Global cancer concerns

Well, a very warm welcome to this talk and a happy Good Friday, reflective and contemplative, as you will see, we are still using somewhat limited technology, in fact we are working in Australia with Professor Robert Clan and there will be more in the future. then in the next few days, hopefully, but there will be interesting news. I've been talking to Professor Angus Dal gich now to Professor clany um. Professor D gich has been one of the clearest minds in this pandemic and I was recently speaking to Angus alage. on the phone and we agreed to do an interview about this topic when I get home, but there is something I want to bring to your attention and it is an article again, this has all the references.

I'm going to give it my all for Angus dlish is a professor of oncology, one of the country's leading doctors, and he wrote this article. mRNA vaccines should be banned once and for all according to Professor Dow Gleich. Now let's see what his justification is for this and see if it makes sense now, he says this and we reported on this in some detail at the time and we recorded a video with Professor Daash about this at the end of last year. I reported that he was saying patients with melanoma, that's skin

cancer

, but of course it spreads. throughout the body, melanoma can kill you really very quickly.

I have seen patients die from melanoma in months, not years, but professor dich has kept his patients alive for 5 years, 10 years, 15, 20 years. I think it's a pretty remarkable success in oncology, so at the end of last year, Professor Dowle said he was seeing more melanoma reactivations as he saw melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster, which is the third injection, and it also says in this article that I am going to give you the reference for the The number of my affected patients has been increasing since then, so the

cancer

s of patients with stable melanoma reactivated after the booster.

Now, if Professor Dowle says this, this must be taken seriously and all we have to say is that there is no problem here is for the regulatory authorities to stand up and say. Professor D is wrong, there is no reactivation of melanoma after the vaccine booster doses wear off, so we know where we are so far. I haven't heard them say that, so other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world, including Australia and the United States. United States is one of the leading oncologists in the world, Professor Dow OB International Networks and has been contacted by colleagues in Australia and the United States and after the booster doses, these colleagues are reporting more lymphomas, now lymphoma is a cancer life-threatening lymphatic system.

You've probably heard of Hodgkins and non-Hodgkins lymphoma, so more lymphomas are reported to Professor Dlish, more leukemias are reported to Professor Dowl, a group of cancers that affect the blood, more kidney cancers are also reported and then the Professor Dow GLE says this, my Colo. Colleagues with rectal cancer report an epidemic of explosive cancers. Explosive cancers don't sound good, they refer to those that have multiple metastatic Li and other locations, so what happens very often is that the cancer starts in the colon and then spreads to the liver and of course, ideally would be to detect it when it's still in the colon and be able to correct it, get rid of it, treat it, hopefully, just with end opy, but if it has already spread to the liver, the prognosis is very grim and, if Professor Dlish I say it again , all it takes is for the regulatory authority to stand up and say, "You know what we've looked at." There is no increase in lymphomas.

There is no increase in leukemia. There is no increase in kidney cancer. There is no increase. There is no increase. in colorectal cancer and if there is, it is certainly not attributable to the covid vaccines, just stand up, say to be clear, it is not, I mean, if I were saying this and of course they could reasonably ignore me, but no I am the one who says this is one of the The world's leading oncologists say this and it is a question that needs to be answered if there is no problem here, say there is no problem, clear it up, we will all go home and start thinking about the infectious diseases and other problems that exist around the world. many, so there we are, um, more Act of melanoma reactivations, possible lymphomas, leukemia, kidney cancer, rectal color cancers that often present at a late stage, please regulators dismiss this, say that It's nonsense and reduce my anxiety levels now.

Professor D gleich has a good track record. He knew from the beginning that the SARS Corona 2 virus contained insertions indicating possible laboratory manipulation. He said from the beginning the vaccine did not stay at the injection site. He said that from the beginning there was batch variability and these alarms were ignored. deleted by regular messages and of course we now know that many of them have been supported by extensive scientific evidence and also talked about DNA contamination. Why are so many cancers happening now? Professor DL ​​addresses this topic. Cell suppression was his first likely question. The explanation for immune lymphocytes that recognize cancer and kill it at an early stage is that the problem, but now it says this, however, we must now also consider the integration of the SV Simon virus 40 DNA plasmid in the promotion of the development of cancer, so what we need now is for the regulatory authorities to stand up and say that there is no DNA contamination, the vaccines well, they don't say it, I don't think they say that because I'm fine, we know that they exist those that are made of E eoli. preparations at least, which is all of them, I think they are selling right now, so stand up and say you know what it is, there is no Simeon virus here sv40, this response promoter is just not there, you don't care about anything, so I will do that. wow pH, thank god for that, sorry, I thought we might have had a problem there, that's all you have to say, mhna FDA, just stand up and say that please, and then we can forget about this, like this so here we go, reports that the mRNA spike protein binds. p53, another cancer suppressor gene, is another possibility.

Now what we have here is we have genes that suppress cancer, reduce the mitotic rate and the rate of cell division. They are called cancer suppressor genes or oncosuppressor genes. There is also evidence that it can promote cancers that increase cell division, but Professor GLE is worried that the mRNA Spike protein will bind to cancer suppressor genes and prevent them from working properly, that is his fear again. Regulators just say no, you know what mRNA vaccine. The Spike protein does not bind to p53 or other cancer suppressor genes forget it, there is no problem here, but this is a question that needs to be answered.

Professor D GLE says this to recommend booster doses, as is currently the case, is nothing more or less than medical incompetence depending on the country you are in. Of course, there are no more ifs and buts, mRNA vaccines should be stopped and banned now, unless the regulators want to say, look, there is no problem here. Professor Dow is wrong, so we'll all go home and forget about it when we're done. I have been reassured up to that point, I am worried and from the feedback we are having so many cancers, especially in younger people. I am not going to name individual people, but we all know that this is in the news at the moment, just before we finish Eurostat.

According to the European statistics agency, circulatory diseases and cancer accounted for 54% of all deaths in the EU in the European Union in 2021, of course, unfortunately people die, so in 2021 there are 5.3 million deaths In the European Union, circulatory diseases are 1.7 million cancer, 1.4 million. were the two most common and of course we know that circulatory diseases have increased quite dramatically, at least in England in recent times, heart failure has increased especially rapidly or has a very high incidence, then other things, diseases respiratory, gastrointestinal diseases, all listed, of course, now on eurosat. in 2022 we report excess deaths April was 12% more than normal May was 7% more than normal June was 7% more than normal July was 16% more than normal we know this continued in 2023 now 2024 we In fact, we got the data from Eurostat for January overall for the European Union: there were 3.6% more deaths than we would expect above the reference value, but it does say this in January 2024, the highest excess mortality rates were in the Netherlands, 15.3% in January 2024, Denmark 11.5. % in January 2024 and Germany 99.9% in January 2024 now says that in January 2024 the excess mortality continued to vary now which countries do you think had lower values ​​Romania Bulgaria Hungary Lithuania Croatia Luxembourg Slovakia Poland Czech Republic did not have excess of deaths what what could There is a link here, so there is a very high excess deaths in these westernized countries and in the more eastern countries, a lower excess deaths.

Well, we have the Bradford Hill criteria to judge on that and we've talked about it in the past, so I'm worried. Netherlands excess deaths in January 2024 this continues 15.3% Denmark 11.5 Germany 9.9 continues it is a concern, we have to find out what is causing this well, to see that in Australia the Senate is going to investigate the causes of the excess deaths they are causing. There are no assumptions, they are only going to investigate the cause of the excess deaths. In my opinion this needs to happen in every country in the world and regulators need to squash angry Professor G's

concerns

and we await the response from him, so for now, thank you. you for looking