Who abducted two little girls from a football game in broad daylight? | Under Investigation

Tonight, under

investigation

, there is a vulnerable spot of evil in the city. Two

girls

kidnapped in

broad

daylight

at a soccer

game

. Disappearing forever the ordinary and ordinary of a soccer

game

with your parents. You don't expect to never see them again. now they had a description of a man who was hunched over and skinny, the significant thing about this man was that we investigated two known pedophiles who bear an uncanny resemblance to each other and to the man who was seen on The Day The Links, they are simply incredible. It's a big coincidence that we revealed a key confession, the confession is chilling, they were there the day a crucial witness when I saw his photo, I immediately said that's the face and the cutting edge technology that could finally solve the case, the fact that it has matches that similarity rating is very, very unexpected, it is pointed at One Direction, who talk about Kirsty Gordon and Joanna following those clues, you will get the answer.

Good night. I'm Liz Hayes and this is under

investigation

. I'm joined by Paula Donovan, award-winning journalist and author. Brian is literally an investigative journalist who has covered some of South Australia's biggest cases. Bill Hayes, former criminal squad and federal police detective and now private investigator, and Susie Ratcliffe. Sister of Joanne Radcliffe and co-founder of Leave a Light on, a charity that raises awareness about missing people. It was a crime that strengthened Australians: the era of innocence ended when two

little

girls

were kidnapped by a stranger during a family outing at an Adelaide

football

match in 1973. The disappearance of 11-year-old Joanne Ratcliffe and Kirsty Gordon, aged 4 Shocked Australia, thank you, but it also turns into one of the most baffling mysteries this country has ever seen.

As a lasting clue, this sketch of the suspect, a man seen making a hasty retreat from the Adelaide Oval with the girls. Brian, tell us why this case is still flourishing. such a terrible shocking moment in adelaide i think they thought two girls could disappear from such a public event never to be seen by a pack and with so

little

information coming from a crowd of thousands tens of thousands of people Paula what kind of people personal takes a couple of little girls from a very public place well, I think someone has confidence in someone who was able to leave a very public place, it was in plain sight and I think the most worrying thing of all is when they do it so easily Bill Hayes 49 years later, these cases have a lot of solutions, don't they?

Time is an issue in a case like this due to people's memory loss over time, but yes, it can be solved. Susie's time hasn't diminished your family's need for answers oh, no memories are fading, but hopefully with those memories fading loyalty to the suspects will fade too early in the 1970s Adelaide was a city full of life music festivals anti-war marches one of the country's most progressive and flamboyant prime ministers Don Dunstan and Football Mad Citizens, it is Saturday August 25, 1973. The

football

season is almost over, but at the Adelaide Oval, Norwood plays in North Adelaide with their families among a crowd of 13,000, Joanne Ratcliffe, 11, and Kirsty Gordon, 4, my parents. and my brother and sister were avid Norwood supporters, practically sitting in the same area every time they were there.

Joanne is a bright sixth grader who loves sports and wants to work with animals when she is older. Her protective nature makes her take care of the young. Kirsty during the soccer game, instead, Joanne's parents, Liz and Kathleen Ratcliffe, nor Kirsty's grandmother, Rita Huckle, are concerned when the two girls go to the bathroom together during the third quarter of the game. Susie, can you explain to me what you understand happened? My sister was a very responsible child and it was early in the game Kirsten needed to go to the bathroom and Joe offered to take her so they went to the bathroom and came back but then in the third quarter Kirsten needed to go again and rest from her week .

Joe and Radcliffe's mother. Kathleen becomes worried when the girls don't return, she checks the bathrooms but doesn't see them anywhere, she asks the football offers to make an announcement over the PA system but is told the game can't be stopped when she discovers that your mom. She had been to the office and asked for an ad to be placed on the oval. What was her reaction when they told her they said no? Oh, I was angry. You know there was a kid there and I know kids who wander around often forget that. They were supposed to be back somewhere, but she was Joanne Joanne wasn't like that and mom had emphasized to them that it was unusual for her and that something had to be done, but they just weren't interested, ladies and gentlemen, can I have your opinion? attention, we are looking for two missing girls, an announcement is finally made when the game ends around five o'clock, but by then Joanne and Kirsty have been missing for over an hour, part of the time problem is letting the game follow its course.

That was one of the reasons they ultimately postponed that announcement too late. The game would have been over if the crowd had been alerted. Witnesses may have seen what happened next very differently. Several people we know saw the children with a man and assumed it. it was obvious to the kids that they were being unruly and the announcement would be made, we may have prevented all of this from happening, of the 13,000 people who attended the game that day there are only a handful of witnesses, the girls were behind him and a little To the left I see that they walked towards the south entrance.

All of the Gates claimed to have seen a man with two girls. He walked right past the second tree and headed to the bathroom. He is described as a tall, middle-aged man with a thin face and wearing a wide-brimmed brown hat, a Czech sports coat and brown pants, that's something I won't forget, yes, the sap of the hat on his head was straight, the wing was straight, yeah, and he put something like that on top of everything. of these Witnesses have a similar description, don't they? Absolutely yes and that is important. Isn't it absolutely that consistency gives you some confidence in what you're looking for?

A witness reported that a man offered to help the two girls get the kittens out. under a car, something that rings true to Joanne's sisters, Susie, tell us what you know about Joanne's love of cats, us, love of cats, love of dogs, love of anything that have fur or feathers, so the fact that they were being lured by the possibility of having kittens doesn't surprise me and never surprised my family, it usually takes a decoy, doesn't it? And I think for people who are pedophiles, part of their success in their criminality, so to speak, is being able to engage children and establish a connection with them.

Anthony Kilmartin, a one year old boy, had noticed the girls in the football crowd while they were selling candy and then with his kidnapper he actually thought that Joe was very cute for his age because he is a similar age, yeah so ya You know the fact that I had been watching her. anyway, because he thought she was cute, he was able to identify many details, the detailed account of the man and the kidnapping that young Anthony gave to the police that day was critical to the investigation, this is a good witness, he is a witness eyewitness who can't be better than an eyewitness who is convincing and clear and understands what he's doing and understands what he's saying, so he tells us how well he basically saw the man take the children.

Joe was yelling at the guy and attacking him very bravely. I have to say the objective. It was obviously Kirsty, but Joe wouldn't let it go and you think Kirsty was the time because she's four, yeah, and they picked her up to take him under her arm, he wasn't really interested in Joe from what we heard, but the attack Joe's persistence meant that she too would have to be taken. Joanne's fight is what caught the attention of eyewitnesses and ensured an accurate description of her kidnapper, producing this identical police sketch. How credible do you think this description is then?

It is a good photograph that looks very similar to the man they saw that day, as you will see, the accuracy of this sketch will prove vital to our high-tech analysis later in our investigation. The important thing about this man was his hat. not a hat that would often be seen in Adelaide no foreigner August 25, 1973 Joanne Ratcliffe, aged eleven, and Kirsty Gordon, aged four, were kidnapped in

broad

daylight

at a football match in Adelaide. Multiple witnesses describe this man as the last credible sighting. by Joanne and Kirsty was written by a 14-year-old girl called Sue Laurie.

She saw the man walking across a footbridge near Adelaide Zoo, not far from the oval. Sue Laurie joins us from New York Sue. Thanks for your time. You can come back? until that day if possible and tell me why you were there and what you saw sure thank you Liz my father and my younger sister and I had been at the Adelaide Zoo my younger sister was four years old and I saw a man coming at a high speed I walked toward us carrying a little boy about the same age as my sister, so I had her about four years old running behind to keep up with him.

There was a girl a few years younger than me so I would have said she was about 11 years old and she was absolutely hitting this man as hard as she could on the back and saying "put her down, put her down" and she was so upset that he was tall, had a tanned, leathery face, a long face, and he wore a brown hat, a wide-brimmed hat. which was unusual and the type of hat he was wearing is not the type of hat South Australian men wore at that time in the early 70's. Can I ask you, Susie, when you hear the description?

I'll transport you back to that terrible time, I imagine. does and hearing Sue say you know Joe was fighting, no, it's okay, you know, it just de-escalates how proud I am that she fought so hard to help, but you know it's very confronting, plus knowing that. She had that chance Susie Radcliffe was born after her sister Joanne disappeared but she spent her entire life seeking justice for her. You feel confident that what Sue saw was that your sister was Kirsty, knowing that she knew Joe with everything I've learned about her throughout my life. You know, she just reinforces to me that yes, it was definitely Joe because that's the kind of kid he was.

A headline screamed the terrible news across Australia. Could you tell me your full name? Police launched a massive manhunt. Just hope it's private. Is personal. come to their senses and realize that they know the right thing to do is to give them back to us when this happens to a community, city or town, what do you do? Oh no, not again. The disappearance of Jane Anna and Grant Beaumont on Australia Day 1966 remains one of the nation's mysteries, seven years before South Australians were traumatized by the disappearance of three young children snatched from the popular and busy The city's Glenelg beach, now Kirsty and Joanne were taken from another iconic place in Australia, the hearing of their situation was kind. of the soccer game with your parents you don't expect these things to happen you don't expect that in 10 to 15 minutes of your son being away from you you will never see him again you never imagined this was going to happen to you you read about it in the news or You see it on TV or you hear it on the radio and you always think oh that poor family oh I'm glad it never happened to us Adelaide the city of churches prayed for the girls Quick return Phil, how quickly do you need to find witnesses for what cases How are these resolved?

The first 24 hours are essential. There is a lot of work to do in that period. The more time passes, the more difficult it becomes, but it would not be solved. In 24 hours, or 24 months, or 24 years, over the decades, it became one of Australia's most baffling crimes and then, in 2009, a play xler Ed, his grandfather at the Adelaide Oval that day of 1973. His name marks Trevor Marshall, a convicted pedophile. They claim that his grandfather, a man called Stanley Arthur Hart, had kidnapped and murdered Joanne and Kirsty Brian. Litley obtained a copy of that written confession, so an old ER during a prison phone call in which Mark Trevor Marshall repeated the story of him, the confession is chilling.

She was dead. She tells you that her grandfather was also there that day and they kidnapped the girls and took them to the countryside and they were murdered. My visions made many years later are clearly the words of a deeply disturbed man who rambles almost deranged at times, but also with enough detail to make them believable according to Brian Whitley and researcher Bill Hayes. Details that suggest he had some intimate knowledge of the crime. He was there with her grandfather that day. They took the girls. I believe it and I believe it because I feel that there ismany compelling facts that emerge from that confession once you delve into the layers of explanation, the layers of embellishment, there are facts there.

I agree, Freelance Brian, there are things in there that tell you to think that he does know what he is. Speaking of which, I have to ask Susie. This is shocking information. Can you tell me what you think? There is too much information and details there that are irrefutable. You know they are real. There are details that he came up with that I couldn't. He would have known unless he had met her personally. I agree with Brian and what Susie said that there are threads there that are possible and I think Marshall's grandfather, the man she accuses of the crime that was Stanley Arthur Hart, can easily be ruled out. interviewed by police days after the girls were kidnapped, but that investigation went nowhere, but tonight, in addition to his grandson's strange confession, we can reveal a series of compelling coincidences that strengthened the case against harm.

We know the police knew him. He had a reputation as a child molester a pedophile had multiple addresses for multiple connections in Adelaide where he resided. Our investigation has uncovered a witness who says he saw Joanne and Kirsty at a house where Stanley Arthur Hart lived. Our witness wants to remain anonymous, but former Detective Bill Hayes, who also investigated the kidnapping of the Beaumont children, spoke with him. Bill believes Hart was operating with other pedophiles in Adelaide during the 1970s and 1980s. He is in a pedophile ring. Yes, he seems to be at the heart of that network.

He was a very active pedophile and was very well connected. It is this? information he has obtained while researching this. I am very familiar with how pedophiles operate, about the similarities in the geographical profile of the area they are hunting, they feel comfortable within a certain area, in this case the heartland was about five kilometers from the Adelaide Oval. Well, within that geographical profile that you might expect with the constructed hunt, would you be surprised to learn that the place where Stanley Hart was residing at the time was an address that was within sight of Rita Huckle and the house Kirsty Gordon left behind Rita Huckle Was it Kirsty?

Gordon's grandmother, who took Kirsty to the football match that day, the house where Stanley Arthur Hart lived at the time was just a street from Rita's house, she may have been able to sit on her porch, have a cuppa of coffee and see them. Initially I went out for food when I looked at him I thought he was opportunistic I just picked a boy and left but he lived close to the grandmother where the boy was staying at the time. I started with the one I actually saw, the boy followed him to look for an opportunity. and I got it, it's aiming at One Direction, it's aiming for Stanley's heart, two girls are kidnapped one August afternoon at a football match in Adelaide, eleven-year-old Joanne Ratcliffe and four-year-old Kirsty Gordon, never again.

They will be seen after that. One day in 1973. I certainly believe that the evidence we revealed tonight Joanne was still alive when they arrived after the first girl died first, including an extraordinary confession from her grandson half a day after she was dead, points to a pedophile. that is known to be operating. In Adelaide at the time his name was Stanley Arthur Hart, but this is where this already baffling mystery takes a turn that is barely believable 27 years after the Adelaide Oval abductions. The crucial eyewitness who was there that day Sue Laurie made a positive identification of the man she saw drinking Joanne and Kirsty Sue were 14 at the time, but she recognized him when she was shown a photograph of an alleged pedophile in Queensland, but he was not Stanley Arthur Hart.

An incredible turn. The pedophile she identified had an almost identical name. Arthur Stanley Brown. I have a very clear image of him in my mind and that's why years later when I saw the photo of him, I instantly said that's the man who is the face of New York. Sue Laurie confirms her certainty about the man she saw that day in 1973. We have that photo. there for you and you want to take a look at him and that's the man you think you saw that day oh absolutely, the long face, the hat he's wearing in that photo is different than the hat he was wearing that day, but that's definitely the face The coincidence is extraordinary queenslander Arthur Stanley Brown and South Australian Stanley Arthur Hart bill when you look at that, are you thinking what's going on here?

I thought it was all a big coincidence of how they were both looking for a start with the hats they wore second and the names, the very similar resemblance that characterizes the fact that they are both pedophiles, the links there are just incredible. I wonder if they know each other, do you know if they have worked together or if they have history. Taken together, it is one of the theories that Brown relies heavily on in identifying Sue Laurie. Dozens of media reports have linked him to Joanne and Kirsty's kidnapping, but there is no hard evidence of his involvement or even that he was in Adelaide at the time and, more importantly, although accused of the rape and murder of two other children he died an innocent man but we have located a member of the mimos family who says his perversion was public knowledge.

I met Arthur Brown because he married my mother's cousin. There was something about him when I met him. I was just a kid, I just didn't like him, it eventually got out in the family, but on one occasion he had abused many young girls, just girls in the area. MIM says Arthur Brown made a chilling comment when he was with her. at the local primary school where, disturbingly, he worked as a casual handyman, those girls are just little pranksters, these are the school girls and I said why would you say that and he said because they're going to get something from men who they worked there they got in trouble one day, but the alleged abuse of Arthur Stanley Brown went unreported for years, he was a basically unknown man, yes, and it went unnoticed and I think when you review the victims of child sexual abuse claims, They were constantly talking about him wearing his maintenance uniform, the guy fixing something at school, a member of his family talking about him, encouraging the students to call him uncle, the childhood activities of horseback riding, swimming, and all that kind of stuff. they turned into him sexually abusing them in the front seat. of the car while he drives sexually abusing and raping victims in the house he shared with his first wife, Mimos says Brown's first wife, Hester, showed him a secret room in the house that reveals terrible clues about the behavior of Brown.

He was out one day and she said to him, Yo, let's go take a look in that room, so we went in there and found all these books, all true stories, apparently of women who have been mutilated and raped and bottles of wine. Little did we know at the time that this was what Arthur Stanley Brown would become at the center of a shocking Queensland crime in Townsville in 1970. It's a crime with a sickening similarity to that of five-year-old Joanne Ratcliffe and Kirsty Gordon. Seven-year-old Susan and Judith Mackay were kidnapped at a bus stop on the way to school, just 300 meters from their home.

The father comes home to find Thelma McKay, his mother, panicking because they haven't returned from school. Queensland. Journalist Paula Donovan reported on the case and spoke with the family. A witness claims to have seen the sisters in a car with a man who appeared dark, so the last seen of those girls is as the Browns heading south from Townsville and then. Peter is never seen alive again 25 kilometers southwest of Townsville at Ant Hill Creek Small footprints in the sand LED finders on a child's body Susan Mackay was found wearing only her underwear. She had been raped, strangled and stabbed in the chest 70 meters downstream.

It was her older sister, Judith, who had also been raped and then strangled to death. Brown was one of the first suspects in this horrible crime, but a series of police errors caused the case to go cold. Brown's niece, MIM Moss, however, always became more suspicious as time went by. and brown was saying to Andy Hester and my sister and me, well, why don't you let me take you to Ant Hill Creek so you can see where those girls were murdered? And I thought of a strange compulsion that you finally had 28 years after the murders. MIM Moss called Crime Stoppers so strangely that the two detectives who arrested him when they showed up at the house were almost hoping he wasn't surprised when they announced that we're from the homicide squad and we have a warrant right at his house. . home and we heard about the Makai sisters murders and it was almost like someone showed up saying, can I borrow a cup of sugar?

On December 3, 1998, Arthur Stanley Brown was charged with the rape and murder of Susan and Judith Makai, he claimed that he had never heard of them and his trial resulted in a hung jury. A new trial was ordered, but despite police protests, Brown was declared unfit to stand trial. A year later, in 2002, he died an innocent man. Former detective Bill Hayes has detailed knowledge of the case and says he has few doubts about Brown's guilt and his ability to carry out another crime, that of Adelaide girls Joe, Ratcliffe and Kirsty Gordon, kidnapped at a party football three years later, but unlike the Makai sisters, Joanne and Kirsty's bodies have never been found.

Playing someone like Brown The Killing itself was the most disgusting thing I've ever read, I think, and he has a touch of a psychopath, a very dangerous predatory pedophile with psychopathic tendencies. Tonight we are investigating one of Australia's most disturbing child abduction cases. Joanne Ratcliffe, aged eleven, and Kirsty Gordon, aged four, taken from the Adelaide Oval during a football match in 1973. The ordinance of a type of football match with your parents you don't expect you will never see them again There is a part vulnerable area of ​​pedophiles who walk among us in broad daylight. The two suspects we have identified share uncanny similarities.

Not only do they both appear to match the identical police sketch of the Adelaide Oval suspect, but their names are eerily close: Stanley Arthur Hart and Arthur Stanley. Brown, who was accused of the horrific rape and murder of two young sisters, Susan and Judith Mackay, in Townsville in 1970. A very dangerous predatory paedophile. Psychopathic tendencies, could this Townsville man be responsible for the kidnapping of Joanne Ratcliffe and Kirsty Gordon in 1973? Absolutely, the possibilities are there and do you think he looks like this man from the police identity? His face is a little longer in reality, but it fits well in the photo and could fit in heart or brown.

There are so many similarities in the fact that they were. under the radar, they went unnoticed in their activity, but they were so prevalent in that child abuse, yes, it's like they learned from each other, yes, yes, and I guess I'm also referring to some of the similarities that both crimes had place in a matter of 10 to 15 minutes they were hit quickly, they hit quickly, they hit confidently and where there was no behavior or alarm with the kidnapped children to the point where anyone would interfere at the time I witnessed. Sue Lowry made a convincing and detailed identification.

He was tall. He had a tanned, beaten face, a long face and he was wearing a brown hat, a wide-brimmed hat, which was unusual. She has always maintained that the man she saw at the Adelaide Oval was Arthur Stanley Brown. She identified him 27 years after the crime when he was arrested. for the two child murders in Queensland, but Sue was never formally interviewed by police then or later. Have they ever shown you a photograph or the sketch identified by the police? No, so they didn't offer you any images to look at. No, no, there is this. another man who has now also potentially been identified his name is Stanley Arthur Hart have you heard of him?

I can't show you a photo of him to see for sure what he thinks. No. The face is very different. His face is much rounder than the other. man, I saw it, so don't feel like that's the man, no, no, it's a riddle within a mystery, two men, two pedophiles with eerily similar names and appearances. Bill Sue is a very confident witness, yes, a very good witness, particularly at 49 years old. Their memory serves them remarkably to help unravel this mystery. We will use cutting-edge facial recognition technology, the world's most accurate algorithm developed by global company NEC.

What I'm going to do is load the sketch from 1973. It uses biometrics to map. facial features and compares the information to a database of photographs to find a match and simply make sure the eye placement is correct. It is the same technology used by the Australian Federal Police and recently used by the Australian War Memorial to identify 60,000 unknown soldiers who We will test this sketch against the photographic database.The database contains 5000 images chosen at random to provide a comparison with the identical Adelaide abductor ovale sketch. Three images of Arthur Stanley Brown and three of the stern Arthur Hart are entered into the system.

Hopefully we'll see the brown or the hearts appear at the top of the shortlist and you'll join us tonight with the results of this innovative technology from NEC Senior Advisor Sylvia Yesterbiak, so on this basis of data we have three images of brown and three images of heart, as you can see, the brown is in position one, three and four, which is very, very consistent, it means that the algorithm thinks that there is a very, very strong link between the face of Brown and identification. Generally, we're trying to match photographs to photographs, so the fact that he linked Brown to a sketch is very, very notable and very unexpected.

It tells us, according to his technology, that Brown agrees with much from the heart. Yes, he is decisively choosing Brown over heart. Brown absolutely matches the identified one. Yes, decisively and Sue just confirms it. You have no doubt I have no doubt that this is the man I saw abroad. It is one of the most baffling child abduction cases in Australian criminal history, but perhaps tonight we will be closer to determining who took Joanne Ratcliffe and Kirsty Gordon. from the Adelaide Oval on that fateful day in 1973. Two known Queenslander pedophiles, Arthur Stanley Brown and South Australian, Stanley Arthur Hart, incredibly similar in appearance, age and name, can be linked to the crime, the hats they wore and the names, it's incredible, it's a great coincidence, Joanne. live when they came after the first girl died first, we have revealed the confession and a series of compelling coincidences linking Stanley Arthur Hart to the crime against that.

Sue Lori is certain that the man she saw was Arthur Stanley Brown when she saw the photo of him. I instantly said that this is the man with the face, a man whose niece believes was more than capable of this vile act and who the police believed was already guilty of kidnapping and murdering two sisters in Queensland three years earlier, but eventually it was okay. known through family, but had abused many young girls. We also get evidence that Brown may have been in Adelaide around the time of Joanne and Kirsty's disappearance and finally there is our world. first facial recognition technology that has identified Brown as an extraordinary match to the identical police sketch of the suspect that Brown matches the identifier yes decisively so who is Arthur Stanley Brown or Stanley Arthur Hart Bill Hayes could both be?

There is absolutely every possibility that boss had a connection to Queensland heart and brown, they may have met through pedophile forums and it is quite possible that brown was here at that particular time so put all that together and yes , it's possible, but without a I doubt it's possible, so if Brown was the man he could have been the associate, as Phil says it's certainly a possibility, uh, he's familiar, he was, you know he was displaying his confidence , so you think Brown is capable, yes, I think he is capable of the Makai murders. The sisters talk to Brian, you've been on this case for a long time and you've found a confession from Heart's grandson.

You would find so many things. Do you still think that's where the truth is? I believe that the truth is in the heart. but I am absolutely willing to accept that there is a possibility that it could be brown 100. I think what this does is it makes a really strong case for following to the end those things that have been put forward as real, real evidence or clues and I think that by following those clues you will get the answer, yes, Bill, this is absolutely a solvable case, it really is, in no case. Beyond solving, we are against the clock, obviously, but people talk to people and someone might know something that I don't realize until the light turns on when watching a show like this.

One thing I would like to say before I finish is in relation to trying and being relative. That girl deserves a bravery award. She sacrificed herself, so Kirsty sacrificed her life for the fucking Susie Radcliffe she never met. her older sister, but she has never stopped searching for Joanne and Kirsty, the children whose disappearance broke the hearts of her family. Susie, the important thing for you is that the light doesn't exactly go out. I mean, we've been fighting for 49 years for answers. to bring the girls home, sadly for my family, you know, my mom, my dad and my brother have gone to their graves now not knowing what happened to the girls, but they are still family members left behind and always They will hope that we get our chance to bury them.

Justice has never been served for Joanne and Kirsty. The man who took them is probably dead and, as we have revealed, was quite possibly one or even both of the men we investigated tonight. There are no other credible suspects in this case, but justice can still be served, so if something in our investigation has sparked a memory or perhaps sparked the need for someone to reveal a long-kept secret, we ask that you call to Crime Stoppers at 1 800 Triple Three triple zero. I want to thank you all very much for joining me tonight. A really important story and I want to thank you.

I'm Liz Hayes. Good evening, hello, I'm Liz Hayes and thank you for watching under investigation. Subscribe to our channel now to see exclusive clips and not. Don't miss the full episodes of Under Investigation on nine now and the nine Now app