Starvation and the Wicked Globalists

This winter, tens of millions of British citizens, including children, will be dragged or thrown into energy poverty severe enough to risk permanent damage to their health. Cold, damp homes are the perfect breeding ground for mold which not only causes respiratory distress but makes homes essentially uninhabitable once established. a leftist newspaper published the story describing the danger, but without saying a word about why this crisis has arisen because the woke moralizers of the environmental movement helped create it compassion incompetent politicians inexperienced and self-aggrandizing there are lackeys famous Machiavellian journalists have increasingly insisted on loud voice Over the past five decades, that no cost was and is too great for others to bear in the pursuit of blind service to the planet, it is irresistibly tempting at this moment for those on that train to point out and demonize Vladimir Putin for Europe's energy problems, but their current machinations were completely enabled by the green ideologues that anyone with eyes could see a decade ago that idiot insisting that Europe depend on Russia for its energy security made the current situation inevitable, remember when President Donald Trump, the Number One populist threat, was branded and ridiculed by the intellectual and political elite in Europe and North America for preaching precisely that warning.

Well, now the chickens have truly come home, but still very little has been learned, consequently the virtue signaling of utopians committed to globalization claims that we are destroying the planet with cheap technology. energy, but are they truly and deeply committed to the environmental sustainability so strongly and insistently demanded or have they simply engaged in the prototypically Marxist way of taking revenge on capitalism? Despite its optimal carbon footprint, why would they demonize the exceptionally clean natural gas whose production thanks to fracking has allowed the United States to drastically reduce the carbon output that is so hypothetically undesirable?

Utility bills have soared in the UK, birthplace of the Industrial Revolution that lifted the world out of poverty now up to half of small businesses in Britain face the risk of bankruptcy and closure the government has had to announce a ruinously expensive energy price guarantee to mitigate the worst effects of this disaster the rush to renewable energy The mentality among extremist environmentalists is this: if we have to condemn the poor to destroy the system that made the rich, well I mean, you can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs. Here are some facts to remember. Well, we rush so madly and ineffectively towards renewable energy.

The International Energy Agency recently indicated that two decades of intense support for such initiatives have increased the share of energy provided by such means from 13 to 14 percent to an absolutely disappointing 15.7 percent. If all governments stick to their current climate policies, the world will get nothing. more than 28 percent of its energy that way by 2050. and one hundred percent by 2207, not 20 30 or 2035, but 200 years later, does anyone on the liberal left accept such projections or are they a mere figment of the imagination conspiratorial right-wing conservative? How about the Biden Administration? Biden's experts, no doubt motivated to be as optimistic as possible, project that only 27 percent of the energy produced by 2050 will be carbon dioxide-free and that full CO2 eradication may not occur until 2242 42, a guess.

Even more depressing if you consider such realities as grim then those presented by the International Energy Agency, but the tyrannical crisis and emergency justified by panic is not only happening in the United Kingdom, in Spain officials now dictate that commercial properties They must not be heated above 17 degrees Celsius or cooled below 27 degrees Celsius under penalty of law. Similar punishments are being considered in Switzerland as part of a proposed four-step plan to address the gas shortage, which This winter cannot be ruled out, given the geopolitical situation, the citizens of Germany are also now in the second phase of a three-stage emergency plan following the reduction of the flow of gas from Russia, its main supplier, the plan consists of bringing coal-fired plants to the market, according to German Minister Robert Habeck, even though they are simply poisoned for the climate and the potential for gas rationing. for industrial companies so that the supply to homes, schools, etc. is not interrupted.

The expanded plan involves reducing the Christmas lighting that is part of the celebration in the middle of the winter darkness in many places where they usually shine, nothing beautiful or pleasant is acceptable at least to the Grinch and the Grinch was in fact green in the face of the crisis that They created remember when the aristocracy catches a cold The peasants die of pneumonia if such extreme measures have become necessary in the richest countries what in the name of God is going to happen in the poorest when shortages arrive the poor will inevitably and necessarily resort to less resources Many, even in Germany, are already stockpiling firewood and charcoal for the winter, causing acute shortages.

How can people be encouraged to cut down and burn trees and use charcoal in their homes? The chimneys will help reduce the dreaded atmospheric carbon load. The real poor versus the hypothetical poor. Maybe we can console ourselves here in the West with the idea that the food we take for granted will still be available on our tables, but let's wait. The crops that feed our populations cannot be grown without fertilizers detested by the greens and, more specifically, without ammonia and please tell us if ammonia is derived from natural gas and how many people depend for their daily bread on industrial generation and the consequent availability of targets. of ammonia only three or four billion.

What happens to the continuous production plants responsible for producing ammonia if the supply of natural gas is interrupted even momentarily? They destroyed themselves as they were not designed for such an unlikely event and cannot be restarted, the World Bank itself has recently indicated that 222 million people are already experiencing the threat of famine described as food insecurity. The communists managed to kill a hundred million in the last century with their utopian delusions. We have barely begun to implement the Nightmare to Save the Planet and we have already put twice that number at risk we are told that we are facing an emergency the climate crisis the solution the masses will have to tighten their belts to prevent an even worse future catastrophe the elite academic think tanks and the corporate consultants and politicians who subsidize their intellectual pretensions will not be particularly affected by such an adjustment.

Privileged they are, but the truly poor of that elite must be sacrificed now to save the hypothetical poor of tomorrow, and 222 million people is surely an underestimate as food insecurity worsens in more countries. will impose restrictions on food exports that will damage the international supply lines we all depend on and then, when the consequences of that manifest, increasingly desperate politicians will begin to nationalize and centralize food distribution as they already have French and German on the energy front and cut their farmers to their knees, who in turn will stop growing food not out of spite but because of a terrible economic impossibility, then we will have engendered the kind of feedback loop that can really spiral out of control;

It will be the poor who will at least die first. but as we've all been taught by evil ecological moralizers, the planet has too many people anyway, think about this, well, you shiver too soon in your cold, damp and increasingly expensive and now shoddy accommodation, you might You and your family have been considered expendable excess for thought, this is simply not acceptable. If you dare to claim the moral ground that serves the cause of hunger well, then, in my judgment, you have placed yourself firmly in the enemy camp and more than deserve everything that comes your way.

Also in the psychological and educational sphere we demoralize the young, feeding them a constant diet of concrete Apocalypse, focusing particularly on moderating or even forgetting the laudable ambition of children, urging them to believe that their virtue is nothing more than the force that oppresses others. the innocent and despoils the innocent. virginal planet and if that doesn't work and it works, then there is always castration waiting for the gender dysphoric and you oppose such initiatives at substantial personal risk, but we can take comfort in the fact that a benevolent government is going to establish hot spots in public libraries and museums this winter so that the cold, hungry old people can huddle together to keep warm, their grandchildren coughing their lungs out on their frigid, damp, moldy floors, under such circumstances, in the face of such manipulations and enforced deprivations, it is obvious that The latter are panicked, tyrannical idiots, the virtue signaling the government should be doing is directing its insane attention toward regulating what people serve on their tables, but because meat has also been considered something else that is destroying the planet, compassion-awakened narcissists are already insisting that people eat less. of plants and insects for you and your peasant children and the sooner you get used to it or the better, let us direct our attention to the claim that animal husbandry and the meat it produces at a price low enough for everyone to afford is unsustainable for wait a moment because we have not yet dispensed with enough moralizing and authoritarian stupidity.

Remember what happened the last time government agencies applied their tender Mercy to determine what the people they serve should consume. They offered us the much-vaunted food pyramid that told us to eat 6 to 11 servings. of grains and carbohydrates per day with protein and fat at the Pinnacle, something that should be allowed relatively rarely, if at all, that everything turned out to be wrong and not just a little wrong, but so wrong that it might as well have been done. It's just wrong, but it's a true anti-truth, as wrong as it could be: the food pyramid was created, among other things, by the US Department of Agriculture, that is, by marketers, not by scientists. or nutritionists, with no shortage of lobbying efforts on the part of those whose products ended up being promoted, the dietary recommendation to prioritize carbohydrates produced a true epidemic of obesity and diabetes that resulted in what has been considered by reliable researchers as one of the worst Public Health disasters of all time, causing almost the entire Western population a life of catastrophic chronic illness. health problems 42 percent of Americans are obese, another almost equally large percentage is overweight, at least one-third are in the early or later stages of diabetes, which is an exceptionally serious disease. $1.7 trillion is spent annually on chronic diseases in the U.S. and the increase in such disease and cost is directly associated with the beginning of God-forsaken top-down dietary guidelines that place us all in a carbohydrate-rich dietary route.

Additionally, there have been dozens of studies debunking the claim that red meat causes disease. The purest study published p-u-r-e in the journal landsat in 2017, an analysis of 140,000 people from 18 countries revealed that a higher intake of carbohydrates, not meat and fat, was associated with a higher risk of total mortality and that a higher intake of saturated fat was associated with a lower, that is, lower risk of stroke. exactly the opposite of what we have been told by the centralizing agents of Los Beneficiosos, who were charged with determining what we, as sovereign and responsible individuals, should put in our mouths, so the health benefits of a purely vegetarian diet and vegan are, at best, dubious, but what about the arguments that animal agriculture is killing the planet, the US Environmental Protection Agency estimates that all agriculture produces only 11 percent of greenhouse gases in the U.S.

Transportation produces 27 percent, livestock accounts for three percent, and plant-based agriculture accounts for five percent, according to the National Academy of Sciences: If we eradicate all plant-based agriculture In animals, we would reduce greenhouse gases by just 2.6 percent and, by the way, it is not a simple matter and perhaps impossible to manage a diet that is sustainable in the medium and long term simply by eating plants. chewing that Exodus, the way toNext, what could we do instead if we chose to be genuinely wise rather than inflicting misery and deprivation on the world's poor while completely and disastrously failing to save the planet?

We might begin by assuming here in the West that all those scared into paralysis and drawn to tyranny by their fear of the pending apocalypse, have bitten off more than they can adequately chew, have faced a dragon much more fire-breathing and gruesome than heroic, they have failed to deal with the moral hazard that arises. assuming that the capricious emergence of their overheated imaginations entitles them to the use of power and compulsion, if your apprehension of the coming catastrophe, whatever its form, has turned you into a terrified authoritarian ready to scare and force you out with yours, you're just not the one. leader of these times, since the unconscious manifestations of your own nervous system telling you that you are too small for the job at hand clearly indicate that even you could begin by abandoning our atrocious attitude of self-righteousness toward the world in development, we could admit instead that the rest of the planet's inhabitants have the right and responsibility to move towards the abundant material life that we have enjoyed in spite of ourselves for the last century and that has been so entirely dependent on the activity industrial and the use of fossil fuels that we could work diligently and with the purpose of reducing energy and food prices to the lowest possible level so that we can ease the burden on the poor and open horizons of possibilities for them to worry, as inevitable and appropriately they will, for long term sustainability, instead of acting desperately and destructively in search of their next meal, we could focus on a smart rather than anti-humane management plan. environmentalism along the lines of plans outlined by multifaceted and diligent experts like Dr.

Bjorn Lomberg, who pointed out years ago that we face a multitude of crises and not just one (the hypothetically apocalyptic danger of carbon) and that we could spend the money that they are wasting by killing the poor in a much more intelligent and judicious way, devoting some resources, for example, to ensuring a stable supply of food to poor children in the developing world, treating malaria, something we can do and at low cost, and delivering fresh water where it is really needed, we can do that too. If we work on the details of truly sustainable agriculture with the most expert farmers to improve the quality of our soil and air and provide everyone with enough high-quality food, which will undoubtedly involve animal-based agriculture, we could put an end to the presumption. that the state should extend by Dent from its hypothetical moral superiority to the governance of how we heat our homes and feed and supply our own families, we could finally delegate authority to the most local level possible following the principle of subsidiarity and produce a hierarchy of responsibility that extends necessary purpose to all individually at the family, community and state level and which serves as a necessary bulwark against the top-down, blind and proud, intellect-based tyrannies of emergency and compulsion that otherwise they would necessarily reign. our concerns with sustainability through consensus and in the spirit of voluntary association and free play, rather than relying on top-down edicts justified in principle by our misplaced Existential Terror and which carry the moral hazard of the accumulation of an unjustified and dangerous centralized Authority, we could distribute to all their required responsibility as sovereign actors and could incorporate them with the power of a common vision one of more abundant life high quality food for all enough energy for slavery to become a thing of the past enough purpose that nihilism and decadence no longer demand enough reciprocity for us to live in true peace the generous provision of education and opportunity for all in the world the conviction to say it once again that policies based on coercion are misguided and counterproductive, that way we could have our cake and eat it too and so could everyone else, and we could work towards it in a mutual spirit of productive generosity and fair play in competition and cooperation or we could let the world go to waste. hell and blame that disintegration on the same enemies that we specified as causal in the First of all, those damned capitalists and we fail to cleanse our own souls while we pursue the imaginary evildoers responsible for the destruction of our planet, identifying the real danger said psychologist Carl Jung after Nazi atrocities and the use of nuclear weapons.

It is increasingly evident that it is not hunger, nor microbes, nor cancer, but man himself, that is the greatest danger to humanity, for the simple reason that there is no adequate protection against psychic epidemics that are infinitely more serious. devastating than the worst natural disasters that have ever occurred. The man knew that technological man had a stark choice before him to become as ethical as he was powerful, and that hell awaited us if we refused the challenge. The pace of change is accelerating. Our ability to do almost everything is doubling faster and faster. As our ability to communicate and calculate accelerates, the consequences of our internal disunity and insufficiency become increasingly serious as we become individually more powerful;

In other words, we must take on more responsibilities or else, if we fail to rectify our personal pathologies of Pride, envy and If we are willing to lie, we will find ourselves caught in a conflict with the world, both natural and social, and in proportion pinpoints our refusal to control the Devil Within, so that we have a stark choice before us: we can reorient ourselves toward the cause of Truth or Truth. we can enact conflict by imposing ourselves to serve instrumental deceptions in the world, thereby causing an external apocalypse that will result in precisely the same judgment and, in conclusion, it is time for all of us, but especially self-righteous moralizers, to get our The individual acts together to take real moral responsibility instead of falsely spreading undeserved virtues everywhere and so cheaply and carelessly.