YTread Logo
YTread Logo

Roland teaches a master class for "amateur" media host Dan Bongino

Apr 03, 2024
unless you really know that I have." some people on my show who are not doctors or scientists who want to talk about greed and I go, I'm sorry, what is your experience? Oh, you read a medical journal. I wonder, but why what are we listening to? I'm not going to go. to listen to a mechanic talk about heart problems they are mechanics so there is this information here I have you I have you I am a little rolling I have little time I freeze right there again an

amateur

radio trick I have short time what that means is you're destroying my points you're making too much sense you used a real life example that you were involved in so now what I have to do is change my tone so now what I'm going to do is to start firing off a series of questions quickly and I want you to answer yes or no and then I'm going to accuse you of obstructionism because you're not answering the way, uh, I need you to answer because, uh, you know what you're making too much sense, here it comes, press play some stuff, okay, I hear your opinion, I get it, I get it. you're suggesting that joe biden may have lied about hbcus but that wasn't right ah you guys just caught that so this is what the

amateur

is doing the amateur talking to his right wing audience you just suggested that joebot lie boom that's really what i suggested ah everyone knows i'm too good for that i got it real quick press play joe biden then got censored by you guys? okay, but that was the example of misinformation, wait, time's up, get out.
roland teaches a master class for amateur media host dan bongino
I'll let you answer, but should it be censored by YouTube? Actually, you just said in this information. I never said that he said that I said that the NBC report criticized his support. You just said what was actually wrong, not even what I said. This is what NBC should be like. Oh, him. It's damn, he caught me, oh damn, he caught it, he just sat there and said damn, uh, because look, Dan said you said goodbye on live, no, I didn't, you said that wrong, no, did you? where did I say that? That's what happens when someone tries to use your twisted words for the purpose of their own agenda and then the non-prose people go well, chase them down the rabbit hole, boom, I froze, no, sorry, you just exemplified misinformation because you just lied, I never said that. y'all see how I try to change the topic press play nbc news what's right nbc report exactly right so they shouldn't be censored no no no no right I mean they should write truthful information fact that people should be able to so just to be clear , your point is that censorship is a bad thing and people should be able to correct the misinformation phrase.
roland teaches a master class for amateur media host dan bongino

More Interesting Facts About,

roland teaches a master class for amateur media host dan bongino...

Look, I told everyone that from the beginning. Dan's whole thing is censorship and misinformation. First, Dan refuses to acknowledge that the misinformation is lies and therefore what he is doing. what you're mad about is that youtube is pointing out lies and penalizing them, so you want me to stay within the narrow confines of your argument, which is censorship for misinformation and you are promoting lies and they don't like getting arrested for lies, It's called disinformation, it's called alternative facts what you're about to get mad about now is that I won't play your game, press play. I think I think that if someone is giving out misinformation and disinformation that needs to be corrected if an individual chooses not to, then you take any action against them, but you stand right there, boom, I just answered this question, I just answered this question, I said that you take any action against them, which means demonetizing their platform, which means deleting their post, oh, I didn't use this, totally.
roland teaches a master class for amateur media host dan bongino
I haven't forgotten, but we put up a post, it was a discussion we had, YouTube flagged us and said it was misinformation about Covent. We appealed the decision saying no, we refuted what the person said in real time based on my response in others guess what he said youtube you are right boom we lifted the block dan you didn't do that you deliberately pushed misinformation for your agenda I told you dan you are an amateur you were police you were a secret service agent and then you got to the

media

and you only got to the

media

in the 2016 race, poor dan.
roland teaches a master class for amateur media host dan bongino
I've been doing this since I was 14 for 39 years. I've debated klansmen over white supremacists. I have debated people who were in the black. panthers I have debated people in the nation of Islam I have debated people who are Christians who are Muslims who are Jews who are Buddhists who are atheists I debate people who are black and who are white all of that see the difference is that this is? What I do? You thought you were dealing with an amateur like you, but I'm a professional and professionals can sniff out amateur talking points and how you try to play the game.
Listen to how his tone changes and starts to speed up because his brain. Now he's shooting, but it's because he can't get me off my game, press play, so you're focused on strength, someone on your shoulder lies, would you rather put someone on your show that lies, yes or no, Roland Roland, I am I asking the questions? the answer is oh I'm asking the questions that's the trick you always use when someone has you on the run right now he's running for his life listen don't lie like I have you on the show I mean there's an example boom, I mean, let's be honest, I'm asking you a simple question and what you're doing is responding with another question to prevent it from being a really simple question.
Do you support censorship of people you think are lying? Do you support it or I don't believe that if someone lies if someone lies they need to correct the information if they refuse to do so then you take corrective action but you know, okay, let's make an example, let's make an example, no, no, I got it. a ton of examples of exactly you know, I'm more than happy to run through a couple of them right here, let's try it, let's do an integrity test, freeze it right here, okay, so they busted Dan Bagino in a lie and then he said, " Damn, I have.” arrested now made me run away damn, made me run said I have people all the time that lie like you oh you're calling me a liar okay bring up what I lied about oh well I, I, oh I've Damn I got some things in front of me let me damn I just call him a liar and I have nothing to back it up so I have something you had nothing so you just provided wrong information you said I have people all the time who lie like you oh I'm a liar where's your evidence?
You don't have any that's how you change the subject well no, let's get to this here press play so that the Russian collusion narrative that is Now a documented lie, we all realize was fabricated by one guy, Igor Danchenko, along with Christopher Steele, and we went through conduits. We know that the story was made up because the people who made it up have admitted that the story was made up. the people who told that lie over and over again this is their test of integrity. I'm going to prove my point here if you follow your principle that if it's a lie it won't be corrected, you should be censored. actually they should have the correct information if the information is false again they haven't corrected the information so

roland

they should have it if you can't you can't let's not dance that's not the answer why are we dancing here let's just answer if they should be censored they haven't corrected my information dan no I'm not I'm not dancing I'm actually answering what you don't like is that you don't like the answer I said no because you're not giving an answer you're doing this as a liberal thing that's so frustrating sentence right there sentence you're doing this liberal what's so frustrating is not dan being factual is not liberal or conservative is being factual and dan's problem is that he literally didn't listen see the problem is when you're an amateur, you think about how you want the answer to come to you, so you don't really You listen to what someone says and that's what frustrated him.
I literally said again that if someone doesn't correct the information corrective action should be taken against them I said it several times he kept saying I didn't answer the question I did answer I just didn't answer the way you wanted me to press play on the information it's been like four years should be censored or not, let me make it simple because you're not going to do it, it's been four years and they haven't corrected the information about collusion in case they are censored, it just seems strange that you have this double standard that conservatives should be censored.
You are an example and you say no, no, they should be given another chance, no, that is not true information, what I just said, I said, if the information is incorrect and it has been proven to be incorrect and if the individual does not corrects it, then Corrected actions must be taken to get that information out of the public sphere, but okay, how much time do you have? No, no, wait, Roland, how long are you waiting again? Four years have passed. Is there a timeline or can you just lie? forever and then again, with your own mouth you said you invite liars, which includes me, but you can't provide any substance, yeah, I just called you, good luck, you're sitting there all day, you're sitting there all day talking about me. on youtube and censorship claiming that people made you

roland

, I mean I'm just repeating your own words, that people should be allowed to correct the information, I tell you that they have not corrected the information, I quote an example from a liberal and you say no, no, they should definitely be given another chance, crazy, well then this is the game you play, oh, you said if you give them another chance, he doesn't say anywhere, Roland, you said they should be take corrective measures and that information should be removed from the public space, that's actually what I said.
Look, he can't concede that point because his talking point doesn't allow it. That's what fans see. A professional knows how to change his position or argument based on promotion. against another professional, but when you're an amateur you can only stay in one lane, you don't have the ability to sit here and stand on your tiptoes, the camera here looks, daddy can't do this, yeah, daddy can't do this, here he can. Don't do this here, this is Dan, right here, he stays in one place. Look, Dan can't switch to this position and he can't go back to left-handed.
He can't do that because he's an amateur, so he's frustrated because I. I will not accept the debate from him. I won't take bait from him because he won't listen to me. I have not finished. Press play. Draw another example. Let's do a Roland Martin integrity test to prove my data point. Then Rand Paul was censored from YouTube. A doctor praised. arguing for rand paul to be censored from youtube a doctor y'all rand paul is an ophthalmologist who is not certified that is what would happen if Rachel told me he is not certified but say rand paul is a doctor because the public does not he knows it, so they're thinking, well, he was a doctor, they're thinking doctor, they're not thinking eye doctor, they're thinking, oh, with the body like he actually is, you know, like a scientist, he's a eye doctor, he's not certified, he doesn't want us to do it. use that nuance there look at this information about masking and vaccines and undercover on youtube it should have been censored censored i was talking about mass teams talking about the effectiveness and efficacy of vaccines freeze right there freeze right there i said what did rand paul dan specifically say he was talking about the mass and effectiveness of vaccines, no that's an issue, what specifically did he say that caused youtube to shut him down?
Dan doesn't say it because he knows it's a lie and then he gets upset because I start demanding what he said specifically if one of my employees comes to me and says Roland: this happened. I would go. What did she do right? This just happened. No no no. I need to know, but what did she do? What did he do well? I'm just angry, I'm just angry and upset, no, no, what did they do, what did they say? You want me to take action against them just for the sake of it, but you won't tell me what they said, therefore I don't have enough information. to weigh in because you won't tell me that's the trick, I tried it, that only works when talking to amateurs, press play.
I just told you the effectiveness of the mass and the vaccines, how the vaccines did not meet the initially frozen criteria. I told you right there the effectiveness of masking vaccines. No, that's the issue. What did he really say? Did Rand Paul say masks don't work? Did Rand Paul say vaccines don't work? He's giving me the theme of what Rand Paul said, not the details, and he's there. I'm angry because I won't have the conversation with him until he tells me specifically what Paul said. Press play and Paul said. Don't try to clog and wait it out because you know okay, let's move on to an easier freeze. there boom boom dan what did rand paul say dough doesn't work vaccines don't work he got me he he caught me oh well now i gotta do what can i do he caught my ass damn the pro just caught me change of subject press play apparently It's too loud you're not really getting this stuff and it's very hard for me to debate liberals because you guys can't say it,let me give you a simple example, this is how it was complicated for you, I can do it. he was talking about the massive Arizona study, the massive Bangladesh study studies, you didn't read that right, so I can't get into that, let's get into something different, let's talk about something juicy, smaller, what about the media? communication that reported on this now completely discredited? racial attack that they have had, many of them have had since then they still haven't corrected that, should they censor the media to cover?
What happened? I'm asking you if they covered that, so he made an initial claim, no, no, no, let's walk. through the timeline made an initial statement they reported they subsequently reported what the chicago police said what the prosecutor said they reported does it matter if you have made a statement as an opinion

host

on cnn or msnbc about the truthfulness of this man's story and Now I haven't gone back to your opinion

host

and told him he was wrong, that's not a correction, reporting on the fact that there has been a trial or an arrest, that's not it Roland listens I'm kind of dismantling your argument let me give you one more let's give you one let's try to keep it simple because I have 30 seconds left 30 seconds 30 seconds Nicholas Sandman right we have a tape what happened there Nicholas okay Roland I got 20 seconds one more answer 20 seconds Nicholas Sandman should having corrected the Nicholas Sandman conspiracy theory yes or no Fox News literally said the lawyers don't really believe what Tucker says, they are on the same network so do they question that? yes or no, what are you talking about?
I wonder what you're talking about? Have you been eating groceries today? Did you think they were jujubes? Are you OK? I tell you to debate and yes, we have Roland. I have to go listen honestly seriously. note wait wait wait because I have to go I really am at the end I will have you I promise I will have you back it was fun I'm not kidding but I have to go I will I have you back, Jim as your number. I'm not messing with you, but I'm serious. I'm not trying to interrupt you. We are like 30 seconds.
Okay, Roland Martin, thanks for taking the time. It was fun. I'll get back to you another time I'll see you later Thanks okay people mention Mustafa and Xavier Dan tried to talk to me too much at the end because he saw what was coming you know what he saw what was coming I said wait a minute. I just mentioned talk show hosts who don't set the record straight and who lie. I told him that he works at a network where the lawyers who would defend Fox News. Lawyers who defended Tucker Carlson in the lawsuit say Tucker's audience knows he makes things up.
He's on record saying that when he comes back to a corner he makes things up, that's why Dan started doing a running man because he saw what was coming, Mustafa, I don't know why they sit here and first of all, they think you're going to put a professional with a fan like dan

bongino

every one, literally, i was sitting here watching a 35 mile an hour ball come at me and just waiting for it every time, i mean, he just wasn't ready, he wasn't ready for prime time, think. he was ready for prime time, but you know, the opportunity to broadcast the number was between you and you were brought to the mat, it reminded me of all these people throughout history who haven't been ready, uh, for, you know, when the time came, whether it was Kennedy or Nixon.
It seemed like Nixon wasn't even ready to be presidential, or you look at Ali and listen, or you look at all those people that Tyson knocked out in the first round and who thought they were ready until they made the move. in the ring and then they gave him that beating so you know he could practice and maybe in 10 or 15 years he would be ready to see Xavier again and what fans like Dan don't understand is if you don't have a well. -argument developed don't mention that to a professional look, I keep telling people this is like when people approach me on the street and we are somewhere and they want to debate and I play with them, but then when they I want to get serious, I put my foot on that ass and then it's like, oh my God, oh my God, why are you getting so serious?
You said you wanted the smoke, damn it, except this smoke, the fact of the matter is in every point. I'm hitting the nail on the head, what did he say? Well, I told you what he said, no, no, you said he talked about the effectiveness of masked vaccines, what did he say specifically that made YouTube take him down? Look, they don't want to. To deal with that what these right-wing conservatives want to do is call anything censorship when it comes to stopping lies. Dan Bongino wants to be able to lie with impunity and not face repercussions and that's really why he and other conservatives Angry, no wonder I'm now wondering if Dan Bongino was a black man because it looked like he was trying to be Alex Foley and put the banana in the exhaust pipe.
A trick for you, Roland. So, number one, number two. I think it's really interesting that they try to pigeonhole it with these yes and no questions. Yes, I have already programmed what my response will be, so if I don't get the response I want, I will make a decision. deal where there's another yes or no answer and I can basically spill all my misinformation on top of it, it jumped from rand paul to jesse smallett all these different issues that connect to the misinformation that he's spreading that cost him to be on youtube and the platform same uh and not recognizing that YouTube has the terms of service agreement you didn't comply with it you left you're upset and if you're insignificant Roland why are you in the program uh if you're a zero why are you in a program?
Why are you delusional as an American black man? If you really thought you were insignificant, you were important enough to try to become a target among your audience and you failed the genome DNA test, bro, uh, all me. I'm saying here's this and dan, I'll be happy to come back to your radio show. I'll come to your Fox show. You can call. In fact, you can bring Sean Hannity Tucker. Carlson. Laura Ingram. You can bring them all. with you because you see, I'm going to tell everyone at the Republican national convention, it was in 2012, we were in the media center like two or three conservatives rolled against me, then about four or five, then there were about eight of them and little Dana. lash she was here her husband was one of them I was like neo in the matrix with the ass this is exactly what happened I was like boom next boom whatever boom knock your ass out boom knock you out who else likes it? we're recording you I'm already on TV I'm used to the cameras boom just slapping their butts just boom boom I said whatever else they have so a guy said look look you're going to have like these these are these uh illegals these legal immigrants getting a driver's license from Texas food I didn't even know I was protected I said you really got in my pocket I said oh you mean like this one here I said man sit down again don't go near a pro if you're successful in amateur hour that shit works dan

bongino

when you talk just dan i'll give you something quick limbaugh really didn't have many guests on his show you know why because he doesn't have guests that's why Newsmax, Oann and Fox News won't have opposing views because they need it.
They make affirmation television. They make affirmation radio. Hugh Hewitt is not going to call me. That's why Neil Bortz, the punk ass of him when he was on the radio. In Georgia he used to criticize me all the time one day I hit him saying you know what I'm going to Atlanta I'm going to your studio I told him in fact I'm going to Atlanta in two weeks I'm going to extend my trip by 48 hours just so you can stay and do your show uh uh uh oh no you can't come, oh you can talk about me but you can't face me, I need everyone to understand, you should always be aware of the games they play and how they want to try to lock you into a debate on their terms.
I hope Dan Bongino and his people watch this video because it was a

master

class in how to be a real radio and television talk show host, because look if you all watch this, you might be better next time you have me, but guess what? what, like a pro I make adjustments at halftime, that's how we move forward, recording my uncultured video in just a moment, so it's time to be smart. Roland Martin does this every day, thank you. roland martin for always giving voice to the issues look for roland martin in the whirlwind to quote marcus garvey again the video looks phenomenal so i'm very excited to see it on my big screen we support this black man in the media he makes sure that our stories They are told to see this difference between Black Star Network and black-owned media and something like CNN.
I have to defer to the brilliance of Dr. Carr and the brilliance of Black Star Network. I'm honestly going all the way on a show that you I own a black man on the show, folks, Black Star Network is here. I'm a real revolutionary right now. Roland was amazing. I can't praise them enough for this platform that he has created for us to share who we are and what. what we are doing in the world and the impact we are having, let's be smart, bring your eyes home, you can't be a black owned media and be afraid, you dig yourself.

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact