Shocking Update By Candice Cooley & Justin Rounds | Dylan Rounds First Burial Site Found ? Analysis

Hello, welcome back to the Dylan Rounds case. Welcome, if you're currently here on today's live premiere, we'll be discussing the latest interview with Candice Cooley and Justin Rounds from the East Idaho News Channel. It was recently produced and there is something

shocking

. news, some

shocking

discoveries that have been taught during the interview, as well as some possible contradictions. I would say that even though the interview itself only lasted about 16 minutes, it is possibly one of the most important interviews I have ever heard and talked about. some of the more interesting things about the case, okay, today what I'm going to do is go through it and give you my thoughts, my opinions on the matter, maybe comparing and contrasting what we knew originally with what we know now again and as we do it.

Go ahead, you can share your thoughts, opinions and reactions in the chat box. If we encounter any resistance, try to ignore it and focus on the Dylan Rounds case. Feel free to ask questions as we go and I'll try. and respond to them that they have to do with this case, but I think what we will do

first

of all is go back through the last video to acknowledge the comments, as a heads up, the comments section will not take as long this time compared to yesterday, so Greetings to the people who were patient and stayed there.

What I do want to acknowledge is that yesterday we reached a new personal best on this channel; at one point there was a total of about one hundred and fourteen live viewers, which is fine. It simply serves to share that I can reach those numbers despite what some people deep down say stating that I have never done it well, they are liars and they do things wrong, as they normally do, in reality it is a statistical test, even the Crazy watcher, you know, she says that she witnessed it because she was there and she likes the statistics and all that, like she said, it seems to excite her a lot, but today I have to maintain some kind of control.

You're crazy because we have some very important information to talk about, so everyone who is present right now and joining in, make sure you stick around to get the full story of what happened recently with Candice Cooley just in

rounds

, if you still They don't have them compared to my previous video. which was a last minute discovery of a piece of clothing

found

by a certain person and also documented and broadcast by Thai Corbin with the footage of her. There will be a link below to watch that video. If you want to see it properly, the links below are fine.

What we can do now is just go through the comments, see if there are any questions that need to be answered or any additional points and then go from there, okay, I'll do it, I'll organize it into the newest one and we start from the bottom of the KB, saying wall. The light referee has periodically told us that he never blocks or kicks anyone in his chat and that he is 100% honest, so the reality is that I have never kicked anyone out of the chat when it comes to blocking most of the time, that is the key phrase that I've always used for the most part, people haven't been blocked and a good example is last night, okay and we'll just acknowledge it briefly because it was obvious, you know if, regardless of who was present watching what you know, the audience level, Jim Terry made pop.

More so, just advertising his channel, something you know he usually does here and now on other channels too, but it was a bit excessive, you could say he was spamming the chat, but it's obvious why it was being done, like when a the person throws their toys out of the stroller, you know they have a fit of rage, you know, a whining moment, it's just one of those little mini meltdowns, okay, it is what it is, but it was eventually drowned out by the focus. in the case of Dolan

rounds

and again, if it happens tonight, we'll just follow the same steps we did yesterday and so on.

It's all under control, also the reason why it's important to allow Jim Terry to leave a comment here and the reason is if he acts like a jerk, that's on him, that's his doing, if he wants to then he can, if wants to appear neutral, he can, if he wants to appear as if he knows everything, he allows it. It provides the opportunity for Jim Terry to speak openly in the chat and perhaps Mr. of documenting and getting if you want to call it receipts of certain behavior, documented pancakes in the past with certain comments, people were like, how did you get that?

Damn, I would never have thought of doing something like that. I did the same thing with Jim Terry. in the past when he was on his knees apologizing to me because he made a mistake right, it is what it is now let's continue with Robert Burger saying headband full of DNA question after a year who knows so this is in response to the garment that was

found

yesterday day before Well, the video was made yesterday, the actual discovery of the hat was the day before, okay, but the question last night was how long was that baseball cap near the side of that road?

I think someone said 20 feet. off road nearby basically how long has it been there and if its in an open

site

why did it take so long to find it? Well, there were some additional responses last night. I think the wheezing is also included with what she knew by saying how it was half buried in the ground and may have a clay like texture and the stains on the hat are a little dirty like it could have been buried but not completely . Was it man made? Was it natural or was it not enough? Added Misty's guide in the possibility. that he was actually buried, but perhaps due to weathering and rain over time, it was washed away by slightly eroded parts and was exposed now you could put the argument and say: could that ever happen to Dylan?

Wherever he is buried, we will do it. a survey right now based on this topic and topic the pole can be do you think there is a possibility with the natural weathering time and the climate itself like rain coldness? I don't know, could that be the key factor that reveals, exposes Dylan?

burial

site

, wherever it is, I know in the past Weezer was talking about soil disturbance and how it takes time for the ground to settle, that was another factor, okay, just let me know what you think in the poll, make sure you chat, make sure you use the verb, okay.

I mean, we should eventually come to a conclusion on the limit, as long as Thai Corbin makes a follow-up

update

video and doesn't stay silent like Lance Kelly did in the past with certain findings that may have been a dead end, although it's always good. recognize a dead end result only to take it off the list if it doesn't clear up then it remains an unhelpful mystery so yes we should eventually get the DNA results back, hopefully it can be talked about publicly. we have beatrice saying yes this john deere cap video is breaking news thank you.

I mean, what she would say is that if the cap was a different brand and it wasn't John Deere, then maybe you could say it's not breaking news. but saying John dare and considering Dylan was going to wear John Deere hats makes you think what is this Pam I don't know what Pam was doing here here you go News 8 Idaho news with Nate news hashtag East Idaho I think Pam I got carried away a little bit because of the comments or it could be one of those things where you kept posting the comment and it said it wouldn't be posted or error message and then you find out you posted it two or three times.

For me in the past YouTube dummy once again Linda Cushing wall light reference why is there a red heart in my chat today? Personally, I don't know, above the chat bar, Christy, you can click on it and send hearts or other emojis to Rafi during the video. let's try it next time, well I guess we could try it right now, everyone in the chat right now, if you see a heart or something like that symbol in the chat above or something, click on it, okay, don't worry, it is not. I'm going to take you off the broadcast.

I think it could be something interactive, but just click on it and see what happens. Okay everyone, click now. See how it looks on the screen. Pam again with another comment. Take it easy. Pam Cindy enforced the law. checks the baseball cap that belongs to Dylan rounds. I'm also curious that you went to see Brenna to ask questions. Well, Cindy, I haven't gotten a Brookie out right now. Okay, as for this police check. I think it's too soon considering it just happened. A couple of days ago I think there will be a bit of a wait because it also has to be sent to the labs and I don't know if it's entirely true but I'm sure I saw a comment. by Tom Evans saying it could take seven to 12 weeks to process DNA or something like that with the labs.

I don't know if that applies in this scenario or just others, but it was just a vague figure I heard about in the middle, okay, Lone Wolf loved it. curl in your hair who does your hair Maria she does it right Bill Brooks Bob who Bob the Builder if you talk about who Bob is Bob Ferrell oh no he said it wrong Bob Farrell I used to call Bob Farrell like a wild animal because I thought he was how to spell it, but I realized it was wrong Bob Farrell, a person who has supported this channel recently, which is good of him, he also has his own channel, he has done some videos here and there, live streams, Better to split here and there, obviously. with different audiences, but people have been listening to Bob with his recent talks about the case and he recently started uploading videos, what else do we have in Badger's life saying that Jim Terry, the scammer, deceives so many people and is so It is difficult for them to realize that they have been scammed.

Jim is only doing this because the family didn't want him to comment on people fooling themselves. I mean all I'll say is a general scenario on YouTube if you have a certain channel that might be causing problems in general and then you have an audience behind it the backup set and the support set can be a little iffy sometimes , while everyone can quickly call and take photos on that channel, it is fine and the person behind it. You also have to consider that the audience is technically part of this because they support it following the Creator's right, does the hair apply well?

It varies quite a bit because there are a lot of different people, a lot of different audiences from different channels, that's pretty much it. It's like a mix of things, you know? some people might call some members of the pancake audience or members of the Jim Terry audience, but the ones that have come here haven't given me any problems, so like Betty Haywood, Miss T here is a good example, Dale and Graham, in his own unique, quote-unquote way, they're fine, steady, Eddie, quick, Eddie hasn't really given me any trouble in this chat, has he, anyone else, weed or B gorilla, Jack, so that's what which I say at least from my experience and only my experience I have seen potential good sides in these different individuals and many more people out there in which other humans who see these people can only see the bad side of them, you understand what I am saying , so "I haven't seen it all the time, at all, but more than usual.

I have seen the good side of these individuals, but don't worry, I'm not a delusional, rainbow-bright person who does everything possible. Not at all, let's move on." Got Goldie Khan with a super chat, shout out to Goldie Khan, good guy, they're a good guy and they've been around for a while on the channel saying thanks guys, Posse, yeah, it's like a little line that I use sometimes, it does. It more or less works, what is this, don't mention it. I see you're working overtime doing CT and it doesn't go unnoticed. I will write that my absence may hit me hard because YouTube YouTube is a bit strict at the moment. they're on hold, but you know, if you want a whip, Goldie Khan, at some point you can have one if that's what you want, okay, so eventually it'll be under control.

Shout out to Goldie Khan. He also got Christy B to say a very interesting video. thank you, you have the best

analysis

on youtube, you would make a great private investigator, no wonder why some are angry. Maybe Christy will also say it's true, there's no evidence that Dylan was dismembered, right, but do we have evidence that he's dead? Well, I mean, I have to keep my balance to be realistically honest, there's no real evidence that Dylan was dismembered, there's no hair on his hands, legs there, that's not the case right now, so which rules out it being real, perhaps the weakest evidence to suggest the dismemberment would be real.

Blood was found on the boot and more on Brenner, right, a level of blood makes you think in terms of the side of the evidence that has to do with whether Dylan is dead or not. Tom Evans is still undecided, he's questioning things, right? I would say the evidence. which may not be enough, but for me it's enough to get an idea. The evidence suggesting that Dylan is no longer alive would simply be the length of time he has beentime and it was inaccurate, I could question and say yes, but what about the main line? What about the grain shed?

There could be more. close to him or nearby, you never know, maybe they are defending Candice Cooley, just in the rounds he showed a level of confidence, he spoke on his own behalf, he nodded and said yes, we have checked it, we have spent hours there, so if you don't I can't believe what Cooley says about Candy just in rounds, she backs it up, so you're more likely to believe what she says, which is the same thing Candice Cooley says right now. The next point mentioned to everyone in the chat right now, make sure you're focused and listening because you could say this is, in a way, a massive contradiction, in a sense, it's okay if you think about it enough, so make sure you be focused at this moment.

Candy Cooley continued to say in the interview, I guess, when Nate Eaton asked him a question. to do with Brenna Candice Cooley said in quotes Brenner is not speaking, she is not speaking well, would you expect her not to really, but from what we know from the past and what Candy's Cooley said ago moms, around March 3rd, when Brenner was charged? and in that interview at the time, which may or may not have made Eastern Idaho news, thank you Doug Candy's Cooley in one of those interviews at the time shortly after he referred to how Brenner's Cooley Kenny said that Brenner is willing to open up and reveal the location of where The remains of Dylan's rounds are that's what Candice Cooley said, at least at that time, Brenner was willing to talk about what happened, then Cooley of Candy and Justin rejected the offer.because they they felt confident enough that they could be the one to find Dylan and not have help from the devil if you want to call it that and yet now Candy's Cooley suddenly accuses Brenna and calls him out saying maybe he doesn't talk for the most part .

It's not, but there was a moment, an opportunity, a moment to be able to see Brenna speak, but you turned it down. I'm sure, I guess Candy's Cooley is aware of that, I guess, so you see that slight contradiction in saying that Brenna isn't. speaking, but he was willing to do it in the past, but Candy's Cooley just didn't reject him, so you can't complain at this time when there was a chance back then, so that's a slight contradiction at the time when it started the conversation. More towards Brenner's last court hearing on that interview again, there hasn't been any Candy Cooley interview since that April 24th court hearing with Brenna, so it was just a matter of time until when the next interview comes out on YouTube, I guess I'd be talking about that and that's exactly what happened yesterday on the East Idaho News Channel, one's okay and Candy's Cooley basically broke it down in the order that it all played out, so initially the court hearing on 24 April 2023 with Brenner's Cooley Candy anticipated that Brenner would speak.

Pleading guilty or not guilty, whatever it is, although it didn't even get to that point, it didn't even come to a conclusion, it was delayed until June 5th and the reason that happened was because Brenner's original lawyer ended up resigning Brenner. He left, why I don't really know, but that's what happened on April 24, 2023, when Brenner showed up at that court hearing without an attorney who couldn't really move forward with things right, so during that time of that audience were talking. about appointing a new number two attorney, the second attorney, and that happened and from then on, what probably should have happened was wait until June 5 and then that second attorney would end up representing Brenner, but Candy's Cooley said that the second attorney also resigned from Brenner. and it's like, wow, everyone rejects Brenner.

I wonder why they hate it so much. A strong conflict of interest makes you think hard, so because the second lawyer resigned in the interview, Candice Cooley said they then introduced two more lawyers. It has been a success? Well, not much else has actually been mentioned since then, but two more attorneys have come forward, so that's where things are right now with Brenna and her legal team, okay, damn, Candice Cooley also mentioned that The old cashier has shown the evidence he has. It's been collected over time for Brenner now, maybe that's a normal and standard thing to be honest, but I wonder how Brenner reacted when he saw the evidence shown by the old man in the box.

He was shocked and shocked. He said yes, it's not enough, it's not that bad, it's not like that. incriminating or was I thinking oh damn that 27 second clip of me with the blood on my shirt of Dylan cleaning that gun oh how did I miss that I thought I deleted it when I threw it in the pond you know what's going through Brenda's mind in That moment, when you looked at that evidence, let me know your thoughts below, did you feel invincible or did your understanding break that damn, there is incriminating evidence against me, let me know your thoughts below, okay, now, apart from That, Candy's Cooley said how things have been going, especially with that court hearing on April 24, how things basically pretty much fell apart and the attorneys quit over the Brenner cases that were delayed, were delayed.

Candy's Cooley feels like Brenner is in Webby Weber County Jail, laughing at the thought that he's untouchable, she's in control. he's like the key to finding Dylan, but at the same time he's kind of untouchable right now because there's not much being done, there's not much progression, so I think Candy's cooldown can be felt and thought that way because others experiences as she described them the police had. That at the sheriff's office their big box, just Le, had laughed at Candy Cooley in the past during the case in the early days, so maybe that's why Candy Cooley is overly alert assuming that Brennan is doing the same from what we have heard.

Brenner is pretty cold and emotionless, maybe he's not laughing. I don't know if anyone can confirm if Brenner is the kind of guy who smokes a lot, he laughs a little cockily, that was all just cool and calm and that's it. regarding this, apart from the assault, let me know if he also has the list of additional points below. Candice Cooley said there was no plea, there has been no plea, so I assume guilty, not guilty, that has not happened and that would make sense because the court hearing on April 24th that was never conducted properly, so it's not It's no wonder why there was no plea deal regarding the plea deal that was offered in the past to Candy's Cooley Justin, who rejected it, which consisted of a result determined by revealing Dylan's rounds information it's still good, it was rejected, okay, I think there's a difference between a guilty plea and a plea agreement, okay, guilty plea is just guilty, not guilty, a plea agreement is, on top of that, some kind of negotiation right so that each party gets something. they need and want well, I like it, in general, during all that time since March 3, 2023, where I felt that things were starting in the right direction.

Brenna was officially charged with Dylan's murder and desecration, three months since then, nothing. more has happened, there has been no more progression, that's what Cooley basically said about Candy in the East Idaho News Channel interview, so maybe it's all going back to that feeling that in the early days of the case there was no progression, it's happening once again, yeah, it's probably a little frustrating, also regarding June 5th the court case June 5th we think you know it's getting closer, it's getting closer and closer to what Candy's Cooley has said, that's probably It won't happen anymore, so what that implies is the next court hearing, which should be June 5.

It's been postponed, it's been delayed even further, that's exactly what I said to Tom Evans about a week ago, what he was talking about, oh, when is the next court hearing? Someone responded on June 5th and I added in my response saying that if it really happens it will probably be delayed. and look what happened, it was delayed again and I predicted it too, okay, so let's move on to the next batch of notes within this continuation of the East Idaho News Channel interview that has to do with the reference to Brenner and the talk about the death penalty that also appears to be underway. and the bartender confirmed it at that main hearing on April 24, 2023.

The death penalty has been taken off the tables, but in the East Idaho News Channel interview, when asked about the death penalty by Nate Eaton, the way in which she responds it's like it's still a possibility. now is she deluding herself or is there a small chance because Candy's Cooley briefly mentioned I don't know if it's true if glorendelin is present maybe she can correct me or her, but Candy's Cooley said that the only time two lawyers didn't comply with one person It's a sign that the death penalty is on the table, but from what we've heard, the death penalty has been taken away, so from what Cooley says about Kenny, what's been given back to Brenner, no.

I know, but That's how Cooley from Candy worded it so it seems to be on, off, off, which is a little complicated, okay. Candy's Cooley also said this is a pretty important part. Well, yeah, I just wanted to confirm that what we're talking about now is one of the most important parts of this whole case, the possibilities, they'll make more sense in a second, but everyone in the chat right now make sure you're focused and listening because what's going to be said here is very important and ties into what I was originally saying back then, so start doing the Dylan searches.

Candice Cooley said we were there Wednesday cleaning up a suspicious location. Now it's very vague, but it makes you think carefully and when he said Wednesday, does that mean that Wednesday has already passed? she didn't exactly give the date, it would be a shame if Wednesday just went well, they were cleaning up a suspicious location, the canine unit with the dog came to check it out, did it lead to any discoveries? I don't know, Candy's Cooley did it. I don't really explain it, so the chances of being very vague could imply that something was found, but they don't want to say it yet, public, right.

I'm going to say a suspicious point, how it looked visually and certain readings. Behavior of people within that area. that gave a feeling of suspicion, it opens up all kinds of questions, but we don't stop there because there's a bit more to address that's really important, so we haven't even gotten to the main part yet, so wait. I, Candy, Cooley, refers to other areas, like the main line, saying that she was dug up six weeks, that's how she actually worded it. The main line has been dug up for six weeks, it was dug up the

first

time in the early days and it was also dug up six weeks ago, he didn't use the word ago, so I don't know if Kenny's curling means the main line was dug up in the beginning of the case in 2022 and then it was unearthed six weeks later or she means that most Recently, in 2023, the main line was unearthed six weeks ago, she left out that key word that would have helped provide better clarity, so you'll notice a pattern in the Eastern Idaho news interview where Candy's Cooley leaves out some key words that provide some There's some sort of relevant context for exactly when it happened, but yeah, the main line that's being unearthed once again now is that Candy is clearly talking about Dylan's main line or the pivot main line north of the grain shed property across from the railroad tracks and wash house. which does not belong to Dylan, but it was a place that at the time was owned by an individual who was sick, Don Haley had to take care of to monitor the seeds, but he did not, and that was also unearthed by what the quintessence of Quinton. any main line that maybe six weeks ago was dug up again, double checked, supposedly they found nothing, but I guess there's nothing wrong with digging it all up just in rounds and added that they dug it all up completely, which provides a bit of information. better understand that, like if you went down there now and you loosened up and looked at the main line, could you detect that it was dug up six weeks ago?

Yes, now someone confirms that might provide a bit of context as to when. Justin added his own points as well as being a little quiet in the interview, as expected when Candy Cooley is there. Justin said there are many mounds of dirt within Lucin and it is almost impossible to check them all like Justin Candice did. Check out a strange one recently, but they didn't find anything there, so there are chances of earthen mounds like a

burial

or tomb, so it would seem a bit obvious, right? But then again, if there are that many mounds out there, you can probably escape.

When putting Dylan in one, think about it, the main focus onIt was originally the mound of dirt near the grain shed where the boots were found, so supposedly they didn't find anything and that's why they would have been checking others. Mounds since then, Justin added that some of them are caused by animals. I don't know why animals cause Mounds. When digging the soil and dirt accumulate close and pile up on top of each other, perhaps compacting in the same way. like someone made it artificially, baby, I mean, because of the weather, when it rains, it might compact itself naturally, so there's that, but yeah, as far as True Mounds, I haven't really seen many, but it just depends. what pictures I've been looking at maybe some are bigger than others possibly most of them are quite small and close to the ground, but you know you can't help but think that when you see them you might assume that maybe there is a possible disturbance of the ground, the dirt. but then again, isn't that why drones are there for obvious reasons to be able to identify what makes sense faster?

Yeah, anyway, aside from that, this is where we get to one of the most important points, right? kidding when I say this, it's okay because it really ties into what I was saying as possibilities for everyone listening. Candice Cooley said there was an area where groups of dogs different groups of canines over time reacted in a certain way in the specific area for months. Now no location or coordinates have been given, but there is an area over time over months where when groups of dogs have entered or passed by, the dogs have reacted in a certain way, it could involve smelling the scent of something, possibly remains , you get what I'm saying and adding that Candy's Cooley said, based on that area that was marked in quotes, that he believes Dylan was there while Brenner was thinking about what to do next, just let the process be sure that Cooley's Candy is giving an opinion, it is not an In fact, keep this in mind too, but the reality is that over time there are different groups of dogs, not just one without prejudice, but many different groups and all the dogs have reacted In the same way in a particular place, an area that makes you question, right?, it does the same thing. reaction in different types of dogs, different groups in this place, something must be happening right, so most likely they searched for him, but nothing was found, obviously Dylan is not there, but there is a possibility that Dylan was once there, right?

The dog may sniff out something like scattered remains, which is the general term desecration. Well I like how I read it in the past and you would have to watch my previous videos when I was reading the official court documents about the desecration and the news articles basically implied that Dylan was buried somewhere and then dug up and moved somewhere else. and that falls under the term desecration. Now many people disagreed with me and showed resistance back then, one individual just as an example. because he's the only person that comes to mind at the moment Nick Nick, whatever his username is, which appears sometimes with a profile picture of a baseball cap or something.

Nick TV was saying no, that's not desecration, no, Dylan wasn't removed from somewhere else, no, no, no, no. It doesn't depend at all on how you read the text at the time, okay, and what he was saying in response to Nick, but also to many of the people who in the official court documents at the time Brenner was charged of desecration of human remains. gave conditions for simply concealing a body, removing a body, removing a person from the ground and putting them somewhere else, or damaging the body, such as setting it on fire, decomposing it, and destroying evidence, was a general term that gave different conditions based on how what we have now heard about today with our interview on East Idaho News Channel could have turned out well, leans closer to the possibilities that Brenner and perhaps someone else buried Dylan in a particular location as redacted hair to which how did the dogs react after

dylan

was taken away if you bury a body somewhere it can leach out there can be substance there can be bits of DNA that seep into the ground and dirt you dig that person out make sure there's nothing left and then take them somewhere I mean, bury it somewhere else, that original spot will contain a form of DNA for a limited period of time, although that's okay, that might explain why the dogs were reacting the way they did over time in that spot, that's why Candy's Cooley came to a possible conclusion that Dylan was temporarily buried in that particular location and then moved to another location afterwards and it would make sense because maybe you're doing it in the location, you know, if you think that Dylan was taken out by the looks of his murder on the 28th of May 2022 and then gave Brenna the rest of the afternoon to get rid of Dylan if necessary and maybe Brenner did, he temporarily put Dylan in a particular place where those dogs reacted later because more Later that day Brenner also assisted Don Haley. barbecue, so just to get on with things, hurry up and then the next day, all day, full opportunity to then move Dylan somewhere else and put him in a better hiding place, if you think about it, if that never happened if Dylan was never moved anywhere else under The correct term desecration, Dylan would be found right now and he actually said that statement months ago in that news article and people told me, wow, that's a little far, that's a little exaggerated, you're making a very bold statement there and look where I am.

Right now I'm saying the same thing about how Candy's Cooley uses debt possibilities, but in that area where the dogs were they were reacting by considering that nothing was found there after what was originally there, you know, I don't think it would have been possible within the deadline. period of time because if Brenner buried Dylan 28, he would temporarily get him out on the 29th or maybe Monday by the time the search and rescue family got there, they wouldn't have a chance, but if Brenner thought, oh, this place will do, no I would. I have and Dylan would have been found by now, so at this point I'm talking, it seems like a possibility that he was right once again about the desecration part.

Let me know what you think about that. there because there were some even more shocking discoveries and additional points to make that make you think, oh, here we go again, so besides that suspicious spark in the key area that the dogs were reacting to because of some kind of smell or DNA, you know? What Cooley said about Candy is that one area in particular was never forensically analyzed and was analyzed too late because over time it was lost, whatever it was in the early days, whatever that smell or DNA was, whatever there was. In that place, it was cool, but over time it faded.

It can't be there forever, so an important and key point was not forensically proven, so it is the police who are to blame for that incompetence for not being proactive enough and not checking that place. Did Candice Cooley tell Le about that area? Hey, you need to come here, you need to do some kind of forensic

analysis

on the area and they said no, we're not doing it, if that's really the case. Still, if some CAF forensics had been done back then, I probably wouldn't have driven. that Dylan was found in that place due to the conditions I listed beforehand, but it really could have reinforced the fact that this is where Dylan was like 100 nailed, although we'll ever get it now, so this is yet another failure in the Dylan rounds out the case in another critical moment and a critical piece of evidence as to the evidence that points in one direction to where Dylan is, the Address-based evidence, most of which is missing, lost, all of it.

Evidence related to Dylan's possessions possibly doesn't really point to one direction. It has been found that you see that the pattern does not look very good in my opinion, nothing more, yes, in addition to that, there is also reference to the failure of the forensic tests at that key point and in the shed Candice Cooley said and in the shed that all was lost, well that's cool isn't it? But I think it's very important to recognize one thing, as I told you a couple of videos that support key pieces of evidence that Candice Cooley has never talked about despite her being in the presence. of some of them was the backhoe with blood all over the floor inside the grain shed and a little too true evidence that Kenny's Cooley has never referred to or talked about and I always thought why is Lo that people say and the lady at the shack says that it all came from Candice Howard, who is another person who may be in contact with Candice Cooley, but why would Candice Howard pass that information on to the general public or to certain people, but not to Candice Cooley herself until the East Idaho News Channel interview, in addition to the bat cow not being taught about the grain shed, was correctly hinted at, although Candice Cooley did not say that the hole in the grain shed, she said about the DNA, some kind of evidence was found in the shed that I didn't follow up on, well you would assume that the hole in the ground was dug up, but that's a contradiction because Shack Lady is saying, what's it called?

Biological matter was found in that small hole. Candice Howard supposedly said it originally and yet Candice Cooley now says nothing was found there because it was lost it wasn't done in time forensics wasted what are we? what's going on what's going on doesn't sound very good right all that wasted potential plus the truck like this is what the list has been building up as time has gone on originally I just thought oh it was the Brenis phone which no You know, it collected data fast enough and it was Dylan's truck that those 100 miles of data were lost on.

I thought it was but after listening to the interview today, yesterday, every time there is a lot more evidence, potential evidence that was never collected or recorded and wasted over time never to be seen again, that is bad, so we will do another poll right now based on what I have told you so far in this recent interview, do you think the lack of forensic evidence in those suspicious areas that supposedly include the grain shed has been detrimental to the decline in progress made in this case? Yeah, now A little bit I don't know you know, make sure you vote right now, okay, we don't stop there, we have more information to pass on, okay, so Nate Eaton asked his Aaron some good questions, more he reflected on the day Dylan went missing on the 28th and make a call there okay Candice Cooley which I will say now she made another mistake so it's not that bad but I'll acknowledge it earlier when Candice Cooley was talking about phone calls Dylan called people first at 6:51 a.m. to Grandma Karen.

Rounds Dylan made that call saying I have to do this, I have to park the grain truck and the grain shed. I will call again later, which never happened. Then at 6 58 6 58 a.m. m., I made a call to Brenna, he didn't answer and then it was 703 the next time. seal to the right of Dylan's phone signal, but 703 was not a correct call, it was just the phone ringing in that area near the grain shed, I assumed that Dylan managed to get there even though the door It was locked at the most recent interview. Eastern Idaho News Candy's Cooley said, "Oh, Dylan flattened the door, rolled it to the ground and then proceeded to keep driving.

Is that possible? Well, with the recent footage, what we looked at and analyzed was Jlr Gary, with the baseball cap on and the pointy nose, yes, it is." very doable, it is a very rickety fragile fence, you can flatten it easily. On the ground, guaranteed, there's a good chance that's what Dylan probably did, but in this East Idaho News Channel interview when Candy Cooley was referring to that phone call Dylan made to Brenna Candice Cooley this time. said, "Oh, Dylan made the call to Brenna at 703 a.m., not 6:58 a.m., now the time difference between the two timestamps isn't that big, but it doesn't make sense why Dylan would call Brenner at 703 if that timestamp is in the grain." Why would Dylan need to make a call to Brenner when Dylan is literally standing near Brenna's trailer?

Why doesn't he just go to his trailer and knock on the door instead of making a phone call outside the trailer? That's what makes me believe in Candy's Cooley. He was wrong about that figure and what he meant on previous occasions was 6:58 a. m., he called Mater to Brenna and then there was no answer, so that's what I guess caused Dylan to flatten the fence because there was no hope that Brenna wasn't calling anyone else. is present the doors closed you have to get the grain truck to the grain shed before it rains screw this flattened the door drive there 703 timestamp the next phone signal from Dylan that's what I would saymakes more sense just wanted to highlight that for you anyway, in case you're wondering now, the other question had to do with Don Hatley and Brenner.

You already know his level of communication. In last night's video we talked about how they are a double act to keep appearing. here and there and they appear together like Dale and Graham, but in this case, more dubious, darker, with Brenna and Don, they always seem to appear here and there together during these key moments and events where Dylan disappears, it makes you think, although Nate Eaton The question had more to do with the 28th, what about the conversations that took place other than Dylan calling Brenner, um, on the door. I'm guessing some of the conversations took place throughout the day and what Candice Cooley said was that Don Hatley texted Brenner later. on the day about the barbecue okay, that's interesting and I'll explain why it's possible proof that the barbecue took place recently.

In the comments section someone asked me if there is any proof that the barbecue went well if Don texted Brenna. In this regard, there is a form of testing that also does this and it is a huge contradiction to what Candice Cooley said at the beginning. She hasn't mentioned it since, so it's a big leap and a big leap to take into account in the early days of this case. Candice Cooley said in an interview that the data on Brenner's phone, but as Americans say and look at their crazy Galler phone, it couldn't be recovered, it was lost because the police didn't collect it in time and didn't document that Brenner's phone It was an old flip phone. what data and stuff on their phone only lasted seven days and then it would be lost and that's why they didn't get it back in time, if that's the case and it was lost then how can Candice Cooley in this recent interview confirm that Don le texted Brenna about the BBQ, does she know about Brenner's data?

Brenner's text call log makes you think hard and if not at least Don Haley's text call, luck must have been able to get those phones in the early days to see what was on and the phone pings, so it is positive that it will possibly turn back on and highlight that yes, there is a truth that data was collected from those phones and the pings from the phone were collected just as some of my channel viewers were saying during the As time went by, but it would have been nice to hear it reconfirmed by people more involved in the case, and in some ways that's what's happened now for Candice Cooley, although it's a huge contradiction to what she originally said that they were never collected because they were lost. but now she's here saying that they were found and conversations took place so she must know more now than she knew then but she never broached the topic in between okay so Candy's Cooley also added saying that Don Haley and Jim.

Brenner's communication levels increased greatly during the time the family was there on Lucid looking for Dylan. Now why is he so good? You could just say that maybe Don and Jim communicate more now because they're trying to find Dylan. You might think that. but I think most people would say they're probably communicating in the background because of what's going on because of the search and rescue police presence. Candy's Cooley family comes in a short space of time, very shortly after Dylan's murder and burial it's probably as if we didn't anticipate this right, we have to move on with things, we have to move things, we have to communicate and making sure we've covered our tracks and everything, etc., that's what I'd be thinking.

Let's do a poll right now, based on what we've heard here. Do you think the communication levels increased between Don and Jim due to suspicious reasons or normal conversation and does that have to do with Dylan? I'm going to say suspicious reasons depending on whether I can include them in the survey option or not, I mean communicating in the background about what our next step is, what we should do with Dylan, have you hidden that object?, have you returned?, that type of communication away from the police, away from the family to try to clear their tracks.

Miss T was talking about spring. she cleaning on June 2nd saying how ridiculous it was how it all happened and unfolded. All I'll say is that it might have been a good opportunity and time to allow Brenner, maybe even Don, who could have joined Brenna later to do what they were doing. all natural as the police mind their own business, but by secretly monitoring whether they reacted too soon perhaps Brenner would change his behavior. You want it as natural as possible so you see the truth and then catch up with Brenner and then follow him in the middle.

It never happened, so it was a complete failure, but there are possibilities to turn laziness into a real reason to let Brennan do what he did well. I also want to add spring cleaning to the end of the day. June, the second police presence. family there Candice Cooley maybe searched and rescued many people present, but Brenna felt invincible enough to just go in and do what she wanted because she was sure the police wouldn't do anything to her, she didn't have much confidence with Le He's right , if Brenner the criminal, the main guy can also think that way and move on, what I will say is, why the hell didn't Brenner do spring cleaning on May 31st, a couple of days before May 31st?

Kurt Wadsworth made That phone call to the family police about Dylan's hostage situation in Montello was a hoax call, but he managed to get the family and the police to Montello, whether for one or two whole days, they were away from the place he would have been the perfect opportunity to go to the grain shed move things over hide remove things bag it tag it and not even get caught or questioned had the perfect timing and opportunity, but Brenner didn't do that, he did it a few days later when everyone was present, so my question is for you and make sure if you're watching right now, leave a response in the chat or in the comments section, why do you think it happened that way?

And more so, the main question is what were Brenna and Don doing on May 31st, if the family and police went to Montello to verify that fake call for Dylan to be held hostage there, what were Brenner and Don doing just casually sitting around relaxing or were they planning other things between moving things, what do you think it is? It's too early to do another survey, it's really too early to do a good survey, but to be honest, I don't care, we have important points to overcome. Tasha T is still recovering from motion sickness from the previous map. night, so I don't think there's much hope for her right now with the polls, but it doesn't matter, we finished the current poll right now and the pole may be the new one on May 31st.

What do you think Don and Brenna were doing when? the family and the police were in Montello, lazy, relaxed, working, something to do with Dylan, cover up, make sure to vote right now, okay, so yeah, increase in communication between certain suspects and these suspects, who now have beneficial charges. Brenna, okay, so relate to that when referring. Let's get back to how Dylan could have been eliminated and when the candy deadline was. Cooley agreed and suggested that between Saturday and Sunday and even Monday morning is when everything could have happened and I agree, I agree, I would say maybe Sunday is the key.

The day it actually happened, I would say Saturday is when the desecration took place and then they took him out and moved him somewhere else and hid him on a Sunday because on a Saturday you take Dylan out and temporarily bury him. I have to attend the barbecue. He might even talk to Don about it. Haley and even confesses and Don says yeah we'll see where you put Dylan right now oh yeah here on Sunday all day we'll keep things going and get rid of the rest and move Dylan maybe. that's the way I said the reason Monday is a possibility despite it being May 30th when the family went there to look for Dylan Kenny.

Cooley said they arrived at the scene later that day, so in the early hours of the morning there was still time to clarify if necessary, since the family was not there immediately, which is why that day was also given now, such Once paralyzed, this had more to do with reflecting on Dylan's rounds. Okay, it still has to do with Dylan. It's kind of interesting, it depends on how. Look at it, so in addition to looking for Dylan, Kenny Cooley was saying how during the holiday period, okay, she was answering Nate Eaton's question about when it's that time of year or time of month.

Tasha, I'm not talking about that. month Betty Hayward red hand painting stay with that, but we're not talking about that time of the month either talking about festive occasions celebrations Mother's Day Father's Day Thanksgiving Christmas candy Cooley said during those holiday periods these first experiences without her son Dylan is not as bad as what other families go through because she used him since Dylan and the other son were constantly working and farming and those things said he would call here and there, say hello whatever and then go on his way, so no they did it. They really spent too much time as a family, they didn't have all these big family gatherings like other people like in the US, so when we went through all this now, because Dylan wasn't really there at the time with the family, we didn't It's there now. at all, so it's not a big change, it sounds a little iffy that way of putting it, but you know, I guess it's just you know, being honest in a way, but it makes you think that the way Kenny put it in curly form, Dylan would be working. on Mother's Day on Thanksgiving, Dylan would be, I think Kenny put it clearly, as Dylan would be more passionate about spending time farming than being with his own mother, now it just shows how determined, focused and how much farming means for Dylan, it might even imply. a possible obsession with farming to distance himself from family celebrations for the sake of farming, but then again, it's a job, it's a job for Dylan at the time and I guess farming is more demanding and time-consuming, so I guess That might be why Motif and Dylan aren't around as often, but are some people going to twist that and say, well, Dylan chose farming over family for other reasons deep down, I don't know. , but there is always the possibility that someone will change it in that direction? admit it right now, okay, aside from referring to Brenner and the current situation with him, Candy's curly time with that death penalty, even though it's off the table, it's on the table, like Indiana leaning over the table, Indiana said his interior.

Cave System spreads out like the gentle river or something or London Bridge Indiana I think you've been leaning over the table too long things have fused into position they've become rigid Indiana use your industrial WD-40 and you'll be perfectly fine Okay, there's no need for Wes to come all broke Back Mountain style and undo you like that, we don't need to get to that stage. It's okay, everything is under control. Indiana, calm down, but yes, the death penalty. Candy's Cooley responded to Nate Eaton's question by saying that she really she really wants the death penalty for Brenner, hell yeah he said in quotes why do you want the death penalty for Brenner to make him suffer?

It goes the same way Dylan made him deaf when he was killed, yeah, but I said, isn't that more practical? seeing Brenna suffer for a longer period of time in jail, in prison, around other prisoners, that's what would make him uncomfortable, maybe he's not that afraid of death, so you'd want to put him in comfortable situations to let him suffer more and that seems to be further away from the death penalty anyway, related to that, this is kind of the final point, but it's arguably just as important as some of the previous ones, so everyone who's watching now we have another really important point and response from Candice Cooley I don't know if this will help Miss T understand or if it will make her fall down and get frustrated and nervous, maybe not nervous.

You know, I'm not showing her chest area, but I'm just frustrated, basically, Candice. Cooley referred to that offer in agreement with Brenner who originally offered to reveal information about the location of Dylan's rounds. Kenny's Cooley responded to that in her last interview and said that even if that happened to herself she wouldn't be satisfied and when you hear that you think what you get information you can find yourself you're missing out son and you're not satisfied what more do you want Candy's Cooley added an interesting point onwards I don't know if it will make you rethink things but in quotes, she said we could move on, we could get Dylan back, but what if Jim Brenner reoffends in the future?

That depends on us. He is avery interesting point. You could say that it is very selfless to think that way to offer the opportunity to find oneself. son in the background while we prevent any of the families from being hurt in the future. I completely understand this. I don't know if anyone else does. Still, they are sabotaging their own chances of finding their son safely, but it cancels out the possibility of something more bad happening in the future by Brenner Candice Cooley said that if the plea deal is based on the conditions that if Brenner discloses information, they will take years off his sentence, but there is no death penalty either, that duneline Brenner could be released at some point Candice curly does it I don't want that result because if Brenner is released in the future he could reoffend, he has already reoffended countless times in the past, so it could definitely happen again.

The question is where, if it happened, who would be the next victim, another family, another individual younger than you? How many more could there be? You never know, so Candice Cooley is thinking long-term about the possible damage that could be caused if Brenner were released in the future. Who could you target next? Kenny Cooley doesn't want that, she doesn't want that. responsibility, that feeling of guilt may be what guides her in her judgment, where it overshadows and conflicts with her emotion of Pride, as well as with stubbornness, there may be a factor of stubbornness that counteracts and conflicts with the pride in trying to find her own son without the devil's help stubbornness translates into worry worry about what might happen in the future if Brenna gets out she can't let that happen she doesn't want anyone else to be her so he's sacrificing his own chances of finding Dylan.

Faster so we can keep other people in the community safe, so I completely understand all of that. It's probably still not the most practical way from the looks of it with Brenna and her health and her age, even if he was released. In the future, he might be too sick and too old to pose a threat, maybe, so wouldn't it be worth taking that risk so he can get the information, find Dylan and then Brenna can do whatever in jail and suffer that? way and then by the time he could be released, he may have already passed away, but at least he got that information, so it's like the risk of choosing option A.

You know what? Let's do a poll right now. Let me know what you would do. Choose what decision you would make. If you were Candice Cooley right now, would you choose option A? Get information from Brenner. Finding your son or daughter sooner at the cost of potentially losing another life in the future. and hurt because Brenna was released in the future and reoffended or you would choose option b, you would try to find Dylan yourself for that satisfaction but the chances of this happening are significantly lower and it could take much longer for possibilities that you may never find except in that The positive thing is that you guarantee the safety of the community and the rest of the humans in public, but Brenner will never harm them.

Which option do you choose for a or b? Let me know what you think, it's pretty um, I mean, for some people it's a no-brainer, but maybe for other people who might think I'm not too sure, I would say go for option b if you felt confident enough and had the resources, equipment and time to be able to locate Dylan, of course, but the way this case has gone option b doesn't seem like the most practical of options correct option A Yeah, yeah, that's basically the interview. Well, what happened. This video was longer than the interview itself, which is a little ironic but it went a little deeper.

I had to compare and contrast with what we have heard before. I said I think this is one of the most important interviews to date, but let me know your thoughts below. Do you think it was as important as I think it was or not? just list it below if you also have questions and want them answered, please include them in the comments section and be sure to like the video to help spread awareness. Yesterday was somewhat successful, so if we can maintain that consistency, I will also appreciate it if you counteract YouTube's treatment of me.

It is a disaster. There are links below one. If you want to watch the video above and see the latest breaking news with evidence found, be sure to click on it and then click on some of our links below if you want to support the channel in some way, hopefully by the end of this day , you enjoyed the video and were able to follow along with some ease and if you caught any of the contradictions or information I presented to you. You may have missed it or not said it, be sure to list it below. I think we'll leave it there for now.

I'm sure something will happen next. It always seems to happen, time will tell, so yeah, thanks for watching. Goodbye Goodnight. now see you next time