Andrew Marr's political B.S. detector | LBC

I think I've just made up my own homemade nonsense or nonsense

detector

Every time a politician uses the phrase Brits be very careful if they use it over and over again they run in the opposite direction holding their nose in today's debate on the new laws against illegal immigration. the Home Secretary, Suella Bravaman, was very interested in telling us what the British people were like and what they wanted and that they were pulling the piss of the British people, while her counterpart Yvette Cooper was equally interested in telling us that Britain and therefore, guess the british people were better than ok sue she bravaman horse manure in general says the

detector

the proposed new law would force the government to arrest all asylum seekers who arrive in the uk illegally and hold them for 28 days without bail nor judicial review Until they can be expelled to a safer third country like Rwanda or wherever they come from, no illegal migrant will have the right to stay here as for legal migrants or refugees there will be a limit on the number of migrants which Britain accepts each year decided by Parliament.

There are one hundred million people around the world who could qualify for protection under our current laws. Let's be clear: they come here. Wow, 100 million are coming here. It has since been noted that, excluding Ukrainians, fewer than a million people applied for asylum worldwide. Europe last year, so that's quite a large number of the Home Secretary, while there are enormous practical difficulties, this will require new huge and completely secure detention camps and then there is the question of how to return people who flee to, for example, Afghanistan ruled by the Taliban. The war has devastated Syria, Yemen or Somalia, which are in the midst of civil wars, even if flights to Rwanda take off, only a modest number are needed, so the question remains: what is really done with those who return? to despotic or violent places?

From helicopters they forced them to cross the border with pitchforks. I don't know. I've spent quite a bit of time talking to conservatives, including some high-ranking ones, and the word that comes up over and over again when they discuss this bill is formative. It's a pretty dull word but it's actually very rude, it means they think Conservative ministers are doing this just for effect by dancing in front of voters and it won't work, it's not serious and that's pretty much what Yvette Cooper at his best. A serious voice said: That's enough! We cannot afford any more of these slogans and no Solutions only government by tricks increasing the rhetoric about refugees but picking fights simply to have someone else to blame when things go wrong.

This bill is not a solution, it is a scam that risks making the chaos worse. Britain deserves better than this chaos. Britain is better than this after Braverman went full throttle against the Labor party and leftist hypocrisy in general, which might be at least part of the point of it all This, firstly, she says get serious, well, let's look at the facts mr president, british urine canisters are one of the five promises the prime minister made to the british people, but stopping the canisters wasn't even on the top of the oppositions five big miss is because you probably don't care or is it because he doesn't care or because he doesn't know what to do we all know why and I think the British people know why it is now difficult to be sure how the politics of this is going to play out on the one hand the current situation 45,000 illegal immigrants in the channel last year is clearly unsustainable and Brotherman is right in a world devastated by climate change and war and dictatorship there are almost infinite places for new immigrants to arrive in the coming years, does Labour's policy of doing more to combat to gangs is really a big enough response?

If voters conclude no, then workers will pay a heavy price. On the other hand, this is not without risks for conservatives either. I have tried a law like this before and it failed. Now they are promising a lot again, if this doesn't work, if they build big new camps in Kent and then can't get people back to where they came from, the voters won't do it. Forgive them for what it's worth. I think a much more significant measure would be a new agreement with the French to close their coast to people. Smugglers now. Rishi Sunak is taking key members of his cabinet to France to meet President Macron and his team on Friday.

And that's where you'd expect the real deal. What would Macron want in return? I wonder because it would certainly be something maybe a new agreement on fishing rights because President Macron is having a lot of problems with the coastal communities in Normandy and Brittany. Anyway, what's going on in France? on Friday will be much more important, I think, than today's overwrought scenes in Westminster.