BEAR Implant Clinical Story | Surgery for ACL Tears | Miach Orthopaedics

Repairing a torn ACL has been of interest to the orthopedic community for decades, however, a limited indication and inconsistent results have persisted, and while ACL reconstruction is the best treatment available, current methods are not exempt. of short and long term challenges that explain why the quest to cure and restore native acl has not slowed down the introduction of enhanced bridging acl restoration is the first fda approved technology that allows acl to heal itself It is the culmination of two fundamental discoveries in ligament science: the first is that the presence of active plasmid and synovial fluid surrounding the ACL causes fibrinolysis and the inability of a torn ACL to form a temporary scaffold or bridge at the site. of the wound and the second was that the ACL can perform other critical functions necessary for healing to occur, including cell and vessel proliferation, cell migration and collagen production.

One of these two discoveries led to the development of the bare

implant

through an easy bone-preserving arthroscopic technique. Sutures are inserted into the torn anterior cruciate ligament and then autologous whole blood and joint blood are added to the bare

implant

. The implant is then placed to bridge any gap between the femoral ACL remnant and the tibial stump resists synovial enzyme degradation and allows growth and proliferation of cells and vessels at the wound site within eight weeks. The bare implant is resorbed and replaced with native cells, collagen and blood vessels, and continues to remodel and strengthen over time. indicates that the bare implant facilitates healing of the native ACL, such that at 24 months its size, geometry, and tissue composition more closely resemble native ACL tissue than autographed level one.

The evidence for the bare implant demonstrates equivalence in ikdc and instrumented AP knee laxity at two years when compared to ACL reconstruction, this is significant because the torn ACL is not removed or replaced with a large, mechanically strong graft. diameter, but is restored with the help of the bare implant. An evidence also showed that the effectiveness of the naked implant was the same for everyone. types of

tears

treated showing that the bare implant is an effective treatment option for the majority of patients with types of ACL

tears

receiving the bare implant have also continued the trend toward a lower rate of contralateral ACL tears compared with ACL reconstruction patients and 86 percent of treated patients. with the naked implant return to pivot sports in one year the naked implant is the first substantial advance in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears backed by decades of research and level one

clinical

evidence in the hands of surgeons the naked implant has the potential to last forever modify the standard of care for patients with ACL injury For more information, visit meockortho.com.