Jack Nasher kommt der Band auf die Schliche - TV total

Now my question comes to someone else who has been here before, author of several bestsellers, business psychologist, doctor of philosophy, lawyer and expert in deception of the senses and mind, wrote this book Hello, how are you and I'm glad that the last book was a book that you presented here because it was about negotiations, negotiation techniques, no longer my job is a professor of leadership organizations and in fact I mainly teach negotiation seminars, yes, and that is a little bit of that derivative effect that comes with That's a lot of useful advice, it didn't always work when I tried it but that's okay, yes, there usually were for most people, but they're not always half as good, are they?

What is the name of the new book and love? They call me and it's about how not only do I know if someone is lying or not, so there's a brief explanation of how lies can be exposed, if someone is, so there are just certain clues and how I get to the whole truth, it's say, what kind of questions all the time someone tells me everything I want to know, okay, it works, how does it work, so we can, now we have something prepared here, a little action, yeah, with the

band

, okay, three of whom I know dress up as garden gnomes.

We had musicians, one of them is very tall, but he knows a lot about the

band

's materials, which is what was happening, so we had him follow up beforehand one of the three before, yes, he exactly stole something, I know it's me, No one knows who but the thief, but success must follow. Yeah, I had my

jack

et, so that's over and I'm doing my seminars. My

jack

et was hanging in the wardrobe and one of them, so we have one of the. 3 who are allowed to access all the rows, who are allowed to access all the rows, they all spent a minute there and one of them just stole something, namely money from my wallet, and the question is now there, yes , that was the instruction that one of them should I also know who stole what, no one knows who stole it, so that means the other person only knows that I don't have it, but I also don't know who said that, which of the little ones said that and here no one, After all, no one knows, that's how it is, yes, yes, and if you can trust everyone, then in our gang, ladies and gentlemen, really trustworthy people, except one who brazenly stole money from me, I would almost say which can now be taken for a question technology yes, so let's try it, that's exactly what their face looks like, that would be very, very good if you have the values ​​and otherwise he is really standing, yes, you have to see something, we have a guitar, we already see signs.

So that means now let's say they want to expose that it's a relatively common situation, so maybe it's not that one of the garden gnomes pulled something out of the cloud, but rather that something escaped or a child ate something or whatever. , as his friends have done. until now, I stole it from my wallet. He knows it's true, but that's the problem or how are you? That's really a winner and that's often the problem is just saying yeah, what do I want to know? Now, under normal circumstances I would torture him, but hey, that's a method that also has to be there.

That is, of course, that is what I also explained in my work. It is also about torture, but of course it is practical, so waterboarding for everyday life is not seen not allowed is not allowed but does not work either, it must be said that there are no really valid findings. There are no good ideas through the following, but every beginner first thinks that I have to scare the other person in the positions, mistreat them with a solder. iron or whatever, but that works with an iron, yes, there is also a yes, so there are really strange means, it has been too 50 shades of gray because of course it does, but I have read Wikileaks and that's why I saw it sometime.

One point before we start, yes, so, but now I just want to try out some interview techniques. The first thing you have to do if I want to know the truth, I will start with the opening anja and it says, for example, like this: Now we will find out who of you has the money, we will get to the truth, it is very clear, so if you have nothing to see with that, we'll find out and who has the money, we can do that too. Does that mean opening? What do I do with that? I let the other person understand.

I will tell the truth in any case to the green one. It's about the truth and the good thing is what happens now, the culprit is now afraid of being exposed, but the. the innocent Now he is less afraid because he says to himself, it's okay, he can see if I'm telling the truth or not and the good is not there. My mother always said that I'm looking fancy or not. It's written. on my forehead What's happening? I'm afraid if I lie I was honest because I was relaxed at Spittal, that's the point, so the first thing I have to do is give the impression that I am absolutely sure that I will do it. find out who he is and now come the questions, the interview questions and I think I'm there so maybe it's natural talents but common sense is clouded for the most part or I've written something out of the hunt, he has the phrase up here it's just who to start with maybe let's start here yes you have the money no that's the direct approach quite banal actually yes but now the following negates both yes everyone says it's natural but the interesting thing is that it is often like that that the culprit has thought carefully about what he is saying and many times the culprits come to Alister there are three reasons why it wasn't firstly secondly thirdly if someone This is how you know it was probably because she thought carefully about what What was he saying or indirect lying is also very popular, that is, I already said that I have nothing to do with it because it is not a lie at all.

We always said back then that it was a lie, which means yes, save yourself a Lie because we want as few lies as possible. Well, yeah, and now number 22, we're just doing a little advertising. Now it's getting exciting, it's exciting, it was a little bit of hype and then we'll do it. Keep going so stay tuned if you want to know if the experiment works now we will solve the puzzle so jack

nasher

had a wallet in his jacket that was hanging in the dressing room three guys from our band the heart of the trade and the crisis are in There was only one person in the office he only had money in his wallet.

Now we're finding out who he was, so I asked him the question, exactly the direct question: Do you have more money? Now comes the comparison question. for hannah hanna right can halo you left the money number two is the second of has okay hello have you ever stolen something between the ages of 19 and 25 it's not okay the comparison is quite interesting yes because that's the one I'm asking something that has nothing What to do with the matter, now he says that he is the culprit, it is not a problem for him, he says yes or no, but it does not matter, he runs or he also says clearly who does not have that at some point. point no but and that's interesting because the innocent person's debt is the biggest dilemma here because the innocent person has no problem predicting that it wasn't me, but now he has a problem and think about it if now I say that I have already stolen something at some point, maybe you don't believe me that it wasn't me or what should I say now, that means now you are in a brief dilemma and you are hesitating here, while the culprit is relaxed because that is not worth a problem Or he stole something or he didn't, but the innocent person is the one who doubts the most here, that's not a but I don't want to give too much away, so number three, please, should you do it with the other three, yes, no, hello, that was a picture book hesitation that is almost suspicious.

It's almost played again, you have to say, but actually this is a so-called probing question, so you ask details about the crime and now the innocent person says it wasn't over and that's it. Thinking about what I should say now, oh, so call it, I don't know, yeah, and here it is, so it goes like this. I always have to think about it because now it's only three questions out of 15. So. I always have to think about how the guilty person would react, how they would react in a really innocent way, and then it's very, very rational after another and who is it now that has now that we have the audience vote, but I have to say that it is extremely difficult because now we have only asked one question to each one there was a commercial break so that is now very very very disappearing now so you have me natural talents yes but let's try again who thinks Krischan was a pianist here he was here on the brave bass he is Of course, there are very few who believe that it's Hannover right now, it's just that you hear it a little less on the drums.

Most of it revolves around the plot, it's interesting, they also heard it, so I did it, he was from the beginning alone because I looked at the faces because I noticed, but on the drums they made an effort and there is no expression on their faces , Yeah. Nothing to reveal, yes that's good, but unfortunately common sense, which here is true to many things and it doesn't work that way, you really have to learn it and I have to say it's like who wants to be a millionaire, so the joker from The hearing isn't that bad, you know because I don't do it.

I don't know, but I can also bring the money from the pointy cap or from where he is actually registered. All right, interesting, interesting, yes, interesting, and there we would be. It would be very easy for the courts to always find out who the thief is. It's easy to take the audience with you all the time, yes, but that's not a recognized method, after that you can't miss any important part, unfortunately not yet, if maybe you can work for it, ok, thank you very much for us, that would be really interesting because you want to know more about him, can this good care here and love is what Jack Nasher says, thank you very much for that.