YTread Logo
YTread Logo

Alte Sowjet-Systeme im Einsatz - Kujat: "Russland hält strategisches Potenzial zurück" | ntv

Mar 06, 2024
Russia bombs Ukraine every day and is now supposed to use cruise missiles that were actually built for nuclear weapons. Mr. Kujat, is this a sign that the Russians are slowly running out of ammunition or does it mean that they still have plenty in reserve? Are there stocks? Now just be inventive about how you can use all of this. These systems are obsolete. Now there are many new ones and the inventory of these old cruise missiles is huge, thousands. I don't remember the number. It comes to mind, but there are a few thousand that Russia had in stock, by the way, Ukraine also had some after 1991, so now they are used practically as consumables.
alte sowjet systeme im einsatz   kujat russland h lt strategisches potenzial zur ck ntv
No warheads are needed, the effect is simply caused by the kinetic energy at the moment of impact and this is quite significant in this system as long as Russia lasts then the war continues, that is not the only reason why Russia is fighting this war. We also see that other systems are also used when bombing Ukraine's supply infrastructure. This is simply the consumption of obsolete systems. Russia still has a huge one. There are several modern systems of this type of cruise missiles and similar weapon systems, but of course Russia is also curbing their strategic potential. Russia sees itself as a strategic nuclear superpower on equal footing with the United States and of course tries to maintain this level and there is also what we are seeing at the moment: the fact is that the war is, so to speak , frozen, which means that Russia is in a position to continue producing weapons during the winter, as well as ammunition, and then, so to speak, attack with new forces in the spring.
alte sowjet systeme im einsatz   kujat russland h lt strategisches potenzial zur ck ntv

More Interesting Facts About,

alte sowjet systeme im einsatz kujat russland h lt strategisches potenzial zur ck ntv...

Some experts give the impression that Russia is in a weakened position, says Estonian Defense Minister, on the other hand, he has now said that after nine months of war the situation for Russia has not changed much and the air force is still as big as before. Of course, it has great potential power and has suffered considerable losses, but what our so-called experts explain to us is that Russia is almost at the end, so to speak, and Ukraine's victory is celebrated every day. That, of course, is nonsense. Russia has enormous potential. and it has a lot of potential.
alte sowjet systeme im einsatz   kujat russland h lt strategisches potenzial zur ck ntv
Of this potential, only a certain percentage was used in this war, which must be seen again and again, and Russia, of course, has enormous human resources that it can activate, but also important material capabilities, but the personnel losses on the Russian side they should remain relatively high. If you look at the region, at least what the British secret services are saying right now, that many soldiers are said to have died there, this is also the region in which Russia has been able to state quite well so far, what Do you know about this, like the Russian losses there?
alte sowjet systeme im einsatz   kujat russland h lt strategisches potenzial zur ck ntv
We don't want to know precise figures about the losses. Neither Russia nor Ukraine publish exact figures. Now we have heard from the United States that there are losses, namely deaths and wounded that can no longer be used, from the order of about 100,000 on both sides, you have to take into account what I just said, that Russia had a much better starting position than Ukraine, these figures should be correct and You have to say that again and again and it is also interesting, for Of course, always what is the ratio of wounded soldiers to dead soldiers. Normally it is assumed that they have a ratio of 1 to 3 to 1 to 4, which is a significant bloodshed on both.
It must be stressed again and again and it actually suggests that such a war cannot continue indefinitely as many of us want, but that you also have to think about whether it is not really time to take the opportunity to end this war at some point, but do you really think that Is there anyone who wants to negotiate with Russia or is interested in it? Do you believe that the Russians will then comply with what they can sign in the negotiations. Well, we have an example of Russia being willing to negotiate and make concessions to Ukraine, which even went so far that Russia was willing to make these concessions to withdraw its presence in Ukraine to the state of February 23, today we know that this partnership has this tangible agreement, which, by the way, was On the basis of a proposal from the Ukrainian government, which Russia then transformed into a draft agreement, so to speak, that this agreement did not occur because here the West intervened, that is, in the person of the then British Prime Minister Johnson.
Add that the current situation actually requires the two sides to return to the negotiating table. Of course, this had to be done by the United States first. The United States is putting pressure on Ukraine to actually declare this willingness and the head of American general materials. General Milli has asked for this several times a few days ago in these military days in which Ukraine cannot advance any further and, therefore, cannot win the war. To use it to end this war, let's talk about the issue of military aid. British Prime Minister Sunak has now said that he wants to maintain or even increase the amount of British aid.
What has Britain done for Ukraine so far? Basically, we are on the same beach as the Americans. Americans have more potential. that they can deliver, but I think Germany's achievements are also impressive because we specifically delivered what the Ukrainian forces needed most, for example our very powerful anti-aircraft systems, but also anti-tank weapons, but also many other smaller things that are not in public but of course they are extremely important for the Ukrainian armed forces, so I think we can make a name for ourselves and the Secretary General of NATO also praised our achievements a few days ago.
I also think that a competition, so to speak, of "Who delivers the most" does not make much sense. I am rather of the opinion that we should consider which weapons really serve the defense of Ukraine and which weapons the huge delivery of weapons poses the risk of escalation. The Americans are there. Very, very carefully, Ukraine has already repeatedly requested the delivery of long-distance packages that can be used to the heart of Russia, which external parties rejected again last week last because they fear an escalation of the war. I think we have to do both, on the one hand we have to deliver what helps Ukraine in defense, but on the other hand we also have to be very, very careful and now I will also mention the German strategists that keep appearing and demanding delivery.
Leopard 2 and Marder demand what also belongs to the category of what the Americans strictly reject. We should also stick to that and the second thing is that I think that little by little we should clarify the boundaries of our participation in this conflict, that our Basic Law contains in its preamble the commandment of peace for Germany, so we must participate in every war or support a belligerent party and we must always aim to achieve a peaceful solution in the end. That is the commandment of the Basic Law. I also hope that the Federal Government will comply with this.
Once the population makes clear what the limits are of what they support and what they do not support, for example, the reconquest of the Grimm would be something that Germany would support, something very delicate question: how far do we want to go? Are we really not prepared? So when I hear that, for example, it is said that we will support Ukraine as long as it is necessary. What does that mean? What does that mean? that we hand over to Ukraine the decision on how long and to what extent we will support Ukraine, that part of our state power be transferred to Ukraine.
That cannot be the goal of German policy, especially not in accordance with the peace requirement of the Basic Law, because there is still the risk that the Ukrainians will also run out of ammunition in the spring, when the West will no longer provide them with as much support. . The West is already running out of artillery ammunition, in particular. We see that the Americans are trying to buy ammunition. for Ukraine on the market, so to speak. They themselves have already almost emptied their warehouses, and that is simply because we have a form of this here (see war) and this will now intensify even more in the winter (see a form of trench warfare).
Some time ago I said that the war in the First World War was fought from a fixed position, not dynamic, not mobile and with enormous use of artillery and that, of course, if Ukraine fires a few thousand shots a day, we will be talking about 7,000 cartridges, then the warehouses will be emptied very quickly and the West will no longer have enough ammunition. The Russians supposedly fire much more artillery ammunition per day, but they are in a position to continue producing, there is also the fact that there is no possibility of supplying the weapons that Ukraine uses or that are Russian produced, neither from Ukraine nor certainly from the West , which means that these artillery pieces are of Russian production.
If not, we will run out of ammunition very soon. Thank you very much, Mr. Kujat, for being with us today.

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact