17 most GARBAGE Tech Fails.

Welcome to the top 17 trashiest

tech

failures of all time. It's so bad that I don't want to just throw these products away. I want to incinerate them from my mind, starting with BMW, who in 2022 decided to bless us with the generous offer to pay $18 a month to heat our car seats, yes, the car seats you already paid for and already have everything you need to heat them. , and the additional fuel cost you will incur for that heating is also paid to the company. I was literally going to block the feature until they received their direct debit and it actually gets worse.

This is all part of the BMW extras, which include absolute gems like the iconic sports sounds, which are literally just engine sounds for the price of $120, the audacity to charge anyone. $120 to make your car sound like a car, so I give this a 2 out of 10 because it's

garbage

, it's not like the company suddenly went under because of this and now they just pulled the feature, although I don't. buy a BMW, especially after your SMY comment which is basically trying to tell the people who complained that they were wrong and just didn't understand, you know, but you know what's even worse than paying for a feature you should have had. paying free for a feature you were born with, enter Power Balance bracelets.

These loops here were advertised as being able to increase your athletic performance by resonating and responding to the body's natural energy field with hologram

tech

nology and they sold like hotcakes. becoming CNBC Sports' Product of the Year and even spawning copycat brands trying to copy their technology, unfortunately it was soon discovered that the only technology they really had was the technology that made those shiny stickers found attached to Microsoft CD cases. Windows, which led to the company receiving a massive $57 million lawsuit for false advertising and then proceeding to file for bankruptcy in 2010, coming full circle, so to speak, with a very respectable 3 out of 10, but you know which is even more rubbish than charging people for something they shouldn't be charging you for.

Charge people so you can charge them more. Enter Amazon's entire Dash product line. This company created an entire ecosystem of physical products whose sole purpose was to make it easier to order more products from Amazon, as if there were a dashboard wand that could scan barcodes and add those products. to your Amazon basket and then order them with a voice command, but I think the

most

fun is the Dash Button, individual $5 physical buttons to order specific Amazon products with a very literal single click; they light up green when pressed to confirm that your order has been placed or red if something went wrong now it's that cool in concept yes, it sure is nice that when you place your first order they refund the price of the button yes, sure too It's nonsense beyond belief, you better, I mean, to begin with, what do you do when the price of the product goes up?

Do you find out when it's already at your door or when your bank calls you to tell you that your account is empty? What happens when a child or guest walks in and simply presses the button? to see what happens or because they think it's a light switch. I mean, it's not like Amazon is sending you an undo button, but what really makes this seem like some kind of off-season April Falls joke is that on top of this whole Amazon thing. had already been running their Subscribe & Save subscriptions for home products for years, which completely eliminates the need for you to recognize that you're out of a product and then order more and actually saves you money too because you get a discount for subscribing and leaving these poor Dash.

Buttons are essentially an expensive way to pay more for products and get them later, so it's not surprising that the government decided to rule against them for violating consumer protection laws and that buttons have been quietly discontinued shortly after. after. I think we just clicked order accidentally, I hope. you like Head and Shoulders, but unfortunately for this upcoming company it's pretty difficult to quietly discontinue a product when that product also happens to be one of the

most

funded boosters of all time. This is the best coer I've ever managed to get and I'm not even kidding when I say this is one of the most impressive products I've tried all year.

Well, for starters, it comes with a BL blender, a blender that tells you exactly how much alcohol and ice to put in your drink and the cooler is what powers your blender. You place your blender inside and press this button. Nothing will happen if you don't put a blender in there which is such an important safety feature and this company has literally thought of everything because once your drink is blended you will even have a holder for your drink ready to serve. You can see there's a divider in the middle of the stove that's also a cutting board and it actually gets better because this thing has plates that come with it, they're spring-loaded. -loaded mechanism to store them and those plates work like frisbees sorry, the thing has magnets everywhere like there's a magnet in here to store your pocket knife.

There's a magnet inside here that's for storing your actual knife. There's even a bottle opener here. with magnets on the bottom so it can pick up your bottle caps it has an LED for when you get scared at night it has an extendable handle and wheels for transport and they even have a built in pulley system that allows you to stretch it over this Huge compartment here to tape down other heavy things you want to carry with the caller. This is incredible and over 62,000 backers agreed to give this company $13 million in funding. How do you go wrong from there?

Sponsors were supposed to receive their callers. February 2015. but instead they received a letter from the company's CEO telling them that he was postponing the launch to add some additional features. Turns out those extra features were that he was also listing the item on Amazon. There were 6,2000 people waiting for a product. He had already paid for it and yet this CEO decided to delay that shipment multiple times just to get more cash and after about a year of these delays things got complicated, angry backers started attacking CEO Ryan Greer, misleading him by sharing his personal data and even sending him death threats, forcing the entire operation to shut down and what could have one day been a billion dollar company and the vast majority of people who believed in the product couldn't even touch one, four out of 10 now, if anything.

It seems like every big tech company has tried to build a smart home speaker. Everyone wants a piece of that pipe. It's just that when it was Samsung's turn to do it in 2018, something went very wrong and they said it would be available at the end of the year powered by its own Bixby personal assistant that would be absolutely decked out with three speakers that would cover your high notes, three separate speakers that would cover its Motes and then a large subwoofer to drive the base, all topped off with a feature called sound steering that could figure out where you were in a room and direct the sound specifically toward you, improving your sound experience and minimizing distraction for others.

Well, that sounds great. Can I buy one? No buddy, sorry, is the currency very soon after the announcement, the red flags started to appear? the company kept assuring people it was coming, but while doing so it kept pushing the release date further and further back, and yes, the company physically showed the product at the CES tech show the following January, even though there was only one speaker in all of Samsung. stand and, interestingly enough, a Handler was present the entire time, who was the only person allowed to talk to the thing. It greatly concerned Samsung that they announced a public beta later that year in South Korea for a Galaxy Home Mini, so they hadn't even released the main Galaxy Home that they originally announced, but now they were releasing the mini that they hadn't announced just to people who signed up for a beta version and then the following year, still without announcing the product, the Galaxy Home Mini was given away for free. for Korean customers who pre-ordered the Galaxy s20 phone and that was the last we saw of it, with many of these things, the product was honestly great because apart from the expected features, it also had an infrared sensor that allowed you to control it or control other devices via infrared signals, like a TV remote, meaning that unlike many smart home speakers that are designed specifically to work with smart accessories, this one could interact with all of them, but actually They never launched it to buy it and then no time passed.

Fans kept asking which Samsung kept ignoring. I find it so funny that this is one of the biggest tech companies in the world and yet they keep acting like I swear I have a girlfriend, you just can't meet her, which Samsung should have done. they just came out and put a pin in it so people could stop expecting it, but instead, they've left fans sighing for over 5 years, which is at least a four, but you know what the next company will wish they had made. Nothing because that's much better than stealing someone else's product design and then getting caught.

Yes, I'm talking about Casei. For the most part, this company seems to have had a pretty clean track record. Their cases have always been expensive, yes, but premium because of. with mass customization, not to mention a company valuation of nearly $1 billion, and a sprawling set of brick-and-mortar experience stores, in theory, which should be a sign that you're doing original products right, all of that is went out the window when YouTuber Jerry manipulated everything. released a video showing how Casify's transparent looking skins were not designed by castify, but were in fact directly pulled from a collaboration between him and another company called dbrand, all the little easter eggs inside, jokes from both the YouTuber and from dbrand that wouldn't make sense. present in anyone else's product, everything was still in castified cases.

My favorite is 11111, which is the day dbrand started trading. Oh, and the dbrand logo. Oops, now Casi's designs were actually slightly different, but that makes it a lot worse because it becomes very clear that they not only copied it but they copied it and tried to change it to make it look like their own and then failed at that, but it What turns this from simple crap to pure

garbage

is that it's the same design but worse. Because Case Devies pulled the files from the dbrand website instead of the raw files that dbrand uses to print everything, the resolution is significantly lower and things aren't aligned the way originally intended.

I mean, this is already bad news, but it just stuck. falling, the company issued a statement stating that they are a bastion of originality which, interestingly, is not a suitable slogan to use when you have just been accused of your blatant lack of originality and then more parts were presented, but how do I fix it, a company focused on tech fixes that realized, hey, wait, a second case, the Defy X-ray case, that's our image case. Defy is being sued at least once, but maybe more, and either way, the reputational damage will be an even bigger hit than the millions they could have to pay. pay as we introduced the toy case before, but we won't do it now, so this will be easy 5 out of 10, okay, remember the squid game?

No, not this one, although to be fair, they're both pretty good at trying. To recreate its huge success, Netflix recently created its own version with real contestants just a year after Mr Beast already created a real contestants who appear to act like paid actors with almost anime-like exaggerated personalities that don't hold up. in real life, but that's another conversation now, obviously, with a real game show, no one is going to die if they fail a challenge, or it turns out that the filming conditions were so bad that the lawyers at Express, a law firm British personal injury lawyers, are representing two players who claimed to have suffered hypothermia and nerve damage while shooting the red light on green in cold conditions in the UK, apparently requiring them to remain motionless for long periods of time during the shooting in the cold is what caused the injuries, which is not just carelessness. by Netflix, but it also means that everything was very organized, since in the original show you would only have to stop for a few seconds, Max mostly, but to top it all off, while the squid game itself got an 8 out of 10 on IMDb. and one9.85% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, this masterpiece is a 4.8 and a 44 and is now also being investigated for its questionable ethics given that the original show was made to try to show the injustice of the whole thing, the inequality of how the rich would sit on top and pay to watch struggling people betray each other and go through incredible pain for their entertainment.

Isn't this recreation eerily close to proving its point, regardless of the trash version of something a YouTuber has already done better and before? out of 10 oh and uh, talking about things that have already been done better now that we are in the top 10, we cannot not talk about what has been described as the biggest failure in the history of the media, CNN and CNN, as the Most other cable television networks took notice. people canceled their subscriptions in favor of streaming and they rightly thought, yeah, we have to be there too, so they allocated a billion dollars to create this subscription service that they said was going to revolutionize news, which They promoted it in a way that made it seem. as exclusive 24/7 news content from all the highest profile presenters in their Arsenal, like CNN 2.0, the problem was that the end product was not some live shows, but nothing like that to the news that is already delivered free of charge by the normal channel.

CNN and it couldn't be anything more than that anyway due to contractual obligations CNN had with the cable TV providers and then as far as the rest of the content you would get, it seems like CNN completely misjudged. His audience had a cooking show, a book club show, there was even one about the challenges of being a parent, like who decided this. I think CNN massively. They overestimated how engaged the average person was with their hosts and how much they really cared about watching these characters on these shows, and at the same time they underestimated the impact of the Internet, how it has made people so accustomed to consuming news content in a way free that it became very clear, very quickly, that people who liked CNN as it was, wouldn't get any more of that by subscribing to CNN, plus it almost felt like they were following my only fan request, I guess the super fans of which there clearly were. not many or for a Savage take, as ramp Capital LLC says, imagine spending $300 million on a paid version of CNN when no one watches the free version because yes, if there is a silver lining to all of this it is the original budget of a thousand millions.

CNN only ended up spending 300 million because the service was shut down so quickly they didn't have time to burn the rest. CNN targeted 2.5 million subscribers in year 1 and only peaked at 150,000, making it one of the fastest in history. Services come and go and last only 32 days. I don't know whether to be impressed or dismayed that they managed to spend so much money in such a short time, but hey, I mean at least CNN has done some good things, it can't be the same. It can be said exactly about Ticket Master, people already thought Ticket Master was a rubbish website, they have a well established reputation of becoming the only place to buy tickets, marking up the prices of those tickets and simply making the whole process of Booking is unnecessarily stressful through their poor website as in March 2023 when they were selling tickets for The Cure their rates were no joke higher than the actual price of the tickets but this growing dissatisfaction with the service all came out ahead with Taylor Swift's ear tour, Ticket Master, like most companies that want to. make as much money as possible, but the way they do it is what sucks: it's a dynamic pricing system that constantly evaluates demand and whenever it feels people are willing to overpay, it makes them overpay. , and so in the case of Taylor Swift, whose concerts are going to have possibly the most rabid demand on the planet, this site absolutely ruined it, I mean the lines to start just to have the option to buy tickets, fans had to join to queues of over 40,000 people only for Ticket Master's highly unstable website to crash and send them back to the beginning again.

I remember reading a lady's story and this happened to her, no joke, 41 times while trying to get these tickets, but it gets worse because many fans discovered that they had once gone through hell to get them. the tickets finally in their basket and they were happily celebrating those tickets were taken away from them before they could pay them offered to other people for an even higher price these tickets kept going up in price until they found no joke $500 per person not including the ticket Master's additional fees and then when the lucky few who just mortgaged their houses to go see Taylor Swift managed to secure something, Ticket Master said, you know what customer experience wasn't bad enough?

I guess she had to do something else. In response to scalpers buying tickets from their listings and trying to sell them on eBay or StubHub for thousands instead of the already absurd hundreds, Ticket Master decided to make the UK tour a Booker main event, meaning the person who booked the ticket has to be at the venue to be able to enter, the only problem is that they make it clear on the website and that measure would also have the very unfortunate cost of the gifted tickets losing their value immediately after they have been purchased, so yes, Ticket Master was properly vetted. this year by the US Senate for overexerting their monopoly on the live music ticket industry, although I think major consequences should follow as well 5 out of 10, but if you subscribed to this channel then you will instantly be at 10 before we get to the top five, what I would call the catastrophic level of philage we have a couple of baffling ones that when you look at it just begs the question what were they thinking?

Microsoft Zoom, let me set the stage, it's late 2006, everyone is happily using their flip phones. You just introduced your grandpa to Nintendo Wii Sports and Apple's iPod has completely taken the MP3 player market by storm. Naturally, Microsoft wanted to be part of that party and the answer to trying to achieve it was the zoom 30, named after the number of gigabytes of storage it had. and not the number of people who bought one, although that wouldn't be far off now in terms of features, the zoom was basically a carbon copy of the iPod, it had one unique thing which is the ability to share songs you own. other Zoom users who were able to listen to them a couple of times, which could have been a great thing if Zoom had really taken off enough to become relevant, but it didn't have anything that could take it to that level, which confuses me.

The important thing about this product is that if they had released it in 2001, maybe 2002, it might well have captured some market share, but I'm talking about releasing a pirated version of one of the most influential multimedia devices of all time that didn't repairs none of the users. problems people had with that device 5 years after its release. I mean, the only appeal the zoon ended up having was literally just people who wanted a good MP3 player but didn't want Apple to make it, they got that market, but while Apple had over 70% of the MP3 streaming market , didn't even make it past four and then the real nail in the coffin came next year when Apple announced both the iPod touch and the iPhone, igniting the smartphone bug and practically killing it overnight. the desire for a standalone MP3 player, so zoon decided it was time to bury this mistake that, for a company as large as Microsoft, which has invested 289 million dollars in its development, is a huge failure of 6 out of 10 , maybe companies should avoid it altogether. four-letter words that start with zed because the next one is zoom, an even bigger failure.

Zoom was discovered in 2015 to be a "yeah, you're not dreaming" robotic pizza delivery company, and raised $500 million by promising to automate the entire pizza-making process with robots in At each stage, the robots assemble the pizzas. pizzas at company headquarters faster and more accurately than any human and then robots inside the trucks can cook the pizzas during delivery, starting at just the right time based on the customer's GPS location data. I mean, if this is what the robot uprising of the future looks like, where do I sign up? The problem, aside from the technical issues that hamper every part of the process, is that they forgot to take into account the roads the company was based on in San Francisco, and if you've seen San Francisco, you know those are not good roads for trying to cook pizza, which leads to many deliveries where the cheese that was supposed to go on top is used to decorate the floor of the van and the company's solution to this problem is hilarious.

Instead of cooking while driving, they resorted to parking in a central location and then using Runner cars to deliver pizzas from those trucks to other people's doors, so congratulations, you just invented a normal pizzeria, except it's a small vehicle metal that the company manufactured. a huge series of layoffs in 2020 that cut over 500 employees, including their entire robotics and food delivery truck business, so very soon they officially closed the pizza business and started selling sustainable food packaging for some reason . Zoom is a pretty catastrophic seven out. out of 10 fail in my books, made worse by a sarcastic leaked email from the CEO that blames the pandemic for most of the job cuts, but we all know it's because they tried to create a robotic pizza delivery company.

Have you ever accidentally shared the wrong thing on your screen? maybe you're playing fortnite on your other monitor on a work call, whatever it is, it can't be as bad as this Muhammad Mony Rosman in 2021, an employee at the automotive company valo left that job to go work for NVIDIA, graphics company, but it seems he took a couple of memories with him, allegedly downloaded without authorization the entire source code for Val's advanced driving and parking assistant and, while screen sharing on a Microsoft Teams call, accidentally minimized his PowerPoint presentation to reveal it, but do you want to know?

What is the worst part of this? Do you know who I was on a call with at the time, none other than his former employer, Valo, who Nvidia was collaborating with? If that's not poetry, then I don't know what is somehow. It gets even more complicated though German police raided the guy's home as part of a criminal investigation and discovered not only reams of valo documents on Muhammad's PC, but also printouts and even physical valo hardware nailed to his walls. The guy pleaded guilty and was forced to pay a $155,000 fine which, while in itself is silly compared to some of the other flops here, is a career-ruining move that has Valo also looking for hundreds. of millions in compensation from Nvidia for stolen trade secrets.

Now it's quite difficult to surpass something as a specialist. like that, but I think the online therapy platform could be a better help. The concept of the site is that many people increasingly need the help of a therapist for their mental health, but do not have access to one or need one too much. nervous about going out into the world looking for one, so better help makes therapy cheaper, more affordable and more accessible by doing it all online, promising safety and security to these vulnerable people, which is what makes This is the most difficult one so far.

This site is known for sponsoring. Countless YouTubers, podcasters and other influencers racking up the numbers, I mean, in 2022 alone, the site served 2.5 million customers and it looks like it's doing something great, so what's the big deal? Yes, see the FTC in an investigation, they found out that Betterhelp was selling the data. from these clients to companies like Facebook Snapchat and Pinterest so that those companies could advertise more directly to vulnerable people and obtain this data by repeatedly pressuring people who signed up for the service to answer this extremely personal intake questionnaire with questions like If you're experiencing overwhelming sadness, grief, or depression, and if you think they would be better off dead, imagine bringing vulnerable people like that to your site and providing them with statements like: Please be assured that any information provided in this questionnaire will stand private between you and your counselor, asking questions like that and then selling that information so Facebook can try to advertise some antidepressants, it really makes me a little sick 7 out of 10 and yes, besides affecting subscribers, better help also had to pay 7.8millions in customer refunds because of this anyway, go on, you know the Marvel Cinematic Universe or the MCU well, well this universe has faced one of the most unfathomably rapid declines in history, it may not be clear if you look at the surface level like just taking averages Marvel is still the highest grossing film franchise in the world, but that's not the whole story from 2008 to 2019.

Marvel managed to do something amazing: they created a very literal web of 22 full-length movies , almost all individually strong and completely interconnected, building slowly. towards the final climax which was the end of the Avengers and that peak was such a high peak that it's the last movie that I can remember where people were really fighting to get movie tickets and the crowd reactions when there was a twist in the plot, those felt like the moments where Live and the numbers match that feeling, with Endgame still to this day being the second highest grossing movie ever released, but as soon as that chapter was closed was when it started to go wrong like Marvel with the next chapter they tried to make. too much, I guess they thought well if 22 movies can result in a climax like that and make so much money, what about 22 movies plus 12 TV shows running at the same time?

They started producing so much content that no one physically had. time or money to keep up as it basically required a monthly subscription to Disney plus and then perhaps to try and push more people to subscribe the company also started increasing the importance of all this secondary content within the universe to the point. where, if you don't watch the latest Marvel TV show now, you'll often not only miss a single fun reference in the next Marvel movie, but you'll actually approach that movie with a significantly worse understanding of it. characters that someone who has put their career on pause to keep up with everything and combine that with the massive superhero fatigue that even a lot of core fans feel like people are starting to skip things and as soon as you start skipping some of them, it becomes much easier to just skip it all skip is actually a very appropriate word given the state of this room right now and these aren't just my personal feelings Bob Iger CEO of Disney has publicly blamed Disney plus for recent poor film performances from Marvel.

The production dilutes the audience's focus and attention, and while it's not like Marvel or Disney would be canceled or fined for anything, it's hard to underestimate the sheer level of monetary loss they're seeing right now, like Antman and WASP Quantum Mania , that thing only generated profits. $470 million at the box office, it needed 600 just to break even, so the company is already a long way from the billion to 3 billion per movie that the last-gen Avengers movies were grossing and could very well continue. lowering that trend unless the company realizes it. This is an eight but now we're in the top three, the trash at the bottom of your trash bag, starting with IRL, a social app founded in 2016 that focuses on groups and events designed for people to meet in real life. with the aim of creating something more authentic and organic. communities and this raised $200 million skyrocketing to an EV valuation of 1.2 billion.

We're creating Facebook groups and events for the generation that doesn't use Facebook IRL. CEO Abraham Shafi told The Verge that it turns out that there is no other product really focused on this space for the Next Generation is great and almost in 2022 people started to suspect this guy. Abraham Shaffi claimed that there were 20 million monthly active users on this app and they use it as a way to make people feel, well, everyone's in on this. app maybe you should use it too except you really shot yourself in the foot as this sparked an internal board investigation that found 95% of the app's users were Bots, the app is literally called IRL and its users don't exist in real life and just to put that in perspective, Elon Musk's main argument when he tried to take out a Twitter buyer was that 20% of Twitter was bodies, obviously, as soon as something like that goes public. , the app had no choice but to just close it well, have you heard about the metaverse in October 2021 Mark Zuckerberg completely changed the name of Facebook, the company, not the app, to meta because he made a massive bet not only on the future of technology but in the entire world, popularizing the term metaverse to describe this. future vr/world he predicted we would live in and would also greatly increase the company's spending on it.

I clearly remember the moment the announcement occurred as easily one of the strangest sci-fi things to ever happen in the tech industry. It's like we're suddenly told that the future starts today, but in a really creepy way, whether you like it or not, and this is all failing due to a combination of bad timing and bad execution, either of which alone is enough. to take down a company, but together, that's going to cost a lot of money to fix in terms of time, I mean, no one saw it coming, that's part of the problem, it's a sign that we weren't ready, I mean, if you really want to create something drastic.

For a social change like this, the way to do it is not to simply drop it into the laps of unsuspecting civilians, but to slowly and surely build a pipeline of products with useful immersive capabilities so that people don't just see it as a new was that it starts tomorrow, but it naturally heads into it and then in terms of execution, the meta's own virtual world platform, Horizon worlds, is just horrible, it literally feels like something out of a weird horror movie, everything is empty, dead, boring and ugly, like okay, it's one. There's something to tell people about the future, fill it in, man, but it's a very different thing when you tell them that and then show them that it looks like this, look at this, wow, that's pretty cool.

They talked a lot about how it will revolutionize the metaverse. work, but I have yet to see a single useful work product that people are actually taking seriously and the mere fact that when researching this one of Google's most recommended searches was legs says everything you need to know about how it is has felt the actual interaction of the metaverse now regardless. of whether the metaverse will ever recover in the future, if we just look at its current state, it is bad and getting worse only in the first 9 months of 2023, the reality labs division of the meta has recorded a loss of what you might want . to cover their R for this 11.5 billion, which means they could be on the verge of breaking their previous record loss of 13.7 billion in 2022 and it's all happening at the same time as major staff cuts, which doesn't It is exactly a sign that it is suddenly about to change. in the corner, especially after having almost $50 billion total deep in this Venture metaverse, yes, 50 billion, it really feels like Zuckerberg is taking stacks of cash in his hands and pointing lasers at the nearest trash can you can find.

How can I give this? anything less than a nine and more worrying, what's worse than this? I'll tell you what Twitter or save the platform. Elon correctly pointed out that Twitter's business model wasn't the best and that they needed to find a way to make more money, but the steps he took to get there were felt. For starters, as a massive overcorrection, it forced users to pay if they wanted to be verified or even keep their existing verification devices, which really changes the meaning from a way of discerning public figures to a contest of how big is your wallet.

He increased the ads. to 100, now you'll see them on the sides, you'll see them as you scroll, you'll see them in the responses, all while he laid off about 80% of the company's workforce to cut costs and then started making his points of personal views on the platform Elon really liked the idea of ​​free speech, which in theory seems like a good idea, but what it means in practice on Twitter is simply reducing the level of moderation, which is probably less of a choice and more a consequence of firing everyone and the way it has been done, I don't see how it helps anyone, you just need to scroll through your home feed now to see explicit images of serious incidents occurring and even deaths, not to mention that the Elon himself has been accused of anti-Semitism. which, when something like that happens to the figurehead in charge of making decisions for the entire company, that's going to start to gain trust, so at the same time that the Company is trying to increase the number of ads, the advertisers basically just One reverses them. upon leaving, it wasn't helped by Elon not so politely telling them to leave, which combined with traffic across the platform dropping 14% after just one year of Musk, not to mention the dissatisfaction of many people who still use it .

All this has caused a great drop in the value of the company. Official reports have confirmed that Twitter is worth at most less than half of the $44 billion it was bought for, but according to journalists who unraveled the true meaning of one of its tweets, the real value may be as low as only four which is just embarrassing considering the short period of time in which all this damage was done and I think it's worthy of a 10 now the only one oh my god I have to be brave here now the only other 10 What I want to give the opposite reason is to the Opera browser.

Here's why every time I use the Opera browser it makes me feel like I have a co-pilot working with me in a metaphorical sense that he has the tools to allow it to function. around my needs like Lucid mode which basically means no more blurry videos, just hover over any video whether old or new and with one click it will be sharper, it will be clearer and it will have less visible ghosting and now you can also choose the level of video enhancement you want, but also the co-pilot exists in a very literal sense with Opera's own AI built into Ara.

You want a summary of the web page you're on, which is like two clicks away. You want a quick summary of the web page you're on. Answer a question without having to Google and then review articles, it's right there and I know it seems like a big task to set up a new browser, but this can literally import your old browser settings in a minute. Link in description to download. Trade now