We’ve Been Writing Twist Villains WRONG

If you really want to ruin your movie, include a Twist villain and I think I finally know why it's because they all suck, like Pixars is fine, they usually seem to know what they're doing but like Disney, they're just all thrown away. Whether you want it or not to make the kids think the movie is super smart, but the kids' opinions are meaningless because they're all idiots and you and I, hopefully, aren't, and now the movies are worse than if they were They will simply interpret it correctly, but what is the difference? between Pixar and Disney

villains

what makes a Twist villain good versus bad what mistakes are made here so we can know when to avoid them that's exactly what I hope I've discovered after some analysis.

I boiled things down to seven pretty basic things that make a good villain turn, and while having all seven isn't strictly necessary and most don't have less than 405, it does lead to an exponentially worse turn and character, so today we'll discuss three. Pixar

villains

and three Disney villains and we will go over each of them. of those seven points to see once and for all what makes a Twist villain insert a synonym for bad here or insert a synonym for good here is just code for me that I didn't actually write any synonyms in my script in the Alien If you needed more proof that Mr Water News is the best animated villain of all time, look no further than the fact that he's the only villain of the six we're making that gets a seven-point check, but, Of course, he is still learning with the points.

Let's go over point one: a solid motivation if your villain doesn't have a good reason for doing what he's doing, they just become a joke, but throughout the movie we keep hearing about how Monsters Incorporated is about to collapse because Los Kids aren't as scared as they used to be, so when you discover this new, more productive way to get energy from kids, of course you'd choose to do point two. He's not evil just for the sake of being evil. He is kind. of a subcategory of motivation, but I really need to specify that it doesn't really count if a villain is just being evil because it's fun, obviously a villain who enjoys being evil in addition to a solid motivation can work too, but villains like it.

Mr. Watunus, I feel like they are better in most situations, they might calculate that nature makes them seem more of a threat than someone who kills puppies in their free time just because, like Mr. Water News, he didn't want to banish Mike and Sully, that was it. just a means to an end because they accidentally discovered the scream extractor because of you I had to banish my scared top and with this machine we won't need scares plus he got what he deserved Sullivan was twice as scary as you'll ever be element three a cool reveal or at least a not terrible revelation.

I don't really think it's necessary to say anything about this, plus I don't know how I would describe it so let me play the scene, the reveal is what people remember when they think of a Twist villain, so you want to make sure it leaves a impact and he showed us this here, along with point four, the fact that he doesn't monologue about his plan for several minutes even though that only makes things worse for him. It makes everything better as we can tell that he is involved in the plot with Vandal and even if we didn't, Mike explains it to us in addition to that scene we already saw where Mr Water News and Randall are literally talking about the evil plan .

Think about how much worse it would have

been

if Mr. Watanus had tied Mike and Sully to chairs and explained the already obvious plot, kicked them out the door and now that all the suspense is over and said that now all that's left is to kill Elsa and bring her back. summer, oh wait, I'm getting ahead of myself Point how they did it, then there's point five, the fact that there's already a villain, obviously some movies, I mean murder mysteries, will have a villain Twist and you know he comes in, so you're trying to figure it out the whole time because it's literally the point of the movie, it's a murder mystery and two of the three Disney movies we're going to see actually try and fail to do that same thing, but with Monsters Inc we already have a villain , Randall. so we are not trying to find out who is behind the suspicious plot because it is clearly obvious who is behind the suspicious plot, at least we think that adding mysterious water news on top of that was just an unexpected surprise and yet completely sensible e inevitable, which leads nicely to point 6, subtlety and I don't think I can say this subtlety subtle enough, it has to be subtle but it also has to be there, so Michael showed the director of the good place, among other things, he said that the key to a good thing is that it is surprising and at the same time inevitable;

In other words, you don't want to find out too soon, but you want it to seem really obvious. Sanui Watch, which is another reason why having an existing villain is so useful. the clues we need to see that he's a villain, and that's why when you rewatch the movie knowing the

twist

, a lot of things he says have a double meaning, but they're subtle enough that you won't realize it the first time. . inevitable surprise and point 7, the fact that he has more than 15 minutes to be a villain again, this is pretty self explanatory if you're going through the hassle of a Twist villain being given time to be a villain. of only one

twist

if they are revealed to be a villain and then immediately defeated, that's a bit boring, but if you have 10 to 20 minutes of escalating action between the reveal and the climax, another villain actually has some time to establish himself as a threat and Mr Water News has that time and it is indeed a threat, so that's the gist of it in almost every way.

Mr Water News manages to be a new villain with a perfect twist, but before him we had Stinky Pete. Stinky Pete is the villain with a twist in Toy Story 2. And while he doesn't have the coveted seven out of seven, he's still a pretty good villain, but I don't have much to say about him, so let's go over the points again. The first point was motivation and his motivation. who wants to go to Tokyo, makes it clear that he wants to go to Tokyo and that he just wants to be liked by the children to have a sense of purpose, which can be achieved if you guessed that going to Tokyo, point two is not being Evil by the just being evil, he just wants to go to Tokyo, point 3, the reveal that isn't as strong as Mr.

Water Noose, but at least he doesn't say anything really stupid, at least there's still a bit of shock factor. there, since he's never stepped outside of his box before and for him to be well outside of his box is a bit. Yes, shocking, point four, the monologue, he monologues a little bit, however, there is a big difference: it's not to brag about his genius, it's to get Woody. going with him to Tokyo because then he'll be a more valuable part of the whole set or whatever, it's a real part of his plan instead of being stupid and ruining every five element.

The fact that there's already a villain, I guess Al already is. a villain but I was thinking more about Woody's little conflict of whether or not a child's love is more important than the general recognition of many children obviously not a traditional villain but the Toy Story movies don't really need traditional villains in the Stories are simply driven by the characters making toys, being loved and making related decisions, which is why I don't like Toy Story 4, but that's beside the point, just like with Mr Water News, you're not really looking for a villain of Twist because you think the story is ending, although that's a bit of a problem that we'll get to in a minute, but the first point six is ​​the subtlety that we see throughout the movie, how important it is for Pete to go to Tokyo , but it's never the main point of the plot and the audience's attention is never drawn to it more than necessary, besides the fact that it never came out of its box and how someone essentially trapped in an exhibit could do something harmful .

We just didn't realize that his desire to go to Tokyo outweighed his desire to stay. Overall, the Box is pretty well executed, point 7, however, is a bit weaker, while Stinky Pete is revealed before the film's literal climax, which isn't saying much because it's basically the bare minimum, since Mr Water News was revealed about 10 minutes earlier. Pete was and maybe that's why he generally liked Mr Water news more, maybe that's why people don't immediately think of Stinky Pete when someone says Pixar villain, but I mean he's still a six out of seven, which it's like a b to the B plus I.

I think I've already proven my point that Pixar understands the basic formula, but you know what I said, three and we've made two, and the math suggests there's more to do if I asked you to you chose a Pixar villain and Mr. Water. news is already sold out as an option, who would you probably choose the right syndrome? And yes, I tend to agree that he's probably second best, but he's in a class by himself and while he has a lot of stage presence, that's not that important. He's a specific twisted villain thing and more of an evil person in general, which is kind of cool, so let's talk about De La Cruz for those of you who say Ernesto De La Cruz is a bad villain.

I don't really understand them although I think we can all agree. That water annoyance syndrome or the two best villains. I can say with almost absolute confidence that Ernesto was probably the third. The reason for his evil is like a real reason and we even get to see the results of his actions, which is something that most Twist villains never get the chance to do. Most Twist villains are defeated before they can represent the Clan, but Dela Cruz is different, his crimes are far in his past and he has

been

living happily ever since. I mean, we'll still go through the elements because that's the point of the video, but I hope I've made my point already. element one, the motivation is very obvious, he wanted to be famous and he realized that Héctor's songs were good enough to get him that fame. element two, it's not being bad for him by being evil, but unlike the other villains we've mentioned, he's actually aware that what he had done is so bad, but he wasn't doing it just to wreak havoc and become emperor of the first Galactic Empire, he wanted to be remembered and since then.

That's the whole thing with Land of the Dead: the audience sees where he's coming from, was willing to do whatever it took to seize his moment, and actually offers a little commentary on whether bad things are worth doing. being remembered especially if you do those things when no one looks good, well, not cool, you know what I mean, point three, the reveal. I have a little more to say about this one, so there are two types of revelations, they are those where in a split second, your entire understanding of reality completely falls apart and all the pieces fall into place with a few moments. few lines of dialogue, so obviously Mr Water News would be an example that in good places there is also a second type of revelation and that is slow realization and, in fact, this slow realization is divided into two subcategories and, Depending on how well you saw the twist, any of them could apply to you.

The first is what you already know and that is dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is when you already know the Twist and they're just waiting for it to happen to the characters, you know something they don't know, probably the best way this has been described is, of course, for example, if I said I can't wait to eat the salmon cracker, but there were people. around that he knew the almond cookie was poisoned, that would be dramatic irony, so he picks it up in Charles' months as if he's the guy who's trying to kill the bird and the bird is one of the main characters in this point, so he's the bad guy, easy, but it's Carl's Idol and Russell is an idiot because he's a kid and that's why they're not going to suspect anything, we're just waiting for them to suspect, which still keeps the tension going because the characters still are in danger and the second subcategory is when I don't know, you start to question things as you slowly realize, wait a minute, something's not right here and then that eventually builds and builds until you finally see what is. happening, you're like, oh my god, that's crazy, until I like sixth sense spoilers, I guess. but he was dead the whole time, but he did it very subtly and it's incredibly hard to realize the first time and I don't know anyone that made you start thinking about the rest of the movie and you're like, oh.

Oh my god, no one has really talked to him except the guy who can see dead people and is really good, but what did I mean when I said any of these could apply to you? Well, honestly, that's it, or you thought he was the villain. it was perfectly obvious, so you can see all the foreshadowing and watch the character slowly figure it out or you figure it out with the characters with that buildup.slow and satisfying. Either way, the villain is shocking to the characters and if he is shocking to you too. cool, but if he's not, that's cool too and that's just the beauty of really caring and trying to be a good villain anyway point four, the monologue thing, now some people are going to say he doesn't deserve this point because his monologue does not.

Reveal too much of your plan to just the main character, why not just have him reveal his intentions to literally everyone? It would be very strange if someone tried to defend them, okay, so listen, this is what it was actually Miguel who listed everything. his crimes and Dela Cruz himself wasn't really bragging too much, isn't he, he said yes, I was the one who killed him, I was the one who did this, I won and you lost lol, no, if anything, he was just defending his actions, he didn't outright deny it, but why would he? It's not like he expects to be caught on camera and revealed to the entire world as a relic of the 2000s.

I don't care, the more you think about it, the more you realize that technically he understands this point, however, he doesn't understand the Point for point five. I'm a reasonable guy. The fact that there's already a villain like there isn't one, obviously, if you read it during the 20 seconds where Miguel is about to go home, you'll realize that the story can. We're possibly not done since there's like 40 minutes left, but again it's dramatic irony and to some extent it doesn't matter if we know because even if we know it's not over, Miguel thinks that, but he still doesn't get the point. there's just no other villain and you'd have to work too hard on the facts to make the logic work on point six, subtlety, you don't need me to explain what subtlety is again, so I'm going to throw up. some examples, the fact that the attacker is missing his face and it probably wouldn't occur to you until much later that maybe the guitar belonged to someone else, so there's this scene, the greatest musician of all time, oh what funny, bigger eyebrows. of all time perhaps, but his music and this one is not so important, but the gold tooth on the guitar because Héctor has a gold tooth.

I think that's an interesting point is that they threw it in your face, but you can catch it in re- look and see how cool and inevitable the surprise really was, yeah, look what I did there and then point seven, yeah, it revealed before the climax of the film, the song theft reveal happens at about 40 minutes left, the poison reveal happens at 38 minutes left, and Miguel is scrambled a bit before there are 36 minutes left and there's still time to the reconciliation of the entire character and all that before the climax, so there is enough time to be an epic villain, just as Stinky Pete De La Cruz gets six out of seven great jobs. well done, I think you probably understand by now, at least if you didn't before, that Pixar knows how to make twisted villains work.

Good job Pixar, now let's go over the criteria again, but with Disney movies, I'm going to ask first. You subscribe because I mean it can't hurt so subscribe to Frozen Big Hero 6 and Zootopia. I like all three of these movies, but sadly, tragically, even each of them has a very disappointing villain turn starting with the main man, Hans, so let's just get into point one: Motivation: He wants power because his brothers bullied him. and they pretended he was invisible when he grew up. I guess you could argue that his need for people to kowtow to him is a very weak parallel to Stinky Pete's need to feel loved by going to Tokyo if that's what you're doing with your English major.

I'm not going to question it, but you know, remember how I made that comparison with Palpatine and how good villains aren't evil just for the sake of being evil. evil only to become emperor of the first Galactic Empire Hans is literally willing to put Lenny through a distraught innocent woman with a sword and then let his sister die of Kodiak-like hypothermia just to be in charge of a city 19th century Scandinavian state for about 10 years until someone uses their power because they want power is lame, whether or not you believe his silly backstory is tragic. He's not doing any of this out of love or appreciation like Stinky Pete.

Stinky Pete wants to be admired by children. Hans doesn't want the love he wants. power just because now wait, does he understand this point, point two, being evil for the sake of being evil, which I just talked about, so yeah, he doesn't understand this point either, point three, the revelation, this revelation is infamous if only there was someone? Out there those who loved you didn't actually imply that they were evil, something we'll get to in a minute, oh yeah we will, but it's definitely shocking no matter the reason, so I guess he can understand this point because I like the hair. bad enough in other ways that this point doesn't make sense in the grand scheme of things point four the monologue doesn't make sense at all if I could take points off I wouldn't I can't but if I could I would Hans could have just left I closed the door and closed it like that, but instead he felt obligated to follow his entire plan to honor the people he was trying to fool in the middle of the Castle, even though the veil itself feels pretentious and even though I guess Still, it's a generally acceptable reveal, which is why I ended up giving them the point, there was literally nothing stopping him from saying, "Oh wait, I'll be right back, I forgot my phone or whatever the equivalent of that is in this period of time and then you just leave or you just don't do it." I don't say anything, what is he going to do?

He limps after you. Hey, where are you going? Oh, and then he fell and that's it, you can go. Why would you tell the princess that you're going to murder the queen, aka her sister, when it's already established? for you that reason is considered very bad point five the fact that there is already a villain similar to Toy Story 2 the villain was less of a person and more of a concept the introduction of the villain was the relationship between the two sisters so Hans is a villain like Well, who pulled off his surprise? This is the inclusion, it complements the story in some way, not particularly, but do you get the point technically?

Yes, I want you to realize that it could be unreasonable or biased in the information because this work would not make sense, so point six. subtlety, okay, so I guess you could say this movie was very subtle about Hans being a villain, but I think of it less as subtlety and more as not implying anything at all. You see, not being too obvious is only half of being subtle. the other half features clues to be subtle about why this movie just forgets to watch this he's smiling if he really was a bad guy since no one was watching he wouldn't have smiled so the reveal was surprising but more like a post on our unexpected bar is kind of a random comparison, but you get what I'm saying, you can say oh, I didn't see that coming, but no, you can't base a cohesive conflict on that, you don't see it coming because no human being in sane mind I was looking for him because there was not even a slight hint that there was anything suspicious about him.

Remember I said a Twist is supposed to be an inevitable surprise. It was a surprise for sure, but it was by no means inevitable. Ironically, with the next two Disney villains they make the exact same mistake by not having clues set up, but they accidentally ended up being so confident in it that they made it inevitable but not a surprise at the same time, so that's interesting and point 7 it's the reveal moment between the reveal and the credits 17 minutes normally you'd earn at least that much between the reveal and the climax, but oh no, with this movie apparently being enough to sum it all up, I mean, you could give it a point if you want . but I really don't think so, what is your total score?

One of seven, but I gave him the revelation. Point like 3D, so two out of seven. You could argue that it's three out of seven, but even if you did, that's still really bad. like a whopping 29 following standard rating conventions, that's maybe an i i plus a pretty big step down from Pixar, eh, well fear not, because we still have two more of these to make us Big Hero 6 foreigners for the first time for this video and I really liked it. I was expecting the worst movie I have ever seen in my life. This movie is actually one of the best movies I've ever seen in my life and I know it's very controversial, but I'm serious.

I actually really like this movie, but of course I do. one complaint and as expected it's professor callahan as the twisted villain now he's actually incredibly interesting and this also carries over to zootopia because disney ruined them both in a very particular way so professor callahan first They made him really stupid like he didn't think it through. any of his revenge plan and not even if it was necessary because that's another thing he didn't think about, but just the basics of how to do it, you could argue that he's being irrational because he's so angry, oh he's so angry, so he can't think about that, you can't make that argument at all, it's extremely unlikely that his anger hasn't calmed down at least a little, even once after an unspecified period of time, which is probably several years, at less, I want to say this.

The guy is calmly standing here, that doesn't seem very vindictive, it just doesn't make any sense as we move on to points we haven't even started yet, you'll see exactly what I mean, the motivation of element one, so Callahan lays it out. a fire as an excuse to steal these micro robots that Hiro made so he could kill the guy responsible for his daughter's death because he was the one who opened the portal that his daughter went through and was stranded on the other side, so he left. Through all the trouble of reopening that portal just so it could eat the guy's building, he never once wondered if his daughter was still alive on the other side of that portal he spent all that time reopening, he just wants all the hard work. work of this type. be swallowed by DOI Mamu with some sort of poetic justice, and Callahan makes it perfectly clear that she doesn't care about confirming whether his daughter is dead.

Is this what Abigail would have wanted? Abigail is gone, so long story short, she refused to kill this guy. and he just sat patiently for presumably many years without a single thought in Revenge, then it turns out that Hiro makes these microbots and then I guess Callahan realizes that he can use them to ruin this guy's life in the most over-the-top way. The most ridiculous and superior way possible to go out of your way to reopen the portal your daughter went through only to not even care if she's still alive and then not even carry on when all these other innocent people are dying, it sure sounds horrible when they die innocent people.

The chase sounds like something you'd care about, you dumb piece of trash, so it turns out Tadashi, that's how he gets even worse. Hiro and Callaghan's brother may have advised the student to enter the building to save him and he died, but instead felt remorse for Tadashi's death. like an intelligent human being or even just a human being, he doubled down and insists that innocent people needed Nay to have to die to justify the death of his innocent daughter even though they didn't have to die before and he basically just became nice . old to homicidal terrorists in the span of about an hour after being completely cool about the whole thing for years.

I'm repeating myself on this point and we should probably move on to the next point, but like I was so stupid instead of you I had to banish my top scared, we arrived, we're there to save you, that was your mistake, there's no way I understand this point, point two, being evil for the sake of being evil, this one is a little technical because even though he has a motivation that makes absolutely no sense and then it's just perfectly fine to let civilians die, which seems pretty evil, but he doesn't. for power just for the sake of being evil, like he has a motivation that technically isn't power, so you can take this point, element three, the revelation, it's just a revelation, it turns around and that's it, it's not ridiculously absurd and It's not right, it just turns around, it just turns around and someone who is a different person than what you thought the person was.

There's a lot of fun stuff after the reveal, that was his mistake, but the reveal itself is just your typical mystery of Moto unmasking Mr. Jones. I don't think so, we thought he was the first thing, but he was actually the second thing from the beginning, wow he can hold up! Who cares, I mean the reveal itself was fine, point four, the monologue again, he says a lot of stupid crap after the reveal, that was his mistake, none of that was really a monologue, it's not like Hiro and the gang were tied to a metal post.

Hanging over a vat of acid is Callahan walking around smugly andexplains exactly how he's going to kill some random guy that no one cares about except him. He really doesn't reveal anything and isn't even really in power. They took his mask off and then Baymax punched him, he was defending his actions but like with De La Cruz just because he didn't want a kid to talk down to him and he left the server on a vlog as soon as he could so yeah understand this point. Also point five, the fact that there's already a villain there, it's not just like Zootopia, it's a modern mystery, this is just a superhero murder mystery, the goal of the first two-thirds of the movie is to unmask this one.

Dude, we have a lot of time to wonder. about who he is because the movie Duets all our attention on finding out who doesn't make sense to you point six subtlety he doesn't understand this point either I say it from the beginning there is literally a scene where Fred gathers everyone together and says that the villain is obviously this guy. I didn't see this as a kid like I said but even as a kid I'm pretty sure I could tell that this isn't how movies work and that someone else or something else was going on and if it wasn't this guy who basically didn't get any screen time, why not the guy who hates that guy who got considerably more screen time?

Everyone likes it that way, technically there are no clues, so you'd think it would be too. It's hard to notice, but then they accidentally made it too obvious again, it's the same as Zootopia, which we'll see, it was going to be a surprise but not inevitable, but then they got 2A again and were so confident in their genius, but accidentally simultaneously made it inevitable but not a surprise, so I'm revoking this point and point seven, the timing of its reveal now, for one, was like 40 minutes before the end of the movie on Disney plus, which is why I saw this on on the other hand, there are 16 minutes of credits, which is ridiculous, so he only has 20 minutes to be evil, but on the other hand, where did you get that hand?

There was still time for all the emotional reconciliation sticks and Bellwether was not. obtain, but what matters less is the time and more what you do with it so that he can also obtain this point and that is four points out of seven, 57 percent that are close to passing and are above half. I mean, obviously, it's not a good twist. villain and the only thing he gets

wrong

is extremely horrible, but this shows that Disney had some good ideas when it came to Callahan. The truth is that they presented it in a pretty decent way. The real only got that one thing

wrong

.

If Disney had thought a little more about his motivations and not said that was his mistake, most of it would have been fixed. The fact that we could draw that conclusion using only our seven points is probably a good idea. side, but you know what's not good, nice, nice transition here, assistant Mary Bellwether, it's so baffling how an otherwise really good movie managed to so brilliantly ruin this character, which again shows how Disney has no idea what they are. making Bellwether is a joke in literally every way, let's get to these points so I never have to talk about this sheep again until every rated animated movie episode, which may or may not happen because I'll probably be dead by then.

Coming to point one, motivation, this is the flimsiest excuse for your motivation, since Callahan didn't think about his at all, but at least he had a reason to be mad at the guy, since the guy in question made a mistake. really stupid. Bellwether woke up one day and thought, hey, you know what society is peaceful where predators don't actually hate their prey and there's no problem? Let's make it a problem, now we can get rid of all the predators you know, just in case. Hill logic. It's literally oh, we're the majority and they're the minority, so let's kill the minority.

Ninety percent of the population in Zootopia is prey, why not make it a hundred? She actually went every day. I wake up and wish you were dead, but. the Predators didn't even do anything, so she's basically saying: look at this minority, this minority is wild, this minority is dangerous and we have to kill this minority or at least imprison them. I'm going to leave it. I'm going to leave it. that sinks for a minute she says the dam will be united against a common enemy but they did nothing I mean I guess it works a lot maybe too much for the anti-racism message I mean there's no denying that the parallel is very close, but it doesn't make him a good villain.

You can't commit genocide just in case, so no, of course, she doesn't understand this point. Point two, is she being evil just for the sake of being evil, literally? Yes like me. she said that the problem she is trying to stop is just a problem that occurred to her, she turned it into a problem as if with her own mouth she admitted to setting up the problem just so that it wouldn't become a problem in the future, even though It was never going to be like this. become a problem in the future it still doesn't make sense point three the reveal and the element for the monologue let's do them at the same time this is the only reveal I think is really boring let me play it and get them that's it but I guess there's nothing to it bad, it's the monologue that's complicated now, just like with De La Cruz, they catch her with a recording, although I guess the police were already there, but you know, what's the difference?

De La Cruz does not hunt Miguel. while she explains exactly why she killed her best friend and took his songs, she doesn't pace around while mocking the main characters, she doesn't openly admit to the crime, you know what Bellwether does, she explains exactly why she thought of the crime. There are 90 of the population united against a common enemy, fourth while she mocks the main characters of the county, since the prisoners are simply biologically predisposed to be savages and she openly admits that she committed the crime. Fear always works and I will release all the predators in Zootopia to keep them. like this at 4:55 a.m. m.

On January 1 he looked up how long it takes before a body starts to smell at 4:58 a.m. m. how to stop the decomposition of a body. I mean, she definitely doesn't get the point of the monologue, but I guess she can take the original Point, since while it's the least memorable part of her character, it's also the only thing that doesn't actively ruin point 5. The fact that she already There is a villain, since this, like Big Hero 6, is a murder mystery, there really isn't another one. villain then, what most murder mysteries do and certainly what Big Hero 6 did, albeit poorly, is set up a red herring, Big Hero 6 simply did it with very little subtlety, the key to making a good red herring is to establish it without saying it, to spend the The public likes to work for their food.

It's a TED talk that I think everyone has been recommended to. At some point, the audience thinks they're being clever, so they think they're late and don't realize it's someone else the writers want. You think they don't want you to think about it, so you think you're being smart and you think you figured it out and you stop thinking about it, but actually you're thinking what they wanted you to think all the time and you've fallen right into their trap, but here they do something even more peculiar, they don't establish anything like halfway through the movie the mayor is arrested, but it wasn't even really mentioned in the context of the case and like I just said right now.

At this point there's still like half the movie left so it's obviously not him, so not only is the search for the villain front and center thanks to the murder mystery style, they don't even use a red heron to distract to the search audience by doing them I think they already figured it out and point 6, the subtlety is accidentally ruined with this Mayo thing, think about it, you were trying to think of someone it could be and you are presented with this probably very probably false notion that the mayor was behind this. everything and now you're wondering, well, if he's not the Predator government guy, why isn't he the government guy or girl?

And since it matches the whole somewhat slapdash message about racism, it makes a lot of sense and then you've figured it out. At least that's how I solved it and I was a stupid kid when this came out so you'd think it's inevitable but it's not a surprise, true it is but only accidentally, just like Big Hero 6 in the movie, almost There are no clues to this. even sheep will appear again after that scene in the security room it's just that in Disney's attempts to make their movie less predictable they did it so badly that they made it more predictable and I think Big Hero 6 did it worse but it's the same thing general problem, so Bellwether neither gets any of these points nor does it get the last point.

Let's think she has time to really be a villain. No Callahan was bad enough. Hans was bad enough, but Bellwether is revealed to be a villain and is caught. by the police in exactly the same scene, I counted the seconds that are less than four minutes, even Hans waited to be captured until a different scene, so the leader's final score is 1, one of seven or fourteen percent and the What he got was revelation. and I was being nice to that one like that was 50 50 anyway I gave it to her because she didn't actively screw it up you could argue for zero out of seven zero percent nothing correct at all, but with all this being said: I think Zootopia is a really good movie.

In fact, I like it a lot. The main characters are good. The city is really great. He has single-handedly revitalized the fairy community. Its message about racism is good at its core despite raising some uncomfortable questions about it. If people of color are supposed to be the prey or the predator in this analogy, even though Bellwether's tone is the very idea of ​​a Twist villain like Hans and Callahan did, that doesn't mean this movie is bad , Nora, Frozen or Big Hero 6. they all could be better and I hope you learned something along the way thanks to this video, but yeah, those are the rules, you can probably poke holes in them and you can disagree with me on any of my opinions, so they are opinions and not facts, but you know, I thought about this for a while and I think that if it's not an exact science, it is somewhat accurate, so feel free to use them if you ever want or have the need, luckily Disney .

They seem to have gotten over this in the last few years, and while I can't say that what they're doing now is objectively better, at least this way I can make another video once this new thing gets going, if it hasn't already, so i guess. I'm supposed to tell you to subscribe and like the video here, but instead I'm just going to do it abroad.