YTread Logo
YTread Logo

Beyond Time Space - Part 1 - Chuck Missler

Apr 03, 2024
Well, tonight we are going to embark on an unusual kind of evening. We're going to remake something we did a couple of decades ago. Let's update some things. Let's explore a little about the limits of our reality. So as we do any of these things, let us begin by going before the Lord in prayer, father, we thank you for the opportunity to gather together in your name, we pray father, through your Holy Spirit and your word, you will open our understanding to the what you have here. for us and we pray father in all these things that your purposes may be fulfilled in each of our lives as we commit ourselves tonight and ourselves in your hands in the name of Yeshua our Lord our Savior our coming King, amen, well, I I put on the screen.
beyond time space   part 1   chuck missler
This little idiom from Asher's famous artwork is a kind of optical illusion, but we also find that the more we learn about our reality, we will discover that it is also a kind of illusion, so this may be the first in a series of studies that explore what I like to call the limits of our reality because we are limited and it is by discovering those limits that we learn a lot, so let's start with a study beyond

time

and

space

, both terms that we use very broadly. , a true physicist will never use any of those terms separately.
beyond time space   part 1   chuck missler

More Interesting Facts About,

beyond time space part 1 chuck missler...

A physicist, if he is diligent, will never talk about

time

or

space

separately, he will constantly talk about space-time because he recognized that they are simply dimensions of our reality. They have three spatial dimensions and one time dimension, so beyond time and space, it's a study that we published a couple of decades ago that focused a little bit on the theory of relativity and some other discoveries, especially in terms of a biblical vision of our origin, existence and destiny. and we may be surprised to discover how much the discoveries of science have helped us understand what the Bible has been saying all along, so beyond time and space is one of these topics that we are going to talk about beyond of the coincidence in another study, the evidence is of design. the anthropic principle and all that will be supported by some of the discoveries of Steven Mayer and others about the signature in the cell and we will discover that the constants of physics are encoded in the Bible, which may surprise you because the implications are really astonishing and then We will also have a refreshment on beyond perception, we are going to talk a little not tonight but in a later session about

part

icle physics, quantum mechanics and the quest that we all have at all levels to understand our physical reality and so on.
beyond time space   part 1   chuck missler
Tonight we're going to explore a little bit of some of the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity. We use that phrase so casually in our conversation, but there are some things about it, without getting into the math, there are some things that will really do it. Help us understand some of the things the Bible is about and we will gain a better insight into the biblical views of our origin, existence and destiny. We'll also touch on both in later sessions about the fallacies of falling into making linear assumptions in what is manifestly a non-linear world and not tripping over that now I'm using mathematical terms there, but actually that will become clear as we go on, so It's just a glimpse later, it's interesting for me to find out. metaphors rain where mysteries lie often there is something mysterious that they don't really understand and we hide it behind a metaphor and we want to go through them and understand a little better what is behind, we continually encounter paradoxes, in fact, one of the classic paradoxes.
beyond time space   part 1   chuck missler
Since the beginning of time it was this whole question of destiny versus free will, are we victims of destiny or do we really have free will? and philosophers and theologians have debated that since the beginning of time some of the first documents we have attempted to address Do we have real choice or are we predestined? Both terms are implied in Scripture. Are we really predestined or do we have free will? And although that seems like a paradox, it is a paradox only when viewed from within the situation or limitations of our life. time for me, so we're going to talk a little bit about that and we're going to talk about how all these things Afeni Kate the same word of God in our understanding, so we're going to talk a little bit tonight about the nature of time we'll explore a little bit about space and hyperspaces, whatever they are, and we'll talk a little more about these linear assumptions in a manifestly nonlinear world.
Now many of you are probably familiar with many of the things I'm talking about. about here because we probably did some of this for the first time about 16 years ago and they have been among our most popular studios across time and space. It's a little post that we read this many years ago and it's us, this is really a refresher on that for Firstly, there are two reasons why it has been popular; it needs to be updated, but secondly, and it's also so fundamental in our understanding of so many things that we encounter as we read the Bible, so frankly, this is an update of What was a very popular presentation, so Let's start with the nature of time and we will get some insights from modern physics.
It turns out that time is a physical property and that is not as obvious as it may seem at first. but it is deeply important to understand because unless you understand that you will not fully appreciate much of the biblical text that we know today that we do not live in three dimensions, we live in four, which is why physicists will always use the term space-time and We will talk about the revelation of Paul in Ephesians chapter 3. Paul highlights something that many people overlook and that has deep meaning for all of us. We'll talk about that and explore a little bit of some geometry lessons, but it's going to be a geometry.
That goes beyond the Euclidean geometry that you learned in school so we'll touch on that a little bit. Let's talk a little bit about the geometry of eternity. It sounds like a strange phrase, doesn't it? Yes, time is linear and absolute. people assume that it is and today we know in laboratories that it is no longer linear and it is no longer absolute and that changes everything that we thought was a rule turns out to be an elastic band that shrinks and extends depending on the circumstances and many Assumptions that we make in our daily lives are now becoming obsolete due to recent scientific discoveries, so this is

part

of what we are dealing with, so the nature of time is our topic for tonight and I want to start by reviewing some things that you learned in the school in the field of trigonometry the study of triangles and we learned in school that if you have a triangle, almost any triangle, the angles that a triangle has always add up to 180 degrees, how? many learned that in school it's okay, good for you and no matter what kind of triangle you have, whatever triangle turns out apparently meets that room, but suppose now Gary and I go out into a field, a big field, and we have a we.
Let's set up a triangle and we discover that the angles of that triangle that we place in this large field add up to more than 180 degrees. What would some of you conclude? Well, that's what I expect from Chuck and Gary. a task like that you know not so you go back to review our work and you discover, to your amazement, that it is more than 180 degrees and what we have discovered then is that those rules that we learned are only true for a two-dimensional universe, so That is, it is called simple trigonometry or simple geometry because it is true that on a flat surface a plane is fine, now it turns out that if you start studying the globe and you start studying navigation, you quickly discover that you have triangles, all of more than 180 degrees. , you can have a triangle on planet earth that has 90 degrees in each corner, okay, that's more than one hundred and eighty degrees, by the way, you can add it up and try it, okay, it turns out that if you have angles that are more than one hundred and eighty degrees. what you discover is that you are on a convex surface that is no longer flat.
If you ever come across a triangle that is less than a hundred degrees, that means you have a convex surface instead of a concave surface instead of a convex surface. and a hyperbolic paraboloid is a common example of that, but I don't think any of you would be worried about running into one of those. The real point is to realize that a violation of that little 180 degree rule is what led to dr. When Einstein realized that he was dealing with the properties of space, he began to realize that space has more than three dimensions and that is what led him to the theory of relativity because he realized that the constant of Planck was a four-dimensional constant, not three, and that's how it led to what we call Einstein's revolution, his special theory of relativity in 1905, we have less length, mass and speed relative to speed, it was part of it, but then it became generalized in 1915 and what his general theory of relativity generally means In his general theory of relativity, in which there is no distinction between time and space, we find three spatial dimensions: length, width, height and time, a point, a point in this space exists not only in terms of three spaces, but also in a moment of time. an intrinsic property of the environment we find ourselves in, there is no distinction between time and space, in fact we now know that we live in a four-dimensional continuum and this has been confirmed in at least 14+ ways with an accuracy of more than nineteen decimal places, so it's not really a theory anymore, there are aspects of the implications that are still quite theoretical, but the point is that this is now something recognized and highly confirmed here, so I want to talk a little bit about dilation of the time, there are atomic clocks that are located at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder Colorado and also at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, England, these are very complex devices and they are very, very precise, they are accurate to over 1 second for a million years and I remember vividly that I was in Annika, I was on the board of directors of a company that was acquiring in another country time frequency systems in Boston.
We were calling this company and the company that was acquiring the president was giving us a proud demonstration of their product, which was basically cesium clocks and they are accurate to over 1 second per million years and I raised my hand as director of acquisitions. , since there are only two questions: how do you know it and who cares the way we know it is from the natural resonance of the cesium atom. which is what gives you this incredible precision and that to us and who cares it turns out that the precision of measuring time determines the precision of your navigation and it is the precision of those clocks this is what makes your GPS work, you lost even when I ride it It baffles me that I could have one little thing: I could put my phone in the railroad car and tell it where I'm going and where I want and it'll tell me which lane to travel in and it'll tell me I'm not the right lane to take an exit to.
Right, I mean the accuracy of that thing, knowing exactly where I am, whether it's in the United States or New Zealand, driving on the left side, that matters, it knows exactly that I'm going to never forget the first time I was there many years ago. years, I was renting a Hertz car that had a Magellan, they call it, for one of the first GPS systems and we hadn't talked to my wife on the phone and this. A woman's voice tells me to race to get into the right lane for the next exit and the man pretended not to believe me.
I tried to explain to her that it was just this searching thing, and of course she knew I didn't know what it was, but she would know. Don't let it go, she's a joke, that in the car with you, you know, but anyway, in today's world that we're starting out in, a lot of these things are taken for granted and yet some of it It is due to the precision in the measurement of time. but let me tell you something about these two clocks, there are elaborate and highly precise devices, one in Boulder Colorado and another in Greenwich, England, they are accurate to one second per million years and yet every year there are five millionths of a second of difference. don't stay at the same pace, so the question you want to ask is okay, which one of these is the right one?
Well, it's the one in Boulder, which is five seconds per year faster than the identical clock, and the one in Greenwich, which is correct. Both are correct. The weather itself is different there than here because because Boulder Colorado is at 5400 feet elevation, it is not in the Denver area which is high altitude, Greenwich, England is 80 feet above sea level. sea, so one is higher than the other if you had a clock like that here. on the platform and I raised it a meter, okay, it accelerates by one part in 10 with 16 zeros after not much, but they are predictable and measurable time changes with gravity, that's the difference here is in gravity, so that these atomic clocks are faster by 10 one. parts into 10 with 16 zeros after for every meter of elevation, so seeThat a time measurement in a weaker gravitational field runs faster than one in a stronger field, so if you're starting to talk about days, years or months, you really have to say in what gravity field are you talking about?
Because they're different, by the way, near the surface of the Earth there's this 10, one part in 10 to the power of 16 per meter, and for what it's worth, they actually took some very precise measurements on airplanes. In 1971, JC Hale Halley and Richard Keating placed four cesium clocks around the world, one going east and one going west, and when you take into account the rotation and all that, it turns out that the one that went to eat went east.around the world lost point zero five nine microseconds well the one who headed west gained point two seven three exactly what when you take all the physical factors exactly what Einstein's theory actually predicted surprising, but this one is perhaps more graphic and relevant if you take a In the textbooks, almost any physics textbook that deals with this, they will usually talk about two hypothetical astronauts and we will send them to the star closest to one of them .
We'll leave one of them here with us and Send one to the nearest star, which happens to be Alpha Centauri, which is the one closest to us. If you go to the night sky, there is a star there, the closest to us, called Alpha Centauri. Choose that and in our imagination we will send one of these two astronauts, they were both born to print the twins, they both cry at the same time and we will send one to that star and back. Okay, now the Alpha Centauri ship is there. Alpha Centauri is about four and a half years away, a light year is a distance, a very large distance, it is the distance that light can travel in one year, light goes quite fast and in a year it is four and a half of those that far away.
There's Alpha Centauri, so we're going to send this astronaut and we're going to imagine that we could send them at half the speed of light, so they'll go four and a half away at half the speed. of lights it may take him nine years to get there nine years ago, okay, then that is on earth, here on earth, he will leave, it will take nine years to get there and in nine years back, you know in our book of record that will be gone 18 years. you're with me so far, okay, now he's on earth, let's take a look at his logbook, so to speak, he's traveling in the spaceship and it turns out that there is a Lorentz transform, it's a mathematical formula, it works for us, but It turns out that his good watch is coming back from this trip and when he comes back he will be two years and five months younger than his twin brother and if that doesn't bother you you weren't listening carefully, okay, in other words, it's his time. different than our time here on earth, for many different reasons, partly because he zoomed in at light speed and came back with me to dramatize this a little more.
Let's imagine we could have sent it almost at speed. of light 99.99% of the speed of light, okay, so its round trip would only take nine years, it goes twice as fast, right, so it's nine years, except when you return, it will have occurred He only has 33 days, so when he comes back he says: I sure wish I had bought some of that Microsoft stock before I left, is it Apple or your choice? Well, the point is their time and ours is noticeably different and the problem here is not the problem of space travel. To understand that time is physical, it changes with the acceleration of mass or gravity, among other things, making it a physical property.
Okay, it's not uniform, it's a physical property and it varies with mass acceleration, gravity, among other things. If you get into the math of this, you'll quickly find out. There are a lot of parameters that need to be defined to get equivalence here, okay, what this also means, by the way, is that you and I live in more than three dimensions, yes, we have a length, width in space, Italian spatial dimensions We also have time. That's measurable and physical, okay, how many dimensions do we live in? It turns out that 10 is a current estimate, more than three is the main point, okay, let's talk a little about the nature of God, is God subject to mass restrictions?
I don't think so, it's him. Does God accelerate or do you accelerate him? I don't believe it. God is subject to gravity. I don't think so, since God is subject to time. No, of course, I don't see. God is not someone with a lot of time that is our concept of eternity having a lot of time no no no God is completely outside the dimensionality of time he is outside of those restrictions and that uniqueness is his alone that is probably not true for angels either. the way in which only God is you is his personal imprint and that is what he takes advantage of for Afeni katesu message that is what Isaiah means when he says this is what the high and exalted one who inhabits eternity says, what does he mean by that he is there for a long time? , is outside this realm of time itself and that has implications for all of us if God has the technology to create us, does he have the technology to send us a message?
Of course, if you are curious, you will certainly receive a message. The problem is how it lets us know what the message really is. From there, let me give you an example. Let's say you are an undercover agent in a foreign country and you receive messages from your superior from control or your capital, except you are in the host country. It is discovered that there may be a spindle. To create synthetic messages, you are in your hotel room and you have these ten messages that have somehow reached you. How do you know which one is authentic?
How do you know which of these messages scattered on your bed really arrived? from the headquarters and it was not synthesized by the enemy, how can you know that there has to be something in them that only you and your headquarters know some use of words some clever trick is there some authentication method so you know aha, is that the real one? the rest of these are fake, you got, follow me, that's what we mean by authentication. Well, how does God authenticate this man? We have this collection of books in our lap called the Bible, how do we know it comes from him?
How many believe in the Word of God? the word of God why do you believe that well if someone told me or says that no way how do you know it's really from him how do you know it's not just a very clever collection of fables in something like how do you know? It really came from God. Well, how do you authenticate the message from him so that we know it's really from him and not some kind of fabrication or fraud or a collection of coincidences or something? He declares the end from the beginning and from ancient times things that are He hasn't done it yet, he demonstrates his ability to be outside of time, how does he do it by telling us what happens before it happens and I don't mean that with a few hours and centuries of anticipation gives us the exact day on which certain things are going to happen and he? describes circumstances that are impossible and crazy and yet they happen exactly as he said and the more you see the more you embrace them ascending, you begin to realize that you are dealing in a communication with someone extraterrestrial Fitz outside of our time domain and that It is so fundamental we also have another problem we think of time as linear so when we were in school the teacher went to the blackboard and drew a line from left to right and that and the far left was the beginning of something, the birth of the famous person or the founding of an empire what is the correct ending was the end of that there is a beginning in us how many did timelines in school how many of you went to school am I known so what we do because of that background when someone uses the The word eternity we tend to imagine what that means.
It's like a line that starts at infinity here on the left and goes to infinity here on the right. We think that an eternity has a lot of time which makes good poetry, but it turns out that it is very bad physics because eternities do not have much time and are completely outside the dimension of time. Let me take this line that I used and pretend it comes off the screen at you. Can I represent that type of curve with this curve? is coming out towards you you and I are at a point in time called the present ok behind us is the past and in front of us is the future ok the past is a memory the future is a hope we are between those two that is why it is we call present it's a gift it's a gift look a little play on words there I would buy you there sorry ok now look for us what happened is behind us what's to come is to come and we don't know what's coming but if I'm out of that line all together in eternity it is conceivable for me to be able to see all three at the same time, so to speak, God is outside the diminutive for him, he can see the past obviously and the present, but he can also see the future so clearly. since he saw the past now, that leads to another interesting conjecture.
I'll let you think: those arrows can go in another direction: someone who died a thousand years ago and someone who died yesterday and someone who is taken away three months from now. Now they all arrived at his throne at the same time. Wow, that should alter your 3D and 4D perceptions, but let's move on. I love one of my favorite quotes from Dr. Einstein is that he says that people like us who believe in physics know that the distinction between the past, the president and the future is just a stubbornly persistent illusion because he really had an understanding of the time far beyond most philosophers, of course, now you and I are sitting here. with a collection of books on our lap, we call it the Bible, we use it singular, but it's actually a collection of 66 books, and if you're still not confused, I'll point you out: it's actually 70, not 66, but if I said that on the radio would confuse all my listeners because the Book of Psalms is five books and if you break it down you really have 70 books, but if you start that discussion you confuse everyone, okay no, we'll be left with 66 books that work for our purposes and they were written over a period of almost 2000 years, according to our calculations, now the interesting thing is that we discovered that it was written by more than 40 different types, some say 44, there are some about which there is some ambiguity because they are actually edited. and together, the point is that there are more than 40 authors who bring them together over 2000 years and one of the incredible discoveries in my life since my specialty from the beginning was information sciences and as you study Information Sciences the information you get is a field.
That may be a bit specialized, but from that perspective I found two discoveries that changed my life. The first discovery was that the 66 books, although written by more than 40 people over almost 2000 years, are not there in an int. Integrated messaging system now, what do I mean by that? I don't mean there's a theme to what's old being true when it's new and all that, no, no, there's not much more to it than that, it's 66 separate books written by over 40 different people that I don't even admit by a long shot. time, but he didn't even know me because they spanned 1,700 years, but in this package of writings we discover that every detail is anticipated by deliberate and skillful design, the same words, the same letters, the use of idioms No, the text demonstrates an integrity of design that went far beyond the horizons of either writer.
Now when you face that, first of all, you really have to do it, you can't, don't take my word for it. You have to discover this on your own, but as you do, as you begin to discover examples of this, you begin to realize that the origin of that collection had to come from outside of time itself, it was not devised by Moses or by the big ones. ideas were not these prophets somehow they accidentally did not expose these genealogical details and other details no, no, there is an architect organizing this from outside of time and that can be demonstrated just by studying the text.
I get so tired when I hear one of these well- I mean, the Christian guys who write on TV say, well, you can't prove the Bible, but they should make some very positive point, but they seem to take precedence with this presumption, well, You can't prove the Bible. it just shows their own lack of information, they are uninformed, yes you can test the Bible just with this, discovering the integration of that design and that is just a matter of doing some homework and then trying to explain the origin of that design from another way other than Having come from outside of time, yes, it cannot be proven that the Bible and the author's fingerprints are all over creation and all over the Bible and they are in concert so we can explore a little as we go here about the limits of our reality because the message we are dealing with this from outside our reality and I'm going to use da Vinci's Vitruvian Man as a representation of our anthropic reach we as men how far we can go I'm just going to represent that through the in the middle here we are, man, we're in the middle of this, okay, and we're going to talk more about the discovery made by scientists that we appear to be dimensionally at the center of the universe from the mostbig to the smallest, we are right. in the middle somehow and now we'll get to that later, but there we are, we're going to explore a little bit tonight about greatness.
I'm going to take the size as a horizontal ordinate here, okay, so the things on the right are big things on the left. They are small, bigger or smaller than man, so we will go tonight, we will go to the right, we will go to greatness, if I can call it that, and the ultimate greatness would be the study of astronomy, astrophysics, the heavens. the universe that focuses our attention on greatness, so to speak, the shocking discovery of 20th century science was the discovery and understanding that our universe is not infinite, it is finite and if you have not studied it or you do not realize of it.
That is a big shock to any thinking person because we have all grown up thinking that the heavens last forever, we discovered that no, they are not, they could be expanding, but they are finite and that is demonstrable, now you understand. and most of these concepts are accepted for a generation, two or three, but this is one that has been defined, it is finite and I want to explore that a little bit, we know from the field of thermodynamics that there is something called thermal decay, you know, hot flows from hot to cold, have you ever noticed someone wanted to do that?
We have all experienced that heat flows too cold right, heat is something cold like the absence of it so heat flows to where it is is not right now if the universe were infinitely old the temperature throughout the universe would be uniform because the heat is flowing from hot to cold, so if I were infinitely old, all of that would have happened, in other words, the understanding that thermodynamics is that age is a function of that disparity. Well, since the Universal unifor univers is not uniform, that means it is not infinitely old. That means it had a beginning.
Wow, big deal, science is still trying to wrestle with that reality. Obviously they know it had a beginning and the way they explain it is that first there was nothing and then it exploded, and if you think that makes logical sense. you're in the wrong class, okay no, the universe had a beginning and attempts to explain it fall into a category of theories called Big Bang and there are four or five basic ones and none of them worked, by the way, that's part of the deal . The reason it's such a hot topic in physics or astrophysics is because every assumption you make turns out to be falsifiable, well it oscillated well, then there's a loss, there's an entropy loss problem and then you go on and on, then the problem is that they can talk. about what they think happened in the first few seconds or whatever they can't explain how it happened what started there had to be something that made it happen really well it also means it's destined for an end if heat flows from hot to cold and finally all of that happens and there is no more temperature difference, there is no more possibility of doing work in the universe, all work is a function of temperature differences, in effect, energy differences, so we know that it had a beginning and the shock is We know that someday, billions and billions of years from now, or whenever, it will have an end.
Well, now this is a reality. We need to face the Big Bang, it is what we call its beginning and heat death, the ultimate heat. Death is what is sinemente called the end of this and the point is that it is finite in a beginning and an end, that is something disturbing to face the value in a temporal environment. Wow, that's especially disturbing when you find out you're not temporary right now. part of you that has no mass is called soul spirit, call it what you want, it has no mass so it has no time so you are eternal but you are in a temporary environment.
Wow, that gives us some biblical insights, if you want, now you talk about it. Black holes in the idioms of relativity, gravity distorts space-time and as gravity is stronger in the vicinity of denser objects, space-time becomes increasingly distorted as an object with a higher density particular is reduced, that is changing. Time tries to get you used to that idea and crucial size known as smart shield radio space-time folds completely around itself cutting the region of space-time into the rest of the universe they call it a black hole, well objects can fall into the black hole but inside a sphere called the Schwarz-filled radius nothing, not even light can escape, that's why they call it a black hole.
This is a torsion or distortion, if you will, of space-time and obviously it is a topic of many theoretical discussions and you know some of them. these that are identifiable in the universe and now, surprisingly, there are some solutions to Einstein's general activity equations that seem to represent models that could allow loops in time that may surprise you and this is very much discussed among physicists, but there is a concept that I just want you to know that there is an area of ​​this virtual surface inside the hole that is a measure of its entropy or randomness, if you will, and if it were reduced, the entropy would decrease, which implies a reversal of time.
I'm just trying to stretch our I'm not trying to make a point here more than just a stretch, you're understanding a little here, time can go backwards, maybe we're not sure in quantum physics, that's a topic for the future. session but in quantum physics that study of things tiny subatomic particles two representations of particle collisions in the Feynman diagram are identical but the Feynman diagram I will show you here in a minute an electron and a positron appear when they see in a cloud chamber what They seem to annihilate each other, but that same event can be represented as the electron in a time reversal.
Let me show you what I mean. A Feynman diagram is where you have a graph of space versus time and you have an electron, a gamma ray, and it breaks up. two electrons and a positron that when it collides with an electron it annihilates, that is the way it is generally explained, okay, except that the same thing can be configured, the same thing can be represented in another way and that is that that electron of the left is in a time inversion. A positron is an electron and time reversal is another way of looking at it.
Well, look, the real issue here is whether we have a positron or whether that positron is an electron and the time reversal and a particle, physics will tell you that both are equivalent. It's possible that the electron went back in time, possibly we'll see now that there are all sorts of time reversal paradoxes in the literature, and if there are beginningless events and time warps, there's also a lot of literature about trying to alter events. previously registered. Okay, that appears and the literature in the whole time machine is one of the classic examples somewhere in time, a movie that was popular for a while, Back to the Future, was a popularization of that idea, the Terminator series was dealt with this whole idea of ​​time warping and so on and I couldn't resist showing them what has to be the most absurd example of time wars.
We have all encountered some of these in literature and find them entertaining. We all realize that they are not real. they are just entertainment and Robert Heinlein is probably one of the most famous science fiction writers and has contributed what has to be the most absurd end of this which is classic and basically talks about the imaginary story of it: a girl is mysteriously abandoned . in an orphanage in Cleveland in 1945, so far so good, huh. Jane grows up alone and dejected without knowing who her parents are until one day in 1963 she feels strangely attracted to a homeless man and falls in love with him, but just when things are finally looking up.
For Jane, a series of disasters strike her first, she becomes pregnant by the homeless man who then disappears, second, her highly complicated birth, the doctors discover that she has both sets of sexual organs, so to save her life they are forced to surgically convert her in a he, finally a A mysterious stranger kidnaps his baby from the delivery room, reeling from these disasters and rejected by society, despised by faith, he becomes a drunk and a vagabond. Not only did Jane lose her parents and her lover, but she also lost her only child years after her. 1970 she stumbles upon a lonely bar called Pops Place and tells her pathetic story to an elderly bartender.
The friendly bartender offers the homeless man a chance to avenge the stranger who left her pregnant and abandoned on the condition that she join the Time Traveler. At court, they both enter a time machine and the waiter leaves the homeless man in 1963. The homeless man feels strangely attracted to a young orphan girl who becomes pregnant and the waiter moves on for nine months, kidnaps the girl from the hospital and leaves the baby. in an orphanage back in the year 34, then the bartender leaves the wanderer completely confused in 1985 to enlist in the Court of the Time Traveler now the matter of the wanderer finally regains his life he becomes a respected elderly member of the Time Traveler Corps then he disguises himself as a bartender and has his most difficult mission a date with destiny meeting a certain homeless man in pops place in 1970 he asks who Jane's mother is her father grandfather grandmother son daughter granddaughter and grandson who are all the same person now this It has to be the most complicated conception, the girl, the one derived from the waiter, of course, they are all the same person and the paradoxes here are multiple terms of twisted genealogy, she is her own mother and father, etc., she is a entire family tree in itself, so Robert Upton and whatever, it's a silly story. of course, but it's probably fine, but I can't imagine anything happening, are we getting dumber or more complex, okay, I'm reminding people of the guys who believe in physics, no, it just takes you between the past, the present, the future, is just a stubbornly persistent illusion, I think.
I suspect that's Robert Heinlein's challenge, but anyway enough nonsense, let's move forward in a linear twist, we tend to assume that time is linear, we talk about the beginning and the end, etc., so over time we move forward , No? and we can look. Back we can't go back except in the silly fiction of these science fiction things we can't go back but what can we expect going forward? We don't really pretend to think that they are mystics trying, but the only way those future God Satan and his minions can try to simulate that in various clever ways, but we can move forward, look back, we can't go back and we are not very good at looking forward, so time can really go back if it could go back how?
Could you say it? Suppose that at midnight tonight time began to go backwards. So what are all watches? It turns out that it is not a trivial way. If you were suddenly bothered if someone stopped by one of my talks and you suddenly became worried. Maybe I'm in time reversal, how would you know? You can't tell by looking at a watch. How can you tell if time is going backwards? There is a very simple way to know. What you do is take a deck of cards and shuffle them. them and as you mix them they become more ordered you go backwards you see time it moves towards randomness time goes from order to chaos you always notice that in your locker at school or in the garage you spend a Saturday organize everything for how long the closet and the hall closet everything that goes from order to chaos that is simply life that is true in all fields of science it is called laws of entropy they have thermodynamic rules so if you saw a reversal of entropy you are going backwards in the time one way to do that would be to shuffle cards and if you did that and they came out in bridge order you would feel very uncomfortable that would be fine so the entropy of shuffling a deck of cards remember towards the order would be a reversible entropy and therefore time is okay, okay, well, come on we've talked a little bit about the nature of time I'm going to change slightly and we're going to talk about the nature of space and hyperspace is a bit we find the term throughout the Bible stretching the heavens we want talk a little about the structure of space as we think of it is this just a metaphor I saw the heavens spread out is that only a poetic metaphor work says who is the only one who spreads the heavens and salminen for spreading the sky like a tent curtain Isaiah 40 who spreads out the heavens like a curtain and spreads them out like a tent to live in Jeremiah says that he has spread out the heavens the Lord who spreads out the heavens Zechariah also gathers and so on I could go on and on in dozens of passages where the Bible constantly talks about The heavens stretch, in fact, it's worse than that.
We know that space today we know is you and I think of space as an empty void. You know, we visualize someone in a spaceship who has to go out in a spacesuit for obvious reasons, but we assume that the vacuum is empty, it's not empty, that may surprise you. Isaiah tells us that it can be torn. Isaiah 64, space can be torn, it can be worn like a garment, really something. hundredto Hebrews Haggai Haggai and Isaiah all talk about the heavens being shaken if they are empty, how can they be shaken? 2. Peter talks about it being burned.
Revelation talks about it being divided like a scroll rolled up like a cloak in Hebrews 1 and a scroll through Isaiah 34, that's a very important thing, if the heavens can be rolled up so that some can be rolled up, in some sense it must be thin and it must have an extra dimension to roll it, you can take a two-dimensional one. photographing and rolling it requires a third dimension, don't you see? The idea of ​​being rolled or coiled is an extra dimension, so there are some dimensions that have to be thin and bendable, so there has to be some direction. can be leaned towards so everything implies in this text that there are additional spatial dimensions spaces are three-dimensional there must be four four any of these things for an additional dimension to happen, so the properties of space that you know that you think that you can think that is empty You may be surprised to find that the company will talk about zero point energy.
The smallest point in space has ten to the power of 95 with 95 zeros after the herbs percent of a cubic centimeter. That is the most intense energy field you can imagine. Permittivity. It has absolutely constant and it has permeability is a magnetic constant, if you are a radio or electrical engineering enthusiast, you know that space has an intrinsic impedance, that's why you have antennas to try to match the impedance of space, it has electrical properties, It is not empty, it has electrical properties. properties, the speed of light is also associated with all this and they are currently trying to study the speed of gravity.
There are experiments trying to track that. Now the other thing is that light may not be linear. See the key properties of free space vacuum include permittivity, permeability, all these things I just mentioned, if any of them change isotropically then both atomic behavior and the speed of light could vary throughout the universe. . The speed of light may not be the same in the entire universe we are going to talk about. More on this in a later, later session, but dr. Barry Satterfield, his controversial observations about him was the first to recognize that the speed of light is not a constant and over twenty years ago, when I first met the guy and started mentioning this in some of our studies, I received the visit from Hugh Ross. and some of my other physicist friends very kindly tried to help me advise me so that I wouldn't get caught with these heresies saying that the speed of light is not a constant and I remember those days with a lot of fun because they had good intentions in trying to keep it out. of problems, but I chose to stay with Barry and it turns out that it has now been confirmed that they now know that the speed of light is not constant, in fact, recently there are many recent articles exploring the implications of that, but he is he.
The disturbing thing is that he identified this over twenty years ago and they don't give him credit for it, it's just the field of physics, we're going to the center of the field anyway, but he analyzed one hundred and sixty-four measurements of the speed of light and commonly called C, the speed of light, the speed of light accumulated over the last three hundred and twenty years, revealing a statistically significant decrease in the speed of light and, together with the associated C-dependent constants that include them, They are now measured with twenty-five different methods. It still didn't make these people realize a comparison of dates from an orbital time of history archeology archaeologically corals tree rings whatever with atomic dates or a variety of radioactive isotopes and it's bright about one thousand two hundred and twenty-eight points of data almost five thousand years and all this is exploited and our report on Genesis, the Big Bang and other things here William Tift is an astronomer at Arizona, the University of Arizona, and he has been collecting data for about twenty years on what is They call redshifts, some of You can tell that the stars, if you take a spectrum, they have a spectrograph, the stars appear to be redshifted and the theory is that the further away they are, the more they shift and that's what they call Hubble's law.
Edwin Hubble was the first to suggest that the reason the red shifted is because of the Doppler effect of expansion and that seemed to explain it for most of them and that's why they call it Hubble's law and that's why the Hubble telescope It's named after everyone, like William Tift. was collecting data on redshifts, as they are called, which are not red, they go in the opposite direction, there are some that are called aberrant redshifts and to Rick they seem to raise doubts about the possibility that the universe is expanding because if it's expanding, some of them are coming towards us instead of away from us, so some of these galaxy clusters and such that you also discovered are all multiples of a discrete value, all the redshifts are not, no it's like a violin where you can get the tone you want it's like a piano you can only get the key you press follow me there are discrete steps well, he has discovered that there are discrete steps of the red shift which implies that it is not a Doppler effect, it is something else that is causing it to be Digital is the point, wow, so if they are discrete quantum levels, it turns out that they can correspond to discrete atomic levels and let me derive everything from the change in the speed of light.
Satterfield was the first to recognize that if Satterfield is right and this could explain the quantification of the redshift that has not yet been confirmed specific values ​​of C or the speed of light govern the position of the corner emitted wavelengths and that would give as a result and and since this was originally put together, the center fielders confirmed that it is finite mathematically, so there is a stretch factor that has to do with the space that we are in and we understand that that stretch factor is in the region about ten to the twelfth ten and twelve zeros after and we are in debt and that has to do with a quark Cohen well, but I don't want to give you too much here but the point is dr.
Gerald Schroeder, the nuclear physicist, lives in Jerusalem, is a good friend, is Jewish, is not a Christian, but has written a great book called Genesis, the Big Bang. He points out that the extension factor is about the expansion of the universe in the neighborhood of 10. to 12 and that comes from nuclear synthesis and some information from quantum physics and takes the exponential expansion of that and relates it to chapter 1 of Genesis where day 1 is 8 billion years old, day 2 is 4 billion years old and then anyway the net of that is the 16 million years multiplied by 365 days a year, if we can use that approximate number to 6 and a lot of zeros after, and the interesting thing about that, if you reduce it by the expansion factor, it reduces to six days, that's what the universe built in six days could be, now it seems to be 10 to the power of 12, so see that as strictly an extension factor, the same extension factor of the expansion of the universe is correlative to the difference apparent in our minds for the six days of creation in which only God's clock was ticking Adam simply appears in the last day, so who knows, that's just one way.
I'm not necessarily on the side of this in particular, but it's just another way of showing that it's another way. to explain the apparent discrepancy to most of us, but I am more intrigued with what Paul has to say than with what Gerry Schroeder has to say in Paul's letter to the Ephesians in chapter 3. Paul makes an interesting comment: It says that Christ can dwell in you. hearts by faith so that, rooted and grounded in love, you may understand with All Saints what is the breadth and length and depth of the Heights, and know the love of Christ, which surpasses all knowledge, so that you may be filled of all the fullness of God. so here it is a devotional tapestry, except in the way he makes a strange comment: he says what is the width, the length, the depth, my height.
Did you realize how many dimensions there are? My goodness, is Paul consistent with contemporary physics? I realized that the universe has four dimensions. I don't believe it, but the Holy Spirit was leading him. He certainly knew all about it, so I think Paul's expression here greatly transcends his own understanding. If you take these terms in the Greek plot, two means the breadth it suggests. great measure length refers to the length as we think of it depth depth bathrooms that deep things like God's deep things whatever and the height of course is the height of the place where you sew the hoop, but the point is that these are the four dimensions that describe the spaces that We know what today the Epistle to the Ephesians is surprisingly sophisticated from the point of view of physics, which brings us to this discussion about hyperdimensions, that's just a fancy word for spaces that have more than three.
You and I are used to three dimensions, right? you can talk about spaces larger than three, but then you're dealing with what's called hyperdimensions. Well, we have just gone beyond Euclid. When we were in school, we all had what is called Euclidean geometry, which is geometry limited to three dimensions. Naturally, we already had enough problems that we didn't need more, but in 1854, one of the most important presentations in mathematics was given by Georg Riemann on June 10, where he introduced the concept of metric tensors. I won't go into exact details. Is it an advanced form of mathematics that deals with hyperspaces?
It took 60 years before a practical application was found and it gained application through Einstein's theory of relativity, which was the mathematics that made his theory testable and, by the way, Einstein came to his death. Frustrated, he achieved his breakthrough because he went up a dimension from three to four and suddenly the theory of relativity was developed, but he died frustrated because there were certain things that he could not reconcile and that after his death they were reconciled with successes in doing exactly what he wanted. made by ascending to another dimension Koza bowed in 1953 was able to reconcile light and supergravity in an integrated presentation and it was in 1963 that the yang and Mills fields were developed, but now they have unified the four main force fields into one interpretation. common is electromagnetic and both nuclear weaken the strong nuclear forces anyway, so in today's world they doubt from the year 84 onwards, there are all kinds of theories that have to do with what they call super strings and they vibrate in ten dimensions , the common understanding among people who deal with these things is that we live in at least ten dimensions and it fascinates me that in the Bible the only number of chains it mentions is ten by the way, but perhaps much more interesting than the fact that there was an ancient Hebrew writer called de noch mana deez he wrote in the 13th century and he concluded by studying the torah the book of Genesis, he concluded that the universe has ten dimensions but only four are knowable and he concluded this in his commentary on Genesis which was published in 1263 because I'm?
Mentioning that well, particle physicists today, I should say that the 20th century have come to the conclusion that we have experienced 10 dimensions, four of them are directly measurable, three spatial dimensions of time, we can measure those six of them are curved at less than 10 to the minus 33. centimeters and therefore are inferable only by indirect means clearly there they can prove it mathematically they cannot arrive at that so their four are knowable six or not so our physicists have spent millions of dollars on atomic accelerators to find out what not the goods concluded from studying is the text of Genesis, so there are only two types of people who can really deal with hyperspaces, spaces of more than three, those are mathematicians with special training and relaxation.
I'm not going to try to go that route. Well, here are the other people. they can deal with more little children little children have no problem, they can deal with it now Edwin Abbott was a clergyman at the turn of the century, he wrote a novel called Flatland and the little novel of his is a useful technique to get we can. I can't move forward if I try to talk to you in four or five dimensions, we would quickly not communicate, but Edwin Abbot played backwards by imagining a two-dimensional universe and we can learn from some of the things he did.
To introduce you to two people and I will ask you to be compassionate because these two people have a very serious disability: they live in only two dimensions, mr. and Mrs. Flap but I am basing myself on Abbott's concepts here and their universe is two-dimensional and if they live and each one lives in their own two-dimensional universe, they have no conception of the other, they have no way of making the transition, but they do see how a three-dimensional person. I can easily move it into their universe, which for them is a miracle, for me it's serendipitous, so we learn something that is something we can go beyond that.
I also have another ability that I can incur aproximity with each of them that is more intimate than they can have with each other. I could put my finger a millionth of an inch away from each of them, no matter where they were. I can enjoy a form of communion with both. Which they can't even have with each other because I have the advantage of an extra dimension. You're starting to see where I'm going. We can gain some understanding of the hyperdimensionality of this little exhibit here if I run my finger through its universe. You see, you don't see a hand, you see a point that becomes a circle and then, because you know, if you see the two-dimensional subset of what I'm okay, if a ball falls through your two-dimensional universe, you see a point that becomes in a circle it becomes a point and disappears they never see the ball they see the two-dimensional representation is that representation of the interference of that ball with them okay now, how would you communicate a three-dimensional object to a two-dimensional one? universe I guess I want to communicate that mr. lady. flat about what a cube is a box ooh, it has four sides, the top and the bottom, how would I do it right?
One way to do this is through a two-dimensional projection. I could try to project that box in two dimensions, but that's not very useful, you wouldn't be able to capture that two if I take a three-dimensional cube, excuse me, a four-dimensional cube, there are things like that and I project them in three dimensions, you can do this on the Internet and quickly discovers that they are not. not at all intuitive why did you start playing with it there is a three dimensional projection of a four dimensional hypercube but I didn't do it I couldn't do the simulation for a year it's not very useful in any case another way I could do this would be to unravel the cube In two dimensions, I can take the box and unfold it as if it were an unraveling.
That would be a way of trying to communicate a three-dimensional object to a two-dimensional universe. It's not a little uncomfortable. It is not like this? There is a four dimensional cube that can be unraveled and it is called a tesseract or hidden qubit and the only place I have seen this actually used may surprise you, it is the only place where I am aware of this. Act aside from geometry class, the only place I've seen this used is in a Salvador Dali painting. His representative representation of Corpus Christi is indeed a tesseract, it is a four-dimensional cube unraveled into three dimensions and I was surprised to realize that.
Salvador Dalí had that kind of mathematical vision to understand what he was doing here, phenomenal, phenomenal hyperspaces that we have talked about. dimensional spaces we have given you a two-dimensional example of mr. lady. plane from Edwin Abbott's book called Flatland and Hilbert space there is also a space that is an infinite number of dimensions that mathematicians try to deal with, but let's talk about hyper, talk about time travel, let's talk about hyperdimensional travel, what? it is possible yes I have a six-sided space here there is a six-sided space four walls top down to the right it is possible to enter and exit that space without passing through any of the six sides it happened that the disciples were in an upper room scared nervous confused closed doors closed windows nervous and Jesus appears right in the middle of them they shook understandably they thank you some kind of ghost or spirit hey guys, handle me and you see a spirit it doesn't have flesh and blood like you see me, you have I have something to eat my kind of non-Jesus person has the ability to enter and exit a six-sided space without penetrating any of the six eyes and yet he is physical but not limited to four dimensions mathematicians will argue that he has to have at least 10 to do that by some transformations, perhaps, but there is something very interesting.
Whatever it is, we'll have one of my favorite passages in 1 John, chapter 3, verse 2, and unless you have a background in physics, you probably won't understand what John is saying. here John says, beloved, now we are children of God and if we have not yet appeared what we will be but we know that when he appears we will be like him because we will see him as he is, I can show you a two-dimensional vision. representation of a three-dimensional person called a photograph a two-dimensional representation of a three-dimensional person well, what John says is that we know that when he appears we will be like him because we will see him as he is, we will not see a 9-dimensional representation of a being 10 dimensional, whatever it is, we know that when it appears we will be like it because we will see it as it is.
I think that's a statement that goes far beyond the physics of the average reader in terms of what it really is that the Holy Spirit is communicating to the amazing gravity and space-time influence of gravitational force and curvature. space and space tell matter how to move and matter tell space how to curve are intimately connected. By the way, do you realize that what we know about the physical universe is limited to a 5% sample? Do you know that they now understand that 95% of matter is invisible? They are searching for Earth. There are all kinds of theories, as you know.
It is there mathematically they cannot see it that is why they call it dark matter and there are all kinds of Astrophysical experiments to try to understand where it is because we only understand 5% of the total if you took a Physics course and I got five questions right in the 100 questions. What kind of grade would you get? Look, that's it, that's what should lead to at least some humility. The early scientists, Sir Isaac Newton and others, performed tasks in an attitude of humility before. God, his search was for the truth, we live in a culture in which the existence of truth is denied and any explanation that is not repeatable in the laboratory is rejected, it blinded us to truly understand, but anyway, the limits of reality now that we've moved on big side and explored some things enlarged nests next time we get together we'll go in the other direction we'll work a little on our talk about smallness, we'll delve into it a little bit into quantum physics and subatomic particles. to deal with smallness and we are going to discover something even more shocking than the fact that the universe is finite in the large, we are going to discover that the universe is finite in the small and that will shatter our understanding of ordinary things, let me give you An example: If I have a piece of rope or whatever, I can cut it in half, sure, whatever it is, and you can take what's left over and I can cut it in half, right? and you'd think I could do that. forever maybe not physically but I meant in my imagination what I have left I can always cut it in half well bad it turns out not to be true there is a length if I reach that length and cut it in half suddenly it does not disappear, it is in everyone parts at a time, it loses the property that physicists call locality and is 10 to the power of minus 33 17, that is very, very small, but there is no length less than that.
Anything that has a length is a multiple of that. It is an indivisible you. Call it quanta, which is why the study of this is called quantum physics. Okay, they lose locality. There is a minimum length called 10-3 semies. There is also a minimum time length of 10 to the power of minus 43 seconds. Time cannot be divided into a smaller size. That's the smallest unit of time you can imagine, it turns out to be the time it takes for the speed of light to pass through your iris, that's called a blink of an eye, not a blink of an eye, a trick to live, ooh, what could be about that, I think. there is a hyperdimensional transformation that we call the rapture that is going to take place, so we will talk about the linear assumption and a nonlinear world next time and with that let it serve as a final word, a prayer, father, we thank you for whom.
You are, we thank you for caring so much about us that you chose to enter our environment to become a person like us and yet with perfection and with the ability to demonstrate an eligibility for something we could never do and for which you gave yourself . in our name to pay our debts we stagger as we begin to discover how far you have come in our name we thank you Father for the insights you have given us in your word we continue to stagger as we discover how advanced we are I believe we become scientifically Your word is has been ahead of us all along We thank you Father that you cared so much about us to communicate with us and go to such extremes on our behalf We pray to you Father the three of you your Holy Spirit and through your word, you would help each of us to grow in grace the knowledge of our coming King, we pray to you father, through your word and through your spirit, would you help us understand what it is that you want from us in the days that remain as we commit ourselves without any reservation in your hands in the name of Yeshua, our coming King, our Savior indeed.

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact