Pfizer press release continues

Well, you're welcome to today's talk, Friday, February 3, a couple of days ago, probably about three days ago, we looked at the fires, a

press

release

that went out at 8 p.m. on Friday night and, of course, everyone knows it, I think. Now that the

press

release

was suggested by this Veritas organization that parked its van outside Pfizer's headquarters in Manhattan and there are well-known stories about what we are allowed to report, I'm not too sure about that, which is why I'm just Lo I'll leave it there, but in response to the Pfizer statement, this press release here and the first part we know, but then it goes on to tell us a lot of other things that were hidden along the way, so I guess.

A lot of people who came to this website went to the first part and didn't go into it further and we're going to do that now because Fires talks about some pretty worrying adverse reactions to their products so this was this site here um as we say at 8 p.m. m. on a Friday night uh they're talking about accusations of a gain of function uh and uh targeted research from Evolution that we looked at a few days ago needless to say, Pfizer denies it because they wanted to establish the to be clear, transparency is good now, coincidentally I actually made this poster a little bit ago I think when I'm allowed I think therefore I'm kind of like that so just to clarify the situation we don't want anyone to think unless someone does a lot . richer or much more important than you gives you permission to think that we do not want independent thought.

I think that's what that post is about, so think what you're supposed to think, not what the evidence suggests, anyway, back on topic, um, now this. it's directly from the Pfizer site and this is just copy and paste from there seek medical attention immediately if you have any of the following symptoms after vaccination difficulty breathing uh swelling of the face and throat, so difficulty breathing It could be bronchospasm or swelling of the upper airways. It could be a rapid heartbeat. A severe rash all over the body. Dizziness and weakness. Now clearly this is talking about the side effect of anaphylaxis.

Severe allergic reaction. What happens is that there is actually a massive release of histamine from mast cells and histamine constricts the bronchial tubes, making it difficult to breathe and histamine will also dilate the peripheral vasculature, the peripheral arteries send a lot of blood to the surface of the body, therefore reducing blood pressure, which causes compensatory tachycardia, so they are warning about this and it is good that they warn about this, but again we have looked at the evidence for this in the yellow card scheme, for example in the UK or a long time ago, ago weeks, so, Pfizer, was here talking about what is basically now in the public domain.

Well, that's a risk they're actually explaining and to give Pfizer fair credit for this, it's a good thing they're explaining it because it's the symptoms of anaphylaxis. Normally we would need to treat it with intramuscular injections of adrenaline or epinephrine if you are in the states. Adrenaline and epinephrine are exactly the same molecule. They also say to seek medical attention immediately if you have myocarditis, so inflammation of the heart muscle and the beating contractile myocardium, again they are clearly recognizing that this is an adverse reaction now, pericarditis, inflammation of the outside of the heart, so again They're talking about it and they're pretty funny.

This has happened after some people set fire to their vaccines and, of course, the modern ones of the other mRNA vaccines. are also associated with this risk now in this press release, again we remember reading directly from their site here, although buried under the slightly more interesting headline about the profit function and directed evolution. The observed risk, they say, is greater among adolescent males. and adult men under 40 years of age compared to older women and men. I've certainly encountered women who have had heart complications, so in no way does that mean they can't get it, but they do say it's more common in younger people.

Men's risk is highest in boys ages 12 to 17. Adolescent males are most at risk now in most people, they say symptoms start a few days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine, so I think it's important to be aware of those anaphylactic symptoms. What we saw would happen anywhere from a minute or two after the vaccine to typically within a few minutes, but it could be delayed up to an hour potentially, um, whereas these are these side effects that appear more slowly according to Pfizer. Symptoms began within a few days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine, not exclusively, although we have seen others after the first or third dose, but it is more common after the second dose, but qualifies that it does not specify the magnitude of the doll, so how many people.

It is not specified whether you have suffered these side effects, so we would like to be helpful on this channel, so we will provide information, but we recently analyzed this vaccine journal article published by the Japanese Society of Vaccinology for memory The Pfizer m9a vaccine against covid-19 is associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest 10.1 per thousand vaccinated, so it's about one in a thousand, right? For every thousand people vaccinated. uh modern um covid-19 vaccine associated with an excess. risk of serious adverse events, a special interest of 15, so I don't have the exact number, but that's about one in 650. and combined, that's one in 800, so about one in 800 people who receive the mRNA vaccines, according to the original reanalysis of the original clinical trial data, Pfizer and Moderna phase three clinical data published in Moderna may have a risk associated with an excess of one serious adverse event, one adverse event of special interest, so maybe that puts some kind of magnitude uh, just to help Pfizer um with their explanation because they didn't seem to put that in now, let's leave that risk, one in a thousand, one in six, fifty-one in 800. uh but uh Of course, this doesn't tell us about age, this is part of the problem here, we don't have the differentiated data from these original trials, these are general figures, so we can assume that the risk is higher in young men, for example , but if we compare this with the latest figures from the UK Health Security Agency and the joint committee on vaccination and immunization in the UK again the links are here all here see the links this is not made up in table three number needed to vaccinate, so how many people would you need? vaccinate to prevent hospitalizations or fear of hospitalization in different age groups, so if we look at the fall booster, for example, we would need to vaccinate 73,516 19-year-olds to prevent one hospitalization 73,500 to prevent one hospitalization severe 185,000 so we can see that this is 73 times less likely than a vaccine adverse event, so you can choose the Pfizer vaccine, for example, a one in thousand chance of a serious adverse event of special interest based on one's own data originals from Friday. need to vaccinate 73 500 to prevent hospitalization 185 100 prevent severe hospitalization um and severe hospitalization could simply mean that someone needs oxygen therapy according to this uh these UK Health Security Agency criteria 20 to 29 now this was not differentiated according to high and low risk, so this is general for everyone, we have to assume that this is general for all young people from 16 to 19 years old, um, those from 20 to 29 years old for the fall booster again, it is differentiated, uh , people without risk, would have to vaccinate 169,200 to prevent one hospitalization or would have to vaccinate 706,500 to prevent a severe hospitalization in a risk group that reduces to 7,500 vaccines necessary or 59,500 vaccines necessary to prevent a severe hospitalization and again simply compare even these numbers for uh Pfizer's risk of one in a thousand of um severe hospitalization, so the risk-benefit analysis has changed a lot, it's changed a lot, I mean, it's complete.

I think you have already understood it a little. Going back to the fisa report, side effects that have been reported with these vaccines include and again this is direct from Pfizer, so I assume this is in the public domain now they have to recognize these serious allergic reactions, non-serious allergic reactions, like rash, itching, hives, facial swelling, myocarditis, pericarditis, pretty. severe pain at the injection site less worrying but more systemic tiredness headache muscle pain uh chills joint pain fever all of those things worry me more because they are systemic in nature, they affect all the systems of the body, since in fact one Inflammation of the heart is systemic because the cardiovascular system, of course, is a body system, the injection sites swell less, as does the injection site, the redness is generally less, eh, it would be less worrying for me, nausea, malaise, swollen lymph nodes, lymphadenopathy, decreased appetite, diarrhea with the American spelling of course, vomiting, pain in the arm. pain in the arm infers that it goes to other parts of the arm, which again is more concerning.

I'd like to break it down, but that's what we know. fainting associated with the vaccine injection. unusually persistent irritability. unusual and persistent poor feeding. type of anorexia. unusual things. and persistent lack of energy again, these things are more worrying again because they are systemic reactions that indicate effects in other parts of the body than the injection site, of course, but the fires that continue are things admitted by Pfizer unusually in a persistent cold . Pale skin doesn't like the sound of that, that's not good at all. I agree with what they say, but persistent cold skin is like, um, it would mean you have peripherals off, which is not good, it's dizzy. uh the main thing is these may not be all the possible side effects of these vaccines so they admit there are possibly other side effects again the numbers would be good here uh but the fires they don't give us numbers just list these things, call the vaccine provider. or healthcare provider about the discomfort of some side effects that may not go away, so are they admitting here that side effects that don't go away seem like that?

I don't really like the way the book is simply passed on to healthcare personnel. providers, people should always seek medical advice from their healthcare provider about adverse events, so, well, again, there is a universal policeman, this is encouraging. I am pleased to see that the side effects of this vaccine are being reported, so you are being advised. report vaccine side effects through the vaccine adverse event reporting system, this is in the United States, in the United Kingdom of course it would be the yellow card system and that is where I reported my suspected reaction adverse to mRNA vaccines using the yellow card scheme, but not many people do it, only about 10 percent, according to medicines and healthcare regulatory authorities, report serious side effects and only about two to four percent percent report less serious side effects, so we really need to encourage UK nurses and doctors to report many more adverse reactions. and people to report many more adverse reactions in the UK, it was easy to do so.

Submitting my yellow card report was not difficult at all. How difficult it is to use the See system in the states. I've never used it, so I don't. I don't know, let me know, but they are advising you and they also say that you can report these adverse reactions directly to Pfizer. That's what they say. I'm not so sure. Our fires are building up interesting. This means that? The fires are collecting their own data sets on adverse reactions and it appears that this is not the case as well as the official uh vaccine adverse event reporting system in the states.

Tell your vaccinator about all your medical conditions, including if you have allergies. I have had myocarditis or pericarditis. I have a fever again. This will be true for all vaccines. I don't put much emphasis on the fact that I have a bleeding disorder. I take a blood thinner, we are immunocompromised, or I take a medication that affects the immune system. I hope that the person who is giving the vaccine is a medical expert, to understand all this, are they pregnant or what do they say here. I don't know, they're pregnant. I mean, in the UK we are vaccinating people who are pregnant, why?

I'm not really sure why the fires say they know something we don't know well, obviously I don't know, that's what Donald Rumsfeld will call a strangerunknown, have received another covered vaccine, have fainted, and have been associated with an injection. the vaccine mate oh here this is interesting here Pfizer says the vaccine may not protect everyone very interesting interesting here there are fires in this press release they say the vaccine may not protect everyone and check this they are all here, This isn't me making things up, this is all here in Pfizer's press release, although buried earlier under the slightly brighter information. um, have I ever fainted.

Yes, the vaccine may not protect everyone properly, so the vaccine may not protect everyone. A simple statement of fact. Fact-based information from Pfizer themselves and rooted in solid sites is vitally important to overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic. I agree and Pfizer remains committed to transparency and helping to alleviate the devastating burdens of this disease. Some people might think it's a little more transparent with the help. of alcohol and the potential for sexual opportunities, but that's not for me to say, so here we go, make sure you don't think for yourself. You can download these posters of course Simon who is freely available has made them more.freely available to download um it would be nice if they were all over the world why not why not.

The good, the good photos, this, by the way, is Hadrian's Wall near where I live and this is the ring of brogda in the uh. the neolithic site in the orchids is good, so I guess that's us for today. It's interesting that all of this comes directly from Pfizer itself. Why do they list so many of its side effects there? I'm not entirely sure. I guess it's because they're in the public. domain and I don't fully know it now, but they are there and we can report these side effects because they are now officially recognized, we will leave it there, thanks for watching.