What if Hitler Never Invaded Russia

ramps into

what

would seem comical if it weren't deadly serious. The Germans at least have their Schwimmpanzers, swimming tanks, which can float on water and have a propeller to make them move forward. They also have the Tauchpanzers, which, being completely waterproof, can pass through water. The British do not know that the Germans have converted hundreds of tanks in this way. They have also developed the Seeschlange (Sea Serpent), a floating bridge that can be attached to ships from which vehicles and men can be disembarked. The Germans make these things at a surprising rate, knowing how important they are.

In fact, much of the German equipment used in this invasion is state-of-the-art and has barely been tested before. Not only are they throwing all their manpower and their machines at the British, they are also throwing all their brainpower. At the same time, the entire fleet of the British Navy is now focused solely on this invasion. However, the Navy is actually deceived by a cunning German plan called Operation Herbstreise. This is a huge convoy of German transport ships sent to the east coast of England. The British have to defend this, so the British ships head to this area.

The reason this is misleading is because those German transports are totally empty. The move is a ruse to lure the British to the east while a German invasion force is transported by barge to the south coast. We must also state that while the United States is not fighting, it is sending weapons to the British under the Lend-Lease agreement. This helps the British cause considerably, and since the equipment reaches northern ports, the Germans can't do much about it. So with all this effort, could Germany have successfully

invaded

Britain? Most historians conclude that no, it could not have happened, even with the full force of Germany.

Simply carrying supplies, thousands of tons, across the canal would have been a logistical nightmare. We assume that in our current scenario, many things have to go right for the Germans to succeed. The weather would also have played an important role and would have been critical to Germany's success in this invasion. There are also other issues, such as military intelligence. In this sense, you could say that the British were the kings of the world. Still, if German spies, under Operation Lena, had been successful, things might have been different. And so even if the Germans somehow managed to occupy Britain, they would have had to rely on the help of British fascists to maintain control.

Hitler, of course, as described in his “Black Book,” would have ensured that all of his enemies were captured and probably executed. In reality, the invasion of Germany would have weakened the army so much that the Soviets could have intervened later and exploited Germany's vulnerabilities. The fall of Europe to the fascists or the communists was not great news for the United States. As Churchill had warned, he could have been next. The relationship between Germany, the United States and the Soviet Union was complicated. Recall that Time magazine named Stalin Man of the Year twice, and Hitler won in 1938.

This did not mean that Time was saying that Hitler was a good man, just that he had considerable power. He had the biggest influence that year, good or bad. Time wrote: "Without losing blood, he reduced Czechoslovakia to a German puppet state, forced a drastic overhaul of Europe's defensive alliances, and gained a free hand in Eastern Europe by extracting a 'non-intervention' pledge from powerful Britain (and later France), Adolf Hitler, without a doubt, became the Man of the Year of 1938.” We mention the Time thing only because we think it shows how powerful America thought Hitler was. As Time said, Hitler was changing the face. of Europe and most Americans had no intention of getting involved in that.

We have to wonder if Pearl Harbor would have happened in this alternate reality because if it did, the United States could have joined the war and helped Britain out. If that were the case, perhaps the Germans would not have been successful in invading Britain. Still, if the Germans had not fought the Soviets, we do not believe the Japanese would have launched their attack on the United States. After all, it would have been worrying about that huge Red Army that was sitting idly in the Soviet Union. Still, if Britain had been on its knees, the United States would have understood the existential danger it faced.

So let's imagine that the United Kingdom and the United States end up defending Britain after a German invasion. This would have been a tremendously brutal war. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union would have watched with glee as these three powers weakened. If this had happened, the Soviet Union could have quietly turned into a beast. We believe the British, Americans, and other Allied nations would have been successful, but things would have ended very differently than our timeline. Japan would not have been attacked with nuclear bombs, but the British and Americans would have made them anyway. We just didn't think in our alternate timeline that the war would have lasted long enough for the bombs to be ready for use.

Germany would have agreed to withdraw from the war if conditions were fair. That is why the meeting we talked about at the beginning takes place. The Soviet Union and Germany were always far behind the British and Americans when it came to making the atomic bomb. There is a possibility that they could have used it in Germany, but as we said at the beginning, that meeting takes place in 1943, before the bombs were tested. With the United States and the United Kingdom allied, Germany agrees to withdraw without the use of nuclear bombs, but if the war had continued, they would undoubtedly have been used against Germany.

We haven't even mentioned the Holocaust, which would have been discovered at one time or another, but as things stand at that meeting, much is unknown outside of Germany. The Nazis make sure to hide much of it before and after making peace. Of course, since the year is 1943 and Germany has not

invaded

Russia,

what

happens in those camps is considerably different from what happened in real life. Still, Germany would have continued with its extermination program no matter who they attacked. After all, hatred of the Jewish people was one of the main driving forces of the Nazi party.

His paranoia about ruling Jewish agents and his belief in Aryan superiority would have been the same in any scenario. So what would happen if that meeting took place and Germany agreed to withdraw as long as it got what it wanted in terms of territories? Germany would have been weakened considerably fighting the Allies in Europe, and the Soviets would have remained intact while making money in the war. Yes later, Stalin launched attacks in Asia and also against Germany. There is a possibility that the United States and the United Kingdom may also be involved. The communists, as happened in real life, would have taken over much of Eastern Europe and in this reality Stalin could have moved to Western Europe.

Germany would be destroyed, not being strong enough to defend itself. The Cold War was inevitable. The Soviet Union would be the strongest country since the United States and the United Kingdom had invested so much in their war with Germany. However, the only thing that scares and bothers Stalin is the fact that the US-UK alliance invented the nuclear bomb before him. As happened in real life, a Cold War would have ensued, only with a stronger Soviet army and a weakened Allied army. Still, the result, in the end, would have been quite similar to what happened in real life.

What could have been different is for the United States to launch a nuclear attack on the Soviets. We're just not sure what the Soviets would have had to do to make that happen. However, it is very likely that those first bombs would have fallen on Russia instead of Japan. Now you need to see "Hitler's plans for the world if he wins." Or take a look at "Europe if Hitler Won."