MY FPL GAMEWEEK 35 WILDCARD GUIDE | GW35 WILDCARD TEAM! | Fantasy Premier League Tips 2023/24

Hello everyone here, FP Raptor and welcome back to another video on my YouTube channel. In today's video, we have my complete Wild Card Draft from game week 35. Anyone who has the active chip this week, I hope this video is very useful for you, but even if you have I don't have the active chip. Hopefully you can still win something and it helps you navigate the game. We're 35 to 38. If you enjoy today's video, hit the like button and if you're new here, be sure to subscribe too, but without further ado. Ado, let's get into it, so I thought a helpful starting point would be to simply refresh our memories on what the upcoming games are for the Final Four game weeks of the season.

There are only four weeks left in the game. Now I get a little excited about the group. of the season, this has been a very difficult season for me in FPL and I know that you will see how it is, so you will see 45k above my head, which is not a terrible range, but then I had 3 million. Eighth week of play and I've found it very difficult this year, but I still feel excited and I still don't want the season to end, but focusing specifically on the wild card, you have four weeks now and one of the limitations I guess. was that playing your wild card late you only have four weeks, but I guess you could turn that around and say now you can play a wild card with only four weeks in mind, you have two weeks of double play that you can attack In the matches you can think about which

team

s have things to play for and which players are being rotated and you can choose the best

team

to finish the season because in my position I come out with cards in week 30 and I have three or four injuries.

I have players who are single game weekly players at risk of rotation for double game week 37, so my team is looking a bit of a mess, so this is definitely the time where, if you've been patient and have kept your

wildcard

, you can finally reach the majority and hopefully win your mini-

league

s, so to remember the matches, week 35 and week 37 are the two remaining doubles, but remember that week 35 is just one week double for two teams, so Chelsea and Spurs double in week 35. Chelsea have Villa and Spurs and then Spurs have Arsenal and Chelsea, so neither of them have particularly good doubles and Spurs in particular are not good because one of their games is against Arsenal, but the reason why a lot of people and I would probably suggest doing something A similar load of Chelsea and Spurs players in their game with 35 wild cards is because they also double up on 37, so the only two teams with two more double game weeks this season are Chelsea and Spurs and therefore although they are not the best games.

At least you're getting extra appearance points from these players and you never know what could happen in a single game. That said, as I'll discuss a little later, I don't think you have to go for six. I will see a lot of content creators and people suggesting that you should go for six because they have additional matches that we have seen in the past. Extra games don't always equal more points, as it often is and to be honest it usually is, but not necessarily if there is another player who has one or two fewer games but you think is significantly better, maybe go for that one. path, but I think Chelsea and Spurs should definitely take up at least three or four places in your

wildcard

just due to the sheer number of games and you would say that overall Chelsea's games are a little stronger than Spurs' games , after that you have four more teams doubling at 37, which are Brighton and Newcastle, Man City and Man United, so that's the six teams, including Chelsea. and Spurs Dublin 37 and I would say probably if you're raising the bank at 37 12 to 13 at least your players in your wild card should probably double up at 37 and if you're not raising the bank you're probably looking at a minimum of eight or nine because, obviously if you fill like nine or ten doublers and then have the rest of the single game players on your bench that works perfectly fine so I think that should be your rough reference point of how many doubles you want and if I look from match perspective who has the best remaining matches of the teams Double Fantasy Football Hub actually has it as Brighton because this is sorted by match difficulty, I'd say it's probably Newcastle.

I really like Newcastle. Sheffield United run of games Burnley a decent double against Brighton and Man United and then Brenford the problem is Newcastle are much stronger at home and they only have two home games left this season so good games against Manchester United Burley and Brenford are good games, but they're also away from home, which obviously isn't ideal after that, so I think it's probably Manchester United, so we're looking at Newcastle, sorry, so we're looking at Brighton and Man City , but to be honest, all four. Those teams have a pretty good schedule, so again, I think they should probably make up the bulk of your wild card.

Aside from that, I think there are a couple of interesting conversations to be had, the first being around teams that don't have a double left. weeks of play, but they have really strong individual matches, so I think there are some teams that stand out. Nottingham Forest is a team that stands out for having quite good games, apart from week 35 against Manchester City, which is not ideal. Luton don't even have arguably good matches, but you probably won't be looking to fill up there. Brenford and Palace are two teams that I think have some pretty decent assets and in fact, in the weeks where you might need them, they don't have terrible games, I think Brenford in particular.

I wouldn't mind going for someone like a regulon or urmo in your draft if you just want to think you know what I think the doubles were some kind of cheat. I quite like the idea of ​​betting on a player who has good games. but maybe not necessarily double. I doubt many people in the wild card will go for someone like a regon, but he could outperform some of these doublers because his games are really strong and he has some attacking threat, the only other two teams that do deserve it. Some argument is that Arsenal and Liverpool are right because let's assume they win midweek, which I don't know.

I'm recording this on Monday night, so let's assume they win their midweek games if they go into game week 35 36, maybe getting closer to 37, they're still in the title race, or at least fighting each other, They will have to do their best and it may all come down to goal difference. I imagine a lot of people in their wild card will be left without Arsenal, Liverpool and Liverpool and Arsenal would just make an absolute fuss and win three or four in every game and they might regret it, so I'm not going to sit here saying for a second that I'd be charged with Liverpool and I would ruin myself with a wild card.

I wouldn't, but let's say you're not a wild card and you're watching this, thanks for doing it, maybe keep those assets, it could be a good differential and I haven't seen a single wild card draft with Salah. and sacka, I'm not saying again that you have both, but could you absolutely have one so you don't rule out Liverpool and Arsenal as options, but you certainly don't want to load up, so just to summarize that before we move on to Looking at my short list and then the final team I think the two teams you should have at least three or four of are Chelsea and Spurs, the rest of the team would be mainly made up of Brighton Newcastle Man City and Man United probably with a specific focus on Newcastle and Man City and then , if you have a couple of places left, take a look at some of the other teams like Brenford who have good games but don't double up and then maybe consider having one, two or maybe. three assets from Arsenal and Liverpool so those are the next games now let's take a look at my short list so guys I did this for my week 30 wildcard and I found it very useful and you found it useful too, so I.

I've created a short list for players I would consider at each of the positions based on budget, mid-price and premium, so if you have really poor team value you can pick a lot from the budget section, this list is No It's exhaustive and what I mean by this is that I've probably missed some players, maybe deliberately, maybe I've just forgotten them, but these are the main players where I've created a few different variations and they're pretty much unique. Considering the players on these teams here, I'm sorry for this short list here so you can see that the list is not huge and I will tell you that when you get to my draft it's not the most exciting thing in the world and it might seem like a lot of your drafts and other drafts that you have seen in videos from different content creators, but I think there is a good reason for that and what you need to keep in mind is that a very, very small percentage of the player base still has their wild card left , so Playing the wild card is a big differential and choosing 11 very good players or 15 very good players is enough, you don't have to go crazy even if in your mini-

league

s you are 100 points behind and you feel like you have to leave. different I would almost guarantee that if you just assign the best optimal team as a wild card or at least a very good team, it will probably still be very different from those around you, unless they also have their wild card, so the list I have here He is friendly. of assuming a bench raise of 37, but if you're not raising a bench of 37, all that means is that you don't have to pick as many doublers correctly to be able to carry more of Liverpool Arsenal Brenford Palace, some of these other teams that also have Good games, but they don't double in 37, so I said it very briefly.

I'm going to go through the list and then show you the 15 that I would be selecting right now, but there's a lot of information that we're waiting on. around injuries also in midweek games, so the goal could definitely change. I don't actually see many budget options. You could go for a real budget option if you wanted, but I just don't see the value in doing it again, especially if you're on a bench booster, if you're not on a bench booster and you think a goalie will help you until the end of the season, then maybe you would do that and then maybe you could just say "I don't know." a keler or shikosha or someone on the bench, that's super cheap when we look at goalkeeper pairings.

If you are looking for reinforcements on the bench, I think the ideal is that you want two goalkeepers who double up, so the four I would choose between is Petrovic Onana. viio and Edison maybe Veran deserves to be here and now I'm seeing this. I think so, Veran probably deserves to be here and maybe the cheapest option you could go for. I really do not care. Bugan but I always worry that he can still get a game and if he gets that game in a double game with 37 then you will have lost all value in selecting him but most Brighton fans seem to think Ran is the braer acquaintance.

He is the other goalie who is not here simply because Pope is still expected to return before the end of the season if he is not. De Bravar is arguably better than all of these, but I've left them out for those reasons, so it's really between Petrovic. Onana VII and Edison. I would 100% have Onana and before you say this is a Man United bias, it's because the rest of the Man United team sucks, so for me when you pick a goalkeeper Onana averages something like five saves per 90 , it's absolutely crazy. because Manchester United are so bad and when I look at clean sheets they don't happen in many teams, so why not go for Onan who at least gives you some points to save in these games?

So I really like Onana and then I would do it. You'll probably pick a Chelsea or Spurs goalkeeper to partner with, Petrovic Vicario. It depends on you. Many people really want more Chelsea attackers. A lot of people won't trust Chelsea's defense, but I'd say you don't trust Spurs' defense either. but pairing him with one of those two makes a lot of sense and then you have Edison, you have Pford, there are several options here, just pick two goalies that you like and hopefully rotate pretty well on defense, I think. It really comes down to your attack so I'm not going to go over each defender in great detail because it all comes down to what points you have left because if you go for three Newcastle attackers, let's say you have Wilson, he's in Gordon, you I suggest you do it, then you won't have any place in defence, if you're just looking for a Newcastle attack, you have two places in Newcastle, same with Man United, let's say you have Gatán Fernández and Onano, then.

You don't have a Man United place so it's really up to you where you want to spread the players because you'll probably have a lot of triple UPS in this team but on the budget options Gusto if he's fit and available there are rumours. I still think that even though it's not a great option, it's pretty cheap and at least it has the matches. and the doubles go, if so, DoIt's out of season now, so I had to remove it from this list. Van is your cheapest route into the Spurs defense. I don't love it but you never know what you might get from him and at least he has the double double again Maguire will play all the remaining games for Man United this season because they are plagued by injuries but is he a great option?

Maybe it's not the same problem with Dow as well. I would say some of the best free kick defenders, sorry wildcard 35 is actually Newcastle's defense, but again, they have some really good attackers as well and their defense data hasn't been great this season, but burn them Fabian Sher and, if fit and available, Kier and Trippier could. "They are all very good options, so I would have at least a defender from Newcastle. You probably still have an option in defense if you want to go for a defender from Spurs. Pedro Porro is absolutely fine, he is quite expensive, although we don't know if he is a defender.

He'll be available again if you're in doubt, then you definitely don't want to go for a joint because really one of the doubles you want him for is this immediate double here if you lose him by 35 considering the match at 36 and then moving to 37. maybe he just doesn't. you need a Spurs defender at all and then the only Romanian players are, I mean, questionable, we'll start with Man City. My problem with Gardol now is that Man City has enough. I think they actually have it. Unless I'm wrong, I think they have a completely fit defense at the moment you have Walker di Stones and aangi vardal, all these D Rico Lewis, there are so many players who can play in that defense, I just don't.

I even think Vardal is all in now but if I had to pick a city defender it would probably still be him and I would still be very tempted but do you trust them to play every game and again if not? If you don't play every game, is it worth it? Why not go with someone like Gabrielle or CBA? Yes, they have one less game, but if the player you are picking who has an extra game rests in one of them or rotates Well, then they don't have an extra game, so I would have at least one Aral defender.

I really think there is justification for betting on a double Arsenal defense in the wild card. No, they're not great at 37, but they just keep that many. Clean sheet and they actually had two really good home games in the last four, so Gabriel and CA are absolutely good options, as is Ben, if you think he will start all the remaining games in midfield, I think There are a lot of really good players. budget options, you could comfortably choose four of these budget options in garro Palmer Gordon and gross. I just think some of them are a little bit better given the games, the doubles and the production, so Palmer and Gordon to me are probably pretty good options in the BTW, mid-priced options type.

Pascal Gross won't be in anyone's wild card draft if you want a cheeky pun. No, Brighton haven't been attacking well enough and Gross' data isn't perfect, but he's on penalties when Jiao Pedro isn't there. The pitch and also the matches are not terrible for Brighton and they have the double, so Pascal becomes an unabashed budget option if his team value is really low in the mid-price range. I think there are some good options but I think these are Also some of them are quite unreliable this season so start Richison only if he is fully fit and I would say if Rison is fully fit he doesn't start every games, so I don't love Richison, but if he gets the nod, like he's definitely fit and training with the whole team.

I think Richardon goes back to that starting 11 and starts most of his games, but he starts all of his remaining games. I can't see it, so maybe it's not the best option. Madison will start everyone. He's left in the game, but he's been subbed early several times and his appointment hasn't been good and he's not passing his vision test, so I look at Madison. It's fine as a choice, but is it better than some of these other options, like even the budget one? options Maybe I prefer Madison, so I'm not so sure about him. Phil Foden is an absolutely good choice, as is Kevin De Bruyne, by the way, the biggest differential you can have in the wildcard is to get KD B in your team's big game.

Kev I think he will finish the season well as long as Man City don't clinch the title before the start of the game with 37 you would expect him to play most of the remaining games and then in week 38 you can just sell him. for someone like Sacker or Salah if you don't have them in your wild card, so I think if you can include KD B and don't feel like you're sacrificing elsewhere, he could be the man to make Bruno Fernandez. Be very popular now he is also the man on the thumb. We'll talk about Bruno in more detail in the next section because he's a spoiler alert.

He's potentially on that team. I just think he's very reliable during the minutes. He is on penalties. His recent data has been good and the games are there, that's all with Bruno, nobody thinks that Manchester United is good, but Manchester United doesn't have to be good for Bruno to get a gap that we saw against Centry . Manchester United were not very good, especially in the second half, but Fernández. I still have a double digit hle, which we would have gotten a double digit H in FPL, so Fernandez is a good option and then sacka and Salah, I mean it's really up to you, do you go for sacka, do you go for sacka? by sacka?

Salah, do you opt for? It's not really up to you either, but I think there's justification for going with one because I think it will be a differential on your wild card because most will probably stumble on both, also hanging on Manon, an obvious choice given the positions in the attack. I think two of them make more sense than the others, which is Harand and Eak, and again we will discuss them more in the next section. Who you partner with is really up to you, but I think Jiao Pedro Holland and Jackson did everything very well.

Very good options, you could justify having them all, the one that is not on this list, everyone will say how come it is not on the list. It's Olle Watkins, the matches aren't there, but if you're not interested in the matches and you just say yes. That's good, just pick Ole Watkins because he'll probably outperform Jia Pedro Hland and Jackson, even a Salanki could do well too, but I think when you look at that third and final spot, he'd need some match-based pumping. So I've talked about those players for too long. I said I'd do it a little faster.

Now let's move on to my actual draft and look at the 15 that as of Monday night I'm currently selecting. Guys, I'll walk you through the team position by position, but since I just talked about some of the players, this part won't be as long as my normal team selection video, so I'll just fly by. through them and maybe just add a little bit of detail for each player as to why they are there. Onan, I spoke solely for Man United's saves. I'm fully aware of that, but I would have one or two United assets. because of the matches because of the extra match as well and Onana is good for FPL if you look he is one of the highest scoring Guardians this season so this is not a man love thing it is just from an FPL perspective that definitely you could do worse. and if he keeps a clean sheet, he will give you a minimum of eight or nine points most of the time, he will give you 10 or 11 at the moment because Manchester United concede 30 shots a game, so he probably won't give you get. any clean sheet, but if he makes you laugh because you will get a lot of points.

I have Cario here mainly because if I don't have Cario, I literally only have one Spurs asset that you can I don't see defenders, only one of the attackers who is hanging, Manon, so it feels ridiculous to do a double double with only one Spurs' asset and, in reality, all the goalkeepers are not particularly good. The buan you could put there, but the buan no. Vicario doesn't make many saves either, by the way, but at least Vicario has an extra game and also maybe with some injuries on that Spurs team, maybe they give up more shots and he makes more saves, I really don't like it at all of that.

By the way, you could go with goalies like David Ryer, but Ryer doesn't make any saves without the extra game. He has a very low ceiling, so I think with Vicario it's a process of elimination. I don't like any of them if I received information that De Brava was going to be eliminated for the rest of the season. I think De Bravar is a very good option if Pope suddenly comes back for 36, maybe you could pick Pope in your wildcard game Onana at 35 and if you have To play Onana, play him at 36, you really need to use the goalkeeper from Newcastle because you've got Onana actually for 37 for that potential boost on the bench so yeah I think those will be the two by the way this assumes you are. in some kind of bench boost 37, if you're not, you can draft more players from a single game week in game week 37, the back five is very much up in the air and like I said this depends on several pieces of injury information coming in, but Gusto is there if there is a question about an injury or he is completely ruled out.

I would go with petravic and probably porro, but only if porro is obviously licensed and we don't know that yet at this point, so Vicario Gusto could be porro and Petrovic. I would probably try to have one of each again due to Newcastle's extra games defensively. I think you could say that De Brava Pope could be justified in sharing trippier burn all these different options but there are good attackers too so I've only got one at the moment and only due to the fact that we know he's fit at the moment , Fabian Sher is there, if Trippier is almost available, he is confirmed to be fit.

I would be very tempted to have Kieran Trippier. I mean this draft for me. Based on my team value, I have 3.1 in the bank, so you have the money to go there if you want and I think he is a very, very shameless differential in the wild card, but right now I only have Fabian sh, if you're really struggling on budget, just go for Dan, but move on to Let's do the next van devils, the next van devils is there just because I don't like any of the Defenders in the wild card, you could dunk if you wanted. to sprinkle the money a bit more but to be honest attacking dunks because he hasn't been much better than van heex this season, if at all, i think van heex could be even better. van hex is also pretty decent for erections, so I don't think so. dunk that gives you a lot more, you could go with a Spurs defender, absolutely van heck, it could be van Deen or porro.

I don't particularly love it, you could go for another Arsenal defender but would I like to reinforce Arsenal's double defense against the united man at 37 maybe one feels good but I wouldn't like to double him so it's just a process of elimination again. You could go for Dow, by the way, I'm not triple Man United so Dow can step into that Van Heck spot, but double Man United. The defense just isn't up to par at the moment, they are that bad, so Vanc is just there just because he is stingy and you might need the money, maybe in game week 308 to potentially move on to Salah, that money could prove useful, so that's the only reason it's there. there at the moment I have gardio here but as I said in the previous section I don't like this at all and I'm wondering if again if porro fits, if porro and Edison could be better than Vicario and vardal.

I just don't think Vardal starts every game, maybe a Walker or a Diaz does or you think Stones or a Ki gets more minutes. I honestly have no idea, but if Gardio doesn't start every game, it's not ideal. I guess it's the only game you need. For starters, you don't need to play him in week 35, it would be nice to play him in the game at 36, but it's not really necessary, he's only 37, so maybe if he rests at 35 or 36, that might be ideal . for you, but I don't think you can confirm the minutes of a Man City defender, but he is there again, honestly, if you are in the wildcard, you will know the feeling that the defenders are horrible at the moment, like he has a lot injuries on my defense, I'm not even sure who I want to bring in, which brings us to probably the easiest pick for a wild card on defense, which is Gabrielle, and I didn't think I'd ever say that because the games aren't great, no. he does double but Arsenal are just leagues ahead of every other defender or back and Gabrielle has a really decent attacking threat this season and dives into every corner so I think Gabrielle has to be there because there is no other good options like can you justify putting Dow ahead of Gabrielle for an extra match?

I don't think you can, so I think I would have at least one Arenal defender, but absolutely Vicario could be Ry van heet, could be Celra or could definitely be justified toWyatt with two Arenal defenders so that's the defence, it doesn't look very good but I expect the midfield and forward sections to make up for it so let's move on to the midfielders and I think the midfield will be the most important part of the wildcard . I think most of the wildcards you look at will have at least four of these and many of them will have five, but for good reason and this is the part where I urge you to take the best players if you think this is the best midfield. 5, which at the time of recording you will probably choose this Midfield 5.

I don't believe for a second that you are different because other wild cards have it because most of the people who are in that one are not in the Wild card, which again is the majority. People, you're not going to have all five, so having all five in combination is a differential and most of them justify it, so let's go over the easy son and Palmer options again. I'm recording this on Monday night, there are rumors. that Palmer is ill, you'll obviously see that if he plays against Arsenal on Tuesday and assuming he beats that fine, you'd have Palmer even if he doesn't play.

So apparently it's just a disease so I would have Palmer so son and Palmer would double double. the best players for each of their teams from an attacking perspective, you absolutely have them both, there is no reason to do without either, especially Palmer, he is so good and will probably be my captain this week, we will discuss captaincy a bit. However , later in the week, because I think there is justification for choosing my son. He likes these closer games against good opponents. Actually, sometimes it's where my son does the best he can, but anyway, Palmer and Son would definitely have, I think the next obvious player. but I'm seeing an increasing number go without it and I'll explain why because it makes sense but I hate that it's Gordon, you have to have Gordon right.

I don't understand this thought process without Gordon, well I get it. There are a couple of things, firstly, we talk about it in their next five games or their last five games, only two of them are at home to Newcastle and they are not the best they would have, like Burnley, United, Brenford, these . All the defenses are really weak, he is away and Gordon in particular is not very good away from home, maybe we will see this later in the week, but his data is much better at home. Gordon I think he's actually only been away from home twice. season, whereas at home he just carries every time, so yes, he plays Sheffield United at home this week, but I understand that it's not ideal for some of these games to be away from home.

He would even say that he would pick it up this week and sell it. next week, if you really don't want him you still have him for this game because you're a wild card this week, you can't not have Gordon against Sheffield United at home this week, but the other reason people may be potentially looking don't do it. Having Gordon is the combination so let's say you want triple Spurs well you're looking at this like I said and the only other Spurs asset you'd want is Maybe by but he's not fit and you don't want Vanen maybe . he's like Madison or Richardis or Brennan Johnson or even Teo Vera, but Maine in midfield would probably be.

I imagine Madison or Richison won't take out their son Palmer and a lot of people love Foden, but Bruno Fernandez. We'll discuss that in a second so maybe it comes down to Gordon and the thing is if you go for Madison Midfield that means you have a free place at Newcastle in defense so you could go for Kieran Trippier and Fabian Sher . Assuming Trippier is fit or Dan Burnam Fabian Sher opens that third Newcastle and I would say a Newcastle defender is probably better than Vanck and maybe Gardial, probably not Gabrielle but maybe even better than some of the goalkeepers they that you want to go for De Bravar or Pope, there's a lot of rambling, but I guess I understand the logic that if you remove Gordon and replace him with someone like Madison, not only does it give you another attack doubler for 35 and 37, but it also gives you an advantage free.

Newcastle is a place to play, but what that tells me is that you are replacing Gordon with an inferior asset. I think Gordon is better than angry this season, at least at the end of the season, so you're downgrading for me then. bringing in another defender from Newcastle when Newcastle is one of the best and worst defenses in the league. I know they've improved a little recently, but they're still not a good defense. We need to see another three or four games, which will be the end of this season, but until we can say that they are a good defense, nothing suggests that they will defend well this season, especially away from home, so I don't love it.

Gordon would be so comfortably encased in my wild card that he's not even funny. I'll see a lot of people go without him and I hope I've explained the reasoning because I guess it makes sense on paper, but I'm terrified I won't own Gordon. I'm even considering doing like Salah for Gordon this week I think he is very good against Sheffield United at home and in the away games against Burnley and Man United. Gordon really isn't good away from home but they are also very bad defenses so you never know so that's the parmeson and Gordon the other two.

There are spots available for De Bay. I don't think any of these are complete now. I don't think any of these are essential. Man City's elimination from the Champions League really helps here, obviously they have their FA Cup final coming up, but that shouldn't be a particularly difficult game and that won't affect Foden's minutes in 35 36, maybe even in 37, so I think Foden is a good choice. You imagine Pep Go will be absolutely packed until the league ends. Either for him or against him, probably for him, so Foden will probably start all the remaining games or at least have very good minutes in those games, so I think if they were still in the Champions League, you would go like that time by Foden. it's not the choice but i think now you don't have to go for him but i think it's very obvious and people will debate between foden and de bruyne foden just got better data, better threat, better overall expected target engagement and he it's cheaper and like I said you might need that money in the future, maybe you don't think about it now but let's say Van Heck gets injured and you were left like you had no money in the bank because you went for De Bruyne, what you do? so you think you have to go for a mediocre option where you would like to get closer to someone else so I think choosing foden instead of de bruyne to me makes a lot of sense but that doesn't mean you don't have Kevin De Bruyne because I think that this fifth place is correct.

I think his G and Palmer Foden's son makes more sense. That fifth place in Fernández. I don't think it has to be Fernandez, he will gain a lot of momentum. because he has come back quite a bit recently he has good games he is on penalties he has 90 minutes I love Bruno Fernandez I am a Man United fan I think he is a great option for FPL but all the content creators are starting to suggest him so I think "You will get on to the bandwagon, but don't feel like you have to get carried away with this because there are some good options outside of him, the first one is Kevin De Bruyne, because if you leave Gardio, maybe you choose someone or someone so you could go to fod and de. bruyer Harland, that could be very fruitful for you because City don't keep a clean sheet, their defenders rotate everywhere.

I expect de bruyer and foden to play most of the remaining Premier League games at least in the. period leading up to 37, maybe not in 38, I absolutely do, so you could go for if you have a similar team value to me. De bruyer over Fernandez in that Fernandez spot, you could go for garnacho if you have very little. team value and you're like Ross, I can't even afford this, so go for Grenache instead of Fernandez, which works pretty decent outside of that. I think it's Sacker and Salah now, unless you have great team value or have gone very cheap elsewhere you probably don't fit with Salah in this spot, but could you absolutely go for sacka?

I'm not suggesting that you necessarily increase the bench with sacka at 37, but you don't have to have sacka for the rest of the season. You could own him for a few game weeks and then at 37 look to move him to a potential doubler, but he's got Man United at 37, by the way, Man United don't defend very well so again he might even be fine. option, so I guess for me the four that I would say are locked in are Son Gord and Palmer Foden, unless we get some kind of update that one of them has serious doubts again.

I'm remembering this before most of the midweek football. but Fernandez is probably the one where I think there is garnacho de bruyer sacka Salah maybe even some other options that I haven't talked about here where I think you could mix them up a little bit. I'd love to know below if you're in The wild card is that you're locked in at five and if you don't feel like it's too much of a plate of 10, it's just a really good midfield 5, so the guys move to the front three and I think two These are relatively easy, but I'll go. through them first and then move on to the third and final place.

Erling Harland is here but he is marked and apparently a doubt for the Brighton game again. By the time you're watching this, you may already know if he's fit and available. And back to training I would say if Harland is fit he is worth having just because money shouldn't be an issue because you don't need Salah because he doesn't score doubles and the games aren't great. Same with Sacka. I think most people should have a good enough team value where Harland isn't really a sacrifice. I just don't know who to choose instead of him. There aren't enough good strikers to choose from, so for me, if he's fit and available, it's up to you.

I would even say that if he's out for a week, maybe you'll still pick him because you'll have a huge headache on the bench if you go with this team, you'll probably bench Phil Foden in the game at 35 if you go with this team. So Harlem being out might reduce your benching headache, which might be a decent thing if he's out beyond that, let's say it looks like it could be a few weeks, maybe you'll run out maybe what you do instead is just go for Julián Álvarez and leave the money in the bank to return to Harem because if Harland is available for 37 and City hasn't finished the league by then or no one has finished the league by then, then maybe that's when you just do Alvarez to Harland on a free transfer, so I don't think there are many situations where I would just cut Harand and spread the funds even further and decide against it unless it looks like he won't even come back for the rest of the season, but even then, like I said, you could just go for Julian Alvarez and just leave that money in the bank to then open up future opportunities for yourself, so I think I'd have Harland unless, like I said, injury Isak's long-term goal will be relatively easy, perhaps a little more difficult now because Callum Wilson is back. team training if he will be fit enough to start at 35.

I'm almost sure he won't be, so obviously we'll see midweek how many minutes he gets. By the way, because Newcastle has a match in the middle of the week, so let's see later, going into the game. at 35, if he's fit enough to start, I still think you've got him because what you have with Isak is a player in immense form, the future of the club assuming they can keep him because he's so young he looks to be in top form. well he has good momentum, it doesn't make much sense to me to drop isak and start wilson or move isak to the left which is another option, gordon to the right and then wilson in the middle, why would you move one of ? the Premier League top scorers who are scoring for fun down the left, it just doesn't make much sense, what I think we'll see is how we use this to protect ourselves for the rest of the time. the season to make sure he goes into the summer fully fit and that we don't suffer any other serious injuries, so I think it might mean that Isach is substituted for around 70 minutes a little bit more often, which isn't great, but again considering the lack of options elsewhere I still think it's a relatively easy pick in the wildcard now people are asking if you go for eak and Wilson maybe drop your Newcastle defender or Gordon and just go for the double in the Newcastle attack.

I have seen it. sometimes I don't hate him, but I still don't think Wilson will start more than one game the rest of the season, that's my prediction, so what you're doing is taking a bench player to serve you and finding him at 37 , maybe I'm just looking to start Wilson at G at 37, but for me I'd just go with Isaac Gordon and then share Pope Deka, the trippier, wherever you want to go with that third and final spot, so with your third forward and the fifth player of the team this is an optioneasy, because let's say you pick Petravic then you don't have a third place at Chelsea, maybe you could go for Petrovic and Gusto if by the way Gusto is out like I said so we will discuss all that but we have discussed it, but I think unless you're going to double Chelsea's defence, which doesn't mean I already have it in Petrovic and Gusto, but now on paper it doesn't look very good.

I have a free third place at Chelsea as long as he doesn't get that 10th yellow card and I should know if he gets a booking against Arsenal on Tuesday. I'm recording this on Monday night. If he gets booked against Arsenal, Jackson is not an option and I will discuss some other options in a second because he will be suspended for two games, which means he will miss the entire game, but assuming he doesn't pick up that yellow, the data from Jackson are, I mean, Harand Jackson. If you look at the underlying data on him, the only player that comes close to them is Darwin, who we're just not going to discuss here.

They are three of the best forwards in the league based on underlying data. Now Jackson and Harand haven't always converted. This season Jackson in particular has been quite frustrating since he was in the Prem but I still don't think Jackson is a bad choice and I think again there is who you choose plus there are other options but they certainly aren't. Great, for me Jackson would be back in, assuming he doesn't get that 10th yellow card if you don't like Jackson or let's say you have a third Chelsea somewhere else and you just don't want to triple it.

Chelsea Rasmus hland could be a decent shout because for all we say about Manchester United defensively, they usually still take at least eight to 10 shots per game and he will usually get a chance in the game. My concern with holand and the reason he's not here. I don't think Hyland's primary responsibility for this is going to seem crazy. I know I don't think he was given the sole responsibility of scoring goals. I think what is his task if you look at the games. he's dragging the defense all over the place he's an absolute runner his movement is very very good but it doesn't look like we're trying to find him we're not throwing a lot of crosses and overall when I watch him I feel like he's doing a lot of good runs that take defenders out of the way and make space for players like Garnacho Fernandez Anthony God I hate our team, whoever is available to exploit those spaces, if so, that's why I really think Garach has been really good recently thanks to Holland.

Running is huge, but from FPL's perspective you can see that his underlining data is really poor and I don't think he prefers it. I would rather have Jackson over hland assuming he is fit and uncontested. that tenth yellow the only thing I think you gain with Holland is that I think you have more minutes guaranteed I think there is a good chance that in one of these games no more than one I think it would only be one in which Jackson maybe starts one in the bench and maybe you get something like Sterling in the Force 9 or Palmer in the Force 9 and just give him a bit of a rest because he's played a lot of games and hasn't always been in the best shape. so there's a chance you won't play every game with it, but I still think it's worth the risk.

The only other option I can think of is that it is actually the player I have, which is J Pedro, if I were choosing new now and With all the money and transfers in the world, I don't know if I would choose JP, but it is still the Same option as last week when I brought him in, so maybe it's just because he blanked out on game week. 33 against Burnley maybe I'm like, oh, he blanked against Burnley. I don't want it because there is still good data, there are still penalties, it is still the same set of games.

I guess you just don't have the same entry point, just my entry point in 33 was Burnley, whereas now it's Bournemouth I think, and then they've got Villa, so it's not the perfect schedule, but it's more of an option. cheap if you don't want to go back to the Chelsea triple, Jiao Pedro, because you can go to the bench most weeks and if you need him, he's there, he's not a bad option, but I think for me that last place would be between Jackson Hy and J Pedro. I think I'd lean towards Jackson at this point, so that's #15 again.

I'm recording this. on Monday night, which means I don't have much information on the injury rotation, what happens in midweek games, this could change quite a bit, what I wouldn't change is that I would have City's treble at 100%, as either with Guardal Edison or De Bruyer. foden and Harland would have triple Newcastle and the non-negotiable for me would be Gordon and eak you just put the defender you want would probably have double or maybe triple Chelsea probably triple but double at least would have at least double Spurs here is Vicario and his son could end up being Pedro Porro if he is fit.

So I would have at least one, maybe two active men joined together, you can see Heron and Fernandez van heck also doubles and then I have Gabrielle in there too. because he's an elite defender, so what you have here, if I'm not mistaken, hopefully I'm not, is that you're 14 of 15 doubling the only player you have that doesn't get doubled in game week 35. Sorry on 37, I should say it's Gabrielle, but could you increase the bench with Gabrion? Could he keep a clean sheet or absolutely score a goal? And now you also have two free transfers. I do not recommend booking on transfers and it is a key piece.

Tip if you're still watching at this point, by the way, if you're still watching, like the video and make sure to subscribe. I really appreciate it, but I wouldn't book transfers for 36 and 37. I wouldn't say in 36 I'm going to do Gabriel this p in 37 I'm going to do this because I guarantee that in the next two weeks you will have problems like look just this week, your little dog is out of season. Gusto might be injured my friend Isil, like we have total chaos constantly in FPL so I would try to book zero transfers until maybe

gameweek

38 at most, maybe book one for 36 or 37, I think if you booked both transfers free. for 36 and 37 it is likely to go very badly and there is also a good chance that you want to take two free transfers to game 38 to buy the lights of sacka and Salah because they have really good games in 38. so the ideal is that anyway just do a transfer at 37 and you are executing the second one correctly.

I'll stop rambling there. I'm not on the wild bandwagon this week, but I've thought about this a bit, so I hope so. It's been helpful to you and let me know below how different this wild card is from your current draft, so guys, there you have it. This is my complete week 35 wild card

guide

. I hope it was helpful to you and if it was, please tear that apart. and if you're new here make sure to subscribe. I really appreciate it until next time, thank you so much for watching, bye.