YTread Logo
YTread Logo

Jan Böhmermann bei "Spitzentitel" über Twitter, Satire und Cancel Culture. | DER SPIEGEL

May 04, 2024
Welcome to the top titles of the book exhibition on

spiegel

.de My name is Volker Weidermann Your name is Jan Bö

hmermann

Welcome Thank you very much for the invitation Hello good morning Also today on the program Elke Heidenreich The best titles of the week and the most next week's sellers But first for you 2.2 million followers the book jumped from zero to one on the bestseller list but at the beginning 45 short questions to get to know each other for the lost 3 you haven't lost yet your favorite lost who follow me yes First of all, I am successful and then your wish comes true.
jan b hmermann bei spitzentitel ber twitter satire und cancel culture der spiegel
You also can't give an overview of my followers in reality and I with you, who I follow, mirror the mirror online, always good news and always updated and mostly journalists, stop, start well. With which follower would you most like to have a barbecue with the people I follow or the people who follow me where we are for new ideas? I'd probably like to have a barbecue with Heiko Maas somewhere on the boat together with some BKA musclemen. bodyguard on the way to an important mission and they both have big sunglasses on and so on Gas grill on the speedboat in the front and always a photographer who has to walk around and take photos videos for Instagram and not because he's so skinny a little I hope account follow, he is part of the most embarrassing American band, never a Spiegel account, so Dennis Spiegel, but The mirror tweets Donald Trump at some point and therefore I couldn't take it anymore and there is 1 experimental account that always offers the tweets of Donald Trump himself to find out if Twitter blocks this account instead of that of the American president as a kind of control.
jan b hmermann bei spitzentitel ber twitter satire und cancel culture der spiegel

More Interesting Facts About,

jan b hmermann bei spitzentitel ber twitter satire und cancel culture der spiegel...

And yes, that's right Maria, I think that's impossible. Donald Trump's content is basically thought out of the box but still in it. timeline and gets angry every time. The best thing about Bremen is Vegesack Pflege Bremen makes the storm pronounced, it is called vegesack bei and the best thing is the proximity to the water and the very simple and friendly people, of which I am the worst for a long time. in cologne there is nothing wrong in cologne it is the reserved bremen veh said it's just that the infrastructure is getting bigger It's great that local politics has been well established for many decades and you have the feeling of being in a real city, not in a project as big as in Berlin and now, I know, there were bad people who all say that they are in a relationship today and that they are cured, of course, and this has now been published to read this, I have specially marked it here in color. to prove it to you, I read it very well, yes, you left aside this year 2017, they have just revealed it to me, now they want the preliminary discussion of the secrets.
jan b hmermann bei spitzentitel ber twitter satire und cancel culture der spiegel
Here it is not only open in conversation that you can bring the conversations that I just revealed. You're on the elevator to the state conversation, yes, that's what you read. It makes having the book at your side very nice. In reality, it is not just a political newspaper. You should be able to feel so incredibly excited as the years go by. or slowly the rise of emotion, for example, you can read about it here, but a little so that people who may not know you from Twitter or like you, things only really take on reality and importance when they are tied to we. you can do something for them now, but let's be honest, that's true, but that's the assumption.
jan b hmermann bei spitzentitel ber twitter satire und cancel culture der spiegel
That's right, Wartenberg, one of the reasons I did this and convinced the editor to do it for years is that I believe things only become real. when they are tactile, when they are in your hand and only then do you start to think about them seriously. Then you can get to work because the idea of ​​doing this is not just me expressing myself on the Internet and now I want to believe that. This is in some ways great literature, but rather the realization that I've been blowing it somewhere for years and it's just disappeared and everything swam away and I always started to move away from it, I think in order to do that.
Properly evaluating what is really happening to me is, of course, very subjective, but also what has happened to the world around me has to be put into a tangible form and I think so. I think it's a joke, but it's not. It's a joke at all, but of course it's a little subjective because I live mostly in books, but it's incredibly important to me and there's actually something to it as a book. Because of the type of society you think of at the beginning, you explain it a little completely. -full at first, but both important public actors in all major social states appear in their public roles and sometimes also in the not so intentionally open ones.
I read a little in advance. I'm skipping some, but to move a little that might be quite nice begins in the year 2015 March twenty-third, 2015 I read the dates are always the sentences the only thing

satire

is not allowed to storm the editorial offices armed with Kalashnikovs and shooting innocent people March 18 Katarina Witt is still somehow an advertising ambassador for the GDR March 31 You can write the most stupid things as long as the sentence ends with a question mark April 1 God forbid that someone ends up hurt or even shot by the Bundeswehr's faulty G36 rifle. Maybe some of them are really funny.
Did you actually sniff anything afterwards? Didn't I cheat? I removed some of the spelling mistakes that were really like that in Japan and then wrote something about the idea being really bad. That goes to big management consultancies. I just forgot a word and then it didn't make any sense anymore, things like that but already corrected, she didn't tweet anything after, sorry, nothing after tweeting in the book, so to speak. , that in a new one so they take it out in not only things that it is not there is nothing in it that was not really there The things that are there are sometimes in the electro said that you can't do everything just the language but a little of demand we are Kiepenheuer & Witsch we are the publisher but there is a little effort as a television presenter you are exposed to this inhuman lobby every day without protection on April 2, 2015 That's how it is now I It is that we will say very briefly that I am not in Dust, Mr.
Next, one is required because I look really old and that works, but that didn't happen. It was when the new debate material appeared on the Internet in 2015. Lukas Moos came up, then the criticism arose that people are judged by their appearance and that's not so good. Their lobbying is really something new. Lukas must be something new, so the Internet is not bad. You have to get it first. Come April 2, when you can no longer judge people by their external office or by what they say, then precisely that is why you can't speak louder on Twitter or yes, it's you, that's the medium that forces you to change the language that you have over the years.
Twitter's own language has also been developed around loudness or, for example, omitting punctuation marks to show that it is actually taken off the wrist, so it is shaken off the wrist even more than Twitter is usually taken off the wrist. of the wrist, so linguistically it is also totally interesting. And I don't want to sound like a nerd, but at the beginning it was about Charlie Hebdo and I didn't get out of the book. I found out about that, but shortly after this tweet appeared where. suddenly they became so pathetic and honest, let's say now let's all stick together, it means I think I said it was after the water is clear.
I am finishing my short reading on April 25th. I can't hear the packaged word

satire

anymore, please. stop using it all the time April 25, 2015 a call that still applies today and they didn't even introduce the word satire into the debate No, of course not, of course it's not just if you're really good. baking sourdough bread and that has been perfected in the Kronen era, so at some point you will consider yourself a Becker, but that is not the case. Ask the good Beckers, the ones with professional honor, that's not the case. , not everyone who makes a sourdough approach is a baker even if it looks great on Instagram Becker are Becker they do it as a job and exactly and who decides in the bakery customers ranking second customers of course customers customers by Of course I still have to return to nature and the moments were or are Jan Willmann in quotes on Twitter mostly but as a fictional character or not but sometimes brother the concept is a fictional character that is over that cannot be maintained that everything is There is no fictitious character in there, but always just that.
Some statements stand on stage and play something, but at least I think that deep down you have to think that the person who is on stage and plays in this case is the Twitter account is always you and the one who writes the piece You are an actor of yourself but not a fictional character, work and fictional character, it implies that you are completely artificial, so you are next to yourself, separated from yourself and that is not the case and that is an excuse just as bad, the satire that you say behind everything, behind every insult and behind every stab against someone who doesn't like you, that is a satire that is extreme and the character of Fiction just like

cancel

ed has to be buried, that's right. nonsense that's really enough it has become more accurate

cancel

screen

culture

has to be buried what does that word mean should it be buried or not receptivity had this concept of ending this debate canceled Scharner so that almost unpopular debates remain discredited but the headline is the same as saying also tweet from two days ago whoever does not applaud stupid opinions commits murder-opinion in the same way or or taking the word program out of the box because people do not think the content I present on stage as a The cabaret artist is great.
You don't have to tell someone who is so vulnerable or so sensitive when we buy their own art. You don't have to ban it on stage, but you have to say it very clearly, come down. a little bit and relax, it was at the end, it's just comedy and I like to have a show, this last statement from Dieter Nuhr or as I think the cup sister is called, I don't want to say anything bad, but how? Has it happened in general that these incredibly drastic words are now constantly repeated and is Twitter to blame for this?
And if you are not guilty, you are, so to speak, part of this growing number of people who are speaking louder and louder, you are also sensible. like Navid Kermani now they talk about civil war, they say that citizens fight only because people do not want to appear with others. How did that happen? They are talking about civil war when people don't want to show up with others. So I come from public broadcasting and I know I still started with radio Bremen and that's a very classic celebrity league director who you better say the most important thing to in the morning and if you've ever said something profound then you say. on the Internet in the office and you have been fired and if you are unlucky, you have been canceled 20 years ago and that will continue to be the case and you always have to be clear when you go on stage that what you want to say is never the complete truth and I don't think that you can be so strict with yourself and think it is.
You are the one who has greatness for you, it's just that it is always constantly changing and you fail regularly and We are always fallible and terrible yes yes yes now turn around if somehow such authoritarian art suddenly happens to the artist in the stand on stage and think that everything I say here will be applauded, otherwise you will have a problem down there and it is not valid and that is not possible, that is return of weight, you cannot demand an improvement in the political

culture

and ignore regression because you always have to give in to all that, it doesn't always move forward, it goes backwards, we have experienced it. that or here in the book while I read the book I have the impression that there is absolutely nothing before there is the tone after Erdogan's poem after the moment of the state affair that they really triggered and after that they also get irritated, I have the impression or becomes more sensitive, of course, also because of what they have experienced or what has happened to them, that they have also lived it in such a way that something has happened to them.
But I changed it, but I also said, yeah, exactly. , and the interesting thing about this material is that it is not just a diary that you write for yourself, but it always has an immediate effect and if that Forum in which the effect is increasingly greater it also comes with components that of course make you aware of your responsibilities what you have there so you can I can no longer write like I wrote for the school newspaper 20 years ago or ten years ago when the book started and I started tweeting that doesn't work anymore so it's not the little boat anymore quick where you can throw some kind of insult and that's you, but today it's difficult because it just has a huge forum and if you experience this growth and this new responsibility in advertising and you don't come to the mirror and know that now you're with the big one and suddenly You have a huge responsibility and forum, but when it grows with you, sometimes it is not so easy to distinguish what is a personal impulse that a man can give and what falls apart.
In the area of ​​caution, journalistic responsibility and, as is often seen, that ends very often badly in Buchholz, that still happens to me regularly, so really because it is such an immediate medium and you forget about the forum, which you really have. I know that whenyou get, the collar pops in a place that is very loud and audible, and then at some point you have to say, "Okay, how do I deal with this? Then I have to enter the category of apology and I have to enter the category of withdrawal and and also of fallibility, which is no longer a concept that you have when you have such a thing that you say that everything that comes around a big head is incredibly big and that generally they are not strategies already planned in advance now Horst Seehofer as the current case, well, that's the 101 days and then how much later they deleted it again hours or something like that is really what happens when you are faced with political ignorance of such magnitude and it affects you personally and the environment when it is also linked to the biography that you are police officers If you encounter someone who looks at you in the eyes uncertainly and avoids your gaze because he knows that he is supposed to protect you, on the one hand, but on the other hand, he also knows that you think he is a criminal, that's what makes me very angry, it honestly makes me angry and it's easier for me when the personal component that you don't have to broadcast publicly now comes into play, it's easy then my necklace explodes and it doesn't happen as often, maybe a North German, but when there is also a capable Theresa Bahnhof and then you have to say yes, I'm sorry, but that's how it is, then you can, that's how it is, that's stupid and don't do that, but it's unforgivable, but you should still do it and you want to go too far.
We don't spread the personal component, but still, what was it like for you to find out that the police computer actually sent your address to the right? Wing extremists, so this crisis for this component should not be public. I predict myself solely because of ongoing investigations so I grew up in the police family in both the first half and I'm a big fan of the German police and you shouldn't comment on ongoing investigations we don't do that but we would have the same now comes Heidenreich with the top, you finally know them I still have your old records Patti Smith Roll idol of the 70s Then she interrupted her career for decades to raise her two children with her husband, guitarist Fred Sonic Smith.
Meanwhile, Yaman has died, the children have grown up, and now Ella Partie is acting and singing again. She is now 70 years old and doing well. If something. so, still beautiful, you may still be 70, you're getting over it a little, and she's writing books about her life in tight little scrapbooks. The first was about her time with photographer Robert Mapplethorpe in New York. , that is, she simply has children. Then she wrote about her life with her husband, the guitarist, in her formation 1 and now Kiepenheuer & Witsch has published a book in the year of the monkey, the year of the monkey according to the Chinese horoscope for In 2016, Patti Smith turned 70 and, As always, with small luggage, a backpack, dirty clothes, some books, thick hiking boots, he traveled throughout America and also flew to Europe. she thinks about loss in this book about old age.
She visits Sam Shepard, her friend, the deceased writer and actor, and helps him with her latest texts. Friendship is very important to her and she writes down what she sees along the way. and she thinks about what it is like now that she herself is suddenly getting older. She usually travels with people who somehow take her for a few dollars and she has a wonderful story about how she met a couple with a completely different relationship. car crazy about the trip to San Diego, an eight hour trip and they say we're taking you with us but you don't say a single word and she's sitting in this car now and they're playing wonderful music on the car radio with cassettes and somewhere moment I said it was good music and they immediately stopped in the middle of the road and left and said we said not to say a word so in this book strange things come up and she writes a lot of things that become old and then I would like to read you my small excerpt.
Nothing can stop time. Nothing can change the fact that in the year 78 170 I only have one number, but one that shows how the allocated sand flows through the stopwatch and into yourself. It is that it disappears because you yourself are the cursed one while the grains drip. I miss the dead more than before. I notice that I cry more often when I see love scenes on TV, a retired detective, the man in the back shooting. While looking at the sea or at a tired father who lives his son's life, I notice that only tears burn in my eyes, that I am no longer a fast runner and that my sense of time accelerates.
In reality, there is nothing better. Way to write about aging. She is a poetic dreamer but she is definitely connected to reality. She calls Donald Trump, I want to quote him exactly, an insufferable yellow-haired con man and his election is a terrible soap opera, but that's it. The realism of these quite dreamy texts. She says stupid things. The thing about dreams is that you simply have to wake up and discover that Patti Smith is definitely the real world, even if she always tries to get away from the news very quickly when she arrives. She appears on the radio, but at home she is simply in the world of music, poetry, friendship and her book is like a poultice of consolation on a wound that life hits us every day.
The texts are very poetic, very dreamlike, sometimes a little. enigmatic but never sentimental, never corny and she says my husband is dead, my mother is dead, my brother is dead, my cat is dead my dog ​​died in 1957 and is still dead and yet I keep hoping that something wonderful will happen maybe tomorrow, but hope cannot be that great because she begins her book with a quote from Antonin Artaud: a fatal madness comes into the world, this deadly madness I think has been there for a long time, but with books like these you can console. Patti Smith has also been writing books for a long time, of course, but once she sang, it would be a good question now if we can do it like that too.
Patrice can sing too, I can sing easily right away, but this camera The situation quickly overwhelms you with your enthusiasm and then you feel humiliated, so I don't want to do it now, so I can do the green camera, but we can come and we can. I really like to sing something, but I don't want to. so we can sing the national anthem, we can sing some Nu Pagadi or whatever you want, so briefly with two applause scenes, Rita H thought it was bad without it, I think it was great for the innocent, I don't care at all.
I didn't care at all, I didn't sing anymore, I didn't sing for hours. I really enjoy getting things out of the system. Now they took my questions out of the system. I would love to get to the word hunger. The word begins with that and why the book begins with hunger and why they started in 2009 exactly in 2009. I was just before 30, yes, I was just before 328 and I was just hungry and I had to with the middle in that so I generously tried to register on new social networks studivz was studivz and Twitter blogs or in the United States that was that and Barack Obama ran his campaign on that, read the study and looked at it, right?
I totally understood it at first and then I did it. I wrote what I was hungry for, there are worse first tweets, that is my first tweet and since then I opened the medium for the first few years and tried to find out how it really works and what is interesting is the medium. During these years he also tried to discover himself and even Twitter didn't know what he really was in the year 2000 and the early years of the book are actually his kind of foreplay before things start to get interesting from 2015 onwards and in which moment you will be able to understand it internally or I think you were crazy for the first time when Hubertus Heil suddenly slept with you or Peter Altmaier had the first years there are also many interesting conversations with people who were somehow already on schedule at that time or how Important were for the German society that tried it on Twitter with its funny and totally irrelevant nature, but of course it was interesting to discover how the medium works. works and the mechanisms of this medium so that you, as an absolute nobody, as a dubious comedy clown loaded with testosterone with the then, I believe that the Federal Minister of the Environment can start a conversation through this medium and, in Ultimately, too, if you want to say it in a very pathetic way, a little fulfillment of your democratic promise there is 2 I cut off my moral index finger since slightly injured is still the successor of The story with my insult to the previous 22 things which normally have nothing to do with each other every day in real dialogue, but it is also a small sector of democracy 95 percent I think I say it right, but if you are honest, pragmatic, no, Germany will not be administered for 80 million of people at the same time, but there are only a few.
Hopefully, and fortunately, they are always exchanged regularly if they fail or at some point you no longer feel like it, so everything is changing, but I think it's Guys, I think he once said that the Minister of State for Digital in the Federal Chancellery Twitter is for political journalists and other psychopaths and that is exactly what you can see with Dorothea, I immediately realize that you recognize your talents on Twitter immediately, so there was no European back then Secretary ac a d But that was completely clear o no Is it fun to argue in public discourse and do you also have to be able to say yes and have a talent for communication?
Of course, as in everything, it is about communication in which you do not have the most beautiful content and programmatically too far to be. in front if you can't communicate and it's stupid, but even if you can communicate well, little content because it's also stupid, then you meet in Dortmund and then the people who can communicate meet and then put together what they said before. Because? Is the debate so specific? Then I feed, lurking in the trenches, headlines about no man's land and in the heads of others and in the end I am informed that the resistance to the debate is that this is not the place where it can be done. finding consensus Of course, you will never be able to sit down and look each other in the eye and solve a problem via Twitter, but you know the points of view from which you approach each other and you have had plenty of time to do so.
Take advantage of the opportunity that the hunk now has, which in life outside of Twitter is sometimes more sensitive because unfortunately in blog.de life it is more difficult in my life, blocking is also very easy, so I will probably leave the Spiegel building . and below is on the other side, on the other side. Is it the Spree or the canal? And if people in the mirror don't want to see that Gros Beckstein Bad is coming down with his ship, close the blinds and see this media house in its entirety. is infamy and not passing, that is also blocking and that you distance yourself from people whose honesty you doubt, for example, or whose love for fair play or from whom you do not have to assume that, but who you really ask yourself is that is what we would now like to refer back to on Twitter, I really want to be confronted with every opinion that is real.
Every opinion is worth debating and I say no that's not the case and I don't go to the magazine store and They say they take all magazines equally seriously and that's how you have to treat the Internet so you have to be your own editor and sometimes I go on the Internet And I have the feeling that there are their magazines on a newsstand with a baseball bat. , forcing me as a client to read everything you just did in an interview with WeirgangJohanna Gaal said in SZ that they are also sometimes afraid of 2.2 million followers because the uncontrolled power of opinion we actually reflect the face of the newspapers everyone has editorial chief editors or at least colleagues see texts that say they can have theirs too first it's crazy that it's even possible secondly it can't really stay that way yes you were serious and yes for Of course, how can it be changed?
So I think it needs to be that way in the first place because that's the reality, well, that's true. It happened and we are dealing with the effects of this media development. You can't turn this off for all the people who have the power of opinion on their cell phones alone, but you have to deal with this problem and to do it you first have to recognize it. It is a problem and the solution, as is often the case, is not so easy to produce. As with all big problems, there has to be a middle ground that also includes social networks and their responsibilities. period, when you type sex in Google when you were ten years old, you get pornography and, on the other hand, in every bar there is the youth protection law printed on an aluminum thing and the regulatory office behind which the failure of the companies really always depends. institutions When it comes to fulfilling their tasks in the digital space there is also a problem and it must also be taken into account that this may have a legal dimension, for example the extension of the press law to these accounts, how is this handled? ?
If that can be done, the press can be held legally responsible, that is what case law has shown. The judicial power has to act again, so that later, in any case, there are no precedents, of course, later, that is. censorship, and it is still not carried out The challenge is and and the idea and the and the basic idea I think you have to get used to it is theActually, that's how it is and the direction of travel is the Internet. to go to reality and reality has to go to the Internet so you can do it smarter.
It's not honest, none of them are super smart, but that's more him, but also a question of course, what does that look like and was he asked specifically? They have this power and, for example, to act against opponents or to perform verbal actions with a tourist. The opponent now uses it from his sun. This civil war respondent actually uses it or not, but of course, they are the opponents in the dispute. opinion, then you can say yes, if you then shorten it to the opponents, then you quickly return to the program, well, of course, at first it is just a public debate, sometimes completely, but the opponent is in no way part of the program, but or there you have what you're doing about about about about about about the game is maybe but that occurred to me when I read the book again the fronts are us yeah that's that now has It's a big word fronts but it's actually pretty clear who it's which side exactly and who reacts in which way and how and then you automatically get to the word exactly and I think to figure that out you have to think about it so you're speaking on behalf of my industry as a dubious job to bring completely, to solve it you have to let chance and weakness happen, you have to let there be nuances and if you don't allow that, even while looking at your opponents, at least you have to open the flank yourself, we say people.
I think we should solve this problem the other way around and not in confrontation and you also said that people should not be so sensitive if they are not allowed to appear, for example, recently we had the case that an interview with the fas did not appear. And then she was also very offended because I wasn't. I just asked myself why and got no answer and discovered that, especially in the context of the debate about the culture of key figures that had been going on for months. It was very exciting that, in a good way, Merkel did not fall into this category.
It fits when she says editor, I don't want to, possibly without going against the will of the editors. Maybe later I heard something about it from him. I also said something bad about Hegel or Hegel's points that come later were a lever from the beginning. It's just that unfortunately it's a process, so she recognizes it, but even in writing it's an extremely unusual process. I can not remember it. It happened to me once in the last 20 years and I'm really there. I have the barricades set up and set on fire when my superior or journalistic superior said that you take it out of the broadcast without giving me the reasons. an extremely unusual process in newspapers of such importance and weight.
There are texts and they are read. There is a responsible editor and then Can this be the incident that Matt Kenseth once celebrated in Bavaria, but a large and patient newspaper like? The FAZ really has nothing to lose, which prints all anti-human opinions, no matter how absurd, under foreign pens if necessary. So that's what I do, it seems completely dubious to me from a journalistic point of view, but on the other hand. It's pretty funny too, it wasn't even a great interview, it's nothing, it didn't go that far, so I'm sure it wasn't the interview, but just so we have the material clicking, I have the photos that I would take.
I would like to see I also wonder if I would also like to see something that is not spectacular. I'm always a private flame and potted plant stuck in Kiwi. I have myself there too. I know you take your time and I would also be upset if This didn't air in full today in all its sass. You wouldn't want to shine with a Band-Aid on your finger. You have to show that if you do that, then you do that and where you shouldn't. some people find it extraordinary and of course I was amused by the fact that it was relatively widely read and received, I'd like to say that in the list, but also a little bit lastly, it's the parody of the canceled The Bigger They Get the jammers, to be able to interview one of these with a face interview cut out, you could start a solid cabaret career in Germany based on that, that's what's on every poster, the man who once had his face interview canceled and really I have things for the next 30 years in the citizen houses of the republic with a lot of fun and now we bring you first of all they did not invent Twitter I don't really know the values ​​they actually invented it from it she is the boss, so to speak, It would be the Mark Zuckerberg of Twitter, in reality it is a progressive Silicon Valley that it already is.
But he can't see the problems from his own skin and, of course, the company is public and money has to be invested. and then he is also a very interesting figure because, contrary to what he once said, he really claims to be more intellectual and he is the one who sees the problems. And he is also self-critical of his network, which now regulates the US president, which is really no, that takes a lot of courage and requires the willingness to confront something that is really exciting and exciting, and we are still taking a few steps back towards the predecessors of Twitter literary culture and we take a quiz.
I already have a little bit on my puny Twitter account, I threatened Anke a little bit and it's about, among other things, Georg Christoph Lichtenberg and his sude books and some others and there are ten tweets, ten possibilities and you say who's good and if you guess more than five there is also something to win if you guess more than five correctly they are there they are then you get them then start in my book collection my library you can choose three books with at least 5 less than 52 with one I I have to correctly classify them which was a fantastic, fantastic idea.
I'm glad you really brought people not only from your department but also from my department. I'm excited almost 50 50 I don't know exactly what the departments are in. the broader sense of our two departments I come from Homann you know this hand well no, for the love of God, I quoted it you just don't have it here in the book that has that I quoted it I know it but without It would be and who It is difficult for us to claim auxiliary copyright, who does Google give money for the phrase? We have to keep track of things.
By the way, I realized you're quoting Handke without even writing that. It is drawn by hand. On the other hand, hordes of literary scholars have to filter anything that comes out and lawyers, that occurs to me, but there is an incredibly intensive footnote apparatus that has nothing to do with that, but that was the reason for the main tasks There were two major tasks that they did, what they believe what they believe that at some point we existed there they are there with them they are from the literary industry then there are people who make the association because that is what the editor gave me not only at the end but how do you get to know that dot hill because I have to do everything for the money that the publisher gave me and when it comes to saying that there are works that obviously do that for once, I have to talk to my editor because that in itself but It hasn't worked yet today either, but I write to myself without footnotes.
He doesn't know exactly, but now there comes a time, of course, that's what it meant. write to me without footnotes, what was now bad for you or let your guests Sitting here, shiny with sweat, months alone, we get there, we do what I think they just read before OK and here the viewers see who and what our hairstyles we have and they read aloud and say who it is, look closer first in peace yes, he was here, they are the books of the ancients, so to speak, they are his, I repeat briefly, it is Elías Canetti and he who wrote the blinding em cioran for the disadvantage of being born is already good the title your friend Peter Handke as I said in them quotes and Nietzsche complains Then suddenly it became so dark as if the world was offended I would write in Canetti badly not well I tried, no I took more oh okay, who is this?
Because it was handball again, it was good. Yeah, I've never heard the term hand puppet outside of the Nazi theater or puppet industry. I never came across the term hand. The puppet Sascha Stanicic Suppan is clearly faithful to his area Of course, we have to recognize that everything is perfect stone floor opened and closed his drawers opened and closed lace tweet now that is the task of sexual activity I would say that I am very. happy who disappears disappears nobody nobody said anything Sibylle Berg really Sibylle works in what ways I know but everyone I know all the bathrooms are from Sibylle Berg's circle of friends, I don't know, I didn't know who Sibylle Berg was' It's not open and I that goes from morning to night, I'm alone, clearly Erika Steinbach and Cioran, the real French philosopher born in Romania, oh, I didn't even count a real book until now, until now a real book of five churches. so more than half more than 5 vs 3 and these are really great books so I'm completely out of place but like a peerage completely out of place but like a peerage completely out of place but like Sascha Lobo ne na .de llona you already have it here he has my first tweet she wrote well here in the first one and 2000 likes I'm from him I haven't even discovered it yet each language has its own silence lichtenberg canetti oh dear, now it's going to happen thin layers in the 1 but it's also easier if what you're looking for you'd have to be surprised ten times you're looking for trailers and then now I take Nietzsche's super point 2 don't take it back, but I intervened quickly Ah yes, the rent seems to me, while the only ones goods were trust, but rather to the mushrooms, the mushrooms, the mushrooms in Spessart separated them magnificent, the optical star is, of course, I want to fly here Erika Steinbach, should, yes, I had already gone, yes, I will.
I'm just saying I can still do all five. That's right, now I just have to assign the lichtenberg and the logo correctly and I can get the scripts, but there is the lobau or if so, the Osnabrück people are pretty good nowadays, but they also need to. three days to put on a wind pants which of course lichtenberg top number of the great Ober-ramstädter physicists five books 55 correct three books no no the joke is on the last one that is not so easy unfortunately actually it could be from the logo that now we are in the tweet now it is a tweet so to speak it is from the logo or not so read it and it is not so easy it is from it could be from the logo could be the twelve most important characteristics of people who believe that you can really say everything with stupid lists there is a very classic logo of course crazyCongratulations on your promotion, great gossip, little can, a little, little, little nonsense, no one applauds up to this point, thank you very much, now the best sellers are coming, unfortunately not half, nor the non-fiction. books, half of them are literature, but they are also good bestsellers, the best are the main titles, all of them and that is the best thing that can happen to a video game that becomes a book philipp geisler it is called standard skill like the youtuber and his adventure book Battle Royale have entered the tenth place and I am also sorry to say that they are fully fed, they are still alone at home.
Jan Weiler comforts you and this week in ninth place we parents stir the stories of Bernhard Schlink slowly. from the top 10 her book about leaving in many variations farewell colors eighth place in the week napoli low but only from fourth to seventh the enigmatic Elena relatives and her new novel the lying life of adults loneliness nature a little about you and the Beauty of the Outside World has been counting on the aliens in it for many months. The Crayfish Song is in sixth place and is now in the top ten and on the shortlist for the German Book Prize, some say it is the favorite.
Thomas Hettche tells the story of the Federal Republic as the story of Augsburger Puppenkiste is not yet the newcomer of the week, but it is already a small rocket heart that rises from 19th place to 5th for a long time in first place now in the fourth place the death of gustav mahler as a small novel the last sentence of robert seethaler who spoke here in the program about his own wish for an early death his work is called seeing god on stage read like a book that rose from eighth place to third and the man with the hit of the Austrians says from the clinic at the top of the best list and now in second place hamster in the Hinteren Strom area of ​​Joachim Meyerhoff down from 1, which means we have a new favorite What could that be, but no one is missing but rather a subscriber in first place who once wrote the pillars of the earth this book is now its prequel kingsbridge the morning of a new time ken follett from zero to one and we are back here sits the man on the other side of the bestseller list jan bö

hmermann

followed by nobody who you follow is the name of the book and next week in second place deep fall of 12 how could this happen this damn triumph is ruining everything for me oh it's triumph in which clarita is everything in 1 and I slipped to two but I think it can still be hot today get dressed it's cold again I looked at my watch the whole time because I was just told that while we were taking a short break it's time to get up I believe everythingthe time that everything is possible, whether because of the risk of thrombosis or because the show is slow is coming to an end or this is a political call to fight and postpone because you can't get out of bed, it doesn't mean because you always have to take responsibility for your class 6.
What do I know what you're talking about here? It gives you time to get up, that's how we are in the stranglehold of algorithms, what does that mean? Now it's a secret message from Steve Jobs. what's crazy is that they follow me because it's incredible steve jobs now here they don't follow what we're doing he's still blocked me eight he'll have blocked them forever that's true Terrible dead people, as always, I'll only be in the discussion about the title of the book Frank Schirrmacher blocked you because in the end we were followed by someone who people were looking for and that's why Jürgen Kaube also didn't publish an interview about them, so to speak, on Schirrmacher's sustainable blog, if I understand correctly. , the power constellation at the FAZ should not be interested in a cable at all and who might even have more reasons to print the interview if it had been said that it is okay for that, how does that qualify?
I am grateful to have read that I am in the air, just standing, where are the deleted tweets, actually all of them. So, so to speak, directly the Twitter tweets were removed from the book, but we are not all in it, now we are the ones removed. the ones I have to create the book Two years ago I started saving the database in which these tweets are saved, so by physically saving them on my computer, they have not been lost just because, because really that is a third of the material, but a lot. of the third was Janne, two thirds of those available now are promotional tweets, so there really are things that are about who is watching Sandy's TV shows today or something, now it's really not interesting for the task of this book and things have been deleted, but they are not completely lost, but unfortunately it is no longer useful, for example, to reconstruct the conversations that took place because I have all the tweets that are here, I searched for them manually on the Internet, so I went to look for them and then I did it. no fun and it took the same amount of time So it's already two years actually so no fun January 2000 I don't know if I'm already asking Germany to print mine now not as a fictional character so I'd like to have an idea other than So, of course, you can say that the trivial doesn't interest me.
But it's not that trivial, it's not even technically that trivial to produce it to meet the project requirements. It was important to see if the tweets are still there. , see who responded to them and am I really making this interesting rap? The deepening is much more than the tweets, what a company tweets sometimes happened years after the tweets, like me, for example, when Joachim Herrmann, the Bavarian Interior Minister. , told Frank Plasberg about Roberto Blanco that it was a wonderful n-word at the time and also the spelled n-word when he basically still didn't understand this reproductive idea that you continue to do harm by producing it regardless of the context.
I tweeted it back then and then three four five years later it showed up in this tweet where the Android announced in 2015 suddenly had tweets from 2017 2018 where people from the future were complaining about content from the past and wanted to get in there. It's totally exciting to see what happens next, the language has changed or the attitudes towards language, so all this debate after Pippi Longstocking continues to malek to take her out of there as the king of the end stop and make him the king of the Seas of the South and then also see. in digital industries and really cool to be able to see where it's coming from.
It's exciting that we have it, but now we have limited it, that is the future update, because everyone can write it for themselves, but you see that I don't have time for a promotional blog or just a blog of interest next time. The program is in the ZDF main program, as it is called. First of all, I would like to know something that is happening, what if it will happen? I am also very interested to know if it is not exactly at the time that the literary quartet is actually broadcasting and if the ZDF is now broadcasting it at two or half an hour, so instead, I want, I have received two. orders from my local station ZDF, with whom I have a good relationship, not always conflict-free but fruitful for almost ten years.
I have two orders. The first order is that we need a new and strong one. The wing voice in the media and I have said Gerhard Löwenthal there is no longer such a person, they are firmly pushing anti-communism in front lessons in the program, that is the statement due to the ZDF magazine as a basis, so the old vote show and then royal behind that which happens with a wink, that is the first order that I did not fulfill and the second order was that you will only get a broadcast slot if you prove in the classical cultural industry that you did not mean anything bad and that is when I wrote the bestseller for now first on the bestseller list so I can at least say where they are displacing the literary quartet, but you yourself just describe the books yourself, I don't know if I'm really displacing the literary quartet, but.
I rather see the program as a warm-up. Today's program is a classic comedy and the claim goes further, but of course it does not live up to it, but the red of the entire Friday night on ZDF is under the motto. entertainment is when it is exciting and that is true. Yes, based on Marcel Reich Ranicki also for his show, it is not a mix of educational ideas and entertainment, otherwise it will be nothing Warmup, I dare say, can we still use it on its infrasound frequency? because I'm not there anymore, but my colleagues can take advantage of the values ​​of a Java system, they can be there and are surprised when I still talk to myself as part of luck, everything is on the wall again or the diagrams no longer like that if he is really they are completely out now board yes yes I am here now I can't be everywhere thank you so much for coming thank you for the finished book thank you for the invitation and good luck for the show, Wave your hand and thank you so much for watching.
See you next Thursday in the top title with Wladimir Kaminer and Sora del Bono. Take care of yourself until Thursday and a headscarf, but to be honest, I'm really afraid of what I have. I'm about to part, but you can grab it spontaneously, of course, that's Hitler Goebbels. Heinrich Böll Hitler Goebbels. I know some giants who are very young and to me they are also confusing. Still, my bookshelf still has color, so Instagram furniture is jana. schmidt for old age I have drugs I don't know he doesn't have all the signs in one in a single volume a bit of a silent killer like Hegel and Goethe what was said is over nothing new has been published for a long time a real password was said, but It's a good thing that canceled literary cultures told me to give it to me very briefly, so honestly, why do I want to take a quick, fun look back because I don't have them.
I recently read a great book about the Berghof on Obersalzberg Circle. about the internal power structure surrounding Hitler and how people supported him despite his difficult personality and who benefited from it but such a fat, serious, younger, well for God's sake man, the storms of steel discussed as if they had gone crazy, but now let's take things straight. of 1 1 and 2 but you have won two but you have the Lord and you perceive what I would say serious serious younger and Oskar Schmidt hashish Claudia Claudia Kleinert in the harsh climate said at an award ceremony because he was from Kindernothilfe, the Kindernothilfe would have a wide range of courage and hope and that's exactly what I would say now, the wide range of courage and hope soared and in a storm of steel a lot of fun.

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact