CRUZ AZUL vs AMÉRICA. LUIS MALAGÓN debió ser EXPULSADO por falta sobre URIEL ANTUNA | Futbol Picante

Yes yes yes Well Fernando Hernández was the referee, the appointment was surprising to me because I think Guerrero César did a much better job than him and the two best referees in the country were thrown out But well, let's see some actions in my opinion I think that Malagón's one falls very short if it's a penalty it's a very clear penalty a late play that it arrives it's late If the ball goes out I say I think there was no need for the foul but let's see This yes Malagón arrives super late with a stomp on the tendon just see here how it comes from behind yes In my opinion this this play at the wrong time that is not going in search of the ball would have to be judged with a red card Yes for

malag

ón and then they come some plays where no no he doesn't want to point out I say Here he lets it run I don't know why Because no one from Ame

rica

receives it either and there is a very clear foul and here there is a situation that I want to comment on by eliminating the intentionality Yes the referee He has to qualify the fact.

Rotondi sees Henry Martin. He sees it. There is a foul below and then a push comes. Another foul comes, it's a push from Quiñones, I say if you're going to give an advantage, take advantage of whoever it is committed to. This one was committed, but if you have six or seven opponents in front of you, it's difficult for you to take advantage of it for an advance. Promising the classification of fouls In some moments it drops at times the game allowed him to let it flow but I think that the two important plays failed now I heard Pietra comment on the triple penalty this play does not fall within the parameters of an obvious scoring opportunity due to the position the position of the ball the ball is already going out if it does not fall within the parameters so the referee in this action must judge the seriousness of the foul No the obvious opportunity does not fall within these parameters this foot then red Yes of course it is a red card That's why I was commenting from the beginning and when I was seeing him as a bad guy, not Felipe as Marill.

Let's see about Martín. What I was asking him about was an area that can be considered a triple punishment that sets the rule but Roton runs over. Hey, they say no. swearing that name of God in vain, not because it makes him angry for God, it makes the referee, for God, he won't be able to cure whatever it is but but it's a foul and it's a stomp on the Achilles tendon from behind or let's go here obviously they say that If football is not perfect, why should refereeing be perfect? ​​I, you are the authority on this.

I think a yellow card for Malagón is good and I think that Rotondi accidentally steps on it. all that But Felipe the referee is always a true driver And on top of the strictly applied regulations there is a driving issue and I believe that common sense will always be above common sense cannot be above the rules of the game but they are opinions I don't know what my teammates from laslas ju think, I see yellow in the case of

malag

ón and I don't see a penalty, for me it is the best arbitration of this referee Fernando Hernández I think the thing about malagón is good I think it is very good no sanction Henry's but why not sanction the deen mentioned well I want to tell you that the rules have changed let me tell you why there is no longer intentionality I told you a little before the program there are two factors that are not in the regulations which are the intention and taking care of a show It seems to me that the referee does a good job.

It doesn't seem to me that those two factors do not exist in the regulations, but the referee, if you ask him, I asked Arturo on one occasion, the referee has a moral responsibility to take care of a show. It seems to me that the referee does a very good job, the match is taken care of based on the rules of the game, not on what if he doesn't want to or decides not to send off when that is not taking care of the show, the referee is not there for the referee, he takes care of the show by applying the rules. of the game correctly, even Henry is stopping Rotondi, he has his arm to stop them.

What Henry does next is complain about the stomp but he never complains. I respect his opinions, but I do want to make it clear that the situation has changed intentionally and that issue has changed. Not by removing the intention, then what the referee should sanction is the fact that he did, there is a push. Yes, there is a stomp, yes, whether it is intentional or not, that is no longer valid. But how is he going to send off the goalkeeper if the ball has already touched him? antú and goes outside for that reason it gets worse Because if the ball is not in dispute and Malagón arrives with his studs at the Achilles tendon it is fine not because it is a final the referee has to take care not to send off or No, I heard it from Arturo Briso at the time.

Well, you can listen to Pier Luigi. You can also listen to Pier Luigi, but the referee is taking care of the show based on the application of the rules of the game. Yes, I do believe that it goes beyond that. Taking care of the show above taking care of the show are the rules, you don't have to apply them but I also think that they have to be unobjectionable. I see Malagón's yellow and I don't see a penalty in the other one, that is, now if I saw a foul Clara, you say which show and which show is gone, but I don't see it, I don't see those elements as a pair.

Ah, the regulatory red is the one that is one of those that has to do with the referee's criteria, that's how I perceive them, but I also understand what Felipe says that there may be elements that roe controlling the ball because ROM was being discussed with Felipe. My dear Felipe, to explain this triple punishment because the triple punishment implies the foul, the penalty and the red card, not in an obvious opportunity. Goal in an obvious opportunity. of Goal Because if it were a clear goal opportunity then you get yellow at most so that it is a double punishment This is not a clear opportunity We agree The strange thing is that in this it is not a clear goal opportunity and the action that should qualify the The referee is the gravity with which Malagón goes about what I don't see is that gravity to get a red that's the only thing it's relative no but he doesn't need to break his leg for him to be expelled let's see Felipe and I what I would do is expel expel the defense that gave the bad pass back, one the second is what Jorge is saying that when the play goes outwards there is no longer an obvious opportunity to score a goal.

But there is a foul then the penalty is well marked but the yellow card should be given I don't know Why did he take it out or not? He says it's red. Felipe says it's red. I say it's red. If it's red, it would be because it's the last man. The last man. Because there aren't two, it's one. out Hugo well then it's not a red card no Felipe says it's red Because he sees it as aggression what happens is that I saw Thomas aggression I saw Thomas in which I even doubt that there was contact there are shots that say He touched him or he didn't touch him I think he did touch it that's why that's why the penalty the penalty or the play Roberto you told me it looks red on yours Felipe because you do wonders there with your little program but then you saw the other one that Herberto brought mri another shot but it's a different shot is a different shot where you can't see anything Yes but the shot we took here is visible Of course it's the stomp from behind well I say let's see I'm going to do it like the old masters please those who want me to ro But that's No man, that's not valid, man, neither are the rules Well, let's apply the AC rule, we're going to see by applause, the rule is the rule But there are plays of appreciation, you also perceive what is shown It's that it's a good thing to referee and and and and yet and the bar and the resources there are always conflicting points of view and corners to argue but but it was yellow Hey Felipe Felipe and there was not even a yellow card, right, they didn't warn him I have other information And that's it, that's the referee's mistake I think he should have given a warning At least wait, the tuca is waking up the tuca angry criminal against Martín no no Of course not the rotundi one the rot foreign one