The Worst Jobs You Could Have in World War 3

Both the first and second

world

wars were undeniably horrible periods in history and one thing we can all agree on is that a third

world

war wouldn't be good for anyone, but what if the

worst

happens and we really see ourselves dragged into a well? I definitely

have

it worse than others, so come with me as we take a hypothetical look at some of the

worst

rules you

could

be assigned in World War III, but before we begin, on behalf of the bmas team, I'd like to express our sympathy for any. Affected by the ongoing conflicts occurring right now our thoughts are with you and you

have

our utmost support and respect, we will get through this together and with that being said, let's get started, the terrifying spaceman in the event of a third world war, hopefully Outer space seems relatively safe anyway compared to possible Armageddon on Earth, but I

could

n't be more wrong.

In fact, astronauts would have it harder than many people on Earth. Today, we depend on satellites for almost everything that happens. 1,100 of them circling the world right now and without them it would be chaos, we would lose our phone signal, Internet, our entire military organization and much more. Look where I'm going with this. Yes, everyone would want to blow up everyone else's satellites and In addition to the disruption it would cause at ground level, it could be fatal for astronauts, if a missile hits a satellite, the resulting debris can streak through space at a whopping 17,500 miles per hour, at this speed, just a piece the size of a golf ball would be enough to break the entire international space station, this would depressurize the station, expelling all the air into the vacuum of space, including the air in the lungs of the people, which would cause them to suffocate within minutes.

That doesn't seem like a good way to go, so yeah, imagine that. but with several different nations firing missiles at each other's satellites, there would be so much junk flying around that anyone up there wouldn't stand a chance, but even if this didn't happen, the astronauts would still have a very difficult time receiving assignments. By taking down satellite hardware, one of the scariest things an astronaut can do is a spacewalk. This is where they exit the ship with nothing more than a harness to prevent them from floating into the infinite depths of space to avoid creating debris and an astronaut might have to spacewalk to a satellite and sabotage it instead of destroying it completely.

Not only would this be physically demanding but it would be downright terrifying. Imagine clinging to a satellite in the middle of space knowing that one wrong move is all it takes to get you lost forever. What would happen if you slipped or, worse yet, accidentally blew the thing up? I can't think of anything worse than flinging yourself through space alone as your oxygen slowly runs out. Onerous operations. Special operations. Everyone has heard of them. They are the most highly. There are skilled and well-trained soldiers. There are special operations agents who vary by country, but all are extensively trained in a wide range of combat and infiltration tactics.

Trainees in Britain's special boat service, for example, are expected to complete a grueling four-week endurance test. on a 25 mile march and only one in 10 recruits make it through the Russian speedznots while training by taking assault courses under live fire, so yes, it's not exactly a scout camp, these brutal levels of training however mean that when are in the special field Forces really pack a punch after all the US Navy Seals are responsible for defeating Osama Bin Laden in 2011, as well as carrying out countless other high-risk tasks that remain state secrets today. In case of a third world war, these guys would be sent.

In the toughest and most potentially deadly missions the world has ever seen, let's say the worst happens and nuclear weapons are involved, firing them with missiles might not be the best idea, anti-aircraft defenses might take them out before they reach their targets, instead Of course, special forces could be tasked with delivering the payload in a more covert manner, such as using this mini submarine. These small submarines are used by Navy Seal task forces and can hold eight soldiers. in them with enough oxygen to navigate the oceans for 24 hours, they could be packaged into nuclear weapons. in the middle and dive to a depth of over 300 feet to avoid enemy detection, but not only would it be cold and uncomfortable, but you would also be maneuvering through the seas with a nuclear bomb hitting your knees and let's just say.

You manage to enter enemy territory without accidentally activating the device and destroying yourself into oblivion. There is still no guarantee that you won't be caught before you can complete the mission. I got nervous the other day because I had to take a different route. For work, he would be useless as part of a special operations unit. You know what you shouldn't be afraid of, even if you hit the "Like" and "Subscribe" buttons below. Everything is fine. Where were we? Biobomber theories of World War III generally gravitate toward nuclear war. but in reality this is unlikely to happen, the last thing any leader would want to do is push that big red button which would cause all the other countries to do the same, leading to mutually assured global self-destruction.

According to several reports, the Chinese government believes they are biological weapons. They are the way to win effectively and after the chaos that kovid 19 caused, I am inclined to admit that kovid paralyzed the world and only had a 3.4 percent mortality rate, so imagine if something as deadly as the plague bubónica which has up to a 60 percent mortality rate weaponized by becoming immune to vaccines and antibiotics, the potential destruction would be monumental and, if mishandled, could even wipe out most of life human on Earth. With this in mind, the people who create and test such a biological weapon would easily have one of the worst

jobs

imaginable, one small mistake and, wow, you could become patient zero for a supervirus designed to destroy a being. human in the worst possible way, although the creators would be the only ones with this concern: anyone tasked with transporting the biological weapon would be in It's also a big risk to say that your job is to take the weaponized plague from the laboratory to a military base.

Doing this without a war would be stressful enough, but with one it would be crazy. What would happen if you were attacked by an enemy? A bullet in the wrong place. is all it takes for the lethal biological soup to spill over and infect the entire world and guess who would be patient zero, that's right, even if nothing went wrong, best case scenario you would be responsible for the deaths of countless innocents. people because viruses don't discriminate between soldiers and civilians, so unless you're a psychopath it's going to be shit either way, but if you think this is all just a wild hypothesis, I have news for you in the 1980s, the Soviet Union actually attempted to weaponize bubonic plague as part of the world's largest covert biological weapons program, fortunately it was not used at the time.

Does anyone know where you can buy hazmat suits? Fight and flight a few years ago if you had told me there would be soldiers. flying using jet packs, I would have told you to stop watching science fiction movies, but in recent years, both the US and British militaries have been testing real jet suits developed by gravity industries. The suits are turbine-powered and can propel you through the air at up to 85 miles per hour. Right now they only run for about five minutes, but it's still enough time to get pretty far in a battle scenario. Now imagine that a full-scale world war has broken out and all sides are fighting. for their lives, if you had a squad on your side trained with these bad boys, you would definitely put them to good use, however, think about it for a second, you are in the middle of a heated battle, bullets are flying everywhere and you are if you If they gave the order to fly a jetpack over the battlefield to reach a strategic point to begin with, you wouldn't be going there with the grace of Iron Man.

The suits are heavy, you can't use a weapon while flying and it's still new. Less than reliable technology What would happen if you broke down mid-flight? Even if you didn't, you would still be flying in the open and becoming the number one target for all the enemy troops below, as well as the planes in the sky. I'm not good with heights as they are, but heights plus bullets, well, if it were me in one of those suits, you'd definitely know it by the suspicious yellow liquid that comes out of my pants when I walk past you, old planes, new war.

In any war air superiority is key if you control the skies you control the battle the US government is well aware of this and pours hundreds of billions of dollars into its air force each year, unsurprisingly the US has the largest and most advanced air force on the planet with a total of more than 13,000 aircraft, Russia is in second place with almost 4,000 aircraft and China is third with around three thousand, so none of the three superpowers would fall easily in a competition. Soaring, but what about smaller nations with less money? Not to mention if you're a pilot in, say, Syria or North Korea, when war breaks out, I have bad news.

North Korea still has active fighter jets from the 1950 Korean War, more than 70 years ago, along with a large number of mostly obsolete fighter jets. The Syrian fighter jets and air force are not much better made up largely of old beat up planes ravaged by previous battles flying miles above the ground towards the approaching fire in a glorified old tin can sounds pretty close to my idea of ​​the hell, especially when the enemy you're fighting is coming straight at you in a state-of-the-art fighter jet half a century more advanced than yours yeah, I don't like the look of those odds, there's no doubt that drones play a very important role in modern warfare and will play an even bigger one in a future conflict, but who is small enough to get in and fly them well, pilots are not two inches tall, they are normal sized humans, operating them from afar sounds like a job comfortable, assuming the base you're operating from isn't attacked, sure you're physically safe, but mentally it's a different matter according to Pentagon reports.

American drone pilots sit in insulated metal boxes with nothing but computer screens for up to 12 hours a day. six days a week and that's during peacetime, pilots are often not told the purpose of the missions they are sent on and don't have the camaraderie of being in the field with their squadron, they just sit in their cabins and look. from a camera as they carry out their orders which often involve slaughtering people, plus if they see their teammates injured they cannot drag them to safety, all they can do is watch completely helplessly, all of this means that the pilots Drone pilots actually experience the same rates of PTSD as real fighter pilots, whether shooting down key targets or dropping a bomb into enemy territory, one thing is for sure, piloting a drone in World War III would be tremendously stressful if the target your joystick is off by even an inch and you could accidentally fly away.

Increase your squad, damn, then it would be less of a joystick and more of a crushing depression. The craze of stick infantry despite the growing importance of cyber warfare. Conventional warfare will always retain some role in a global conflict if everyone's satellites are destroyed. Guided missiles won't do it. Work and the world will return to an era before GPS and the Internet, so, like the first two world wars, only with more advanced equipment, that means that if you are a soldier on the front lines in the Third World War, the danger will be on a completely different level, gone are the days of slow bolt action rifles where each bullet had to be loaded individually for short and long range attacks.

We now live in an era where snipers can perch unseen and use homing bullets that use tiny bullets. fins to correct the course of their flight, allowing them to hit laser-illuminated targets more than a mile away, but this improved military technology means it is much more expensive to arm troops than it used to be in the early 20th century, countries could afford to continue replacing. their fallen due to this, in bothworld wars, a combined total of around 30 million soldiers lost their lives, not including civilian casualties due to spending on modern equipment, although this would not be feasible in a third world war without a constant flow of cheap weapons.

Troops to use as battle fodder would theoretically be faster and more decisive. Tactics have also changed a lot. Trench warfare is largely a thing of the past, but tunnel warfare is still a strong strategy in places like the Middle East, which the Islamic State has excavated large tracts of. Underground networks of tunnels through Iraq forcing Western troops to climb up and face them at a disadvantage. They are pitch-black claustrophobic and one misstep could often set off a booby-trapped mine that collapses the entire structure. Fortunately, lightweight robotic devices like the Dragon Runner are now used by bomb defusers that can travel across rugged terrain and defuse the bomb remotely or take the hit if the bomb explodes;

However, if you're deep underground, a small robot won't exactly save you from a collapsing ceiling. There will be no light at the end of that tunnel. Brutal bases after hearing how bad it can be on the front lines. Work on a military base. Instead, it seems like a much better option. You don't have to risk your life in battle. There wouldn't be. any active mines out there and surprisingly you would get a proper bed, although in reality you could be in more danger, you see military bases seem safe, but in reality they are a big target for the enemy, colonel john a warden iii, a former. -US Air Force officer theorizes that a good strategic strike involves crippling five main aspects of enemy forces, two of them being infrastructure and military power and he guesses where you can find both.

Yes, in a military base, by eliminating your bases, the enemy cripples your ability to fight. soYes, you may have a bed, but it is a bed with a huge target and military bases are not the safest places, even when they are not the priority target in war, since 2009 there have been at least 30 shootings and other violent episodes . in all US bases, all committed by the occupiers, do you think a world war would increase or decrease the probability of one of these episodes? Let's see hordes of stressed soldiers, ex-military and civilians locked up with a bunch of weapons trying to keep their heads while a fury of war is outside.

I'm starting to like the sound of charging into battle. The horrors of piracy thanks to our global dependence on advanced technology. Disabling an enemy's technological infrastructure in the middle of a war would leave them devastatingly exposed, meaning hackers would play a role. One of the most critical roles in a world war because your actions can have some of the most devastating consequences. For example, in 2010 it was discovered that a computer virus likely created by the United States and Israel had been used by hackers to infect more than 200,000 Iranians. computers, the virus called Stuxnet caused one-fifth of Iran's nuclear centrifuges to go out of control and break down, crippling the country's nuclear program, and that was at a time when there was no war between these countries.

Wow, this was possible without the saboteur even leaving his office, but Wait, if being a hacker is as comfortable as sitting behind a computer screen, why is it one of the worst roles you could have if war breaks out? ? Well, surely you don't have to fight on the front lines, but rather oppose intelligence agencies routinely and ruthlessly. hunt down the most prominent hackers by hitting them where it hurts, right in their privacy, recently the FBI charged four Russian government agents with maliciously hacking into energy companies around the world, now their faces are plastered everywhere and there's no doubt that they are on all the major cyber sites.

There is a crime database, so international travel became a big problem for them. If they get caught, they can say goodbye to every one of their freedoms, and that's in peacetime, when the Russian government will protect them. In times of war, they probably won't. They are simply protected, they will be completely blocked as valuable assets, their government will want them under constant surveillance and that is, if they are allowed to live marked by enemy nations and practically imprisoned by their own hackers, they would have no choice but to obey their leaders states or suffer the consequences would literally become slaves to the system, so being a hacker would be less of a life hack and more of a non-life hack Morbid Affairs The prospect of spending years fighting a world war is stressful enough, but there are a job so gruesome that it has one of the highest rates of PTSD in the entire military and there is no combat involving the role of a mortuary affairs specialist.

These are the professionals who go out onto the battlefield and locate fallen soldiers. They identify what remains. They collect. their belongings and taking them out of the field to return home, this sounds pretty depressing, but when you realize that if biological or chemical weapons had been used, many of these bodies would be disfigured and almost unrecognizable, not to mention the enormous health risk In addition to the trauma of carrying your teammate's body for miles, you can also contract a nasty bacterial disease. Oh, and one more thing, mortuary specialists are sometimes required to recover their fallen comrades while the battle is still raging around them, trying to avoid them. a hail of bullets is bad enough without having to fight to carry a body in your wake, a future war, well we've covered some of the worst roles you could have if war broke out in the imminent future, but what if would happen in 25 years?

By then, soldiers from some of the wealthier nations could be fighting on the ground wearing mech suits. Yes, you heard that right. Incredibly, these 13-foot-tall, 1.3-ton metal monsters aren't out of the upcoming Avatar movie, they're very real. The Korean company Hancook Mirai is. responsible for developing them, to activate it, you climb inside the torso compartment, put on the strap and go, the robot's motion tracking arms imitate what the pilot does in the torso cockpit, while the bipedal action allows the robot walking over areas that would be dangerous for humans, this is simply a prototype, but imagine soldiers trying to use them in ground combat to help their units, they would be unstoppable, but wait, why would this be so bad?

If you are stomping around a battlefield in one of these things at all The other team will shoot at you and as strong as they are the mechs aren't really unstoppable and as you can see they don't have a high top speed so running away It wouldn't be a good option. The pointed rocket and cumbersome metal mechanism could become your coffin, but what if it took another 50 years until war broke out in the 2070s? Artificial intelligence could be advanced enough to deploy unmanned drones and other autonomous robots on the battlefield. The Libyan government used autonomous drones in Tripoli in 2020.

The problem with robots, although they can be hacked, you can bet there would be dedicated pirate robots, although it would probably be one of the scariest roles possible. Imagine being dropped behind enemy lines to disable them. The hardware of these machines, if you were caught, you would have a literal killer robot coming at you and all you could do is stand still and desperately play with your hacking device. Oh, I don't know about you, but me. I'm no John Connor, but what if I went even further in the future? What if a world war broke out in 100 years?

How would it be? Now we're really getting into hypotheticals, but technology would probably have advanced as much as nations. They could have massive levels of super-weapon space lasers at their disposal Seriously, back in World War II, German scientists came up with a crazy idea: a sky-based weapon that reflected the sun's rays back to the earth in a concentrated beam of intense heat without space launch capabilities. They never actually made the weapon, but with current technological advances, this solar gun could be a reality one day sending hundreds of reflective satellites into orbit. Scientists calculated that they could time them to reflect a huge solar beam back at the planet, which would fry everything. touches on what would be a nightmare for any infantry unit and would be almost unstoppable if deployed in war at least unstoppable from the ground our dependence on satellites means that in the 22nd century battles will probably be fought in space above them, especially if they can be used as super weapons, which does mean that there will be spaceships, but not exactly the ones you see in the movies to begin with, it would be very difficult to shoot a moving target in space, it is so vast that to cover any distance you have to go thousands of miles per hour and when you're going that fast it would be pretty difficult to hit anything stationary let alone something traveling at the same speed, plus the enormous cost of building and operating a fleet of spaceships means they would probably be small. -manned ships, so you would be up there maul alone, you couldn't even look out, the pilot would have to use sensors and gps to navigate ships around the world, so if they sent you on one of these things, it would be no falcon millennia, instead you would be shooting towards the enemy in a narrow metal tube without having any idea of ​​what is around you.

It's good to add terror if a single projectile were to hit your entire ship it would be enough to decompress the entire ship. Take out the oxygen and turn it into your floating metal tomb. I still want to be a spaceman. I think I've been scared enough by all this talk about world war. Which of those roles do you think would be the worst? Does it occur to you? Any other theoretical roles in future warfare let me know in the comments below and thanks for watching.