The Truth About Climate Change

Have you heard the news? 97% of scientists agree that

climate

change

is getting worse. Carbon could cost us the planet. Just look out the window. He looks out the window because it's a hot day and his little piece of the world. How superficial is that and what does it mean? It means that when we hear that the debate is settled 97% 97% 97% of scientists agree, of course, I believe in global warming, that Michaels is called a

climate

change

denier, but he agrees that the planet is warm. 97% of scientists agree that global warming is real. and people have something to do with it climate change climate changes temperatures have risen 4 degrees since what was called the Little Ice Age hundreds of years ago and two degrees over the last century the real question is is it dangerous, If it's going to go after people exactly there, there's no 97% consensus on that, of course, there's no consensus on generating fear like this if we lose the polar caps, you know how it would reach up to the elbow of the Statue of Liberty, but not even the UN computer models predict the 20 feet that Neil deGrasse Tyson and Al Gore predict we invited them and 20 other alarmists to make their points on this show, only one bill Mumma agreed, he is concerned about the hot car effect when you put your car in the sun it's 70 degrees outside.

In your car it is 140, how did it happen? That is exactly what is happening to the atmosphere. The climate model that the government was so excited about has been completely wrong until now. Well, I would say that climate models are actually better than economic models. Well, they're both bad. Well, I died, I wouldn't object to that conclusion, but why should we change our lives based on bad models? Because the last time carbon dioxide was like that, back in the day sea levels were maybe 20 feet higher than them. now that was before humans existed warming will resume but it doesn't really matter if it warms one degree in the next 60 years it warmed okay in the last hundred years life expectancy doubled a few degrees warming could be good It could be a few, depending on where you are, cold snaps kill many more people than he could.

I don't know how many tens of thousands of people died in Europe in 2003 in the heat wave, tens of thousands died, he can kill, but many more people die from the cold the CDC says the heat kills 600 Americans a year the cold kills more than twice this budget asks for $1.1 billion to address climate change the agency fails to get money in front of a congressional committee and says, "You know my problem, it's really No problem, you have to give it the money to someone else. No, problems compete with each other for your money, so you have to scare them.

We have to act in this decade like someone who gets paid to investigate. I'm very excited to go home and have fun with. scientific confidence that warming is contributing to sea level rise and other changes I've lived through eight environmental apocalypses: the population bomb, acid rain, the ozone hole, global cooling, you name it, the warming fear. global has longer legs. because he has more money, which also gives climate alarmists a reason to crush dissent. Climate change deniers suggest there is still a debate about the science. alarmists what changed well The Climategate emails reveal a plot between the world's leading climate scientists and a group of esteemed scientists were strategizing to crush their opponents and I thought, oh wait a minute, why should I believe this instead of my own judgment?

What scientists really agree on is a very narrow portion of things, yes, temperatures have risen overall over the last few hundred years, no doubt, and carbon dioxide acts to warm the planet, but there is no agreement on whether warming is dangerous or not for saying that you were one of the targets of the congressman saying show us where you get your money yes, yes, yes, I was one of the seven, the seven climate skeptics were branded heretics for reveal all his sources of funds, curry abandoned science, this is after praising and pressuring me for a few years.

Ago, you know the prestigious one, so you have raw onions, now yes, I was trying to be honest as a scientist, I was very unpopular with many of my colleagues, they were trying to crush people who disagreed with them and they succeeded. I receive emails. all the time from people who wish they could talk about what they're worried about losing their jobs it's dangerous to dissent when climate change is something politicians approach with religious zeal admit it's a religion the head of the United Nations climate panel said it's his religion When you emit greenhouse gases you feel like you are committing a sin I guess if I were a preacher I would say we are all sinners but there is redemption in the future what is redemption my wife and I decided to build a zero net energy house in New England it is completely solar but it's expensive, it's basically tax free money to me, yes taxpayers subsidize you and me.

I did it. Hey, what's so fair about only harming the poor? They ask all these Nobel Prize winners what we need. do to help the world, yes, addressing climate change was way down the list, a million people die of dysentery, yes, absolutely water, horrible things that are killing people now and would be cheap to fix, by the way, more cheaper than theirs, do it before we worry. about global warming, but it is not one or the other, but government action is one or the other, we do not have infinite money, if we want to help people, we must do what really helps.