved. He travels to England for his job and leaves. behind the world she now despises so much, which breaks her mother's heart and sends Mabel into a dizzying madness that only grows in the following years while all this happens, the Australian brothers are having a much better time with their arts, let's call it to the anonymous brother MIDI as We know that he is a gentleman and that in the end he will fit in with his wife, we will see, so MIDI has a hobby for music and panismo, while the older brother, Philip, is granted a job.
He willingly loves the old family dentistry business he goes to. He loves school to become a dentist, but he still wants a life of marine biology and naturalism. Mitty found a job. In fact, in 1972 he traveled to the California Marine Life Institute to study the growing trend of fish intelligence. Now is the time for the most ambitious. crossover in the story things are going well, it's 1978 and Granada travels to France with her parents, where she immediately falls in love with the promising Auguste Augusto. He now has a small team in a restaurant he is opening and Renata stays with him while Emma and Gerry. traveled back to the United States Anton ego has become a prominent food critic in England and Renata probably despises him for his actions towards the family he has now joined and the reason Missy was not here on this vacation is because she stayed at the new Linguini restaurant.
In California, where he met the new Australian boy MIDI, they fall in love in the same way as Renata and Gusto. These lusty redheads have the passion of her parents and dive headlong into relationships with the worldly brothers in 1983. Renata has a French son. alfredo linguine but she refuses to reveal what pleasure her father is if he doesn't tell anyone, she doesn't even tell Stowe himself, she refuses to interrupt her important culinary work or introduced linguine to that lifestyle at this time that sew very stressed, you see. Linguini has Garry's nose and all of Emma's jeans, so it's not a stretch to say he's not Gusteau's, and she returns to America giving him her American accent.
He is raised by an adventure family that Carl and Ellie are more than happy to help with, as his frequent accidents prevent them from going on vacation, so there isn't much fun to be had anywhere else. Oh boy, we're done with the first half of the timeline. Now let's get into the things that are actually seen in the movies as all of this has been happening. Throughout the 50s, 60s and 70s, Emma and Carl's two original daughters became women quite independent from the rest of their family. For the most part, Jillian Fredrickson stays in the middle of America, but Jennifer finds a man in California and moves there. birth Andy Davis in 1987 a boy is wonderful and creative like his many grandparents one of whom gives Andy adult toys from his world Jillian meets a man named William Anderson and they have a daughter named while in 1991 Bill here probably works for BNL a massive futuristic conglomerate of subcompanies that has been accelerating the world's technology for years, the family sends recurring photographs to all members, such as Elly's now older appearance at young Riley's house when 1995 arrives, Andy has his birthday, and finally we see a movie happens that is Toy Story 1 Missy and Mitty moved back to Australia and the problematic girl Darla Sherman is born amplified by the almost instant divorce those two go through four reasons related to general evil minnie returns to california but philip maintains a Keep an eye on Darla for her brother, who joins her once a year because Missy stays in Australia and Darla essentially swaps living places with her husband.
Things are looking up, but then the year 2001 hits the fan when Renata falls ill, she returns to France with a now adult Alfredo Linguine, he devises a plan to give her son a future. You see, Anton ego has returned from England and has been successfully hitting plate after plate and book after book, all created by the brother he despises, which has finally taken away one of Gusteau's precious ones. The Cousteau stars fall into a depression because of his brother and Renata prepares a letter in case something goes wrong, unfortunately something definitely goes wrong and she dies of an illness right on the night that her ego personally returns to Gusteau's restaurant to ruin his brother's career once and for all.
Cousteau. is crushed by his brother and then the news of Renata hits him like a freight train and presumably as his obese father Cousteau dies of hyper stress induced by the lack of love from the two people he loved most in the world Mabel Gusto immediately loses her mind and Descending into madness as he watches reruns after reruns of his son buying all of his books, desperately trying to retain his memory, Anton's ego has descended even deeper into his tragedy, now seemingly irreparably damaged by the depression it caused. Damn, it sucks, maternal estrangement looks like the movie. ratatouille begins in the year 2003 three films occur simultaneously Finding Nemo backwards and ratatouille the accumulations of these enormous problems explode but linguini learns to enjoy and saves his uncle ego from the void of depression while Riley and his parents move to California for Bill's job there Jennifer has probably divorced her husband, but she has a new baby with similar genetics to Riley named Molly.
The buildup of the Sherman family peaks in 2003. This is when Darla is completely traumatized on her eighth birthday when her uncle's fish launches an attack on her uncle Philip. Now fully convinced of this increase in marine intelligence, he moves his practice to California to be with his brother, where he shears sheep and possesses animal life, as seen on his arm in the short film. Missy and Darla stay in Australia, but with nothing for themselves. There they probably returned to the United States returning with Emma and during Toy Story 3 which takes place along with the search for Dory in 2004, but during the next five years, Le Fredrickson becomes seriously ill and passes away, leaving Carl completely dead inside and frames his grandmother and her memories.
Her wall of things like postcards and the joys of her wonderfully complex family takes place in 2009 and Karla has a nice new son figure at the end after having had more adventures than Emma could ever have in her life, but eventually she question is what? happens next well, it is implied that Emma has also died leaving behind areas an elderly denier desperate for love playing chess with a sarcastic girl in jeans is no longer around a tragedy from a short film a truly desperate depression this also takes its toll on him to Carl, but he's lived his life and is ready to move on anyway, so he lives out what's left of his new and amazing adventures.
The other movies have a somewhat happy ending, and I, well, move on, to the next universe. We've worked out most of this. Now let's move forward through the multiverse exchange known as Monsters Inc and find a new universe to dive into, maybe one where AI has taken over like the wall of your cars or maybe wherever The Incredibles are. I don't know but this is far from over because Pixar is constantly updating their Canon I will make a playlist filled with every part of this huge three year old photo our connection theory if you want to see it again I will link it above now stay tuned subscribe for sure and next time I might look at more details in these same movies, we are done with the human connections of this universe, but the animals, Remmy, remember that I am not done with him and the ghost of Gusteau, there are more monsters inc.
It's a future timeline convergence that can go back in time as a multiversal exchange and I'll use this bell ring, I'll take my notifications until next time, which will be very, very soon. I'm definitely the theorized ER. Hi, I'm the theorized ER. I spent a full three and a half years making videos. Something very complicated a while ago, a lot of people were discussing this cool idea that all the Pixar movies are connected in one world along a gigantic timeline. It's very epic, but I chose to do something based solely on minor details that we see in movies.
I got a more multiversal response as always. I decided to fix all of Pixar's plot holes by filling in the gaps with information found in their other films. They have confirmed that they don't actually put that much attention into their characters' stories, so I spent three years demonstrating with a high degree of logical skill the perfectly filled backstories using exclusively other information which they have revealed was perfect because it was essentially a theory. from fan fiction that was completely true because I just filled in the holes with their own facts now this only applies to Toy Story Inside Out Finding Nemo ratatouille and later versions.
I have a twelve-part video series, all part of a cohesive playlist that I'll link to above in the cart. Now this is the final video. I promised I would do a short epilogue if there was more evidence. came up in Toy Story Four or if people commented on something of importance, more logical inconsistencies will be fixed that need to be filled out. I'm making this last video and then I'll make a huge two hour long compilation video later this year for easy viewing. feature length film that plays all the theories one after the other, so let's end with this one, this is the last video I will make about this five movie connection, this antagonist before moving on to his other movies, the main reason why I am making this epic . because to my complete surprise, Toy Story 4 revealed Emma Jean in person as a guest star.
It is not a joke. Emma Jean. I solved the story of her life. Everything there is to know about her was resolved, but we never found out what she was like until I watched. Pixar is the latest addition to the California quintet Toy Story 4 in this we finally see Emma Jean quickly recapping Emma Jean is a mysterious woman who sent a postcard a postcard seen on Andy Davis's wall in deleted images from Toy Story 3 where she sent the postcard to Carl and Ellie Frederickson from above, I deduced in 2016 with a lot of internal evidence and the directors' own spontaneous statements that Emma Jean is Carl's ex-wife with whom in that short period of time they gave birth to Carl's mother.
Andy from Toy Story and Riley's mom from inside. Emma moved on and married Gary from the short film Gary Jerry's Game whatever and had Renata Linguini and Mrs. Sherman Renata is, of course, the late mother of Linguini from ratatouille and Mrs. Sherman is the mother of Darla from Finding Nemo. Hours of evidence, once again, you can see the videos, genetic locations, timing, all consistent with a massive conspiracy in the family tree timeline, all to prove that Emma Jean is the matriarch of Pixar, the center of the tree, last time I theorized. She stated that she is probably a red-haired, green-eyed traveler, a weathered old woman with a lot of worldly experience who is probably hanging around California with her husband Gary, unless she is dead, which would explain Gary's apparent loneliness. in the short film.
Well, I'm here to say no. dead at least not in this time because Emma Jean is the owner of the antique store from Toy Story 4. I thought that the moment I saw her and I'm sure many of you did too after watching my video about her genetics and then seeing his orange hair. granddaughter becausethis woman is the only unexplored old woman of importance in all of these Pixar movies, so yes, this woman is from California, one of our established key locations which fits the bill, her age is about the age I claimed the grandmother was from Andy.
She is supposed to check her granddaughter's unique genetic combination, perfect with the lady. Sherman and Renata linguini bingo, but wait, who is her granddaughter? She's clearly not Darla and she's clearly not linguine, so who is she? Did Emma have another child? It's the only explanation that would seem to be like that again. All this. It's only a plot that fulfills half of the logic, but before we dig a little deeper and finally take into account the latest Toy Story movie, I need to address something discussed in part 12, something that actually saves most of the problems of Now onwards, as you know, there are some errors. with the dates well no, actually there are no errors, they're just more or less not as fixed as I expected them to be mostly just ranges, they're not truly definitive years as much as I expected them to be exact, it's just not the case in terms of how to resolve this, but the new evidence is so definitive that Trump has some of the ambiguity. has something to do with locations, remember how I said that Emma Jean was traveling all over the world, Australia and France mainly, we will understand this as commented by Eric Casper, a YouTube channel known as let's think searched and discovered that the zip code in the Emma's postcard was sent from get this bertants, so for any of you who thought I was pulling out of Qing's European travels, there's nowhere, this is essentially logical confirmation.
I got so far explaining things by going out of my way and extending this glorified fanfiction into a family tree that I don't even begin to see it in the movies traveling to various countries this is a small but brilliant piece of evidence is what grabs both ends of this conspiracy and moves it connecting the beginning with the end a closed circuit that ends where we started with the postcard proving that everything still makes sense, even if the furthest I've gotten so far is the harmony between grandma's blue eyes, so, If anything, this is somehow a third girl on Karl's side, there's little other evidence to suggest this is about all of us.
I have a prominent elderly Californian woman and proof of her red hair and light eyed genetics. Fortunately, the code on Emma Jane's postcard is just that Emma Jean was traveling to France. It makes a lot of sense. It makes a lot of sense. She has an antique gift shop. She lives relatively close to Andy in a carnival fairground not unlike Carl's occupation of blowing up balloons at the circus. She is a kind, worldly old lady who fits in perfectly. It makes sense. Even Gaby the doll seems like some kind of custom-made incarnation. of a younger Emma if there is any woman in any film it will be Emma Jean, it will be this one, so everything has been resolved as best and as briefly as possible.
If you have more evidence from the antique store, be sure to comment. I will be posting a list of Additional Evidence that you can find particularly in Toy Story 4 because the bow of this series of mine must be tied. This is the last Pixar Theory video you'll see in terms of this specific family again. I'll post it later this year. a huge compilation of the Californian trilogy, the ratatouille trilogy, the founding trilogy of Nemo and this final tetralogy mixed into one huge ecology of credits, just like I did with the Coraline series, stay tuned, be sure to definitely subscribe, there are still a lot of theories to come this year.
I seem to prefer it when I watch individual characters from the Nickelodeon show, so I'll do a bit more of that, as well as some updates on the popular TV show predictions I have when it comes to movies. Ice Age fooled me and I have even more in mind, so we'll see what I can handle with that. Make sure to like and comment again on your evidence that this woman is Emma because this is more and more the final conclusion, the only part that confuses me is the granddaughter because we don't see her anywhere else, this 13 part masterpiece in Pixar's logical fix took everything I had from me and this is the end before I finish this compilation, as it turns out I made the same mistake at the end that I made in the From the first opening video of all this, in the credits The woman who owns the antique store is confirmed to have a name other than Emma Jean.
I'll continue working on this in the coming months and may or may not comment on a fixed solution below because holy shit, it just has to end.

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact