VERDICT & PERJURY: How Amber Heard VS Johnny Depp Cases EXPOSED - NEW Evidence NOT in trial

Do you consider that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation? Answer yes. Today's

verdict

confirms what we have said all along that the allegations against Johnny Depp are defamatory and not supported by any

evidence

. If he takes pictures, if he did it didn't happen. take pictures they're fake if you didn't tell your friends you're lying if you told your friend they're part of the hoax he wants you to believe everyone else is blind Did Rocky tell you Amber Heard was having? a cara de la vigne affair while she was still married to Johnny Depp yes, you changed the locks on the penthouses on May 22, that's why you felt comfortable having James Franco on the night of May 22, 2016.

The lady

heard

that I don't know when James arrived. finished, let us remember that it is a story of two

trial

s, all the

evidence

arrived in the United Kingdom. I have the right as an American to talk about what happened to me, to own my story and my true lives will be built on the lies that I am. obsessed with the truth, is there any other way to interpret this

verdict

? However, this jury who

heard

Amber Heard did not believe a single foreign word. Wow, we have a verdict. The trip came back and they unanimously discovered that Amber Heard did in fact defame Johnny Depp. on all three counts, okay, so let's dive into the verdict, the backlash, some of the damning evidence that never made it to

trial

and your questions that you were tweeting me about and I'll tell you that, as you know, sometimes we take Petty University, okay, class is in session, so we have a lot of things I want to dig into, so let's hear a quick word from today's amazing sponsor, June's Journey.

Everyone will love this and then we'll face Plant directly in the video. June's Journey is a hidden object mystery game set in the 1920s, where you have to find objects that are hidden in scenes like a real crime detective. I mean, what could be more fun, since we've been looking for clues all month in this case and now we can make our detective dreams come true with this super fun mobile game that is free to download and is also very relaxing, ya that takes you back in time to the glamor of the 1920s as you solve crimes with a very diverse experience. cast of characters and each new scene takes you deeper into these exciting murder mystery stories.

I mean, honey, who doesn't want to play detective? Okay, he's a little challenging but not too much so it keeps it really fun. I literally play this game any time I want. to de-stress my brain from working all day is like my little escape from the chaos of life and delve into these real world

cases

and let's be honest, there is something super satisfying about fighting hidden objects and clues. I love it so join me and download June's Journey for free with my link in the description box, trust me you will love this game so have fun honey okay back to the dock no matter what happens.

I came here and told the truth. what I've been carrying on my back for six years, okay, let's jump right into this and we're going to start right out the door with the verdict just for everyone in the gallery, mine, this is a court of law, regardless of the verdict . I won't tolerate any outbursts at all, okay, I thought this moment was very revealing. Here you could see that everyone else's eye contact is going towards the jury, but we see Amber break her eye contact away from the jury and that told me that right there she was like Okay, I feel like they're not looking at her, which means which probably have not ruled in your favor.

Mr. Depp's claim against Ms. Hedge. Do you think Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation? Yes. The statement was made or published by Ms. Hedge. Yes, the statement was about Mr. Depp yes, this statement was false yes the statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp yes, do you consider that Mr. Depp has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he misheard and acted wrongly? real malice? yeah, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow. I still feel exactly how I felt when I first saw the verdict. I think I tweeted uh my reactions wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow and you can quote me on that, um, but I was surprised that Johnny won.

On all three counts of defamation, it is an incredibly difficult thing to prove in the classic defamation

cases

way, especially if he is a public figure. I was also surprised when they discovered that yes, Johnny, through representing attorney Adam Waldman, had defamed Amber. find that she misheard has demonstrated all the elements of defamation answer no to this statement appearing in the April 27, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail do you find that Ms. heard has proven all the elements of defamation answer yes, Oh, it's just that it's a lot? 10 million dollars now gave Johnny 5 million as punishment, but there is a limit in the state of Virginia that has a limit of 350,000, so the actual sentence that was handed down that Amber has to pay is 10 million three hundred fifty thousand. and Johnny in the countersuit has to pay 2 million dollars to Amber now, as far as I know, the judge clearly indicated to the jury that there is a limit of 350,000, that's why Elaine in her closing arguments for Amber said that we are only looking for between 300 and two thousand dollars, which was a little funny when Elaine said we're only looking for 350.

You're only looking for that because that's all you can get. I thought it was very telling that Johnnyside said, look, not him. He didn't want any punishment and the jury said that was fine, but we were still going to award him five million dollars and I think that was sending a message that you know punitive damages, punitive damages, are meant for punishment. This is like you shouldn't have done what you did and now you will be punished but of course they are limited in the 350 D. Now let's take a quick look at the summary of the jury sheet for Amber's counterclaim that concerned this quote from Adam Waldman, so this was referring to the cell phone incident, simply put, this was an ambush, a hoax, they set up Mr.

Debb by calling the police, but the first attempt didn't work. Officers arrived at the attics, searched and interviewed them thoroughly, and left after seeing no damage to deal with. or property, so Amber and her friends spilled some wine and trashed the place now, if you all remember in my last doc, when I was analyzing the damning evidence, Amber or Amber's lawyers used the same photo of the spilled wine on two incidents. on the ground floor of the main apartment on December 15, 2015. Do you remember that testimony? Yes, I think you've seen this photograph too, right? So this is a photograph that was used for the December 15th incident and this was a photo that was used in a May 21st incident as you can see, it's the same damn photo that you testified that this photograph reflected spilled wine and Penthouse 5 on May 21, 2016.

Didn't Exhibits 512 and 725 appear to be you and the defendants? different versions of the same image, are they not correct? So which is which was taken on December 15, 2015 or May 21, 2016? If you remove the redacted metadata you may find out it's there or if it's telling the truth you'll know that you can't use the same photo in two incidents because there can only be one incident it applies to so Amber and her friends spilled some came and battered the place, they got their stories straight from a lawyer's address. and publicist she called her publicist and then made a second call to 9-1-1.

Now Amber, of course, testified that she never called 9-1-1. I didn't call 9-1-1. I didn't call the police. I refused to cooperate with them to protect Johnny I'm protected Johnny I didn't call them once and I didn't call them twice I didn't mistreat the place I cleaned the place I didn't even know the second The police would come if they wanted to get something from him. He wanted a hoax Johnny, why wouldn't he cooperate with the police? Wouldn't he say something to the police when he does more damage to the house and then just knocks down the things that You saw pictures of that, it doesn't make sense, there have been a lot of people angry, of course, because Amber won in this claim, but I think What the jury was really saying here is that they don't believe Amber and her friends set up quite a scandal. incident.

You know, when I was watching this incident, I really didn't think it happened that way. I did a lot of research into this incident. I was going to delve into it, but then you know things moved too. quickly so we could get that out in time, so I think that's what the jury was saying here and they said, yeah, I don't know, I just don't know if that was the case as the trials go at the end. of the day the jury has the final say I'm not sitting in this courtroom snickering I'm not sitting in this courtroom laughing smiling making sarcastic jokes I'm not uh here's a question I got on Twitter can you please comment on the differences among his statements posted on his IGS after I think True Colors shines thank you, what a day Petty, you know what state he's in, Petty, I love it, yes, let's talk about his statements, so let's take a look at Johnny's statement on Instagram six years ago, my life, the life of.

My children, the lives of the people closest to me, and also the lives of the people who for many years have supported me and believed in me changed forever, all in the blink of an eye. False, very serious and criminal criminal accusations against me through the media. which triggered an endless barrage of hate content, although no charges were ever brought against me, I had already traveled around the world twice in a nanosecond and it had a seismic impact on my life and career and six years later the jury returned me the life. I feel truly honored.

Those are very, very powerful words right off the bat. The goal of bringing this case was to reveal the true truth, regardless of the outcome. I am overwhelmed by the outpouring of love and the colossal support and kindness from everyone. I hope that my quest to tell the truth has helped other men or women and I think that is a very important distinction. I think Johnny and Johnny's side has been the only one to recognize that it's not just women who can be victims, I hope too. that the position will now go back to being innocent until proven guilty and I think it's important to apply that to both sides.

I think a lot of people just decided that Amber was guilty without hearing a single piece of evidence and people who never saw the trial or were already like oh well that's guilty and that's like me, you should look at the evidence, you should weigh it and make an informed opinion. , if you are going to make an opinion. The best is yet to come and the new chapter has finally begun, really. never perish hand signed by Johnny Depp Now, in contrast, let's look at Amber's statement. The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken because the mountain of evidence that she and her and Elaine continue on this mountain of evidence.

Heartbroken because the mountain of evidence still wasn't enough to address the disproportionate influence of my ex-husband's power and influence and I think they're going to continually lean on him having all the power that she had, but I think that It also discredits the power Amber had. She is also a famous and famous public figure. She had quite a bit of power. She did a full press tour when the allegations came out. She was paid thirty thousand dollars each to talk about DV. She had a lot of power, although I understand that global stature is like an artist and work and money, obviously Johnny had more prestige, more money and therefore more power.

I think the power dynamic argument ignores a very important crucial element in those relationships. you don't always adhere to the power Dynamics and structure of someone's financial means and we are dealing with a man who very freely gave his money his resources he let all of Amber's friends live in his houses this is a man who was very generous with his money Gabe Amber cars and ignores the fact that there are relationships where the breadwinner is abused by the person who is not a breadwinner, if we were to say well because he makes more money, he has all the power, therefore it is inherently abusive, is very Dismissive of the fact that there are people who are the providers in a relationship who are taken advantage of in that relationship.

Relationship power is very different than status and the power of wealth. Yes, they are all factors that we must take into account, but please do not take them. one and assume that inherently means that the month with the most money and the most notoriety will also be the abuser, that's not how it works and I think it's a dangerous narrative that people have been pushing, the abuser doesn't have to be the one with fame and notoriety maybe they become abusive because they don't have those things and they resent their partner and at the same time I would say that well if that were true if Johnny had all the Power and therefore powerful men in this case are always protected, then whyThe devils threw him into the dumpsters of hell when the allegations first came to light and for many years he lived with that reputation completely destroyed in the press, media and much of the public? opinion, then goes on to say that I am even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women.

It's a setback. It turns back the clock to a time when a woman who talked and talked could be publicly shamed and humiliated. I support the idea that against women should be taken seriously. I'm a little baffled to think that Amber thought that what happened in her individual case as a person inherently sets all women back, just the whole gender, the whole gender is going. down, it's okay, we just go, we go down, it's okay, let's rest, we go out, we need to be able to look. in individual cases and individual results exactly that is perfect at all, the jury system does not fail at all, but to think that its verdict just eliminate all the women.

I do not agree with that. I think Johnny's lawyers got the jury to miss the key issue. of freedom of speech and ignoring the evidence that was so conclusive that we won in the UK the UK trial was not yours to win I'm not leaving, let's go ahead and dispel that right now the UK trial was not against Amber, okay, that was against the sun. I am sad that I lost this case, but I am even sadder because it seems that I have lost the right that I thought I had as an American to speak freely and openly.

This was a completely new narrative that Amber and her team decided to put into practice. On the last day, I have the right as an American to speak about what happened to me, to own my story and my truth. I have that right, all of a sudden she's talking about I have that right as an American and I thought, I'm sorry, where is this narrative coming from because it's brand new and I don't know why you're introducing this approach at the last minute and then of course, Rottenborn in his closing was talking about First Amendment rights, but I felt good if you have to turn to the Constitution, then I think the case is not going well for you, you know what I mean, let's keep pushing.

I know how many people will come out and say anything for him that's why he wrote the op-ed how many people will come out to support him and fall to his power here's a gouda cheese question which one honey I'm with you Elaine went on a press tour today to explain why Amber Heard lost the trial citing that the jury broke the rule suppressed evidence on social media Deb star power Etc., she also mentions that Amber Heard won the trial in the UK. What do you think about this? Oh, I don't know, I've done well, we may need to do the introduction to this college class and session, okay for some.

The reason why Elaine decided to do a little press tour is kind of like damned if you do, damned if you don't do it right, if Elena has chosen an interesting platform, an interesting podium, if you want to stand up, since she absolutely blames to everyone, including the jury for the verdict that was not in their favor I have no idea what I put in that accent it was a terrible accent but let's listen to Elaine a little, okay Elaine, thank you, we are very glad you are here . Thanks by the way, I fully believe that Elaine did the best she could.

I think Amber was probably a difficult customer. We heard Amber's reaction to yesterday's verdict. This looks to be a big win for Johnny Depp this morning. A setback for women in and out of the courtroom because, basically, what this said, you know, Amber had an enormous amount of evidence, although a lot of it was suppressed in this case, unlike in the United Kingdom, it is Well, I can't, I'm sorry. I'm going to take a moment, Elaine, what were you doing with the press tour? She is pushing the narrative that was in Amber's statement on Instagram, they are pushing the narrative that because Amber lost, that is a blow to all women of all kinds and to all humanity, like me.

I can't understand that narrative. This is where I sit with this. I will never embarrass anyone, esp. I will never shame a survivor of DV or sa, if you are a survivor I won't. You'd be embarrassed if you were on Amber's side. I wouldn't shame you if you were on Johnny's side. The thing is like survivors and again I am a survivor. The thing is that people and survivors identify with whoever they identify with and so when Amber and Elaine here I say that this was a blow to all women everywhere to say that there is a large percentage of survivors included that they identify with Johnny as a victim of abuse and if you say this was a huge blow to all women you are instantly invalidating and discrediting all the survivors who believe in Johnny and it also invalidates the very real idea and we have heard recordings again, it invalidates the idea very real that men can also be victims.

We have to be very careful that saying this particular case erases this individual case. For all the other people, that's not how it works. I think it was bigger than that because you had the evidence like you say, but they didn't believe him. Why do you think they didn't believe him? I think a lot of it was that. It was Johnny Depp, I think celebrity status, but she's also a celebrity and, oh, tell me what it is, Robert or Robert, she's also a celebrity. Robert, she's a celebrity too, right, but you have to remember, we have a tale of two trials. the evidence arrived in the United Kingdom, that is not true.

I mean, a lot of evidence came in from his side, a lot of evidence came in from Johnny's side, so to speak, all the evidence came in, when do you ever see a trial where all of Johnny's evidence came in? all sides come to fruition, that's not how the court works. Mr Debb presented that, the burden of proof was on the sun in the UK because he had been called and he had the opportunity to tell the truth. then, um, and he lost a three-week trial, we weren't allowed to tell the jury that well, it's a different system and the judge, it wasn't a jury, it was a judge, it was substantially true, uh, and that's significant, I think it surprises me. many legal analysts, but you know, in this case the jury not only didn't believe Amber Heard, but by ruling that she acted with actual malice, I mean she intended to cause harm, that's a pretty high standard for approve it and it's quite surprising, given that the op-ed didn't even mention Mr.

Depp, you have to remember that what they learned from the UK case is to demonize Amber, which is what they did, and try to suppress the biggest amount of evidence that came to the United Kingdom and did not enter the United States, but the other problem is that we had cameras. I will point out here that there is a long list of evidence that Elaine filed motions to suppress, including charitable donations that they actively fought to preserve any information about. regarding Amber's charitable donations or lack thereof, they fought to suppress that to keep her out of this trial, they played the game the same way they are accusing Johnny Depp's team and tried to keep crucial evidence out of this case to influence the jury. opinion, so Elaine, now you're pointing the finger girl, so I'm a former NFL player and after a tough loss it's easy to wake up and point the other way, many times I find that the best I could What to do was look at it and reflect what mistakes I made as a player, what mistakes our coaching staff made and then how we can improve from there.

Do you feel like you guys made any mistakes along the way? Do you feel like Amber made a mistake? Plus, you just get it because "You're saying it's the celebrity, it's Johnny, it's the people who support him or what about you and your team. Oh, he came with some heat, it's a fair question, well, and that It's a great question, and you know, Amber even said on the stand." I'm not perfect, I'm a human being, these people were threatening to kill her, they threatened to heat her baby in the microwave. This is a masterclass in how to deflect and not answer the question, but again, don't hold a grudge against Elaine, you gotta do what she can, girl.

Well, this is the kind of social media she was getting, so are any of us perfect? No, is there anything else we feel we should have done? Yes, absolutely, I always redo my zippers a hundred times, but I think there were a lot of influences. here that was out of our control and I think social media was like a Roman Colosseum is the best way to describe the atmosphere here and I have to believe that the jury, even though they were told not to watch anything that Do you know they have weekends, they have families, yes, and the 10 day period that we had, how could they not have been influenced, but Elaine, for most people, the aliens make big claims, she is making accusations of that the jury did not comply with the instructions they were given at the end of each day, that is a very, very serious and burdensome thing to allege against seven people plus alternates to assume that because it didn't go the way you wanted, the jury should having inherently just been checking social media. and therefore social media persuades them to deliver the verdict they did.

I think it's a dangerous narrative. I think it's something she can't prove. I don't think that's the movement. Elaine, the way the depth team approached this was based on ignorance. she completely ignored the cycle and just said oh she wouldn't have done this if he had been hitting her, that was her approach, they thought they weren't fighting with Fair, right. I don't think they were fighting with Fair, um, in fact, he is a survivor of a domestic case yes, I absolutely believe that and there is an enormous amount of evidence, much of which did not make it to this trial, it did make it to the UK trial. .

I hope this city continues, no, let's, this is not true, this is not like that. Not even Robert, I have the right as an American to talk about what happened to me, to own my story and my truth. I have that right now, apart from the lawyer. I'm going to say this. I think Amber lost this case on her own. I think she had many cases where she was clearly lying to the jury. One of the most obvious lies. I did a deep dive into this in regards to settlement money and promise vs. donation, so let's take another look as reported in According to the media, the amount received in the divorce was seven million dollars and they are being donating seven million dollars.

It is virtue that tells me that Amber did not need to make this public statement. Amber chose to make this public statement to express herself in a certain way. Part of me thinks this wasn't virtue signaling and it was actually all kinds of accusations flying at you when you said all this and then there was a divorce settlement where you got seven million dollars, people said it was all for the money, but then he did something that twisted that whole argument. What did you do with that money? Seven million dollars were donated in total. I split it between the ACLU and Children's Hospital Los Angeles.

More power to you because that's something I never wanted. Nothing. in fact, his exact words were: 7 million in total were donated to be divided between the ACLU and Children's Hospital Los Angeles. That's right, that's right. I made that statement as soon as I got divorced and we came to an agreement, that's when I promised him at that time and I promised that I had not donated his entire seven million dollar settlement to charity at that time if that was wrong, no okay, that's a lie, that's being here today. The young lady heard that she has not yet donated the seven. divorce settlement of millions of dollars to charity there it is incorrect I promise in full no I do not intend to fulfill those obligations no that was not the issue stop pressing the presses sitting here today you have not donated the seven million dollars donated not promised donated the seven million dollars divorce settlement with charity boom roast I use commitment and donation synonymous with each other Camille is warming up you haven't donated this seven million dollars donated now promised donated the seven million dollars divorce settlement with charity I use commitment and donation synonyms are not synonymous words, you know, I had a university do the introduction, but we need a lexicon.

I don't know if we need a website, Mr. Webster, because it doesn't mean the same thing as a donation. I mean, we all know that, right? She claims that she did it all. she didn't even sign the commitment form, it's so obvious you're lying and not just because of what she was saying, but the ACLU literally testified and said if she hadn't paid, Children's Hospital literally testified and said they hadn't paid. I didn't pay and when I saw Amber on the stand say that she didn't pay it because Johnny sued her when Johnny hadn't sued her for all these periods, she blamed Johnny for not making those payments and I'm thinking to myself, obviously you're lying, but now you're blaming Johnny and Johnny is claiming that you, Amber, abused him, so if thoseaccusations are true, so that seems to me like an abuser blaming the victim and this is something that the jury saw and you know. here is a testimony from a representative of Children's Hospital regarding those donations that were not made, why did he send a letter to Miss Heard and Miss Godley?

He was trying to facilitate whether the promise was fulfilled or not as of the date of This statement of March 30, 2021, how much in total did you hear the young lady donated to the Children's Hospital? She 250 pounds and she testified that 3.5 million had been paid and here is a letter from Children's Hospital saying that I am following up on correspondence from Children's Hospital. Hospital Los Angeles since the first installment, the CHLA has not received any more installments. I ask her if she knows if chla should expect more installments in her name or if the promise will not be fulfilled.

I appreciate any information on this matter and Amber misled you. Amber ghost from the submerged Children's Hospital came out into the open Amber who promises what I never heard from her you know what I mean if you lie about something so obvious, it was only for me who really went to tell me something about her character remember in cases like This credibility is something very important and we know it thanks to the jury instructions that say that you are the judge of the facts. The credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence. They may consider the appearance and attitude of the witness on the stand.

His intelligence. their opportunity to know the truth and to have observed the things about which they testified their interest in the outcome of the case their bias and whether they have been shown to be inconsistent prior statements or whether they have knowingly testified falsely about any material fact in the case, all This is what the jury must consider when reaching their verdict, you cannot arbitrarily ignore the credible testimony of a witness, however, the comma loves that comma, if you have considered all the evidence in the case, then you can accept or ignore everything or part of the testimony of a witness as he sees fit.

I'm telling you if Stand and You continues to lie according to jury instructions, they could literally choose to throw all of their testimony in the trash and I keep reimagining the power if Amber had sat on that stand and said, you know, why not? that he had every intention of paying him the money. Both charities and I went ahead. I had to know my own bills and expenses. I'm taking care of my family no matter what and I didn't pay them like I promised and I feel really bad about that. to live with this every day of my life I didn't keep my promise I'm someone who really wants to keep my promises if she had been conceited in a bad deed then I think this could have potentially turned out maybe a little different I I don't know, there might not have been had a lot of effect, but at least in peace, the jury would have thought she was a more credible Witness.

Certainly not, and hoping to get the truth out, I went through this again in one of the others. Deep Dives I'm just going to mention it here because I think it's very telling and I think this is something that the jury probably took into consideration when Amber said she didn't want anything to have more power because that's something I've never wanted anything, that too it was a lie. She wanted things. It is documented in a letter that was sent to Johnny Depp. Did you receive this letter on or around May 24, 2016? Yes, it was around that time here is a letter that was sent and look at the demands that were made, furthermore we requested on Amber's behalf the following appropriate pendant light bracket which is money, exclusive use and possession of the black Range Rover, the vehicle you currently drive with Johnny, to continue making all payments for any liens. about exclusive use and possession of the Broadway penthouses, this is the Eastern Columbia building, she wanted numbers one, three and five with Johnny to continue paying mortgage services, etc. associates therein, and a contribution to the reasonable and necessary fees of her attorneys in the amount of one hundred. thousand dollars and 25 thousand dollars for forensic accounting costs to be paid to my company before the close of business on May 27, 2016.

She was given approximately two days to comply with these demands and it was on May 27 that she filed the tro once he didn't. Would she have the right to these things? Of course, California is a community property state. They stupidly didn't get a prenup because she said she didn't want anything for me. She seems like she wanted a lot. If I were a jury, it would be like you know. How else could anyone call this card extra? I'm just who said that, who said that, supposedly, I didn't say that, of course, and on top of that, you know what else the jury saw, the jury saw the testimony of his partner's counselor, a licensed therapist. who testified that Amber asked her in advance what would happen if she filed a claim for abuse by directing her attention to the last bit of that session.

Will he have an advantage if she leaves him but first files a complaint with the police for abuse? That was a question she asked. You, yeah, this was her talking out loud trying to come up with a strategy for herself, this therapist literally testified saying that Amber was asking him, hey, if I filed for divorce, would it help me if I filed an abuse lawsuit sooner? as the therapist put it, the strategy is that something that is out of the question for a potential victim to think about, no, it's not Amber came in and filed a tro to tro emergency request which, by the way, was filed when Johnny I was already out of the country, at some point it is not always like that, but there are times. that people will file an emergency tro as a kind of weapon against the person they're trying to divorce because if you have a tro, it's a little bit more that they can use against the person they're divorcing and trying to get the settlement money. but when you put this on top of the alleged extortion letter uh when you put that on top of her lying about other things I think it wasn't good for her credibility as a witness if everyone I've ever met the people who have supported me suddenly I'm scum for what a little lie never had to happen so yeah very angry grits 94 I hope that's how it was pronounced, as a Swedish person the whole jury system confuses me which is understandable and I would really appreciate it if you could sum it up. there was a little bit here that she said because it's been going around a lot so I'm just going to play this, it's a tale of two trials, all the evidence came in the UK, now the UK court system and the court system from the US are very different.

I'm not going to say one is better than the other, they are just very different in the UK the verdict of the trial was determined by a single 71 year old man in the US the verdict is determined by seven American citizens and the juries are very heavily vetted in a different way than a judge would be vetted, jurors go through, you know, the entire jury selection process, they're asked billions of questions to try to figure out if there's any bias in them and I I would say in many ways. Now it is a much more difficult system to win a case.

The best thing about the UK trial or any trial is that you can read all the transcripts for yourself and come to your own conclusions, but we do know that one thing that greatly influenced the judge's decision. The decision was in regards to Amber claiming and claiming that she had committed and donated all the money to the charity, so it's interesting to me that Elaine says, well, not all of it went into the US trial. and it's like, well, Elaine, you know what didn't go in? the trial in the UK the ACLU testimony the Children's Hospital testimony clarifying that Amber lied so I wonder if the donations influenced the judge's decision what the judge would have thought about Amber's credibility and character if the judge found out who, in fact, lied about it now Regarding the claims that there was evidence not allowed in this trial, I think Elaine forgot that there was an important piece, at least in my opinion, a piece of evidence, a recording that was not allowed in this trial.

Now this is from the finger incident in Australia. I did a full deep dive on this, if you're interested I'll link it below. There were some incredible inconsistencies that were happening in the testimony around that incident. I thought this recording had very damning evidence against Amber. In her testimony we saw that. From very early on she said that she would never take MDMA. I would never take MDMA with him. I would never take MDMA with it. But I did some research. This is not true, at least from what it appears now in this recording. This was when Dr.

Kipper, Nurse Debbie, JJ and some other people, Ben King, come to the house after the big destruction and they're trying to find the finger and get Johnny to the hospital and there's this recording on their phone and you literally hear Amber say. For, Jerry, to judge that he was doing all kinds of substances, this is what he says, some stock quotes, so he says he found empty bags of, you know, the white stuff, he blames Johnny, so To me that is very clearly proof that he lied. The United States maintains a trust check, so again Los Angeles and here is the evidence that was not allowed into the trial in the US.

If the jury had heard that, that would have made them question Amber's testimony regarding the Australia incident. Now this is a photo that Amber took in the aftermath of the Australia incident where Johnny was gone, you know, and it was like writing in blood and doing all these things and Johnny had written all these things. On the mirror there is red lipstick written, the writing is completely different. I firmly believe Amber wrote this and what I pointed out in the previous video call Carly Simon said it best babe. In all the recordings, Amber was the only one I heard between the two of them who called the other person a babe.

I'm sorry I didn't cross my face in a proper slot, but she was hitting you, she wasn't hitting you, baby, you're not hit, she called Johnny baby, quite often on the recordings, I never heard Johnny call her baby, so It sounds like this. like something she probably wrote, but another thing about this that Amber testified in the US this all supposedly happened to her took some sleeping pills went to sleep woke up late the next day went downstairs and heard Johnny playing Marilyn Manson music at full volume. I remember, uh, taking a lot of sleeping pills, not many, which is a lot for me.

I don't remember falling asleep, but I know I fell asleep because I woke up the next day. I guess it was late in the morning. I could hear it. downstairs I could hear Marilyn Manson's music, not in person, I could hear the music, maybe he said it was Maryland or maybe I could recognize, I don't remember, but I realized that's what I was hearing, it was full blast volume and then she also testified that I didn't write call Carly Simon and I didn't even know who Carly Simon was and if you had anything to do with writing that red anything before this trial did you know who Carly Simon was?

I could have listened to her music but no I didn't, did you know what songs Carly Simon wrote or sang? No you had to tell me thank you here's the thing so Carly Simon wrote the song you're so lazy Johnny I'm not kidding Johnny literally recorded a version of that song with Marilyn Manson and he recorded the version after they started dating, which means that Amber most likely heard that recording and therefore for her to say that she doesn't know who Carly Simon is, she doesn't know the song, the reference is strong. Question that, not only does your boyfriend and then your husband record a version of the song that you say you don't know, but she testified that when she came downstairs Johnny was blasting Marilyn Manson and is there a chance that Johnny was playing that song at full volume?

You are absolutely so vain and Amber could have gotten mad and put on her lipstick and said call Carly Simon she said it best baby I mean Carly made the song better baby leave me a comment let me know what you think about it. kinda there my goal is the truth I pride myself on honesty I lied to build on lies and build on lies I'm obsessed with the truth There was some other testimony that I thought was particularly compelling Amber's latest statements about her when she appeared to testify for the second time versus the very beginning of Johnny's statements about the truth this is how Amber puts it the right to tell my story I have the right to say what happened to me I will write in my voice and my name was taken long enough I have the right as an American to talk about what happened to me to own my story and my truth she has the right to tell my truth I thought it was a very interesting thing to say here we are on trial we are in court We don't want to hear your truth, we want to hear the truth, to That's what the judicial system is set up to do, to get to the truth, because there's always the truth and then there's my truth, so in contrast, that's how Johnny set up this whole case my goal is the truth my goal is the truth I pride myself on honesty I pride myselffrom my cell phone the truth the truth is the only thing that interests me lies will get you nowhere, but lies are based on lies, on lies, they are too There is a lot to cover.

I am obsessed with the truth. There is a big difference. There is. Amber says I have the right to speak my truth. Johnny says I want to tell the truth and that may have stayed with the jury. Everyone knows that Morgan Tremaine was already the former TMZ. employee who testified regarding the source of the cabinet slamming video, heavily implying that Amber, who was the original copyright owner of that video, leaked it to TMZ and we also know that Morgan had the clap of the century, let's look at that one more time because it's worth it, did you know that these cases are televised?

I'm aware there are cameras, so this gives you your 15 minutes of fame objection, Elaine, um, so I won't gain anything from this. In fact, I'm putting myself in a sort of The goal of TMZ is a very litigious organization and I'm not looking for 15 minutes here, although you can speculate. You could say the same thing when taking on Amber Heard as a client. A bit argumentative, don't you think? oh, I don't find that to be purely logical, thanks for the applause last century for seeing how someone got it into Petty University. I know this trial was very, very serious for everyone involved, but there are these little moments, a little respite. of air and we need this as humans, sometimes we need to break the seriousness with a laugh here and there, it's a survival mechanism, so I was curious to see his opinion on the verdict and he tweeted.

I immediately burst into tears, which I firmly believe is emotional for everyone involved, no matter what side they're on. I don't know what role I really played in all of this, but I spoke my truth and I feel like a weight has been lifted from my shoulders with this case. In the end, I think Amber's team came out with unbiased lawyers if I just listen to them present the cases, Johnny Depp's team all worked so brilliantly together and I think the jury really understood that. I think they were also able to present Johnny's case in a very linear way that made sense.

They broke it down very easily and I think Elaine in particular didn't make things easy to follow. We know that, of course, the case presented is very important. but just as the important thing is how the jury relates to the lawyers or how they like them, and if they don't like the style they adopt, if they can't follow it, or if they get bored, all of these things come into play in the way a jury , ultimately factors your decision. decision, it's just that you know human nature, although shortly after the verdict was handed down, the lead attorney and Camille Vasquez held a press conference that was short and sweet, let's take a look.

Today's verdict confirms what we have said all along that the claims against Johnny Depp are defamatory and are not supported by any evidence. We are very grateful to the jury for their careful deliberation, and to the judge and court staff who have dedicated an enormous amount of time and resources to this case. Our judicial system is based on each one. a person's right to have his case heard and we were very honored to help Mr. Depp ensure that his case was fairly considered throughout the trial. We are also very pleased that the trial has resonated with so many people and with the public who value the truth. and Justice now that the jury has reached its conclusive verdict it is time to turn the page and look to the future thank you very much everyone and thank you to the jury thank you very much short and sweet statement I thought it was everything it should have been and nothing more, and Amber's side didn't make a statement perfectly within their rights and now we've seen Elaine doing a little press tour, now I did know in my last video, uh, regarding some damning evidence, uh, that there was a text message between Johnny and Dr.

Kipper that I found particularly unpleasant where he said: "You know, here I forgot to say that last night I had a hopefully very positive and ego-free squawk with Amber that went very well and then I triggered a fight in a club on Sunset Boulevard, so I posted that on the video and said, obviously, there's no excuse for saying something like that. I think that would be absolutely disgusting. Now several of you pointed out that he could have actually been referring to a drink, there's a. Negroni. black hair and of course the word negro means black, so I think when I look at the text from time to time I took some photos of Sunset Boulevard, I think it's very possible that that was in reference to having some drinks, right?

So I wanted to make sure I made that clarification at the same time, because I personally take these things into account. I can't make the same clarification with Amber. There were some tweets that Amber made that I think were blatantly racist. This goes for me. lying about promises to Children's Hospital and saying something racist on Twitter tells me things there are little ideas I should say not all of his character but little ideas amra tweeted checkpoints on the streets of her house is this the Great America we point billboards at Raids and police state type checkpoints don't feel like the land of the free, they were built by immigrant ancestors, so she got that tweet right, but then it was her next tweet, someone you know took a screenshot and posted , we noticed that you deleted the racist tweet that preceded this one.

The Internet saved a copy for you here Amber tweeted I just heard there is an ice checkpoint in Hollywood a few blocks from where I live. Everyone better take their housekeepers, nannies, and landscapers home tonight. I'm going to be angry, I don't think so. I need to point out how racist the implication is and when I saw your response to this where someone said, "This was racist," your response was to post a photo of a child, a minority child in this country, and use this child to post the following with this human rights crisis so politicized that it is difficult to make a simple statement without it being used to distract from the real problems.

It's hard for everyone not to be negatively affected by this issue in some way. I don't accept, they can't you're always right you should try to be wrong at some point because you might learn something this is what it means to enlighten the public you said something positive you said something that is inherently racist that implies that the marginalized communities that are immigrants are just babysitters and housewives and the like landscapers, the slaves, the servants of you and then the people of Gaslight, by acting as if people are upset by your racist statements, they are somehow simply distracting themselves from the real problems, the problems real are the privilege that allows you to make tweets. like this and then pretend it never happened, the problems are the inhumane treatment of people of different colors, that is, reducing them to a small specific subset of jobs that have been used as a weapon against marginalized communities since the dawn of time and people who act like that's all they do and to call it just a simple statement, it's a simple statement for you because it didn't affect them, it's not a simple statement for everyone else, all the marginalized communities that have to see these kinds of books constantly. spit on and then defended and again I tell these things when I see how you are in nature, in nature, in life, when I see a trace of behaviors in someone and then I see her take the stand and when she is faced with things that are like, wow, that was something you actually did or said when she confronted, hey, you're lying about the promise and she doubles down or turns on in a way.

I take all of these things as an account of someone's character. this is from ray donda Amber's lawyer said they are filing an appeal thinking about what that will look like. Does your client want to appeal? Oh, absolutely and she has excellent foundations for it. I don't know if that will finally happen. Appeals can take a very long time and can be very expensive. I don't think Amber has the money. Will she be able to pay a $10.4 million judgment? Oh no, absolutely not. She now she will have a benefactor. Will Elon Musk step in and pay the bills?

I know we'll have to see, but I wasn't surprised that that was the immediate statement that they would post a question from Michelle, what do you think of the people saying this is the beginning of the end for me too? or how believing that all women is being seen as a toxic or dangerous idea that perpetuates the idea that it is harder for men to be victims. I think the hashtag "believe all women are" excludes other victims who are not women. I think it started with good intentions overall, but I think it can spiral into a spiral that erases the fact that there are other victims in the world, how is she doing today, what's next for her?

She's right, well, her next step is to appeal. They were heartbroken. He's heartbroken and one of the first things he said when he came back from the verdict when we walked into the conference room was, I'm so sorry for all these women, and he said yes, he felt like he let all these women down. because he had more evidence than most people and they still didn't believe him Elaine Charleston Brett Hall thank you very much for joining us, we appreciate you many people to this day continue not to recognize where the metoo movement really began Many people attribute it to uh, when Alyssa Milano posted her tweet about the me too conversation, the movement didn't start with Alyssa Milano, the movement didn't start with predominantly white actors in Hollywood and I think it's important that we do that.

I'm sure we understand the roots of all of these things right now, the movement was actually founded by Tarana Burke, a black woman whose central idea was that marginalized communities, especially black and brown girls and women, are not taken Seriously, uh, when they are. sharing about being victims of abuse and founded the metoo movement in 2006, this was much earlier, like 10 or so years before Allah's tweet Alyssa Milano, you know, I think it's important to keep these things in mind and I'll read just a little bit here About Activist Tarana Burke, founder of the Metoo movement, sees a stark contrast in the timeline of the scene of the Weinstein case and that of R B singer R Kelly, who dodged accusations for more than 25 years.

She remembers that when the allegations about Weinstein emerged, they came very quickly. Justice in that sense R Kelly took 25 years Kelly's victims were primarily, if not entirely, black and brown girls, as Tarana Burke says, we are socialized to respond to the vulnerability of white women and it is a truth that a Some people find it hard to see in the face and feel uncomfortable when I say things like that, but it's true that there is a big difference in what it takes to get attention between black women and girls. This is not a debate. This is a fact.

This is something that happens in our society. When you know Alyssa Milano's tweet, I'm not saying there was anything wrong with her tweet, I think it was a great thing that happened and encouraged a lot of people to start telling their stories, but it did, it kind of erased the original narrative that was going to put emphasis and resources and focus on marginalized communities of victims and instead the movement was taken up predominantly by white women in Hollywood again. I'm not saying their stories should be invalidated, of course, not every story deserves to be told and heard, but at the same time this was the central root of the me too movement that I think we've lost sight of to some extent.

Here's a question from Kylo that says: Do you think the ACLU will speak out and potentially sideline Amber Heard for potentially lying about DV right now. I don't think the ACLU will sideline Amber. We know that the ACLU has already filed a request and they are demanding that Johnny pay them 86,000 in fees. that they are charging for the time spent gathering documents that you all gathered like two pages of documents. I don't know where they get eighty-six thousand dollars from, but to me, because they're going after Johnny for it, I think they're just going. To double down on her position, here's a question from her, Roy.

I apologize if I mispronounce that if Amber's team had done something different, do you think it's possible that she would have convinced the jury enough to possibly have the jury nod or something different? There's always the possibility that they should have done differently is that Amber should have been honest but again she still has to combat these recordings that were in evidence which are very difficult. I think coming back from DJ Saul she says do you think this case could be established? a precedent for male victims everywhere. I think it can be if we continue to share a correct and healthy narrative and that is as simple as simply identifying and recognizing that male victims exist if someone is a victim, they are a victim, no matter who they are.

If they are victims, they are victims. I just hope that by constructing that fact and that narrative we don't inherently destroy the female victims who also exist. Question from Beau, why do you think the media seems to be paying attention? Amber Heard says an injustice has occurred. Some of the people whoThey write they are survivors who identified with Amber, so that's their opinion. I think other outlets that have written in support of Amber are the same outlets that were very blatantly criticizing Johnny when these allegations first came out in 2016 with the tro, so now they would support Johnny and the way the jury found this case would mean that they would essentially have to retract their previous statements and we don't see many people we don't see many media outlets willing to admit if they were potentially wrong about something.

Here's one of us supporting Johnny Depp saying: "We look forward to your video, thank you. I always appreciate it. What are you planning on next?" I will post the second part of the Sienna May Jack Wright situation below. Many of you are asking, so part two is coming. I'm making a lot of things happen behind the scenes, thanks for joining me. As we covered this test because I thought it was incredibly important to cover and hopefully dispel some of the misinformation, so I'm trying to add a little balance to it. Great, well it's time for a cat palette cleanser.

Now this. big girl here, so this is a Dora bill from the billing department, but now I call her a moose, okay, she's a moose, you want to look, you want to wave, here we go, you want to show your belly? Bailey Bailey Billy Billy Billy Billy Billy Billy Billy, I love your moose belly, she is a very sweet girl and she is so much fun. She plays fetch for me every day, several times a day, when I'm at my desk and working, I hear this little mouse blob. and she gives me these little moose bumps on my leg and that lets me know it's time to play fetch and it's the cutest thing.

I grab the mouse and she likes to get a little bit of a head start and then I just throw it away. across the room and she gives it back to me every time it starts off good good girl moose moose seriously it's the sweetest thing say bye please tag me on insta city and it makes me so happy to see your outfits and I will. Reposting a couple of shout outs on Twitter to my latest doc where I dug deep and analyzed the most damning evidence from this trial that did and did not make it to trial.

If you haven't seen it, it's linked below. First, mention. going to trivia I love BTS who said I said it the day you posted you were making this video but I'll say it again this is what we need more people with critical thinking and who are willing to see things from different perspectives and objectively. I'm so glad you're covering this, thank you very much. I hope this series has been helpful. The second thank you is for fools who say that when talking about Swoop, not all victims have images that made me feel in the biggest scene I grew up in.

I suffered emotional mental abuse and was always afraid that no one would believe me because I didn't have physical evidence of my pain and injuries. Thank you for defending all the victims. First of all, you'll never have to thank me. Me too. I am truly sorry for what you have been through and hope you have found some healing. If you want to be my next Twitter post, be sure to follow me on Twitter at spankyv linked below and retweet this video right here and for good. make sure to check out this super fun game June's Journey and download it for free with my link in the description box below you will love this game solve those crimes and have fun honey I think it doesn't matter which side you are on I think We can all agree on two things: this trial was a disturbing look at the deep complexities of DB and the conversation around DV and Essay will never be the same.

On the one hand, people fear that this will make it harder to believe survivors, and on the other. the other people think this was a triumph for the survivors. I think the ultimate consequences will have to reveal themselves over time like anything, but it doesn't have to be negative. Will this test set back the survivors and the me too movement only if you want it to? I think it ultimately comes down to changing the conversation around victims and abusers about how we allow the hateful and misinformed narrative about survivors to have a place in our society versus open, well-informed advocacy and understanding that things like DB and Essay are incredibly complicated, remember there is no perfect victim there is no such thing as a perfect abuser there is no such thing as a perfect story there is only the truth and that can be hard to find there have been countless social stigmas around believing in victim since the dawn of time, like what were you wearing when they attacked you, if you were drinking you were flirting why didn't you let them why didn't you tell someone where the photos are not everything is what it seems sometimes victims don't have visible wounds sometimes they have proof sometimes they don't but the majority suffer in silence each story is different each story is valid but at the same time each story is exactly the same in the sense that they always involve an infuser who simply comes out of this test and beyond all this and gives it a more global perspective.

I think it's time to completely change the conversation around victims and survivors instead of constantly asking the victim what they could have done differently, we need to ask the abuser what they could have done differently, why don't we spend more time educating to people about the early signs of abusive behavior so that it can be addressed immediately and hopefully prevent abusers from becoming abusers and therefore saving victims who become survivors now, one thing is undeniably true, there are male victims, there are female victims, non-binary trans and there is any identity of victims, the truth is the truth and that is the truth if you are a survivor, no matter who you are, you deserve to be heard and I believe you and it is not your guilt the truth is the truth I know you're hurting I know things like this trial can be confusing or scary You may feel insecure or afraid to tell your story and I'm not going to promise you that it will be an easy thing to do, but I do promise you that the truth is the truth.

If you are a survivor, your story is valid no matter what. If you want to tell your story, okay, I'm cheering you on in the background, you've got this, and if you don't want to tell your story like it's not now or never, okay, I'm cheering you on in the background, you've got this. and with that all I'm going to say is that class is over.