34mm pipe you say

so a bib can break it, so let's figure out what a baby can do strength-wise and then we say right, we'll apply that Force to this and we apply that Force to the sharp subject and it turns out no, okay, it doesn't break, so we can answer that question as much as we can say, what force can this take? break crack what was that 25 Newtons correct 25 Newton meters at the distance of whatever is correct how much force do you need to break it then you say then you say who can break that and then you compare it to a table of how much strength a baby a giraffe has, blah, blah blah and the way you're going to get your answer that way you have to say which is what and which one are you looking for so in the Dell test we want to apply a load to it and say can it survive that or do we want to keep doing it until break, what is that fault and then look back and move on?

The bike does more than that or less than that and then you put your safety factors into the light, it shines well. I completely agree with the test of proving a true theory, yes, sorry I missed it. Also what impact four coils would have on your material of choice. Is it the same PVC as the original? It's not even PVC. We don't know which one it is. the stock is made of something else. I will try it while I completely agree with the test. uh, testing a theory. I don't think your results are categorical, as you seem to think, as categorical as you seem to think.

I'm butchering his statement here. not in uh I agree Dave, nothing scientific like I said, you don't know what that means and it still doesn't matter just when they started doing scientific experiments, right, you do any kind of experiment, the most basic thing is that you have to do it. I think this is going to do this so I'll try it that's science that's the basics that's backyard science that's the most basic way the fact is you're trying to use evidence to convince people in a sense that it's science um In a proper test and in a proper test, I imagine it would fail if impact was introduced instead of just a slow, steady force.

Well, number two, you don't have a slow and steady force. What you're doing is when we do tensile testing. It's a constant force, right, or it's a constant displacement, I should say, and depending on the material, the forces will change, but you can make a constant force and measure the displacement, blah blah blah, but the fact is you're going to push , stop, push, stop, push. And what is the increase in that? Are they always the same and so on? What you're talking about is Rest Force, but let's not get into that, um, but the thing is, a hit doesn't have to be a hit.

It's also a matter of time, right, it's an impulse, but whatever he doesn't know, it's obviously not what he's talking about, um two, so he says uh, instead of just a slow, steady, fast pace to indicate a pothole, maybe not, hit it on the right car. the kid pulls out your jam in the pothole on the right, any pothole, the jam on the sidewalk on the right, you can get stuck in the emergency stop is literally part of your test, okay, it's a real world scenario and the manufacturers Bicycle manufacturers should take that into account and then point out a fact. of security at the top, so it basically said here that it's going to fail, yeah, it literally says that a pretty big impact was introduced instead of just a slow city.

False number one is that it failed anyway, you don't understand that it failed, right? You imagine every time he hit. in that tube it expanded and got stuck the plastic tube got stuck, the other thing is also why are we doing this? We insert longer tubes to raise the height of the bike, you hit it once and it sinks at both ends of the bike. Now you have a bike that, depending on what just happened half an hour ago, also changes its dynamics quite a bit, you know what I mean? It's a fucking no and the thing is, someone told me and I didn't check it, but believe it, the tube, the OEM tube, cost six quid fifty, well the stupid plastic tube you got cost four quid.

What are we doing? This is dangerous. Do this. Do this. The other thing is that you don't specify what thickness of tube. What happens if? someone just goes to B and Q, right, they have something on hand, what if someone is going to be in line and gets it? I don't know if you can see it, he gets this shit, this shit

pipe

line, what if someone goes and gets something? That shit, what if someone goes and grabs an electrical conduit and they don't know I have a connector here, but this is true? What happens if it gets bigger?

Depending on what downloads you are using, you could get a little skinny. You download at a grammar summit, who knows, and you get 25 millimeters of this stuff, right? This is a very thin wall chip, this is a millimeter nod, it's PVC. I think it feels like vinyl, uh, electrical conduit material, what are worms? You understand that you have not specified anything because you are talking about shit that went away from the one that fits that has been fulfilled. This is the other thing. There is also a blue deal with your insurance if you crash. It's fine and the insurance company wants to get it.

They put out the claim any way they can on your bent forks, it has nothing to do with the tube, but you find out you screwed it up, what if it screws up your fork somehow right and you go? You will receive a warranty claim. I'm going to say no, that's not the right one for six pound fifty versus four pound. What's the matter? You're an asshole and yes the oil could have an effect so we don't even know if see what I mean. He said if it was an impact to mean a pothole maybe where potholes happen emergency stops happen so you're saying it I imagine it would fail fine, it already did, but is it even in your mind that you're saying it fails?

The oil could also have an effect. the temperatures are right if your suspension works backwards and on all fours backwards and falls backwards and falls backwards and falls it's a nice hot day, who knows? I don't know what you're doing, the problem is that he's so afraid to say no. I don't know, I don't know, I don't know these things, he likes to be the guru, yet he rides a bike. Forks to the side, well, no, this is what we are talking about. I was quite surprised that a piece of PVC

pipe

could hold up. so much deadlift the deadlift is not a thing, true and great, I'm glad you're surprised, stop showing people how to do these things, then you have to put something else in, you don't force the same mass by acceleration, so your answer to his metal working teacher at school was a former blacksmith, okay, and to demonstrate this equation which is not an equation, it's a description, he simply produced a reinforcing chisel from layers of old bricks.

Brick layer reinforcement chisel from reinforcement chisels with well expanded head and all. What had once hit him was a two-pound hammer, so repetition of small forces has more effect than a large Force. That's pretty funny, what the fuck are you talking about and you didn't have a metal working teacher? He was talking about damn elementary school, uh. I don't understand what you're trying to prove what does that have to do with mass times acceleration what does that have to do with it I don't understand what I'm saying is that I don't understand how they are equated so repetition of a small Force has more effect that a big one, no, no, it actually forces the Force, you want to get two kilotons of TNT or a two kiloton warhead and then the radiation screws you over, so that's really it? just nonsense, the point is that a hundred tons of tea, a thousand tons of TNT, a kiloton or a kiloton of warhead are the same, apart from other effects that have nothing to do with the physical pressure wave and the explosion, such as if that were the The point is that we measure nuclear weapons in kilotons of TNT.

What are you talking about? If you go and blow up a ton and a ton and a ton in all these houses, this destruction will be more or less the same, right? I don't understand what the hell you're talking about, if you hit a hammer repeatedly and it warps over time or if you hit it with a big blow you'll get different results, but how does that compare to what you just said? I don't foresee it, you're not talking about fatigue, why I don't know, let's move on, I don't think your test proves anything? Oh, that's good, I don't think it demonstrates the use on a fork, yeah, you're right.

Since the pressure subjected to the tube must also take into account the time that the pressure is exerted, you cannot exert pressure or false pressure, you cannot exert a force without a time factor, true, you cannot, it is impossible. I know the guys understand that, but we have to be a little careful with our terminology. A simple example could be seen with a blow on glass, where the gradual increase in pressure may not break the glass, but a strong blow breaks it, but they are different forces, so the accelerations are different. that's why this mass is the time of this cable we always hammer that I always repeat mass is force mass multiplied by acceleration in other words, if you're trying to compare two things of the same mass, forget mass, it's all about acceleration and Acceleration is just a change in speed from moment to moment over time, so if you stand still and then move or if you move through the air and then hit something and stop, that's a transfer of force. , as simple as that, where there is gradual pressure.

It won't break the glass, but a strong shot could break it since it has very little time to dissipate that energy. That's a good way to describe it. The material reacts differently, so when the energy is applied slowly, it is like a thermal shock between hot and cold water. glass and that is thermal expansion internal grain structure and internal tension that is a different thing thermal shock trying to relate one to the other is not the same because you are talking about energy, he is talking about energy to dissipate energy impacts, no It's the same thing, I'll give you the benefit of saying it, but the point is that this is where you are getting away from the point of this tube in shock, the crux of the matter is what we What I care about is the defamation, the spring deforms, but then it comes back when a spring deforms if you repeatedly act on a spring, eventually that's why they make you measure uh Springs on you, you just see the clutch and things like any valve spring, eventually they will.

They start to give way over time, right, you're just moving things around constantly and the atomic structure will just shake a little bit and the grain structure will just shake a little bit every once in a while there will be a little slippage, it's like watching a cliff fish now a little a little bit will just give away everything now that has to do with fatigue and wear and tear and things like weathering, but it's kind of like when spring will be fine and then one day he just got a Crystal, huh. just a little bit, it'll move a little bit and then, and when you add them up over time, the spring just starts not wanting to play a ball as well as it used to, um, where was that? um, so there's fatigue in that guy makes sense, but the fact is that what we care about is that this is defamation straight up and his test showed us that something was being crushed and crippling, fuck, all false against him , it didn't register now these huge scales there, but even a little kick in that needle, you know what I mean?

We're talking about that, we're in hundreds of kilos, right there, the smallest kick is like 50, probably um, for the fact that we can even take the scale, divide it up and figure out what. that little kick is the other one that stiffened and transferred the force which is what matters, there's no point in having a spring that every time you hit because you have to have those tube ladders still, it's at the top of the fork. correct and it is the spring that acts against that spacer on the OEM One, it stayed robust so the spring did its job brilliantly and this spacer is a gap to make up for the gap, which is why you would have to pay so much spring. okay and wait even though it doesn't have a spring it does have a spring so it doesn't really matter too much um but it's to take up space because springs cost a lot of money so you put that thing in there and it's probably due to manufacturing costs.

It's a lot easier and cheaper for them to get a place to find a million of these kind of stupid tubes than to have a metal, a company roll up some specific metal tubes and join welds and all that shit and then slam them shut, right? TRUE? It probably only costs someone who is a plastic manufacturer can do it for cheaper, that's probably what it is, as long as you specify, as long as the plastic can withstand the forces and as long as it is chemically inert towards the oil. and stuff like that, as long as it can live in its environment, yippee Kaye, motherfucker, but you imagine this thing is paralyzing, paralyzing, paralyzing, and this is a target, you imagine it's paralyzing, a grip on a grip, and your forks go down over time to the point where you can.

Eventually I won't get that damn thing out it's going to get so crushed and open up that you can't get the bastard out now that you have a fork tube you can't really get in there and get behind itbelieve it, did he mention that he is American? I know Thanksgiving is you, but I wish you and Penny a happy day, that's where you've had a terrible year, well it depends if you're really Gun Hall and I really Hate Russians, a fantastic year for you, it registered right away, they've been through a terrible year, a family torn apart by war, so yes, Rick, we all really have a lot to be thankful for for at least peace and security in our daily lives.

Thank you very much for your kind thoughts and words. I don't mind. The best test, excellent tests and excellent results. What are you talking about? It's just sucking cock. Pretty conclusive proof. Andrew, you're an idiot. However, is the tube subject to bending forces? particularly low Lord what tube, I don't think so, but it takes some pretty scientific lab testing on a bike to find out that we shouldn't, I wouldn't. The fork tubes can bend on impact and maybe flex minimally under hard braking, yes. flexes, but you have to remember that you have your upper and lower York that catches that little bit of fog with this tube, so I wouldn't worry about it at all, it's probably the stiffest part, it's the stiffest part of the system, uh, this is not it. was. anyway, a scientific test, just a little fun, fun, uh, the tube rests in all directions except straight down, crushing this tube rests against what the fuck are you talking about?

Maybe that's why they can't take half, why yes. take a heavy load, no one says that the tube serves as an analogue of the real fork tube, if you bend it, you hit something thatdid not move the forces on the tube during the test come from the inside pushing outward the tube was not under any vertical weight or compressive what we're talking about oh you're talking to this guy not Dell right yeah it was just a cover Basically it keeps it from exploding um there's a lot of comments here about the ultimate mechanics and physics of using a plastic pipe and the forces it suffers when it is crushed.

Comments here, no, no, no, I haven't seen anyone talk about it, I wouldn't have. I'm worried about using PVC pipe in my forks, let's remember that end of the scale that people talk about if so much force was exerted when you're in serious trouble and the forks will be the least of your worries, no, no, when did you do it? , when. Did Dell say extreme extreme extreme? He tried to calculate those points very well and take a ton on the front forks of a bike and you will be in the Sparks exploding if it's not a ton of force, it's not much.

I don't think people understand this, Tom it's not really a big deal because it's like that, right, yeah, you said well, the bike weighs 200 kilos, yeah, but you only have to accelerate it five meters per second, which is really not fast. . Okay, and a sudden impact like that that can go way above that, well, we'll go through it, potentially breaking the wheel bearings and the headstock, get out of here, you don't even know what you're talking about and maybe. Even inciting to the edge, fuck you, you know what you're talking about, wow, fucking retard, usual shit, great proof, you're a fucking idiot too.

PV PVC pipe is much stronger than people think. What do people believe? Enjoy the last part of the week, what is this nonsense? It seems I was impressed by how sturdy it is. I'm also going to try this little treat, let's try some other things, other materials and see how the tubes compare. I have the same solution. my triumph, well dundel, you have nothing to prove, the haters are the measure of your success, and the more you grow, the more they will envy you, this is very kind of you, the haters will always listen, I am sure and I believe that you do it well. sense of his deafness Behavior whatever is correct is like look, I'm not telling people to put fucking drain pipes in your shock absorbers for almost the same price and you have to remember well, you're damn, I'm going to cut that thing off.

I have to fuck around to make it fit when you can just buy the pan, stick it in idiots and you have to remember that he already said, I don't know chemically what's going to happen, yeah, if it had an impact, you know? like an emergency brick or a post, then I could probably screw it up, but who cares, oh my god, you just worked out the cost of the lattice part for him for decay, now go collect the fat paycheck, goody experiment, yes, why doesn't his neck fall off? these plastic things, damn, why don't you look at this scientific exclamation?

Although you can at least love the proof and shit for the skeptics, well no it wasn't, you're fucking stupid and I was one of the skeptics. Oh, good luck, thank you. Dude, thanks to you too, dude, this was far from scientific, just a bit of fun, but amazing results anyway, you can't read the results, you're retarded, you fucking idiot, this is an hour long. I'm so sorry, a factory front spring broke once. on my KDX 200 Enduro from some massive impacts on hill climbs and replaced the springs with progressive suspension springs and never have a minute to fix the PVC gaps, what would that be?

You see? This is what that problem would be. What would that problem look like? like um they sent but this is not PVC damn retarded and obviously I rode the bike hard enough to break the factory springs now this is the right thing some massive impacts and I replaced the springs it says it once broke I want to know what it is the breakup Tommy, contact me. I want to know what the break is and obviously I mounted the bike handle to break the factory spring, uh, schedule 40, PVC. Fox Business is nothing new, they are not a compromise, they work, thank you for that endorsement, an endorsement that I am listening to. a lot about Progressive Suspension, a truly premium company in the industry, is them.

I'll have to contact them. I'll have to contact them. I love the experiment. My only comment in the other video you refer to is that the spring solidifies when it runs out of room to compress this is known as coil bounce and is not the same as the suspension bottoming out. This practice should never occur and the fork should bottom out before the coil comes together. It usually only happens when someone puts too much spring preload clearances causing the springs to bind before the fork locks. I don't know anyone who has done that, you'd have to be a complete retard other than that.

I think the resistance of the material is fine assuming that the oil does not degrade, but you see that you have added a little, a little there, that is like saying, it is like going to the doctor, you have a tumor, in your liver, they remove the tumor and they say you know, no, cancer. I assumed that thing that's there on your scan isn't a tumor. We're all fine, see you later, bye. You might wonder: what do you mean by assuming that that thing that looks like a tumor is also a cancerous tumor? Actually you are right sir, good point.

I'll do a Fox sag test, well we'll see about that and the oil change on my trophy Fox, that's not that bike that measures 20 year old springs to spec. I would love to see that and correct any sag upon sag with some spacing I have to do I can't wait this is going to be brilliant you are Akin Legend mate oh my god let's take a look at this guy he looks like green grass oh my god he does look fantastic, he doesn't like a damn crazy man at all. I'll give you the thumbs up, you need it.

Fantastic mythbuster, no, he is not silent. Look, all the people in Germany don't know what they're doing in engineering, big physics scientist. Dell guy, I'm impressed, as sure as it is safe to use. I love your test results. I can't wait to do this. I'm away for the weekend, so I can't continue right away. Oh, if anyone has the inserts or any inserts they don't need they have them lying around or whatever, please send me their way. I would love a good collection if I could get them. Just hit me up on Facebook or message me on this um because I'd love to get as many as I can.

You know what I mean? If people get online, don't go kick them off your bike or anything. I think your Dell test indicates that the plastic has a reasonable strength to do the job you were expected to do without failing no it doesn't, you haven't specified anything, you don't have to guess what the forces involved are, it's just mass times acceleration force equals mass times acceleration mass could be measured as the weight of the bike and rider combined Dell said acceleration is also normal speed, sorry Paul but you are wrong, multiply the masses by the speed and you have the strength, so let's look at multiplying the mass by the speed, no, no.

I just said it's mass times acceleration. What you should have said: There is a change in velocity over time. No, this is a normal application. Worrying about you, you said that it is very simple. Number two: you need to know what the acceleration or deceleration is and you need to know all the time the time um interval there we go the time interval is that there are other forces and vectors involved no we don't really need to worry about them we're looking we're trying to get the worst case scenario and be in the correct stage, but it is better than the guest domain.

This could be used to get an idea of ​​the force involved when braking hard from a dead gear. You'd love to, Paul, at 60 miles an hour, there you have it, there's your speed training. to me, science shows all nurses, what a shame, what not, okay, questioning things, let's just educate Ray, questioning things, there is no shame in doing that right, it's like saying to a doctor, are you Are you sure this radiotherapy and radiation are the right way to go? It's like, well, we don't have a choice, you know, I mean, you could and you're not an idiot for asking, take care, folks, uh, just a little fun, dude, nothing scientific, well, stop showing people that you're literally Delhi, it's literally trying to change. in people's minds and he has, he said that, wouldn't you just slap when you'd like to slap trolls on the head fucking with a lump Hammer come and try it if you want to know where I live I'll tell you.

I'm definitely going to use the worst tube for one of my Divi 900s when I change the rear shocks, the rear is going to be higher than they were so I'll make the front about the same and see how they move. idiot and I'm going to cut that because it's going to be bloody, um, it's going to get me banned from YouTube because they're all fucking faggots in any way, um, yeah, so let's take the test, I can't. I think this is so, but as long as it makes sense, I'll look at it in a moment.