Outrageous excess deaths

A very warm welcome to this talk on Thursday, April 18. We are now going to hear Mr Andrew Brid's presentation to an almost empty House of Commons Chamber and this is a really important speech that he makes here now at the end. from this speech you can hear the joy of the public gallery now there is a large sheet of glass blocking the public gallery of the members of parliament, a literally large sheet of glass blocking the two some might say there is a metaphor of the IAL glass sheet between the people and the members of parliament as well or the vast majority of members of parliament as well because in the end I couldn't believe it, the speaker threatened to clear the public gallery now if she had done that that would have just been the end of democracy in the UK if people can't see their own MPS in a pretty incredible debate, it's about

excess

deaths

, the causes, Andrew Bridgen on lack of science degrees in the House of Commons, a total shame for doctors to obey the guidelines and just do what they want.

We were told that this has been used as an excuse in the past in several other situations. Lack of good science. Australians have an inquiry into access

deaths

. It doesn't seem to bother us. The fourth part of the therapeutic module of public research has been. According to Mr Bridon, cancers could become more common due to SV40 DNA inclusions in vaccines. Genuine concerns. Gaset's data was ignored. They deliberately hid themselves with impunity. Record-level data is not available to the public or scientific researchers, but it appears to be available. For the pharmaceutical industry,

excess

deaths were 5% in 2023 and that is consistent with other countries where they are even higher even though the system has now changed, some might say that rigged DNRs do not revive orders that were abused of the ends of life. just a litany of dire things for Mr.

Orion now, in my opinion, here of the people, thank God, someone is speaking, now we come to the secondary motion on the response to the covid-19 pandemic and the trends in the excess deaths, uh, Andrew Bridin, moving forward, thank you. You, Madam Vice President, and I ask that you move the motion on my behalf on the order paper, we are witnesses to the biggest medical scandal in this country in living memory and possibly ever. The excess deaths in 2022 and 2023 is that scandal. Its causes are complex, but the novel and unproven medical treatment described as a Covid vaccine is a big part of the problem.

They have called me an anti-vaxer as if I reject these vaccines because of some ideology. I want to make it clear and unequivocal that I am not. double vaccination and vaccine harmed in intelligent people, we must be able to distinguish between people who are neither provac nor antiva but against a product that does not work and causes enormous harm to a percentage of the people who take it. I'm proud to be. one of the few members of parliament with a science degree, it is a great shame that there are not more members with a science background in this place, perhaps if there were there would be less reliance on briefings from the Whip's office, more independent research and perhaps less groupthink and I say to the House, and I say this in all seriousness, that this debate and others like it will be scrutinized by future generations and there will be a real Gog that the evidence has been ignored for so long and that genuine concerns were ignored and those who raised them were smeared and vilified and it does not take any scientific training to be horrified by officials deliberately withholding key facts in this scandal and that is exactly what is happening, Madam Vice President, that the office of national statistics used to publish weekly. data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations no longer does that and no one will explain why the public has a right to that data Madam Vice President, there have been calls from serious experts whose requests I have repeatedly amplified in this house about what it is they asked that record-level data be anonymized and released for analysis, which would allow for meaningful analysis of post-vaccination deaths and resolve the question of whether these experimental treatments are responsible for the rise in excess deaths once and for all.

Much more extensive and detailed data has been obtained. It has already been delivered to agricultural businesses by publicly funded bodies. Jenny Harris, director of the UK Health Security Agency, said this anonymous aggregate death by vaccination status is commercially sensitive and should not be published. This data is denied to the public. This is unacceptable. Madam Vice President. Once again, the data is hidden with impunity just like the post office scandal. Professor Harris has also backed a recent massive change to the calculation of the reference population level used by the ON to calculate excess deaths and it is incredibly complex and opaque and by sheer coincidence now appears to show that there are massive excess deaths in 2020 and 2021 and now a minimal excess death rate in 2023, according to the old calculation method tested for decades, the excess death rate in 2023 was a surprising 5% long after the pandemic ended. past and when a shortfall in deaths would be expected because, unfortunately, many people had died in previous years. 20,000 premature deaths are now being airbrushed out in 2023 alone with a new normal baseline in March.

It was shocking that things happened during the pandemic response. In March 2020, the government carried out a consultation exercise on whether people over a certain age or with certain disabilities should be imposed with a do not resuscitate order, known as a dnrs. A document summarizing the proposals was distributed to doctors and hospitals and this was mistakenly treated as formal policy by several nursing homes and GPSs across the country who enacted it. At the same time, several hospitals introduced a policy that they would not admit patients with DNR because they thought they would be overwhelmed and the result is that people died who did not need to die while the nurses danced Tick Tock very few people will know that the average age time to death from covid symptoms and positive test was 18 days, it is a little known fact that the body eliminates all viruses within around 7 days.

What really kills people is that some people, especially the vulnerable, have an excessive immune response. Doctors have been treating this for decades with steroid antibiotics for secondary pneumonia infections and other standard protocols, but this time they didn't do it even though the virus lasted a long time. the doctors left they abandoned standard clinical protocols because covid was a new virus, no it wasn't, they sent people home, told them to stay taking paracore until their lips turned blue and then when they returned to the hospital, they sedated them, put them on ventilators and what a clock. die and the protocols for the treatment of covid-19 were a binary choice between two treatment routes, once sick admitted patients were ventilated in intensive care or, if they were not suitable for that level of care, they were given end-of-life medications, including mazam. and morphine, the body responsible for this protocol ng1 163 which was published on April 3, 2020 is called the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

It is good to give mazam and morphine to people dying of cancer. It's reasonable, but it has a side effect. The side effect is that these medications have a respiratory depressant effect. It's hard to imagine, Madam Deputy Speaker, anything more stupid than giving a respiratory suppressant to someone struggling to breathe who already has symptoms of Covid-19, but that's exactly what we did, can the minister explain why mazam was removed of the same updated guideline Ng 191, which is the aner of ng1 163 on November 30, 2023, since it was removed? It is now considered and admitted that it was a mistake to ignore the warnings of so many experts and include that specific drug manglam in ng1 163 when it was introduced and it has been confirmed in letters from ministers to families who lost loved ones due to this protocol that doctors are that ministers are now saying that doors and nurses should have treated the individual patient with their own knowledge instead of strictly following the good guideline ng1 163 and if legal cases are bought for unlawful murder can the minister tell us who will take the blame ?

Will it be nice? Will it be NHS England or will it be individual doctors and nurses who will be held to account and interestingly, Vice President Nice has removed these alternative protocols, including ng1 163, from her website, although all other historical protocols still Are they there as a historical reference? Could the minister tell us why? kniv has removed this protocol from its website. Are they ashamed of the damage they caused? They certainly should be and what can we learn from this. We learn that very few doctors dare to challenge what they are told. Protocols are distributed without authors and doctors fall.

Online, there is a stark contrast in how deaths and illnesses were recorded after vaccination compared to covid after a positive covid test, any illness and any death was attributed to the virus after the experimental vaccine of emergency use, no subsequent illnesses or deaths occurred. ever attributed to the vaccine, both are completely unscientific approaches and that is why we have to look at other sources of data on excessive deaths to determine if there is a problem, but first of all I want to safely and effectively address the fear deliberately stoked by the vaccine. The government promoted the idea of ​​being rescued by a life-saving vaccine.

The singing of the safe and effective narrative began. The phrase seemed to hypnotize the entire nation. Safe and effective Madam Vice President was the motto of Sal de theide and after that, the scandal rules will be implemented to prevent such marketing in the future by agricultural companies and they are prohibited from using it safely and effectively without important warnings, but that did not matter this time because with the covid-19 vaccines the media, the government and other authorities became big marketing departments of farmers and it is very difficult now to hear the word safe without the echo of the word effect and effective, but they are not safe or effective in March 2021, when the vast majority of UK citizens have already received these novel products. fisa signed a contract with Brazil and South Africa in which the contract says that the long-term effects and effectiveness of the vaccine are not currently known and the adverse events of the vaccine are not currently known, that is word for word from the contracts fiser, so these so-called vaccines were the least effective vaccines that ever existed.

He was left with the illusion that they prevented any infection when he was at the dispatch box on January 31 at pmqs. My question followed, even the Prime Minister did not dare to add an effective Mantra to his safe, uh, when he said that the uh. in your own words the vaccine was unequivocally safe Madam Deputy Clairvoyant safe means uh no risk of death or injury why is the prime minister ignoring the 163 successful claims lodged in the vaccine damage payment scheme totaling of 19.5 million in compensation for damage caused by covid? Have these people not suffered enough from vaccines?

Those 163 victims are the tip of the iceberg, although by the way, it should be noted that the maximum payout is only £120,000, so each of these 163 victims got the maximum possible reward and that should Tell you what, that same plan compensation paid a total of just 3.5 million between 1997 and 2005 with an average of just eight claims per year and that's for all claims across the country for all vaccines administered, both for their safety and their effectiveness even . for 25 October 2020 1, the former Prime Minister and Oxbridge and South member for retirement, Boris Johnson, even admitted and again I quote that it does not protect you from getting the disease and it does not protect you from transmitting it by looking at the levels of the virus found in the wastewater show that the post-vaccine wave was of the same order of magnitude and duration as the previous waves.

This proves that the vaccines didn't change anything, they weren't safe and they weren't effective. Those who impose these vaccines knew it well. that they could never prevent infections from a disease of this type, an injection in the arm cannot do that, only immunity on the surface of the respiratory tract and lungs can prevent viral infection, antibodies in the blood cannot, in Dr.'s own words. . Fouche, Anthony F. Not surprisingly, none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have been effectively controlled by vaccines. He continued: This observation raises a question of fundamental importance whether natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not causea complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we Madam Vice President, they knew that the so-called vaccines would never protect against infection, which explains why they never tested protection against infection Madam Vice President just a few days ago the abpi the association of the British pharmaceutical industry criticized Fiser for the sixth time and said its marketing practices had brought the industry into disrepute;

They were asked to pay a poultry £30,000 in administration costs, without any fine plus Madam Vice President the person who runs The ABP at the moment is also the head of fisa UK. The MH has a legal duty to carry out this work and has handed responsibility to the industry itself. This is an

outrageous

conflict of interest, so let's get back to the excess deaths in Australia. Australian governments have launched an inquiry into their excess death problem. Australia is almost unique as a case study of excess deaths. They received the vaccine before they had covid. Their excess deaths cannot be so easily attributed to the long-term side effects of a virus and I like it because they saw an increase in deaths that started in May 2021 and has not decreased since the impact was evident in the ambulance service First South Australia saw a 67% increase in cardiac presentations in 15-44 year olds, peaking in November 2021 before Covid hit, we also saw a similarly deeply worrying effect here.

Calls to life-threatening emergencies in the UK increased from 2,000 per day to 2,500 per day in May 2021 and never returned to normal in October 2021. Despite it being spring in Australia, headlines reported about ambulances They could not leave patients in hospitals that were already at full capacity. Mark Macwan, the premier of Western Australia, said he could not explain the overwhelmed hospitals, our hospitals are under enormous pressure. He said this has been something that has never been seen before why it is difficult to know and in April 2022, at IET, Darth Queensland, the Health Minister said about the most urgent ambulance calls called codes and I quote: I don't think that No one can explain why we saw a 40% increase. codes, we just had a lot of heart attacks, chest pains and trouble breathing, breathing problems, sometimes you can't explain why these things happen, but unfortunately they happen, Madam Vice President, I think we can explain why, why this, If we look at the link to the Omicron vaccine rollout it mentioned excess deaths in Australia from 2022 onwards, however there are a large number of excess deaths before that that doctors have not been able to attribute to the virus and this death could be caused by the vaccine.

Few people even dare to ask that question, Madam President, and it is important to remember how these vaccines were traditionally manufactured. The key to making a vaccine is to ensure that the harmful pathological parts of the virus or bacteria are activated so that the recipient can develop. an immune response without the dangers of developing the disease. In stark contrast, these so-called covid vaccines use the most pathological or harmful part of the virus, the spike protein in its entirety, the damage is systemic because contrary to what everyone was told by the Lipid nanoparticles encapsulating the genetic material spread throughout the body after the injection, potentially affecting all organs at the same time, the injection calmed everyone because the injection was broken down in the arm and the injection site.

Regulators should have known these were problems, plus it is now very evident that the drug results in continuous production of Spike protein for many months, even years, in some people the deaths so far have been predominantly cardiac, but unfortunately there may be many more deaths to come, Madam Deputy Speaker, because of these new treatments and that's from inducing additional deaths from cancer Dr Robert Tindle is the reti director of the Clinical Center for Medical Virology in Brisbane and Emeritus Professor of Immunology this month. Dr. Tindle published an article highlighting the many potential harms of vaccines, including damage to the immune system which, as anyone knows, who knows. anything about biology, anything that alters the immune system can potentially increase the risk of cancer, there are many other reasons to be concerned about these vaccines inducing cancer.

Cancer is a genetic disease, a disorder that arises from errors in DNA that allow cells to grow uncontrollably. madna has multiple PSs describing methods to reduce the risk of cancer induction from its mRNA products. This risk comes from the material disrupting the patient's DNA. It turns out that what we were told about the mRNA injection actually has very high amounts of DNA. In him, this greatly increases the risks of altering the patient's own DNA, worse still, the DNA that was injected contains sequences that were hidden from the regulator. This is the sv40 promoter region or Simeon 40 virus that has been linked to cancer and has been found in the fisa vaccines this was not an accident Madam Vice President once again crucial information was hidden with absolute impunity from the regulator and the public and a study independent in Japan published last week has found links between rising cancer rates in Japan and those who took the The first and subsequent booster vaccines perhaps, Madam Vice President, that explains why Fizer acquired a cancer treatment company cancer for $43 billion earlier this year.

In conclusion, Madam Vice President, it is clear that the evidence is clear, these vaccines have caused deaths and, despite this, They have been described as safe and effective, but for a proportion of the people who received them, the vaccines have caused harm serious injuries and death and will have increased the risk of cancer for many more. They are not effective either. The vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission. and when the data are analyzed objectively, they also do not prevent serious illness or death. These are very difficult truths to face, but we must face them, Madam Vice President, if we are to learn the lessons of recent years.

Sometime. We will have to face that all the evidence is piling up, it was quite convincing 18 months ago when I first spoke, now it is unequivocal, so I asked the camera, it is time to remove politics from our science and we have to give some back real science to our politics. I asked the House to support today's motion for Baroness Hallet's inquiry to open module four on the safety and efficacy of experimental CO9 vaccines and, given the evidence, Madam Deputy Speaker, I call the government once. again immediately suspend the use of all mRNA treatments in both humans and animals pending the outcome of that in uh no no no we wouldn't have to clean the gallery if the applause continues I would order it if necessary no the question is As in paper order