One Trick Depravity

happy birthday Logan Paul is perhaps the most accurate description I've heard when it comes to the person we'll be talking about today Logan and, by extension, the Paul brothers were previously known for being two of YouTube's biggest troublemakers in almost every decision. that they took in videos. that they posted came full of drama, as did every Under the Sun commenter telling you why I sit in your burning pool wasn't the best idea for good reason, of course, it was a very profitable topic and I'd be lying if I said High school didn't interest me much at all, but as fun as it was to hear about his antiques at first, it would eventually turn into darker territory talking about how Jake manipulated his fan base into buying his products in the Logan's YouTube Certified Forest Classic. where things got out of control where his actions went from being just nasty semi-harmless

trick

s to orchestrating a tasteless performance that would anger and argue most everyone within earshot would sound familiar and as Logan would grow and get better at comparison to where it was years ago The sub-object in today's video appears to be approaching that level of FMA that Logan had left behind, assuming it wasn't found there today.

I plan to tell you the story of that individual, an individual who touched the same wall until it finally began to dry out, as well as the controversy he would face in trying to replace it, this individual calls himself Manned Wolfie or, you may be wondering, Well Done Wolfie. or John Wolf is essentially a fursuiting personality on the Internet, there's nothing particularly noteworthy. It's not about the individual themselves, but rather the actions they took with such a notable following attached to their account, you might be wondering what they had done to hit the popular radar, so to speak, by simply disguising themselves by doing the usual things. what I would expect, like going to hang furcons. going out with his friends and making ice cubes with his own ejaculate, these simple things in life really these were the types of tweets that John got the most widespread engagement with on his posts that consist of sexual provocation, like a video he posted of himself eating.

The nut-cracking dog treat video was uploaded two months before the Ice Cube hoax occurred, but from the title of the tweet we can conclude that at the time of upload the stunt was to celebrate reaching 1,000 followers on Twitter, something that will quickly be eclipsed in the coming months. I already talked about this terrible experience that occurred in a previous video of mine and because of how widespread the news was at the time, you are all probably very familiar with it, so I am going to be a little brief with this, at this point we come to where Jon is a provocateur, whether positive or negative, he shows a delight in getting reactions and attention from people online.

It just so happens that their method of doing this mainly involves discharging reproductive fluids where I don't belong, this can be noted simply by looking at old tweets, like to celebrate the release of my A.D after dark I go to 7-Eleven to get a pizza and then I will go BRB, if I reach 100 followers today, I will go. eat a pizza and eat it, yes, neither of which would happen that day, regardless of the fact that having sex with a pizza specifically seemed like a big deal to John at the time, much of the point is that after this missed opportunity he had to do it, he simply had to do it. topping a pizza with his own ranch dressing that's when he came up with the idea of ​​eating a 20-load pizza with this new idea, John would get right to the point and pose a poll asking if you want to go crazy at a pizza party at blfc. he asked for at least 20 participants to cover the pizza, it was the obvious next step, it's all my Persona, he did the math on everything, it just made sense, he would take the time to ask different ad accounts if they would attend. giving a PowerPoint presentation on why you should throw his party, that brings me to my sixth point, my sixth point, come on or you know, it's a watermelon, it's so hot at this point, the planning was already underway a week from blfc, you could see it.

John's enthusiasm for the event, his enthusiasm for all the degeneracy and not the shenanigans, and yes, it will be recorded and there will be plenty of video evidence of it all, lucky me, and with that all that was left to do was wait for blfc will start and start. it would certainly be on the second day of the convention, October 22, 2021, John would tweet 19 confirmed pizza goers that he had accomplished exactly what he set out to throw a party where the queen says she would make a pizza, we've already talked a lot from this. in the blfc video, so we'll just summarize what happened here, the image was posted and soon spread like wildfire across Twitter, the gasoline that was added to the flame was covered.

The pizza is shown sitting in the hallway, it wasn't until three hours after this. A tweet was posted in which Jon was tweeting about the pizza being thrown in the trash and then the original tweet was mysteriously deleted and replaced with a copy saying that the pizza was not left in the hallway, but was thrown away. . This was a half-truth, as the story would switch between this and being left in the hallway for a small period of time unscripted before later being kicked out of the hotel and then banning John from entering his building for six months, However, it wouldn't be because of the party. place on his land, at least not on paper, the reason they gave him was that he invaded his property using his company logos and his social media posts.

This makes sense since users who were upset by the original post would mention the hotel's Twitter. account and his responses, although the only post he made that I know of that has his logo is when he announced that he arrived at the location and he certainly took a beautiful photo here, but looking at what would soon follow, I can't say I would personally do it . try to dispute the decision even as blfc would come to an end for the year, it wouldn't be a proper 15 minutes of fame without the perpetrator of the event milking every ounce of cloud worth along with John's substantial momentum and follower count.

Pizza Puppy Wolf would go on to be Brand himself as the pizza guy, but don't make the mistake of referring to him as popular during this time because John is the type of guy who doesn't give a damn about popularity even though he It's true that this pizza hack was done to celebrate reaching 2,000 followers. He might have been a popular furry, yes, but for us furries, popular certainly has the potency of an insult, if this reaction had anything to do with it, regardless of whether it would soon continue. This new travel platform teams up with a friend and makes a suggestive music video for the song he writes to me.

It surprisingly has no age restrictions, but it's fine YouTube, as does an interview with Atreus Otter, although this video opened with a somewhat bitter line, now we know that furries love it. our drama, especially those who didn't attend the convention, be sure to keep this line in mind. He spends his introduction with Wheeling, who himself just got back from blfc and decided to contact Mained Wolfie to ask him what happened at the pizza party. See why everyone was so upset about him taking on the role of defender of Truth. He shows himself as he sees. There was one pizza party in particular that caught the attention of the entire Internet and the furry Twitter was simply not celebrating it, but because I am curious and I am a defender of the truth.

I wanted to know exactly what happened and why everyone was so upset. The first question Andrews would ask here is, obviously, why host this pizza splitting party. Maine Wolfie confirms that yes this is in the same as the dog treats just a celebration for a follower Milestone I passed followers and I think I don't know how to celebrate I've seen a thousand followers great I have to do something yeah I wanted to do something so I decided to cut, so the candy and eat it, that's where this started because I was like, well, for a thousand I cut streets and by 2000 I was like, I want to get 20 people together, this was my plan, that was my plan from the beginning like a couple. months before, the next question was about the top of this mountain while Wallace was sharing new information, is where the interviewer suddenly starts trying to insert his opinion into the interview, the question focused on the pizza that was placed in the hallway and on what that was all about about John.

He goes on to explain the layout of the hotel suites, how long the party lasted, being a double suite and five hours respectively. He also says the pizza was outside the door for about 30 minutes while they cleaned the room, but there was also a doorman. -as if the assistant was watching him the whole time and the people who were taking photos in the hallway were people leaving the party. This is where Atrius would highlight the problem I have with this interview, yes, I think especially most people. the people who were there at the convention understood that, but you know, a lot of people online ran away with misinformation, but um, yeah, it's unfortunate, this information happens, it really happens, yeah, in the description of this video it says, let's let the man speak for Before you judge on Twitter, what you seem to ignore is that John had ample opportunity to explain this for reference.

Atrius uploaded this video on November 1, 2021. John had posted the original image on October 22, deleted it, and posted an edited and captioned version. the next day, but here he just says that the pizza was not left in the hallway, was not thrown away, nor does he announce this detailed information other than the direct tweet responding to some random person's quote. Sweet, he didn't retweet this information for everyone who watches his account to see it, so most people just had to leave the photo of The Biohazard sitting in the wholesale room, the only thing people knew was that he himself John was tweeting that he was in the aisle accompanied by photos taken of the pizza in said aisle, so my My next question is simply after this photo was posted online, how quickly was it before you started seeing a bunch of misinformation, oh God, I mean, it was pretty instantaneous, I mean, right, it was pretty crazy, people were assuming things? they were like things that just didn't happen like I heard so many rumors and so many crazy things that people were saying like that they just weren't just that just wasn't true this wasn't true it was instantly honestly like it was as soon as I posted the pizza um I mean, I made the comment saying it was in the hallway, like I mean, I was joking, right, it's probably a bad thing, a bad thing to say that this information would have only been seen before this interview.

In two scenarios, if you had sweet alerts on or were actively looking for them so the mentality that you weren't in the scam and didn't know about it doesn't work if you actively decide to tell what happened poorly if I shared it among friends or something. I could see how that would make sense, but this was posted and shared on the internet. You know the place where privacy dies. What you should say here is that you need a PR team or a better way. trust the information that is shared on the internet, don't keep saying that misinformation is like wildfire when information is not provided correctly.

I know it sounds like I'm irrationally angry at John, but I'm not, yeah, I'm more irritated. that this is being sold as some kind of groundbreaking interview when it's really just a video in which John tries again to clear up the story, this time getting direct help from an acquaintance while doing so, so the irritation isn't coming from the information itself, but how it is shared in the overall message that the interviewer is trying to sell it to the point that it almost makes a mockery of what the definition of an interview is when the interviewer's true intentions are as obvious as Atreus's, You can't really refer to it as just another interview, right, and if without any additional context of what you were trying to give, I mean, I could see how people would confuse it, but you know they should mind their business, you know, mind your business. your affairs, do not put your business on the Internet for everyone. to see if you don't want everyone to comment on that matter, it's the same.

I won't really, personally, touch on the rest of this interview in this video because nothing beyond this point is really substantial to the timeline here. John just gives more. information we already know but Atria spends a lot of time watching Manny against Puritanism and people commenting on the drama that shouldn't be because a tweet posted publicly on the Internet was none of our business and if it was supposed to be an exclusive interview, then the defender of The truth is that he does it here in a very unprofessional way. My problem is not the fact that he posted the video, but the fact that he advertised this as an exclusive interview when he really should have called him. what was a videoin which he and Mained Wolfie justified having a pizza party and posting it on Twitter while the story was still hot and ready or, as I like to call it, a conversation between friends broadcast to their online audience.

We're just, you know, jealous that they weren't there, although since I guess we're allowed to give our opinions freely here, let me tell you this honestly, this whole situation could have been a lot worse and, realistically, a lot of what happened It was like this. It's nobody's business, but it seemed like Twitter really wanted to get involved in this convention, so I say if it doesn't hurt you or other people, what's the problem? You'd think a furry of all people would be better versed in how to do it. Internet culture works in a way that when you post on the Internet it allows anyone who sees it to give their opinion.

I guess that's not always the case after what can only be described as making Your Meme your brand and taking it to the ground, After that, John came up with a new plan, another idea to headline the pizza party as we made our way into the New Year, what if a group of people got together and this time they just went crazy with an object instead. of a food? Jon and his friends would be inseminating a pipe. This event would be marked for Las Vegas at Sun City Mercon compared to the pizza fiasco. There wasn't much hype towards this stun, as there were at least no previous ones that I was able to come across personally, but there was more than enough evidence pointing to the event actually happening: be it a photo of Jon with the tarnished pipe, a selfie of the alleged 34th person who spit into the last tube, as well as a video of the fifth person preparing to do the same and before you ask yes, you heard me right 34 on February 5, 2022, a final count of 34 people attended and contributed to John's bong filling up much like the pizza incident.

Several attendees were unapologetic as they wore their attendance as a badge of honor, the numbers being 5 34 22 and 16. Several other attendees were identified by their leather suits, but in the end you probably had to ask a question after all this and The answer to that question is yes, he took a pipe from that pipe then come on, he would do anything for Jesus. I found over 1700 times in the word of God where this word come is used and that is not coming and the rest is coming, but that is just calm, preaching with all my heart for 45 minutes to an hour about that, in general, this party was a sign that the initial shock and all the pizza I had received had already passed, this event was a much smaller footnote compared to the one that followed and although yes, this may contribute to it not being As fun as a bukaki pizza sounds, but after such an event, doing the same thing with a different object becomes something expected even if the number of participants this time had doubled, although a number of people will still express their displeasure with all this since they are allowed, but you can notice the decrease in the general focus towards John, at the end of it all, he would still be that furry that went crazy. on a pizza, nothing he provided afterwards was new or innovative, it would be like Tyler the Creator peaked when he ate that cockroach in the Yonkers video, he has no drive to do anything other than that, he makes no effort to Turn a hobby into a career. something he loves, no, he just decided to become the Cockroach guy, so that's essentially what we're starting to witness here with John as the strange dissipates in Limelight turns to another topic or two hikokota poutine in the outside world as a whole. they wouldn't do it.

I blink, well I probably would, honestly, I mean, if you've ever had poutine, you'll never go back to French fries, but like a wise man once said, cocaine is an amazing drug, well, I have clout, but I'm close enough, I guess. In the face of absolutely egregious accusations of emotional abuse and bestiality leveled against the fur suit company's Cactus Donuts, it's no surprise that there's a thread on Twitter listing people who bought fur suits from them or who still publicly support the company afterward. for these accusations to become public like You really can't be expected to do much with your suit if you bought it before the accusations came out.

You can and should report them, but what are you going to do? You will burn your leather suit. You spent over a thousand dollars protesting. Slate Collie is a fursuiter mentioned on this list not because he purchased the fursuit from him after the allegations, but because he continues to support the company, as evidence against the owner of dhc appears on Twitter every two weeks. It also doesn't help that he's been defending bestiality for several years on his baby first site account, something he would even duplicate much more recently. The reason I mention this is that John ended up getting involved with this, being the supposed Slate acquaintance that Jon felt he needed. to defend zoo owner Falcon, not for zoophilia directly, but for having a DHC suit, calls the tweet disinformation and says Slate had his fur suit for years before dac accusations became his proof of that this claim is a photo of Slate Hab. with the lawsuit in 2018.

I think you misread the initial tweet as it said that they were on the list if they bought the skin suit after the accusations or if they supported them after the accusations , at least until I checked the tweet he quoted and saw that the proof was attached directly to the tweet, this didn't stop John from continuing to say that because he had a suit before the accusations were made, everyone in the thread had to having been falsely accused and how they believed a stupid man. tweet verbatim that you were a sheep and you can't do your own investigation without mentioning the evidence beneath the tweet.

I guess we're supposed to take his tweet at face value. I mean, that tweet is odd-dated and legitimately has nothing to do with the evidence attached to the thread, but keep in mind that this is just about the Don't Hug Cacti aspect of Slate's history. Jon never mentioned his thoughts on the zoophilic tweets he made, at least not until he told someone he criticized Slate Souffleck's posts by chastising them as seeking influence and attention. Remember when I pointed out Atreus's stubborn stance that wasn't appropriate for an interviewer and how they turned out to be acquaintances later?

Well, that's a pretty common mentality you'll come across when speaking out against a renowned pup in the fandom, you'll notice that just as Atres had no problem wearing his intentions on his sleeves, Jon had no problem doing the same. in Threzo P.'s DMS he has no intention of doing anything but constantly screaming into the void and showing his complete and other lack of self-awareness. His mind wouldn't have been carried away no matter what you showed him. Like most, he trots out the inspection element excuse regardless of the messages. be available via file links even as he belatedly admitted that the tweets were real.

John was still enough to defend them by saying that it was eight years ago and that they are a different person now, you know, regardless of saying that bestiality is not as bad as bestiality as if they were not themselves Jon did this to several people through from Twitter and Telegram, which I'll link to those chat logs in the description, but surprisingly this wouldn't be the Apex where it would begin its downhill descent. instead, it would be due to sexism because, as you see, in his intense quest to attack his detractors, he would come across a user who would express his thoughts about Jon defending the Kali board, in response, he would say: Ax battle, this would be the first skill in the coffin. as well as a reminder that Jon is still the provocateur he always showed himself to be.

This screenshot will be broadcast moments later, as Jon had just dug himself deeper into a hole by not acknowledging the statement being made here, nor even attempting to refute it, and instead choosing to use an insult, the only thing is that this insult would immediately be taken as an attack on the person's race, the person he went here for was an indigenous person so I'm sure you can see where the connection was made, however I'm not sure. that's the case here only because of the derogatory meaning of battleaxe is defined as an aggressive older woman, so it's likely that John wasn't trying to be racist here, it's just a question of whether he was being sexist or racist decisions. the reason why I am bleeding more towards sexism because of what happened after this.

Later we could see another user who criticized Jon talking about his menstrual cycle. We completely separated ourselves from discussing the situation upon noticing this tweet. John took the opportunity to type no wonder you were being like that to me in my timeline it all makes sense now keep your nose where it belongs and out of the business that doesn't involve you this is where the tolerance for John's antics will soon wear off. would make his way to an open window At first, John apologized in his late-night account, saying what he said was unpleasant and that he doesn't support negativity.

Now I'm not skeptical about this apology because it's on his secondary account and not his main account, which he has an exponentially larger follower account. I'm more skeptical because this is a guy who was just defending the zoo files to Helen Back, raiding multiple users' DMS to break them for thinking the board could tolerate bestiality. Here they are apologizing for what really got them Wiley. He criticized commenting on something directly sexist or racist. It's safe to say it wasn't taken well, although the consensus was that it was the equivalent of a women's apology, sorry. I mean, this is the expected case that you could see him getting criticized for doing.

This is just to answer that there are better ways to do it but I'm not going to retract what I said. I'm getting tired of people thinking they can talk and blocking me. I wanted to respond and I did. You can judge me. All you want for that is a complete reversal of the position that we would see when you would try it again on the same day, this time on your main account. It probably sounds like a lot, but I don't think this move was too well thought out. This is hard to do because I want to take responsibility for what I said and I want to apologize for what I said.

Am I analyzing it too deeply here? That's probably going to stop me from doing it. I can't answer that with a straight face first of all. I know we're all thinking about that, so I'll go ahead and say it. I wore a colorful furry animal head during an apology video. It is perhaps the second safest way to ensure that no one takes your words seriously. Because? in the second you can ask, but seriously, just an excessive image or an audio only post or something where you don't have to show your real face, but it's better than this, so immediately John would say that he's not personally sexist or misogynist.

The reasons he gives to dissuade this claim is that he has friends who are women. I am not personally sexist nor do misogynists have a new way of treating women. I really am not. I have a lot of female friends in the fandom and I've never been hateful towards them, but honestly, it's not on the same level as your usual YouTuber apology. He vaguely describes what he regrets at first, calling him hateful towards a woman for being a woman instead of calling this woman out because he insulted me during. his menstrual cycle and today I was hateful and mean to a woman for being a woman, admittedly, although he at least rectifies this later in the video.

He actually says something that he shouldn't have said and, um, for me to tell him. Um, a woman and commenting on her period and calling her a is wrong and not at all right, and I recognize that, although she occasionally incorrectly connects two sentences of buzzwords, making them much more obvious to recognize that it sucks and is humiliating, it is difficult do this. because it's not like I feel like I have to, but I want to, but the core of this video was that he apologized to both the woman he insulted and those who had to watch it because he considers himself someone who spreads positivity in the fandom.

He says that this is not a very confident face and that he couldn't say anything about it, but he wants to, but I don't think he knows what he is saying that he finds it difficult to apologize when what he is apologizing for is giving a sexist answer. . having someone criticize him in any way undermines him, that's why I personally don't see this as too genuine an apology because in my opinion making a sexist retort alone doesn't justify an apology video if you plan on addressing the whole collie situation whiteboard like well that would be nice or even call out the battle ax comment too which is never explicitly mentioned here even under the umbrella of sexist posts and even though it's just one comment um it doesn't matter if it's one or a hundred. the severity is still there and I definitely acknowledge that I'm sorry, I don't think you will, it's not my place to accept or reject the apology thatwhat it meant to the person who insulted and that is her decision, but he did it too.

I apologize to those who had to see the comment, so as someone who had to see it for this video this left a lot to be desired, it's not terribly bad but it's a bit of a slap in the face to see you only publicly acknowledge the relatively A minor controversy, you got into gender-based insults, he would only sabotage himself further by posting a third apology two days later, this is the last time I'll talk about this for a long time, this was the title of the third publication. would do in response to this Fallout, the post itself reads almost like a repeat of the second, starting with we are only human, we all make mistakes, some are worse than others, it says that these actions were from a heated player moment due to who insulted him on the Internet, also explains that battle X is not a term he was using to establish his race or indigenous origin.

He had no idea what his ethnicity is. He was using it instead to say ironically, aside from these sexist comments, he then mentions the zoophilia controversy, oh. Sorry, no he doesn't, he just says that calling him a zoo archive apologist is very wrong and without explaining why they call him One to begin with, instead we ramble more about how he doesn't hate women and that women they are great. and he cites dope like and has great personalities, after all there is a reason he is pansexual, but the overall message of this post remains the same: people make mistakes and that he is a misogynist or owner of Zoo Falcon a Although he doesn't explain anything about his staunch defense of the slaykali or even the red rocket bong.

That he owns the latter may be a bit of a stretch, but after the accusations, if you can donate zoophilia, there are surely better things for your image. that don't involve talking out of a bong shaped like a dog penis on 420. I'm just throwing it away. out there, but you're probably wondering how he tripped over himself this time, besides the next damage after this, it was a strangely ironic line he put in this post that says you can choose to feed and feel the flames of the fire. looking for drama and clout or you can choose to accept that I'm just human looking back at John's story you can probably feel the lack of self-awareness oozing here from the irony however just remember this line here because the next image in this post shows complete deafness, announces that he will attend furry week in Atlanta 2022 and about the details of his next party that will arrive soon and end with his trademark, okay, off the record, what sound does it make?

He even imitates what animal sound. Isn't he canine? howling mule sounds like that and it's legitimately affecting me anyway, something that has barely come and gone would be the announcement of his next party, an announcement that will sink further into infamy, but before we get to that, John would post a fourth post for the same day as the 3rd addressing the controversy here, he laments that this post wasn't supposed to be another apology, but his thoughts and comments on it are the same as addressing sexism and promising to change as a person. The same thing we've seen in the last three so far, but the only thing that would undermine this post wasn't even the post itself this time, just him sharing the Battle Ax fan art he received a week and a half after this post in this moment.

It's getting harder and harder to tell which actions are yet another provocative move or just Jon engaging in blatant stupidity to gain online notoriety, a line that his upcoming announcement on April 24 would easily tarnish. John would announce plans for his third sticky reunion, the name to come. Cancer tells you exactly everything you need to know. John and his group were ejaculating in the name of Charity, that is, the testicular cancer society. A screenshot of the Telegram group used to organize the event will show the details of what was planned. According to this, there was a raffle that will be held, you will be given a ticket to participate just for attending, but you could receive more tickets through three methods by giving or receiving a nut or by placing a nut in the salt dakimakura marina to be given as a raffle prize along with a menswear design package and other possible docks is an absolutely nauseating thought, but remember guys, you are being degenerate for charity, fat completely negates how absolutely disgusting the idea of Have a sex party for a nut cancer awareness non-profit organization.

Either way, there was a large crowd of those who would share their displeasure as well as their stories of experiencing or losing a loved one to cancer due to the strong backlash, retweeting two of the replies that disavowed the event only to then undo it. in favor of removing more fursuit content as well as posting a message about the backlash the legend is never too late to change a statement that loses all meaning to him when this is the fifth time you need to respond to a controversy you have created all in the same month he says how they never wanted to insult or offend anyone who suffers from cancer the three have been affected by the disease and they sympathize with everyone due to the reaction they announced that they would change the name, theme and details of the party in addition to offering phrases I I never thought I would have to hear out loud something like how we won't be coming anymore because of cancer and that there will be other activities and events to raise money for the charity.

However, that will not be done when you come. Yes they are still planning to raise money for the charity at this event talking about if the charity knows anything about this, the testicular cancer society and the Testicular Cancer Foundation were contacted via email and asked if they were aware of what John had been planning, not only were both charities completely unaware, but TCF also clarified that it was the testicular cancer society listed in the Tweet. They basically said they wouldn't admit it was a fundraiser for their group since it doesn't follow their fundraising code of conduct.

This was immediately taken to mean John was trying to swindle money. of people under the guise of an Endeavor charity personally, I don't really see it even without seeing John arrive at fwa in his skin suit, presumably throughout the flight, there is a tried and true explanation for this, as well as a Most of his actions John doesn't think about his actions at all, he recklessly steps forward without thinking about what will happen next. If you look back, you'll see it happening over and over again. It happened with the blfc pizza he shared. information to a random response and hope everyone has seen it and it keeps happening during Slate Kali's ordeals and sexist comments and because you don't think ahead the next step you need to take is almost always damage control, that's why we have the interview with the otter atreus and four damn answers that really only talk about a small corner of the hole that was dug and Ong.

I don't think these controversies should define it in any way, the thing is that people really have to make the effort to do it. that and that won't happen unless you really want to change yourself, so if a certain green furry is watching this video, you can change it for the better, as you have repeated so many times, only to delete everything later, but you know or you can take zoo notes Falcon meeting a friend who you seem so adamant about defending with that same ideology of change, even when they doubled down right in front of you, your choice, but since we've reached the end here, does it do it for me?

This video was most likely uploaded on the last day of FWA and while it said they were changing the name and changing the topic of cancer, it wouldn't just focus on the fact that it was scheduled for May 7th, the day I'm recording this. So if you hear me say this, nothing about it has been made public yet or it's just been canceled completely. If anything comes up after this upload, you should see me mention it in a pinned comment, if not another video entirely, but for now that was it and Wolfie, an Internet Person who I personally see as an amalgamation of what I find wrong with the fandom furry: The fact that someone can just go crazy with food, leave it in the hallway for a while, and gain thousands of followers overnight, I don't think so. platforming is something that absolutely has to be done, but maybe we as a fandom should be more critical about who we give internet fame to, who, what happened, there's nothing else you can do about it except learn for the future.

I'm sure out there preaching my heart out for 45 minutes to an hour in your head and it goes on and on and on. I know this is silly, folks, but there are people who still don't get it, so bear with me when I say. come means come you come when I turn to my son and say come I want you to come that word comes Universal