Der Bauhauspanzer? Der Tiger I als Objekt des Industriedesigns

Welcome to a special video, especially for two reasons: first of all, the video you are about to see has a completely different format, I recorded it or it was recorded by professionals at a conference, which means I am live in front of the people and. Tell something, lecture and talk, not like you usually do here in a quiet studio, which is a little impersonal, but it's basically live action you're seeing. I hope it is entertaining for you. The conference took place at the 2022 tank conference and this conference is something special. As far as we know, this conference is, at least for the German-speaking area, the first conference of historical specialists to be organized through crowdfunding.

The two organizers, Bernhard. Military historian Kast and military aviation historian Christoph Bergs have started a crowdfunding project with the intention of adding a new facet to scientific communication in Germany, instead of academics always being among themselves and They limit themselves to telling each other what they have just discovered. conferences at universities and research institutes, the tank conference idea has the money through crowdfunding to bring it and implement it in such a way that normal people can attend this conference and not just people who belong anyway because of University. suspension It was a super exciting approach to just show the results of what we do directly, it's basically like YouTube offline, it was completely revolutionary and that's why I was happy to participate and more people participated in total. five lectures: Christoph and Bernhard, who also gave presentations, then Roman Pöppel, Jens Wehner and myself, and together we gave five lectures.

That day it was only possible because the Bavarian Army Museum served as the venue for the conference, we were able to stay in a really great room and the director of the museum is called Ansgar, he himself gave a welcome speech, it was a really great place, it was a great event and um. The result was a really good conference, so the lectures I heard were all exciting, but mine you have to decide right away, um, the discussions after the lectures were always very good and all the conversations along the way, a coffee break before and after, which is what it was about getting to know each other and not just seeing each other through the camera and monitors, it was really stimulating and pleasant, it was a lot of fun and there are thoughts of not taking no result from it, but there is still time, it will.

It definitely takes time. A really great day, but a day like that passes and then it's a thing of the past and it would be nice if something more sustainable remained of these things and two sustainable things remain of this conference. On the other hand, you can watch the entire conference, that is, all the conferences plus all the debates and see a final debate online in video form, I think about four and a half hours or so, because the whole construction has to last , it is not funded by the university, it is not funded by a research institute or a foundation, the two organizers who make their living with this type of actions also believe that it is completely legitimate to receive a little money and, above all, the prices are excellent.

If you want to buy the video it costs 27 euros, but if you only want to see it once, rent it, which will be the normal way of consumption. It's 7 euros for, as I said, more than 4 hours of conferences and debates. a great price I think you can find these lectures on I have to watch I like to watch it, send it for Christmas, the second sustainable thing that was created, now it is running a little short for Christmas, but you can also treat yourself. to something like that, it has become a classic book, so it is actually in a somewhat unusual A4 format, but not bad.

Hardcover with all the lectures except one, namely mine, I'll get to that in a moment, but with additional contributions, so There are a total of 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 essays complete with footnotes and everything you need, very well done if you are interested. If you are interested in tanks, then this book belongs to your library and you can also buy it. this book and now you can buy it again here. I put the link again at the bottom of the YouTube area, so my lecture is not in the book because it is relative. It quickly became clear that he would not be able to arrive in time. and that is why you see this video because, so to speak, we have created a style in which this lecture that I gave in Ingolstadt, which is not available in print, will be released as a single, the oldest among them will be other albums . and the singles are released and featured on our YouTube channel without Paypal, the idea behind it is that I can do that.

I am currently advertising the book for the videos behind PayPal for the large Bavarian Army Museum in Ingolstadt, which I am doing here. again and we are going to have another component on our YouTube channel with a very interesting topic, which I think we can present that complements our collection, that is the advantage we have and I really think about the topic. Really exciting, I don't think anyone. has addressed the tank or a tank from a design point of view, this is really just a first impression. I'm excited to see what kind of comments come in.

I had a lot of fun and it was very stimulating and I hope you like it. It's also a fun thing I'd like to add because it came up in the discussion on the day of the conference and now I can give it to you ahead of time so you don't have to think about what the audience was like at the conference. In the conference you are about to see, I often talk about what Erwin, the main developer of the Tiger, said about design, product design, and I thought that these thoughts are not reflected in the Tigers and the Tiger as a whole , whether what he had in mind can somehow be seen there, but as most of you know, Krupp made the design of the tower of the Erwin ah, that does not have the general design, but the design of the tower was of Krupp in an external company, while everything was used by itself and is like that.

We don't know exactly if he had influence on the group or not, if there was a creative exchange or a discussion, but that's not the point because the question is whether or not Erwin's thoughts about the

tiger

are applicable to the finished product he likes. He then says that it works even if the parts were designed from somewhere else, so whether his ideas are applicable to the Tiger is still correct, even if the tower comes from Krupp, it is not very clear in the lecture, it is mentioned, so there is a quote there, what is said in it is the design of the tower of ah, that in itself, so it is not there, but this is how it is clarified beforehand so that you can watch the video a little more relaxed.

And you don't have to ask yourself these difficult questions, the doctor doesn't know that the AH that the tower hasn't designed what the public has to see. A conference preparation video also has advantages. ahead that have proven to be important. So that's all. I hope you enjoy the conference. I hope you are interested in writing it. Your comments are still a void, I am very excited and there are people out there. who really deal with design scientifically or historically and/or historically and find it exciting, but something stupid is maybe a good thing, people easily like what they do as a full-time job, then contact me.

The email is on the museum's website. I look forward to the exchange. I hope and can imagine that there will be even more power from this topic. Let's see. Thank you very much and now have fun, so make it comfortable for the next two hours. It will be fun, no, actually what I want. What I'm doing today is something completely different from what we've done so far and that's not a bad thing to clear your head a little. Today we approach the

tiger

as a design object, hence the question: Why was the Tiger designed? The way it was designed?

Why does it seem that way and what does that affect us? So the first question to ask yourself is why do we do it? The answer is relatively simple. product for that. It's also really cool that Jen's talk was something that is designed and then built in the factory. It is an industrial product and you cannot design an industrial product. I don't think it's important. We can't stop being trapped, but it can't be you who have to design it and the question why the tiger is also easily answered in our tank museum and you will also know that the tiger.

Even people who aren't familiar with tanks recognize that the shape is well known, the silhouette is well known, and people who don't normally react so emotionally to tanks sometimes say oh, but that's interesting, it's beefy or massive or elegant, let's be clear. to what we can now analyze about the design. There is a very nice quote from Gerd Selle to one of the main print designers who deals with it together, why should you analyze it? And he says, "nothing is obvious about the design you have." He must discover why a product is considered beautiful, what its character is based on, who produces it, for whom and why it fascinates him and what is hidden under its skin.

The end of the quote is perfect for the tiger, so why is it fascinating? Why is it perceived as beautiful? beautiful what is hidden under the steel armor we cannot do everything but we do a little of it and if you want to do that says Gerd Selle in reality you have to do everything possible, first you have to start with an analysis of form because what see what you have there and you have to continue with the design history, the production history, the reception analysis, the impact history? It's all super exciting and you have to do that, of course we don't have time for that and they will. so to speak, freed from work and wars, today only the analysis of form, so what does the tiger look like and what does that do to people?

I will say a few things like, for example, the correct cut, there are many psychological studies on advertising, design, colors, typography, etc., and so on, and at least for the Western world when it comes to my literature, that is a good research and all the statements of course are like that, usually there are exceptions and it could be them too or sometimes I feel different from what the book says, but on average the analyzes that were carried out are or are the result of these analyses. The design is not arbitrary, it is predictable and its effect is predictable on average only as a statistical average that does not stop there.

Right away, that's not quite right, other people ask the first question, what is industrial design or product design? You can exchange both words. I think industrial design is better, it is something relatively fascinating and I like working with quotes. , then the next one is for you industrial design, the conception and planning of products for mass production is a creative inventive process that involves bringing together factors as different as construction technology, materials and aesthetics, so that something is designed, designed for mass production, that is why industrial design and technology must be used. The construction objectives and the desired aesthetics are more or less united.

That's what industrial design is all about today and why you want it. There is a wonderful quote from Richard Lobby, one of the most famous designers in the world. If you have two products that are equal in price, function and quality, then the more attractive exterior will prevail in the market. Let's say you founded your railway line. in 1935 and now you buy your first locomotives, you can buy this locomotive or you can buy it, you can buy this locomotive. The reaction is clear, not again, so I know I will definitely see that later, some kind of railway fans, I know they are not technically comparable, that's unfair, but the effect is there and you know what I mean and It was a little heartbreaking to think about.

When it comes to industrial design, don't think about Colani's crazy vices from the 80s. Industrial design is mostly. Going back, this is a good example. On the left, the worm gear was simply assembled by the engineer and on the right, the same thing was solved together with a designer, this is from the 70s, after the 70s, this is now. nothing great, but you see the difference, one is also designed, remember, you can't not design, but the other is obviously designed more to assert itself in the market, so after the prologue we get to the introduction, you see that you have to do it. deal with a lot of things today you have to One thing is explained in advance if you are not working in design and that is what people 30 years old and older doOn average, the 40s were thought to be beautiful and well designed or designed, and everyone us too, because there is a very long design line that is important if we take on the Tiger right away, I promise you it will all come. al Tigre, there are still tanks from the 19th and early 20th centuries but above all the 19th century is characterized by a battle between two styles, between two designs in everything I talk about furniture, architecture, clothing, tableware. , cutlery, wallpaper, anything that is a vestige of feudal style, think of aristocracy, think of monarchy, think of gilded frames, think of ruffled collars, everything that is pompous, everything that isnoble, monarch, aristocratic.

In the 19th century something is different from this: on the contrary, the bourgeois aesthetic develops, think of the simple Biedermeier cabinets, the cylinder and the black set of simple cutlery without gold decorations, which is the bourgeois aesthetic and which is still used today. still shapes what we find beautiful, that is, moving on to the functionalism of modernity, what that is, you will also learn that the point is that there is a long line from what people perceive as beautiful that runs through the tiger to us, which means that we can immediately answer the question of why our contemporaries perceived the tiger as something rude and we can also answer it homogeneously for those who now say hey, there was a little more, it's true, we still have to add two things, there were two other brief developments, the representative style was the attempt to unite the two, now you can think of captains of industry, an office like that, actually bourgeois, but with gilded ashtrays etc., that was the idea to be able to somehow put this together and become a little king like that hasn't become popular and the other thing is Art Nouveau, so if you think about nature, the ornaments, the curved lamps and so on, that was all there, That's what I'm going to say here, now not everything is binary but the line goes simply from bourgeois aesthetics to functionalism and today, that's what we also feel in our design, it takes UPS and functionalism is relatively easy to define.

The date is boring now. Take it out immediately once briefly on functionalism. He moved away from the fact that, firstly, the form of an object only has to follow the function and should not have any superfluous decoration and, secondly, the conditions of industrial production demand a simple and standardized geometric design language and This, as we know in the recent past, determined something exclusively aesthetic definition of official industrial design Design was important at the same time for a long time with the simplification of forms these are the three things that you should carry with you, it has been in force for 70 years at least for 120 years without superfluous simple geometric decoration. form the language form the simplification and as everyone knows the tiger, little by little they see where the journey is going who does it most of the time the people who made it did it, the craftsman thinks what, thinks about it and can take it carried out immediately, it is brought into the world with industrialization, it is separated, no one has to think about anything before so that the factory workers can do it.

That is the separation of the two things and as a general rule the design is done by engineers. and designers. The word is used in a mixed way in the 19th and 20th centuries. There are some exotic people that come in like Behrens, for example, people like architects or other artists that come in and let's start with some things about design. the first industrial products that look somehow different but don't really catch on. They can understand that designers give industrial products to design as a job as a dedicated person who is involved in the coming process.

We really are in the 20th century, now you can do it. Of course, well, but if you build a machine, first it has to work, but that is culturally and historically unsustainable because the people back then, the designers and the engineers already had demands and some of them had a relatively classical education. Not all of them but some of them and there is an innovative essay from 1913 where an engineer thought of putting it on paper and I found a nice quote for you because it really is a defense of his own position that was then decisive for a long time, the idea is completely sufficient for the jure that a building is a device, a machine that creates it serves a purpose.

Utility Erik has no idea that he has anything to do with beauty, then he goes on to say that designers are meant to make things. useful 1913 we are now at the time when Erwin Aders, who later designed the tiger, is studying and beginning to work on combining beauty with the useful, these are things that people are thinking about 20 years later, a very essay important again o It was not a letter to the editor, but an essential text of the form that was, so to speak, the design magazine that emerged at that time and Kerstin writes about mechanical engineering, a formal language has been developed that every engineer uses , the formal technical language.

The language partly sets standards and, for the rest, results from the purpose and The material generally has quite a shape so far, so clear that machines with the same power can be built, but beautiful and less beautiful machines, it is known that there is a pure engineering profession and there is some artistic creativity among engineers, there are more malleable forces than are exploited, but here there is still no selection because the profession of the artist engineer in our sense has not yet been discovered. Today's designers are aware of it, they are playing with it, they are thinking about it, they still exist, not the dedication to it but they do it, so it's not that form is only determined by function, but there is a lot of thinking about it. very much and I appreciate you making this small contribution to Jens.

Automobile construction is the root of many of the armored approaches and is only in the tens of the 1920s, but only in the early 30s. manufacturing and here you can see an application from the Wehrmacht magazine from the year 1936. You can see that some typical car builds just a little bit to capture the design language of that era and yet there is no real designer. Christoph Reifenrath wrote like this forever from the drafts, modeling and cutting of bodies, those creative specialists were able to qualify as designers, he spent almost half the time Automobile history of the century Bodywork Schneider is absolutely right, by the way, it was made of wood and then the body was cut to size and placed on it as decoration, but as I said, there is a design language but it has not really been developed yet, but and now that the first reference is slowly coming to light, Tiger had also modernist functionalist considerations for automobile design at the time.

At the same time, Walter Gropius, the leader of the Bauhaus movement, also designed cars, among other things, and this is his bunk bed, which looks completely different from what we just saw in the advertising and if we take a little bit of these large areas and you are. hard lines, the vertical shapes, then someone once said it was the tiger of the road back then and now the circle is slowly closing, getting there Gropius has the car as far as I know, I don't know anything, he said you can quote what a brochure said that it was something very beautiful at that time, the degree of beauty of a car depends on the harmony of its external appearance with the logic of its technical function, not on the ingredient of ornaments, and it has to be the organism perfect technician. finds its worthy complement in a mature and well-proportioned form, the aesthetic senses function in the same way as the technical apparatus itself, so what Mottesius and Kersting said before is captured here in an advertising brochure that says: buy this car because here technical maturity is a well proportioned shape etc. they go hand in hand that's what the car dealer wanted the beautiful pure shape for a designed product and now I have to take them on a short excursion because now we are slowly approaching after 30 years we have been there. they have this automotive technology on the pages and so on and the question is often asked: did National Socialism have its own form?

That's pretty exciting. Is there somehow its own form or design in National Socialism from the year 33 onwards? basically not because, first of all, the Nazis did it beforehand, they did not offer their own aesthetic when the NSDAP came to power and of course even if they had, they would not have been able to somehow convene hundreds of designers on the It's better than suddenly putting a completely new design language on the table in furniture, houses and clothing, etc. it could mean that Peter Rich wrote it so beautifully, the formal language so the products hardly changed, only the ideological justification had to be modified or exchanged and now people were talking about their own practicality, so it's not just about the pure form but of its own style.

Convenience, that is, the racist was introduced and then it takes effect in such a way that all the designers sank half sank, half stopped, let it line up from the beginning, they decide that the German Werkbund itself decides, I think with 31 or two people, immediately disband and align them and then form their own associations and then they are happy to be integrated. in the Reich Chamber, where they were then controlled by the state with the aim that the Nazis wanted the modern forms of the products of the 1920s to continue being manufactured, without any problems, simple shape, simple design.

Everything is becoming modern and you know. razors and so on from that time, everything is quite modern, but not like in the 20s, so you could even have social reformist demands so that in some way you can be an individual and there is diversity, but with the force of people. It was said that a standard set of everyday objects should be created that should last a long time for the national community, so that all these fashions and these individualities eventually disappear, which means that the national community should really be shaped by standardized products, including everyday life and each object, the way they would have treated it was standardized so it should look modern but please stay that way and Sabine Zentdecker wrote so beautifully that it was not the shape of the objects but their political function that gave The Nazi architecture was shaped by the Aryan vision of humanity, the regime primarily fought against individuality and therefore presented itself as countermodern because controlled National Socialist modernity was fundamentally different from the autonomous, cosmopolitan and experimental modernity that was had been able to develop during the Weimar Republic; this was only a brief advantage if we wanted to discuss the path immediately, so now they have done it, now comes the tiger, which means Now I have done the long line, functionalism, industrial design, now comes Erwin Adas and says , it opens in the morning and then an army weapons guy stands there and says: Now we have to build a tank, okay, let's eat. , we have to wonder what kind of ideas Erwin had that the lead designer had and he wrote something about how he sees it, co-creation and design and technology products, first of all he wrote it in a document from February 45th.

Responsibility and credit are distributed in the development tasks between the corresponding military service department of your arms office and the company Henschel and Son, neither one nor the other can claim the entire service for themselves and reject the responsibility that in the end they assumed, which is quite correct. For our needs, it's a bit unbalanced. The Army Ordnance Office has been quite specific about what the Tiger should be able to do. There were some very precise specifications and they were set down to the millimeter as to how high the barrel would free float. the roof should and it was said that the tower should be low but we should look at the HW regardless that was the task of Henschel and son and in this case Erwin Aders Erwin Aders said that an object is beautiful when it honestly emphasizes its purpose wrote essays as a student and in one of them he wrote a quote that beauty must arise from itself through an honest emphasis on purpose and back then the statement was not as evident as it seems today 61 that is, one of his basic statements If I design a technical device like that and at that point you already have cars, trucks, etc., if I design it in a way that what it is supposed to do is clearly reflected in its design language, then it will be nice to have them all. tiger in the head could be that could be that will be seen in a moment and said in another place we have a kind of farm from Tuesday 1960 because it moves over a herd of artists once tried to work in a company where he worked Design that is quite silly .

Then he said that, apart from his fantasy, he was an interesting and educated person and artist, but he could not dissuade me from what I myself recognized and worked in truth to be pleasing forms of beauty. combine with practicality Thinking in the highest sense, maturity brings with it the organic, which is why I really hate the new, the overly popular sheet metal fabrication, as I call it, on the hoods and front ends of non-modern cars and trucks, this fashion that comes to us from the USA, so this change of chrome, components and decorations, etc., as I said, the technical maturity of the vehicle must bring with it an organic beauty, you have to create it yourself and here again the two quotes from Gropius and adas so adas uses almost the same words Gropius has similar ideas about what a beautiful design should look like and that's why with a little heresy you could say that the Tiger 1 was the first Bauhaus tankand I hope.

I hope the design community gets back to me so we can figure this out further, hello camera, so I'm excited to see what happens next, but let's try it, we have to try it, you or I have to do it. Try it too, this theory is an idea, why did he write it to me so little, he himself said it in a nice sentence, he wrote it in a letter, he was referring to engineers who not only draw but rarely can design. He has a penchant for writing, so really good people like him keep to themselves, but he also says design and draw, so building and designing go together, you have to be able to do both and they remember, we have the gift of form, but we form them.

It's not something like that that makes the Tiger a good design. One thing you may notice is this famous golden ratio that you know from discussions about car models. The golden ratio says that there must be a certain golden ratio defined very precisely. asymmetric distribution between two routes As with the autofront, these two parts are the hull as the dominant element and the Thomas as the dominant element and theoretically you should get to 38.2% to 61.8% and the Tiger doesn't exactly get there, but it is very close to it and it is closer than all the other tanks except one and now I know which tank has the golden ratio emitted by me, so to make it clear that that is a very important thing, other tanks do not have that at all, so the Sherman It's not even close to that here, there's nothing better, but mathematically speaking, the tower is still too small, forget that it's too small, it's close and it doesn't come and you often hear that it has a tiger like that. -Appearance similar to one of the reasons is that the distribution is close and now the resolution of which tanks are actually closer to the golden ratio to the decimal place T34 76 to the decimal place of the golden ratio which means the two most tanks iconic tanks of World War II are also the two most recognized tanks.

The two tanks from a wide range of products are now the only ones that exactly or almost exactly meet the golden ratio and now I will anticipate one thing for the next one. things, there is no master aspect that says that is why the Tiger is so popular. Now I'm going to show you a bunch of them, various factors and my thesis is that this package makes the tiger too good. Industrial design was the first factor. Well, the PowerPoint is taken that looked much better before, but now we stupidly continue with the design conference you remember and that's why I brought these long quotes, good industrial design, functionalism is a simplification of form, geometric shapes, no target wheel on the left, the typical German tank in front. of the tiger to the right of the tiger and you can see that a little to the left variety of shapes you see many small dominant areas in a wide variety of shapes they have different lines and they have planes.

Above all, unclear lines because there is so much rubbish mounted on the vehicle, nothing is smooth on the right, some shapes, some surfaces, clear lines at the latest when the front loader is omitted again at the end of the production line. It has to work in the overall design analysis. It doesn't have to be exactly true, it is clear to me that the front of the Tiger has of course caused a bit of a stir due to the optics that are still there, but the appearance of the front is a rectangle, in these stories it is it's a lot about appearance and there may be different opinions, but basically it's here again if you can see, remember the simplification of the shape on the left, a lot of things mounted, a lot of small components on top. number of elements that is what in design analysis is called high complexity and low order or a little frivolous says that it is messy it looks messy to the right of the tiger they have a small number of low complexity elements to make it look orderly see how good the design is very clear you can see on the front the screwed hooks on the left and very delicately executed on the right perfect industrial design is completely removed, added to the front, very discreetly, it just doesn't matter what it is, from what we're talking now, good industrial design, that's a bit like the transition from Nokia mobile phones to the iPhone, that's what you see here if you look at the golden ratio and the lines and the shape.

Now, understand a little about the impression he just started talking about and it becomes even clearer. I have to give you a quote again from the standard work on the impact of design that everyone knows about building cars or motorcycles etc. continue designing, resting, pushing, stable, tippy, dancing, being powerful and creating your own effect, it is about something that has an effect on you, simple lines, curves and shapes convey certain design qualities through structure, scaffolding , they already have an Effect, tank, nice photo from the side, but if you look at them, the lines of the vehicle look very messy.

The lines of the vehicle go in all possible directions to make it clearer again, so if you continue with the main lines then it's messy. Tiger, they remind you of the honest emphasis on purpose, that is, the honest emphasis on purpose, that's what makes Tiger work as an industrial design, among other things, because you can see what it's doing from the lines. Different forms also have different psychological effects. Does the diagonal line act as a balance-maintaining action and is therefore particularly dynamic? This is the idea here that you can see that exactly the same rectangle appears more static, consistently hard or, depending on the size, also bulky and bulky, at right angles and rectangles are unnatural and have a connotation of protection and self-affirmation.

Nothing could be clearer than this is the chest that the tiger offers, so a lot of humanization applies to the vehicles. Maybe even in today's cars it's the wide hood that delivers. the vehicle because it has large recognizable empty areas and the sides of the square are not inclined and are no longer my rectangle, the shape gains dynamism through movement and diagonal and of course that happens with the tiger, even if you have the surfaces that go diagonally, they have exactly these trapezoids that also radiate a certain dynamic in the lateral optics. The other point that people keep telling us at the museum is that the tiger is stocky, it looks very strong, and stocky pareidolia is our drive. we see shapes of faces or body parts on technical things and the MG cover is the internet classic, how can you see a body part on a tank, speaking a little more seriously, we mainly see faces, the effect everyone knows .

This is done consciously. You want the vehicle to exude a certain characteristic by giving them faces, but tanks are also just vehicles. That's what many of our visitors say. I see 40-2 eyes on the Amazon rangefinder. I have a lot of fun with them, even more clearly now that they've seen it too. Now I don't even have to click. You can see it quite funny. A friend of mine said he sees it completely differently. He doesn't see this face. He sees this one. face but they see it and the bad thing is that once you have seen it, you can no longer see it.

Now you'll always see the tank destroyer like this or the way a shape affects us is primarily shaped by our own. bodily behavior and the experiences of our body, that is, we project the shape of the body, dimensions, proportions and possibilities of movement. The vehicle becomes bulky when it has a shape that appears non-polar, for example, you can see it very well thanks to this talented artist who briefly shows it to you. Another thing that caught my attention, which I also immediately implemented into an image, was that someone. By the way, through this cubic structure of the vehicle, a word was also applied to Gropius' car. the stacking has the effect of making the vehicle very stable like a castle and you can actually deduce that a little bit if you eat, if you look at it like that then you can come to this association if you want or what we have already heard is when the fog throwers they're old, they're not always, so there are some people who really have this robust idea, so it's all paradoline and recognition that you or anthropomorphization.

As the saying goes, the suckling tiger everything can work, which I am. Right now I say that not everything has to work for everyone, but I believe that most things work for most people. If you wanted to go further in the analysis, you would also have to use the Tiger brand analysis, it all belongs to industrial design. use in propaganda association spaces for the tiger to be alone in the empty area of ​​the Eastern Front is also something that is related to the mark, which is an image that students can invoke what the opponent says about the Tiger, muting , that's all that defines the Tiger brand, that's the Porsche brand and never mind the Audi brand, they don't have time again, that means we'll take a quick look at the pictures. , very very current propaganda preparation, save gas for them Armor but here is the tiger in curves and flying in formation with a plane, so it is given an energy and a lethality, a predatory quality that artistically is very interesting and if you look in Google a little later and look at all the photos, fortunately the Federal Archives has an incredible amount of photos that were uploaded by the pk people, that is, the propaganda company.

The people who photographed the tiger according to orders always made sure to photograph it from the bottom right or the bottom left. if possible, because then they have this effect that continues what the tiger is. It's supposed to be that way, some of them were even smarter and worked out individual aspects. You can see how the image is merged into the string to create this. dynamic, but I found just one small detail to be quite exciting. That's Matt Easton, he's a YouTuber. I really guess if you want to know something about swords, watch the channel, great guy and somehow I happened to see the video the day before yesterday.

With this lecture prepared, we looked at the tigers and then the weather. He sent me a photo through other Twitter users. It's a great time we live in and you can see this is a photo of the T-shirt from the tank museum shop in Bowlington unfortunately it's not available online that's why we have to use the chest but you can see that again in the upper left a typical photo was taken in the lower left and this lethality represents the agility in the front it is in the 11 o'clock position the robustness the vehicle stands there like a pyramid and looks at it and here the tiger like the brand you see from there quentinofilm is well organized and continues to this day and that leads us to the conclusion : I have no idea how long I have used it so far, whether you like the tiger or not, or you like the Tanks or not, it is a successful industrial design, it is a functionalism cast in armored steel.

It's the Bauhaus tank, I'll stay. with it now, now it's going to be my only gimmick, I'm going to keep doing it now, there's no spectacular use aspect, not that you can say it makes the Tiger great, but it's this multitude of things that I have. presented briefly and after what you read from A, after we have read some of Hotelsius and Kerstin, not everyone will have sat down and designed the shape and then put the tiger or designed the tiger and then given the shape, but He will have had it in his head, he will have thought about it because the design is very homogeneous with what Adas has said over the decades and that is why it is the prototype of the modern design tank and that is now the perspective for 30 seconds because it has been playing for the last ten years Correct design made by the designer and the designer for sales, suddenly a role in the design target of the company has several orders on its website, for example, the terrier and on the left is how it is built and then there was the order to change the front because the material must definitely be used to build and on the right the planned new front is designed and you can see a little of itThis robustness and this modern design of modern cars is not so awesome.

I find it most impressive that here on the left is the Mongoose as it was originally available and the Bundeswehr wanted to buy it and the Bundeswehr said it was not military enough. us, it wasn't martial and the soldiers' ability to not leave the pools is certainly broken and so are the opposing soldiers and then targetdesign converted the Mungo this way and on the right it really came into action and yeah, the fat tires. Of course, it has utility and is fine, the raised front with the small windshield. Of course, it's harder to shoot, but suddenly the thing isn't armored, this robustness it radiates is just a façade.

Below is the gardener's small car, which can be seen. As you can see on the left it is still the moon, which means that here the design is really done to sell an object and that's it. The point is that the market situation has no longer changed so that the Federal Republic is giving orders, but rather the Federal Republic. The manufacturers ofguns now have to try to sell their cars and then they end up with something like this and that's it, thank you very much.