More vaccinated deaths than unvaccinated deaths from covid (US)

Welcome to today's talk, Friday, November 25. Now, for the first time in the United States, we have data that says there have been

more

hidden

deaths

among

vaccinated

people than among un

vaccinated

people and we want to look at that in a moment. A little bit of detail in a minute and put some context on that and we also want to look at the bivalent vaccine boosters that are being administered in the states and we're going to look at the V Safe data that shows that 54.8 percent of Vaccine recipients of the bivalent boosters had systemic side effects, most of which were not serious in the time period they were looking at now.

That's the only way I can sum this up. It's a little complicated and of course YouTube rules and my own personal standards. I insist that we will analyze data from official sources and other reputable data sources, so we are not going against any guidelines from the United States government. Now, here we have this, this, this, this, it was a report, it was commissioned by the vice president of The Washington Post Kaiser Family Foundation, Cynthia Cox, who does a lot of this kind of work now. This is quite interesting. 58

deaths

from coronavirus in August with people who were vaccinated or vaccinated and that is, people who had had a primary. uh vaccine cycle, at least a primary vaccine cycle, so what seems to be happening here is that we are decreasing the protective effects of the vaccines, it is now decreasing and of course this is combined with the systemic side effects that we are experiencing.

Booster doses need to be taken into account when considering the risk-benefit analysis because we started these vaccination programs a while ago and the risk-benefit analysis has changed. We are not saying that vaccines are not. If it's not effective, we're not saying there's something about vaccines, we're just saying the risk-benefit analysis has changed, let's move on, so 42 of the deaths in August were in people who were not vaccinated, so than most for the first time. More deaths covered deaths in the vaccinated versus

unvaccinated

population in the United States. Now it's fair to contextualize this because if we look at the CDC data, we find that 80.06 percent of the United States population is vaccinated, so there are

more

people in the vaccinated group than in the vaccinated population. in the

unvaccinated

group, but it is also true as we saw that there were more hidden deaths in the first vaccinated group historically.

This is quite interesting. September 2021 vaccinated people. 23 percent of coronavirus deaths in vaccinated people. January to February 2022. it had gone up to 42 percent and as we saw now it has gone up to 58 percent, so we see that the risk benefit analysis is changing the data is there before our eyes, so a direct quote from the Kaiser Foundation in the Washington Post allows us I'm no longer saying this is an unvaccinated pandemic, so Mr. Biden, I'm not saying Mr. Biden was wrong at the time, but times have changed, we know the effects protectors, Wayne, and this needs to be taken into account when we look at the risk-benefit analysis in In my opinion, this was a weekly morbidity and mortality report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and this is a document from the CDC , so we're hitting amid official US government data safety monitoring of bivalent Covid-19 vaccines now on August 31, 2022.

The FDA authorized the bivalent booster for Pfizer and the resonance modern magnetic code that encodes the spike protein of the original SARS coronavirus II and Oregon ba4 and ba5, so it was this bivalent combination. The vaccine advisory committee on immunization uh practice recommended that everyone over 12 years of age receive an age-appropriate dose of one of these vaccines which was their recommendation at the time and, in fact, still is now v-safe en a voluntary smartphone-based safety surveillance system set up in the US by the CDC to monitor adverse events after Covid vaccination and here we have it, it's very safe here now.

I don't actually know much about that, so if people who are using it in the states have given me some feedback on it, that would be actually very helpful to get information on that starting October 3rd. I think there were 10 million users in that time period, so it seems like it's being used pretty well. Are we getting better data now from the states? It's certainly starting to look like that, we're getting better quality data now. The vaccine adverse event reporting system is the other way around, of course, and the information is also taken from that total data from August 31 to October 23, 14 million or so. received a Bioentec from Pfizer 8.2 million uh the modernist just over uh I think the modernist is just over 18 years old so the numbers we're getting here now are pretty big. v-safe is a little more confusing, it appears that in this time period there were 211,959 registrants over the age of 12.

A little complicated too because people under 16 must have supervision to use this program, so I don't know how that works in the states, but now registrants look like this. These are people who had just started using the app in that time period, but as is often the case with the CDC, it's not really that clear how the writers are not as transparent, very often from August 31 to October 23 is the time period. So you just have to put that finite time window for 2022 reporting in the week after vaccination, so now it's just a one-week period. Clearly, you don't have to be that smart to realize that this isn't going to create any potential. long term side effects we are not saying there are long term side effects but any potential long term side effects will by definition not be detected in the first week so it is limited but anyway reactions in place of the injection 60.8 that's not too surprising and it's not really worrying that you have a floor arm, of course, systemic reactions, although this is more worrying for me, 54.8 percent less than one percent and I think we will see later, it is approximately point eight percent.

I received medical care, so vsafe reports that some people needed medical opinions and medical care after vaccination. I don't think that's controversial, it's a simple statement of fact. The system reported vaccine adverse events, so 5,542 bivalent vaccine adverse events were reported. Quite a small number actually, that's all of them. the cases that were reported are, of course, no, of course, no, but 4.5 of them were serious. Now remember that this is from actually reported cases, but still a reasonable proportion of the actually reported cases were classified as serious adverse events. Now this is clear. from the CDC Healthcare providers and patients can be assured that adverse events reported after bivalent boosters are consistent with those reported after monovalent vaccines.

Do you see what they've done here? They are comparing bivalent reinforcements with monovalent reinforcements. They are comparing two groups. this is a relative risk, not an absolute risk, I'm not saying the CDC is being disingenuous at all, but they are reporting a relative risk, not an absolute risk, the absolute risk, um, they didn't put that in no given, so it's a relative risk. the absolute risk is going to be less than the relative risk how much less I don't know, they didn't say the information has not been disappointing from the CDC as they are only talking about the relative risk, the health impacts after the vaccines covered , uh, vaccination is less frequent. and less severe than those associated with covered illnesses again, they are comparing people who have had illnesses to people who are vaccinated, a relative risk, not an absolute risk for the entire population, I'm not saying the CDC is being deliberately disingenuous here, but there would be been better. to have information about the absolute risk and the relative risk, unfortunately the absolute risk is not provided, but we know that it will be less than the relative risk.

Now the reference they use for this is interesting because here they are making this broad statement. impacts that then Impacts on health is a broad statement that applies to everything, but the reference that they give reference to is quite specific now, that's the reference there and uh it only refers to myocarditis, pericarditis and combinations of those or syndrome multisystem inflammatory in children within seven day risk window or 21 days after the index date, so again, this is only a 14 day window from which they are taking this information and even then they are giving it as a risk relative.

I mean, we're not saying that the CDC is trying to give the wrong impression here, but it doesn't seem very well written to me. I know a lot of relatively junior academics who could write it much more clearly than this, I think, but we're not arguing with the numbers that the CDC is giving, we're more commenting on their presentation, okay, comparison between and after the vaccines after the infection again, they are comparing between the infections and, after vaccines, two groups, the relative risk between the absolute risks that are not given again, so we see that the CDC is really giving relative risks by comparing one group to another group without give the absolute risk for the population as a whole.

CDC please provide both. We need to know what the absolute risk and the relative risk are. Please now a little more detailed here a review of this mobile app secure data again during August 31 to October 23 in the same period now this is what 211 212 000 almost registered are saying, presumably they are people who new ones were recently registered in that time period, they are covered by a pretty good age group, from a few up to 12 and 17 year olds as we see more in the older age groups, but a good range of ages, no complaints not at all, uh, quite a bit. few of these 50 45 were the fourth dose and the fifth dose was 50.2 percent, but of course we know that if these risks, if complications of heart disease, especially those that the CDC admits, can occur after of vaccines, they are more likely to occur after the second dose.

Again, it doesn't give a really good overall picture, it's pretty specific to these bivalent boosters that they're talking about, in the week after getting a bivalent booster dose, local reactions at the injection site, now this is interesting , 49.7 among those over 65 years of age. highest in the youngest age group and the age group they use for comparison here is 18-49 years old. So younger people, men and women, get more uh local reactions, systemic reactions, it's the same between 18 and 49 years old, who get 67.9 local reactions compared to 43.5 in the age group. over 65 years old and when they analyze the specific problems they see the same trend that it is the younger people who are increasing more 30 in older people 53 in younger people headache again 19.7 in older people 42, 8 in younger people and again we see the same with muscle pain and fever who reported now the inability to complete normal daily activities was 10.6 among those over 65 years of age and 19.8 percent among those over 18 to 49 years after vaccination, so those over 19 in that younger age group were not able to do their normal activities after the uh, booster vaccine.

I would have thought these are pretty high numbers. uh receiving medical care was reported by 0.8 percent, now 0.8 percent taking medical advice after vaccination. I would have thought it's pretty high, but the CDC just reports it, they don't. I don't say anything about it, they just say that's what it was. I would have thought it was more like High 0.8 percent. You can decide if you think that's high, low, or indifferent. We're talking risk-benefit analysis, so here we go. I already know that it is like that. The data is pretty intense but it seems like the risks after the risk of side effects after vaccination are becoming clearer with uh vsafe, although I still don't fully understand how it works, but it's good that they are honestly reported and just combined with The risk-benefit analysis says that there are now more hidden deaths occurring among the vaccinated than among the vaccinated, although we have to be clear about this, only 20 of the population are not vaccinated, so fortunately the vaccinated are a much larger group, although covert cases are increasing.

Milder still causes some deaths, as we will see some hospitalizations, but the trend is that they are becoming milder and I think these things need to be taken into account in the risk-benefit analysis, so that's as far as we can go.arrive. In this talk I think there is a lot of data there, all the references are given. I've been as honest as I can with the data and I check the links and I'm pretty sure all my numbers are accurate. You'll have to decide how you interpret the information I've given you interesting, I don't want to say any more, well, I could say more, but it's probably best not to say more, thanks for watching.