OceanGate Is Getting Majorly Sued

Who could have foreseen that something was wrong with the Titan? Well, the lawyers, that's who, but will all this legal paperwork save Ocean Gate, the company, from ruinous lawsuits and will the victims' estate be able to recover anything long before the Ocean Gate disaster? CEO Stockton Rush was optimistic about the submersible he built to visit the Titanic. He mocked the complex navigation systems used by other commercial submarines. We only have one button. That's all. This is to other submersibles what the iPhone was to the Blackbird Rush. He was proud of that. he repaired off-the-shelf items from Camping World and charged people 250,000 a piece to travel two miles under the sea taking off-the-shelf parts and putting them together by sort of macgyvering them, yeah, that's no surprise to anyone. the industry oh yes oh yes yes no I am definitely a way out and despite some obvious red flags, five people were willing to accept extraordinary risks to see the ruins of the Titanic and now they have joined the exclusive club that fascinated them so much and there is no doubt that they knew this was dangerous, they signed liability waivers warning them that the trip could expose them to death now, as many people assumed that everyone who paid to take the trip signed a liability waiver with a choice of law Ocean Clause The gate waiver that passengers were required to sign says disputes would be governed by Bahamian law.

Citation any dispute relating to the operation or this release will be governed by the laws of the Bahamas. Now the Bahamian judicial system is based. under English common law and whether families can sue depends on how the country handles liability exemptions. The language of the waiver makes clear that participants are engaged in an activity that could result in death. Citing that this boat will be subject to extreme pressure and any failure of the vessel while I am on board could cause serious injury or death reveals that the Titan quote has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and may be constructed from materials that are not They have been widely used in human-occupied submersibles.

The exemption says the support vehicles are also not designed for passengers and could become more dangerous in rough seas and the exemption says these risks cannot be eliminated. Quote I understand that such risks simply cannot be eliminated from any trade. Risks include, but are not limited to, loss of balance, slips and falls. Deck, especially in adverse weather conditions, damage from falling objects on non-passenger vessels, drowning and submersible malfunction or failure resulting in death or serious injury and participants had to acknowledge the statement as a condition of listing of the trip by signing this document. I acknowledge that if I am killed, injured, or suffer property damage during my participation in the Expedition, a court of law may determine that I have waived my right to now maintain a lawsuit in the U.S.

The liability waivers only cover negligence. common if a company acts constitutes gross negligence or intentional harm, the disclaimer simply does not apply and here ordinary negligence encompasses errors due to general care or incompetence simply to maintain industry standards, in contrast, gross negligence occurs When someone intentionally fails to use reasonable care to ensure someone's safety for there to be gross negligence it is necessary to show that the defendant was more than just careless he was reckless and engaged in behavior that might even appear deliberate now the hallmark of gross negligence is that the defendant showed a complete lack of care and disregard for the safety of others and here that is definitely a distinct possibility, we will talk about this in detail later, but here deep sea exploration specialist Rob McCollum told Rush writing before the disaster that sounded just like the creators of the Titanic quote. in your race to the Titanic you are mirroring that famous scream she is unsinkable Rush emailed back saying: We have heard unfounded cries that you are going to kill someone far too often.

I take this as a serious personal insult, but McCollum responded by rushing back in March 2018 by saying, "I think you're potentially putting yourself and your clients in a dangerous dynamic that you knew you were right and that you were going to be right so clearly that by At least one person thought Rush had a complete disregard for the safety of Other people thought that was a view shared by David Lockridge, a former employee of Ocean Gate and members of the Marine Technology Society and in considering whether there was gross negligence, a court considers whether a rational person in the same situation would have known that there was foreseeable damage and witnesses say that in the years after Lockridge and McCullum is

sued

their warnings, the Titan showed signs of poor design. that it was struck by lightning in 2018.

Rush said the lightning damaged 70 of its internal systems forcing the company to delay a planned trip to the Titanic and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Lightning can do strange things. That set back our tests, yes, and we ended up having to cancel them in 2018. Carl Stanley took a trip aboard the Titan in 2019 and reported hearing creaking noises in the hull, and after the trip, Stanley emailed Rush with his concern that the carbon fiber hull could not withstand deep dives; in fact, he wrote that during his voyage, quote it sounded like a defect in an area that was acted upon by tremendous pressures and was crushed and damaged in 2020, the hull had to be rebuilt due to cyclic fatigue which reduced its mortality rate to only 10,000 feet, which was far below what was needed to reach the Titanic, and both Lockridge and McCullum thought the window was a big mistake because it would be exposed to about 6,000 pounds per square inch of water pressure, which which is equivalent to about two tons of water at that depth.

However, in the summer of 2021, Rush told YouTuber Alan Estrada that the window was made of plexiglass and that he was comfortable with that because it was seven inches thick and weighs 80 pounds and acrylic is great because before it crack or fail, it begins to creak. Then you'll get a big warning if it's going to fail and I'll let my real engineering friend explain to you why this is Bonkers. An acoustic monitoring system like this is similar to setting up a camera to warn you that thunder is coming and you will see the lightning before the Thunder, but the time between them is minimal, so if the window couldn't withstand the pressure and people on the sub they could hear the window breaking, it was probably too late, the entire sub was at risk of imploding before it could surface and several former Titan passengers said they thought it was completely unsafe.

One passenger said that during the Titan's descents and descent a fluorescent bar was used instead of lights to save energy. He compared the dips to writing in a car while driving while intoxicated. into the ocean watched by a video game controller and former passenger Arthur Loibel said that on his 2021 voyage the stabilization tube bracket, which is what actually balances the Tor submarine, was hastily reattached with zip ties. Simpson writer Mike Reese said communication failures occurred on the three dives he made in 2022, but the problems continued in 2022 as well, the Titan lost control and began spinning in circles at the bottom of the Atlantic when it was just 3100 meters from the wreckage of the Titanic and something happened. to the thrusters that made the Titan unable to move forward or backward and this Herring moment was captured in a BBC documentary.

Am I spinning? Yeah, oh my God, and Scott says oh no, we have a problem. He was thinking we won't make it. We can't go anywhere but wander around. YouTuber Jay Kohler took a trip on the Titan just days before Doom went off and said the communications system went down during a routine test dive. The trip was canceled due to weather, but Kohler was sorry. As if the ship would have imploded if the dive had taken place, one of the passengers who died in the Titanic disaster was Paul Enrique, who was an expert on the Titanic, he had worked closely with the organization that manages the Titanic wreck site. and Jessica Sanders, who heads the Titanic organization, said she regretted giving Nargie Olay the green light to participate in the expedition.

She said Russia had told potential passengers that the Titan submarine was much safer than flying in a helicopter or even diving or even crossing the street and keep that in mind here. that there is a major conflict between what the waiver said about the Expedition being dangerous and deadly and what Rush confidently told potential passengers. Gross negligence means that the person has fallen so far below a reasonable standard of care that his actions are considered reckless or even deliberate. So it's legally acceptable to engage in dangerous activities, that doesn't mean someone can't ignore obvious risks, so if Bohemian law upholds liability waivers, families are likely to pursue litigation in their respective countries, regardless. say the choice of law provision. but that doesn't mean this would be an easy case to make because courts in many jurisdictions tend to uphold liability waivers if they are specific and this one was very specific as a general rule.

Claus' limitations of liability are valid and enforceable under common law unless they violate public policy or the injury was the result of intentional or wanton conduct on the part of the defendant. Some jurisdictions have legal exceptions to this general principle. Generally, a pre-injury release will only apply if clear, unobtrusive language explicitly states the intent. To release the provider from liability for harm caused by that party's own conduct or negligence, each jurisdiction applies different factors when evaluating a public policy exception, but most of them focus on two things: whether the terms of the waiver are clear and unambiguous, then a court first considers whether the released party is providing a need or other essential service and, second, whether the agreement is inherently fair and not unconscionable.

Risky recreational activities like skydiving or scuba diving are generally not essential public necessities or services, so when it comes to the first factor, courts tend to favor released parties when it comes to the second factor: whether the waiver is intrinsically fair Courts weigh the parties' respective bargaining powers whether one party had more influence than the other whether the injured party was forced into inherently risky behavior whether the owner or operator withheld passenger information, did the passengers understand How dangerous would the trip be? Typically, liability waivers are presented to something that you have to sign or else you cannot participate in that activity.

Some courts find this problematic because it is a take-it-or-leave-it proposition. and the participant does not have the ability to bargain, but even more courts conclude that if a person voluntarily participates in an extreme activity, unequal bargaining power will not actually invalidate the waiver, so, for example, courts have concluded that Rafting and skydiving are both personal choices and not essential services, so there is no real negotiation. Advantage: You can't actually force a person to engage in those particular activities, although there are courts that see it differently: the Oregon Supreme Court, for example, found that an unambiguous waiver signed by a plaintiff was prejudiced in a snowboard accident violated public policy, the snowboarder could have avoided all risks by not using the defense facilities, but the court still found that the resort owner was in a superior bargaining position because the plaintiff had not cited any significant alternative for the defendants to take. or leave him fit if he wanted to participate in downhill snowboarding, although that is a minority position.

Now the thing about devastating injuries and catastrophic events is that they can occur at any time and often without warning, so if you or a loved one is seriously injured in an underwater accident or more likely a car accident or a medical malpractice accident or anything else you can call my law firm the Eagle team we can help a free consultation is just a call away and the link is in the description now back to the shenanigans of the submarine. although in aInteresting twist of fate, attorney David Concannon was scheduled to be on the Ocean Gate expedition, but actually canceled due to a client matter.

Canon is an experienced diver who had been on the Titanic before and is listed as an advisor to Ocean Gate. He also has experience suing companies that engage in dangerous underwater operations even when the plaintiff signed liability waivers and Kincannon actually settles the case against a retail store. diving and the professional association of diving instructors or Patty even though the divers signed a liability waiver and that shows us how Ocean Gate could be liable if the applicable law was similar to Montana's negligence law when Linnea Mills died in After a diving accident in Glacier Park in 2020, her family

sued

the Gull Drive dive shop and Patty for negligence, wrongful death and infliction of emotional distress.

Mills was 18 when she enrolled in an advanced diving class. The class was supposed to cover situations like high altitude diving and cold water dry suit diving; However, the instructors did not have a permit for the dive that required place in the National Park after the park closed, the dive shop instructors were certified by Patty, but did not have much experience in the diving situations that were encountered. They were supposed to teach and the instructors went ahead with the dive without checking the equipment they gave Mills. a dry suit without an inflated nose and also had a regulator not suitable for cold water use a GoPro video from one of the Other students showed Mills struggling with the pressure of his suit when he was 60 feet deep and the video revealed that Mills could not breathe and had too much weight on her to ascend.

Mills was crushed by the pressure of the water and this was not the case. t Gull dive's first death in 2019, geldive rented diving equipment to a person not certified to dive and the man drowned immediately upon entering the water gold dive and Paddy argued that the disclaimer Mills signed absolved them of liability, However, a judge disagreed with Montana's law. allowed exemptions and waivers to be enforceable except where there was gross negligence or defective equipment, those things cannot be waived because the Montana law citation does not preclude an action based on the provider's negligence if the injury, death or damage are not the result of an inherent risk of these sports or recreational opportunities when the judge ruled that the case should go to trial, the defendant settled but, of course, the Ocean Gate disaster did not take place on a lake in Montana, took place in the middle of the Atlantic and when a passenger or seat worker dies aboard a ship, family members can file a lawsuit under the provisions of the death on the high seas law known as Dosa, which applies to cases involving vessels and aircraft that go beyond the limit of three nautical miles off the coast. of the United States and its territories, a plaintiff has a cause of action if the maritime worker died due to an unseaworthy vessel or other demonstrable negligence on the part of the shipowner, the vessel in question must have been involved in what which could be recognized as a maritime activity and in addition to maritime employees, Dosa also covers the civil passages of a maritime vessel to succeed in a dose.

The plaintiff has to prove that the vessel was unseaworthy and a plaintiff can prove a lack of seaworthiness if the vessel had significant mechanical defects or was incapable of manually handling the situation such vessels could reasonably be expected to encounter while in seaworthiness. sea, a plaintiff can also demonstrate unjustified worth if the vessel owner behaved negligently in relation to his responsibilities as a vessel owner and here the facts suggest that Ocean Gate may have fulfilled its duty to provide a vessel seaworthy for crew and passengers When Rush was developing the Titan it started with an existing ship called Cyclops that was built with engineers from the University of Washington, the engineers used an offline ship. -Branded PlayStation 3 controller to power the submarine;

However, Cyclops 1 was only built to withstand depths of 500 meters; However, Rush decided to retain most of the Cyclops design elements for the Titan, but he designed it to go eight times deeper when Rob McCollum visited the company. A store in Washington thought the PlayStation controller was a ridiculous quote and now you have the hand controller talking to a Wi-Fi unit that's talking to a black box that's talking to the underwater thrusters, there were multiple points of failure. Rush said that everything com worked with Bluetooth and Rush ignored all the comments and, in particular, decided that the Titan's cylindrical midsection would be made of carbon fiber instead of titanium.

Carbon fiber is a great material, it's better than titanium, it's better than a lot of other materials. Titan was completed in 2018, but experts were concerned whether the submarine could withstand the rigors of deep-sea exploration. My friend at Real Engineering explained why carbon fiber was a problem. Chosen carbon fiber. Composites are not really known for their compressive strength, they perform better. in tension ideal for aircraft that are pressurized from the inside where the pressure within the fuselage works to expand the circular cross section putting the fibers in tension for a submarine the pressure will work to compress the hull placing the fibers primarily in compression, this is set immediately It set off alarm bells in my mind when I heard about the missing submarine, you should watch the rest of the real engineering video.

It's really unbelievable, but he explains that carbon fiber is great for buoyancy, as Rush thought this would help the submarine. They float directly to the surface, while steel and titanium hulls require layers of foam, but Rush wanted to avoid layers of foam to reduce costs. This is where things get iffy. Ocean Gate had no idea where the task was or wasn't and we know this because they admitted as much in their own blog post justifying their decision not to test the vehicle with a regulatory body. Ocean Gate's former director of marine operations, David Lockridge, wrote a report concluding that the ship needed further testing and emphasized the potential dangers to the passengers of the When the submersible reached extreme depths, Lockridge thought the fiberglass hull Carbon would break down after repeated immersions.

Lockridge met with Rush and other company executives and raised his concerns and also stated that the Titan had other major design flaws, for example, the viewing window. It was only certified to work at depths of up to 1,300 meters and to reach the Titanic the Titan would have to dive 4,000 meters below the ocean surface and there are private agencies that expect and certify submersibles but Lockridge said Ocean Gate did not want to pay for independent certifications , the company fired Lockridge and then sued him for revealing confidential information. Ocean Gate said that Lockridge was not an engineer and that the company's own testing of the entire endurance was better than the independent testing that Lockridge had recommended, but Lockridge was not the only voice sounding an alarm about the Titan.

The Titan's design director, James Cameron, designed submersibles himself and visited the Titanic many times. He said the Titan's carbon fiber construction was fundamentally flawed and that everyone in deep-sea exploration knew it. a mature art and many people in the community were very concerned about this submarine and several major players in the deep submergence engineering community even wrote letters to the company saying that what they were doing was too experimental to carry passengers and that it needed be certified and so on and a few months after Lockridge was fired, 38 members of the Marine Technology Society's Manned Underwater Vehicle Committee wrote Rush a letter stating that, in their unanimous opinion, he was misleading the public and risking a catastrophic result.

Quote from the marketing material he announces that the Titan design will meet or exceed dnv GL safety standards, but it does not appear that Ocean Gate intends to follow dnvgl class rules. their representations, at a minimum, are misleading to the public and violate an industry-wide professional standard. code of conduct that we all strive to uphold now, obviously this is an incredibly damning letter. Lawyers bringing malpractice suits have to prove that the defendant failed to follow the ordinary standard of care or, worse yet, knowingly failed to follow a standard of care, and usually that means hiring an expert witness in the field who can articulate the norms of an industry and evaluate whether the defendant's conduct met those norms and in this case we have experts in the field who say that the Titan did not live up to industry standards before the accident even occurred and experts concluded that Rush needed to start with a prototype that would be validated by third parties to protect all of these submersible occupants and in a 2019 blog post, Ocean Gate said it cited an external entity to catch up on each innovation before being tested in the real world is anathema to Rapid Innovation and Rush told Smithsonian Magazine that the industry was obscenely safe because it has all these regulations, but it also hasn't innovated and grown because they have all these regulations, so while it's At first glance, this seems like the kind of thing that would be covered by the death on the high seas law;

In reality, it is more complicated than that because it is not perfectly clear that the Titan was a ship for the purposes of the ACT and, ironically, Ocean Gate could be covered by the same exception for Dosa that White Star Line used to limit its exposure to the disaster of the Titanic, so let's go back to 1912, when the Titanic sank off the coast of Newfoundland on its maiden voyage, the luxury steamship was owned by the White Star Line. which boasted that it was virtually unsinkable, but as we all know, as the ship quickly set sail it hit an iceberg killing 1,517 passengers and it turned out that the ship had a design flaw: the wall separating the bulkheads extended only a few feet over the water.

Surviving family members sought compensation from the Wine Star Line, but the company had a legal trick up its sleeve: the Limitation Act of 1851, which was enacted to help prevent ship owners from going bankrupt. gives shipowners the right to preemptively file a claim in federal court before plaintiffs have a chance to sue them. The claim limits plaintiffs to the post-loss value of the vessel and its cargo if the vessel and cargo were completely lost in value. cannot be calculated in the Owner's Assets in 1915 a judge determined that White Star Line was not at fault and had no knowledge of the errors that led to the catastrophic loss and that meant they did not have to compensate the families for the deaths and since The accident was then considered the fault of the captain and crew of the Titanic, the company's liability was limited to the total of the passenger fares, the amount paid for cargo and salvage materials recovered from the wreck and the company reached A settlement with $664,000 to be divided among the survivors and the same exception to the Limitation Act could give Ocean Gate a way to avoid liability, since the post-Titan value is basically zero, but there is also another wrinkle in this law in 2019, a boat carrying 33 passengers and six crew members trapped. fire and sank off the coast of California, killing 34 people days after the ship sank, its owners filed a limitation action seeking to limit their liability to the value of the vessel, which was effectively zero.

In response, Congress enacted the Small Passenger Craft Act. which excludes certain small passenger vessels from the ability to limit their liability to the value of their vessel. This is an exception to the exception and these smaller vessels can now be held liable for any and all losses arising from a marine casualty and the ACT defines a small passenger ship as one that carries no more than 49 passengers on one domestic overnight trip and no more than 150 passengers on any trip other than a domestic overnight trip. The spva could apply to the Titan, but the law is new and has not yet been approved. tested in court and there are other open questions such as whether a submersible is considered a vessel for the purposes of the spva and whether US law would apply in the first place because there are also many jurisdictional questions.

USAand Canada have launched investigations. As for what happened to the Titan, however, it is unclear which country would have jurisdiction over the legal claims. Ocean Gate Expeditions, the company that owns and operates the Titan, is based in Everett Washington. The company closed its operations in Everett after the accident and the Titan was launched from a ship called Polar Prince that has a Canadian flag. The people on board the subversible were from England, Pakistan, France and the United States and, of course, the wreck is in the middle of the Atlantic. Now the United States Coast Guard regulates the transportation of passengers in submersibles. and submersibles with fewer than six passengers have not been subject to inspection, which is probably why the Stockton Russia submarine was carrying only five people.

US Regulations State Citation Due to the unique design and operating characteristics, as well as the inherent dangers of underwater operation, an uninspected submersible may be permitted in US passenger operations only if it is designed and built to a recognized industry standard, meaning it is illegal to transport passengers on an experimental submarine. Rush classified the passengers as mission specialists and classified their $250,000 fare as a donation to evade the implication that they were just passengers purchasing tickets, but industry experts knew that Stockton was trying to evade these regulations. William Conan is one of the experts who signed a letter urging Stockton to hurry up to follow the rules.

What they were doing for tourism would not be allowed. in US waters the Coast Guard wouldn't allow it, they wouldn't allow him to work in British coastal waters because it would have required him to be certified, same thing in Canada and then it turns out they operated in international waters where no Coast Guard has jurisdiction. Well, you found two loopholes and let's just say it wasn't very smart, and although the Titan was developed and built in Washington state, the New Yorker reported that the company's legal documents said the submarine would be owned by a Bahamian entity. and it would be recorded. in the Bahamas and will operate exclusively out of the territorial waters of the United States and at this time, although we know there will be many lawsuits, we do not know who will have jurisdiction over the insurance status of the Titan or the passengers and we do not know if the exemption that signed will be enforceable or not, but one thing is for sure, Stockton Rush really should have improved his math and science skills, which he can do with today's sponsor, brilliant because brilliant he is.

The best way to learn mathematics and computer science interactively. Brillante is an online learning platform for Stem that replaces lecture videos with hands-on interactive lessons. It's for curious students, both young and old, professional and inexperienced, and you can quickly learn how to succeed in your high school. or college math courses or just learning things you always wanted to learn brilliantly helps you achieve your goals, whether you are a student or a professional looking to get ahead, for example, capable. Their new How Technology Works course teaches you the inner workings of everyday technology, from video compression, GPS to computer memory, and another of my favorite courses has to do with logic Brilliant's Logic Courses They cover liar's and truth riddles logical fallacies machine logic and even some strategic game theory Logic is, of course, a critical skill that lawyers need every day and Brilliant allows you to learn by doing rather than by listening to hours of boring lectures, everything is interactive and fun, you can sign up and start learning for free today by visiting shiny.org legaleagle or clicking the link that is on the screen right now or below in the description, if you click that link get a 30 day free trial and the first 200 people to sign up will get 20 off your annual subscription, so clicking the link below will get you a 30 day free trial and 20 off your annual subscription to shiny after that click. at this link here for more information on legal eagle or see you in court