WNBA - How To Destroy Your Own League!

For almost three decades the WNBA has been the laughing stock and the shame of a professional sports

league

that only survives thanks to subsidies from the NBA, a

league

that if many of you saw having a game in

your

backyard you would call the police and report a crime in progress still for some, a possible turning point for this sad existence of a league has come in the form of a basketball Messi so far fighting here kitlin Clark ladies and gentlemen yes, Caitlyn Clark, the best and most popular player college basketball player of all time has announced she will be joining the WNBA next season and some think she can do for the WNBA what Larry Magic or Jordan did for the NBA and there is no doubt that Clark can play and it is exciting to watch However, anyone who knows anything about the WNBA knows the The league, its players and the media that covers it will

destroy

this opportunity to grow around Clark because, for Blunt, the WNBA players do not want Caitlyn Clark to succeed and They will make it difficult for you to do so and you may or may not wonder why.

True, but the reason is obvious, although many will shy away from saying it and the reason is that the WNBA is primarily made up of players who have been infected with the false ideas of modern feminism that focuses heavily on issues related to race, sexuality, gender identity. and participate in the Oppression Olympics and the players who have been infected with this ideology do not want Clark to be the face of the league and will do everything in her power to prevent this from happening. The first problem Clark will face is that she will be a straight player in a primarily LGBT dominated league, which some of you may think is silly and will have no effect, but don't take it from me, take it from the ex WNBA champion and number three draft pick, Candis Wiggins, who stated that 98% of the league is gay and that the toxic environment within the League affected her as a heterosexual woman and made her retire early, also saying that since her first moment in the league she was attacked and harassed because she was straight and popular nationally.

I imagine many of the other players were jealous and constantly trying to hurt her. For many, the message sent to Wiggins was clear: Many WNBA players didn't like Wiggins because she was a pretty good straight player who attracted media attention and they thought Wiggins didn't like her. He fit the mold of a player who properly represented the league and we must keep in mind that Wiggins was in a relatively similar position to Clark Wiggins was playing his last year winning a lot of awards just to get into the league and instead to be built around was torn down by jealousy and hate and after Wiggins came out with these comments the media did not support her but instead attempted to tear her down and diminish her by focusing on how the WNBA as a league was growing just so you know Miss Wiggins for the last time. the year 20,000 fans attended game five for the Minnesota Links is actually an increase of two years in a row. 20,000 fans at Game 5 in 2016 was the most-watched WNBA Finals in history.

Viewership has increased over the past three seasons. This is typical of the media in multiple ways they first attack anyone who has something critical to say about the WNBA and use half truths or outright lies to argue that the WNBA is doing very well, this is the worst, for example , noting an increase in viewership in just the last few years. I say things like most see finals in 20 years, but the league has been around for 30 years and if you look at the audience numbers since the beginning of the league you will see that the audience has still gone down tremendously, but the league and the media will continue to try create a positive narrative by saying things like this year's finals had the largest audience for a game three in 18 years without mentioning that there were still over 200,000 spectators missing for game three 18 years ago and that one of the teams that played in that I played a game that got more views and no longer exists, so think how these ideologically blinded WNBA media and motivated players will deal with Caitlyn Clark when we've already seen how they treated and covered Wiggins, except even worse for Caitlyn Clark. is that unlike Wiggins, in the minds of those who participate in the Olympic Games of oppression, Clark has the ultimate sin of being white.

White demons are the classic demon we know and we have already seen this be a problem for other WNBA stars, for example, Sabrina. ionescu, she is, of course, the player who took Steph Curry all the way in the Three-Point Contest, which was probably the most exciting thing about that dumpster of an All-Star weekend, like Clark Sabrina, who was a dominant college player who consistently won awards and served has higher attendance numbers for her college game than the average WNBA game, but since she's been in the league she's faced criticism from players and the media because she's white and Emmy-nominated sportscasters say straight up that the reason people aren't rocking Sabrina is because she leans on her white privilege and benefits from her whiteness and doesn't use it to elevate and amplify the voices of her peers of black jobs in the WNBA, then there were articles claiming that NBA 2k's decision to put Sabrina on the cover was based on race. and not Merit and if you go to the WNBA Reddit you will find many threads that say similar things and the

wnba

players made it clear that they feel the same as last year Sabrina ranked sixth among fans and the media among guards for the All-Star. but was ranked 19th by the players, the only plausible reason Sabrina was voted so low by the WNBA players is because they are resentful and jealous that a player who doesn't fit the typical WNBA mold was getting so much shine, so their jealousy was so strong, they were willing to have one of the most popular players not participate in the All-Star Game, which would have damaged their ratings;

In other words, WNBA players are willing to

destroy

their own league if the general public doesn't support the right type of players. and unfortunately Caitlyn Clark is not the right type of player because she doesn't fit the typical WNBA mold and will take attention away from the players who do and articles have already started to surface claiming that Clark's whiteness is the reason why which has been elevated. to Superstar status instead of you knowing the fact that she is actually a legitimate college Superstar who is scoring points at a level not seen since Pistol Pete and attracting more fans to the women's game than ever before, regardless of whether Clark has already started to be criticized by the WNBA Legends. the most notable is Cheryl, if you're going to break a record for me, if it's legit, you have to break that record in the same amount of time that player said it, okay, so if Kelsey set that record in 4 years, mhm.

Well, Caitlyn should have broken that record in four years, but because there's a CO year and then there's another year, you know what I mean, so she already had an extra year to break that record, so is it really a broken record? I don't believe it. but yeah, that will go down in the record books as Caitlyn Clark is the one of all time, whatever that may be. I don't even know what the number is, but it will be, so people say, damn, like he or she is killing them, but you, you. having a 25 year old girl playing against a 20 year old like you, you should kill them, yeah well Caitlyn Clark, get into the WNBA and do what she's doing right now, not at all, you're a hater, that's not going to pass.

Okay, Caitlyn. Clark right now is probably taking around 40 shots per game. I said it because when she gets to the league, regardless of what team she goes to and whether she has veterans on that team, she probably won't get 40 shots a game, as everything is rushed, I just said. is false, one has to wonder the real reason behind his criticism of Clark and there can only be one logical conclusion: Swoops like many in the WNBA do not believe Clark should be the face of the league due to jealousy and strange ideological beliefs, However, one thing he said is true and that is that a group of players who have been complaining about not being paid enough for years will gladly destroy their best chance of achieving that goal by not supporting Caitlyn Clark and allowing her to prosper. playing her game because of her jealousy and biased beliefs and if the fans get behind Clark and she starts to become the face of the league, the media could very well call her fans racists for not supporting the WNBA before Clark enter, basically doing everything in his power to alienate potential new fans.

So while no player in the history of the wnb ba will enter the league with the overall notoriety and ability to grow the league to levels never seen before than Caitlyn Clark, the WNBA players and the media that covers them, even DI fans, yes they will. It certainly nearly destroys this opportunity to take the WNBA to new heights, as those in and around the league subscribe to beliefs that simply do not allow them to build the WNBA around Caitlyn Clark, but rather urge them to tear her down of all people. modes. Thanks for See you next time and White Devils, this is the worst, why are you?