„Wir brauchen die Barzahlung – auch bei einem möglichen Blackout!“| Viertel nach Acht | Julia Neigel

Now we return to something tactile, namely money, and that is part of our big theme of digitization. Ms. Tend, that is your big issue because you want the cash to continue to be in our pockets, that not everything is digitalized, that there are now plans that the Minister of the Interior has. However, for them a maximum limit of 10,000 euros sounds, they fear that in the long term it could happen that we all have to pay without cash. the long-term plan. At least that's what I heard in the speeches at the G7 summit. Then there was also a high-level conference on November 7 in Brussels where it was also mentioned that we wanted to go there.

Tell a little story: I was at Frankfurt airport and I wanted to check in my suitcase as usual and it was too heavy. There was still something to pay, I wanted to pay in cash and Lufthansa did not want to accept it and then they blatantly told me to my face that it is a cashless airport, as I said, it is useless because it is legal tender. I also wanted to go to the bakery to eat a slice of apple for €1.50 or something like that and they said it was a cashless airport. Then I complained when I found it to the airport supervisory board, that's what it was for, it was the Hessian Finance Minister who told me it was legal.

This legal medium is banknotes and coins and we actually have to carry them out, so there are these tests, Jean-Claude Juncker once said that we will test it and then we will see how far we go and then we will simply test it in such an environment agitated by air and if you get over it and do it when you pay the transmission fees in cash, it is not accepted, it is actually a small legal fact when I look at China and I look at this completely irrelevant EU parliamentary social circle, said Christian Teres in In a dictatorship, The State knows everything about the citizen.

In a democracy, the citizen knows everything about the State and I would prefer to have democracy, which means that I do not want to be a transparent person and I would also like to be able to pay in cash. and according to article 128 of the EUA Treaty According to the Union Treaty, there is only one valid legal tender and they are banknotes and coins. Then there is credit money, which means something is created from nothing, and then there is credit bank money which is used internally to balance the parts. There are no digital euros there, that's what it means.

It even violates Union law if the digital euro is now introduced without allowing all states to unanimously approve or vote on it. If they would change the treaty because they cannot introduce it without changing the treaty. They are already against this paragraph or this article 128. Completely different things 500 and 1000 euros because I am good, you are there for all eventualities, so I always have cash at home because there are situations for me in which I need it and also I am someone who always thinks about it, I have no idea, now there will be announced

blackout

s, it can also happen in the cities or we have, for example, burning more because we can no longer go to the ATM, we can no longer withdraw money from anywhere and I won't allow myself to give my personal details even to a bakery at Frankfurt airport.

That doesn't work and I really appeal to all citizens. be against it because this way of accustoming people to losing their freedoms is a wrong path that leads to a form of surveillance by the surveillance state. It has already happened. I know I'm trying to use your money to make a transfer and the postal officials insisted I tell the purpose. Fund a brothel he did. I could also have written a donation for the mischievous demise of the European Union that would also be nice, yes, and if it has to do with a bureaucracy that has been discarded. en, they have to do with that.

If you are already past your prime before 45, then you are constantly committing such absurdities and you are a transparent person, and so am I, but I don't want to allow it. Go further and, for example, I only go shopping when I go shopping, I always pay in cash. Of course, I don't have credit cards, but I still pay. That's the only thing for me. It is a purely emergency situation. , for example abroad, but I continue with this. I am the conservative. Effective, it's true. I always pay. So I know what I'm paying for. I also started working on my hand like this.

I always had my money for my work in cash and that's why I know how to handle money. For me the most important thing is to lose control of the card. Pay exactly with that and payment 1828 is yes, only money cards, the danger that we see in China is that people suddenly have their clients blocked, they practically have to have a cell phone to be able to participate in society, that is, what? Who tells me that I have to have a cell phone to be able to enter the restaurant? You can go and make an appointment.

During the day, since the ATMs do not work, they will meet tomorrow at the gas station, but joking aside, why is the federal government talking about creating that limit of 10,000 euros? It's the only reason they talk about it, so they don't even see anyone else in this, they are consequences and the new money laundering law is the law and they are suggestions now that the 10,000 is still a good sum, not because others are talking about 2,000 euros less than 5,000 that the Italians have just increased. from 2000 to 10000 or even 12000, I don't know exactly, but now they have gone up again, interestingly, no, they didn't say that, but you know that we liberals are now not in favor of cash if the EU decides to do that, then we as a country have to implement it in the country, this is how we can connect because article 128 is a home page, the same applies to the assumption of collective debts, there is hardly a law that the EU countries have yet to be has been violated and that is being addressed or not, how do you position yourself in this?

We just talked about digitalization, um, so we want that. Logically, cash still has no upper limit, no, we won't exactly. , the Minister of the Interior wants to go down to 5,000 as I understand it, Mrs Feser, yes, it is true, now we have to discuss exactly as always, but now you could do that, make a counting list. Wait a minute, then Atom gave I am the citizens' money and now we also have upper cash limits, since the Minister of the Interior is not very fine, the list of toads is getting bigger and that's like, and the woman over and over again, so it's okay.

The European money laundering law cannot do anything. Enforce the law. regulations that first make money laundering impossible. It was exactly at the end of his career before the EU brought him back to life. I know that's part of it, but you still know that the 500 euro note has been abolished. Everything is always justified by money laundering. No, that's not even supposed to be true, but no, the service provider can decide for himself about freedom and therefore all that is true, but cash of course also generates a lot of work for retail. sector yes yes and yes they and yes and yes they say that Fewer and fewer people accept cash, that is not true, that is not true, that is despite the work they have to do with cash, despite the openness despite of the focus on the poor, well, they still do it, they are always preventing them from appearing in the wrong place with many other things General suspicion Exactly when I go out on the street I would have to go to the representative of the nearest district and prove that I do not have a gun with me , which creates the general suspicion that I might have a gun on me and that's exactly why this law is that if you have a car, I would say that if you buy used cars, probably when you buy used cars, that's usually the case a lot of money real I probably also had 10 used cars I didn't eat currently the crime of the clan is being discussed there is always some reason in general yes well but it was given in a very specific way the problem is homemade so the cream of the clan is a reality.

I don't have to, I give up my money, sorry, that's not our problem, so politicians have to make sure these parallel societies don't exist, sorry, yes, the federal government can do relatively little about it. That, unfortunately of course, is done by the powers that be, but no, you must preserve your freedom, that's what they say, yes, also in matches, well, really, to the question, then we leave the issue of lost sound because that is, of course, The responsability. of the respective local police and the local Minister of the Interior and they know that we have a good concentration of crime, if we want to talk about it in Berlin.

We have concentration in Bremen and we have concentration in the Ruhr region, these are the Social Democrats. In a sense, this is a family that has spread everywhere and there are statistics about it, but that's actually a state issue, it's not a federal issue, that's the issue we want to make. Change the basic law and abandon federalism. Maybe you should just accept Article 128a EUV and not talk at first, okay, let's talk