Response to Film Theory's “Is Dory a LIAR?“ Theory

Hello guys, it's the walk of the five Moabites. My answer to movie fairies is the fairy Dori Alya. This fairy claims that in Finding Nemo Dory she is actually faking her short-term memory loss. Now, as always, I say these videos. I have nothing against my pet. I have had to do it. I say this so many times in the past and more haters start accusing me of just continually watching

film

theorists' videos until a new

theory

emerges to answer that that's not the case at all. The reason I encountered this fear is because all of my viewers wanted me to do this if it weren't for them.

I would have never heard of this

theory

. Now I know this statement is that this theory is divided into two parts. However, I'm only watching part 2 because the first part is titled Dori Pretending doesn't help this theory much, all it does is conclude that if Dory has short term memory loss, she has anterograde amnesia, which I agree with. agreement and then Matpat just goes back and forth on points they try and go. against his point until he ends up showing a case that is just a fake story, but it is also mentioned in this part. I don't even know why this theory is split into two parts since the first word is mostly filler, arguably more filler than Luigi's secret identity theory and Matt Pat's other multi-part theories, the split because there is too much evidence to fit in one video, but here you could easily have done this part anyway, the actual points on this first map brings up the point he made at the end of part 1, which is that Dory was able to remember the ship that carried Nemo but forgot Marlin's name, which doesn't work with anterograde amnesia.

I remember when Matt Pett mentioned that point in point one and I instantly saw a major problem with this point when Marlin asked Dory if he had seen a ship. His

response

, which is even played in theory, is: "Hey, I saw a ship." The problem here is that Dory said he saw a ship, not this ship. It's even reimbursable that Marlin says: Have you seen a ship? It doesn't specifically say what kind of ship it's going where it's going or even the fact that it has Nemo on board, so for anyone who hasn't seen the theory, the term anterograde amnesia, that you missed the map editor or a specific way of combination of short-term memory loss, so you can't remember anything after the time you had amnesia, except the use of procedural learning, which I'll get into later, the fact that Dory says she's only seen one ship says It means he could simply be remembering a ship he saw before he lost his short-term memory and not the one Marlon refers to as the one that took Nemo's manpads.

The next proof that Dory falsified her memory is that when she tells Marlon that she suffers from short-term memory loss, she says that it is hereditary, which is not true, since in the tarot degree amnesia is not hereditary and Instead, it is typically caused by drug and alcohol abuse or brain trauma. Another big problem with using this line as an evidence map PAP reproduces the line in the video, however it doesn't show everything, it cut it off right before some very important information here is the full line, no it's true, I forget the things almost instantly.

It runs in the family, well, I mean, at least I think so, at least I think so. Dori can't remember how she got her short term memory blocks, she just thinks it runs in the family, this means that the whole section where Matt Met goes on to say that Nisha was in Tarragona doesn't make any sense since Tori wasn't sure how she got it. and all my pet had to do was watch that clip for one more second, also in the middle of the section on ways to obtain it. The anterograde amnesia metals prevent the idea that fish have very short memories from actually being a misconception, since fish have been able to remember things for about a year, so Matt could use this as additional evidence that Tori He fakes his memory loss, however, I have an argument.

Against this, Dory's short-term memory loss is like a joke about that misconception being used as the basis for her character. This is a Pixar movie after also saying that Dory is faking because her memory doesn't match real life. Fish is a bit dumb in my opinion, the next map the mascot dictates that Dory is faking, which means exaggerating an illness to achieve some kind of goal in regards to her memory loss, with the motive being that she is faking their memory to appear weak in order to survive, for example, one member mentions symptom validity tests that are set up to detect people faking amnesia on these tests. matpat mentions how pretenders intentionally roll the test, while real amnesiacs will have a 50/50 chance of answering correctly again and that pretenders also take longer to respond. questions to make it seem like they are fighting, while niche acts usually have very little delay at any given moment to find Nemo, a school of fish, images of various forms of marine life, such as a lobster, a swordfish, and a octopus, and a boat fails to obtain a single one of them.

True, in addition to having difficulty answering and this seems to contradict, the outside is able to identify a variety of marine life, such as sharks and whales, but there is an argument I have against this: Dory may have been aware of some forms of marine life. like the one she identifies before losing her short-term memory and had never seen a lobster, swordfish or octopus until after suffering amnesia, also considering that a major theme of the

film

's plot is the fact that Marlin keeps Nemo inside. I really need to say this. Well, the anemone, it's possible that Dory was raised in a similar way, as she may have been protected for this type of sea life when she was a baby, I mean, in the universe of Finding Nemo, swordfish or killer whales. children, and a swordfish is one of the secrets that the school creates, but another point against it is the fact that there are still some forms of marine life that Dory does not know about in the movie, especially the jellyfish while swimming in a flock of them. and she clicks on the map below showing how Dory can't remember Nemo's name, but all the names she calls him end with an O, which doesn't apply to questioning me, since it's very likely that they call Nemo completely . different name now since I only saw Finding Nemo when I was very young I may be completely wrong and I say this but I go to procedural learning which is the process of interrogating each X remembering certain things repeating them in Dory's case her motto of just keep swimming is a perfect example of this, so with the fact that Marlin constantly mentions Nemo's name throughout the movie, maybe it could work similarly in which story he can remember that Nemo's name ends in O but doesn't. the rest of his name again, I could be completely wrong since The Story may have done this after hearing Nemo's name once, but it's an idea that I think is worth considering another argument against this and I try to avoid use these types of plots, but it could just be a plot hole, a lot of movies have plot holes, so Dory remembering the O at the end of Nemo's name could be just one, since when combined with my plots of counting for the later evidence theory, this appears to be one on a few selected occasions that contradicts with the anterograde amnesia the direction where Nemo is in the diving mask, but the inner speech for Marlene, she could only remember the beginning, which is what a faker would do when I saw this part.

I immediately thought of one thing, the full address is pshh urban 42 Wallaby Way Sydney. Now, what part of that would you say is the easiest to remember? I don't know about you, but for me it is the beginning, this is because it has a letter, not a simple name and a number, which makes it easy to remember when following the procedure. learning a story continue reading the address on the back of the mask about the movie finally map showing how Dory didn't seem to know what sharks are when she met Bruce as she doesn't seem to be afraid but later recognizes them easily After finding the mask now again, I don't remember how exactly the scene plays out, but it's also possible that Dory knows what sharks are, since I don't remember Dory not knowing what a shark is, but again, I could be wrong, but I may not.

I know they eat fish since when she identifies the sharks he says oh look sharks like he's not scared at all even then this could once again be a blip. Additionally MANPAD points out how at the end of the movie Dory is able to remember Bruce and the other sharks. The fish motto is friends, not food, but the learning procedure also refutes this point, as Bruce and the sharks say this. all the time, since it's her motto, so it would be much easier for Dory to remember it. Also, the bat says Dory shouldn't. I can't remember the tagline as it was hours and days later, although an unspecified amount of time passed so you can't say the last few days.

I'd say it would only be a day later since it's the next day of school, but still. Dory would probably be able to remember the motto, since procedural learning acts unconsciously, as demonstrated by Mat Bat in the first part. Procedural learning allows someone to remember knowledge without her actually knowing it, so Tory could have instinctively said the model without even remembering it now that it exists. Another piece of evidence that people use against this theory that I've seen in the comments section is finding Dory. Now I haven't seen finding Dory and even if she had I wouldn't want to spoil it, but apparently there is some plot.

The points in the movie show that this is very wrong. This is basically a case where Matpat should have waited for the movie to come out before doing this, instead of doing it very much because of the movie, even if he wasn't going against the boatman that Peck could have done. I also used evidence of that when it came out on DVD, of course, to avoid copyright, finally before anything outside of this video, there's another thing I want to talk about and that is that at the end of this video, matpat encourages her viewers to tweet this ferry to Ellen DeGeneres, you know Dory's voice actress with the hashtag exposing Dory.

This really surprised me when I found it, which was actually right when I was writing the script, but not in a good way, honestly, I'm the kind of me that we lose some respect for. But since, for my part, this not only seems like a blatant attempt to really spread the publicity about this, but movie critics are actually tweeting this to Ellen DeGeneres, then I feel really bad for her, not only is she being harassed by these swarms of comas. Constantly talking about this ferry but consuming that matpat, he concludes the story by calling Dory a con artist who manipulated her father's emotions to get into her house.

I could see Ellen getting generally angry about this, since the character she voices is being called all these negatives. things and being accused of doing terrible actions apparently Leonardo DiCaprio got thousands of tweets about the revenant movie theory so I'm legitimately worried, maybe I'm reading too much into this and exaggerating some things but that's just how I feel . but with that I'll end it here with my typical comment: I'll see you in my next

response

video, at least matpat released the final part next week, unlike a certain theory.