Why Canada Is Banning Foreigners From Buying Homes

A new Canadian law came into effect earlier this month

banning

foreigners

from purchasing residential property in the country as an investment for two years. The law was passed in reaction to rising home prices caused by the pandemic, in addition to an already unaffordable housing market for many Canadians, especially those living in large cities like Vancouver or Toronto. This policy is expected to reduce market demand so that ordinary citizens just looking for a place to live will not do so. having to compete with foreign investors who want to profit from the

homes

by turning them into rental Airbnbs or simply using them as land banks.

Unaffordable properties are by no means a problem unique to Canada or many economies around the world have struggled with unaffordable real estate. Real estate markets make it quite difficult for ordinary people to live and work in the cities in which they were born. The long-term impacts of unaffordable housing can be huge for economies if not managed well because it can slow the pace at which people go into work. families may cause lower participation in the labor force and will force people to leave productive centers of industry due to these problems; There are likely to be many other economies watching to see whether Canada's foreign investment ban works well over the next two years.

Or if it was simply political complacency, there are already plenty of other economists saying this is too little too late and the plan is unlikely to do much for the housing market that is already falling due to rising interest rates. and concerns about prolonged recessions. and people are changing the way they use their

homes

, but because this is such an important issue that affects us all so directly, it is worth getting a good understanding of some key economic issues, so firstly, Canada's ban on foreign investors will actually reduce home prices in the country, what are some of the negative side effects this market intervention could cause, and finally, what will happen when this ban ends in two years.

Currently supposed to be explained in this episode of Economics, brought to you by established titles established titles is a fun and silly little way to make yourself or a loved one seem a lot more important than you really are by

buying

a little souvenir plot and taking advantage an old Scottish custom whereby homeowners are called Lads or Lords and Ladies in English now, while that title may not come with a castle and armor, it can technically be used for things like credit cards and plane tickets, and nothing says nobility like being Lord of the economy class seat 38f, the most important titles established Works directly with a tree planted and trees for the future to support global reforestation efforts, so if you are thinking of a fun gift for the Day Valentine's Day gift that gives you something back, why not turn that special person into a gentleman or lady?

The first 200 people to purchase a title pack using my link will do so. It will be effectively next to my plot just a few minutes walk away, so depending on how many of you want to become a lord or lady, we can build our own little economy. Kingdom explained, the real estate market receives a lot of attention from economists for a few There are good reasons why our house is usually the largest purchase an economic participant will ever make and it is also a purchase that is usually made with debt. Real estate is also a large source of government revenue through land taxes, sales duties or some combination of the two, so purchasing a home has broader impacts on the economy long after it is purchased. the transaction is carried out.

Likewise, foreign investment is also something that gets a lot of attention from economists because it is one of the main ways money can come in and go out. an economy, so it makes sense that foreign investment in housing probably gets more attention than it really should because of the impact it actually has on an economy, but for now let's look at these issues one by one: House prices in the Most advanced economies become something that needs to be carefully monitored because it simultaneously accounts for people's investments, their biggest spending, and where they live. If housing prices rise too much relative to people's incomes, it can have a number of undesirable impacts on the economy, for example, if people pay more in rent or mortgage payments just to live in their home, There will be less money left over to spend on everything else, and local businesses like restaurants, gyms, and entertainment venues are often the first things to be cut from family budgets to cover these costs.

Higher housing prices also directly impact households. companies because commercial real estate and residential real estate are effectively the same markets, if one is becoming more expensive the other will be two, this means that companies end up paying a larger portion of their income on rent and are forced to increase their prices to compensate or save money in other areas, such as reducing wages. Reducing wages further reduces the amount of money consumers have to spend in the economy and also means those workers simply won't be able to afford it. to live in the area where they are needed, this problem was only accelerated by the pandemic, which caused real estate prices in places like Canada to skyrocket in value.

Businesses were suffering from rising real estate prices while struggling to attract customers due to closures and travel restrictions. many were kept alive by government programs many went out of business and some simply got by by raising prices and cutting all expenses they normally could, starting with workers, now housing prices should eventually be capped by how much people earn at that time. area, even if the average worker saved absolutely nothing and spent every last dollar he earned on rental mortgage payments, he couldn't spend more than he earned. So, eventually, home prices would have to reach a limit.

This is true, but the rise of platforms such as Airbnb and the migration of well-paid remote workers moving to cheaper areas has meant that the real estate sector in certain regions, especially large tourist cities, is no longer limited by how much its residents can earn, but by how much people from abroad are willing to spend there at a microeconomic level. This can cause social problems because it displaces normal residents and replaces them with tourists, so the only businesses that can survive are the ones that cater to those tourists, meaning that the few people who weren't already excluded from these areas are They would be forced to move. because the usual essential businesses, such as supermarkets, simply do not operate there.

High housing prices can also make the economy very difficult to control. In most economies, the mortgage interest rates that people pay change as the Central Bank changes its target rates if a central bank needs to increase. interest rates to fight inflation in an economy where many people have taken out very large loans to buy a place to live, then they risk putting the economy into recession because people's payments will increase significantly if they are forced to sell their homes or end up stopping their mortgages, it will create a very unstable market that could accelerate the inflation that the bank was trying to combat in the first place, this can cause stagflation, which is high unemployment, low growth and higher inflation, a very dangerous place for anyone.

If house prices make up a more reasonable proportion of people's income, then the central bank is allowed to make more decisive moves without risking sending the economy's most influential market into a tailspin. All of these economic problems also ignore the main issue that people need a roof over their heads. Shelter is one of the most fundamental human needs and economies exist to improve the living standards of its participants. It is difficult to argue that even a very rich economy is successful if its people cannot provide that fundamental roof. themselves, so keeping house prices at a reasonable level is very important for the productive functioning of an economy, but there is also a very strong argument that governments should not interfere with markets last year I had the lucky to have been invited to be a speaker. at an Economic Forum held by the then Minister of Finance here in Australia, a country with a property market very similar to Canada in that it is expensive relative to already very high incomes and foreign investors have much of the blame for those unaffordable housing since this was before.

In one election the issue of house prices naturally arose and the public was asked, by show of hands, who was in favor of affordable housing, unsurprisingly, the majority of people raised their hands. Minutes passed and some more questions were answered by the speakers and then back to the audience they were asked by raising their hands who would support economic policies that would reduce the prices of their homes. Nobody raised their hand. Unfortunately, the irony was lost on much of the audience and yes, of course, the type of people who attended. at a government forum on economic policy, generally speaking, they were going to be older, wealthier homeowners, but they still liked the idea of ​​housing being affordable, as long as it wasn't their home that was affordable, that wasn't It is completely unfair, as people have been told for a long time.

Buying a home has long been good financial management and is an important step toward other financial goals like retirement. If housing prices were artificially lowered by government policies, many people would be left with mortgages that are worth more than the homes they own. You might think that's precisely the risk to take when

buying

a home, but if people can barely afford to pay these mortgages, they may find themselves locked in a house for two or three decades without being able to move out in search of better housing. opportunities, because if they move out of their home, they will be forced to pay the difference between the outstanding loan and the sales price.

If people buy houses as an investment then they should accept the risks associated with all investments where they are never guaranteed to make money and in some cases you can lose money but people would obviously prefer that not happen. , especially if they have gone into a lot of debt. Most people simply buy a house as a place to live and probably don't really care about the market. The price of their house is on any given day as long as it is less than their outstanding mortgage or any other house they want to add or reduce in the future.

The reason this is important is because Canada is a democracy which the government needs to do. policy in line with the will of the people and Canada has a home ownership rate of 66, so most people do not want real estate to become cheaper, even though it is one of the biggest arguments against

banning

foreign investment in real estate presented by critics of The Canadian government's recent policy decision is that it will not do much to fix housing. The law they just implemented specifically prohibits

foreigners

from investing in residential real estate in Canada, but they are allowed to buy a house if they plan to live their life. there or if they are permanent residents or have a work visa or a student visa.

Foreign citizens with temporary residence status, refugees, diplomatic council staff and members of international organizations living in Canada can also purchase property. The law also only applies to residential housing, so if a foreigner wanted to buy an apartment block with four or more units, they would also be allowed to buy recreational properties such as cabins, vacation homes and tourist service apartments - basically all most popular categories on Airbnb. Many economists note that this law might appeal to popular sentiment by keeping the rich in other countries out of homes that could be owned by Canadians, but it probably won't reduce housing demand much, according to data surrounding the Canadian real estate sector. .

The market is mainly collected at the provincial level, so there are some regions that simply do not track the informationrelevant in all provinces that do show that the proportion of residential properties where one or more owners were non-residents was less than six per cent, with the only exception being the City of Vancouver, where the rate was 6.2 per cent. A reasonable assumption is that many of those foreign buyers also had a Canadian partner, so they would still have an outlet to buy any Canadian home they wanted after this law was passed anyway. These figures also track current ownership, not new purchases, which has been trending downward in recent years.

In 2021, just 1.1 percent of British Columbia home sales involved a foreign buyer, down from 3 in 2017. This trend was caused by a combination of new taxes on foreign investments and a general tax on foreign investment. real estate speculators who left their houses empty. Realistically, these tax measures would probably solve the problem without needing an outright ban on investments, which has more holes in it than a Tim Hortons display case and could also have caused more problems. of what they fixed last week, we did a video looking at the DRC economy now, obviously, and I can't emphasize this enough.

Canada is a very different economy than the Democratic Republic of the Congo, one is one of the richest nations in the world and the other. It is one of the poorest, but the Democratic Republic of the Congo in Canada shares a similar economic problem: they lack the investment necessary to obtain optimal performance from their workers. The Democratic Republic of the Congo is an extreme example where almost no one is willing to invest in a country affected by corruption. conflict and economic mismanagement, but Canada still suffers from the same problem: the average Canadian worker produces $57 of value every hour, while the average worker in the US produces $73 of value every hour even though Canada has a slightly healthier and better educated workforce. is that institutions in the United States invested twenty thousand five hundred dollars per worker and worked capital as of 2019, where Canadian institutions only spent thirteen thousand dollars in the same period.

We've already covered this specific topic extensively in our video on Canada's economy, so I don't want to repeat too much here, but the reason Canada doesn't invest more in its workers is because it can't. The United States is the investment capital of the world, for many reasons it uses the world reserve currency it houses. Fantastic global companies. It has a strong legal system for resolving trade disputes but above all, it is very friendly to foreign investors. Receiving trillions of dollars in investment from countries around the world allows American companies to give their workers the tools they need to create. companies that become household names, any international investor investing money in Canada would have to have a good reason for choosing it over the much larger and obvious market in the South, which could pass laws such as banning foreign investment in real estate residential.

It doesn't directly stop investment flows to more productive markets like public and private companies, but it does send a message to international investors that Canada doesn't want their money even though they could probably benefit from it; In fact, foreign investment could be one of the keys to fixing housing affordability if foreign investors were welcome to use their money in the country as long as it was spent on projects that built new housing rather than trying to downsize. of one percent of demand in a market that was already falling from its hidden peaks, a much more productive long-term strategy would be to simply build more houses, this may not be as politically popular as a policy that places blame on a factor that is not, but if Canada and other advanced economies want to continue their policy of inviting skilled workers into their country to replace their aging populations, then the indisputable truth is that they are going to need a place to put them all and The solution to that problem is not to get people to demand less, but to implement systems to offer more.

Don't forget that you can also listen to all of our videos on Spotify as video podcasts. This means you can watch EU videos in the Spotify app and easily switch to audio-only for on-the-go listening. The link is in the video description below. thanks for watching friend bye