Problem in Ukraine: Elon Musk shuts down Ukraine attack

Elon Musk is helping Russia Yes, you've heard that right, an American businessman is using his American company to help Russia in its war against Ukraine. It recently emerged that Elon Musk refused to activate Internet service in Crimea to help Ukraine eliminate the Russian naval fleet. Musk's reasoning may further escalate the war. Instead, he recommends that both sides agree to a truce. Why Ukraine shouldn't listen to Musk? He has decades of experience building cars and rockets, that doesn't qualify him to give wartime advice to the country's leaders. In this video, let's go over exactly what happened, the hidden reason behind Musk's refusal to help Ukraine, and why all of this indicates a huge risk to national security.

First of all, press the like button below the videos that talk about

attack

s and wars that are not treated fairly in the world. algorithm and its light signal to the algorithm that there is valuable information in this video and that it should not be suppressed. Let's start from the beginning. An excerpt from Elon Musk's upcoming biography was published in the Washington Post. Throughout the excerpt, we discover that Elon Musk. gave his biographer private messages from a top Ukrainian official without asking permission, this should be a big deal in itself, but many overlook it because through the message we learn that Elon Musk intervened to cut off military access Ukrainian to Starlink near Ukrainian territory occupied by In late September, Russian forces thwarted a secret Ukrainian naval drone

attack

on the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, occupied Crimea.

It's crazy that he shared a private message with the head of a country. We will soon cover how he has also been in contact with Putin. Let's see if he also shared those conversations, otherwise we can clearly see some biases, but anyway let's focus on the Starlink cuts at the time when Elon Musk believed it was reckless for Ukraine to launch an attack on Crimea, which Russia had annexed in 2014. He had just spoken. The Russian ambassador to the United States had been explicitly told that a Ukrainian attack on Crimea would lead to a nuclear response by the ambassador throughout the afternoon and during the night he personally took charge of the situation and decided that allowing the use of Starlink to The attack could be a disaster for the world, so he secretly told his engineers to turn off coverage within 100 kilometers of the Crimean coast.

As a result, when Ukrainian unmanned submarines approached the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, they lost connectivity and were washed ashore harmlessly when the Ukrainians. The military realized that Starlink was disabled in and around Crimea. Musk received frantic calls and text messages asking him to return coverage to Federov. The Deputy Prime Minister who had originally requested his help secretly shared with him the details of how the Drone Subs were crucial to his Fight For Freedom, he sent a text message using an encrypted app, we made the sea drones ourselves, they can destroy any cruise ship or submarine. I did not share this information with anyone.

I just want you, the person who is changing the world through technology, to know this. Musk responded that the drone design was impressive, but he refused to back down from the Crimea coverage arguing that Ukraine is now going too far and inviting strategic defeat. He also called the Russian ambassador to assure him that Starlink was being used for defensive purposes, only Musk said whether the Ukrainian attacks had managed to sink the Russian fleet. It would have been like a mini Pearl Harbor and would have led to a major escalation that we didn't want to be a part of.

In early October, Musk extended his restrictions on using Starlink for offensive operations. By disabling some of its coverage in the Russian-controlled southern and eastern regions of Ukraine, this led to another flood of calls and highlighted the enormous role Starlink was playing. Neither Ukraine nor the United States had been able to find any other communication system that could match Starlink or defend itself against attacks by Russian hackers. In the excerpt another conversation was shared with Ukraine's Deputy Prime Minister Mikhail Fedorov. I will read that soon Fedorov pressured Musk to allow Ukraine to use the service to fight in the Russian-controlled southern regions. and Eastern Federov declared that the exclusion of these territories is absolutely unjust.

I come from the village of Vasilifka in the Zappariza region. My parents and friends live there. Now this village is occupied by Russian troops and there is total anarchy and outrage. Residents eagerly await the release. At the end of September we noticed that Starlink is not working in these liberated villages, making it impossible for us to restore the critical infrastructure of these territories. It's a matter of life or death. Musk responded that once Russia is fully mobilized they will destroy all infrastructure throughout Ukraine. and push far beyond the current territories NATO will have to intervene to prevent all of Ukraine from falling into the hands of Russia, at which point the risk of a Third World War becomes very high.

Federov said the mobilization in Russia could lead to Putin's overthrow. This is not a war of The Russian people and they do not want to go to Ukraine. Musk declared that Russia will stop at nothing. Nothing to hold Crimea. This poses catastrophic traffic risks to the world. Seek peace while you have the advantage. Let's discuss this. Musk included his new private cell phone number. It will support any pragmatic path to peace that serves the common good of all humanity. Federov responded: I understand that we look through the eyes of Ukrainians and you from the position of a person who wants to save humanity and not just once, but does it more than anyone else.

This is why after this excerpt was published, most people were furious that Elon Musk decided to help Russia on Twitter. Musk defended his decision in a post that claimed he avoided nuclear war. It's a whole different can of worms that we'll get into soon. review Musk's response he posted saying there was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink to Sevastopol, the obvious intention being to sink most of the anchored Russian fleet. If he had agreed to his request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit. In a major act of war and conflict escalation, he also clarified that the Starlink regions in question were not activated.

SpaceX did not deactivate anything. Lastly, he said that both sides should agree to a truce. Every day that passes, more young Ukrainians and Russians die to gain and lose small pieces of land with borders that barely change this is not worth their lives. I just can't explain how little Musk understands this war, so let's unpack everything we covered so far. This whole saga happened in September last year. Ukraine has since attacked the Russian navy. The fleet and Russia did not escalate to nuclear war; in fact, destroying the fleet probably saved hundreds of innocent Ukrainian lives because Russia couldn't use damaged fleets to bomb Ukrainian cities, so Musk's analysis was clearly wrong, so maybe he should abandon Battlefield.

Analyze the experts and focus on what is good because of this decision. Russia was able to use those fleets to continue bombing Ukraine, resulting in the loss of countless innocent Ukrainian lives. I understand that Musk wants to save lives on both the Russian and Ukrainian sides, but he is not an expert in this and has made poorly informed decisions. They are killing innocent people. I want to save cancer patients, but I realize that it won't help anyone if I start performing surgeries that will, in fact, probably cause unnecessary deaths, so I let the surgeons handle that because they are experts in that field, some of you You might think it's a stupid example, but I hope you understand the point I'm trying to make.

In fact, Zelinski's top advisor claims that Elon Musk's decision to help Russia by disabling Starlink for Ukrainians led to the deaths of civilians, including children, sometimes a mistake is much more than a mistake by not allowing Ukrainian drones. destroy part of the Russian military fleet through Starlink interference. As a result, Elon Musk allowed this fleet to fire caliber missiles at Ukrainian cities. civilians, children are being killed, this is the price of a cocktail of ignorance and big ego; However, the question still remains: why do some people so desperately want to defend war criminals and their desire to commit murder and now realize that they are committing evil and encouraging evil?

Before I make my next point, I want to I emphasize that I don't think that is the case, but it is still a possibility and I want to present to you all the information that Musk himself has stated that he has spoken with Putin several times and many times his decisions seem to be very pro-Russian, which makes to make it seem like he's following Russian orders or doing things to please Putin, for now it just doesn't make any sense why you would do that and that's why he said that's most likely not the case, it just seems a little bit like that.

Finally, your solution that both sides should agree to a truce because escalation to nuclear war will only cost more lives is clearly not logical because, based on the same logic, any rogue nuclear power like Russia has the de facto right to invade countries. non-nuclear and their only requirement for them is to eventually sign a truce so they can recover and a truce does not provide any security for Ukraine. Russia routinely violated peace agreements at its convenience. a peace with Ukraine before the 2014 invasion, also solidified by several international treaties that Russia signed and then ignored when it was deemed strong enough to attack, even after the 2014 invasion of Crimea.

Ukraine did not use full military force to retake Crimea, but that did not happen. Not stopping Putin from launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. I can also remind you that at the beginning of the invasion Putin's goal was to take over Kiev, replace Zelinski and integrate Ukraine into Russia if Ukraine had not fought to save lives like Musk does. Today there would be no Ukraine, it is clear that the only way for there to be peace in Ukraine is if there is no Putin in Russia. Lastly, think about how crazy this situation is, how much power the CEO of a private company has, imagine that the United States and the Pentagon wanted to carry out some mission to defend their borders, then the CEO of a private company puts put an end to that because he doesn't agree with the strategy, if that happens in the US, Elon would be in jail for treason because every country has the right to defend itself. against an aggressor and who is Elon to disagree with how they want to defend their citizens