The Moment The FNAF Timeline BROKE

Creating a Five Nights at Freddy's

timeline

is a very interesting experience because no matter how many videos you watch, everyone's

timeline

will look different, even though everyone is dealing with the same games, no one can agree on a timeline. solid time of events. Scott was able to do this by choosing what key details to share and what not to share in the games. Additionally, Scott created a trilogy of books that takes place in a different timeline but has many of the same characters and plot points as After the Games, Scott began including plot points from the characters in the books. in games, such as the names William Aton and Henry Scott, began using the Trilogy book to answer questions in games, which then motivated the community to try to do the same in this single decision. opened the door to a world of new possible theories about this franchise and in my opinion there is no better example of this than this boy, as far as we know, he has no relevance to the story of FNAF, he is just a random NPC than the one crying boy passes by on the way home or are they as you can see, the boy is holding a stuffed trap doll, the same stuffed trap that we see in the miname of the FNAF 4 stuffed trap, this miname always seemed super random to me and never I really thought about it a lot until the sister location came out.

I've believed for a while that after receiving FNAF 4 Scott decided to change the direction of the story, there was no real way to find out what was going on. He knew he knew I had to go straight in and out like you know people aren't very happy about this. You know I need to make another game. I need to clarify this again. It was then that he decided to write the Silver I Trilogy and release the sister location. I believe the Silver I Trilogy and Sister Location were conceptualized at the same time and were both released less than a year apart from each other, and there are certain details from the books that I believe appear in Sister Location in Sister Location. see a map of the entirety of afton underground bunker on this map is every room we visited in the sister location, but also every place we visited in

fnaf

4 including the dormitory, fredbears house, and miname stuffed trap.

Throughout the map you can see a lot of dots the bright dots represent a human while the darker dots represent animatronics we have the Funtime Fred Baron animatronics Spring Bonnie the Nightmare Trap plush animatronic and one animatronic in each of the four closets in the miname plush trap this is strange because the plush trap is already accounted for, so what animatronics could be in those four closets? Well, let's look at the books. The Silver Ice trilogy is literally about Henry building four robotic recreations of Charlie after his death and keeping them in closets, hence the title of the final book.

Fourth. closet, so could these be the four book closets? Let's delve into the books. Henry was known for creating a lot of different toys for Charlie, such as a frog and a robotic stuffed bunny named Theodore. Charlie was carrying this stuffed bunny that his father made him. everywhere, but when Henry passed away, Charlie was forced to leave him in her childhood home, specifically she left him in her room where the closets resided, not only that date her father had named him Theodore, it was the size of a 3 year old boy. The boy at this time Theodore was sitting in a white wicker chair in the far corner of the room, so in the books we have the robotic stuffed bunny that Charlie used to carry around that is about the size of a 3 year old. .

He was left sitting on a white chair in the room where the closets were. This is almost exactly what we see in the Miname plush trap, a robotic plush bunny the size of a 3-year-old sitting on a white chair surrounded by four oddly placed ones. closets with supposedly an animatronic in each, not all the details line up perfectly, but they're not poop for the books, they're a different continuity from the games, this could very well be the game version of this scenario from the books, so If the plush trap is the game version of Theodore, all we need is a child in the games who is known for carrying plush traps and bonus points if their father made the plush trap specifically for them, just like Henry created Theodore for Charlie, see where I'm going?

Not only does this kid carry a stuffed trap doll, but his only literal line of dialogue is a quote: My dad says I have to be careful with him or I'll pinch my finger. He's a finger trap, he says all we need. Doesn't it say dad? Watch your finger, also, this kid is literally standing right outside Fredbear's Family Diner, which is the famous place where Charlie dies. It was also revealed in the books that Afton's secret bunker was directly connected to Henry's house, meaning that it is entirely possible that this Miname takes place in Henry's house Henry, all of this points to this boy being Charlie, But there's a problem.

I don't think this kid is Charlie. You could argue that he's just a lazy 8-bit Sprite, but I think it's pretty obvious visually that the kid doesn't look like Charlie. So, while I have some evidence that this kid could be one of the most important characters in the franchise, I don't think that's what Scott intended. I think Scott put those points in the cabinets in case he wanted to build. We'll talk about this later, maybe all of this is to say that there are endless theories you can make about this franchise. You can make almost anything make sense.

This is a franchise where there are things like illusion disks, illusion light bulbs, robots that can look like believable human time travel. ball pools robots that turn into humans humans that turn into robots computer programs that can brainwash people fazu that can completely replicate another person and now a robot that can imitate a person almost perfectly the reason Why so many theories and timelines can work is because almost anything is possible in this franchise. There are very few answers in the games, but there are so many possible explanations outside of the games. That being said, the big question is whether the FNAF timeline has a solution.

I think the answer is complicated after spending over a year trying to create my own timeline. video, one of the biggest problems I've run into actually has to do with this map, specifically this part of the map that features house Aton and the fredbears. It is widely believed that the Crying Boy's death was one of, if not the first, deaths in the timeline and in the FNAF 4 minigames we see the week leading up to the bite every day, Michael bullying the Crying Boy and he talks to his fredbear plush wherever he goes, this fredbear plush follows him and when FNAF 4 was released it was popular theory that this fredbear plush was an imaginary friend as he was able to move from one place to another by his own ways, switch to flowers and talk to the crying boy wherever he went, then the sister's location came up and it was revealed that the Fredbear stuffed animal might have not been an imaginary friend, but a surveillance system created by William Aton to carry out a monitoring the crying child, but there is a big problem with this, if Aton was at the Circus baby rental and entertainment center monitoring his child, that would mean that this bunker would need to have been built before the crying child was bitten and , therefore, before any death occurs in the franchise, that is, if you believe that the crying boy dies first, not only that in a recent Tales from the pizzaplex book it was revealed that the FNAF 4 bedroom is actually a fake bedroom pumped with hallucinogenic gas, the gameplay concept of FNAF 4 is literally Apon performing scare experiments on people, which is a big change in the timeline, because why would Aton build this underground bunker and perform these experiments back in 1983? before someone dies, he still has no motivation to do any of this, plus, this bunker was clearly built with the circus baby and the Funtime animatronics in mind, so if Aton was down here monitoring the crying child, the funny

moment

s had to have been built before his death, which seems too early even in the books, Aton doesn't create the funny

moment

s until well after 1983, all these problems arise because of this map and this stuffed animal with a walkie-talkie sitting at the desk, but I think there are solutions for this, as I said before, it was revealed in a recent Tales from the pizzaplex book that the game FNAF 4 often performs scary experiments on people.

This room is not above ground as we always think, it is literally underground in the Aton bunker. he built a makeshift bedroom in this bunker and if he could do it, I think it is very possible that this is not the house and the red bears that we see in FNAF 4, but a replica built by Aton to also conduct scare experiments. As for people, I really think that Aton was trying to replicate what happened with the crime boy by recreating his daily walk to Fredbears and his nightmares every night, which would mean that the Fredbear plush from FNAF 4 was an imaginary friend and the surveillance system we see in Sister. the location was for the people Aton was conducting experiments to try to replicate the crying boy's imaginary friend, fredbear, this is supported in the survival record book on this page in the survival record book says quote, do you have a stuffed animal or blanket you took?

With you everywhere, how about an imaginary friend with a giant image of the Fredbear plush at the bottom? It makes a lot more sense for him to be an imaginary friend. He knows things like where Mike is hiding and what specifically the crying boy saw. that the crying boy leaves fredbears and even asks for help when faced with a fredbear suit, not only is William Aton not a loving father, he could literally just go upstairs and help his son if he wanted, he doesn't need to talk through a fredbear plushie we also literally see Aton helping someone put on a suit in the back room while the fredbear plushie talks, which would make it impossible for Aton to speak through the plush.

We also have the FNAF movie where we literally see Michael's younger sister, Abby. In having conversations with her stuffed animal, the problem all these years is that there is evidence of both possibilities and I think that is because technically they are both right. I think what it's about is Aton trying to recreate his son's imaginary friend as he replicates every moment that occurred before his death. have others go through what his son went through, this allows for fun moments and the underground bunker is built after the crying boy dies, giving proper motivation and making more sense overall, another thing that absolutely breaks the timeline is the design of the withered animatronics. and if there ever was a non-withered version of them, some people think that the original Freddy Fazbear looked more like the FNAF 1 design and other people think that the original Freddy looked more like Withered Freddy, obviously there are two different signs, but which was the original, well, there is evidence. for both sides in FNAF 6 we literally get a logo for Fazbear Entertainment that features a wizened and immaculate Freddy, but recently we got Faz tokens where it says since 1983 Freddy Fazbear's Pizza with FNAF 1 Freddy's face in FNAF 2 we get these sequences of dreams about Freddy Bonnie and Chica from FNAF 1 on stage, this is great until you remember that FNAF 2 is a prequel, the FNAF 1 versions of these animatronics shouldn't exist yet, so how do these designs appear in someone's nightmares unless the FNAF 1 version of the characters are as they looked in the original Freddy Fazbear's Pizza.

It all revolves around what Scott was thinking at the time. He could have put the wizened, clean animatronics on that stage, but maybe he didn't have enough time to model them. Maybe I'll never know what I mean by Freddy Bonnie and Chica and the Follow Me minigames are literally a mix of the wither skins and the FNAF 1 skins with them with the Wither buttons, but chica has the FNAF 1 skin. I think Scott would be the first to admit that the early FNAF games weren't perfect, but they really didn't need to be. One could seriously argue that these inaccuracies, whether intentional or not at the time, are the reason people are still talking about these games almost 10 years later, as obviously as I'm going.

With my own FNAF timeline, I'm running into problems, problems that I'm increasingly convinced could be solved if we someday get that Fredbears or Fall Fest game from 1970. The first parts of the timeline are the more difficult to solve. For me, because we don't have enough information yet and, based on Carney from Fall Fest being a direct copy of Lefty in animatronic that he builtHenry, I can only assume we'll learn more about the origins of Henry and Fazbear's entertainment at some point. Soon, hopefully, I think if I wanted you to take anything away from this video it's that you should keep an open mind with FNAF theories.

I hope I have shown through this video and all my previous theories that there are so many different explanations for things in these games and while there are some confirmed details that it is possible to get it wrong most of the time, it's about using all the evidence we have and create a timeline that makes the most sense to you, be nice to people who create theories and timelines. It's all just for fun, looking forward to my FNAF timeline video coming out later this year. If you enjoyed this video, be sure to subscribe and thanks for watching.