Top 10 Most Unreliable Car Brands of Last Year.

What were the 10

most

unreliable

car

brands

of

last

year

? Now you might be surprised by some of the

brands

on this list. He certainly was. This video is going to bother some people, mainly those who own any of the cars made by the manufacturers on this list. That's right, for some reason, when a YouTuber makes a video about cars that turns out to be more than just complimentary, they

most

ly get positive comments of thanks for being honest, finally someone who isn't sponsored by a manufacturer who will tell the truth, but The comments that come from the minority of people who actually own one of the cars mentioned negatively are a different story, there you go crazy and it usually doesn't matter what car it is, everyone is happy for you to despise a car unless it's one of they. then you're going to make them angry and you won't like them if they get angry.

I made a video about whether it was worth buying a cheap Bentley Continental. It's tempting since some of them are becoming really affordable. Now I'll put a link. In that video at the end of this one now, most people enjoyed an honest review of a cheap Bentley Continental, all except Bentley Continental alone, as they weren't happy at all, in fact some agreed they had had experiences similar and fell apart. of them or are about to, but die-hard Continental fans were very unhappy comments like: you bought a cheap association, the mine is amazing or you bought the only bad one, what do you expect? another Bentley owner said you don't know how to buy good cars you should have spent more money and then you get a better one, missing the point a bit in the video and another Bentley owner said he just hates people who have done better in the life that he, what an absolutely easy review, oh now there are a few different reliability surveys done each

year

by people like what car and warranty among others, but usually it's always the same names that appear there, although sometimes in a slightly different order, which is why this list has been compiled. not from one but multiple surveys, so with that in mind, here's a list of the 10 most

unreliable

automakers from

last

year.

If your car is made by one of the brands on the list, don't hesitate to complain to other car owners of the same brand whose exasperation with your unreliable car motivated them to complain negatively in a reliability survey, vent your annoyance because your car is on this list now I should point out that this is not the list of the least reliable models that I list different and will be covered in a separate video. This list is about the brands as a whole, so for all of you who don't know any of the brands on this list, this video is for you now according to people who drive cars. and complete surveys with your own opinions, the 10th most unreliable car brand is well, there is no can because there are two joint ninths, so the first 9th most unreliable car brand is Vauxhall, no wonder, then complete fart boxes built out of marshmallow, now I need to consult legal advice here because there is now a trend for people and companies to sue you if they don't like what you say about them, so where is it?

Oh yeah, insert name here so the voxels don't suck. I just think they are. Vauxhall made some good cars in the past so I know they can do it, they just choose not to, they are only slightly more reliable than the average French car and that's a pretty low bar. Common faults reported include problems with the infotainment system gearboxes. gear links electrical and steering faults quarters The stars and badges seem to be the worst offenders in the range, there are now plenty of brands that deserve and will probably get a kicking on this channel for being rubbish but most of the time they haven't made. a couple of good cars in the past so maybe we'll do a series on cool cars made by great car manufacturers hmm where was I?

Oh yes, another shared 9th places in the hands of Mercedes, now growing up in the 80s I was quite surprised. Still think of Mercedes as a solid, bulletproof vehicle capable of traveling billions of miles with ease. They were a stable choice for taxi drivers throughout Europe, as they were never wrong; However, that reputation apparently disappeared long ago. This is probably due to one or two reasons why the jury is out. Now Mercedes, despite having high prices, has decided to use cheaper parts because they know that their wealthy customers will probably buy a new one in three years, so the cars do not need to last as long as before and they realize that they no longer need them. they need. to build cars, they will be bulletproof for the second and third owners, meaning they can maximize their profits with cheap parts.

The problem is that cars aren't built that well. The problem starts to appear on the first property. The second possible reason. is that instead of building simple and reliable machines like they used to, they now push the boundaries of technology, all cars are loaded with cutting edge technology and this technology is based on electrical chips and processors that make everything in the cars run, from the infotainment system to the gearbox, so if they fail the component they control also fails, this means that electrical failures are responsible for the majority of mechanical failures. Now all models are apparently guilty, but the GLE is supposedly the least reliable model and suffers from problems with its electrical system. system is lift system body Integrity of body hardware and car electronics, so not much, then the eighth most unreliable manufacturer last year was Nissan.

Now I like Japanese cars, you just can't beat them for reliability. Nissan is the exception they used to make solid cars. The solid bluebird taxi The patrol car as tough as a Land Cruiser The first buses were bulletproof and are still pizza delivery favorites that outlasted the new buses by decades, but then they went and made a deal with Renault of all kinds. people. Now I will never understand this, someone must have done it. He became very rich because it doesn't make sense why a company that makes reliable, well-built cars would start using parts like engines and gearboxes from a company that makes cars out of cheese.

Imagine if Toyota said they were going to start using Citroën engines. home with a suitcase full of dollar bills they need to hide now Nissan's build quality is on par with French automakers with multiple common faults such as leaky cabins and steering problems and, understandably, Engines and gearboxes also have frequent failures. The DCI diesels are terrible, but the 0.9-litre, 1.2 and 1.6 petrol engines are almost as bad as the number seven Jaguar, oh Jaguar. I like Jaguar's styling, but I've never owned another one. I had two in the past. I had an XF. that it would eat the EGR valves and the fuel cap would get stuck leaving me stranded in the middle of nowhere now as I said in previous videos my dad had a couple of jaguars and we would often get stranded going on family vacations.

I think the automotive world would do it. It would be a sadder place without Jagger, but they have a lot of work to do. They have always been quite unreliable since the 60s, but I heard they made big improvements, especially with a new range of engines, and they say Jaguar has improved. Their reliability scores a bit from 2021 so it's heading in the right direction but they still have a long way to go, to be fair it appears to be the now discontinued XF that is dragging the brand towards number six in the list, now it's Ford.

It's definitely going to divide the audience and ignite hardcore Ford fans, it seems like the late model Puma hybrids aren't as reliable and suffer from, among other things, hybrid battery failures, but it's the Fiesta that's responsible for the biggest part of the reliability problems. Although thankfully not so much when they are new, they just don't age very well. Common failures affect throttle bodies, fan motors, gearboxes, fuel pump, and control arms. They are not big problems, but they are quite common and mean that the car can fail quite frequently. Let it down, making it to the top five of automotive shit is Peugeot's French build quality built to last about a week, the problems seem to be all over the range and mostly electoral Gremlins and also injector problems, there will be people who own a Persia out there who have done it.

I didn't have any problems, it's fine and before you write, I'm happy for you. May your car remain reliable. It was obviously built before lunchtime, before the factory workers drank a bottle of red with their cake. Not all cars are lemons. but there are many who have problems. Fourth on the list is Alfa Romeo. Now I've had one of these too and I love driving it when it worked to be fair to Alpha. They are not really promoted as trustworthy, no one thinks about them. Alphas are trustworthy and yet no one cares if you love Alphas, you love them.

They are generally very stylish and great to drive, but they are not reliable. The motor itself is pretty good, but the electrical faults seem to be the Achilles' heel. Most electrical faults can be simply annoying. but the electrical system that controls the engine can also fail, meaning you get stuck on the side of the road and then have to call one of those yellow Alcoholics Anonymous vans that beat Alfa Romeo to third place, but Fiat has all the unreliability of an Alfa without any of the style, most of the range is painfully vanilla and goes wrong more often than most brands.

Repair costs are also above average, meaning it can actually be quite expensive to run. The girls' favorite Fiat 500 is no exception. Clutch quality issues and oil leaks seem to plague the 500, but the Fiat 124 Spider pretty much sums up Fiat's attitude towards build quality. It is based on the MX-5, which scores very highly in reliability surveys. It shares the chassis, suspension and most components. The interior is even built in the same Factory Good Start at the time, but then by adding their own shitty electrical systems and motors they found themselves with a totally different Beast. The 1.4 multi-air is not a hopeless case, but things like seals failing on the plastic intercooler. it can really disappoint you, it also costs a little more than the MX-5 and is a little slower, amazing, the second most reliable brand on the list is Land Rover, this was another surprise for me, not because it's on the list, oh No, because it is not the first.

Land Rover has a loyal and dedicated off-road fan base who use their cars for their intended purpose and know how to manipulate them to keep them going, but there is a much larger contingent of people who buy these cars as a daily fashion statement. combo of drivers, a small minority will say they have never had a big problem, but you are in a small minority, another section of owners will tell you that you should budget between five and ten thousand pounds a year for repairs and that is a small price to pay. to turn off. Drive a Range Rover and if you can't afford it, don't buy a damn blah, because a Land Cruiser does the same job and you can keep your five or ten thousand dollars to spend on something else under the warranty.

Last year, Land Rover incurred by far the largest garage repair bill: £23,889 53p, which is around the same price as a new Mazda MX-5, the previous Range Rover Evoque and the current Land Rover Discovery, Both are last on the list. In their respective classes, there are several problems reported with these vehicles such as leaking head gaskets, throttle body, coolant leaks, oil leaks, air suspension failing a lot and the list goes on and on, first of all, last year's least reliable manufacturer, which must have done it. A pretty amazing job in car building to knock Land Rover off the top spot is Jeep.

Historically, the United States has made a lot of pretty solid cars capable of huge mileage. The Ford Crown Victoria, for example, can withstand all the knocks of daily police life or become a reliable officer. taxi and can easily cover half a million miles and then there's the old school Ford F-150 but we don't get the good ones in the UK, no we don't have jeeps and neither do the solid Jeeps or the 80's Jeeps and we're integrated with Fiat as part of the Fiat Chrysler Group and we are all aware of theShitty genes that Fiat can bring to an automatic motive - a love of children's motors, electricity and overall tiramisu-carved build quality means that none of the ranges rate well when it comes to reliability, including the Gladiator and the Cherokee, but the worst thing in the range is that the Wrangler's problems range from electrical Gremlins to frame integrity, although it doesn't seem to damage the sails, the Wrangler has a dedicated following of people who love it. the styling, the off-road capability and the adventurous image it gives them, let's just hope the jeep can kick the fear out of bed and return to the Glory Days of solid, well-built cars, I can't see that happening, although the economy The world has changed too much, but we can hope that Jeep is the only manufacturer to have a Purple Heart award-winning car after all.

That's true. You can search for it. A Jeep won a Purple Heart in World War II. I've been rambling for a long time. Enough thanks for watching and if you want to see another video from us, click here see you later Friends and keep taking your meds, come on.