Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Wednesday, May 6, 2020 [Finding Black Hole Structures]

It should at least be easy to identify. I don't know if it's fun and these ones here would be interesting. The two

black

hole

cases are also interesting, but I agree. I think so, okay, this has basically convinced me that I need to get my act together to implement the space. and highlighted separately as a branch for the multidirectional system because yes, it occurs to me in the case of the

black

hole

, it is impossible to know well because there could be a quote, there could be a branch like because Ledger is leaving the causal horizon, yes, we would still do it . right and that's the interesting case because that's the case where we can see quantum information basically flowing differently from the causal edges and so on exactly right and then we want to see the branch field graph comparison up.

Oh, the steps are already fine, so that's oh. yeah look there are disconnections yeah yeah they're disconnections this is a fractal it's a weird fractal oyd universe yeah so we should be able to see that let's see okay so it's all disconnected so this is a universe fractal. I wonder what is what. its space graph looks like um and then I want to look at the case of the two black holes and the M, let's see, let's go. List of state charts, look how trivial or not this is, it can't be that it doesn't, that's why, because it's a fractal well, that's why it's a fractal because the real universe is divided, yes, that's the case most end of a cosmic horizon with so many spaces, so we'll probably see, I mean, possibly up here, where it was, yeah, we should choose, well, let's look. let's look at this, let's look at this: the black hole case and unfortunately I have to leave soon because I have another meeting at 8:00 my time and Jonathan is to be commended because what time is it for you?

It's almost 1:00 a.m. m., but we have done worse, yes, we have done much worse, okay, so this is a question mark of two black holes, by the way, we do not see the manifold graph with a causal graph for this case. I thought that was what we had already gotten past the cosmological case, yeah, because I want to see if I think it's going to be easier to identify, yeah, so I think it's going to be a lot of identical pieces, I mean, we'll see, okay, what do you mean? How do I know what I want?

Eisen, I want to see if this can be if we really look at this point about this connection in the causal graph implies this connection in the multi is said to be two black holes this is something that says there is an initial yes, look, look, so Initially they are like event horizons of a black hole, but they become cosmological because if you look, there are two events going to the right and two events going to the left. Yes, that's how it behaves for at least two steps. or three steps, it behaves. I know you have three steps.

It behaves like the event horizon of a black hole and then simply becomes a cosmic one. I'm telling you there's a lot more variety in these horizons, so space tunnels could exist because there's more variety in the weird kinds of singularities that you can get, you know, in these kinds of models than in traditional general relativity, okay. , this is broken again, this again is spatially disconnected, not particularly, so this is, I mean, this is a deeply cosmological event horizon, so to speak, because real space, the real structure of space is disconnected, so which is something that can't happen in general relativity, right, well, I mean, you could formulate things that you know are disjoint unions of space like hyper I.

I understand about manifolds, what happens if you construct the manifold that way, topology that way, but it can't happen spontaneously and on the manifold you're stuck with whatever the manifold is? I think we're right, we see the multiple way that Matthew is a causal, yes, yes, um for this cosmological, let's not live, let's just do three there, okay, I'm convinced we can do six aap, wake up, hmm, it that we could use six, this is a strong argument in favor of the local multiplayer system. Wow, let's do three first. there we go, oh my gosh, okay, interpret, so I think the fact that there are so many, I mean, these are basically, I mean they're just events that happen separately in different components of the spatial graph.

I think the fact that there are a lot of parallel lines here is just the fact that things can happen independently in each component, true, but I don't know what this is at all and it doesn't disconnect or at least up to five events it's not so connected, yes I get it, but then we notice what does what. will happen for me, well there's more and more to understand, I mean you know, I didn't even have a chance to look or I was hoping we could see that there's something about the hairless theorem for black holes, but I haven't had a hole black clean enough that we could see that I was seeing causal edges entering the black hole what we want to be able to see after that is that in some way well, it's a little bit, I mean, the hairless statement should be that, of course, There are a certain number of ledges in the black hole and that's all you'll get unless more stuff falls into it, which is almost a trivial statement.

I'm not sure that's it because I'm referring to the head theorem. It doesn't tell you what's going on inside, it just says from an causal factor. The horizon is inaccessible to the outside, which is trivially true because that is the definition used, but it somehow indicates that there are still characteristics of what is inside that we can infer from the geometry of the external vault of the graph. causal, so in particular things like angular momentum, you know, our construction of angular momentum should still be possible even though the associated microstates are inaccessible, but we, when we are causal goths, know how we detect things because we have edges causals that enter the black hole, how do we detect things? detect the properties of the black hole by looking in the physical case, we would expect the structure of the spatial graph to be affected by the presence of the black hole because the black hole has many T minou associated with it, and the point is that its effect on the outside of the spatial graph is only as a result of the integral of your new and smoky one, so to speak, not the distribution etc., that would be the claim, hmm, so we should be able to see that once we know. we can identify a black hole, we should be able to see that in the structure of the spatial graph and then in the structure of the Judie Tzuke balls near the black hole, yes, that's what I'm saying, that there should be characteristics of the Bulk, you know the combinatorial properties of the causal graph that allow you to infer certain things about B about the X, but on the other side of the event horizon, although there is no way out because Legends, right?

Unfortunately I have to go to something else, um. This has been good as always um and uh sorry a bit of a cliffhanger no it's not really a cliffhanger you know it is so a cliffhanger would be I'm going to make a ridiculous joke I mean a cliffhanger is like you're hanging on the side of a cliff, at this point we have something much more dramatic which is the event horizon and the question is, do you know where there are tides? forces, as well as just the direct force of gravity anyway, it doesn't matter, um, so it didn't work at all well, well, um, okay, it will continue, I think tomorrow we'll see.

I just have to look. Oh, tomorrow we go. to look at the bell inequalities again and correctly this time yeah, well, this time we're really going to focus on the bell inequalities. I think so, um, and well, great, thank you all for joining us on the live broadcast and um, more than that. about the black hole soon, so see you later and see you Jonathan, Max, José, etc., okay, bye.