QUANTENTELEPORTATION | #2 Das rätselhafte Gewebe der Wirklichkeit

Hello dear people, I welcome you to another video about the worldview of physics and this is the second part of a lecture I gave in General Studies at the University of Konstanz on Monday, December 5, 2022 and the first part was my voice . I wasn't really in shape, so after about 45 minutes I had to stop the first part, which was already published and now it's time for the second part, that's why the title of the lecture is part 2, the enigmatic fabric of reality. , yes and in summary the first part First of all, very briefly, last time I outlined the world view of physics and I thought we are building a universe and what do we need as building blocks for it? time, elementary particles, natural forces and nature could do that and that is.

The vision of the world is that he is materialistic, these elementary particles are little balls in the natural forces, they are a kind of springs and everything has been unwinding since the Big Bang, so that is the next component, the story of creation from the Big Bang, mechanically until it finally dies a cold death and has a certain similarity to a steam engine or, in my opinion, also to the piston of a combustion car. There is also a spark plug that does not sell it and eventually exhaust gases are emitted. Yes, it's a very materialistic idea, this normal view of the world of physics, yes, and then the thing is that physics actually covers everything.

Physics has the right to explain everything, there is nothing more than this rather materialistic, machine-like view of the world, and I was already in this first part and it was about the world of a really big one. Cosmology Surprise, of course, there may be many more than these 13.7 billion light years, not a diameter, a radius, so, 27, twice, 13.7 billion light years, a sphere in diameter, but maybe this Google is just a small part of a megaverse. I know if you have one like that. If you speculate, you will get into a lot of trouble. You better be up there, um, yeah, down at the top.

I would have said that with one, but stay in these narrow areas of the current worldview, but there are hints that. When you look at the world, the worldview that they give is crude and incomplete, so there is evidence that inflation and anisotropies and then in the first part I addressed the first big question of two and it is this strange adaptation of the natural constants. the natural forces that can somehow give us if it is a little different then the universe would be sterile according to what we know and it is a little strange yes we are of the opinion that it is pure coincidence yes it seems to me a bit of an unsatisfactory answer, especially if there are 20 or 30 The natural constants are the ones that have to be correct to some extent, so the first big question and there are four answers that I talked about last time.

Today the second part is about the world. of the very small, as I said, is after this conference at the Studium Generale. By the way, you can also see it on the university's YouTube channel and it has the same title, the enigmatic fabric of reality, so in the second part Here, the great conference only had one part, there is no rest if it rains immediately in General Studies, but here I just had to take a break for croaking well, so the second number is the first, the second big question, information, yes, life. or consciousness or mind or something like that that doesn't really happen in physics, it's a machine universe, there are gears and the usual ones with errors connected and that was it, there is actually no information, yes, and why is there but information and in life and then I want to refer to a motto by John Wila, I think Bits yes, it is possible that even information can play a very important fundamental role in our universe until now, hopelessly underestimated by the materialistic spirit of the time and, again the second point in the world is very big now in the world it's a very small reality outside of spacetime and that's where it gets really scary when you look at it it's actually quite scary but I think this quantum teleportation and I want it briefly here. in this lecture is very scary, so now the second big question about the role of information in the worldview of physics, yes, we can, first of all, ask what is really in formation is a bit of a fuzzy term, anyway case is something in the material, so there are no lucky people who are connected to the feathers, first of all in our normal human world it is an exchange of signals, so when I read the book or I am making this video here or I am listening to the radio o I see a sign that says it must turn right now, these are information carriers and what is crucial is, for example, the meaning or the text of a book that I can copy on other media, for example an artist or simply when I read.

So they are acoustic waves and they are converted in the listener's brain into electrical impulses between neurons, so the real meaning is independent of the carrier, so it can be any carrier and is always material. Physics has clear difficulties in understanding it. this information like anything, yes and classically we looked for philosophy, I once did, so a conscious living being is always necessary, that is, a human being that understands the information because if an animal is now like, for example, a dog reading a book It probably doesn't work, so at first you think that a dog or an earthworm doesn't understand the content of a book, so we need intelligent living beings to get the information, okay, but then we discover that animals and so on also dogs or birds or even single-celled organisms that exchange signals with each other that were facing predators or give these bee dances they give signals to find food and that is also symbolic information so certain dance movements of the bees but maybe you have already seen them on television So one bee now tells the other bees in the hive where a food source can be found, certain movements in this dance of the bees have a certain meaning and that is called symbolic information because that is what it is, it simply has to determined in that way when left If you stretch your leg then that means flying towards the east and not towards the west, yes and it goes further because if we look at our living beings then every living being is the end. , the current end of an infinitely long chain, not infinite, but 4.3 or 4.6 billion years of living beings, each living being has ancestors and these ancestors transmit the model of the living being to the offspring that are then develops accordingly and this model is written or encoded in the genetic material of DNA or when we go to simple living beings like single-celled organisms or Going back even more to viruses, it is more like single-stranded genetic material, chain molecules, with viruses, you can They argue about whether they are alive, so let's take very simple bacteria, yes, there we also have an information carrier, that is the DNA or that Erna in the sequence of these four nucleic acids and they encode the model and that is also in accordance with the opinion of the people who invented it.

Is this information symbolic? There are four letters that repeat in a certain way, just like our 26 letters, and it speaks of the model of a living being. Richard Dorkins did it in his book The God Delusion, I think you could even say: I think he also says that information is life and life is information, the basis of life is the information that is encoded in this is the model of the living being. that is, information is actually the essence of the entire area of ​​the living world and the area we have of the dead world, such as on the Moon or Mercury, where there is probably no life and no information according to common opinion. information belongs to the area of ​​life, so it can really be found everywhere, but not in the area of ​​dead matter.

Information does not occur in inanimate nature and now I have put a question mark on it because that is what it is about. Then neurophysics even says exactly what this motto is: eating Bits is symbolic and also knowing that there is something like being Bit comes from information that information is even the basis of everything real is a bit of. an extreme thesis, but there are arguments in favor and that means that there must be information in inanimate nature, if information is an exchange of signals, then it represents. The question arises in the unpopular nature of who emits the signals and who receives them, and we are now immersing ourselves in the world is very small in quantum physics, yes, and when physicists masters, of course, give a semester-long lecture full about this, but now what to do, yeah, so let's say how many hours there are, then 46 hours of lecture and then an introduction.

For you, there is a lot of mathematics that you will miss hearing and seeing, but we will just do the double column experiment at this point, it is a fundamental experiment of quantum physics and this experiment really works wonders. Sources with light waves and es. It's easy to do with normal classical physics. I don't need quantum physics at all because if we use it here as a source, a light beam, for example, would have to be monochromatic, that is, a better color than a laser beam like this. one, I don't know if you can see it, so there's a nice red here, but it's not just red, it's also an exactly monochromatic laser, that is, monochromatic of one wavelength, so you have one of these in the lessons of the school, learn that. maybe I still don't know a plane wave with certain sine shape as given here and I send it to the double slit and the two slits must be close enough to each other and also very narrow in their wavelength range of light then come back here there is an interference pattern, that is, waves can interfere and there is a stripe pattern that keeps it dark, yes, if there were not so much interference and diffraction now, these strange phenomena would occur or they are not really strange, that also works with water waves. but these phenomena that are typical of waves, if that did not happen and that does not happen if the spaces are much larger and farther apart, much larger than the wavelength of the wave that I am radiating, then I simply see two bars bright ones where the light passes between them is dark when I make the work smaller and bring it closer, then there is diffraction and the difference and I see a bright one in the middle, so it is assumed that this one that is black is actually a bright one that is inverted , so there is a lot of light here and I see a striped pattern that I am looking for on the right and left because the brightness spreads quite a bit and that is called the interference pattern and that can be explained well in the wave. image because, for example, where it is dark now there are white stripes in the middle where no light reaches, two waves can interfere destructively.

So don't take a ray from one slit and a ray from the other slit and approach each other. each other in such a way that they oscillate exactly in antiphase due to the difference in path length and at any time the two sine waves add up to 0 in the dark. Well, destructive interference and a little bit of a different angle where now there's a bright fringe, the oscillations are the same and then that adds twice the amplitude and we have a bright fringe, yes, that works with waves. Waves can superimpose each other destructively or constructively, yes, so far, let's go to quantum physics or.

Do we do that with Milano particles so that they have to be small characters in particular, do they have to see through space? Sorry, so in particular they have to pass through space, but not only like that, but it is also important that the mass of the characters is very small because then the wavelength of these pieces is the wavelength that is the wavelength of matter then becomes quite long, so you actually have to do experiments with columns that can still be reasonably manufactured because even with the signs of the column and the distance between them. the two columns must be in the order of magnitude of the wavelength and in the case of dams, this is the wavelength of the matter, which is the wavelength of the chunk and scales with the mass, the larger it is the mass, the shorter the wavelength.

The wavelength is and then it becomes so short that you are again in the case that you simply have two bright bars there where the particles pass, the double slit casts a kind of shadow, but if you take particles with little mass and also at a relatively low speed, then they become more and more wave-like in character and then this experiment, for example, works with electrons in the same way as with light waves and can be seen here. There's an interference pattern on the back, yeah that's a little bit very strange, because that means I have a partial beam of that one slit and a steel from the other slit and the wings to each other and they add up to zero, that was the picture of wave and now I am doing that with matter waves, but matter is sign rays, how can you draw two sign rays? sandblast and another sandblast twice as much sand, yes, and yet these nanoparticles or elementary particles interfere, they show a wave character and in quantum physics this is called dualism of wave signs, yes, so it is a discovery experimental and nowyou can figure it out so much.

Anyway, there is the mathematical apparatus, quantum physics, which describes it with complete precision, but you can't understand it in itself because what is a sign? And now there are more experiments than experimenters did 100 years ago in 80 years. They came up with the idea a while ago. Okay, so I have two parts of the two columns and now I reduce the intensity of my drawing beam to the point that there is only one electron moving at a time, then the electron would have to interfere with itself to come out in a different pattern because only one electron is moving at any given time so there is one coming every second okay so you have to wait quite a while until enough electrons have returned here so somehow I have to have a dark light there or many electrons a few electrons how to do it right and lo and behold the result is that a striped pattern appears again, so each electron that hits the screen gives a single flash of light, then as befits particles, one that arrives flashes like this and I just add up the flashes and then I find that right in the middle there are many flashes to the right and less to the left and then these stripes with many, many or few electrons and that even at intensities in the that I can rule out that two electrons can interfere in any way because only one is always in motion.

Is that possible because the interpretation in quantum physics is that a particle is not a particle? sign at all, a small ball but an extended wave, the pond is the wave if I prepare this beam of particles in the way necessary for this experiment, it spreads and the joke is that if I had a number of electrons on the way at a time determined then this electron has to pass through slits at the same time, an electron passes through both slits and that is a typical contradiction or something like that that you cannot imagine, that is a signal that can pass through two slits, that is unimaginable.

And yet, so it is with this experiment and now it will go further and that is where it will be. Until now it was not information at all. Now let's start with the information. Now I can. I'll try to figure out which slit this electron passes through and then I'll modify the experiment a little bit and now I'll follow an experiment from Vienna by Anton Zeilinger, who won the Nobel Prize in 2022 this year for his work exactly in this area of ​​physics and I. He thought it was really cool, this recognition was really a breakthrough into the unknown, so he modified the experiment and carried it out with nanoparticles, for example C60, the nanofootball, yeah, and you can heat them up and then they glow and If they glow then I can follow them, so green is an exaggeration.

They have emitted some photons but in principle it could follow the path and then the interference pattern disappears. Yeah, that's a little strange, because if so, it means that they. are, so that's it after the bridge, so the wavelength remains the same, there's just a little bit warmer water, nothing actually keeps flying the same path, and yet the interference pattern disappears and You can do this in many different ways in different types of As soon as you could know where the electrons are or how they behave, these ghostly properties disappear, so they are not local. This is called ghostly non-local or, according to Einstein, spit-like properties of this nanoworld.

If you look, so to speak, yes, if you can look, they need an interaction. So in the case of something, they just glow, but you can also imagine many other things, then this saliva appearance disappears and the particles that are observed. suddenly they behave completely normally like signs and then there are two lines here like shadows cast by them. In both columns it is a bit strange and now the experimenters have taken it even further and made the interactions weaker and weaker and it is that way as soon as they could. I know in principle and as an experimenter you can also keep your eyes closed and not look at it, yes, as soon as you can know it, the interference pattern disappears and the physics is actually so advanced that I say it is about information and transfer of information from the system in this case, so the particles fly into the environment in different environments or very large universes spoken differently at the time the universe will forgive me for this somewhat provocative formulation at the time the universe might know where is the sign for a long time the interference pattern disappears for you, of course it needs an interaction in some way, how should I do it a little with someone?

So I said blooming, for example, the appearance of photons, but you can always weaken this interaction and also exchange it. As with information, the bearer does not matter. I can use different sources of information, the particles themselves, according to everything we know, were not disturbed by forces and yet they disappear. The waves bind the electronic cord from this extended state. a point where it is dangerous and flies like a point like a sign along a road, this is also called the collapse of the world function through people looking and not looking through it, so just like with information, it is not necessary to have consciousness, not my life of being, but in this case it must be possible for the universe or at least the environment of the experiment to discover where the symbol has flown at the moment when the ghostly behavior disappears the dikes they become a task called yes and that seems to be a transfer of information regardless of the carrier so how the information is transferred and that is really very very strange yes and I once said it like that when the universe is watching or could look, so it's not actually looking because the universe at least according to everything we know, it has no consciousness and I'm thinking about it now, I'll take a look or something, but as soon as there's a docking, the rest of the universe will disappear, these ghostly phenomena and our nanoparticles or the nano world behaves normally, normally the double slit experiment is a very basic experiment, then there is this famous Schrödinger's cat thought experiment that I don't want to explain now, at least that a cat in a completely closed box may be dead. and I live at the same time, not in the Wild West they always say that the perpetrator for me is dead or alive but this cat could be dead and if not and that also works for Kubitz they can be one at the same time or just one. or zero at the same time and normal with, of course, it can only be 1 or 0, but a quantum bit can be both at the same time, like the cat, but as soon as there is a coupling with the environment, the universe disappears and The quantum bit becomes normal and it's 1 or 0, so all of a sudden it goes through this measurement what state are you in because I'm going to take a look now, and all of a sudden it goes to one or zero and that's a collapse of a wave function in a normal state and it seems to you that I am always a little cautious but it really seems to me that it is a transfer of information because it is independent of the carrier and the real interaction, that is, what transfers the information from the system to the environment. , it can be as weak as you want, in any case this does not explain this clicking, yes and there is something like that that is what had actually previously explained information is actually what actually according to philosophy can only be in living beings conscious o If we go into biology, then it is life, but not outside of life, not in inanimate nature, but here in quantum physics, information seems to play a very serious role and that is completely inanimate nature.

It's very, very strange to think that in quantum physics there is very little information in the world. In inanimate nature, information can play a fundamental role. John Archibald Wheeler took this idea much further and put a lot of thought into these fundamental experiments in quantum physics. There is not only the double column experiment, but also some. others, a theoretical physicist from Princess who died in 2008, and he also has a photo of him, so there aren't many photos of him, it's a little blurry now, he has this motto condensed from these findings from these findings. of quantum physics, it's a little, please, information is the basis of everything and I want you to read me from the wonders of the physical world the idea that everything in the real musical physical world has a dangerous undertone.

In the original there is an immaterial source and the exposition and explanation is based on physical things, all physically real things, for example, our atoms, etc., and ourselves too. Information theories are of the form of vaccination, so they have their origin in information theory. In terms of information about you. , the basis is the information that this is a participatory university, not a university, but a universe. As we know it, what works according to common sense only arises through the connection with the environment and that is what he understands by the participatory universe. I think I have to make another video about this because it's a little crazy because it means that as a base we have information, yes, and that's something like spirit, yes, and then everything is connected, so it's a bit very strange and completely contradicts this idea that the universe is some kind of steam engine, no, that's the other extreme here.

So information would be the basis of beings, but that seems to be just that again, but these quantum experiments from the realm of quantum theory when you think about them you really get confused, yes, and there is someone else who really got confused and this year received the Nobel Prize for theoretical quantum physicist, also experimenter, also quantum physicist, both in theory and experiment, Anton Sallinger received the Nobel Prize this year. a few months ago here is a photo of him and yes, the photo comes from below, those are the sources and Mr. Zeilinger has also thought about fundamental experiments in quantum physics and there is a second experiment that I do not want to explain further. detail now, so we end up here in a course on quantum physics and that is the Stern Gerlach experiment and comes the Stern Gerlach experiment.

It is somehow quite strange that the spin axis of an electron can only have two states up or down, but it is a normal spin axis, like the Earth's spin axis, which at the moment points to the star polar, which in principle can point anywhere, yes, there is no guide, it just turns out that at some point they were like that, and by the way they are a little precise, but there are no laws of nature that determine in which direction this should point axis of rotation of a gyroscope or the earth and if there are free forces, that is not the case with the children's top because it is in the gravitational field so it precipitates but outside in the universe without forces the axis of rotation would simply point in one direction due to the conservation of angular momentum and ultimately the direction this top takes is completely irrelevant but with quantum signs not with quantum ponds, such elementary particles or yes, then it depends a little, in any case, for example, a half or a spider 1 sign that can this spider not play particles of the system, it has to be so definitely of the size of the angular momentum that is quantified the axis of rotation can only be down or down relative to one.

The measurement direction is, so you want to measure where you're looking where and then I have some reference direction for my sake, north-south and I look at the sign, how? rotates and normally it could rotate in all directions so where the pulse is points towards this axis of rotation but it always only points down or down and if I change the measurement direction from east to west I only get two directions towards down, so all the electrons point down or down or east to west horizontally left or right, so there are only two states i.e. directionIt is called quantization, it is extremely evil and it is completely crazy , yes, there are only two possibilities and others zahninger thinks that it has something to do with the information with the amount of information that an electron can carry, he thinks that the amount of information for the state of an electron, that is, a solitary electron that travels through the universe can only carry a little electrical information, electrons carry no information at all, very dead, no, and for what purpose, yes, and yet when I assume, it means that that is always in reality with the idea that the world is such a big computer and that the electron is somehow simulated by the computer through this gigantic universal computer, yes, and we think it's in the electrons, but it's actually a particle of information and that's just it can be down or down and not because the amount stored is not enough, point in some diagonal direction and that's what he says here, that means this elementary particle is just a bit of information, it just carries an image of information and if I use that as assumptions, then um portulade sleeps before we can. build all quantitative theory on an information theory and so on.

For example, the postulate that such a signinformation, so I have to dig a little deeper into this, it's just speculation again in the end, so I actually thanked my sponsors. I think I forgot this time, so there are people who, now that I'm retired, allow me to continue running this. YouTube channel. I can't do that alone and it's a huge amount of work and I have no idea what and they always give me a little bit. So the money is crowdfunding again and I would like to thank you for that, yeah, and I. I try very hard to introduce new aspects.

I often go against the spirit of the times. Yes, when it comes to energy and climate, I agree 100% with this global climate, but I just read these reports. , yes, and if you re-record these reports here in the video, there are many problems again and I think that now with my mind as the basis or the information as the basis of the universe, there are many problems again because I go against this materialistic spirit of the time, yeah, and then there's always a shit storm or something, it's a little tiring, but sorry, I think it's our job as scientists to open new perspectives, so you can hire me as a speaker.

If you are planning any company events and would like to hear something different than what you usually hear, my YouTube channel is the table of contents here and yes etc. and comments are welcome to this email, thank you very much for this time and see you next time