Free To Choose - Milton Friedman on The Welfare System (1978) | Thomas Sowell

After World War II, the New York City authorities retained the rental controls allegedly to help their poorest citizens, the intentions were good and the Bronx was a result of the 50 For this subsidized part of apartments for the

welfare

areas beyond the East River or the Government of the East City. Strange things happen. The idea that the government had to protect us became accepted during the terrible years of depression capitalism that was said that it had failed and that politicians were looking The problems of the day they met by the Government and was solved by the government that met by the Government and were solved to those who met the problems of depression of the problems of the problems.

Spending the measures that FDR and its associates discussed here are derived from a long line of experience. ancient. The

welfare

state had little effect on practice in the United States, but they had a great effect on intellectuals on campus as those who met here with FDR, the people who met here had little personal experience of the horrors of the horrors of depression, but they trust that they had the solution in their long discussions while they sat around this fire that tried to design programs to meet the problems of the worst depression in the history of the United States.

The moment when the intellectual climate had become one in which it was taken for granted that the Government had to play an important role in solving the problems by providing what was later called to the safety of the crib to the first priority of Roosevelt after its choice was to deal with mass unemployment that a public works program began the projects financed by the Government to build the roads of the highways of the highways and the administration of the national recovery that the National Recovery Administration was a review of the network industry industry. The Social Security Law and other measures were approved followed the unemployment benefits of the benefits of well -being distribution of surplus food with these measures, of course, the rules of the rules and the bureaucracy as familiar today as novel, so the government bureaucracy began to grow and has been growing since this is only a small part of the social empire today, their headquarters in Baltimore have the rooms of this size that are the ones with the Better intention that there are people with all these money with which people with the best intention that people with all these money. 50 years since Albany meetings have given the government more and more control over our lives in our income only in the state of New York, these government buildings host 11,000 bureaucrats that administer government programs that cost New York taxpayers 22 billion dollars at the federal level.

It has a throat defect and must connect to a breathing machine to survive the nights that it is an expensive treatment and you can expect the family to qualify for a medicaid subsidy, no, I do not get it because I am not eligible so that it is not eligible so that I, which I give myself a day of payment. Easier because of the fact that Mr. Brown knows that if he renounced his work as an ordered at the Harlem hospital, he would qualify for a government brochure and be better financially, it is a terrible pressure on him, but he is proud of the work he does here and is strong enough to resist the MR pressure.

Brown eh and you are completely dilated, so I'm here to take you to the birth room, try not to press, do you want to have a good sterile delivery MR? Brown has discovered the difficult way that well -being programs destroy the independent of an individual now that we have considered the well -being we went to see about the welfare application, but they told us that we were only eligible for five dollars a month and, and to receive these five dollars, we would have to collect the savings bonds of our son, and that it is not worth it.

The mother and children are better if the husband does not work or if the husband is not fair and this breaks so many poor families one of the saddest things is that many of the children whose parents are in well -being in turn will end up in the well -being trap when they grow in this public housing project in the three -quarters of the Bronx of the families of the families now receive well -being well -being payments. Brown wanted to stay away from this kind of thing for a very good reason that people who have welfare lose their human independence and their feeling of dignity, are subject to the dictates and whims of their well -being supervisor that they can tell them if they can live here or there if they can put in a phone with their lives, but they are treated as children who are not responsible adults and who are trapped in the

system

, maybe it is a job that is better.

It seems that they are better. Peral after a few months and perhaps six months or nine months before they can return to well -being and, as a result, it becomes a cycle of self -perpetuation instead of simply a temporary state of the things that things have gone even further in another place, this is a state of human housing, a public housing project in Manchester England, well, we are 3,000 mile same place to the same place, it is the same type of plane of miles away here. Garbage despite the fact that only graffiti was built seven or eight years ago the same feeling about the place of people who do not have much in impulse and energy because someone else is taking care of their daily needs because the State has deprived them of an incentive to find jobs to become responsible people to be the real support of themselves and their families during the last seven years Maureen Ramsay has had to buy food and their clothes for their family for their family of his home for his municipality from a family moment for his municipality from a moment of the family of his home.

Steve has not had a job every week, collects what is known in Britain as Social Security, the government takes care of him his wife and children, but accepting well -being payments means accepting the rules of those who give them my opinion anyway, anyway, you feel that you own you, since there is no other way to tell me that I have a job tomorrow. To do it because it is still desperate that you cannot fight against them. The work alone is these days that only around 45 pounds per week, it did not eat so that it is maintained below that you still end on Tata 9 pounds, it is good that it is working when it used to have the same thing that you know what I want to say that I cannot see the meaning, of course, it is quite correct, but it cannot pay him a job now that it is not his fault and that it is not guilty that it is the feeling that it is the feeling that it is the feeling that it is the feeling that it is the fault and that it is the feeling that it is the feeling that it is the feeling that it is the feeling that it is the guilt and that it does not achieve.

For the sake of his family, it is the fault of a

system

that takes away the incentive to get a job, but suppose it was cruel and simply removed welfare during the night. Charity may have to get help for the comas dining room for the equivalent again, I am not saying that it is desirable, pleasant, or something good, but it is nothing more than a real fact of what would happen, there is few doubts that I would find some way of making a living. In opposition to everything that the United States believes because the United States was based on a work ethic has a practice for work ethics and has said that this is what we want everyone to do the opportunity to have a job and in the United States everyone here has to register and make a full day at work, it is an attempt to make a real job, can I say a job as part of the American life and that we will help find a job so that you can get a job so that you can find a piece of work?

The work schemes are not executed under the Government's Integral Education and Training Law have a high abandonment rate and many apprentices end up return where they began in well -being, the men and women who administer located and similar programs, the officials of the Department of Health and Welfare Education, our dedicated people are good. The use is bad in two very different aspects in the first place, all these programs involve some people who spend the money of other people, our objectives that are determined by a third group of people who nobody spend the money of another person as carefully as he spends his own that no one has the same dedication to achieve the objectives of another person who shows when his own benefit follow They benefit from this beyond the programs that programs have a moral effect on people's moral fiber to people and that the objectives and people who benefit from this are beyond this, the programs have a moral effect on the moral fiber of people to people to people and people who are the people who benefit beyond this.

People who manage it instill a feeling of almost divine power for people who supposedly benefit it. That what the case thinks, which seems more important than the case, which seems more important than the case, which considers that it is more important than the case. He did a special investigation into the expense of the vast funds he manages. We have just obtained the Public Health Service Plan on reduced beds necessary in these tape reels that record each payment that all receptors that found evidence that an amazing and a half billion dollars had been lost due to the waste of fraud and the abuses in a year of the contractors of the contractors of the doctors of the hospitals of the hospital Teachers Huge boat of taxpayers' money is that we all want to have in our hands, it may be sure that we can all find very good reasons why we should be the ones who must spend the money of another person, someone or another present a good case for spending the taxpayers money to subsidize rentals in New York City, including the income of these apartments, the people who occupy these apartments pay something like $ 200 per month less than the market for the market for the market Subsidies of the subsidies of the people of the people of the people of the people who occupy those who occupy something like $ 200 per month less than the market income market and that the subsidies are of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people who occupy the people who occupy the market of $ 200 for less than the rent of the market and that the subsidies occur the rental of the rental of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the rent of the The rental of the rental of the rent.

Poor than people who live here, it is not unusual for this type of thing to happen when the government tries to do good with our money, look what happened in Chicago for most visitors, the immediate impression is of a rich prosperous bustling city, but like all the large cities of the United States, they have their problematic areas, the neighborhoods for the population of breeding breeding and the crime of the world of the world. Rebuilding the use of government funds under an urban renewal program should be an exhibition project that replaced a ruined area with an integrated community that controlled the expense of that money from the government, in fact it was my own university of Chicago, whichHe felt that his own existence threatened by the spread of the urban place and the money of the Government of Crimes were used to an area that contained many small stores, as well as families, as well as low -income families, once the area of ​​the crime centers was clear with the media myocardium, it was used with an area of ​​the city.

And commercial complexes, the blight had cleared here, but only to be transferred in another place in many cases, when the government manages great subsidies, while these funds do not end well serving directly to people and achieving the objectives that were the intention of the programs because the programs of the subsidy feed that the great government bureaucracy Joe Joe Joe. Pacificly, using government money when the government's funds were available, the Woodlawn organization obtained control, used them to build the typode Las Casas wanted low -altitude apartments like these, the planners and architects of the bureaucrats told them that it was uneven that only the high -height blocks worked, they were wrong.

Many people have this opinion that disadvantages if they have no idea what their problems are not a heart solving that external professionals do it and say that this is a ball that the exterior does not feel in their intestine in their institution of a woman with what a month ago and that it lives in a month of attention. You know in a deterioration of the construction fields that can find much better solutions than a bureaucrat, the intentions of this local community group are good, they want to rebuild the community, since the community wants the government, the money of the government, the money funds that the funds of the government always realize, the funds of the funds that the funds of the governmental have always allowed the organization of a complete area of ​​Chicage to sit.

Splendid Houses for Middle-Class Occupiers Very Expensive Protected by The Latest Security Systems All At The Taxpayers Expose In A Sense Twee Is Rapidly Becoming A MINI GOVERNMENT AT O OF Five Million Dollars A Year So We Are Large Large and Expanding Their Next is to redevelop this site and that's only the cruce Step in A 20-YEAR PLAN THAT WILL CAUSE 220 MILLION DOLLARS MOST OF IT COMING THE TAKENS That they made them economical for the owners to maintain their buildings, have moved and the vandals have moved to South Bronx is an area in which many of the people are in the well -being and when the crime rate is high, but all this could change a group of local people has begun to give up renewing these buildings to build new homes that become the sweat sweat principle, all this could change a group.

Only later they accepted a small Government subsidy how long you started working in this building four months ago in this building here and I tell you that what you are going to do is gartain the whole issue of starting there and well totally deduced and you will have to requern the roofs that work in a winter work summer. How many people? Do in the future and take it well, at first, it is difficult to show someone who in the next 3-4 years what will leave it cannot see it, the long-range shift that we will see in summary that they need money at this time in those 200 years, so we are sure that, we try to show them that it will happen, it is true that they now accept money from the government, but that we have achieved that we have achieved it to retain it to retain its original philosophy. better.

Street that gives us something to expect, they had their own apartment, they would take care of the area around them, they have a garden to have something they expect eagerly, they even leave well -being, it even gives them a job so that I can leave the world fair and have something of itself that itself, that everything that it is about itself because, while advising the government and does not feel, do not have that we do not have a job in which we are in the crime of ourselves. Are Sita workers paid by taxpayers, but this is not as useful as it seems that these fellows would A lot of time, since these people could use with the money that these people give the amount of money they are paying for workers who will now have a very expensive way, since a long time, since these people could use with the money that is in the money that is in the money that agrees now, is it very difficult?

To use their money, the problem is that you have a bureaucracy and government bureaucrats want to decide what to do, do not want It was done here. Feeling and that attitude will have a much healthier community here if it grows from the self -consistency of people such as the people we have been talking about at that time if it is a paternalistic company carried out by government civil officials and bureaucrats who have to plan on a large scale for other people who must find a way to give everyone in the well -being that has taken those who are taken briefly.

This is the idea that we must get rid of a large part of the welfare bureaucracy of the degrading rules that we must help people who are poorly poorly when giving money, what is the positive income tax that is entitled to a certain amount of personal exemptions and deductions and above that amount that pays taxes, but assumes that it does not have a negative income tax? Something that would still obtain a fraction of its unused exemptions and would end better as their profits increased the supplement to their income would become more and more small until their earnings match their exemptions at that time that it would break in which it would not break or if it did not receive a subsidy, it is not an ideal system and that we do not like.

Separation that tends to destroy the entire social fabric, would mean that week that we could take The motion, we stayed with the motion, we stay with a motion to a We Mothuts in the motion. With a worst of the worst results, we have become increasingly dependent on the government, we have delivered the power to the government that no one has taken us away, it is our expense of the monumental government that spends a lot of it evil little to the people to whom we would like to see the taxes on the burden. So we joined him while looking at the movie.

He had an increasing sensation of anger that this position did not recognize that the system that was being attacked was necessary in our capitalist

free

system that, by its own failure, produces poverty and, therefore, requires a government intervention in the interest of those people trapped in the poverty traps, so I was sitting and looked at the film and, as I heard the Dr. Friedman's statement excited me to the point as I said because only half of the story is said to really be a victim this time a system that the welfare system for the failure of other systems to operate for the sake of people, we obtain other reactions of that statement trying to do good with the money of other people who have not worked.

It grew in very different conditions during the period of capitalist failure during the period in which there was no such humanitarianism and when it was possible for people to live better and leave that poverty now, I did not exist, I slept in the fire getaways in Harlem, it would challenge anyone who did any part of the city of New York today in the United States, we have tried to avoid the well -being trap that was mentioned when they were mentioned by de capable and not aged and, therefore, we think that I have tried to close the welfare door to a good amount of categories within the population of the poor, who emphasized and that I have tried, and therefore, it is necessary that it has been tried, and that it has tried.

The perspective is that some, but not everything, what we could call welfare programs in general, have this very strong tape of benefits as it earns a little more money and that I suppose that I would like to highlight, since the main problem identified in the film, but it is not common to all and all the well -being programs that one might think when the family fails when the private sector fails to jobs at a work rate that does not have the test and does not have help. The system was created in the 30s to do exactly that when the private sector essentially failed, we have the development of a well -being system, it is not corrupted to society, it is taking what the institutions of society have left behind the family that break the economy that does not expand quickly enough. corrupting, but in fact, taking the remains and trying to help people live with dignity, so that the rot of society's fabric is not compatible, except that perhaps it supports it, that phrase is absolutely saying that it is talking about the failures of the other parts of society, which the well -being system and other types of government programs are making people fail in which they fail in which they fail in which they fail in which Since they receive the money and, for what will be successful, the moderate money is that the moderate money is the money that is taken to the school that is taken to the school that is taken to school.

They will give money to schools with low scores to the extent that the school improves their education, money is removed so that it is subsidizing people to fail in their own lives have become more dependent on brochures, we have expectations incorporated today about the quality of life. My expectations, my expectations will be to hire or to the extent that the Center for Advanced Studies was subsidizing my expectations a few years ago. I refused to work in UCLA for the salary of the full normal teacher. Why should I get the same money to be at the Center for Advanced Studies without hours without tasks and without class, we will observe another proposition in the case of Milton in the Insidious case in those who receive that they receive their promotion human independence and do not have children's classes?

And so, now, Doc Thompson, as former administrator of an important program, is that a great danger that is not a great danger of fact that assumes that people obtain in well -being are maintained in well -being and, therefore, have the result that DR. Friedman's statement issues the fact of the fact is that in our AFDC programs throughout the country, in particular, it was so true in New York, there is a postgraduate billing of the Welfare of AFDC. Look at people and what they do, the people who know that they are poor are not different from those of us who are not poor and their motivation for self -dependence and mobility on the economic scale are not different from what the reasons we have so that they do not let the system remember DR.

Friedman the welfare rights organizations that refused to let the system sculpt them, since it tried to make it become the policies around it and I agree completely, but the people who are poor in our welfare roles are not different from the rest of those who are not human beings and do not deserve all the sympathies and all the possibilities of making their own way, but they do not give them those who do not give them those who do not give those who do not give them those who do not give them those who do not give them a system account. figures or figures and you must be careful with the figures the fact that 1/3 there is a turnover of 1/3 does not mean that there is no half war in all the time that people go out to leave.

A lot of time for a mother and children have to depend if there is no other source of income, we have a program in Pennsylvania for essentially for all those who are not attended by the AFDC program, it is called a general assistance program and there are less than 15% in more than 18 months, so we have a great participation, we have a lot of young men who move in the well -being system after compensation for the lack of employment and then the opportunity of work is moved work that is not a job opportunity either. Generations of people in well -being is a verysmall throughout the system that does not mean that the system is currently defined and as a set of programs that we have often gathered do not contradict each other and I am the first to agree with the DR ..

Friedman that some of the programs are contradictory, however, I think it is too wide to say that we make people people into helpless children. I do not remember talking with anyone who has been in well -being who did not believe that they were being treated as children while they were in which they did, since you should make a difference a distinction between the system to help people and people who were used in that system. We use poorly trained people who are not equipped to help people who say they are social workers, are not social workers. I do not have the skills of attitudes and some of them even concern, so I believe that one has to separate a conceptual framework from a system designed to help people and what this country and the community put in that system to separate those that separate the lots of reality that separate the skills that are available in the order to implement what the objectives are the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the objectives separating the lots of reality from reality.

The objectives are talking about how it works. It would be the first to say that it is a system that I administered if I had made the poorly prepared people do the work they established us and that I would not say that the system we establish concentrated me in the social welfare of the people who think that, in fact, the system was very little to think that it had made people of the people who are built with the construction of the skills. The system that we are stereotypes is a great paternalistic interference in the lives of individual families and, in fact, it is not this true Thompson, the number of cases is so high for an individual well -being worker that cannot do a lot of interference and individual family lives more in the last decade, there has been a real attempt to relieve this well -being in this well -being.

Facilitate the work of those who want to do it, so it is not such a hard image, since sometimes we understand that this omniscient well -being worker is there that is there in the living room with the family making all their decisions for them for them are never heard of a government program that was defective in which the people who did it did not say if we only had more money and what did not give us the money. One was that when you said talk about an unemployed man assuming that you were cruel and took away the well -being of this man, he would find a job and some in some salary that is always a job he can obtain, he may need a beneficial organization that enhances the private beneficial organization, but that he will get a job, I want them to react to those of those who return to Milton.

And that is where several of our young people will now obtain their work in those activities that are illegal and the only opportunity they have to obtain part of a livelihood. Program, but what has to complement that it is normally the provision of some kind of nursery agreement, whether the individual woman has to earn enough money to be able to pay privately for her nursery or, in fact, she is cited subsidized through this set of insidious corruption programs of the programs administered by the federal government, which in fact makes our job which makes it a form of employment in which it is a way of making a kind of history.

The environment as if there were a predestined amount of poverty a predestined amount of unemployment and that the well -being system is not in any way 20% of the lower population of the population that I have never always been true that it is also true that 20% of the lower population must be living in the government and governed by the Government Commission, for example, of female households. Amount of teenage pregnancy I grew in an era of when people and particularly blacks were much poorer than today faced much more discrimination in today and in which the teenage pregnancy rate was much lower than today, I do not think there is a predestined amount of teenage pregnancy, a predestined amount of deserting of other husbands has done a study of the black family that shows that this complete notion is that this is the black family that is the black family that is the black family that has always been the black family.

That it has always been the black family that has always been the family, but that has always been the family, but it has always been the family, but it has always been the family. It rises in 1925, the great bulk of black families was intact of two parents until 1925 and returning through the slavery of hoop, so now it is only in our own time that we suddenly see that this inevitable tragedy that the well -being system says that it will rush to a sound in which it is a point for a very small group that we are talking about 12% of families are not intact that are not intact that are not intact that are not intact that are not intact that are not intact that is not intact that is not intact that is not intact that is not intact that is not intact that is not intact that is not intact that is not intact. in which you do not know in itself the one who does not know that it is not a group other than a group.

In general, we are talking about 12 percent of the families 12 percent, it is correct, it is a small number of well -being, we are still talking about a significant component of the lower 20 percent that is 20 percent lower, whether they are above the poverty line or below the poverty line, they are still 20 percent lower and the problem is the responsibility of the other 80 percent, if any, its program plan is to eliminate the lower 20 percent, but it is 20% lower, but it is 20% lower, but it is 20% lower, but it is 20% lower, but it is 20 percent, but you lower level below 20 percent, 20 percent of the lower one is at 20 percent that has 20 percent more, since it has 20 percent more.

Legitimacy plus unemployment I am not making meat illegitimate children who do not have to be subsidies. As human beings do not have a responsibility, but I hope we have a compassion and interest in the lower 20% and I just want to tell him, but the capitalist system the private system of the company in the nineteenth century in the nineteenth century. Capitalism had been a period of the greatest effusion of the activity of Elemosylary and charitable that the world has known and one of the things I have against the low welfare system is that it has destroyed the private charitable arrangements that are much more effective much more compassionate much more compassionate, much more than the person and helps people who are not guilty for their own situation.

The segments of society were excluded from the notion of private property in the nineteenth century, namely idiots and imbéciles, so I do not return to the nineteenth century and I maintain it like any Paragic that we would like to replicate today that Milton now be that now it is the people of the prescription. But, in the first place, I would like to obtain a reaction around the panel, it is a viable approach to the durable problems of the negative poverty income tax, I think it is a viable approach to some part of the poverty problems, it first implies the cash payments instead of the payments in the type, since I understand that the payments do not have categories, but that it is known that it is known.

The income falls below a certain level, can have some level of income guaranteed for people depending on the size of the family and then has a recovery rate that is modest, I suppose that, by definition transition between where we are now and where we would like to go because, although I agree with you, since we have corrupted people in the well -being and that they have reached them there, we have the obligation to not throw them into the street and put them in the We have been fine, but I would like to replace all the reactions so that this is going well.

The poverty family, a $ 32,000 figure per family cannot be found, now the average poverty family is not obtaining the $ 32,000 and, therefore, clearly someone between the treasure and those families are obtaining a lot of a lot of that money and I believe that if they simply eliminate the concepts of income from income and that are the objectives and that they are the objectives of the objectives of the bad. However, I like to point out that the administrative configuration that we have another bureaucracy that someone has to take into account the profits that someone has to decide when to pay what is entitled, there is a time delay between the payment of their profits and the payment that we must pay those that the children are in which it is a negative tax.

Building in a negative income tax, in fact, subsidizing the illegitimate, to see that Tom Soul is so concerned about the main reason why it is not feasible today to have a negative income tax is because the bureaucracy of current well -being would be without work, they are the main objectors such as Senator Patton now that he is now a senator Pat Moyni That there is a cactitude of a cact that occurred to the heiress that it was an heiress, it was an heiress that was a question. I do not believe that these administrative problems if they have promulgated it would be at all serious, I think that the other assumption under the negative income tax and is one that I am not sure to be able to buy is that everyone has a minimum level of understanding on how to spend money in other words how to use the market to satisfy desires and and I, as an economist, could say yes.

Who will not be able to do it, but that is a minority problem that is a problem for private activity in private charity, one thing is sure they are spending, they would be spending their own money and that you are knowledgeable that you are with my money, but it would be a less bad stage at this time, the well -being worker is spending MR. A money to help Mr. City and there is a great take -off in the middle, since Tom Sowell said the question is not whether people are richer in low income can spend their money effectively, the question is what the basement does so effectively compared to the effectiveness of the effectiveness of the effective Standard that indicate that the same is true in the area of ​​education that are saying that families would be selected with the schools selected with the Select Select Caped Select, with their issues of votes.

Could they make much worse than the corrupt bureaucrats are doing and, nevertheless, in the public school system, we are in education in another program that I have had equivalent? You said that half of the money does not go to the poor or something that should not lead the viewer to think that everything that money goes to the administrators of the programs, many of whom talk about those who are not poor understanders, for example, social security, since the show, thinks that everything that money goes to the administrators of what is talking about do not like those who do not like the benefits of social security.

Pay about two thirds of its benefits more or less to non -poor people and those are in some welfare definitions or programs against poverty and this is how statistics present this horrendous discrepancy that sounds like the total amount of money spent and the total benefits in cash that go to the poor, I think it is a perfectly valid point, because we were supposedly Think that this is a great point of view. tortuous that we are to people who now have the expectations that the expectations of going to those who give those who grant them no, do not have the way they have no problem having problems so that they do not have the way they do not like.

Surely as we use when an almond could be made for us, not the disappointing expectations on which people have built their lives during a generation, but do not continue for eternity to avoid a generational transition, what are the other obstacles for them to start now? It is that there is no way to build a sensitive negative income tax system that does not harm some people, there will be some people who will get less money than are now low, particularly those in higher income groups, particularly the tributary that is now being subsidized by the rich and that they will politically difficult for people manage money that is not easier toManage the one that is not easier to manage the one that is not easier.

Now, there is no way that I can build such a program, but although it is not politically feasible, now the strength of the story is on its side, it will become political foods, let's say they do not give the impression that well -being administrators were against the negative income tax, for example, Moynihan says they would lose their jobs, for example, many of us opposed the characteristics in certain characteristics in that program of $ 24 $ 24 2,2,2,2 years. And if one falls into the Congress Registry, it will be demonstrated that those who will testify are saying that we are four conceptually, but we are against this piece and this piece if it changes that it has our support, it was in the same position, I have first proposed the negative tax of the rent twenty -five years, but I testified against the final version of the Nixon plan for which, why due to the oses of Welfare, which had taken them to introduce them to the that had become a decent day negatively.

The bad as what you have now would have been added in addition to everything else that is its political reality that has changes in political reality and that is the important thing that I want to say one more thing about this problem of this problem of everyone we have been talking about and that is returning to Bob Lemons. The income classes that those who pay taxes, all other well -being programs not only go a lot of money for the people who are accommodated, but on average the poor are taxed and those accommodated are subsidized in the higher income classes, we have been very intelligent when connecting the poor offspring in the lower part to pay us well, such as wages, such as wages of the Buephics and that provide us with a good benefit and at least what they do not He goes to things and at least what he says does not.

The negative income tax even though it recognizes obstacles, why is it so sure that it will come because the current system has within it the seeds of its own destruction, there is no way that a system built as the prison in my opinion can avoid creating more and more social problems and something that no one will have to be done has been the alternative, but finally it is not an effective alternative to the negative income, and therefore the negative tax occurs and the negative tax occurs The negative tax and the beginning occurs and what is due to the reduction of shit?

Whether in any modern industrial democracy, this conceivable system will be executed without a fairly elaborate well -being basis of some kind, but feel that I do not think it can be because I believe that essentially the asset of well -being of the well -being programs reflect the values ​​of this society that if it were not what would have been revolted before yes, yes, there are rumors about its cost and I think that is primary a function of the rapid rates of the rates of the rates of the rates rapid of the influence rates of influence. Taxpayer, but I believe that at a level we wanted to give up the responsibility of taking care of real day -to -day care and, in a modern technical industrial society, as if we have the tax system and the government system, it is probably not a viable viable alternative, I do not think we are going to get out of it, I do not think they will not see my private money that can make it

free

or not to give and essentially make a difference in the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people of the people.

To any of the levels that I do not have to make it take into account the laws of the persons of the persons of the persons who do not have to make it take into account the laws of the persons of the people of the people who do not have to do. Massiah T, being modern technology or industrial technology that have to do with an ideology and particularly an ideology that is very strong among academic intellectuals and in the media and I think that as time passes and more and more intelligent ideas they replace the type of vague divisions that will dominate today that the political climate changes and that is the only thing that is the only thing that is interested in the form of reform at this time. about accommodations and and theorists and so forth we forget that we're talking about People and we may sit in the Ivory Tower and Talk About Whether This System Will Work and Eithher Logically or Ideologically Why It Won't Work at The Same Time There Are Máse Masses of People of People outside or locked out of the system that you and i are part of and submohow we've drop to make souto thoss people are taken care of and the short of not doing it of cours New York City asked me when we had a strike, what would I do if I couldn't check people when our workers were on strike and I told him after the first month that chaos needs what he means that I did not say that any man or woman in the street of New York City includes a MR?

Mayor will be sure if we cannot take care of people or leave this discussion and hope that they join us for the next episode of Free to

choose

next week is equality that the birth right of Americans is healthy for a nation when the government tries to impose equality on all its citizens.