BACK 2 BAM BUILDERS OF THE ANCIENT MYSTERIES - Full movie 4K documentary (Civilization, History)

The foreigner Gontier came to Egypt with us for the first time in 2007. Geologist and ethnominologist at the Loma Museum in Paris, his mission is to identify the rocks used by the

ancient

Egyptians. That was where it all began for him. Together we visited some of the most beautiful. archaeological sites in the world where we discover construction peculiarities that generally accepted hypotheses cannot explain in March 2016 he agreed to accompany us again when we filmed Builders of the Ancient Mysteries, this time he requested more precise measuring equipment exactly what was needed to quantify our observations are strange if we think about

history

about certain periods and the generally accepted hypotheses none of them explain the precision that we measure that is what you will see in this

documentary

that is how and why we proceeded with the aim of verifying what our intuition suggested that we are independent research team whose members come from diverse

back

grounds scientists technical engineers architects stonemasons and passionate researchers If our approach confuses or bothers certain historians that is to be expected because our procedure is different we decided to distance ourselves a little from the models imposed by

history

because we noticed that their Memory is not always reliable and the worst thing is that it can influence our perspective, let's take the Great Pyramid as an example, our perception will be different based on what we think we see instead of things that appear like that or something like that, it's all a question.

From a foreign perspective let's start with what history tells us about our species based on recent discoveries. The first Homo sapiens appeared 300,000 years ago, living as hunters, gatherers, and small nomadic tribes for 290,000 years before first settling and occupying

ancient

Sumeria. Iraq approximately six to seven thousand years ago at the beginning of

civilization

in this timeline, the Egyptians began building pyramids about 3,500 years later and there is obviously no room left in these states for an ancient advanced

civilization

that would have been the origin of our own. The first thing that becomes evident to the impartial observer is that there is a huge contrast between certain gigantic monuments and the methods supposedly used to build them, since these sites date

back

to a time when we only had primitive technology, so it is possible achieving them with primitive technology that is the general approach that archeology uses on this topic which seems normal when we consider the process of technological advances that mark our history from the invention of the wheel thousands of years ago to nanotechnologies but as the late Jean said Louis Bostell and experienced stonemason. foreigner this approach is problematic it influences our vision and prevents us from thinking freely the

builders

did not leave us any explanation of their methods we are not sure of the dating of the structures and we still do not know how they were built the generally accepted hypotheses is that these monuments were achieved by using primitive technologies and a large workforce over a very long period of time using this historically driven model of progress, why immediately discard all other hypotheses by declaring them impossible, for example the use of machine tools in the Ancient Egypt?

It is seen as absurd because everyone knows that the Egyptians did not have machine tools to go further, how do we know that? because history says so, based on what, based on the fact that we have not found machines, representations of parts or even texts that mention machines, we could answer that There are no records of the construction of these ancient sites, but they still exist. We might also wonder what such tools would have had to be made of to last thousands of years. We could then observe that we have found strange objects and representations of objects. that were misunderstood or considered ritual or religious elements due to their strangeness, as for the texts, we believe that many are not studied in the correct way, that story, in fact, is told in detail in the advertisement for the text of construction, but all this does not prove anything any way you look at it because the absence of evidence is not the proof of absence.

Are we really sure that we have made a breakthrough in terms of how we understand ancient ways of thinking? Instead of speculating, we have decided to investigate what we have in front of us. We have decided to study the Monuments with the best instruments at our disposal to make them speak because at first on paper everything seemed improbable because our history guides our gaze by prohibiting this type of association of different Places. from different areas arguing for a common origin, but any link between these two sites is considered totally impossible due to their historical, political and religious context, which is precisely what some people criticize us for neglecting, more precisely, we are criticized for Don't accept what history says about History says that the Valley Temple was built approximately 2500 years BC and Machu Picchu approximately 1400 CE, of course four thousand years separate these two sites.

A single source for this technology seems strictly impossible, so where do these dates come from? Those that interest us most come from elements found nearby or from inscriptions, since it is almost impossible to date the carving of a stone. We date bones or other organic matter or known objects found at the sites. Humans have the unfortunate habit of always rebuilding in the same place. This complicates investigation since it is impossible to go deeper without damaging the sites. What percentage of the actual total number of existing objects is represented by those we have found, we do not know, so what remains once again, what we have found in Machu Picchu we can clearly distinguish two Styles this and this a fact that some people explain in this way is archeology says that this site would have been active only for a century very damaged in some areas it would have withstood earthquakes that would have destroyed or damaged blocks of the Sacred structures that However, they were not restored identically.

How can we explain this? Let's dare to ask, what if this part of Machu Picchu is much older than the rest of the constructions that date back to the 15th century? How can we know that thanks to new technologies and not destructive methods that are increasingly powerful and reveal what is still buried under the crosshairs because as we have shown in previous films the same difference in styles is observed. In other parts of the planet we can observe this same phenomenon of the use of different Technologies in numerous ancient places. The archeology of the sites explains this by the fact that such differences are inherent to Homo sapiens.

Everywhere there were people who did the same things, including using stone blocks weighing several dozen tons and the strange bags depicted at Gobekli Tepe Sumer and in Peru. Populations would have started with the most complicated and long-lasting method, assembling complex-shaped stone blocks without cement held together by nothing more than the precision with which they were cut, then this technology was slowly lost and people ended up building easier and more durable shapes. less durable. Egypt as a Whole seems to go against the idea of ​​linear progress. Remember the words of American engineer Chris Dunn and then you follow the progress of that civilization for 3000 years and end up using the same tools they started with.

It makes no sense that the paradox is difficult to explain. It's a good question: either humans at different times in history always end up losing their consciousness or the same cause has produced the same effects everywhere, but we can't see that because of dating. The dating of these sites is done using inscriptions found when available, for example, the Sakara sarapam dates back to the 18th Egyptian Dynasty, around 1500 BC. C., its 22 granite tanks contain mummies of foreign sacred bulls. This tank is the only one with hieroglyphic carvings on the outside, but when you look closer, the work is very inaccurate and poorly done, it is difficult to conceive that the same people who created these tanks with such care could be satisfied with such flimsy engravings, However, these engravings have determined the dating and function of these tanks.

Let's take a second example of inscription dating from the Barabar and Nagarjuni caves in India, where even more than in the sarapeam the level of precision is astonishing, again we are not aware of any archive or text that describes how this was achieved. Based on this simple and clumsy inscription, the carving of these caves is attributed to King Ashoka's grandson. It is said that for political reasons he gave this place to the members of a sect so that they could take refuge from the monsoon rains. This inscription alone defined the entire historical context, both political and religious, of these amazing caves that is why they have been classified as shelters created with primitive tools at this point everyone knows that it could not be otherwise the context determines the tools and period techniques which may be the reason why these caves have not really been studied and are mostly unknown in the Western world in this particular case we can wonder about the validity of the dating based on inscriptions since in one of the caves there are inscriptions from a more recent period, this one dating back to the 5th or 6th century AD, this also dates from around the same years, showing that throughout time people have not hesitated to write on walls, which which is probably the case with the first registration.

These caves are unique because they were chiseled out of a rock as hard as granite. History tells us that these workers were able to achieve it on their first attempt. These five rectangular chambers were cut with extreme precision. They are completely symmetrical with walls as smooth as strange glass. After achieving this no one was able to do it. Doing it again, everything produced in the following centuries, no matter how spectacular, never matched the unique precision of these caves, but we had to scan them in 3D to capture this precision that contradicts the vague idea we have of how they were made to To come up with the idea of ​​scanning them, you must first think that our history may be different from what we believe, which is a step we easily take, since sarapam and barabar show us that the History not only influences our judgment, but also has a memory is short, but in its defense, normal knowledge has such strong power that it is the chosen goal of conquerors throughout history.

In that sense, as revealed by author Selby and Steinmetz, the Persians burned Egyptian temples and writings in 527 BC. C. and 40 years later. in 490 BC. C. they burned many Greek writings. The wars led to more wars and the need for revenge in Persepolis, in what is now Iran. In 330 BC C., the Greeks led by Alexander the Great destroyed 12,000 written volumes produced by the Magi a century later, in the year 14 BC. Emperor Kinshi Wan, who inherited one of the Seven Kingdoms of China, subdued the other six and ordered the destruction of all his books, including some of Confucius, in 146 BC.

C., the Romans entered the scene and destroyed 500,000 Phoenician scrolls in Carthage and then, in 52 BC. C., Julius Caesar. He ordered the destruction of all Druid College books a little later, around 250 AD. It is said that the Great Library of Paragamon was destroyed by Christian fundamentalists, but it should be known that Mark Antony already gave it to Cleopatra in the year 41 BC. 200,000 books from that library in the year 270 AD, the Romans burned the famous Library of Alexandria that contained between 400,000 and 700,000 books, according to sources, and to conclude this dark period for the memory of knowledge in the year 391, Theophilus destroyed what It is said that the Library of Alexandria still contained 42,000 books at that time.

These events covering only a short historical period allow us to understand why we have so little information about antiquity if the Antikythera Mechanism had not been miraculously discovered in an ancient shipwreck at the beginning of the 19th century. 20th century no one would have known it existed, many centuries passed before something similar was created again. Not only had history forgotten its existence, it categorized the texts describing it by Greek authors as fiction and this was only two thousand years, but if it reminds us that history is quickly forgotten, it also shows us that objects do not last.

Beyond this achievement, it is the conceptualization that precedes it that makes engineers like Matías Bhute Marvel what makes the mechanism extraordinary and even more incomprehensible is the fact that we can forget. the existence of this object as far as oblivion is concerned can be even worse history forgot the beginning of sedentary life like parents forget the first steps of their own children this crucial moment marks the beginning of our civilization when some of our ancestors hunter-gatherers decided to settle down and become farmers who for a time are history located seven or eight thousand years agoIn Sumer, the site of Gobeckley Tepe buried nearly 12,000 years ago teaches us a lesson through its very existence and a totally anachronistic technological level.

This chronology is a discovery that could make us consider more seriously this hypothesis of an ancient civilization that disappeared in a cataclysm. at the end of the driest period about 13,000 years ago, as seen in our previous films. This is strange, but for about 30 years. Researchers have noticed that something was not right in all these important sites of our past, we were surprised by the fluid lines, the purity and precision of the achievements that always give us the impression of an easy and well-mastered craft, which makes us believe that these

builders

could achieve it. Whatever the challenge, foreign claims that ancient people were irrational according to their beliefs, as soon as we don't understand something we think it's because it's spiritual or religious, preventing us from properly understanding these constructs throughout of the years. accustomed to recognizing strange details on sites, it seemed perfectly normal to follow our intuition and do something no one else had done before to run the rifometer on the Pumapunku news blocks.

This moment we are about to reveal contains the essence of our focus on the path. We look at what our eyes give us when we see the foreigner foreigner the tiwanaku plateau in Bolivia at an altitude of 4 000 meters is Eric always tries to explain the work with ancient stone cutting techniques that are the simplest after observing in his first round foreign that is the classic scraping technique, but this time we don't just rely on visual observation. Eric requested that we bring a rugometer. This is necessary to quantify the foreign accuracy at this time again. Eric, like many archaeologists, seems to have confidence in himself, he says that many feet, that's when we reach the tipping point the machine reveals a very particular surface is absorbed by his measurements he doesn't immediately realize the implications if possible achieve it using abrasive techniques it becomes harder on the inner sides of the block where they are just as soft as the outer sides and with very precise angles, it is imaginable so much imagination while we were filming in Pumapunku someone from our team made another discovery, the H blocks have exactly one meter high.

Two German archaeologists noticed the same fact in 1992, but it went completely unnoticed with the help of a rangefinder using a laser to measure. Eric measured different parts of the blocks. We are going to measure another block that is in perfect condition but somewhat inaccessible. Eric is a bit embarrassed. No. Can you explain it? Doubt, search for words and suddenly say foreign, foreign. The problem is not only to achieve such flat surfaces even at the angles, but also that the dimensions are identical from one block to another. um strange, only vague ideas were made resulting from visual observations like those Eric made on the first day with the raphometer and the rangefinder even While he admits that it is a huge job, Eric mentions copper tools and abrasive stones, but after measuring all sizes and surfaces, their perspective is totally different.

These measurements showed us something we had not noticed. The standardized production of complex shapes carved from andesite, a rock that is as hard as tempered steel and with a surface as flat as modern concrete, given these results, must have been done with more than just copper and abrasive tools. He hesitates to talk about it. Questioning current standard assumptions is a difficult pill to swallow. outputs um pukwa let's talk about the metric system again, but before that, why are we the first to be so interested in the details of these blocks? Probably because history makes it useless.

We don't know how these blocks were made, but we are sure. It was with primitive tools that is a constant that makes this situation almost grotesque. How could we formulate a hypothesis about the way the rocks were cut based on partial information? These details are so important that once known they are precisely what make Eric change his mind and not measuring backwards is one thing but being able to explain how this was achieved is another. To better understand the difficulties of carving rocks you must know their level of hardness. It's a harder rock it can scratch a softer one but don't work the other way around if you take granite or endocytes which are at hardness level 7.

Copper is at 3 and you can't scratch or pierce them. Strangers on the hardness scale almost the same level as the tempered steel that is necessary to carve it. otherwise you have to braid it and that is exactly the problem that Eric faces when the same dimensions are repeated from one block to another. Contrary to what some say, we are never opposed to the idea that it is possible to cut hard rock with a copper blade and abrasive. The question is not whether or not it is possible to cut hard rock, but rather whether or not it is possible to cut all sides of a multi-ton block with such precision is the racing mode is the cvcc basalt are images of imagination if there is a big gap between observation and rare hypotheses that were never actually tested, but as the History says so, it must have been made with primitive tools like these or, more precisely, foreign ones.

To build, you need a model that is even more true with the Great Pyramid given its size, even if Egyptology long claimed that it was not here like in Pumapunku, if your eyes are not trained to see Precision, if you follow the reconstitution of the workers at the time the pyramids were built, you can easily confirm this. The idea that with thousands of dedicated workers it could be accomplished in 20 to 25 years by simply stacking rocks on top of each other with no guarantee that they will stay in place, that doesn't work for the construction of the Great Pyramid.

Remember this. An earlier

movie

article said it would take 80 trucks a day, five days a week for 12 years, just to fill a quarry with a volume of stone comparable to that of the Great Pyramid. Khufu or his cenotaph built over 25 years during the Fourth Dynasty, although no one seems to agree on when his reign began or how long it lasted. The tomb or cenotaph is a bit confusing, so let's specify that a tomb contains a body, where a cenotaph is a kind of Monument to the Bodiless Dead. This hesitation comes from the fact that no actual body was ever found in the Great Pyramid nor in any pyramid of the first dynasties what some Egyptologists explain as looting while for others it is only symbolic monuments remember this ancient controversy reported by Pliny the Elder mentioned in the previous films to the 12 authors who did not agree on the function of these pyramids.

History only remembers the writings of the Greek Herodotus, considered the father of History, who said for the first time two thousand years after the supposed date of its construction. the Great Pyramid was the tomb of Cheops today Egyptology is distancing itself from this Theory but unfortunately none of the other 11 writings remain this is another reminder that history is based on sources and in this case they no longer exist the result is a biased view based on the thinking of these ancient authors, an assumption that the Great Pyramid was always thought to be a tomb, but which is now questioned by several researchers based on older compiled writings.

Historian Abu Saliman al-Kabi reports that in the past scientists postulated four possible functions for the Pyramids of Giza astronomical observation tombs storage of goods and knowledge or shelters against disasters explains that Muslim scholars only consider two functions astronomical observation and repositories of knowledge The scholar al-sayudi attributes them to a very remote past, arguing that if they were built in our times, the knowledge necessary for their construction would still be known to man, since classical Muslim historians in general the origins of Egyptian civilization go back a long way. Further back in time than Western historians claim, if we do not have Egyptian writings explaining the use of the pyramids and Herodotus' claims are erroneous, on what basis can we conclude that the Great Pyramid was the tomb of Khufu? that hypothesis is increasingly difficult to maintain first the name Khufu is written inside the Great Pyramid on the blocks within an enclosed space above the pharaoh's chamber the inscriptions are poorly inscribed with red ink and we have not yet been able to see them up close exists a controversy over its authenticity the only way to resolve it would be to date the organic material within the ink made by German archaeologists from the University of Dresden that in 2013 but not legally so the Egyptology community rejected the results even in 2013 the team by Pierre Talay found the mirror papyrus the logbook of a foreman in the kofu era that describes the process of transporting limestone from the Tura quarry to Giza This very particular limestone dancer and finer than limestone brown found in the center of the Great Pyramid was used in its outer cladding and also in the middle pyramid, as well as in other parts of the site objectively, even if the name of Khufu is mentioned in the Papyrus.

As with the red inscriptions, nothing proves whether it is a tomb or not. What is the importance of that question? If it is a tomb, it must have been built during the reign of Khufu in just 20 or 25 years and that prevents us from looking further. the function of a tomb without considering any of its particularities because as said above you do not look at a tomb and an object that has an unknown function in the same way historically speaking the Great Pyramid is part of an ongoing bidding war since the time Jose's. step pyramid where each pharaoh would surpass the size and complexity of his predecessors to demonstrate his power, which interestingly stops with Khufu, as Caffrey's pyramid is smaller than the Great Pyramid and Mankara's pyramid is even smaller if there is still an argument for it.

Coffrey's pyramid was built higher up on the plateau, making it appear taller. It becomes more difficult to defend the small one, but that is not the only contradiction. The first Egyptian pyramid would be the stepped pyramid of Joseph, then come the flat-sided ones, the Pyramid of May Doom. The Bent Pyramid and the Red Pyramid then come the three of Giza, then only the smaller pyramids are built with bricks, almost all collapsed again, we see a pattern where the oldest constructions are the largest and most durable even though we have studied scientifically the Great Pyramid for more than 200 years we still do not know how it was built the image of thousands of workers in loincloths under the scorching sun maneuvering thousands of blocks with ropes and wooden sludge is deeply ingrained in our minds ETS for the megalomaniac Khufu presented as An enthusiastic pyramid builder, all we have is a small statue three inches high, almost as if it has been deliberately erased from history.

Who can believe that such a work could have been organized without writings regarding construction works? Khufu is overshadowed by his father Snefru, who built it. three huge pyramids, May Doom, the gang pyramid and the Red Pyramid. It was long believed that the Pyramid of Doom belonged to King Huni, who died before the completion of its construction and that his son Sneferu finished it before building the curved and Red Pyramid, but it now appears that Sneferu receives credit for the works. three, we do not know if they were built simultaneously or successively, but all combined, according to estimates by archaeologists, added up to about 3.5 million tons of stone blocks during a reign of 25 years, which represents 390 blocks per day every day.

What catches our attention is the obvious question if the pyramids are tombs why snefaru needed several rushes to build the largest tomb several tombs for the same king these hypotheses are sometimes difficult to defend without a large The wooden fragments of the Great Pyramids found by astronomer Piazzi Smith during the previous century have been dated to 3341 and 3094 BC. C., which delayed the dating previously accepted by Egyptology by more than 500 years, which shows how little We know that we also wonder why three of these pyramids are slightly octagonal. The Red Pyramid, the Great Pyramid and the small pyramid, but strangely not the medium pyramid.

No one mentions this except in these terms. In reality, this is impossible because we would notice cracks everywhere. It also means that the other pyramids are octagonal for the same reasons, this is not insignificant, it means that they had to alter 90 centimeters at the base of the Great Pyramid, which at 115 meters in both directions means moving each block less than half a degree and repeat that on each side and the higher you go the smaller the angle becomes, as if it wasn't hard enough to stack 203 layers of different heights into a single pyramid, making it even harder with cardinal alignmentsprecise, you should not confuse the two methods of pointing.

North, which can be achieved at night by aligning a rope with a star or at the equinoxes by observing the shadows with the orientation of this entire building that requires constant checks to achieve only a small minimum error of 0.05 degrees for a building so large that It's nothing to summarize. Approximately 4,500 years ago, people excavated a 30-meter-deep underground chamber in the bedrock of a plateau, on top of which a 230-meter side plaza was built with only a two-centimeter variation, where 140 meters were stacked. of blocks using 2 million limestone blocks of an average weight of 1.5 tons each in 203 layers of different heights forming an eight-sided pyramid

full

y centered and aligned with the four cardinal points with modern precision this underground chamber is now connected to a narrow room approximately one meter high by one meter wide and 100 meters long at an angle of exactly 26 degrees that connects with another equally narrow room leading to a chamber 50 meters long 8.5 meters tall the most spectacular chamber of this pyramid this chamber leads to an empty room on one side with an empty statue in each of which nothing was ever found approximately in the middle of the room but perfectly aligned with the central axis of the pyramid , the top of this chamber leads to an anti-chamber that has a security system that is totally useless with another narrow room leading to a chamber made of granite blocks weighing between 12 and 70 tons on the roof that were transported from 900 kilometers away to build a double square-shaped room, precisely horizontal and vertical, crossed by two narrow tunnels about 40 meters long where the only object is located. the present is a tank where no mummy was ever found all this to satisfy the megalomania of a king made in 20 to 25 years by 2000 workers with the help of peasants four months a year based on these observations it seems rational and safer to admit that the history I simply forgot how and why this pyramid was built because absolutely nothing proves that this pyramid is a tomb, but if the Great Pyramid is not a tomb what is it first is a geometric object with specific proportions pi and the golden ratio for example this Dimension Divided by this gives us pi the visible surface of the Great Pyramid the four sides divided by the invisible surface or the base gives us the golden ratio, the visible height divided by pi is equal to the total height multiplied by the golden ratio squared, etc., but for Egyptology, since the Egyptians did not know these numbers, their mere presence is an accident, so you can imagine that bringing up the subway in this context is so surprising that it is immediately rejected with the justification that if you work With numbers you will always find what you want, a boat.

This point mentioned in the previous

movie

s might be the most problematic because everyone knows it. The Egyptians didn't know anything about metric measurements, are we really sure of course? first because the Egyptians measured in cubits second because the meter was invented in 1795, thousands of years after the Great Pyramid, if the meter was not already determined by our ancestors long before our time, then this is an extraordinary coincidence close from the year 2500 BC. C., using a measurement system called The Royal Qubit which is supposed to be the measurement from the cubit to the fingertips of a king, the Egyptians built the tallest ancient stone building, 440 cubits wide, space additional and 280 cubits high.

As we mentioned previously, we noticed the presence of these two numbers that the Egyptians should not have known. 3,500 years later in France, the builders of churches, cathedrals and castles used the Keen as a measurement system of five units, five different units that are organized around the golden ratio. whose sizes can vary from one region to another French royalty eventually imposed a single measurement the medieval royal king it turns out that the medieval Royal Cubit that is part of the Keen is exactly the same length as the Royal Cubit used for the Great Pyramid 3500 years earlier let's continue This clue towards the end of the 17th century the great Isaac Newton who demonstrated the existence of gravity from the relationship between the dimensions of the Great Pyramid and the Earth 1781 in a book dedicated to the King of France the mathematician Alexis Jean-Pierre Pokton also raises a link between the dimensions of the Great Pyramid and the Earth that has not yet been precisely measured 1795 the meter is invented its value is established in one complete rotation of the earth divided by 40 million to achieve that The distance between Dunkirk and Barcelona was measured precisely, which gave us the value of the meter as we know it, a value so specific that it will still take nearly two more centuries to realize that, by chance, the meter illuminates certain enigmatic instructions on our planet.

Built centuries and sometimes millennia earlier, although they govern the mathematical relationships between the dimensions of the Great Pyramid, these two numbers were supposedly unknown to its builders and then, thousands of years later, French royalty established the use of the same qubit that was used in the Great Pyramid. The coincidence But it doesn't end there, the first coincidence takes place in France, where the actual section linked to the medieval qubit measures exactly 20 centimeters, five sections equal exactly one meter, which seems meaningless, but apparently miraculously this connects these two systems of measurement and leads us to a second coincidence the medieval qubit measures 0.5235 meters 1 6 of Pi the third coincidence occurs in Egypt just as the medieval Royal Cobit has the same length as the cubits used in the Great Pyramid which is one sixth of the pie in meters with the value attributed to a meter certain dimensional proportions of the Great Pyramid give us pi and the golden ratio directly legible in meters thousands of years before the meter was defined the fourth coincidence occurs this time in Bolivia with again the value attributed to one meter eight blocks in the shape of The pre-incident of Pumapunku is exactly one meter long and one meter high with other measurements that are a proportion of whole numbers of one meter.

The fifth coincidence is an Easter Island related to the Giza Plateau and many other enigmatic sites of the past in the great circle. where once again due to the value given to the meter the distance between Easter Island and Giza is 10,000 times the golden ratio in kilometers 100 times the meters Pion 10 times the meters Pion 10,000 times the golden ratio in kilometers if the size of If the Earth were divided by any number other than 40 million, none of this would have ever existed, so what some people may still ask to determine the meter, is it necessary to have measured the Earth, who was able to do that ago? so long.

If all these coincidences are put together, the result is obtained. the most enigmatic tomb ever built on the planet if some people stick to the hypotheses of workers armed with wooden tools, ropes and miraculous coincidences, we have chosen not to believe anything convinced that science will recognize science, we decided to use the latest technology to especially verify our intuition. when far, far away from Egypt, the choice of meter produces a sixth coincidence this time in India in the Sudama cave at the site of Barbara its dome is six meters in diameter with a segment of a sphere of 3 meters radius with its center is one meter from the ground, all this because in 1795 we decided to invent the meter and gave it a specific value that thousands of years later will shed new light on ancient engineering masterpieces of which we have no documentation or memory since they were created. transmitted the real qubit.

Why not the meter? Maybe miracles exist, but when they come together in rocks that are so hard with such precision, it is no longer magic, it is science. In the previous film we presented the results of 3D scans that revealed high-precision symmetry, but at that time we had not yet measured this precision, at the end of February 2020 we filmed the

full

report of the analysis of the scans carried out by an engineer from the AGP company and then we returned to Barrabar in March to check what we had missed here again, it all started. With a gut feeling when we first visited these caves, having noticed a big gap between what had been published about these caves and our own observations, we decided to go back and scan them with 3D glasses.

Without measurements, without a trained eye, we use precision and knowledge. about how granite is carved, you could completely miss what we found to check a hunch, it's quite expensive, especially when you're talking about 3D scans far from home, but it was worth it, the results far exceeded our expectations. Here is the 3D scan of Gobika Cave. and the Nagarjuni site in India was not created by software, it is the real cave recomposed by millions of projected points using rotating lasers to scan the walls, as we showed in the previous movie, the side walls of this cave are not vertical but very slightly inclined in less than three degrees thanks to this study we now know that the angle of inclination changes by three tenths of a degree along a stretch of 8.1 meters what we had overlooked before is that they are slightly curved um the curvature has 7.5 centimeters deep, this cave is actually only made up of curves, a fact that was not recorded in any archaeological document, we were not able to see it with the naked eye and that is why we checked it again in March 2020. to measure the level of symmetry announced at the end of the last movie The AGB company cut this scan lengthwise and then superimposed the right segment on the left and vice versa the result is surprising 62 of the 44 million points that make up this scan are almost in the same place a characteristic remarkable um let's not give up bush cutting such a large and complex volume in granite with such precise symmetry seems impossible this degree of precision was part of the technical specifications decided before even starting the work our symmetrically polished mirror-like walls necessary to protect us of monsoons the idea is problematic We found the same degree of precision in each of these caves.

We will talk about this in more detail in the next movie. We needed a 3D scan to discover what we couldn't see with our simple measurements and Naked Eyes makes us wonder. What did the builders use to obtain and verify this degree of precision? We find the same precision all over the planet where we normally shouldn't. So how do we wrap this decorative element? Tomb Monsoon shelter. That's what history tells us today. Yes, history has marked. our minds with the idea that touching it is sacrilege and can provoke extreme reactions from certain historians, but if you needed to build a pyramid or a huge wall, would you call a technician or a historian?

It all started with the intuition that our current civilization It is not the first time that Homo sapiens has a 300,000-year-old intuition that all the common factors of these archaeological sites could be explained by something more than mere coincidence. A false assumption that prevents us from questioning anything. Why not consider this explanation as a transmission of knowledge? to our ancestors who were still hunter-gatherers by the survivors of an ancient civilization who might have been perceived as gods, wouldn't an evolved science be perceived as magical in the eyes of those who know nothing about it? How does a real hunter-gatherer do it? react when you see what modern technology allows us to achieve the same intuition that our history is wrong in assuming that Civilization is only 10,000 years old, this involves viewing history through the prism of War as if Humanity were essentially evil and the inevitable war.

The evidence supports the view that we have lost an entire civilization from our historical record. We are a species with amnesia, but where do we go from there in today's complicated modern Western reality? Some people wonder what positive value all this could bring to our lives besides satisfying us. curiosity when filling in the blank spaces of our history the answer is that our history questions our future and the world we are going to leave to our children we are constantly innovating a society that thinks that everything was always less advanced in the past after all our research We We find ourselves imagining a past much more developed than previously thought, produced according to the stories of centuries and millennia passed by a Humanity that has become amnesiac.

Our elders have a lot to teach us. They were able to build monumental elements that have survived through the ages as a badge of honor for our species, yes, humanity was once capable of all that because of its beauty, but perhaps even more so, now we will carefully follow other clues, such as energy production to achieve these sites, areIt needed energy and in large quantities. Beyond human or animal muscle strength, leadership in conducting research using sound frequencies also seems promising. We are currently working on all the data collected in barbar. We have yet to precisely quantify what we just briefly mentioned thanks to our collaborative research team constantly expanding their technical skills our work continues we will be back soon to share all of this with you for a better understanding of the achievements of these ancient forgotten builders foreign foreigner foreign