Anthony Blinken left stumped, angry by question from brave ITV reporter on Gaza | Janta Ka Reporter

and it's time, it's time for these shameless politicians to be publicly shamed that the hypocrisy has been publicly exposed Secretary of State. I mean, you've expressed outrage today and in recent days over the deaths of those seven international aid workers, eloquent outrage, but it begs the

question

. Um, there have been hundreds of humanitarians killed in Gaza over the last 6 months, dozens of journalists, many people who have been waving white flags and yet have been shot down by IDF forces. I mean, where was the outrage then and why didn't you do it then? offer to reshape American policy if necessary, why are they only now just the passports these seven had?

Our Foreign Secretary, David Cameron, was in Washington today, where he met with his American counterpart from Party C, Anthony Blinkin, and they both addressed the media and, as usual. There were some

question

s from certain journalists about the situation in Gaza and the alarming cases of humanitarian crisis, so, first of all, you know that these two gentlemen seemed very willing to blame Hamas for everything I did. I mean, if there's no end to the shamelessness, listen to them. I would just like to point out that ultimately the people responsible for holding these hostages are Hamas, they could release the hostages now.

I'm not involved in the negotiations manual, but I know it. You know that Israel has made very large offers to release many prisoners from their prisons in response to the release of hostages and you know that we need the hostages to come home, we need help to get in and it is a mass more than anyone standing in the way path for that to happen we have our teams working on this 24/7 we are working, as you know, closely with cutter with Egypt with Israel um Bill Burns has been doing an extraordinary job um on this um many of us have been deeply engaged in working with the U with the governments concerned.

We have an offer that is on the table now for Hamas that is very serious and should be accepted. Hamas could go ahead with this immediately and get a ceasefire that would benefit the people. throughout Gaza and, of course, bring the hostages home. I think the fact that he continues not to say yes is a reflection of what he really thinks about the people of Gaza, which is not much at all. The range is also extraordinary. to which Hamas has almost been erased from this story um as we both said going back almost to the first day uh nothing that we have seen in Gaza um would have happened if Hamas had handed over the hostages immediately and

left

their weapons stopped hiding behind the civilians uh and they surrendered um now you have the opportunity to accept the proposal on a ceasefire and on the hostages the ball is in Hamas's court the world is watching to see what he does what happened is that they both boarded the media topic and then there were certain

reporter

s, four of them were actually selected to ask questions, the first was a lady from CBS, the second was a lady from the Financial Times, the third was from a gentleman from the BBC and the fourth was a ITV gentleman. um, it was the ITV

reporter

's question, it was the ITV reporter's question that really upset Anthony Blinkin so much that the guy just forgot that he's the Foreign Secretary or the Secretary of State, um, of the so-called most nation. powerful in the world.

In the world, he was almost begging people why you know there's been silence about Hamas really in his word, so they basically asked him a question in the uh. The ITV reporter was brutal. You have to applaud the ITV journalist. You know, because of his honesty and asking a question. He questions the way he should have been asked, without any sugar coating, without political correctness, directly exposing the double standards and hypocrisy of the Western nation. He asked and said this is exactly what I had asked him in one of my previous videos, which you know, would you have the United States or the United Kingdom? registered their indignation if those seven foreign aid workers that you know had different passports, that is, if they were Palestinians or let's say you know some, they belong to some African countries or some South Asian countries, the United States would have reacted with the same indignation as Did you know that in the case of these seven foreign workers, foreigners?

No, that's exactly what the ITV journalist asked and the ITV journalist also pointed out that this was not the first time he had said that more than 200 people had been murdered. More than 200 foreign aid workers have been killed. He highlighted the brutality of the IDF or the Israeli Armed Forces. In fact, there was a report that the ITV ID that ITV had covered was a Palestinian civilian, you know he was showing the White Flag if you remember you can see this on the screen and even after knowing that he showed the White Flag, the IOF terrorists brutally killed him in front of his own son?

So, you know, he asked this question and said he said, Was it like that? The question is: do you know that they have a different passport? Now you see Anthony blink. I mean, he goes on and on about the history of the last 6 months and what the US did to persuade Israel, which was not enough and then Israel was forced to open. more doors and all that, he did everything, he said everything, in fact, he also blamed Hamas once again, but he did nothing that answered the question that the journalist asked: was the passport of these seven people the attitude of Chang America towards Israel?

He didn't answer that question and that's why he missed school so much that he started blaming everyone for his so-called silence on Hamas and forgot that he is supposed to represent the so-called most powerful nation in the world. on Earth, then whose silence is about the Secretary of State? I mean, you've expressed outrage today and in recent days over the deaths of those seven International Aid workers, eloquent outrage, but it begs the question. There have been hundreds of aid workers killed in Gaza over the last six months, dozens of journalists, many people who have been waving white flags and have still been shot down by IDF forces.

I mean, where was the outrage then and why didn't they offer to do it then? reform US policy if necessary, why are the passports of these seven only now being held? the thousands of children of men's wives have been caught in a Hamas crossfire, making their loss since October absolutely heartbreaking. We have worked from day one to do everything possible to ensure that the protection of civilians was maximized and that the delivery of humanitarian assistance to those in need was also maximized. We have seen results over the course of these many months, starting with the Opening of the Rafa gate very early in the km.

Shalom flower from Ashdod. The supply of fuel has been sustained, but manifestly not sufficient. The results just haven't been there and even if the intention was, it's the results that count. and it became clear from everything that we continue to see that we have to have to have changes that result in people getting the assistance they need throughout Gaza uh and that was the meaning of the president's conversation last week with Prime Minister Netanyahu, but In many ways it was the culmination of many conversations that, as I said, produce results but are insufficient in terms of actually meeting the needs of the people, so what we are focused on now is making sure that the commitments that Israel has made are fulfilled. . doing more to do it more effectively and putting that into practice actually happens and, like I said, it holds up and, like I said, it produces results, that's the measure, that's the test, that's what we're looking closely at, we want to do everything we can. but primarily we want Israel to do everything it can and should to reduce the impact on civilians and provide assistance to those who need it to do so on a sustained basis.

I also think it would be important that much of the understandable passion and anger directed at Israel over the plight of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, some of that could also be reserved and directed at Hamas. It remains surprising to me that the world is almost silent when it comes to Hamas. We wouldn't be where we are. Did they not choose to participate in one of the most horrendous acts of brutality and terrorism on October 7 and after having done so did they not refuse for many months to get out of the way of civilians, to stop hiding behind them and to lay down their arms? free the hostages surrender where is the indignation?

Having said that, I will repeat what I have said endlessly since day one even though Israel has obligations, it has moral, strategic and legal responsibilities, to do everything possible to protect civilians and provide assistance to the many who need it, That's what we're focused on, of course, the nature of this press conference is that you know you're not allowed to have a follow-up question if there was a follow-up provision. Final question I'm sure ITV journalist Robert Mo would have asked that question: who is that um uh uh who silence are you talking about and who is the silence that America cares about number one number two what happened to me question about passport passport discrimination it was tragic what happened to those seven people they were

brave

souls who could have avoided going to Gaza but they decided to go and feed those starving people but they didn't realize that they were dealing with the most cruelest and most immoral army on Earth, which is the UIF, but then the question is that if the United States had registered its outrage like it did about 6 months ago, many lives could have been saved, but the United States decided not to, and the United Kingdom decided not to do so.

To do that, you saw the stance taken by the British, you know, British government politicians as well as Labor opposition politicians, including K St, refused to vote for the ceasefire, in fact the people those who support the ceasefire were those. Action was taken against them in the Labor Party. Now you say that the Labor Party has changed its tune and are now supporting Cire, but let's not forget that the Labor Party defended the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people, so back to Robert Mo's question. Ask, I think you know later from um uh Krishnan Guru morti, now Robert mo, more and more reporters are getting nervous and it's time for these shameless politicians to be publicly shamed, that hypocrisy publicly exposed, we have to do it, thank you very much for watching this. video If you haven't subscribed to my channel, please do so because it's one of the many ways you can support independent journalism.

God bless you all and Eid Mubarak.