„Wir brauchen die Barzahlung – auch bei einem möglichen Blackout!“| Viertel nach Acht | Julia Neigel

Now we return to something tactile, namely money, and that is part of our big theme of digitalization. Ms. Tend, that is your big issue because you want cash to continue to be in our pockets, that not everything is digitized. Now they are plans that the Minister of the Interior has. However, a maximum limit of 10,000 euros raises the alarm. They fear that in the long term we will all have to pay without cash. the long-term plan At least that's what I heard in the speeches at the G7 summit. Then there was also a high-level conference on November 7 in Brussels where it was also mentioned that we wanted to go there.

Tell a little story I was at Frankfurt airport and I wanted to check my suitcase as usual and it was too heavy. I still had to pay something, I wanted to pay in cash and Lufthansa didn't want to accept it and. Then they blatantly told me that it is a cashless airport, as I said, it is useless because it is legal tender. I also wanted to go to the bakery to eat a slice of apple for €1.50 or something like that and. They said it was a cashless airport. Then I complained when I found it to the airport supervisory board, that's what it is for, it was the Hessian Finance Minister who told me that it is legal.

This legal medium is banknotes and coins and they actually have to do it. take them so there are these tests, Jean-Claude Juncker once said we'll test it and then we'll see how far we get and then we'll just test it in such an air-heavy environment and if you come across that then you do it when you pay the cash transmission fees, it is not taken into account that it is actually a small legal fact when I look at China and I look at this completely irrelevant EU parliamentary social circle, said Christian Teres in In a dictatorship, the state knows everything about the citizen In a democracy, the citizen knows everything about the State and I would prefer to have democracy, which means that I do not want to be a transparent person and I would also like to be able to pay in cash and agree.

According to article 128 of the EUA Treaty According to the Union Treaty, there is only one valid legal tender and they are banknotes and coins. Then there is credit money, which means you create something out of nothing, and then there is credit. bank money that is used internally to balance the parts. There are no digital euros there, that's what it means. It even violates Union law if the digital euro is now introduced without allowing all states to conclude it unanimously or without voting on whether to accept it. They would change the treaty because they cannot introduce it without changing the treaty.

They are already against this paragraph or this article 128. Completely different things 500 and 1000 euros because I am good, you are there for all eventualities, so I always have cash. at home because there are situations for me in which I need it and I am also someone who always thinks about that, I have no idea, now there will be a

blackout

, they also announced it, it can happen in the cities or we have, for example, more burning because no one can . get to the ATM, you can no longer withdraw money from anywhere and I will not allow myself to give my personal details even to a bakery at Frankfurt airport.

That does not work and I really ask all citizens to turn against it because this way of accustoming people to losing their freedoms is a wrong path that leads to a form of surveillance by the surveillance state. It already happened. I know I'm trying to use your money to make a transfer and mail. The officials insisted that he tell the purpose. Financing a brothel could also have written a donation for the naughty demise of the European Union, yes, and if it has to do with a bureaucracy that has been added. They have to do with that.

If you are past your prime before 45, then you are constantly committing such absurdities and you are a transparent person, and so am I, but I don't want to let it go. Going further and, for example, I only go shopping when I go shopping, I always pay in cash. Of course, I don't have credit cards, but I still pay for myself. It is a purely emergency situation. For example abroad, but I continue with this. I am the conservative. Cash, it's true, I always pay. So I know what I'm paying for. I also started working like that. I always have my money.

My job is cash and that's why I know how to handle money. For me the most important thing is to lose control of the card. Pay exactly with that and 1828 pay is yes, only money with cards. The danger we see in China is that people suddenly have. Their clients are blocked, they practically have to have a cell phone to be able to participate in society. I mean, who tells me I have to have a cell phone to enter the restaurant? You can go and make an appointment for the day as the ATMs are not working, you will meet tomorrow at the gas station, but joking aside, why are the people from the federal government talking about creating this limit of 10,000 euros?

That's the only reason they talk about, then. Even they don't see anyone else in this, they are consequences and the new money laundering law is the law and they are suggestions now that the 10,000 is still a good sum, not because others are talking about 2,000 euros less than 5,000 than the Italians they just increased since 2000. to 10,000 or even 12,000, I don't know exactly, but now they have gone up again, interestingly, no, they didn't say that, but you know that we liberals are now not in favor of cash if the EU decides to do it. that, then we as a country have to implement it in the country, this is how we can connect because article 128 is a home page, the same applies to the assumption of collective debts, there is hardly a law that EU countries do not still have. violated and that is being taken care of or not, how do you position yourself in this?

We just talked about digitalization, um, so we want that. Logically, the cash still has no upper limit, no, we will not do it exactly, the Minister of the Interior wants to go down to 5,000, as I understand it, Mrs Feser, yes, it is true, now we have to discuss exactly as always, but you could Now, make a counting list. Wait a minute, then Atom gave me citizenship. money and now we also have cash upper limits with the Home Secretary not being very fine, the list of toads is getting bigger, that's like yeah and the woman over and over again, so it's okay.

European money laundering law, we can't really do anything. Enforce legal regulations that First, make money laundering impossible. He was exactly at the end of his career before the EU revived him. I know that is part of the issue, but it is still known that the 500 euro note has been abolished. through money laundering No, that's not even supposed to be true, but no, the service provider can decide for himself about freedom and therefore all that is true, but cash, Of course, it also creates a lot of work for the retail sector. yeah and if they say that fewer and fewer people accept cash, that's not true, that's not true, that's despite the work they have to do with cash, despite the openness despite focusing on the poor, well , they continue to do it, they always prevent general suspicion, along with many other things, from appearing in the wrong place, exactly when I go out on the street I would have to go to the nearest district representative and prove that this is not the case.

I don't have a gun on me, which creates the general suspicion that I might have a gun on me and that's exactly why this law is that if you have a car, I would say that if you buy used cars, probably when you buy used cars, that's often. In the case, a lot of real money. He probably had 10 used cars too. I did not eat. The crime of the clan is currently being discussed. There is always some reason in general. Yes. Well, but it was given in a very specific way. The problem is homemade, so the cream of the clan is a reality.

I do not do it. I don't have to do it, give up my money, sorry, that's not our problem, so politicians have to make sure these parallel societies don't exist, sorry, yes, the federal government can do relatively little about it. Unfortunately, it is clear that the powers that be do that, but no, they must preserve their freedom, that is what they say, yes, even in the parties, well, really, to the question, then we leave the issue of the lost sound because that, of course, is the responsibility of the power. the respective local police and the local interior minister and they know that we have a good concentration of crime, if we want to talk about it in Berlin.

We have concentration in Bremen and we have concentration in the Ruhr area, these are the social democratic sense, This is a family that has spread everywhere and there are statistics about it, but in reality it is a state issue, it is not a federal issue, That's the problem we want to do. Change the basic law and abandon federalism. Maybe I should just accept the article. 128a EUV and not talking at the beginning, okay, let's talk