YTread Logo
YTread Logo

Nvidia Debunks Conspiracy Theories About Moon Landing

Apr 09, 2020
On July 20, 1969, three astronauts flew to the

moon

for three days when they arrived there. Two astronauts, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, boarded the lunar excursion module called LEM and descended to the

moon

. The trip lasted another two and a half hours. apparently much more difficult than they expected with only 40 seconds of fuel Neil lands the lam on the surface of the Moon Michael Collins orbiting the moon awaiting its return shortly after

landing

Armstrong left the LEM and takes the first step on the moon that happened one small step for man one giant step for humanity shortly after Buzz Aldrin leaves the LEM and very carefully not closing the door to get out of the hatch because it turns out they never designed a door handle on the outside. the branch and go down the stairs what you're seeing here is that pivotal photograph that was taken by Neil Armstrong a pivotal photograph taken by Neil Armstrong of Buzz Aldrin when they landed on the moon while they were standing when they stepped on the lunar surface of The Tranquility Base of Tranquility Bay, well those photographs came back to earth and of course to this day it still takes my breath away thinking about it, it was one step for man, but surely one giant step for man, but those photographs They returned inspired hundreds of millions, but at the same time, it caused many people to become excited about whether the origin of this photograph was really of the moon.
nvidia debunks conspiracy theories about moon landing
There was good reason to question these photographs in the first place when you look at that picture of Buzz Aldrin and look at the shadows. on the ground the dark shadows he is surely in the shadow yes he is surely in the shadow because the Sun is on the other side of the limb how is it possible that he is that bright second that we know that there is no atmosphere on the moon and if there is no atmosphere ? on the moon we should be able to see the stars clearly, they knew that we could very easily, through the position of the stars, determine if they were really on the moon and the belief is that it must have been too complicated to align them so we decided to omit them, it is This photograph may have been taken here on Earth now with the invention of VX GI and through the extraordinary efforts of our engineers, we meticulously modeled the lunar nun.
nvidia debunks conspiracy theories about moon landing

More Interesting Facts About,

nvidia debunks conspiracy theories about moon landing...

This is the wonderful thing about the lunar LEM: it is done. of aluminum foil cloth and a generous application of duct tape it was a flying cocaine no wonder Aldrin and Armstrong wanted to get out of that thing as fast as they could it was a flying cocaine we modeled every detail we had to model every detail we modeled the surface of the Moon so that we could begin to study and test these mysteries and come to our own conclusion through scientific means, if possible, if they landed on the Moon, ladies and gentlemen. I would like to demonstrate it to you now. our work, a small detail now, first of all, confess, you thought it was a photograph, right, it was a photograph, you thought it was a photograph, the first time I saw it, well, the first time I saw it it was difficult , but for the The time I saw the final works I thought it was a photograph, it really was a really amazing job, the engineers modeled every little detail, so let's go over and think about testing each of those

conspiracy

theories

.
nvidia debunks conspiracy theories about moon landing
The first is this Kurtis. Let's say it's in shadow and the only light source is direct, this is what it would look like, this is what Buzz would look like and this is what people expected it to look like and the reason for this is because the Sun It is on the other side of the Lamb and you can also see the shadows on the ground are perfectly dark so how is it possible that it is illuminated? It turns out that we modeled the entire surface of the moon, we modeled the dust particles on the moon and we learned this, we learned that the dust particles on the moon, which are obviously created from asteroids, my fence to the moon is okay, relentless for billions of years they are fine particles and actually have reflective properties, now the reflective properties are not great, it just reflects. about 10-12 percent of the light that hits it, however, like a mini type of dust particles and crystals, when a light hits it directly and you look at it from the same angle as the light source, the reflected light It is several times brighter than otherwise.
nvidia debunks conspiracy theories about moon landing
It would have reflected that it is a phenomenon called a wave of opposition. Well, we simulated the properties of lunar dust and as you can see right now, the Sun is behind me, the lamb is next to me, look at the glow of the Sun as it breaks off the lunar surface, I guess. We were going to turn on VX GI and turn each surface into a light source to reflect the light, let's see what happens, well, voila, reflecting off this lunar surface, reflecting off the lunar surface, the Sun was able to illuminate Buzz Aldrin well.
That's mystery number one, mystery number two is this, why while we're looking at it right now don't we see the stars well? That's a simple answer, turns out it's a simple matter of exposure, the light is so bright, in fact, In fact, the light is so bright that they had to change the exposure on their camera to the point where it's not too bright. on the surface of the Moon and therefore you can no longer see the stars, and that's what we did. In fact, when we look at the sky, we model the closest 84,000 stars around the Earth that we can see from Earth and if we changed our exposure, this is what we would see, not Curtis, what would happen now?
If we were to look down now, this is what you would have seen if you adjusted your pupil and got used to seeing the stars and then looked down, everything would be so white, so bright because of the brightness of the reflected sun. the surface of the moon now let's change the exposure again please look how beautiful it is huh Hello guys, what do you think? Real-time computer graphics with real-time global illumination. Well, there is another

conspiracy

. This particular question was kind of interesting. Well, it turns out. Can we go to the slide please when you look at this other iconic image of Buzz stepping on the moon?
It is taken with a camera dropped from the lamb and a captured Neil Armstrong exiting the ladder and a captured Buzz Aldrin exiting the ladder. The theory that this photograph was taken on Earth was because they believed that some believed that that light source, that really bright light source beyond the hum, was actually a light that they forgot or somehow mistakenly didn't remove from the way when they took. this picture and a word, let's go back to our simulation, in fact, if you were to look at that well, that's an interesting question, until you found out where Neil Armstrong was standing, where Neil Armstrong was standing when he took In the other iconic photograph, you'll find out that I've here there is a white object.
Well, here's the surprising thing. Neil Armstrong's spacesuit is made primarily of Teflon, a material called beta cloth, and has a reflectivity of about 90% of all light. I mean, it hits Neil Armstrong, 90% of it bounces off me. You could imagine how bright the Sun is without being disturbed by the atmosphere. He enlightens Neil Armstrong and helped us solve one last unexplained problem when we were working on this project. One last thing we could never understand is why when we compared and now we have simulated everything down to the bottom, we simulated the brightness of the Sun, we simulated the reflectivity and the material of the lunar surface, we have captured all the geometry, we have put all the right materials on the lunar lander and a lunar lander reflects and also shines its light on Buzz.
We have modeled every little detail now. Why does Buzz still look too dark when we look at it? It wasn't until we modeled Neil Armstrong and put him on stage that we could see the difference. How about we turn Neil on and off on that little detail and show you in just a moment. Secondly, it's so compelling that we now understand why Buzz was lit the way he was. Well, let's take a look, let's go out and take a look at Neil and what he looks at seems to be Neil, yeah, isn't he so beautiful? It's really wonderful to see the extraordinary details that the engineers put in and lastly let's compare the before and after, if you can go to the slides, if you are not sure the right side is the photograph, the left side is the simulation, what are you doing?
You think in the Cornell box example I essentially used a photograph to test real-time computer graphics and we continued to improve its capabilities, added VH GI and as a result of that, real-time computer graphics became very close to the image. which was generated by the rain of eyes now that we have the xgi we use the technology that engineers use to prove with a seminal iconic and controversial photograph that was taken in the 60s

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact