What Did This Drama Channel Have To Hide? - Spill | TRO

Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the right pinion, the home of someone with too much time on their hands and who is the man behind

this

channel

. Who I am? To be honest, it's not a big deal and I would prefer to keep my identity mostly private. but at

this

point it's a little late for that big thank you to the news website you posted my name on, however it doesn't

have

much importance in the overall discussion because I'm just a person presenting

what

they know and

what

they think and honestly. The people behind the respective YouTube

channel

s are not that important in the grand scheme of things and therefore it seems so strange that the current situation seems so much more important, there are too many craters than it would seem on the surface, but Let's get back to the tea community because what's wrong with a little tea?

The tea community has many players in its complex game, first of all, the big beauty creators who produce content for millions of people, this content does not present problems in principle, but, as has been observed, their behavior can be quite melo

drama

tic . and as the reason why the word melo

drama

tic has the word drama along with drama, people came with opinions on that drum and people who watched the drama and analyzed the drama and who would

have

thought that you could even say that some of these channels provided commentary Now normally the people who provided comments were people with a certain level of competence in reporting this drama.

The style may not exactly be for everyone, but they have an audience and it seems like many of them are legitimately invested in the outcome of this drama. These craters may be quite sensational and some are as dramatic as the genre they cover and honestly, that's fine as long as people don't expect anything else from those channels, that's what comments, ideas based on opinions and yes You don't agree with that person. That's fine too, however, at the same time, some people may want a deeper perspective on you. Many commentators are not very involved in it and that is perfectly normal, since not everyone has time to sit down and talk. thorough summary of something that is not really the most important thing in your life, however, there is a demand and that demand exists in all genres, so, naturally within the beauty community, eventually a channel will emerge with a Little more focus on creating long-form content. the focus on the delivery and depth of information rather than almost the visceral reaction to it childhood seems to respond to these sentences was created by the name

spill

as the rather simplistic name that the content never assumes too much about the topics it It covers and focuses more on delivering this information in a journalistic and well-placed manner, and the conclusions are often well-informed to provide some additional information.

They started their channel on September 5, 2018 and in the following year they have amassed a pretty healthy 930K subscribers, often receiving praise from many audiences and creators for representing information in an unbiased and comprehensive manner. They also seemed to be creating this more deeply rooted Nexus, which is our word of the day for the way this was represented by three additional ones. Brew Grill and on the hill channels, which will have their own dynamics, were good at what they did, however, perhaps too good, in recent months suspicions have been raised about the existence of

spill

s and whether everything is as normally assumed , it would be What do I mean?

Many people have expectations for these channels and comment channels are generally expected to be a little more personal because it's hard to accurately represent the opinions of a corporation with that spill, but the line of actual opinions is now so direct. too far from the safety of what they could present as real evidence, however, some felt that their content, although of good quality, was not what should represent a community for reasons that we will discuss in due time with some YouTubers, including D'Angelo and Patti Page. Posting videos expressing concerns about the origins of the Spills channel and the idea that they actually represented this corporatization of even the most independent genres on YouTube, the family-friendly nature of Sanitary was somewhat uncomfortable and people began to create more hypotheses about the nature of its existence, where being planted by YouTube to deal with these annoying independent creators or to create the perception that YouTube is just a squeaky clean platform for advertisers or the media, given its incredible growth, was a disturbing thought and has led to many to theorize about the origins of such a channel, combined with the deep monetization and censorship that has been unleashed by the prostrate creatures within this community, led many to believe that there may be a larger agenda at play, however, with all growing uncertainty, they decide to explain their origins in a video.

It started as a two-person passion project, one of us has a background in journalism, the other has a background in illustration and video editing. We both love news and YouTube dramas. Who does not? We wanted to create a channel that had a more journalistic approach. to YouTube drama, a comprehensive summary of all sides of a story with appropriate quotes, on top of that, we wanted to give something back to the community by contributing to the conversation with an educational approach, keeping up with celebrities and influencers is something we many of us like it. It's a guilty pleasure, but it can get toxic, which is why we discuss the big topics and open up the conversation in this video.

They say Spill originated as a two-person passion project that focuses more on presenting the drama from a neutral perspective. that often when covering these topics, given the immense workload they would have to go through to create this, when they realized that they were actually determining a significant level of success, they decided that more people would be needed to help expand this project and this eventually led to their own side projects including Brew Grill and On The Hill, ultimately the core principle they began to believe in still held true. Their commitment to delivering content based on those principles had not changed.

They note that they have been incorporated, however this was just from perspective. that they would have a lot of people and would be easier to join for tax purposes, it initially started as a side project, but once Bill started growing the team group, this way we can release more high quality videos at a faster pace . but at the end of the day we are still individual content creators who love what we do and are proud of the work we put into our videos. As soon as more than one person is working on a large project together, it is legally the best option. registering as a corporation in Canada there are three types of business structures sole proprietorship and corporation a sole proprietorship is an unincorporated business owned by a single person, such as a graphic designer, a partnership is a joint relationship between two or more people who work together in a business, but each person is personally responsible for profits and losses.

The final option, the corporation, tends to be the best option for teams of more than one person because, among other reasons, it offers limited risk to the business owners - basically, you are only on the hook for what you invest in the company. company rather than everything you own as an individual, so for many self-employed or small businesses it makes more sense to incorporate for tax reasons. They provide some sources that justify their reasoning and claim that they have no contacts on YouTube. and there is no evidence to disprove this, it all seems very reasonable on the surface and in a normal world on the surface we could go about our daily lives, but behind the scenes something was brewing and it wasn't just tea, join me today as Les I tell an interesting little story about a boy that wasn't as clear as they could have been and exactly why it might have been that way and whether it matters at all, but I wouldn't start making a video like that if it did.

Doesn't matter, well, there's only one way to find out. Let's start with the surface. It seems strange that someone wouldn't be entirely honest about the origin of their channel unless it's about money laundering or something, so you'd really need proof that things are not what they seem, however, one of the people I mentioned earlier, Patti Page, released another video refuting this revealing video and presenting interesting information in her video, she describes how in fact the corporation in the spill appears to be registered under not her own but actually another corporation called odd or aw II D whose existence appears to have been conceived around 2013.

This evidence can be found on Canadian websites, leading Patti to think that this specific corporation is the one handling the spill. Well, there is a lot. of considerable evidence relating to employees and, most notably, those considered to be working for both spills and strangers. I agree that the most incriminating factor was the fact that the voices of a person named Taylor Barrett had been listed under the strange core. compelling circumstantial observations, such as the bat, that at this time when the beer was installed there was a decrease in posts on other car ownership sites, such as good good and their relative Facebook pages, that energy must have been going towards something However, that doesn't necessarily prove the channel's strange setup.

A few months ago I covered a situation involving Smosh and how they were bought by another network, if that was the case why did they claim in their video that they had been incorporated with an emphasis on fiscal prospects instead of? I just said that they had contracted with the largest corporation, the corporation the spell appears under is called Awet. Now I searched online and found out that the AWD court was incorporated in 2013. I even paid the Canadian government to obtain the certificate of incorporation for Awet Corp, which means that the person behind Spell Taylor would have been 17/18 years old when it was incorporated. became a corporation, so something didn't add up to this, the fact that the two people who supposedly founded the channel were still working jobs to earn enough income. about a kid who could potentially be making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year I told people it had to be some primary beneficiary because it didn't really make sense otherwise I don't want to exaggerate the potential right now, but these people are throwing away money away, but we'll get to that in a moment, regardless of the outcome, whether the orders were involved before, after many believe this would still go against the overall tone of their video, which frames them as people who have control of your channels.

Canadian small businesses that want limitations. The risk is that you need to register as a corporation and we are not the only YouTubers incorporated. Many other individual creators and small teams are registered as corporations or LLCs like Shane Dawson. It's just not logical that the test guys and Philip Defranco can see registration as a corporation is complicated, you may be thinking that it all sounds very boring, well the truth is that it is a legal thing, it's boring even for me, even for you , you are the one who did the legal work to incorporate, it doesn't seem like it and you really wanted to. to give spill the benefit of the doubt, but this is neutrally ambiguous language.

If you watch the original video, you get the impression that they, as individuals, start the channel and then incorporate it themselves, which is simply not true, but it wasn't. You see that the spill responded in a second video that was much more complete. They open up by stating that they didn't feel that the details they had left out in their original video were completely relevant to the story of the spill, and honestly, this video clarifies quite a bit. some things but at the same time I think it is correct to take some themes, they continue their introduction by showing us a man known as rollin or a spill refers to him as the man who made all this possible what happens next is an inspiring rag for history of wealth, so growing up we were members of a rich family, I mean, we had everything we needed, but like any extra toy or game or anything that one really wanted as a child, it wasn't something that was easy for my parents to get. .

I felt like if I had more money, I could get whatever I wanted. Rollin got his first job as soon as he was old enough to work, but he quickly realized it wasn't for him, but when I got my first job. I would like to be 15 years old. I hated him so much. I hated having a boss. I guess the first boss I had was my first job. He was such. I hated working for him and I remember thinking that's just how it is. have a job, but I don't want a job, I want to solve my own things.

I mean, it's very nice to hear, but not reallychanges a lot, although pro Rouge permeates the upper echelon of many industries, there are many. people with rags to riches stories doesn't necessarily make you a great person either, but it's good for you at least you know I hated having bosses too, but that doesn't make a company any less corporate. It's nice to know there's a human at the center, but that's also why it can be a problem and I'll discuss it later with all that in mind. It's a pretty inspiring story if you're honest and I'm happy that this bill has brought Ronan levels of success, but back to the topic.

Grits throughout the video there is this tone that attempts to undermine the notion of onboarding as something quite normal and it feels like they are trying to combat the negative stigma that comes with the onboarding process, the three of them were sure. They would eclipse Reddit, so Rollin incorporated fever eyes. We incorporated fever eyes because we thought it would be the next big thing, so why wait? Let's do it right away. We were a team of three, obviously, as a partner, you know what partners you have to make sure everything is that closed. We did it in the corporation.

Actually, I don't think there is a Problem with embedding, if you want to do it, that's fine, but I think the problem is not spilling. I know that the way people define corporate-run channels is very different from a channel that has been started by an individual or individuals and incorporated later in another way. They wouldn't have framed it as the latter in the original video when it was clearly not the case and although many people choose to do creative projects while freelancing, as soon as more than one person is working on a large project together it is legally the best option. to register as a corporation in Canada.

There are three types of business structures: sole proprietorship and corporation. A sole proprietorship is an unincorporated business owned by a single person, such as a graphic designer, a partnership is a joint relationship between two or more people working together in a business, but each person is personally responsible for profits and losses. The final option, the corporation, tends to be the best option for teams of more than one person because, among other reasons, it offers basically limited risk to the owners of the company. you are only subject to what you invest in the company rather than everything you own as an individual, so for many people who are self-employed or small businesses it makes more sense to incorporate for tax reasons, this is something I would say that he was still dishonest even with the new information, that's what's relevant to be honest.

I'll discuss why this distinction is important and how spills fall into these traps very soon, but the spills video is a good story for a channel's origins, however, for the most part. about Roland, with whom as a person I never had a problem. I'd rather have one channel as a spill than most, but that doesn't mean I can't handle some issues with their deals and how they represented those deals. Let's say that the information was not seen as relevant to you, but the fact is that it was not really a case of additional information that does not change the context of your channel at all.

The additional information here does change the context to be these. The smart creators that are Bill or Rowland knew how to integrate it into a mode of additional information that honestly wasn't the most relevant, you just forget that they even involved a different story in the first place, it's the polar opposite of going from Not Enough Information or Too Much information, but honestly, I'd rather have too much than missing because at least people with a critical eye can extract the information they need so you can see the spill and all of our other projects were done by ourselves and started.

From scratch there was a lot of experimentation before we got to where we are today, so at the end of this story I was quite confused by this comment because I'm sure they've generally discarded some of the more widespread ideas they were funded for. by YouTube that were on the more conspiratorial side and they personally did not convince me for reasons that I will explain later, but if you are going to delve into all the processes that led to the creation of the channel and that the company behind it suddenly says that it made from scratch guys, seems pretty defensive in a change of tone that hadn't really been earned before this video.

I totally considered that this was a situation that was a possibility and while I will defend them on some behalf, I also feel that they are trying to get out of some falsehoods and avoid being the center of a discussion that is quite important, what is that discussion? ? Well, let's go there now after thinking deeply about it. I really can't because of the fact that they admitted certain details because they didn't think it was relevant, we obviously have the real elephant in the room, which was the misleading notion of incorporation. I don't want to go into too much detail about that because I hope it's self-explanatory at this point. point where the contradiction comes, but also the framing of passion projects for two people, some people now, if what they are saying is true, the people working on this project certainly had an interest in the topic once again, which is not necessarily undermines all the points that are made against them, I would say that they certainly have more character than many of the corporate channels and to completely say that they are the same would be unreasonable, but I would also say that there is an element of corporate disorientation that permeates what What they do sometimes worries people about corporations is that, given their pre-existing status as a business, they can gain unfair advantages and probably genuine investment in what they are doing and therefore lead to takes that are not completely in good faith or that have not been partially done. and I'm going to go over all of these factors in this video, but I want to start by focusing on the basis of it, as Rolen explained above, it all started with one person and without outside help, we had no financial support at the time and we don't have any. financial support now and yes monetization affects us a lot, we earn enough to run the company and slowly grow the Spill universe, if you would consider spill channel made from scratch.

Personally, I don't know many YouTubers who start their channel at the back. of a business specifically committed to that channel with a salary that already supports them that is definitely the design of a company for many people they start making content because they are interested in a topic even with the personal interests of the people in the video pointed out the The story What this bill tells us is genuine: it is still about finding a channel in order to generate greater interest in the company. Obviously, they frame it very seriously talking about employee morale and I remember walking into the second side of the room and seeing everyone working.

Well, super, you know, I feel depressed like they were working on lifeless projects and I was like that was really unfair, what if they could also do something they like? And while I respect that, I feel like there's been a bit of sugar coating. In the reasons here particularly given in the previous video they had talked about Spillers if it was the main controlling factor which seems to be no longer true obviously taking into consideration the fact that other old pages were not the most successful at the time of Those Others channels aren't starting either and I'll get to that in a moment, but I feel like their story is still ingrained in the industry when we see that I can understand the concern and that the behavior hasn't exactly adopted the principle. approach the guy at the top of the odds, our good friend Roland Numeron seems to have a history of running this type of business.

He has multiple networking and speaking related businesses in the past and it's understandable why someone we know would want to include. your experience, although some have been more successful than others, but alas, that is corporate life, after all, I personally felt that whatever had happened, the current setup pretty much reflected corporate implications rather than business projects. two passionate people, in fact, in many ways they were behaving exactly like a corporation, what many of these companies do include or a good good brand is that they have a successful page or channel and then they start to extend that brand, which is something which they even cover in the video, in the case of good products, they would simply stay. a new suffix in the entry describes what topic they would cover good good food good good gifts good good dildos I don't know what they are doing in this universe of bills it's pretty much the same thing praising these new brands that are different but also the same style, the same approach, the same cross-promotion and even the same stage of personality because they let that hot drink brew and talk about the topic they just can't get enough of, there's something a little disturbing about it, to be honest, I noticed that.

It seems like Grill is slightly different in its approach, although I'm honestly not sure if I like it. Peach simile, please, your wheat boy may not have seen it, but certainly don't panic, Jeff, but your pants are on fire. I personally don't. I don't really see the appeal in giving me an idea of ​​what the roast content would be like if it were made by a Canadian; However, I'm sure, although I definitely don't like it on the hill, that it seems like the kind of thing the corporation would definitely do. Green light and production. My name is Jack and well, welcome I guess.

I've never made one of these before, but I'd like to make many more. You see, I want to be a content creator like my parents never wanted. They are not doing themselves any favors. I mean the voice acting. Hello fellow youtubers. I do YouTube. My parents don't want me to do YouTube. I'm defying my parents. I am definitely a character developed in three dimensions. Did I mention that I want to be a youtuber please help me please I also read the strong word of a spy. I know how all the characters look like pop vinyl. Pop vinyls are bad enough and emotionless as is, they're even less effective when you try to give them personalities that contrast with that emptiness.

On the one hand, I'm going off track, what I mean is that everything in its current form seems too corporate for my taste and I'll go into more detail about that in a moment, of course. That behavior may have developed from the people who work with the corporation and their experience has taught them how to develop such a network, but it still doesn't counteract the other points that have been raised and at best , they have done. They put out information to paint a misleading picture of their business, at worst they actually lied, but that's why we need to move on to the next questions: why would anyone care if they were a corporation?

Would anyone have cared if they were working for a company? corporation, if anyone would have cared, these are all interesting questions and I want to talk about all of them too. I'll show you a clip that was found in research for another video that isn't happening now, which is a huge shame, it's unfair. even considering T-series as a big youtuber and this has been a big problem on YouTube for so long, corporations and companies essentially taking over YouTube. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with companies being on YouTube, it's smart. YouTube is a huge platform, why?

I don't take advantage of its incredible reach, and as a TV show fan, I really like being able to rewatch interview sketches and performances after the show airs. That said, the growing presence of large corporations boosts independent creators, the people who made YouTube what it is. Nowadays this has become more and more stressful for independent creators because they can't keep up with YouTube, which is why we have seen more and more YouTubers leaving or taking a break, they are exhausted and that's not the only discouraging thing. , check out. Through the trending page, most of them are late night shows, companies and music videos, and highly noticed celebrities are also taking over the platform.

It's so clever that corporations know that we love celebrities and they make the stars seem more accessible to us by putting them on YouTube, but in reality there is a big production team behind it, so you can see that the T series has become one of the main YouTube channels. It's actually more symbolic of how YouTube has become more corporate-friendly, hurting independent creators who made it big. It's not difficult to be someone to have fun with. The irony of such a statement and I honestly feel that this is one of the key problems from the beginning, as it is said in principle, barring exceptional circumstances, no matter what foundations I found on this channel, it is the journey it has taken me.so far. today and I was hoping that people might judge me based on that, but if I were to do a story about my origins and I left out certain details that were important and it would paint a very different picture than what was actually the case, but I think people would have reason to feeling deceived or upset, however, goes further because when we create a channel often based on our own personality, we create a connection and as a principle as a In this case, a morality, I would expect people to create genuine information connections from of genuine beliefs.

There's a stigma around corporations now which we'll discuss in a moment, but I would have preferred Spill to make it clear what the image looked like the first time instead of being selective with the information they presented, especially their channel, which cared about present all posters as main, being direct with your audience about such information will result in statements about overall integrity, as they are underlined by the same principles, it is clear to me that spill were aware of the problems that presenting themselves as more could have brought. corporate than many assume, but that said, I can understand why they may have been hesitant to be forthcoming about that information;

However, people are persistent and whether you tell them or not, they will do it. They'll find out for themselves, so what are the problems? Obviously there has been an active reason why corporations are taking over YouTube and that has caused concern in many communities, in certain communities the craters have been completely expelled by the big machine with YouTube channels like Jimmy Kimmel. Live basically monopolizes the YouTube homepage and pushes out more independent creators whose content may be less wholesome or family friendly but no less quality in their content. Corporate Craters have great production values ​​and everything looks bright and nice and people can get distracted.

That, but ultimately it doesn't change the fact that these smaller Craters with more emphasis on actual comedy can be a lot funnier and provide the public with much more entertainment, we like to think that YouTube is a level playing field and, although that is far from the truth, it is when the craters are simply pushed unconditionally with no means to compete that people get frustrated, understandably, so that in its first video, at one point, the spill shows a list of videos that were demonetized in an attempt to show that they go through the same thing. Compared to other craters that do it but none of them are appealed, that led many to believe that they might have a separate deal with YouTube to promote them regardless of monetization, but I think that's a much simpler explanation.

I think corporations just don't do it. Think about your monetization status sometimes because corporations don't think about those things. If you've ever looked at some of the top news stories on YouTube, many videos won't have any ads, it's not because they can't be monetized for appeal, it's probably because they were never attracted to them, which sounds strange because it's a big monetary difference, but for Many of these channels is an advertising game that will ultimately generate the most genuine revenue in the long run; However, that is one of the biggest things that also bothers people. corporations can withstand deep monetization BSB have money and investments elsewhere with new corporate channels replacing independent creators, this gives them two reasons to implement strict additional monetization prerequisites because corporate channels could not survive that without leaving of being the face of the platform, this has generated a lot of controversy, particularly around certain topics that many feel should be open to independent commentary and yet those topics can be so frustrating if you don't have that monetization not only in money but also in views, which deters people. independent craters has been researched and shown that deep monetization has a negative effect on views and corporations are much more resistant to that system.

One of the genres that has been consistently affected is drag content. In fact, another creates Jake Beyonce and these Beyonce, but with Jake, it was completely demonetized and without the attention of the community, it would probably have remained monetized for people who perceived that corporations had as their main goal maximizing monetary income, unlike of the independent creator who just wants to express himself and, although it does not necessarily weigh, it is true and although it was obviously not done to the most efficient extent, as shown by my previous comments on our appeals, there are certain factors that often make this perspective a so much precise.

The problem is that we don't want to create their opinion based on the amount of money it can make them, we want to create this opinion that is based on what they really feel at that moment, whether that feeling is popular or unpopular, well supported or implausible when they publish videos that their hand even appealed to the feeling of hello fellow youtubers, it is disturbing now not to say that the spill indicates exactly the most popular option monetarily or even please, in fact, I would say that they appeal less to people's reactionary emotions That many other channels, however, if they are willing to bend the truth about some of these matters for the sake of their own reputation protection some may say well, why else would they be influenced?

And that's what happens with corporate involvement, vested interests, it's the same thing with politics, it's the same thing with mainstream media people. They're not saying what they really think and I understand why that bothers people. YouTube's corporate takeover isn't just about corporations competing with craters, it's about how sanitized these craters appear because they know they're appealing to YouTube's guidelines to win. One foot up while still trying to keep up the masquerade of creator-related stuff, this is what frustrates me because I like what Bill does in a lot of ways. I have no problem with them having ties to corporations because I know that one person could really not do what they are doing and they are filling a void that no one else has been prepared to fill, which is probably why they are doing so well.

However, they must be aware of the fact that they are in a community that values ​​being honest about those ties rather than not having them, even if those ties carry some stigma because it underlies a larger integral principle and that is something that is not worth it. betray not even for the dog, but let's talk about the dollar and the House bill being a little complicated. even spills as a channel is not working as well as it could and I know that sounds crazy to people because they have gained almost a million subscribers and about a year and after a year it had barely surpassed a thousand, but this is one of the Bigger issues about corporate channels being overlooked because it's not exactly relevant to the content but rather the people behind it and the socio-political environment around it.

I find it sad that a child has so many subscribers and views that he has the main creators of him. the people who claim to take credit for this production still in other jobs still claim to struggle to make a living from time to time, from the video Roland seems like a great charming guy and I'm going to assume he is for the sake of the video , but even with that noted, if you're making the money you can and wearing shirts, then you could offer your employees a lot more. We are a small group of people without much money or the most ideal installation space. or tools, but we care about the quality of the work we do and put all our effort into making sure every video is the best we've ever made, meaning a channel that's not working properly or a channel where we're too much. money is going to the top now, it could be the case that Spill's host, an artist, doesn't actually spend much time on the channel, but that's Beverly, not how they framed it and if they lie, they lie, but also They don't change the amount of wasted potential that's being produced here;

Not only are they behaving like a corporation in the way they create this network of channels, but they are behaving like a corporation in the idea that they are very far from the real sources of income. They only reference it when people start to doubt their credentials as creators and ultimately that's what gives me the opinion that Spill is quite a corporate company because I personally think that if it started out as an exciting product of two people with a genuine investment, well, I would have been much more familiar with the actual tech cops of YouTube and how to maximize income because when you're a struggling student, that kind of stuff matters to you, unless you're really complacent, which you don't.

I think they are, they're probably lovely. people too, but I must emphasize that you are missing out on a lot right now and you are definitely worth more than the payroll you are on right now because people value the voice of the channel, that's the other thing about corporations. just people placed here and there and generating income for the main person who owns this idea, but that main person may not necessarily be as familiar with the inner workings of YouTube channels, has no soul and can often be quite inefficient . Spill barely has anything. alternative social media presence their Twitter is a wasteland they have 6,000 followers for a channel of nine hundred and thirty thousand subscribers and their posts are basically restricted to video posts there is no further attempt to expand any personality their son does not have any linked social media account , I think they have many types of stickers, but it was a task to find them by looking at their videos.

I think they've only done a few sponsorships in the last six months for Skillshare and with a track that, considering output content and popularity, is surprisingly low, especially considering how tight/cheap they consider their latest monster ship ago. over three months and since then they have uploaded almost 30 videos, sponsorships for a channel that size could easily equal a month's salary, they may have their reasons, but it seems like a missed opportunity how people expect these people to stay in touch with YouTube when they can't even contact Rain Shadow Legends is beyond me. I understand why I may not get many sponsors, but I still get offers and Spill is much more advertiser friendly. and once again I emphasize that if this is a real personal venture from two passionate people who are committed to the YouTube community, and I am more than willing to accept it, you should know how great initiatives work by seeing them. in other crater videos and why it would be beneficial for you to get inspired at the end of the day.

One fact we know is that they are currently involved in corporate business at any time, regardless of the circumstances and whether they are applicant people and therefore should want to do so. not just for themselves, but for the people who work around them, these are not just independent individuals who receive one-time payments, maybe a company can afford it, but you know they love employees, right? You're creating a whole universe here, but don't do it. I've got some YouTube 101 basics when corporations don't work better for the people involved, it's not just a disservice to the communities they identify with, it's a disservice to everyone who works for them and wastes valuable opportunities to do more and I like it.

To think that the person associated with delivering that information and delivering those opinions could make a living off of that, especially when that's the appeal of the channel I take to have someone else own my means of production and that's just a general scruple as to why. I don't like many corporate channels because ultimately their core is so disconnected that even if their content is good, I wouldn't trust them based on credibility alone. Who is responsible when a story is incorrect? That's another big reason why people get angry. Transparency people want to hold the right person accountable, and that's especially important in a genre like commentary.

I think Spiller is an interesting chalice in many capacities. They definitely have more personality than the average corporate channel. I think that's what allowed them to pass without scrutiny as such. At the same time, I can long understand why this may be more threatening if companies can now pose as ordinary individuals who attract audiences previously out of reach while pandering to the selective algorithms of YouTube and get deep monetization in places that many other craters couldn't resist. I understand why people are worried that eventually all genres will be orchestrated in this corporate way and nothing thatsomeone sees will be remotely real.

That said, that's also the detail that has planted a seed of doubt in my mind about the control center of this channel because someone like Taylor Bark needs to understand the amount of control she has right now over her character because of that personality to working where she couldn't really belong to anyone else, she's a powerful position, whether she has control of the channel or not, I could be wrong, but she seems to be a pretty integral element to pointing out where in the modest service her origin story It made sense, it's just that the details didn't add up beyond that, which is why I feel it's important to move forward. carefully here because although there are clearly some disparities in their story and honestly happy they should have been more transparent about it, they may be happy with what they are doing and are quite interested because they haven't paid a visit to John Brolin and They seem to be on good terms, which gives me some faith in their content;

However, it is important to note that they are missing out on a lot of money that could probably help the people who work for them and even themselves. There seems to be this level of corporate commitment. disconnect in the way they behave and I'm sure you all could benefit from some re-evaluation of that and that's all I suggest, just take a look at it, however this is a problem much more resident in your actual channel and not exactly. What worries other creators who are competitors rather than employees? What threat do they represent in that sense? Well, let's summarize this in many ways recently.

YouTube has been ruining a law. They are independent creators who can't afford it. that's monetization, censorship, unnecessary termination, corporations can't afford it, but remember that even as they grow, they just sue YouTube at that point and they can get around it in many ways and we know those rules impact us more than them. I don't think spills are a problem because of YouTube themselves. I'm sure YouTube would give them a much easier deal than what they've supposedly been getting, and I honestly think a child spill would be a bit of an elaborate plan. I think it's just another company trying to get a piece of the pie, for better or worse, however, I don't think corporations can ever recreate the type of personality that an individual in front of the microphone can capture because it requires levels of consistency and understanding. of real communities that are out of touch.

Companies full of employees would have trouble engaging and the fact that Spill tried to spin their origin story that way originally is proof that they are not as in touch as they would like to present themselves and I think the audience identified that i Fortunately, I don't think corporations can completely replace individual craters because they don't have a monopoly on the means of production in many genres that many people have access to a semi-decent microphone or camera that allows them to create content, that It's a strange thing about spills, although they could be a concern because they reflect the greater access a corporate entity has to behave in a more humane way. that underlines its weakness if in the creation of a persona it often depends so much on an individual that the individual could then simply say "well, give me more control or I'm gone", it seems to be an important bargaining chip for channels that are more oriented to the person, therefore, of corporations.

They always have to be somewhat restrained in the relationships they create with their audience so that independent creators can work with corporations. They have to make sure that their ingredients are somehow replaceable because if the creation of that character comes from something unique to a person's environment on that channel. then that person could gain significantly more control in the actual corporation. There are many things that companies can change, but the person is difficult. The spill does great research and excellent content formulation. They have a lot of animations, but that is not what the public is looking for. because there's only ever going to be an appeal to people with a little more sass, a little more personality, a little more edge and YouTube can pour all the algorithmic chains in to provide that kind of content and edge.

Have I compared choice behaviors to metaphor? to lead a horse to water, they can put a lot of mediocre, family-friendly mainstream content on people's homepages, but that won't satisfy some of all the loopers on the bright side of the WatchMojo hall of truth, there will be a mr. beast on idubbbz and I hate everything so I want to represent that more organic view of YouTube. I wouldn't say they are all a tour de force of personality in what they do, but the connections they create with their audiences are much more direct. and genuine and the public recognizes that I think in many ways that is what people come to YouTube, because YouTube could take away all means of support from us and I think we would find a way to persevere and, although we must always fight for fair treatment, we should have some.

Confident in our own self-sufficiency, let us conclude this story ban. I think it's pretty clear that Spill wasn't completely honest with how they were originally presented, and I understand why they wanted to downplay certain elements of their story. You know, the corporation is. a word with a lot of negative connotations within the YouTube community, but all the video did was show that they were out of touch with what the community wanted, the way they used certain common struggles of creators as ways to improve those credentials I felt at this level and I think if they had provided a little more context to their story, people would have been okay with that.

Instead, it seemed like an attempt to cover up those links which led to more anxiety within the community and people wondering what ulterior motives they had for hiding it. I feel like it was just a clumsy attempt to retain an image they may not have earned, although I understand that given the recent situation regarding YouTube's treatment of craters, people may be a little more nervous and, as noted , it is clear to me that the spill is not They can appear as masked for the game as the youtubers and are quite clumsy in certain aspects of management, which can have negative effects on their own, it is completely viable for criticism;

However, taking into account my previous points, I would also like to say that he could be running a good business fattening the voice channel Taylor seems to be happily working on the project despite having great bargaining power over the brand tells me that such Maybe they are just doing something good for themselves and those around them, however I also emphasized that they currently seem to be a bit out of touch and probably missing out on a lot of potential income. Everyone can do better and if you need any ideas my DMS is open as to the effects on the community spill, they clearly have a way of positively confusing the discussion and I really think it's good to have someone who uses quotes and does research maximum effect and there have been a couple of cases in the past where it spilled out that they interacted positively with community members, but recently the people who have been criticizing them for this escapade have been framed in a more antagonistic manner by certain followers of spills, people have been responsible for stockpiling them and claiming that these critics are just upset because they aren't that good or successful and I don't think that's what it's about.

As stated in this video, I think it's the fact that people feel like their careers are threatened by this empty shell and they don't have the resources to stay in that capacity and that just gives them two more powers to implement harder changes. that they don't affect these large conglomerates and create this completely sanitized website is a worrying thought at the same time, I don't think the spill belongs to those specific intentions, although I think it would be great if they were a little more involved in the community. The alienation has created some disconnection between them and other craters, which has probably led to this situation and we don't want that.

I don't think the audience demand for other people in the community will diminish and I'm hopeful that YouTube can to recognize the contribution that independent craters make and the number of viewers they attract, I think it's a principle of YouTube that in trying to remove them, they wouldn't want to take that risk in my opinion and I don't think there is any way to plant corporations in the place of the individual crater , although they have treated many people harshly lately, but that will also be a topic for another time for now. Keep creating the content you love and try to be honest about who.

You guys don't care much as long as you didn't spit out any documents, so yeah, that was the video. I hope you enjoyed it. My side battery is almost dead and I left the charger up so I need to get this over with. as quickly as possible i want to congratulate my editors who have done a fantastic job please go and check them out they are beautiful people and i also want to congratulate my $10 patreon on screen right now $50 patreon some fuss spectrum angel rocket rau Sara Elizabeth Caroline thank you so much and my hundred dollar sponsors Brandon Adam Michael and Christopher love me and mean a lot to me you know you guys are fantastic please keep up the great work if you want to contact me on social media twitter on piñon face of rice with the correct facial.

I really need to check my DM which actually I probably haven't done that in a long time and discord in the pinned comment you can find all the links there which I don't think I have much more than ants. I hope you know we'll have a good time when this video comes out. I guess we'll see, but until then take care of my friends on the right sprocket and see you around. In the next