Excess deaths debate 16 January

A warm welcome to today's talk, Tuesday, January 16. I have just begun my analysis of the Westminster Hall

debate

that just ended about half an hour ago in the British Parliament. Mr Andrew Bridgen is giving a keynote speech on

excess

deaths

so I am just going to allow Mr Bridgen to speak for himself in full, please give him the time that Mr Bridgen has suffered for his stance, he has been excluded and criticized everywhere, lost his party membership and, coincidentally, was offered a luxurious trip today. to Davos, which I think is a place in Switzerland, but he didn't do it.

He stayed at home and represented the British people. Now let's give him time, please, and listen to his points. You decide if you are following the evidence. Direct Andrew Bridon to move the motion Andrew uh, thank you sari and it's always a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. I would like to first thank the uh backbench business committee for scheduling this

debate

and the 17 colleagues across the house who supported this request for a debate. on trends in

excess

deaths

following my closing debate on October 20 on the same topic uh sary the uh the eyes of History are upon us every generation looks back in wonder at the incredible mistakes of our ancestors, they will questions like How did they realize how wrong they were and not how wrong they were?

What happened to them on Earth? Why do they ignore the evidence for so long? Your values ​​and every opportunity to learn from yesterday's mistakes. What madness captures men from 2010 to In 2019 the annual mortality rates in England and Wales ranged between 484,000 and 542,000 in 2020 there were 67,000 deaths 65,000 more than the maximum in 2018 in 2021 there were 586,000, that is 44,000 more than the 2018 figure after such an increase there should be a shortfall In fact a significant shortfall because sadly our most vulnerable and elderly, who could have lived a while longer, were taken from us before their time, but in 2022 there were 577,000 deaths in England and Wales and in 2023, 581,000, a huge increase when in reality a significant deficit and Hopefully the deficit and then some will have been filled not with the extremely old and the extremely vulnerable, but with many, many others who often They were young or in the prime of their lives.

You might want Tobe to describe the excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. to the virus, but that would be a mistake, that's not what his deathfic could say and besides, there are too many young people dying far from below average mobile from recent surveys. The excess deaths in 2022 have been more than 6% in fact in 2023 when one would expect death to finally fall below the average the excess has also been six% above these numbers are higher in the age groups younger people no one with integrity can stop worrying about these numbers, what is really happening and that is what we need.

Today's debate is an issue that affects us all, it affects every community in every constituency in the country and I would like to thank all the honorable and right honorable members who attended this debate today and I think we should thank the public . for your interest, which has sparked the interest of your colleagues, and I am very encouraged by the turnout in today's debate, which is considerably better than what we have seen in the past, not everyone in this room will be comfortable analyzing data and scientific figures. That's not my position. I was lucky enough to gain a degree from the University of Nottingham in biological sciences many years ago specializing in biochemistry, genetics, behavior and virology.

I admit, yes, it is a very important debate to have in 2022. I saw almost as many excess deaths across the UK as during the Blitz and in my own region of Yorkshire every year since the pandemic, we have had excess deaths and I am very concerned about this, but what they are also concerned about is almost a deafening silence from the NHS about what is causing this, why it is happening and what they are doing to alleviate it, so I thank the honorable gentleman for bringing this very important debate today and only by talking about it can we get to the root cause of what the problem is because clearly there is a problem, that is the goal of a representative democracy.

We are here to raise issues on behalf of our constituents and look out for their best interests at all times. I thank the Honorable gentleman for his assistance. but we had enough signatures for a three-hour debate in the main chamber, we are actually having a 90-minute debate in Westminster Hall, which I mentioned to the chair of the backbench business committee and felt it was a bit insulting given the seriousness . of the topic we are discussing uh to those who have lost loved ones in recent years and I would also like to thank you for giving and you are right to point out that there is considerable concern about this issue. and because of that concern, do you agree with me that we should use the most accurate data available and an age-standardized mortality rate data set that takes into account population growth and population aging?

Of course, we should use the most accurate figures we have, and later in the speech near the end I will talk about the data we really want that could settle this issue once and for all. Beyond a reasonable doubt, so I thank the public. for your pressure and your interest in these statistics and I thank the people who attended today in person and the thousands and thousands who will watch on television or online. There is a burning question at the center of this debate. After the excess deaths there should be a deficit. Where is the expected deficit? when we will have it and, even worse, why the deficit is not covered but significantly exceeded and why the institutions whose job it is to notice these matters record these matters to publish them and draw attention to these matters, why apparently everyone Are they asleep at the wheel? and the second burning question I'll get to first is why no one is listening to those raising the alarm provided by the research and analysis of two of Britain's most trusted doctors.

With alarming clarity only this week, Sary, the director of the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, Professor Carl Henan reviewed the causes of excess deaths and concluded that they are predominantly related to cardiovascular diseases, told the newspaper Sunday Express that this cannot be explained. due to population growth due to covid or due to the aging of the population, consultant cardiologist Dr. Malhotra, a world expert in the causes of heart disease, also told TNT radio yesterday that, although cardiovascular diseases are multifactorial, They top the list in the hierarchy of causes behind excess. heart related deaths have to be the experimental covid mRNA vaccine until proven otherwise and this is not speculative.

No, I do not yield to this, but let me finish this attempt and I will give way to the Honorable gentleman. This is not speculative, but based on the highest level of data combining plausible biological mechanisms randomized control trials high quality observational data pharmacovigilance data autopsy data and clinical data and those who choose not to acknowledge these cold, hard facts cold and hard Mr. HRH ignores the evidence intentionally blind or lack of awareness, I will give way to the Honorable gentleman. I'm very grateful to the member for relenting and I'm grateful for him uh highlighting this important debate about excess deaths, but I'm looking forward to understanding. the difference between Co correlation and causation because there is a correlation between eating ice cream and sunburn, but we don't necessarily assume the two are together, it could be sunny weather, the same goes for this case, does it have to do with the fact that it is blocked? to do with late presentation access to the NHS, these are the key points to try to understand causality and correlation to understand why these numbers are so high.

I agree with the honorable gentleman, he is a doctor so he clearly has some knowledge, but Correlation is not causation, but correlation is an alarm. Cigarettes and alarm bells ring throughout the building, but no one wants to open the door and see if there is a fire. I think future generations will ridicule us for what we do. We just did in response to a seasonal airborne virus, apparently lost our Collective Minds, we have imposed a new type of quarantine on a healthy population, flouting previous Public Health advice for the entire public, flouting our own pandemic plan carefully prepared by experts.

In flagrant violation of the sound and experienced advice of many professionals, those noble dentists are inevitably being vindicated one by one, so that when the repressed and embarrassing evidence of the real world finally emerges, I will not mention those who harass, discredit and ridicule to the dentists who loudly flaunted their selfish virtue on social media, in the press and on television. I know exactly what bullying feels like and we inflict social distancing masking and school closures on healthy children without risk of contracting the virus. We did this to protect adults at the expense. of our children and their social and mental health people raised the SAR alarm but no one listened a society that consciously and consciously sacrifices perfectly healthy children for adults is sick in itself our era this time will not be an era that is well regarded by the Generations Future, that is, it is going to be our Legacy and I call on this house and those in authority to write this grave error and write it quickly with unbearable cruelty, we isolate even those who would have gladly made the individual decision to see their grandchildren and, worst of all, we overlook them all. the procedures, all the protocols and all the science to inflict on a healthy population a new, untested product that had never before been used outside of clinical trials, much less approved, there was no long-term safety data, the analysis of Safety in the trials was eight weeks. and then the control group was vaccinated without age stratification for recipients of an experimental drug for a disease with an average mortality age of 82 years without liability under any circumstances for the manufacturers of these experimental treatments plus there were good reasons based on the known science at the time these products could be harmful ridiculous future generations may come to hate us we will forever be the poster boys and girls of a society that collectively lost its mind and lost its moral compass will hang this millstone around our necks for eternity and What is the defect of this human nature that clings to things and destroys everything before it?

Some have called it the madness of the crowds or a kind of mass formation psychosis, the kind of thing that allowed China to commit population Armageddon with the one-child policy. for decades, the kind of thing that allowed us to cull millions upon millions of cattle during the apparent outbreak of foot and mouth disease, where we were persuaded not by science but by plausible talk from demonstrable idiots like Professor Neil Ferguson, yes, same thing took his advice. to bankruptcy, am misiz and the utter desperation of countless farmers forced to destroy their own livelihoods in a futile attempt to prevent the spread of an airborne virus, a virus that had already managed to pass through the air from France to the hallway. in white, so how many times must so-called experts be caught literally with their pants down while their models fail yet again?

How long should we be subject to discrediting Dil being thrown into our political discourse? How long must decision makers deal with discredited models and dying, captured institutions and why does no one listen to reason when they have been proven wrong so many times and there are many other examples in medicine, from bloodletting with leeches to pointless lobotomies and not washing hands between death and the delivery room. Doctors and scientists are far from immune to groupthink and today's group lives the truth. At that point I give way to The Honorable Gentlemen and this will not be the first or I suspect it will be the last government in history that does not follow the evidence when it comes to difficulties, but when governments make mistakes and protect themselves and do not look at the evidence, we as a Democratic Society should expect that there will be an inquiry establishing what has happened and what should have happened and what should happen in the future Does the Honorable gentleman agree with me that the inquiry we have established is not meeting your task to do that job and assume that the blocking was correct from the beginning?

I thank the honorable gentleman for that. intervention and I totally agree with him, this is not a political question, it is a question ofpublic health that should affect all voters in the chamber. I think we know that So-Cal Co's investigation has already presented the answers it wants. Getting there has all the appearance of a cover-up and it was clearly deeply disappointing this week when they announced that the module relating to the safety and efficacy of vaccines had been postponed indefinitely until after the next general election, which is extremely disappointing and another example I could talk about is that I can educate every public and media body I can think of in 2014 to tell them over and over again that the subpostmasters were innocent, but no one listened and I knew that the subpostmasters in my constituency were completely honest, anyone who knew these pillars of society knew this, the innocent were falsely accused of dishonesty in the Over the Horizon scandal and were relentlessly persecuted by a ruthless, mendacious and malicious bureaucracy, and it is the coldness that surprises most HRHs, the imperious arrogance of the ruthless that captures institutions and cowards in Authority when a single narrative closes our Collective Minds to the Nuances to experience the uncomfortable truths no one listened to the subpostmasters no one cared no one in no one in power moved a muscle to help, but now, suddenly a media program has changed The Narrative to reveal that the experts were wrong, that the institutions were wrong, that those in the Authority were wrong and that an infallible computer system was of fallible fact, even our justice system got it so tragically wrong with thousands of court hearings and If judges make wrong judgments, lessons will be learned from the post office about covid madness, so who is really dying now?

Well, it's not the old and frail ones as it was with Co. In fact, dementia deaths, a key benchmark of elderly deaths, have been in deficit ever since. Covid and what we would expect after a period of high mortality, instead, particularly for cardiovascular deaths, there has been relentless, weak and weak excess mortality, for months and months in the young and middle-aged, all age groups. age are affected, but the 50-64 age group has I had it worse and will declare an interest. There have been 12% more deaths than usual in 2022, 133% in 2022, 23 and at least five out of six of those deaths this year have nothing to do with covid.

Whatever it may be, my constituent Steven Miller was a healthy computer engineer in his 40s, received two doses of Astroic Jabs in the summer of 2021 and soon after became ill, his side effects were so severe that he lost his job and in November In 2021 he was taken urgently. hospital and now has cardiomyopathy and ventricular failure with a maximum of 5 years to live which will take him until 2026 unless he has a heart transplant and when I last saw him he had a heart rate of 145 beats per minute and subsequently He lost his partner and access to his son and is at risk of losing his home.

He now has a diagnosis from Glenfield Hospital in Leicester of vaccine induced cardiomyopathy and I will help him try to get compensation but he is just an example of one of my constituents who is probably going to have 30 years of his life stolen from him his son will lose his father How can £120,000 compensation be enough for that? And honorable friend. I will definitely do it. I am very grateful to my honorable friend for introducing this debate. coherently, but would you be able to explain why mod four of the public inquiry into the safety of these vaccines has been arbitrarily postponed from next July?

Surely what Casey mentions highlights the need for an urgent investigation into this. My honorable friend is absolutely right to raise that question, why would they put any investigation into the public inquiry? I think it is costing a few hundred million pounds and should therefore be in the public interest. They would return that debate indefinitely. I'm afraid there has been political pressure on the investigation. There is clearly a lot of political capital in the run-up to the next election that has been put into the fact that the government and opposition party support did the right thing in our response to the pandemic, including the rollout of the vaccines .

I think the very fact that they did this indicates that there is something to hide and should make the public very suspicious and I will talk about that shortly. For two years we turned society upside down so as not to, in quotes, kill Grandma now that Mom and Dad are dying, it seems like no one cares, this is Alice in Wonderland. Thinking of people in their 50s and 60s, I declare to be interested again, I usually have more, many more years of active contribution, I hope, and deeply satisfying lives to live. These are the people most affected, furthermore, the raw number of lives lost is not the only measure we can consider, we have better methods, the most famous method is known as quality-adjusted life years, those who understand public health generally refer to These are the ones that rate the years of healthy life lost according to the most sensible metric to adequately evaluate the impacts of deaths on lives lost in families and society.

The Coles were ignored from the start, they were ignored in July 2020 when the government's own assessment was that lockdowns would reduce millions of years they were ignored when they decided to inject young people with experimental vaccines despite the refusal of the joint committee on vaccination and immunization to recommend vaccination for under-15s in September 2021, including in the co-inquiry when the Prime Minister attempted to raise the issue of quality-adjusted life years. The Council of Hugo Keith King, the lead attorney for the joint investigation, shouted him down and then revealed his incredible, unforgivable negligence and ignorance by saying, "I don't want to get into life." Quality of life guarantee models.

Again, this is the most senior lawyer in the so-called investigation Co, so when I say that future generations are all ridiculous, it is not difficult to see the reasons for the pandemic after which some of our best academics from around the world they questioned. The start on published, peer-reviewed articles is over, the crisis has passed, but still the vessels continue to drown out the intelligent, reasoned discourse of experts. Not knowing what AAL means is one thing, but flaunting your ignorance with arrogant disdain should disqualify Mr. Keith from any further involvement. in that research, and sadly, your condescending disdain for open research epitomizes what many of us have encountered time and time again in raising these questions: we have seen a smaller pool of fanciful excuses seized upon for the rise in heart attacks, for example. which Chris cleverly claimed that there was a reduction in statin prescriptions even though the prescription levels were exactly the same and it would take years or even decades for changes on that issue to take effect and be seen in the mortality data of the population, the Tri meter would persuade us people who ate eggs or the wrong type of breakfast or climate change.

People are tired of being patronized by these lies. Some have claimed that the excess deaths are due to Covid. The liter is full of studies claiming that Covid causes heart disease. Almost all of them include Covid cases from spring 2020. It was almost impossible to get tested and become an official case unless you were sick and in the hospital, so Gary shows that sick people get heart disease more than people Healthy does not mean that Covid causes heart disease, in fact the claims can be easily debunked. We've seen a sharp rise in both Australia and Singapore, as well as the UK, and these countries didn't have any significant Covid until 2022, but they rolled out Jabs at exactly the same time as us in the UK.

Correlation does not prove the causality we have had. I already heard it in this debate, but correlation with and without covid can rule out causation. The excess cardiac deaths were certainly not caused by Covid. Some have claimed that the excess deaths were caused by the lockdowns. Well, it is well known that psychological stress increases the risk of heart disease. The government subjected Ed's people to a massive fear propaganda campaign, well documented by Laura Dodsworth in her book State of Fear. We were isolated from our usual support networks. For many, we saw immense financial pressures. Such policies could contribute to heart disease in a child.

However, the steepest rise came later, coinciding entirely with the jab rollouts, so we have a clear temporal link between the rise in deaths and vaccination and some Cl CL that the excess cannot be due to the jabs because Sweden has not had so many excesses. deaths as elsewhere despite having a very similar number of doses per million of experimental vaccines, but it is important to understand that heart disease is a cumulative risk. In the UK we already had a serious problem with heart disease before the pandemic and it has gotten much worse. uh after the vaccine rollout and conversely Sweden has the longest healthy life expectancy in Europe no wonder they are a statistical outlier in excess deaths now if you're under 50 and If you live in Sweden, your chances of dying from heart disease were already half that of a UK resident of the same age; some have admitted the problem, but claimed it was worth it.

Science journalist Tom Chivers even said that pricking children sounds cruel, but a small number of deaths would be worth it, as I pointed out. Previously, from China to the UK, any culture willing to openly sacrifice children for adults is rotten in my opinion to the core and look what is happening now is that we are again seeing a spike in covid hospitalizations that we should have when we should be. If a Corona virus is expected in January, the number of infected people and the number of admissions to intensive care were approximately the same every six months before and after the vaccines.

The number of intensive care admissions in the January-June 2020 wave was approximately the same as in the July-December 2020 covid wave and remains similar in the January-June 2021 covid wave and in the covid wave from July to December 2021, the vaccine therefore had no impact and those interested can refer to a recent article in the journal of clinical medicine which demonstrates exactly this point and the next important factor is that Omicron It is much less deadly. The reason there are fewer Covid deaths now is because of the arrival of Omicron in early 2022, but viral waves will continue to come and go until almost everyone has post-infection immunity. and we are not there yet, it is clear that the viral waves were not affected by the lockdowns.

It is increasingly clear that they were not affected by the blows. People have denied that viral waves naturally peak at predictable times of year, but how much longer can that be denied? lockdowns did not cause deaths to decline from their peaks in April 2020 because they also peaked and fell in April 2022 and March 2023 without lockdowns, in fact in 2020 infections were already declining even before the lockdowns began lockdowns, the real problem with excess deaths began in spring. 2021 with the rollout of the vaccine and there was a gradual increase in ambulance calls for life-threatening emergencies at exactly the same time that hospitals began to be overwhelmed for the first time as well and the number of people who could not work due to long-term illnesses. to run increase even calls for help from planes Rose, should we think that all this is a coincidence?

When do we really know that these injections cause a variety of serious adverse events, especially cardiac events? Now the excess of deaths is the tip of this ugly thing. Iceberg and we have not even mentioned the scandal that shakes the world of pricking people who had already had covid, which in one fell swoop almost completely demolishes the credibility of our public health policies in this period, IMM we completely ignore natural immunity which a fact should It may be a red flag of gigantic proportions, but no one is listening to me and I have no time to discuss the fact that the jab was not withdrawn when it became clear that an incredible 1 in 800 doses administered caused serious adverse effects and consequences: the Rota virus. vaccine was completely withdrawn after causing an adverse event rate of one in 10,000 for the 2009 swine flu vaccine, it was an adverse event rate of one in 35,000that were harmed and that was later taken off the market, the covid vaccine is still being pushed and is seriously harming people inevitably at a rate much higher than one in 800 because most people are exposed to multiple doses of the vaccine with the same risk of adverse events in each dose treatment for syphilis with thalidomide all these infamous pains devastating medical scandals are overshadowed by Under the iceberg, under the water, is the medical scandal we are currently experiencing with the so-called experimental vaccines against covid-19 and 11 years had to pass since the drug was withdrawn in 1961 for thalidomide.

The scandal was first raised in Parliament 11 years after the This scandal before the word thalidomide could even be mentioned in the chamber of the House of Commons, well, I'm not going to let that happen this time, for That's why I fought so hard to raise this issue in Parliament at the cost of my reputation, my career and the financial security of my family, the public inquiry should look into this issue urgently, instead they are wasting taxpayers' money by accessing through WhatsApp messages while people die, as if that wasn't bad enough, I already shared it with you.

This week we learned that the vaccine module has been postponed indefinitely for no good reason. It's like the research is so desperate not to find fault that they can't even see what happened with the vaccines. We need transparency. Dr Clare Craig, Co-Chair. of the Heart Group has been doggedly pursuing the UK's Health Security Agency for its record-level data on dose dates and deaths for a year. These are the data that could solve this problem once and for all. They admit they have it. Supports the MH. that all this data has been delivered to fiser astrazenica and madna, but they claim that they cannot anonymize it for disclosure to the public.

Not publishing this data makes it seem like there is definitely something to hide, a recent survey in the US shows that more than half of the public believes that vaccines are responsible for a significant number of deaths, if there were not nothing to hide, they would certainly publish this data for analysis anonymously to stop the selling of legitimate concerns. The latest response from the information commissioner's office is that Dr Clare cr has to wait another six months at least before a case officer deals with this issue. This is not acceptable as they have given our health data to Big Farmer, but will not give it to us at the log data level.

Should it be published Is it really too much to ask Is it really too much to ask that the British public be given the same level of access to relevant data as was given to the big agricultural companies, the ones really responsible for this debacle? corporations that carefully secured immunity from all types of legal action, civil liability or indemnification from the government before dangerously and negligently experimenting with the health of our nation and the world, we are witnessing the largest medical scandal in living memory. The consequent consequences on public opinion and public confidence uh are just beginning.

Continuous attempts to shut down debate and flatten dissent. and obstructing independent Al can only delay the eventual collective embarrassment, it will be a reckoning and we are going to have to try to rebuild trust in our health services in our media and in our politics and we haven't even started That journey, Gary, before After being expelled from the Conservative party for expressing my concerns about these experimental vaccines and the harms I believe they called, I met with a senior member of the party who, after hearing my concerns about the vaccines and uh ng1 163, Mad a morphine Scandal told me quite calmly Andrew, there is currently no political appetite for your views on vaccines, in 20 years time there may be and you will probably be proven right, but in the meantime you should keep in mind that We are taking on the most powerful vested interests in the world with all the personal risk that will entail for you, so Gary, I refuse to give in to that threat and, as they say, the rest is history, people have alleged that I am talking about a conspiracy . theories well, I think it's a conspiracy, it's a conspiracy against science, it's a conspiracy of silence and S Gary, it's a conspiracy against the people and I won't have any of that wow and uh, clearly, there's a lot more to come.

We are not going to comment on individual points now, we are going to look at this in some detail and think about the responses of some of the other MPs present, but for now we will just publish this. is live that day, so for now, thank you very much, Mr. Andrew Bridgen, Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom.