Is This the Best AIC Video Ever Made? Mr Salles

Hello and welcome to another

video

that will give you the

best

marks. If you're aiming for grades 5 and 6, I'll show you what it looks like and then take the same points as us. look at grades 5 and 6 and I'll show you how to convert that to grades 7 to 9 and it will look like

this

: You'll get a quote for each character and each theme and I'll explain to you how that will give you a grades 5 and 6 and then I'll show you how interpret that in a different way with another quote that you can link to to get grades 7, 8 and 9, then I will reveal the text below so you can take notes if you want and fully understand how to get those high grades and the

best

of studying literature is that getting these qualifications is really just knowing things and you will know the right things after

this

video

.

I will also check it with you so that you understand exactly what grade 6 skills look like, how to put them together in an essay and then I will teach you what you need to do to get all AOS to jump to grade 7, 8 and 9 and you will discover the mystery of why something It's yellow and some things are green and I'm finally going to run out of money. I'm really upset about this, but exams are closed and here we go, I'll show you how to read all my guides. and in fact, all the other guides that are on Amazon for all your topics for free for 0 dollars and 0 pounds for totally free will be at the end of the video, skip to the end if you want to find out or wait like a magnificent cliffhanger, what?

OK? Let's start directly with Burling, since you know he represents capitalism. Priestley is trying to explore what's wrong with capitalism by exploring what's wrong with Burling and you've probably used this word that he uses in almost all of my videos. Burling is therefore a construction and that means the author Priestley constructs it to present this point of view now once you have spoken in those terms you will automatically be in grades 5 and 6 our quote that a man has than to mind his own business and take care of himself and his own, then this is the opinion that Priest writes the work to discredit, he wants to prove that Burling is wrong, another point of grade 5 and 6 is that the inspector appears immediately after Burling has said that, as if Burling's words have summoned him with some kind of supernatural power, it's like an incantation, okay, cool, give me cool, seven, eight, nine, well, the next quote to which I want to take you is one that perhaps you have not studied.

I'm talking. I should change that drinking. I am speaking as a practical and stubborn man. Now we can show that this shows that Burling is callous, so he is stubborn and that suggests that capitalism is callous and selfish, which we got from this quote, that's how we linked the two quotes, but there is a lot more going on. Priestley is deliberately using language from the Labor Party manifesto, so you probably know that there was an election in 1945, the same year this play was performed, and this phrase, headstrong businessman, is actually in the Party manifesto Labor and it's something that the manifesto complains about, so it's a direct link to why Priestley created Burling and gave him those words: it's a call to people during this 1945 election period to vote for the Labor Party and it does so by turning this campaign speech into a drama that its audience can identify with. and we relate to it through our emotions and are therefore more likely to be convinced, but delve even deeper.

This is an allusion to the language of Sistani Baldwin. Now Stanley Baldwin was Prime Minister three times between 1912 and 1939, the same period in which the play took place. The covers remind us that it is set in 1912 and ends at the end of World War II, when it was produced so that

ever

y literate person in the country would know Sistani Baldwin's words about stubborn businessmen and accused them of profiteering. of the war, so now we have a much deeper attack on capitalism and the other way we can really attack the idea of ​​capitalism is how Burlington finds business, so you probably remember that he wants Sheila to marry Gerald even after Gerald has confessed. to an affair and calls marriage a business opportunity, he talks about how the Crofts and the Burlings are getting together now, this is hypocritical because in this quote he talks about taking care of himself and his people and we think of his people as his family, but Sheila is not just his family, she is his property and he ties her directly to business in this patriarchal view of society, so I hope you understood that and if you understood it, I guarantee that now you can get score 7 8 9 if the question is about Burling or capitalism.

Now let's take a look at point number 10 in grade 6, so to get grade 6 you need to link

ever

ything you have written with the ideas and perspectives of the writers now, if we just take a brief look at The cream marks of the grades 5 and 6 exist on this boundary between the 15 and 16 mark, so in grade 6 you have to write about ideas and perspectives, but in grade 5 in green here you don't need many ideas and perspectives, you just need some relevant context still , so the relevant context was that he represents capitalism, but if you've understood any of what I put there, it's grade 6 right away and then up, so I hope you can see how this video will work to give you the grades are fine , Gerald here comes the conventional view of grades five and six Sheila says of him you were the wonderful fairy prince, you must have adored him Gerald, this of course is when he has his affair with Eva, although he knew her as Daisy and he also says that She had been happier than ever before.

Now, when the inspector leaves, he does not accuse Gerald of being especially sinful and evil. Instead, Gerald is presented as kind even though he is deceitful. He treats Eva and Daisy apparently quite well on the surface. he is not as cruel as the other characters according to the inspector and Priestley does this, he creates it as a construct to show that even good men like Gerald are still cruel if they are capitalists, so being a capitalist forces them to exploit other people, just as Gerald agrees. that Burling was right to fire Eva, so he treats Eva like a commodity a little bit, you know she's in love with him, he met her, she's very happy for his attention, actually, she's a little in love with him, but still he ends the adventure and so this.

It's an element of cruelty, but maybe we can forgive it, so that's the conventional view, but let's get into those key ideas that take us to a higher level. Gerald says that Daisy knew this was coming to an end now, this is really interesting because although he claims that the end was due to him needing to be away on business for a few weeks, that's what Aunt Sheila, we know, the real The reason is that his friend was coming back from Canada, so I don't know if you remember this: his friend gave him the keys. to her apartment and she basically told Gerald to use it any way he wanted, which was the code for the mistress and as soon as she gets the key, what does she do?

He goes to the palace bar to look for a lover, who finds Eva? Daisy, he takes her to see honey, but he doesn't feed her first, she gets drunk, first he gets her a drink and then once she gets drunk, he sets her up in this apartment. Now I hope this search proves that it was all part of his plan. Far from being a wonderful fairy prince, he is actually exploiting her. Let's see how he exploits her. This would mean that Gerald would have to pay for a flat to house her if he were to use her own money, but he doesn't. she has the apartment for free, this would cost her a lot more than the little they pay her, that's how he described it, she had lived very economically with what he had allowed her outwardly and how that shows how superior she feels, so it's Al giving him a very small amount of money, I would like to argue that that is less money over time than he would have had to give her if he were paying her as a prostitute in the palace bar, so apparently he is treating her in a much better way. like a fairy prince, but in reality he is paying or less and as soon as he thinks that all my friends returning from Canada would have to pay for an apartment, he gets rid of her, she is not even worth the rent of an apartment for him and you.

I know this wouldn't be a lot of money for a man like Gerald, who runs his father's business, so what we see is total sexual exploitation. It is the patriarchal society at work where men use women for their own benefit and use their own power to control them. and they control them so successfully that they are able to tell themselves that they have done well, so he says that Daisy had been happier than ever before, even though in this relationship, in the power relationship, he abused them. completely of her and indeed she had it. her for a very cheap amount of money, so as you may have already deduced, I feel that Gerald is actually a despicable human being, not only because of what he has done, but because he then deceives himself by presenting himself as a good and kind person. , the complete opposite of what it is. actually it is now let's consider the lady.

Birling, the key quote is where he talks about Eva as girls of that class, so he is very dismissive of anyone who is socially inferior, especially from the working classes, so Eva is actually a woman at this stage, but she looks diminished by being called a girl and a priest. she has built the lady. Birling in this way attacks the idea of ​​social hierarchy to attack the idea of ​​class. You will remember that the inspector keeps saying that we are all one body and that he wants us all to be treated equally and he attacks the lady.

It's not so much that Birling is a capitalist but that her capitalism leads her to support this idea of ​​a social hierarchy that allows one group to feel superior to another and therefore is justified in thinking worse of another group. This is relevant in 1945 because Priest wants to create a welfare state, he wants a National Health Service, he wants adequate money available for people who were out of work and this is represented by the lady. Burling's charity and his decision not to give money to girls in that class are people who need it, so it's a cruel irony that the people who need money the most go to higher-ranking people for it. social hierarchy that considers them inferior to themselves, okay, those were two interpretations, so in the sixth grade right now the examiner can't help but give me less than a sixth if I fully explain those views, hopefully, Now that We are ready for 7th grade and above our date, the girl had started by telling us a bunch of lies so that we can easily link these two.

There is that diminishing description of IVA as a girl again, but it is also a logical doubt that she gave the lies that have preceded it so the interesting thing here is that Ms. Birling is not wrong. IVA told her a lot of lies and she said her name was madam. Birling said she was married, you know none of this was true so we can understand why mrs. Birling thinks she's a liar because she is, but this is the key that Mrs. Birling fails and most of the people missing IVA would rather commit suicide than take the stolen money or marry Eric, so this is a big clue from Priestley that something much deeper is going on.

Priestley seems to be suggesting that Eric has had a much larger effect on our engagement. suicide so we have a point of structure here that's why priestley gets mrs. Birling must confess first so that when we meet Eric we realize that his crime is much worse. So if you're asked who is the biggest culprit for the death of IVA, I'm going to argue that Eric is the biggest culprit. and this will be part of your proof that she would rather commit suicide and take her money or marry him and he offers to marry her. I'm not going to prove that here is in my other videos my entire review guide, so it's not like that. much that mrs.

Birling and her charity denied her VAT help because they forced her to return to Eric, so she comes and says that if the girl's death is due to someone then it is due to him, of course, there is a huge irony that she doesn't know him. in question is Eric, but this is Priestley's device to show the audience that Eric is actually the most responsible one. Now Eric, of course, will also represent his own class. Burling and therefore represents the social hierarchy for which Priestley is gay to argue that Eric is also responsible because he is a member of the upper classes and as we will see in a minute he has exploited Eva as a girl of that class in a much worse way . way that mrs.

Birling now consider Eric, then the most important quote from her is probably this: I think it's a shame that we try to get the biggest profits, why shouldn't they try to get the highest salaries? So this is an attack on capitalism, so, as a construction, it is anti-capitalist. She also represents the younger generation along with his sister Sheila and also represents the voice of hope for change if the youth believe this and there is an opportunity for them to not act like their parents and not actlike Gerald, so they see him as a voice. of hope is the conventional view of fifth and sixth grades having more than one view takes you to sixth grade, you could even tie it in with the inspector's message we are all one body by showing how he builds this idea around equality, they deserve high salaries like We deserve high profits, there is balance and equality with this highest word and that level of language analysis takes you right to seventh grade, by the way, okay, our date from grades seven to nine, she told me no wanted him to come in, so This is his first meeting with E and Eva and this shows us that he forces his way into her room, she has tried to reject him, so instead of treating her as an equal like he implied here, In fact, her behavior is the same as her mother's.

He treats her as an inferior who has to do what he wants, then explains that he was in that state where a guy becomes unpleasant easily, so an analysis of the language here will take us directly to the higher grades first, he doesn't call it state . Instead I was in ace, he calls it verse state, now I regret that state, I was in that state, in other words he expects everyone to know what state a man is in, so here is a massive attack on society patriarchal. It's about men exploiting. the he power of him and Eric says but we all know that state, in other words, he is normalizing it, he is saying that this is how men behave.

I am no different from other men. That's a terrible self-justification for what he's done, that he's working his way up and then. forcing himself to get closer to her so this suggests that unpleasant, the description of the state has something common to all men, not just Eric, okay, but the word unpleasant again suggests what happened there if I tell you what that is, YouTube won't allow it. I put ads in the video so you'll have to use your imagination about what he's done, then he distances himself from this evil by referring to Sue not as an AI but as a charlatan and a guy which makes him sound less cruel.

Less violent, less cruel than if he had called himself a man, even a boy, it is a way of distancing oneself from his responsibilities. Now this is important because at the end of the play you will wonder if Eric has really learned the inspector's lesson and I am going to argue from this that Eric is deceiving himself throughout the play, so here he is trying to explain what has done, but he deceives himself about the seriousness of the incident and our proof that it was so serious, remember is that Eva would have preferred to commit suicide rather than return to him, that is a big clue as to what happened when events unfolded. they got ugly.

Now another way he always has responsibilities is when his father accuses him of stealing the fifty pounds and his answer is not me. He intended to return it now, that's a tremendous abdication of his own responsibility, isn't there? He's saying I didn't really steal it right, of course he did, and there's another level of sophistication here that Priestley's audience would have understood and we wouldn't. It's not because we've forgotten that there are 20 shillings in a pound, but when you remember that there are 20 shillings in a pound, as everyone would have done at the time, 50 pounds is there for more than 40 weeks of the wages any of they would have won.

In Burling's Well there is no way that Eva would suddenly go to Mrs. Burling's Charity to ask for more money if Eric had really been giving her all this money, so there is the other level of self-deception. He's obviously spending a lot of this on his own drinking, so he stole this money but didn't even give her all of it. For Eva, now this will help us go back to the idea of ​​​​the younger generation and argue that in fact Eric will not really change, yes, he will learn the inspector's lesson, but he will not act on it because it is against his nature.

It is his nature to deceive. himself and deceive others now let's consider that other member of the younger generations Sheela his most important quote is probably this one at the end of the play not because I remember what he said, what he looked like and what

made

me feel fire and blood and anguish, so let's make it clear that she learns her lesson from the inspectors, making her the voice of the younger generation and the hope for change. We can also argue that she is a representative of the inspector. The representation means that she takes the place, all because Remember that the inspector leaves before the end of the play, he leaves during act 3 to allow the characters to take responsibility or not and we can clearly see that Shakespeare as Sheila takes the place. responsibility as evidenced by the quote and she continues to hit, although that is not very formal, she continues to emphasize Priestley's message, which is the message of the inspectors, so we have reached the sixth grade here and she represents the message of the inspectors , which is Priestley's message, and also represents the younger generation's idea of ​​hope, here comes grade seven, eight, nine. ideas and they have to do with the younger generation and whether the inspector's lesson has really been learned, so I have only argued that she learns that lesson, but the end of the play makes us question that Gerald says that everything is fine now, Sheila, maintain.

Above the ring, what's wrong with this ring? Sheila doesn't just turn him down, she says no, not yet, it's too early. I have to think that now the priest does this to force us to ask, well, what do we think he will do for sure if he has learned the inspector's lesson? she can't go back to Gerald because he represents everything, but the inspector rejects him; he is still confirmed as a capitalist; she still doesn't think she did much wrong with his affair and certainly thinks Sheila should marry him and just forgive him. him, so there is no real Gilbert, if she accepts the patriarchal society, she will marry him and that means that ultimately he will not continue with the inspector's lesson, she will give in, well what evidence do we have that she I might as well see what she says that when she finds out about the affair now you've at least been honest and I believe what you told us about the way you helped her at first just out of pity, now what I showed you about Gerald is that there is no way that he has simply helped her.

Too bad this was totally premeditated, he took her to his friend's apartment as soon as he had the first chance and then got rid of her as soon as his friend returned, so I strongly suggest that she is lying to herself and society. has encouraged her to lie to herself because women in this patriarchal society always have to lie to themselves about their men, they have to pretend that they have some kind of equal relationship where the reality is quite different and that can be easily seen in my other videos analyzing mrs. Berlin, for example, as an audience we find it very difficult to agree with her assessment of the magazine's motives and that final restrained sentence also suggests that she herself does not believe it to be its true motive, so simply out of pity it is reduced, It doesn't have a verb in it and that suggests that she doesn't really believe what she's saying on a subconscious or unconscious level, she doesn't believe her own words and then she says and it really was my fault that she was so desperate when you first met her.

Maybe, it's true, it was her fault when Gerald met her because Sheila had

made

us act from Mill Ward's, but she blames herself more than Gerald and that, I would say, is a symbol of how women behave in a world patriarchal. In society they are taught from birth to blame themselves more than men, so all three of these quotes taken together really suggest to me that she will accept Gerald's offer of marriage. Another thing that suggests she does is the second death of Eva Smith and me. Later I will explain how that works symbolically to suggest that Sheila does, in fact, marry Gerald and therefore the future does not change, it remains capitalist and a younger generation like Sheila and Eric do not create a socialist future.

Well, surprisingly, I'm going to deal with that. the inspector with just one quote, you would need more than that in an essay, but you can easily reach grades 8 and 9 just with this quote with very deep analysis. I have a separate video about that which you can find on my channel, but let's dive into these eyes, the last words, we do not live alone, we are members of one body, we are responsible for each other and I tell you that the time will soon come when, If men do not learn that lesson, then they will be taught with fire, blood and anguish so that we can easily adopt the opinion that this is an attack on capitalism and we are automatically in grade 5 territory.

Now I will give you some other interpretations that the They will take you beyond that. so the first is the Christian interpretation, this phrase we are members of one body comes directly from the Bible and it also comes directly from the church service when Christian congregations take communion now 80% of Priestley's audience is Christian in that moment and that's why he deliberately uses language that you are used to to make an absolute connection what he is saying is that socialism is the same as Christianity, therefore, if you are a Christian human being, I know that 80% of you they are, then it is your duty to think like a socialist because we share the same view of life, in fact it is the same view of how people should treat each other, this of course is another attack on capitalism, it says that capitalism is anti-Christian, if you are a capitalist you are not behaving in a Christian way, so there is a really powerful argument for why you use that language, a great analysis of the language for you and a little bit of context.

Now the other context that students often forget is that this play is not just about capitalism and socialism, but it is also an attack on war which is why we have this phrase of fire, blood and anguish which he suggests. This is where capitalism leads directly to war. Now I'll explain it a little later in my section on capitalism, but for now you need to know which inspector says war. it is a natural consequence of capitalism if you believe in capitalism and therefore exploiting people for financial gain well war is another way you can exploit people for financial gain so this is an anti-war play and that's why these are the last words that The Inspector Speaks says, it's about the wall, so if you start writing about this, we're automatically in grade seven, eight, nine territory.

The other thing is that this is also an attack on patriarchal society. You may not have noticed, but this word is not man, man. means all men and not all women, they are men and what he is saying here is that it is not good meat to persuade women like Sheila because they have no power in 1912, you will know about the suffragettes who were campaigning for the vote and the women not. he didn't get the vote until much later in 1928, so Priestley is arguing very strongly here that war is men's fault and also that capitalism is men's fault;

It is men who have all this financial power and all this political power and that is what is wrong in society. What I am saying is that men and women do not have the same influence and power. Men are the problem. The problem is the patriarchal society. My work shows that we must get rid of it. Well, here you have three separate perspectives that can be easily graduated in this section. capitalism you're really going to expect this to come up on the exam because this is a full essay that I'm giving you here so first we'll start with his reference to the Titanic being absolutely unsinkable now this is a metaphor for capitalism so he believes that the Capitalism is unsinkable but Priestley is trying to suggest that it is sinkable, we can get rid of it and move on to socialism.

A more sophisticated point is to take that image of the Titanic and actually say that the preacher wants it to be a metaphor for the class system, so it's not so much an issue that he wants to get rid of, but that he actually wants to get rid of the way in which people think of each other so that we are members of one body, is much more important as a message because it shows that the The class system is wrong because it sees that different parts of the body are more important. He wants to get rid of that class system to create an egalitarian society and that ties directly into the patriarchy that we've been talking about throughout the video.

Additionally, Sacerdote also uses Burling to discredit capitalism, which is why Burling says there is a lot of talk about possible labor problems in the near future. This, of course, is a dramatic irony because the audience knows that there were many industrial problems in 1912, there were a huge number of strikes and that is, of course, the year in which the play takes place, so it seems ridiculous, and then in 1926 there was a huge general strike that paralyzed the country, a large number of industries just stopped because millions of people went on strike and this, of course. is deeply ingrained in the audience's memory and that's why they know thatBurling is completely wrong and therefore what he represents for capitalism is also completely wrong and finally he says that a time of increasing prosperity awaits us and the audience knows it is completely wrong because of the great oppression that, as you know, started in 1929;

However, it is not just a dramatic irony because Burling does not say that the entire country will achieve this prosperity. Know that here we are referring to what he said before. which is us, the employers, and in fact, the employers had greater prosperity because people still needed to buy basic things like clothing, which of course is what Burling's business sells, so the same men who turned out very well of the depression were those who were called tough. Stanley Baldwin-headed businessmen, you remember from the beginning of the video, so Burling is right here: we businessmen really make a lot of money, and as you'll see later in the video, they made a lot of money too. because they are going to war and war will be an extension of capitalism, it will be capitalism by other means, let's see how it will work, then it says that we have everything to lose and nothing to gain from war, well this again points to Burling's stupidity because what he is saying here is actually false, there is a lot to be gained from war and Priestley shows his audience that with a lot of cleverness we can find it with this bit of language analysis by looking at the word lose and win well.

The language of profit and loss is the language of business, the language of capitalism, so the use of this language of profit and loss shows that Burling does not fully understand capitalism. There were huge profits in the war, like Stanley Baldwin's illusion. The business now shows that if you think there are ten million soldiers fighting, they would need more than one uniform each, probably imagine the great help to Burling's business that will create 10 millions of uniforms, all made by companies like Berlin and Crofts, and then when you add in the companies that make guns and tanks and, you know, rifles, you can soon see that many rich industrialists made an absolute fortune from the war.

Another way to look at it is that to maintain their profits they actually needed a wall and that's what Priestley is suggesting here that capitalism works best when countries fight because so many more things need to be made and then they get destroyed and so Therefore, it is necessary to manufacture more things, which is why war is the ideal market for a capitalist economy. Now, of course you can. It's not still a war because eventually you don't have enough people to buy the products you're creating, so in a capitalist society you need periodic wars, not permanent wars, and that's exactly what Priestley is about.

We have a big war here. in 1912 great and then another in 1939 that satisfied the needs of capitalist businessmen and there is another brilliant level of irony when Burling talks about airplanes that could go anywhere and watches the way automobiles keep getting bigger and faster and then you send out all these things that are real industrial advances that are created by capitalism. You know, companies do these things efficiently and well because that's how they're going to make money, but also think about these things, these are the things that made the war possible and that made the world war possible, it meant that the war It could be exported by airplanes, cars, bigger and faster ships.

Now this is exactly how we have a world war instead of a local war, so capitalism actually makes war bigger and worse, which is why Priestley presents Burling as an idiot. because he doesn't realize this but he wants his audience to realize that capitalism needs war and therefore if as an audience you don't want war you should stop believing in capitalism and start pursuing socialism and that's a really powerful message in the end. of the second world war in which millions of people have died and of course that is exactly when this play is performed, we can also see a different attack on capitalism when Burling points out that we were paying the usual rates and if they didn't like those fees could go work somewhere else, so he is talking about strikers like Eva who wanted more money, so this shows how Burling justifies the firing and shows how capitalism is wrong.

Well, that's our sixth grade point, let's jump to seventh grade and beyond, what's happening. In reality, there is now a cartel. What does a cartel mean? When companies band together to manipulate the market and turn it in their favor, so that if they had to pay different wages depending on the value of the workers, then someone like Sheila could get more money. to another job, but because the biggest employers in Bromley are actually Burling's and Crofts, what they did was they came together and said: "we are going to pay our workers the same rate and therefore they will not have an incentive to move from one job". from one company to another and therefore companies will not have to pay more money to attract the best workers, they will be able to retain the best workers and pay them low rates, so it is a win-win for the companies but a loss for the workers . because workers will never be able to earn more by being better at their job and they can't move on to a better job because the other employers won't pay them more money, which means all the factory owners are paying Eva and the thousands of other women who work in their factories with a salary that is barely enough to survive with hardly any savings and we know that this is true because Burling and Gerald talk about it when they laugh about how the strike couldn't last more than a couple of weeks. because they both know that with the money they get they couldn't have savings that would last more than a couple of weeks, that's appalling and it's a cartel that's actually illegal and Priestley is pointing out that the businessmen get away with it illegally. activities once you have a capitalist system Eric responds that it's not if you can't go to work somewhere else then he knows there is a cartel operating and this is Priestley's point, once you start giving this power to men , they will start abusing him and I think this is also the reason why he chooses to set the play in an industry that employs women.

He's trying to point out that it's not just the working class and they're exploited, that exploitation is much worse if you're a woman and that's because the people in power are overwhelmingly male because this is a patriarchal society. Well, before addressing these four degrees seven, eight and nine, let's look at the criterion of degree 789, so in your essay you have to write a well-structured argument and that means that you have to start with the points of view that you have as a thesis, so you need to write about your views and I have shown you that in each and every analysis you need at least two interpretations, which again I have shown you.

In each analysis you need very good evidence, which were the quotes I showed you now. You should also include the end of the text, which I'll move on to next, that's the last thing and the reason I'm saving it. To last is that if you don't really write about the end of the text, you can't write about the whole assignment and you can't get full marks, so that's very important, don't forget that you have to write about the end. by the way, you have to really concentrate on individual words and phrases and I have tried to show you that by continuing with these bits of language analysis that I have done as usual, you need more than one interpretation and I have shown you that throughout the process you also need to write about the form, so why is it written as a play and I'll get into that in the next part of the video, you need to write about the structure and I'll get into that in a lot more depth in the next part of the video and you must write using the correct terminology.

Well, I've been giving it to you as we go through, for example, the word proxy for the ao3 context again, you see it needs more than one interpretation and therefore your thesis will argue why one interpretation is better than the other. Context means anything about the life of the author or the society about the time or the literature at the time and that, of course, includes the Bible, so we've already covered a lot of that and finally in your conclusion you have to say why. one interpretation is more convincing than another and I have tried to do that in the way that I have structured the interpretations of the fifth and sixth grades here and then what I hope is more convincing the seven, eight and nine on the other.

Now I just want to walk you through the greens, so my greens are for when things happen more than once and what you'll see is interpretation and thesis, interpretation and thesis that give you the answer. The grades in ao3, the interpretation gives you the grades in o2 and the interpretation and the thesis gives you the grade in oh, so guess what happens if you have more than one interpretation and a really good thesis, it is almost inevitable that you will finish. with a grade of seven unless of course you don't prove anything in your thesis, but you will because you've watched this video, in fact we're 43 minutes in, if you're still watching this video you're definitely getting the grade because people If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you've already given up.

You are here because you are doing well. On the other side of capitalism we have the idea of ​​socialism and this is really relevant to the general election of 1945. I heard myself mention that several times and it will be relevant to any essay title you get, but remember that socialism is also a form of stop the war. In Priestley's mind, socialist society will not use financial reasons to go to war. I would be much more upset about the consequences for people, about how we will destroy our only body because the death of one person affects us all, but after all, the theme of the play is that Eve's death affects everyone and that is what you are trying to show. us as a reason not to go to war as a society, you may have seen the characters as deadly sins.

I have other videos that go over that, I'm not going to go over it now, but this characterizes the play as a morality play which means that the priest is teaching a lesson, so there is another purpose of the play: to teach a moral lesson, of There is a work of morality, but it is also eating to teach a political lesson about socialism and the fight against war, obviously it is also linked. to Christianity and we are going to argue that he uses these Christian symbols because he is linking Christian belief with socialist belief and saying that if you are a Christian you must also be a socialist because the ideas match exactly now, let's get into the structure. now you won't need all these points, but any one of these points will take you to the seventh grade in the light bulb, so Burling's words summon the inspector, yes, when he tells Eric and Gerald this, that's when the inspector suddenly appears like for something supernatural. contacts as if he had been listening from another dimension and appears to prove that this belief is wrong, so this ties in with the idea that the inspector is a ghost that you got from ghoul and that links us directly to the novel A Tale of Christmas where Dickens uses a series of ghosts to teach the main character Scrooge more lessons about how to take good care of other people.

It's the same moral lesson that Priestley is teaching and he knows that his readers will be familiar with a Christmas cow, probably 99% of his readers would. If he had read the book and people had won the play, he would have read the book, so he is using a literary allusion that he knows all his readers will understand and that helps make the moral purpose of his work clear why he decides that The inspector disappears. This means that he can keep the inspector until the end, right?, but he chooses not to. Well, this again is about free will, so he allows the inspector to disappear to give the characters free will to decide if they should take responsibility for Eva's death. or if they shouldn't and what I'm going to argue is that as soon as they don't take responsibility, a new phone call occurs and we'll deal with that in more detail below, why does Priestley introduce the idea of ​​the inspector showing separate photographs well, is to give Gerald this false idea that they could in fact have been different girls, it allows Gerald to not take responsibility and then convince the others not to take responsibility, however if you look at all of Eva's descriptions and not just what she looks like, but when she was employed and where she came from in the country and her parents were dead and all that, everything that each character hears matches what each character already knows about her in other words, obviously They are the same person as me.

I have videos showing that he does it to give Gerald an out, a way to deceive himself, but also to let the audience know that this is self-deception. We know that she must have been the same girl because of all the descriptions that appear below.continuation. I need to consider why Eric's reveal comes last, as I mentioned above. I think Priestley does that simply to show that Eric's exploitation of Eva is much worse than anyone else's and also the logical conscience of such a priestly patriarchal society is arguing that once people are dehumanized by cheating , treating them as inferior to you and once you turn them into commodities that you can make money from, the logical consequence of that is what Eric does to Eva and the logical consequence of that is despair and eventual suicide.

Okay, now we come to that second phone call well, just like the inspector is summoned by the words of Bolling I'm going to argue that Gerald regrets that the second phone call is summoned by the words of Gerald and Sheila the second phone call is signaled with a ring and the word ring is in the stage direction let's go back to Gerald and Sheila's words, everything is fine now Sheila is holding the ring what's wrong with this ring? No, not yet, it's too early, so what's happening here is that the second phone call happens when Sheila decides she's going to take the That's my reading of this section, you don't have to agree with her, but I think which is very interesting because it explains why the second phone call happens, so the second phone call happens because Sheila doesn't fully learn the inspector's lesson because I think she eventually chooses to marry Gerald and therefore that second death happens now the second death occurs because it is a symbol of the two world wars, then the first world war is symbolized by the first death of Eve and in the second world war it happens. because society did not learn the lessons of World War I and that is reflected in the fact that the Burlings did not learn the lessons of the first treatment they gave Eva.

A more complete analysis of that is in the video of my inspector's calls that I will have linked here. I have seen the eyes appear and finally why is it set in 1912 instead of 1930 because all the points would have been just as valid if it had been set just before the war and the last words of the inspectors about learning by fire, blood and anguish, blah, blah, blah. All of that would have been relevant if the play had been set in 1937, well it's because it's pre-WWI and he wants to write about both wars, so setting it in 1912 is a big clue to the audience he wants to target. what we think World War I as well as World War II and so we can clearly see that Eve's two deaths represent those two wars in In other words, this tells the audience that we are not only talking about capitalism, this play is also a play against war and if you want to get rid of war you have to stop thinking in a capitalist way and start thinking in a socialist way and finally this.

It links us to the form, the form of the work is more or less a work of morality and is didactic. Didactic means it is there to teach a lesson, so Priest wants to teach through this play and therefore chooses these elements of the morality play like the seven mortals. sins and the elements of this moral novel like a Christmas carol with the ghost to indicate to its audience that this is not just entertainment, it is a play with a message, a political message, a teaching message, okay, so we have made one. two three four and five and now six how can you get all my guides, each one of them free on Amazon?

How does it work well? It works like this. You get a 30-day free trial, so within 30 days all your exams. will end and that means without paying a cent you can get all the guides that are on Amazon as free ebooks because you can cancel your membership after your 30 day free trial so yes you can get all my review guides but Look , I write one type of review on Amazon and you can get all these types of review and this must go on forever, so every subject you study, there are 400 pages available here, you can get each one of them with your money.

Well of course that would also mean I get absolutely no money, although Amazon will give me some if you use a link in my description, so if that service sounds brilliant to you and why not, pop in via the link in my description and then Amazon will give me more than the 35p I normally get if you buy a guide, so I hope this was the most useful video I've ever made about glasses and if you've made it this far. You will definitely get grade 7 or higher. I'm very excited for you. Thanks for sticking with me.

Don't forget to subscribe if you want more and good luck on those exams.