Shocking FINAL Results After Testing 26 Different Protection Products On My Car

It looks like we just coded it, that's amazing, I love it, this product is a scam and I hope this company goes out of business because it's absolutely horrible. I don't want anyone to buy this product. I will take away some points because Durability wise, it got a seven out of ten. It's been six months since I put 26

different

products

in my car. I washed it every two weeks. This will be wash number 12 and this will be the

final

video. I'm going to rank all the

products

I put in my car, we'll rank them by cost, durability, and ease of use.

It is a weighted scale, so 50% of the weight will depend on the products performance and durability. 25 will be on cost and 25 on ease of use, let's get started. I rated each product on a scale that you can see here, so the lower the price per ounce, the more points the product gets, the easier it will be. The use and duration of the product will determine another point value. I created a separate rating system for entry-level short-term protectors versus long-term ceramic coatings. Products will score from 1 to 10 in each category with the durability category. counting 50 of the total score and then converted everything to a score of 100, so to get 100 out of 100 you have to be under a certain price, be stupid, easy to use and have excellent durability, so The product Perfect would be cheap, easy to use and last a long time, but we don't live in a perfect world and that's why I'm doing this test.

It's great to be able to see the car and how the

different

products work. they look a little bit different you can see some of these panels are a little bit dirtier and some of them are a little bit cleaner than others it's cool to see the difference in how they look you know look at this where this product is that part of the car looks a little bit cleaner than that and it looks a little bit more dark gray here where it looks a little bit more and you can see the differences, you can see the tape lines, there are some of the long term coatings and here are some of the short life coatings that we use and you can see here there's almost no difference, it looks like there's not much there, it's six months and I don't expect many of these short life coatings In fact, I'm still in the car .

I also think it's important for you to know that none of these companies are paying me to do this test. I do it out of my own curiosity and I want to find out which products are the best and which ones are crap and then I can share that information with you through this video. Also, you may get different

results

than me depending on how often you drive the car, how often you wash it, where you store it, if it's outside or in the garage, or what type of paint it is, so I always encourage you to do your own research because

results

may differ.

What's going on, my friends, if you own a detailing business and are looking for ways to expand and grow your business? I want to tell you about detailed professional monthly memberships. It's a group run by me and my business partner Greg, and there are many benefits to joining, including exclusive business content from Greg and I about how we run our business and the things we've done. here at chicago water pros to make it a success and what it is today, you will also have access to discounted wholesale prices at car Supplieswarehouse.com with free shipping. I promise you it's the best deal you'll find on details. products and tools, you will also have access to our live Q&A sessions each month with special guests, you will be included in our private chat group and your business will be added to the detailed auto supplies map. warehouse.com check it out, there is a link in the description below, it's only 35 a month, there is no contract, there is no commitment and you can cancel at any time and I think you will find a lot of value when you become a member, so The first product What we tried was the F11 top coat.

We bought a 16 ounce bottle and that bottle cost 53.99. The product didn't even last two weeks in the car and I did a second test because it was the first. The product failed on the car and I was so surprised that it failed within the first two weeks that I gave it a second try and a durability test and it did the same thing. It didn't last long. This product is a scam. and I hope this company closes because it is absolutely horrible. I don't want anyone to buy this product. It was one of the most expensive products per ounce that we purchased, which is why it got a 3 out of 10 for the price it got. 10 out of 10 for ease of use because it's literally like water, you wipe it and wipe it, it had nothing to do with durability. 0 out of 10.

So a grand total of 13 out of 20, which translates to 32.5 out of 100 on the weighted scale, so total failure product number two is here and you can see it's doing well, it's still there, it's not perfect, but it's still there, it's still hydrophobic, you can see the water falling, this is Adam's graphene coating spray, we bought a 12 ounce bottle for 29.74, so the price per oz is a little more expensive on the spray coatings but it wasn't terrible, it was super easy to use and after six months you can see it's still there which is why this product scored. a 6 out of 10 for price, a 9 out of 10 for ease of use and a 10 out of 10 for durability, so anything in this short-term category that lasts six months and more will get a 10 out of 10. so after all on the weighted scale 87.5 out of a hundred, number three is the g technic c2 ​​v3 liquid crystal we bought a one ounce bottle, it was 49.99 at the time of the test we did, the price per ounce is at the lower end of the scale so This got an 8 out of 10 for cost, ease of use, it's very easy to use, if you use it too much it can get a little scratchy so you have to keep that in mind and I gave it a 8 out of 10. about the ease of use and then the durability we got, it's still there a little bit, you can still see it's still trying to work, it's not as dead as the f11 but it certainly needs to be reapplied so I'll give it a try.

I put it at four and a half. months, so for durability it got a seven out of ten, so 75 out of 100 on that product, the next product is a quick detailer, so this product is not intended to be a ceramic coating, it is a detailer fast and has a durability claim of one month. And this really surprised me because you can see on the top that it still has some hydrophobic properties. It's definitely about to disappear. There's not much left there, but I was pleasantly surprised because it's so low on the cost scale here. this product wasn't exactly a fair fight it's like putting me in a ring with mike tyson when i was body punching him i heard him actually crying there just it's not apples to apples it's not a ceramic product but it had a very good cost, 9 out of 10 so it's on the lower end of all these products, it was super easy to use so 9 out of 10 and the durability again lasted almost four and a half, almost five months I would say, and I gave it an 8 out of 10 for durability, so 85 out of 100 for quick detailed details.

Well, we have two of the type of products that you see on television, if you see me looking. youtube you'll probably get a lot of ads for these next two. Number five is Shine Armor Fortify 1995 for six ounces, so it was spot on in the two to three month durability estimate. You can see, you can see it's pretty flat. After two or three months of using that product, it was also pretty easy to use, but it was on the higher end of the price scale, so it got a 4 out of 10 for price and a 9 out of 10 in the easy category. , so it's very easy. to wear and 6 out of 10 for durability so 62.5 out of 100 for fortified shine armor all good number six is ​​mirror shine with torque detail 29.95 for 16 ounces so it's in the lower end of the price per ounce scale again, it did not. it lasts a long time you can see it is quite flat it has no hydrophobic properties so the durability is not very long and it was easy to use again not bad so 7 out of 10 for price 9 out of 10 ease of use and 3 out of 10 for durability, it didn't last as long as the shiny armor, so I gave the door a 55 out of 100, a little bit of hydrophobic properties there, but again, like all of these short term, um, we.

We are reaching the end of its shelf life, so the first product you see on the right side of the door is Tech Technician's Choice 582. This is one of the lowest priced products because you can buy it in a gallon, so which costs 39.39 and 95 cents. a gallon smells fantastic 10 out of 10 for price it's one of the best priced products out there uh 9 out of 10 for ease of use it's very easy to use we use it here in the shop on many cars but it didn't last While I thought about it we got about 3 months, so it gets a 5 out of 10 for durability because it's very easy to use and the price is very affordable, it rated higher, so it got 72.5 out of 100 on our list here, right next to Our list is the modesta m2 blast.

I originally thought you could use this product as a standalone product, but I was corrected: it is a modesta ceramic coating topper that is used to help against water stains on a ceramic coating, so it is not really valid in this test , but if you've used it as a standalone product I'll still rank it on the list, it's pretty high in the price per ounce category and it didn't last much more than a couple of months so 1 out of 10 price because it's a bottle very small it's a little expensive 8 out of 10 for ease of use it's very easy to use and it gets a 5 out of 10 for durability because it lasted a couple of months so 47.5 there our next product okay this is it interesting because it was quite hydrophobic the last time I washed this and you can see it's starting to the water is actually starting to flood in a little bit, but it's starting to go away. so this product is a lithium ceramic slam, it's about the same price as graphene atoms and it lasted just under graphene, so atom graph is the longest lasting short term product here, but number two is this lithium ceramic slam, it was difficult to apply, so I didn't get a very good job, a very good score for ease of use, so 6 out of 10 for price, 5 out of 10 for use and got a 9 out of 10 for durability because now you can see it, it just lasted less. six months I would say six months you would probably have to replace this product number 10 on our list it is a hydro slippery chemical and this is moving into kind of the pace category, but I would still consider it a short term

protection

option. in your car and this product is on the lower end of the price per ounce scale, so it was a little cheaper, it was easier to apply than the Lithium Ceramic Slam, but only a little and it wasn't even close to their statements. year of durability uh this was around the two or three months that it started to fail so 7 out of 10 on a price 6 out of 10 on use and 2 out of 10 on durability 42.5 for that product all good , number 11, new finish. polish once a year that doesn't last all year the price is very good it's a relatively cheap product but it sucks compared to the ease of use of some of these spray products that you just wipe off with a cloth this is a wax product , so ease of use isn't really important, so I give this a 10 out of 10 for price because it's cheap, 6 out of 10 for durability, and 5 out of 10 for actual durability, so a total of 65 on the scale The number 12 is connelite insulating wax.

This product was a little thick in the bottle. I didn't use it correctly. I was corrected after the point where you use this product. You want to heat it up so you can clean it evenly. I'll take a few points off because it was a bit annoying, so the price is 8 out of 10, the ease of use is 6 out of 10 and the durability is also 6 out of 10. I look forward to seeing this. The product lasts a little longer if you heat it up and mix it well, so number 13 and number 14 are all in one products, so they have some polishing capabilities and some protective capabilities, neither of them lasted long. which is probably due to user error on my part and I want to run a different type of test for both products.

I don't really think they belong in this test as a standalone protector but I will go over it so we have the dr beasley z1 and the rupez one to scale so the rupes product was very easy to use the dr beasley was not as easy to use as a little sticky on the paint. I need to do some more

testing

before I can give an opinion. on both products, but the rupes was definitely more profitable than Dr. Beasley's product, so for now the Rupes Uno is at 47.5 and the Dr. Beasley at 40 until I can do more

testing

with them, we are also testing the long-term coatings that we're going to get to, but I want to jump to the ceiling where we have four other short-term spray coatings that we're testing.

Number 23 is the pns bead maker paint saver, this is Again, it's super easy to use andIt's the cheapest product on our list when you buy it by the gallon, so it's the winner. You have to use a lot when you start with this product, so the price per application really increases. It went up a bit there, so if you want to keep track of that 10 out of 10 for cost, 9 out of 10 for ease of use, but it's not going to last long, you'll get a 3 out of 10 for durability. 62.5 was the total. score on the one next to it, right next to it, is car pro reload and this is another product that I've done a couple of tests with at the moment and I really haven't been very impressed that I haven't had great results with that product.

It may be a little streaky when applied to dark colored vehicles. We lost effectiveness after just a couple of months, so for the price, uh, seven out. out of ten ease of use seven out of ten and durability three out of ten, so 52 in car pro refill number 25 is a new product they sent me called veros ceramic spray again. I've used it a couple of times, it's very expensive for an eight ounce bottle 59.59 which makes it very expensive compared to the rest of these products and it's super easy to use, wipe clean, it's kind of oily product, so it's a little different, but I haven't tried it.

I have very good results for durability, as you can see the panel is quite flat, which is why it got a 0 out of 10 for cost because it is the most expensive product. 10 out of 10 for ease of use because it's really easy to use, just wipe it right there. and you can leave it there for about 10 minutes or so and then wipe it off, but 3 out of 10 for durability, leaving it at 40 out of 100 and our last spot on the ceiling, here you can see we're still trying. I've got a little bit of uh it's trying to work its way in there so it's still working but it definitely probably needs to be reapplied I mean 303 nano graphic spray 17.95 for 15.5 ounces really on the lower end of the price per ounce, so we got 8 out of 10.

For the price, it's like a wax, you put it on, apply it, let it fog up, and then wipe it off, so ease of use isn't ideal. It got a 7 out of 10 for ease of use and that's it. Lasted over three months in this car, you can still work there, so I gave it a 7 out of 10 for durability. 72.5 out of 100. Now, let's move on to our long-term ceramic coatings. The first coating we tested here is Dr. Beasley's Nano Resin has an estimated durability of two to three years. It costs seventy-four dollars a bottle. One bottle should cover the entire car.

I'm disappointed with the look of this one. You can see it there. It looks like the rest of the spray. coatings we used at six months, I think last time I think it was a failure at three months, so it didn't last long, very disappointed because it's already failing. This is a different scale compared to short term coatings, so take a look at the different scales and the different numbers I have there, so 6 out of 10 on a price 8 out of 10 on use, it wasn't difficult to use, but 1 out of 10 in durability 40 out of 100. This is I keep looking, look at that, this is what I expect a coating to look like after six months, so after six months, Jionmo's second quarter remains fantastic, it looks like We just coated it, that's amazing, I love it, you'll have to put on two coats of this. coating which I don't like to do two coats on because I'm lazy 129 per bottle so it's a little more expensive but the durability which claims to be 18 months it's only been six months I mean it looks new and still so it's incredible.

I love it 6 out of 10 in cost 7 out of 10 in use and so far the durability is 10 out of 10 i.e. 82.5 out of 100. Number 17. This is the tech 580 ceramic coating chosen by the technicians and you can see the top of the There's a coating, uh, it's pretty flat at the top, there at the bottom, here you can see it, it looks more hydrophilic than hydrophobic, you can see the water sliding there very slowly, one started very, very strong, looked fantastic when we first put it on. but the durability is already wearing off after six months as it's the least expensive coating we have here in our long term coating test so that's a plus but after six months it's on its way out the door , nine out of ten in price. very good price, nine out of 10 on application, it was very very easy to use but only a three out of ten for durability so this one gets a 60 out of 100 right next to it, another very good looking coating, look on top.

It looks very hydrophobic on the bottom, you can see it's a little bit more, it makes a little bit more sheeting than actually beating, so that might have to do with just driving and placing all the elements on the bottom of the car, it usually won't. See that the protectors also last on the bottom of the car compared to the top of the door. This is the Ammo Reflex Pro Polish Coat. It is the most expensive bottle we purchased. Looks great. I had no problems with the application. It worked very well. It's kind of unique because it's an antibacterial coating which in the world we live in today is great so coming in and out, if you put this on your door handles you have some germ killing abilities which is great. innovative but honestly you probably shouldn't touch the paint anyway so 3 out of 10 for cost, ease of use was 8 out of 10 and durability so far 10 out of 10. 77.5 out of 100. two coatings most very popular so far, so the first one we have number 19 is g technic crystal serum light, one of my favorite coatings, we use it a lot here in the store, I think the same is the ammunition.

You have a really nice bead on the top and maybe a little less feeding and a little more foiling on the bottom, it's 69.99 per bottle at the time of this video and I think this one is about to go up a little price, but still very well priced 6 out of 10 Price wise, it is very easy to use. 8 out of 10 in use and so far 10 out of 10 in durability. We'll see how it lasts. However in the next test 85 out of 100 so far next is car pro uk 30 so a bit cheaper than the crystal serum light it's 54.99 a bottle you have to put two coats on it so It's not as easy to use as the crystal serum light and it still works, and if I had to say which one looks better on csl and uk, I'd say it's pretty close if I spray them both here.

You can see a little more foil on this side. It takes a little more time to sheath them. This one is also closer to the wheel, so it's probably getting a lot. more salt and debris on that side over there, I'd say CSL is doing a little better than the UK. I'll be interested to see him in the nine month and one year test on this side, I'm sure this one is holding up. fantastic six months seven out of ten on price seven out of ten on ease of use because you have to put two coats on it and 10 out of 10 for durability its still there 85 out of 100 this is the glass parity graphene coating still going strong maybe same as the others, maybe just a little bit of hydrophilic properties instead of hydrophobic at the bottom, $149 a bottle so again expensive 6 out of 10 price 8 out of 10 in use very easy to use 10 out of 10 In durability our last product here is that it is not a long term ceramic coating like the others and it is a little more than just a short term spray ceramic coating so it is strange that it is rated for six months of durability, for which is not rated for very long, but you can see it is working very well, it will last over six months, I think it is working very well, fifty four dollars for this product per can, so the price per can is high. ounce if you use it as one of the short term spray protectants because it has a six month durability but it is cheap if you use it as a long term coating and I would say you could probably use this as a long term coating because seeing This is working very well after six months.

I think we're definitely going to get at least nine or twelve months out of that coating, so I'm going to take it long term. term coating side, so 10 out of 10 on a price 8 out of 10 in use, very easy to use and at the moment it is still going strong, so it is a 10 out of 10 on the durability scale, up to the windshield coverings and so on. you know which ones we have in the number one spot this is the g1 smart vision glass parents see the auto pro flyby forte and then the dr beasley glass serum so in this test here of the least expensive to the most expensive, so you can't have a licensed installer install the glass coin, so you can't install it yourselves, but the other products here, the second most expensive, will be $73 an ounce and that's the serum for Dr.

Beasley's glass, fro's car the car pro flyby forte. It costs 59 dollars per ounce and the g1 smart vision costs 39 dollars per ounce of all these products, the flyby forte was the easiest to install, followed by the smart vision, the glass parency and the dr beasley was last on that list, as you can see. I think it's pretty clear which one works best, so where the wipers are you can see that it has failed both on the glass appearance like Dr. Beasleys and it's starting to fail on the pro side of the car, but the g1. Smart vision, it still looks great, look, the water is still very hydrophobic, the water is fooling everything else, but I think it's a clear winner, it's the cheapest, it's one of the easiest to use and it lasts more, so I did it.

I don't rank them on a numerical scale, but I can easily see that the smart vision g-technic smart vision g1 is the winner for glass, so there it is, let me know what you think in the description below your thoughts and opinions on some. Of the products you've used, this was interesting and we have a few more products I want to try, so let's do this again. I'm going to eliminate these short term products in the car and replace them with other contenders and use some of the products that lasted the longest here and maybe put them in a different spot.

We will maintain those protective coatings long term so we can do more testing. but thanks for watching and see you next time.